Recurring concern

Failure to control risks posed by care-home residents to themselves and others

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 3 Aug 2016•Latest report 1 Aug 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes care-home safeguarding and risk-control failures concerning risks posed by a resident to themselves or other residents, including failure to assess or reassess those risks, create or use risk-informed care plans, arrange protective supervision or separation, and implement or review safeguards intended to prevent harm.

Not included

  • Excludes generic care-plan or risk-assessment omissions where no risk posed by a care-home resident to themselves or others is identified.
  • Excludes routine resident care, staffing, training or documentation deficiencies that are not directly part of controlling resident-related safeguarding risks.
  • Excludes isolated resident behaviour or harm outcomes where no continuing failure in the care-home risk-control or safeguarding arrangements is asserted.
  • Excludes safeguarding concerns involving children, prisoners or non-residential settings unless the assertion explicitly concerns the same care-home resident-risk process.
Reports
6

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
6

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2016–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
11

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Birmingham City Council1
Capital Care Group Limited1
Care Quality Commission1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Kerria Court1
Reinbek1
Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust1
St Johns Nursing Home Limited1
Westlands Retirement Home1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret Dorothy MEDLICOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Dorothy Medlicott, who lived with dementia, sustained a severe head injury after being deliberately pushed by another resident at Haresbrook Park Care Home on 23 April 2020. She died in hospital from complications of that injury on 3 May 2020. Concerns included the admission of residents despite agreed restrictions, failures to complete proper risk assessments and care plans, and whether staff were trained and supported to question unsafe decisions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete proper risk assessments and care plans for risks to residents and others

    Wider context from the report

    “2) Despite being aware of concerns about the behaviour of both Mrs. Medlicott and the other resident both before and shortly after their respective admissions to the care home, staff there failed to complete proper risk assessments and care plans addressing the risks posed by each of them to themselves and to others. Those failures were accepted, but the inquest heard no satisfactory explanation as to why they might have occurred. There is therefore concern that the staff concerned, and perhaps other staff at the care home, have not received proper training in how to carry out these important tasks. ”

    Source location

    Margaret Dorothy MEDLICOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement PCS as an integrated electronic system for care plans, risk assessments, task alerts and management oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Home is now benefitting from a fully integrated electronic care system, namely PCS (Person-Centred Software). The maintaining of care documentation, including risk assessments, in one place allows for one point of reference for all members of staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Capital Care Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require monthly sample audits and random spot checks of care documentation and delivered care, with action plans addressing audit findings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Each Home conducts its own internal audits on care documentation. Each Home Manager is responsible for managing how its Home completes its oversight. At Haresbrook Park Care Home, the Care Team Leaders are responsible for overseeing the care plans on their unit. Every month, they will be required to conduct an audit on a sample of care plans on the alternate unit. The results of these audits will be shared with the Home Manager who will compose an action plan to be addressed by the next month's audit. The Care Team Leaders are also responsible for conducting random spot checks on both documentation and on the floor care.”

    Source location

    Response from Capital Care Group
    Page 6 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete organisation-wide audits of care documentation to establish baselines and identify lessons for training, tools, governance and further audit scheduling.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure organisation oversight, the organisation's compliance manager is completing a full audit of all Homes care documentation. This was completed for Haresbrook Park Care Home on 22 August 2025. The results have been shared with the Home Manager and all staff will be addressed at a mandatory Home-wide meeting on 24 September 2025. Beyond organisation oversight, the audit has allowed the compliance manager to obtain each Home's baseline and then work to generate an”

    Source location

    Response from Capital Care Group
    Page 6 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing electronic systems, training, audits and governance are considered sufficient to support robust risk assessments and care documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Home is now benefitting from a fully integrated electronic care system, namely PCS (Person-Centred Software). The maintaining of care documentation, including risk assessments, in one place allows for one point of reference for all members of staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Capital Care Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response
  2. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Hazel Lillian MAYHO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hazel Lillian MAYHO, aged 82, died on 27 May 2022 after suffering a brain injury when she fell in the garden of a nursing home. The report raised concerns about hazards in the garden, staff being unable to effectively observe vulnerable residents, and the absence of an effective exit control or alert system for residents at risk of entering the garden alone.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of an effective exit control or alert system for residents at risk of entering the garden alone

    Wider context from the report

    “The deceased was 82 years of age, was severely frail and suffered from dementia. The deceased was assessed as being at high risk of falls and a reputation for wandering around the establishment. The deceased was not unique amongst the other residents in having such vulnerabilities. The lounge areas of the nursing home have doors leading to the garden. The garden has within it potential hazards to a vulnerable resident with a high risk of falls. The doors are kept wide open in warm weather. Whether a resident has entered the garden is only known if they are observed by a member of staff to do so. Members of staff are frequently distracted by other duties hindering their ability to fully and effectively observe vulnerable residents entering the garden. There is an absence of an effective exit control process to ensure that those with a recognised risk of entering the garden alone are prevented from doing so or an effective alert system is triggered when they do so. ”

    Source location

    Hazel Lillian MAYHO · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install an additional beam to detect garden entry when doors are open.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An additional beam has been installed (8th December 2022) – this allows the doors to be open when required in hot weather at residents’ request but it now allows for staff to know if someone has entered into the garden without them being observed should they be busy and not able to see if this has happened as mentioned in your report, this is a separate beam to the door opening and closing.”

    Source location

    Response from Westlands Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 October 2022

    Open published response
  3. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Stephen Martin Verrall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephen Martin Verrall fell from the window of his first-floor room at St John’s Nursing Home and died from his injuries two days later. Concerns included an inadequate window restrictor, lack of a window-maintenance risk assessment, unrestricted windows remaining years later, and risks of residents leaving the home unaccompanied.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent unaccompanied exit by residents without capacity or ability to assess risk

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) St John’s Nursing Home – I heard that Stephen had managed to leave the home unaccompanied on several occasions. The opportunity to do so for those without capacity and without the ability to assess risk poses a risk to their lives. I was told that the reception is not manned on the weekends and there is a risk that residents may follow visitors through the door when they leave. ”

    Source location

    Stephen Martin Verrall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Restrict visitor access codes and require staff accompaniment for entry and exit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “i. Visitors are not given the key code, which is changed regularly, for entry or exit so are accompanied by a member of staff;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Advise staff about unauthorised exits and require secure door closure and vigilance around reception.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ii. All staff have been advised of the potential problem of residents leaving through the front door. When letting visitors in and out of the building staff ensure the door is securely closed behind them and they have been advised to be alert around the reception area during the course of their working day/night;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Station the administrator in reception during normal working hours to monitor the entrance and secure door closure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iii. During normal working hours, the administrator is situated in the reception area and ensures staff securely closes the door behind them;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Advertise for a weekend receptionist to monitor the door at weekends.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iv. We are advertising for a weekend receptionist to ensure going forwards the door is monitored at weekends. In the interim, all staff are ensuring the door is closed securely behind them;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Position a staff member by the side gate during fire drills and disable the gate's exit code.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “v. We ensure that when there is a fire drill a member of staff stands by the side gate. This gate is key coded for exit, which is disabled during fire drills. The member of staff ensures residents do not leave the premises;”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-St-Johns-Nursing-Home-Ltd_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check at the next inspection that St John’s Nursing Home has embedded its premises-security changes and is effectively minimising identified risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to inspecting St John’s Nursing Home on 13 October 2021, we also wrote to the registered provider on 21 October 2021 and asked them to provide any further information and supporting evidence about the action they have taken or intend to take in response to your report. We received a response from the registered provider on 22 October 2021.”

    Source location

    2021-0336-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 October 2021

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Ruth Gregory · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ruth Gregory had reduced mobility after a fall that led to a total knee replacement and subsequently developed an infected knee. After vomiting suggestive of an upper gastrointestinal bleed, she was readmitted to hospital, deteriorated due to aspiration pneumonia and died on 2 July 2018. The inquest heard that residents were regularly left unsupervised in communal areas, with no detail available about how this risk was managed or how supervision was ensured.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of supervision of residents in communal areas of care homes

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that Mrs Gregory's daughter required the knee replacement after being knocked over by another resident in the care home. The inquest was told that residents were regularly left unsupervised in communal areas of the care home and that this meant similar incidents could reoccur leading to trauma and consequential death. There was no detail available at the inquest about how this risk was managed and arrangements to ensure supervision of communal areas. ”

    Source location

    Ruth Gregory · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase staffing levels across homes, including adding a deputy manager and increasing night cover.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This time last year January 2018 we increased the staffing levels in all our homes due to the dependency of the residents we are caring for.”

    Source location

    2019-0017-Response-by-Borough-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing staffing, risk assessments and nurse-call access are considered sufficient to keep communal areas safe despite occasional short unattended periods.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst there may be occasions when the communal areas are unattended for short periods this has been significantly reduced by the increase in staffing levels.”

    Source location

    2019-0017-Response-by-Borough-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 May 2019

    Open published response
  5. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Arthur Thomas Adley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Arthur Thomas Adley, a resident at Candle Court Nursing Home, was pushed by another resident on 8 April 2016, fell and struck his face and head on a table, and died in hospital the same day. The substantive concern was that safeguarding systems did not prevent risks posed to other residents by residents who presented a risk when placed in care homes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of safeguarding systems to prevent risks posed by residents to other residents in care homes

    Wider context from the report

    “That the systems for safeguarding for residents who present a risk to other residents when placed in care homes did not prevent that risk to other residents. ”

    Source location

    Arthur Thomas Adley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Oversight of the reported safety concerns was assigned to the Care Quality Commission as the independent regulator of providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CQC is the independent regulator of health and adult social care providers in England. I have, therefore, sent your report to the Care Quality Commission (CQC) as the body with oversight in the case.”

    Source location

    2016-0358-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 February 2017

    Open published response
  6. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Winston Harris · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Winston Harris, a resident with dementia, left hospital on 17 March 2016 after previously attempting to leave the ward. He was found at a bus stop the following day, severely hypothermic with an acute kidney injury, and died on 22 March 2016; the inquest concluded that he died from dilated cardiomyopathy contributed to by hypothermia and acute kidney injury. Concerns included inadequate documentation of his absconding risk and pending deprivation of liberty application, failure to consider an emergency deprivation of liberty safeguard, and delays in processing the application.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include absconding risk and previous absconding behaviour in the care plan

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The care plan for Mr Harris did not deal with his risk of absconding. As a result when he was transferred to City Hospital with his care plan there were no details of his previous absconding behaviour. ”

    Source location

    Winston Harris · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026