Recurring concern

Unreliable community Home Treatment Team care pathways

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 12 Sep 2013•Latest report 27 May 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures specifically within Home Treatment Team pathways, including referral, urgent assessment, handover, responsibility for initiating contact, treatment transitions, withdrawal or discharge communication and pathway guidance.

Not included

  • Generic community mental-health coordination with no Home Treatment Team pathway
  • Home Treatment Team staffing or treatment-quality failures after the pathway controls have operated reliably
  • Unrelated mental-health referral, discharge or crisis pathways
Reports
29

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
39

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
36

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care6
NHS England4
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust3
North East London NHS Foundation Trust3
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Board2
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board2
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust2
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust2
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust2
West Midlands Police2
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
Birmingham City Council1
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abbigail Louise Smith was found at Braintree Recreation Ground on 15 February 2022 and was pronounced deceased shortly after midnight on 16 February 2022 from compression of the neck by ligature. The report describes concerns about failures in mental-health care, communication, staff training, risk assessment and discharge planning, including her discharge to supported living without an adequate plan to mitigate a known risk of self-harm.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to verify service acceptance and agree an appropriate discharge care plan

    Wider context from the report

    “12. Abbi had anti-ligature bedding, and her room stripped of her possessions, and this remained in place at the time of her discharge. The responsible clinician was informed by a preceptorship nurse that the Home Treatment Team had refused to accept Abbi as she had a care co-ordinator. This information was known by the treating team to be incorrect, the Home Treatment team had agreed to see Abbi on 25 January 2022, and other patients had been assessed and discharged from the Ward with these arrangements previously. This was not checked or challenged, and Abbi was discharged without further discussion with professionals about an appropriate care plan. ”

    Source location

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek Home Treatment Team advice and implement the appropriate crisis pathway

    Wider context from the report

    “13. Although Abbi had some dialogue about the future on 15 February, she informed the community mental health team that she did not want to go on anymore, had lived her life, could not give any assurances for her safety and was declining help. Advice from the Home Treatment Team was not sought and the community team wanted to step up care, but this had not been put in place and was not the process to be followed for a crisis. ”

    Source location

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Stepped-up care from the community team was used instead of Home Treatment Team referral because it provided prompt, familiar and consistent support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In line with the evidence provided at the Inquest, Abbi was keen to only work with those she was familiar with and had built a good rapport with which included her Care Co-ordinator who visited Abbi at home. The community team worked hard to build this rapport with Abbi and with the community team as a whole and arrange visits to support Abbi in an attempt to build rapport.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 10 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The community crisis pathway requires additional community measures to be attempted before referral to the Home Treatment Team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Gables duly updated the team at the Pavilion where Abbi resided. It is important to note that Abbi would need to agree to the referral to the Home Treatment Team (HTT) before this could be arranged for her.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 11 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A Home Treatment Team referral could not be arranged without the patient’s agreement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is important to note that the Home Treatment Team have 24hrs to complete their gatekeeping assessment, whereas the Gables SMHT saw her in less than 24hrs. In addition, the Gables attended to Abbi via a face to face review and made a call to Abbi on the morning of the 15ᵗʰ February 2022 to inform her of the discussion and plan to further support her via an MDT discussion.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 11 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response
  2. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Wayne Pierce Walton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wayne Pierce Walton was discharged from the Caludon Centre on 21 June 2024 after taking an overdose with the intention of ending his life. He failed to engage consistently with the Home Treatment Team and died by asphyxiation on 29 June 2024. Concerns included inadequate completion and transfer of risk assessment and safety plan information, and a lack of guidance on potential conflicts of interest involving staff who recognised a patient outside the circumstances covered by an existing policy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of staff awareness of Home Treatment Team policies and required risk information

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Staff involved in the decision-making process for a patient’s discharge as an inpatient, into the care of the Home Treatment Team, were unaware of the policies applicable to the Home Treatment Team and were therefore unaware of the requisite information that should have been added into Risk Assessments and Safety Plans for the benefit of their colleagues in the Home Treatment Team. As risk assessment and risk formulation documentation had not been adequately completed, the Home Treatment Team were not able to identify a full and up to date risk analysis. Had the inpatient staff been aware of the importance of these documents for their colleagues’ benefit, in addition to the need for accurate completion for internal reasons, there was a risk that important information was not passed on. ”

    Source location

    Wayne Pierce Walton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to pass important risk information to the Home Treatment Team

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Staff involved in the decision-making process for a patient’s discharge as an inpatient, into the care of the Home Treatment Team, were unaware of the policies applicable to the Home Treatment Team and were therefore unaware of the requisite information that should have been added into Risk Assessments and Safety Plans for the benefit of their colleagues in the Home Treatment Team. As risk assessment and risk formulation documentation had not been adequately completed, the Home Treatment Team were not able to identify a full and up to date risk analysis. Had the inpatient staff been aware of the importance of these documents for their colleagues’ benefit, in addition to the need for accurate completion for internal reasons, there was a risk that important information was not passed on. ”

    Source location

    Wayne Pierce Walton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the internal-transfer SOP to clarify handover dates, care-package ownership and joint handover meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our investigatory work from the Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) report PSII2172, focused on learning and improvement, ensuring staff are supported to understand the processes to embed effective documentation of a person’s risk, as well as Trust processes to support safe discharge and/or transition between services. We are revising our Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for Internal Transfers within Adult and Older Adults Mental Health Services (version 5), to reflect the function and structure of the new Electronic Patient Record (EPR) system (SystemOne), and provide clearer guidance on the agreed date of handover of care, the continuation and ownership of care packages during transfer, and the requirement for a joint handover meeting between teams, with an agreed date understood by all.”

    Source location

    2026-0028 - Response from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch the updated EPR Risk and Safety section with demonstration and quick-reference materials for staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of this work, the Trust has launched the updated Risk and Safety section within the EPR, supported by a demonstration package and quick reference guide to assist staff in embedding the new approach into practice. This enhancement strengthens clinical safety, improves the quality of documentation, and aligns practice to national guidance.”

    Source location

    2026-0028 - Response from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit internal transfers after SOP ratification to assess compliance and identify further improvement opportunities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Once ratified, we shall audit our internal transfers between teams to assess compliance, as well as any further opportunities to gain experience, on an ongoing basis.”

    Source location

    2026-0028 - Response from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 January 2026

    Open published response
  3. Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Stuart VIDLER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Vidler had severe depression and was receiving mental health care from Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust. After serious suicide attempts on 30 April and 7 May 2025, he was discharged from the Home Treatment Team and was not reviewed by an out-of-hours clinician on the night of 7 May after a Rapid Response Team referral was declined. He was found dead at home on 8 May 2025, and the inquest concluded that his suicide was contributed to by a failure in care. Concerns included shortcomings in patient-centred care, clinical oversight and referral processes, risk recognition, discharge decision-making, continuity of care, care coordination, and the implementation and recording of suicidality management.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pre-determined HTT discharge decisions before patient assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) I heard evidence that the decision to discharge Mark from the HTT was made at a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) meeting prior to the HTT nurse visiting Mark on 6 May 2025. This raises the concern that the decision was pre-determined. I heard no evidence that this situation has changed. ”

    Source location

    Mark Stuart VIDLER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include the receiving MHT+ team in HTT discharge decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Both the nurse from MHT+ and the consultant psychiatrist gave evidence that the MHT+ were not included, as the receiving team, in the MDT decision on 6 May 2025. They considered that this could have been useful and is something that can and has happened in the past. I was told that this left Mark 'in limbo' following the his discharge from HTT and I was told that this is something that has not changed since. ”

    Source location

    Mark Stuart VIDLER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold twice-weekly multidisciplinary discussions with community services about patient care, including planned Home Treatment Team discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The HTT have initiated a twice weekly MDT discussions with Community services which focuses discussion on aspects of individual patients care including those patients for whom discharge is planned from HTT. This allows for the wider support system to debate and consider the decision to discharge. In addition, as part of the Trusts ongoing development, of understanding and managing risk with our patients, a risk assessment is completed at discharge. If the clinician completing the risk assessment identifies a deterioration in mental state this can and should delay that decision- the team have a mechanism for discussion and decision making regarding clinical care, on a daily basis, and access to a Consultant Psychiatrist for advice and guidance in complex cases.”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway NHS Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide senior Rapid Response clinical input to interface forums for clinically considered decisions and agreed safe discharge plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Rapid Response Team will have senior clinical input into these interface forums where decisions impacting on patient care can be discussed and decisions made clinically to ensure the person has an agreed discharge plan that promotes clinical safety and is based on senior clinical consideration. The revised Standard Operating Procedure will detail that MHT+ colleagues including medics must be invited to these forums to assist with community treatment planning and will be audited 3 monthly to ensure quality, patient safety and positive patient outcomes agreed across the interface of services.”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway NHS Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold twice-weekly clinical interface meetings with local MHT and MHT+ teams to discuss specific cases and support timely community treatment planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following this Inquest outcome, the Home Treatment Team service have implemented a twice weekly clinical MDT interface meeting with local MHT and MHT+ teams to enable and ensure timely discussion of specific cases. Feedback from the clinical teams has been positive as these forums are the opportunity to discuss patients of concern where risk continues to be identified.”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway NHS Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise procedures to require invitations to MHT+ colleagues, including medics, and audit forum participation quarterly for quality and patient safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Rapid Response Team will have senior clinical input into these interface forums where decisions impacting on patient care can be discussed and decisions made clinically to ensure the person has an agreed discharge plan that promotes clinical safety and is based on senior clinical consideration. The revised Standard Operating Procedure will detail that MHT+ colleagues including medics must be invited to these forums to assist with community treatment planning and will be audited 3 monthly to ensure quality, patient safety and positive patient outcomes agreed across the interface of services.”

    Source location

    Response from Kent and Medway NHS Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 January 2026

    Open published response
  4. City of London

    AI-generated summary

    Tony Montana Duncan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tony Montana Duncan had a long-term mental health condition and, during an acute deterioration, told healthcare services that he had suicidal thoughts and planned to jump from a bridge. He was assessed by a psychiatric liaison team and discharged without medication review, admission, documented risk assessment, or follow-up safeguarding, despite information about his suicide plan. On 4 July 2024, he jumped into the River Thames and likely died shortly afterwards; the report identified concerns about the response of mental health services to the risks he presented.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to involve Crisis or Home Treatment teams for immediate safeguarding follow-up

    Wider context from the report

    “2. When the Deceased attended the hospital, the Accident and Emergency team’s triage notes included express reference to his specific suicide plan and attached the GP’s letter of referral. The Deceased was then assessed by a psychiatric liaison nurse who concluded that his presentation was as a result of psycho-social stressors rather than mental illness; she was not concerned about the risk of suicide because he had no plan or intent; and she referred the Deceased to the homelessness team and discharged him back to the care of his GP. The nurse did not take any steps to review the Deceased’s medication or consider admission, or escalate these matters to a doctor, nor did she involve the Crisis or Home Treatment teams for follow up / immediate safeguarding. Despite there being a recognised risk to self and to others, both of which the Deceased himself said he could not control, there is no evidence of any risk assessment documentation being completed. ”

    Source location

    Tony Montana Duncan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Doctor referral was not initially indicated because the established pathway covered admission, medication changes and other clinical complexities, with senior psychiatric doctors available continuously.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Referral by the PLN to a doctor was not clearly indicated, as this pathway is for those who may require admission under the Mental Health Act, or changes to their medication, or for other complexities as deemed by the assessing clinician. The AAR explored onward referral to doctors by PLNs and this was thought to be working well, with senior psychiatric doctors available 24 hours a day. Mr Duncan initially presented as calm and without signs or symptoms of affective disorder or psychosis. Later, when Mr Duncan became agitated, referral to a doctor to consider next steps (including potential referral to a crisis team) may have been indicated, and his self-discharge without further review or discussion was a lost opportunity to review the assessment and offer further support.”

    Source location

    Response from South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response
  5. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Nigel Hutton HAMMOND · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nigel Hammond died at Addenbrooke’s Hospital on 14 March 2024, three days after falling from a window at home and sustaining serious injuries. The inquest concluded that the death was suicide while the balance of his mind was disturbed. The principal concern was that the AMHP could not directly refer Nigel to the Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team, and that this may have delayed support before his fatal fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enable AMHPs to make direct referrals to the emergency Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team

    Wider context from the report

    “7. That said, although Nigel did not meet the criteria for immediate admission, the AMHP believed Nigel was mentally very unwell, and in need of immediate support. The court heard that such support would be available within a 4-hour target time, from the emergency Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team. 8. However, the court was told that an AMHP, despite their role in the coordination of the mental health assessment and admission to hospital of a patient, were not permitted to make direct referrals to the emergency Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team. 9. The court heard that the normal route for such referrals was via the GP Surgery, or primary care Mental Health Nurse, neither of whom in Nigel’s case would have been available before 08:00 on Monday 11th March 2024. Nigel’s fall which led to his death, occurred at 06:25 that morning. 10. I am concerned, as had the AMHP in Nigel’s case been able to directly refer him to the Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team on the 9th March 2024, mental health professionals would have attended, and been able to provide additional support, advice and potentially additional treatment for Nigel, in all likelihood preventing his death. ”

    Source location

    Nigel Hutton HAMMOND · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and disseminate concise guidance to Suffolk AMHPs on CRHTT referral criteria and processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following receipt of the Regulation 28, NSFT and SCC have worked jointly together to develop a short and concise information guide for AMHPs on the referral criteria and process in respect of all CRHHTs in Suffolk. This guidance has been shared with all AMHPs across Suffolk and will be followed up for robust discussion via SCC’s AMHP Service Forum and with all CRHTTs within NSFT.”

    Source location

    Response from Suffolk County Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    AMHPs were able to refer directly to the CRHTT, and the NSFT 111 Service could also make such referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the inquest into Nigel’s death, it has been established through joint meetings between senior managers from both NSFT and SCC that AMHPs are able to refer to the CRHTT but that not all AMHPs were aware of this and that the process for referral was not clear across the AMHP service. The NSFT policy/pathway information had not been shared with SCC and the AMHP service hence resulting in confusion and lack of clarity.”

    Source location

    Response from Suffolk County Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 October 2024

    Open published response
  6. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr David Thompson had a longstanding affective disorder and a history of alcohol and illicit drug use. After receiving inpatient and outpatient mental health care, he consumed alcohol and inflicted deep cuts to his wrists; he died on 3 March 2024 from hypovolaemic shock caused by the wrist injuries. Concerns included gaps in discharge planning and follow-up at Priory Dorking, incomplete awareness of his care and relapse history at Priory Altrincham, and a lack of communication between NHS and private consultants.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to engage the local Home Based Treatment Team before discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There was no engagement prior to discharge with the local Home Based Treatment Team. ”

    Source location

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide five Band 7 Out of Area Practitioners to monitor private out-of-area placements, coordinate providers and support discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure the quality and consistency of the care of Pennine Care patients who are placed in an out of area private bed, an Out of Area Practitioner is responsible for monitoring the inpatient stay, linking in with the relevant providers and inpatient operational leads to ensure all patients receive support and discharge planning as required. The Out of Area Practitioner is a senior mental health practitioner (Band 7) who sits within the Patient Flow Team. They act as a case manager for that patient including attending ward rounds, keeping key professionals (including all Consultants) updated and involvement in repatriation and discharge planning. There are five of these practitioners within the organisation and each practitioner covers one of the five boroughs in which services are commissioned.”

    Source location

    Response from Pennine Care NHS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement sending-provider oversight of out-of-area patients, including ward-round attendance, appropriate visits, and engagement in discharge and care planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “GM ICB expect the NHS “sending” provider to oversee the individual care relating to any patient who is admitted as an Out of Area placement in line with National Host commissioner guidance. This includes attendance at ward rounds, face to face visits where appropriate and full engagement in discharge and care planning. The processes as described above have been implemented since December 2023 and have provided a much tighter grip and control and increased level of oversight of each individual patient.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to confirm and document Community Mental Health Team engagement and follow-up arrangements before discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Issue a reminder to all staff regarding the expectation that referrals to a patient’s community team are to be clearly confirmed and documented on CareNotes prior to a patient’s discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory Group
    Page 7 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The NHS sending provider is responsible for overseeing individual care, including engagement in communication, discharge and care planning for out-of-area patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “GM ICB expect the NHS “sending” provider to oversee the individual care relating to any patient who is admitted as an Out of Area placement in line with National Host commissioner guidance. This includes attendance at ward rounds, face to face visits where appropriate and full engagement in discharge and care planning. The processes as described above have been implemented since December 2023 and have provided a much tighter grip and control and increased level of oversight of each individual patient.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A review of the Altrincham admission was undertaken and concluded that inpatient care was adequate and discharge was appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Matter of concern 3 - internal review following incident”

    Source location

    Response from Priory Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact with external care organisations depends on the information available and the patient's consent.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Upon receipt of details about any external services involved in a patient’s care, it may be appropriate to make contact with these organisations but this will be dependent on the detail of the information made available and whether the patient consents to such contact being made.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response
  7. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew John Shambrook · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew John Shambrook took his own life by hanging on 27 March 2022. The health board acknowledged that there was no documented or robust policy for decision-making, meeting criteria, and future treatment and care pathways when a patient was referred to the Home Treatment Team; evidence indicated that Mr Shambrook had been referred but did not meet the team’s treatment criteria.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a documented and robust policy for future treatment and care pathways following referral to the Home Treatment Team

    Wider context from the report

    “The health board (by their own admission through counsel) acknowledge that there is no documented or robust policy in relation to decision making/meeting criteria and thereafter future treatment and care pathways when a patient is referred to the Home Treatment Team ”

    Source location

    Andrew John Shambrook · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a documented and robust policy for decision-making and meeting criteria for patients referred to the Home Treatment Team

    Wider context from the report

    “The health board (by their own admission through counsel) acknowledge that there is no documented or robust policy in relation to decision making/meeting criteria and thereafter future treatment and care pathways when a patient is referred to the Home Treatment Team ”

    Source location

    Andrew John Shambrook · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress review, consultation and ratification of the Home Treatment Team Operational Policy, incorporating the coroner’s concerns and monitored through divisional and corporate governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Firstly, I can confirm that there is an approved Home Treatment Team Operational Policy (MHLD 0035) that has been in use since April 2018. However, this operational policy has exceeded its review date and we are progressing this through the review and ratification process as a priority.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide an interim policy addendum addressing the concerns identified at the inquest.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As an interim measure, MHLD have provided an addendum to the policy to ensure the concerns noted at the inquest are addressed. The addendum to the Policy will be shared across MHLD to ensure that there is consistency across all areas and I have enclosed a copy of this for your reference.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the interim policy addendum across the Mental Health and Learning Disability Division to promote consistency across services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As an interim measure, MHLD have provided an addendum to the policy to ensure the concerns noted at the inquest are addressed. The addendum to the Policy will be shared across MHLD to ensure that there is consistency across all areas and I have enclosed a copy of this for your reference.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 June 2023

    Open published response
  8. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Ann Robinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Ann Robinson died at Queen's Hospital on 8 May 2022 after taking an overdose of medication and being diagnosed with mixed drug toxicity. The principal concerns were that she was discharged from the Home Treatment Team without a medical review, comprehensive risk assessment, multidisciplinary discussion, or communication with her domiciliary care agency and family about the withdrawal of support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate withdrawal of Home Treatment Team input to domiciliary care agencies or family

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was no multi-disciplinary team discussion to ensure a safe community plan following discharge from the Home Treatment Team. There was no communication with regard to the withdrawal of the Home Treatment Team’s input, with the domiciliary care agency or family of Mrs Robinson. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann Robinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of multi-disciplinary team discussion to ensure a safe community plan following discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was no multi-disciplinary team discussion to ensure a safe community plan following discharge from the Home Treatment Team. There was no communication with regard to the withdrawal of the Home Treatment Team’s input, with the domiciliary care agency or family of Mrs Robinson. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann Robinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    The deceased had mental illness, illicit and prescribed drug misuse, homelessness and a history of contact with mental health services. She was discharged from hospital to community treatment on 13 January 2021 despite concerns about her readiness, inadequate records, risk assessments and mental state examinations, and lack of fixed accommodation. She was found in cardiac arrest on 30 January 2021 and died in hospital on 31 January 2021; the cause of the cardiac arrest could not be determined. The principal concerns included the discharge decision, incomplete clinical documentation, inadequate risk assessment, and failure to consider safeguarding.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure clinical readiness and rationale for discharge to community HBTT care

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The decision made to discharge to community HBTT care when they had indicated that the patient was not ready for supported community care and there had been no clear clinical rationale. ”

    Source location

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. West Yorkshire Western Division

    AI-generated summary

    Denton Donovan DUHANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Denton Donovan Duhaney was admitted to hospital with physical and mental health concerns and was assessed as being at high risk of further mental health deterioration. He self-discharged without assessment by the hospital’s in-house psychiatric team or notification to the community treatment team, and was found dead at home several days later; the recorded cause of death was hanging (asphyxia), with a conclusion of suicide. The substantive concerns included failures in psychiatric assessment, discharge protocol, communication about the self-discharge, and follow-up arrangements.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify the intensive home-based treatment team of a patient's self-discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “3. No one from Pinderfield’s Hospital contacted Kirklees Intensive Home Based Treatment Team to notify them of Mr Duhaney’s self discharge. ”

    Source location

    Denton Donovan DUHANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust will provide its own response regarding the hospital’s notification of the community team after self-discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Points 3 and 4 above have elements that overlap, and we have therefore responded to both below. It is understood that Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust will also provide their own response to point 3 as this can be interpreted to apply to both Trusts.”

    Source location

    2021-0200-Response-from-Fieldhead-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 June 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026