Recurring concern

Unreliable mental health referral pathways

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 4 Sep 2013•Latest report 25 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of mental health referral pathways, including identifying when referral is indicated, selecting the correct route, accepting direct referrals, making or re-making referrals, receiving and actioning referrals, and providing clear urgency or follow-up arrangements.

Not included

  • Excludes failures limited to assessment or treatment after a mental health referral has been successfully received and actioned.
  • Excludes generic social-care, occupational-health or other specialist referrals unless the report explicitly concerns the mental health referral pathway.
  • Excludes generic communication, training or documentation deficiencies that are not directly tied to making, receiving, processing or following up a mental health referral.
  • Excludes urgent mental-health referral and assessment delays where the existing dedicated urgent mental-health pathway concern is the more specific supported boundary.
Reports
110

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
136

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
173

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care19
NHS England15
HM Prison and Probation Service6
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board6
North East London NHS Foundation Trust5
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust4
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust4
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust4
College of Policing3
Department for Education3
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
Ministry of Justice3
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust3
North London NHS Foundation Trust3
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Colin BLACKBURN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Colin Blackburn died at HMP Hewell on 6 July 2019 after spending 15 days on remand and having been found with a ligature around his neck on three prior occasions. Concerns included multiple accepted failings in the management of his ACCT suicide and self-harm risk, and uncertainty about the correct process for urgent mental-health referrals, particularly at weekends.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Uncertainty among prison staff about the urgent weekend TAG referral pathway

    Wider context from the report

    “2) On 4.7.19, a prison officer, who had concerns about a significant deterioration in Mr. Blackburn’s mental state, submitted a paper TAG referral to the Mental Health team at the prison via the internal post. There was a delay in that referral reaching the Mental Team, with the result that it was not opened until after Mr. Blackburn’s death. Had it been opened sooner, the court was told that an urgent mental health assessment would have been carried out. I heard evidence from the Head of Healthcare at the prison that urgent TAG referrals currently are made by email, phone or on paper via internal post. If made late on a Friday or over a weekend, there was no guarantee that the mental health team would pick up the referral until after the weekend; instead, the referral should be made to a member of the healthcare team on duty that weekend, who would then phone Practice Plus Group’s regional on-call manager. I received no assurance that prison staff wanting to make an urgent TAG referral over a weekend knew that this was the process to follow, and heard that there is currently no divert service in place, so that if a member of staff tries to make an urgent referral by phone or email over the weekend, they are redirected to the correct pathway. The paper referral system, which relies upon the internal post at the prison, is still in place although, I am told, it can be stopped. In my view, there remains uncertainty amongst staff at the prison about the right way to make an urgent TAG referral to the mental health team, particularly at weekends. There is a risk therefore that a prisoner whose mental health deteriorates significantly during a weekend may not be properly assessed in time for action to be taken to address any risk of suicide or self-harm which he may present. ”

    Source location

    Colin BLACKBURN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display posters explaining electronic and out-of-hours TAG referral pathways throughout the prison and disseminate the notice to prison staff by global email.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. As part of this transition, posters have also been created to explain the process of making electronic TAG referrals. These are now on display (laminated, A3 size) throughout the prison. I enclose a copy of the poster with this response for your information. This work has been undertaken in conjunction with the Prison’s Health & wellbeing Governor.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add urgent mental health referral routes, service hours and escalation contact details to mental health team email signatures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. All members of the mental health team have now added the following text to their email signatures:-”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide and operate an answerphone for urgent referrals when staff lack immediate computer access, with messages logged and forwarded by the administration team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. As an alternative to the electronic referral route for such times when a prison staff member may not have immediate access to a computer, an answer phone has been purchased for the mental health team and has been in utilisation since 13th October 2021. Whilst those incoming messages will be recorded, the voicemail auto-message will be the same as the generic email out of office response (as above). The email signatures of all members of staff within the mental health team display the generic phone number, which reaches this phone (which now carries a voicemail facility). This ensures that irrespective of whether a member of the mental health team is away from his/her desk, the incoming call will be received by the admin team, for logging and forwarding as appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Specific operational queries about mental health provision at HMP Hewell should be directed to Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Practice Plus Group is the main provider of healthcare services at HMP Hewell. There is a sub-contracting arrangement in place with Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (‘MPFT’) in respect of the provision of mental health services. The Regulation 28 report was not addressed to MPFT although it has had sight of your report. This response has been prepared with the input of members of staff working for MPFT at HMP Hewell. In the event that there are any further specific operational queries relating to the mental health provision at HMP Hewell, I respectfully request that such queries be directed to MPFT.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 September 2021

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Bituin Pizzaro Pimlott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bituin Pizzaro Pimlott was found suspended from a ligature at the garage of her home on 22 February 2021. The inquest heard that she had been struggling with her mental health and that telephone consultations were used instead of face-to-face appointments during the pandemic. Concerns included the lack of referral by her GP practice to the crisis team and uncertainty about the guidance for making such referrals.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear guidance on when GPs should directly refer patients to the crisis team

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that Mrs Pimlott had been struggling with her mental health in the weeks preceding her death and had contacted her GP on a number of occasions with anxiety and depression. She was prescribed medication but expressed concerns about the impact of the medication. Telephone consultations rather than face to face appointments continued to be used with her due to the pandemic. Pre Covid it was accepted she would have been seen face to face which would have allowed a more comprehensive assessment of her mental health and her reluctance to use medication. Her GP practice did not refer her to the crisis team, and it was unclear what guidance the practice had for their GPs about when they should refer directly to the crisis team. ”

    Source location

    Bituin Pizzaro Pimlott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate telephone triage with safety netting and same-day face-to-face appointments for patients reporting mental health concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Appropriate consultations with safety netting”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport Clinical Commissioning Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 September 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate mental-health referral-options information to Stockport GP practices and distribute it to patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am satisfied that in addition to the offer of face-to-face consultations where appropriate / requested, there is a robust process of triage, to include safety netting, in circumstances where a patient presents via the telephone reporting mental health concerns. Many such patients are offered same day face-to-face appointments and an information sheet detailing options for referral has been re-circulated to all GP Practices in Stockport. This document was developed as a single sheet which can be shared with patients, setting down referral options. I have attached a copy of the document which has been delivered to every Stockport address.”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport Clinical Commissioning Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 September 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local mental health services and crisis-referral guidance are commissioned and addressed locally by the CCG, which is best placed to respond.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally in response to your secondary concern regarding unclear guidance for when GP practices should refer directly to the crisis team, I can confirm that Mental Health services are commissioned locally and to this end I note that the local CCG Medical Director has provided you with a separate response detailing relevant information and confirming steps that have been taken. The CCG are best placed to respond to this concern and they have kindly provided me with a copy of their response, the content of which I note, as well as a copy of the leaflet that has been developed and delivered to all households in the area listing the locally available Mental Health crisis facilities. I note that a reminder is also to be sent to all practices confirming the support available.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 September 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing triage and safety-netting processes adequately manage telephone mental-health presentations, including same-day assessment and referral information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Appropriate consultations with safety netting”

    Source location

    Response from Stockport Clinical Commissioning Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 September 2021

    Open published response
  3. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Anita Mandalia · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anita Mandalia took an overdose of prescribed medications at home on 7 February 2021 and died in hospital on 11 February 2021 from complications of the overdose. Concerns included prescribing beyond recommended guidance, failure to re-refer her to mental health services when concerns arose, and prescribing pain medication that gave her access to an excess of medication despite overdose-risk mitigation measures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to re-refer patients to secondary mental health services when mental health concerns arise

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Despite having received instructions within a discharge summary from a secondary mental health trust in August 2020 that required the surgery to re-refer Mrs Mandalia if concerns arose regarding her mental health, when issues were raised in October and December 2020 to the surgery no referral was made. ”

    Source location

    Anita Mandalia · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    James Kenneth Herbertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Kenneth Herbertson took his own life after being struck by a train near Crawley train station on 10 April 2019. Concerns included unsuitable discharge accommodation and failures to recognise and act on signs of a mental health relapse, including not referring him to the crisis team or providing additional support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assign responsibility for risk management and crisis referral

    Wider context from the report

    “c) His lead practitioner was not available at the time and nobody appears to have taken responsibility to manage James’ risk or make a referral to the crisis team. ”

    Source location

    James Kenneth Herbertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review daily-meeting documentation and audit clinical records to verify recording of identified risk, actions and responsible staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “from the SI investigation the Trust reviewed the documentation of daily meetings, and completed an audit of the Carenotes noted by the service to ensure adherence. The documentation had to include the identified risk, plan of action and who was undertaking the action. The updated audit of November 2020 illustrated above 97% compliance to the specified requirements.”

    Source location

    2021-0078-Response-from-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 10 · response
    Published 24 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ongoing audits of red-zone risk recording and crisis referral arrangements were considered sufficient, so no additional action was required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Serious Incident report highlights the Care and Service delivery problem that the service ‘did not appear to have considered a referral to the crisis team despite clear signs of relapse and concerns raised by family’. In addition, that ‘there was no documented evidence of this discussion’. As an action”

    Source location

    2021-0078-Response-from-Sussex-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 9 · response
    Published 24 March 2021

    Open published response
  5. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Steven Paul David Gary Stout · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Steven Paul David Gary Stout was detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act after cutting both wrists while intoxicated by alcohol, and was later admitted to a mental health ward. He was discharged on 18 October 2019 without a referral to the home treatment team and was found unresponsive, suspended by his neck from a ligature, on 4 November 2019; he could not be resuscitated. The concerns included failures to accurately record and file important medical records and to ensure an effective referral to the home treatment team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure effective referral from the ward to the community home treatment team

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The failure of Turner Ward Goodmayes hospital to ensure the effective referral of a patient from the ward to the home treatment team within the community. ”

    Source location

    Steven Paul David Gary Stout · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the HTT Service Operational Procedure to require HTT or ACAT assessment before relevant patient discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has taken into consideration concerns highlighted in the Regulation 28 report and agreed to take a number of actions to address your concerns. This includes:”

    Source location

    2021-0059 Response from North East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Clinical Handover of Care and Discharge Policy to improve discharge safety and referral completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has taken into consideration concerns highlighted in the Regulation 28 report and agreed to take a number of actions to address your concerns. This includes:”

    Source location

    2021-0059 Response from North East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 March 2021

    Open published response
  6. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    Gwilym Emrys PRICE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gwilym Emrys PRICE suffered deteriorating mental health after a physical injury and was found hanging at his home on 25 February 2020; he died later that day in hospital. Shortly before his death, his GP referred him to MPFT without using its approved referral form, which could result in incorrect prioritisation in other cases.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use the approved referral form for psychiatric referrals to MPFT

    Wider context from the report

    “shortly prior to his death Emrys was referred by his GP to the Midland Partnership Foundation NHS Trust (MPFT) because of his psychiatric presentation. The GP did not use the type of referral form approved by the MPFT. I understand this has been previously circulated with a request that it is used but this has not yet taken place. I do not believe this affected the treatment that Emrys received but in other case it could lead to referrals being given an incorrect degree of priority. ”

    Source location

    Gwilym Emrys PRICE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Link the Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust and DQS teams to ensure the latest referral form is uploaded to practice clinical systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) to link Midlands Partnership Foundation Team and the DQS Team to ensure the most up to date referral form is uploaded onto the practice clinical systems. | ████████ | 28/08/2020 | Complete”

    Source location

    2020-0141-Response-from-Clinical-Commissioning-Groups_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Upload the correct Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust referral form to all GP practice clinical systems and remove previous versions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. DQS Team to upload the correct Midlands Partnership Foundation Trust referral form onto all GP Practice clinical systems and ensure any previous versions are removed. | ████████ ████████ | 09/09/2020 |”

    Source location

    2020-0141-Response-from-Clinical-Commissioning-Groups_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Confirm to the CCGs that the correct referral form is available to all GP practices and the old version has been removed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. DQS to confirm to the CCGs that the correct referral form is now available to all GP Practices and that the old referral form has been removed. | ████████ ████████ | 09/09/2020 |”

    Source location

    2020-0141-Response-from-Clinical-Commissioning-Groups_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce and email all GP practices a standard operating procedure for removing old referral forms and managing updated versions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. CCGs and DQS Team to produce a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for removing old referral forms and managing updated versions. This will be emailed out to all GP Practices. | ████████ ████████████ ██████ | 09/09/2020 |”

    Source location

    2020-0141-Response-from-Clinical-Commissioning-Groups_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 October 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a governance-approved process across Primary Care, Commissioning and DQS for managing and appropriately updating referral forms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. The CCGs to develop a robust process within Primary Care, Commissioning and the DQS Team to ensure referral forms are managed, updated appropriately and approved through governance processes. | ████████████ ██████ ████████ | 30/09/2020 |”

    Source location

    2020-0141-Response-from-Clinical-Commissioning-Groups_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 October 2020

    Open published response
  7. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Jason Pendlebury · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jason Pendlebury, a known cocaine user, fell from the roof of a block of flats on 29 September 2018 and died in hospital on 2 October 2018 after sustaining serious injuries. The principal concerns related to communication and information-sharing between Greater Manchester Police, North West Ambulance Service, the GP and mental health professionals about his potential mental health needs and risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that referrals to mental health services are received and traceable

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that between 13 August and 22 August 2018 telephone calls were made to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) on 8 separate dates by the Deceased, his wife and his business partner. On all but one of those dates those concerns related to the Deceased's mental health. Of the calls that were made by the Deceased, the call handler reached the conclusion that he had mental health issues. On 3 of the occasions, GMP referred the matter to North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) which resulted in telephone assessments by mental health nurses. The purposes of those telephone assessments was to determine whether an ambulance should attend the Deceased. On two occasions a decision was taken that no ambulance was required. On one occasion an ambulance was dispatched although the deceased refused medical assistance and was not taken to Hospital. It was not clear from the evidence that the mental health nurses carrying out the telephone assessments were aware of the number of calls that had been made to GMP or of the previous telephone assessments. None of the calls made to GMP or the fact that telephone mental health assessments had taken place was communicated to the deceased's GP. This meant that when the Deceased's wife contacted the GP on 6th September 2018 with concerns about his threats of suicide, the GP did not have all the information that he might of had to determine what action to take. I also heard that a Multi-Agency Adult Care Safeguarding Team meeting was held at Rochdale Police Station on 28th August 2018. The Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) who attended the meeting was not provided with the full details of the telephone calls that had been made to GMP regarding the Deceased's mental health and consequently assessed the risk of harm to himself and others as low. Had the AMHP been provided with full information, it would have automatically generated a referral to the Single Point of Access and led to the involvement of the mental health services. A further contact with GMP was made on 19th September 2018 and I heard that this triggered a referral to the mental health services. However, GMP were unable to confirm what had happened to the referral and the Mental Health Trust confirmed that they had no knowledge of any referral being made. In addition, GMP did not notify the Deceased's GP that a referral to mental health services had been made. The matters of concern relate to the quality and systems of communication regarding concerns relating to potential mental health needs between GMP and NWAS and onward communication to General Practitioners and Approved Mental Health Practitioners tasked with assessing risk levels. ”

    Source location

    Jason Pendlebury · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Participate in planning and developing future Clinical Assessment Service phases, including consideration of a GMP referral pathway.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Phase 1 of the CAS has now been implemented, with further phases planned to expand this service. One of areas of expansion is to look at a referral pathway for GMP into the CAS. GMP lead, DCI Whittaker-Murray, attends the Greater Manchester Mental Health CAS planning meeting with key stakeholders, which are reviewing and developing future phases.”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Police_Redacted-2
    Page 5 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate the Greater Manchester Clinical Assessment Service referral pathway, including NWAS identification and clinical review of eligible Category 3 and 4 mental health incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Greater Manchester Clinical Assessment Service (CAS) was piloted from March-June 2019 and re-commissioned from November 2019-July 2020. In April 2020, mental health providers joined the CAS and it went live with referrals for clinically triaged patients who call”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-North-West-Ambulance-Service_Redacted-1
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    COVID-19 response demands and changing mental health services prevented organisations from fully operationalising the pan-Greater Manchester protocol at that time.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This referral process was only due to go live in 2021, but has been brought forward in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has otherwise impacted the ability of the respective organisations to operationalise the pan-GM protocol, with regards to the time commitment required and the fact that the system is in a state of flux, with significant changes being seen across mental health services. All organisations remain in a response phase to COVID-19 and a period of stability will be required for each organisation to re-assess the protocol.”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-North-West-Ambulance-Service_Redacted-1
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response
  8. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Ms Kerry Aldridge · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ms Kerry Aldridge was a student police officer who died by suicide after jumping into the path of a train at Sydenham Railway Station on 6 April 2019. The report raised concerns about the lack of established links between police Safeguarding Teams and NHS mental health teams, and about the need for further mental health training and access to non-urgent advice for officers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Referral to Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Teams depending on officers' recognition of urgency

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest, the local MPS investigation by Directorate of Professional Standards reported the view of the Central Mental Health Team that Sexual Offences Investigation Trained officers require further training in mental health. ████████ the investigating officer, gave evidence that it would be beneficial to have a mental health single point of contact within the local mental health team who could be contacted for non-urgent advice by Safeguarding Teams concerning victims that they are most concerned about. The investigation found no misconduct by officers, who provided a good level of care and support. It appears that the police Safeguarding team have no established links with NHS MH team and that referral to a Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team depends on an officer recognising the need was urgent, which may be a difficult judgment for officers, without professional mental health advice. ”

    Source location

    Ms Kerry Aldridge · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a 24-hour mental-health advice and support line for the public, police and ambulance service, staffed by mental-health professionals who can initiate rapid joint assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “South London & Maudsley NHS Trust has, since 2017, worked in partnership with the Metropolitan Police to provide a crisis and assessment service. The service enables mental health staff to work jointly with metropolitan police officers in the provision of early assessment and intervention. ████████, allocates officers to work within the Crisis and Assessment Team. The service also provides a 24 hour advice and support line to the public, 111 service, the police and London Ambulance Service. The advice line is staffed by mental health professionals who will advise officers and instigate rapid joint assessment if required. This joint arrangement between the police and South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust offers a proactive joint response to the concerns that may face police officers who may have limited knowledge in relation to mental illness.”

    Source location

    2020-0055-Response-from-South-London-and-Maudsley-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 March 2020

    Open published response
  9. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Peter Frosdick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter Frosdick, who had cirrhosis and was experiencing paranoid thinking, extreme anxiety and irrational behaviour, died by hanging in his garage. The concerns raised included that his mental health was not adequately assessed beyond his alcohol dependence, that home treatment or hospital admission was not offered or explored, and that teams appeared unfamiliar with each other’s referral criteria and dismissed his GP’s concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to refer to Wellbeing Services

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) His mental state was not classed as a psychiatric illness and since he did not fit neatly under a label he was not taken on. When seen by the Crisis Home Resolution Treatment Team, home treatment was not offered or explored. His mother states that hospital admission was not offered and a referral to Wellbeing Services should have been made but wasn't. ”

    Source location

    Peter Frosdick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Gary Leyland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Gary Leyland was found deceased in his supported accommodation on 13 November 2019 after taking excessive prescribed medication, with the inquest conclusion recording suicide and morphine toxicity. Concerns included failures to contact medical or mental health services after suicidal thoughts were disclosed, poor documentation and handover information, the use of security staff for welfare checks without clear evidence of training, and the absence of an updated risk assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to contact relevant medical or mental health services about identified concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Due to the fact Mr Leyland was residing in supported accommodation the Probation Officer reported her concerns to the Spring Street. However no attempt was made to contact any medical practitioner ie GP or mental health services. It was unclear at the conclusion of the Inquest whether there is a policy within the Probation for staff vindicating to whom concerns should be raised for example if Mr Leyland had been residing in his own home and where the risk is not believed to be imminent although clearly present. ”

    Source location

    Mr Gary Leyland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026