Recurring concern

Unreliable mental health referral pathways

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 4 Sep 2013•Latest report 25 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of mental health referral pathways, including identifying when referral is indicated, selecting the correct route, accepting direct referrals, making or re-making referrals, receiving and actioning referrals, and providing clear urgency or follow-up arrangements.

Not included

  • Excludes failures limited to assessment or treatment after a mental health referral has been successfully received and actioned.
  • Excludes generic social-care, occupational-health or other specialist referrals unless the report explicitly concerns the mental health referral pathway.
  • Excludes generic communication, training or documentation deficiencies that are not directly tied to making, receiving, processing or following up a mental health referral.
  • Excludes urgent mental-health referral and assessment delays where the existing dedicated urgent mental-health pathway concern is the more specific supported boundary.
Reports
110

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
136

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
173

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care19
NHS England15
HM Prison and Probation Service6
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board6
North East London NHS Foundation Trust5
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust4
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust4
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust4
College of Policing3
Department for Education3
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
Ministry of Justice3
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust3
North London NHS Foundation Trust3
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    MARTIN LEE TILLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Lee Tilley had a long history of substance misuse and significant mental health problems, including self-harm discussions, suicidal thoughts, and apparent visual and auditory hallucinations before his last appointment with the Homeless Healthcare Team in July 2017. He was found deceased on 17 October 2017 from the combined toxic effects of prescribed and non-prescribed medication; concerns were raised that there was no evidence of follow-up by the team after July and no answer explaining whether his presentation should have led to an emergency psychiatric assessment or referral to tertiary mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear arrangements for emergency psychiatric referral following presentations involving self-harm, suicidal thoughts or hallucinations

    Wider context from the report

    “Prior to Mr Tilley's last appointment with the psychiatric nurse (CPN) attached to the Homeless Healthcare Team in July 2017 he was talking of self-harm, had suicidal thoughts and was apparently experiencing visual and auditory hallucinations. It appears that after not attending an appointment with the CPN in July Mr Tilley was no longer seen by the team. Prior to the inquest the Homeless Healthcare Team were asked to explain the circumstances in which such a presentation would result in a referral for an emergency assessment by a psychiatrist or the tertiary mental health services. No answer to this question was forthcoming. Furthermore there was no evidence that Mr Tilley was followed up by the Homeless Healthcare Team after July 2017. ”

    Source location

    MARTIN LEE TILLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Craig David Royce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Craig Royce, who had a history of mental health problems and epilepsy, was found hanging in his prison cell on 24 December 2016. The report identified concerns that a referral to mental health services following an incident of self-harm was not made and that there was no robust documentary system for communicating such referrals. The inquest jury also considered that his risk of self-harm or suicide was not properly reviewed with appropriate precautions taken.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a reliable documentary system for communicating mental health referral information

    Wider context from the report

    “There is no form/template to deal with the situation of a prisoner who needs to be referred to the mental health service. Reliance upon the transfer of this vital information to Healthcare by means of a telephone conversation could be unreliable. A robust, simple documentary system is required for the communication of such important information, namely that a prisoner needs to be referred to mental health services for an assessment to be carried out by mental health services. This would be distinct from the TAG system which caters for a brief assessment to be relayed across. ”

    Source location

    Craig David Royce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a prison-wide written mental-health referral system, requiring written follow-up after emergency telephone referrals and providing forms electronically and on all prison wings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the matter of concern relating to the former provider of the prison healthcare service; I can confirm that since EPUT took over the service in 2017 a robust documentary system for referral of prisoners to mental health care has been put in place across the prison.”

    Source location

    2017-0379-Response-Essex-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response
  3. Somerset

    AI-generated summary

    Sofia Ann Legg · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sofia Ann Legg had a history of low mood and self-harm, received care from CAMHS, and was placed on a six-month waiting list for CBT. On 26 September 2016, her mother discovered her hanging at home, and the inquest concluded that her death was suicide. Concerns included access to CAMHS, delays in CBT, the lack of urgent psychiatric input, shortcomings in the recording and follow-up of a critical CAMHS meeting, and inappropriate language in the SIRI Report.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    High threshold for CAMHS referral

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Access to CAMHS. Sofia was rejected for referral in April 2015. Might a lower threshold and earlier proactive interventionist policy has been of positive benefits to Sofia. ”

    Source location

    Sofia Ann Legg · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a CAMHS Single Point of Access to screen referrals consistently, provide referrer advice, and monitor thresholds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1.2 Over the past year the Trust has introduced a Single Point of Access (SPA) for CAMHS and the remit has been to more consistently screen referrals, allow more time for advice and discussion with referrers and to maintain and monitor service thresholds. We believe this is making a difference by improving access as well as improving the quality of the advice and guidance that is given.”

    Source location

    2017-0293-Response-by-Somerset-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Benchmark CAMHS Tier 3 thresholds against national definitions and commissioned provision to identify whether thresholds require adjustment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1.6 As part of this review we are also currently undertaking work to benchmark our own internal threshold processes for CAMHS Tier 3, with the national definition of what a Tier 3 service is expected to provide, and with what is commissioned: to ensure that we have our threshold in the right place, and that if it is set too high that we can identify that, to ensure that we look to get the right level commissioned.”

    Source location

    2017-0293-Response-by-Somerset-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a single point of access for CAMHS referrals, with oversight, governance and signposting for referrals below the access threshold.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1.1 In line with NHS England requirements the NHS Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) commissions CAMHS in Somerset for children and young people with severe and/or persistent mental health disorders. Within the available funding (as is the case nationally) it would not be possible at the present time to lower the CAMHS threshold. Since the original referral for Sofia in April 2015, there has been a significant change regarding CAMHS provision and referral process. As was noted at the Inquest, there is now a single point of access (SPA) for CAMHS, outlining improved access for young people, families and health professionals with clear oversight and governance arrangements mandated.”

    Source location

    2017-0293-Response-by-Somerset-NHS-CCG
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited Tier 3 CAMHS capacity constrains adopting a lower referral threshold and providing earlier proactive intervention.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Access to CAMHS. Sofia was rejected for referral in April 2015. Might a lower threshold and earlier proactive interventionist policy have been of positive benefits to Sofia?”

    Source location

    2017-0293-Response-by-Somerset-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The CAMHS access threshold cannot presently be lowered because available funding is insufficient.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1.1 In line with NHS England requirements the NHS Somerset Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) commissions CAMHS in Somerset for children and young people with severe and/or persistent mental health disorders. Within the available funding (as is the case nationally) it would not be possible at the present time to lower the CAMHS threshold. Since the original referral for Sofia in April 2015, there has been a significant change regarding CAMHS provision and referral process. As was noted at the Inquest, there is now a single point of access (SPA) for CAMHS, outlining improved access for young people, families and health professionals with clear oversight and governance arrangements mandated.”

    Source location

    2017-0293-Response-by-Somerset-NHS-CCG
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response
  4. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Melvin James and Anne-Marie James · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Melvin James experienced psychotic symptoms, was admitted to hospital, and was discharged without planned psychiatric follow-up. On 8 March 2017, he fatally stabbed his sister, Anne-Marie James, injured his mother, and sustained fatal stab wounds himself. The principal concerns were missed communication about his continuing delusions, inadequate information-sharing with family, and the absence of formal referral or aftercare following discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make formal post-discharge referral or contact with community mental health services and general practitioner

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Evidence also emerged during the inquest that after discharge, there was no formal referral or contact made with Mental Health services or his General Practitioner based in the Wolverhampton area. There was no evidence of any aftercare being delivered after discharge back into the community. ”

    Source location

    Melvin James and Anne-Marie James · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Jonathan Anthony MEANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jonathan Anthony Meaney took an overdose on 13 March 2017 and was assessed at hospital, where inpatient treatment was recommended but no bed was found. He was discharged on 15 March after expressing a wish to leave and took his own life the following day; his medical cause of death was morphine and alcohol toxicity. Concerns included the prolonged wait for a bed, aspects of the pre-discharge mental health assessment, lack of consultation with another team member, and uncertainty about whether a proposed GP referral was made.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete and communicate general-practitioner referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “5. The mental health nurse who saw Mr Meaney decided to refer Mr Meaney to his general practitioner for counselling, though Mr Meaney had already said that he had not found the crisis team helpful. Then having made that decision, I heard that there was no evidence that the mental health nurse did go on to make the referral. He told me that all he would do in such a situation would be to send the GP a discharge summary, never with a short accompanying note of request. ”

    Source location

    Jonathan Anthony MEANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work closely with CANDI to assist its investigation, action-plan development and implementation to prevent similar incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It follows that the Matters of Concern will need to be addressed substantively by CANDI, which we note has received your Prevention of Future Deaths Report. We understand that CANDI are undertaking a Serious Incident investigation and we are committed to working closely with CANDI, as necessary, to assist them in completing this investigation, developing and implementing an action plan to prevent similar incidents in future and to otherwise assist them in preparing their response to your Prevention of Future Deaths Report. Additionally, we have asked to be provided with copies of CANDI’s final Serious Incident investigation report and response to your Prevention of Future Deaths Report, to ensure that any opportunities for learning within this Trust are captured and shared appropriately.”

    Source location

    2017-0244-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write GPs an accompanying note identifying any specific action required of them when the mental health liaison team sends a referral or discharge summary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Going forwards, if there is any specific action that we need a GP to carry out, the mental health liaison team will now write an accompanying note to alert the GP to the specific action and what they are required to do.”

    Source location

    2017-0244-Response2
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    CANDI, which employs and manages the Mental Health Liaison service, must substantively address the concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have carefully considered the Matters of Concern, all of which relate to care that was delivered by the Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust’s Mental Health Liaison service, based within the Royal Free Hospital Emergency Department. The staff working within the Mental Health Liaison service are employed by the Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust (“CANDI”), not this Trust (the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust), and CANDI manage the Mental Health Liaison service. If a patient attending the Trust’s Emergency Department is considered to have a mental health problem (pertinent to the attendance) or requires a mental health assessment, they are referred to the Mental Health Liaison service, which will then assess the patient and take responsibility for referring onwards to either CANDI’s inpatient facilities or another mental health trust, as appropriate.”

    Source location

    2017-0244-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 October 2017

    Open published response
  6. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Lee Joseph Hastings Swain · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lee Joseph Hastings-Swain, aged 28, was found deceased hanging from a bannister at his home on 30 November 2016. The inquest concluded that he took his own life while the balance of his mind was disturbed. Concerns included inadequate coordination and information-sharing between mental health services, delays in referral, poor clinical records, and insufficiently proactive engagement after his transfer between NHS trusts.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide coordinated direct referrals and continuity of care during mental health service transfers

    Wider context from the report

    “A more co-ordinated approach from the mental health services is required when a user is being transferred from one NHS Trust to another. In this case if the user had still been on a Care Programme Approach there would have been a direct referral from service to service rather than through the GP but because he was taken off the programme the referral was made through the GP. This has delayed the intervention and the prevented effective information exchange on a user who was already subject to secondary care services. In effect this resulted in the user having no intervention for a number of months and entering the mental health system afresh when in fact the care should have been a seamless continuation. ”

    Source location

    Lee Joseph Hastings Swain · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Ms Abigail Baynham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ms Abigail Baynham had a history of suicidal ideation and was found deceased at her flat after taking her own life. The inquest heard that no further referral to the Mental Health Liaison Service was made when she left hospital, which may have led to a further assessment of her mental state and risk of self-harm.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make further referrals back to the Mental Health Liaison Service after hospital discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that when Ms Baynham had left hospital on the 22 November 2017, there was no further referral made back to Mental Health Liaison Service. This may have triggered a further assessment about her mental state and risk of self-harm. ”

    Source location

    Ms Abigail Baynham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    John WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Williams hanged himself while he was a prisoner at HM Prison Pentonville, after telling staff that he would do so if his perceived needs were not met rather than intending to take his life. Concerns included inaccuracies and omissions in reception screening and referrals, inadequate understanding and use of the ACCT document, insufficient training for some support staff, confusion about emergency codes, and a lack of basic first aid and CPR training among prison officers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make mental health team referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The first reception nurse did not make the referral to the mental health team (though this took place in any event because the court diversion team had already made the referral). I heard that it is now done automatically when that box is ticked on the system, and I wonder whether other prison healthcare providers would benefit from such a system. ”

    Source location

    John WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigate the First Reception Health Screen referral process and associated templates to identify how referral completion can be enforced.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you heard in evidence, we have investigated the process with regard to the templates and referrals to mental health as part of the First Reception Health Screen and whether it would be possible to not being able to pass onto a second page until the task has been completed.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 April 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a revised mandatory First Reception Health Screen template requiring confirmation of mental-health referral and electronically refer directly to the mental-health in-reach team at HMP Pentonville.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The investigation has been completed and the template has been changed at HMP Pentonville with immediate effect. It is now a mandatory box to say if a Mental Health referral is required and that one has been made. The referral is then made electronically directly to the mental health in-reach team. As of Friday 24 March 2017, this revised template is being followed at HMP Pentonville.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 April 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider implementing the revised First Reception Health Screen template at all prisons where Care UK conducts the assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The investigation has been completed and the template has been changed at HMP Pentonville with immediate effect. It is now a mandatory box to say if a Mental Health referral is required and that one has been made. The referral is then made electronically directly to the mental health in-reach team. As of Friday 24 March 2017, this revised template is being followed at HMP Pentonville.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 April 2017

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Thomas Josef Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thomas Josef Green died at home on 10 June 2016; the medical cause of death was asphyxiation secondary to hanging, and the inquest concluded that he had taken his own life. The principal concerns related to unclear or unactioned psychiatric referral, lack of psychiatric follow-up and treatment for complex PTSD after discharge, referral to an unsuitable service, and a commissioning gap for complex PTSD services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider and action referrals to Adult General Psychiatry

    Wider context from the report

    “1. It was unclear why a referral was made to Adult General Psychiatry whilst Mr Green remained an inpatient, there was no evidence that this referral was ever considered or actioned. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Josef Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient detail in GP referral documentation to identify case complexity

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The Court heard evidence that the referral document completed by the GP was not particularly detailed and therefore the complexity of the case was not apparent and the case was accepted. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Josef Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inappropriate referral of complex PTSD presentations to Healthy Minds

    Wider context from the report

    “3. When a referral was made this was made to Healthy Minds. The Court heard evidence how this was not a case which was suitable for Healthy Minds as it was complex and involved potentially complex PTSD. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Josef Green · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and establish clear mental-health support pathways for people with complex needs, identify gaps, and take findings forward in commissioning intentions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The CCG will work with PCFT and GPs to review and establish clear pathways into MH support for people with complex needs. This will identify any gaps which will be taken forward within commissioning intentions. We have commenced this work already and aim to conclude it within four months.”

    Source location

    2017-0057-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-CCG-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 March 2017

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Rachal Marie Murphy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rachal Marie Murphy died at home on 8 September 2015 after taking medication prescribed to other family members; the medical cause of death was recorded as acute hypoxia due to morphine overdose, and the conclusion was that she had taken her own life. The report identified concerns about fragmented inter-agency care, failures and delays in referrals and investigations, overlooked CAF documentation, and delays in Early Help case allocation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity about referral routes and acceptance by Psychological services

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was a lack of understanding between medical professionals as to the means by which someone could be referred to Psychological services and whether there was a unclear message from Psychological services as to whether they were accepting referrals. ”

    Source location

    Rachal Marie Murphy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding of cases suitable for CAMHS referral

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Lack of understanding amongst medical professionals as to the cases which may or may not be suitable for referral to CAMHS. ”

    Source location

    Rachal Marie Murphy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Manage Healthy Young Minds referrals through a single point of entry and allocate them according to children’s needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the Trust’s quality improvement work during early 2016 the Trust implemented a new referral process for all aspects of Tameside and Glossop Healthy Young Minds Services (formally CAMHS). All referrals are now managed via one single point of entry and then allocated to a range of possible professionals dependant on the child/young person’s needs e.g. Psychologists, Nurse, Psychiatrist or 3rd sector services. This allows for greater clarity and understanding of where to direct requests for help to for all professionals.”

    Source location

    2016-0401-Responses
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce and widely disseminate a Healthy Young Minds service offer document explaining referrals, advice access and appropriate referral problems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust have also produced a service offer document which details, how to make a referral, how to contact the service for advice and importantly the document contains information of the types of problems that are appropriate to refer to Tameside and”

    Source location

    2016-0401-Responses
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand the service offer document to name a contact for paediatric colleagues seeking advice and consultation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The document has just recently been reviewed and will be expanded to provide a named contact for colleagues in the Paediatric medical services to contact for advice and consultation. The Trust believes that this addresses the confusion and lack of understanding that you have identified in relation to Rachel’s care and treatment.”

    Source location

    2016-0401-Responses
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make written CAMHS referrals whenever paediatricians have reasonable cause for concern, without filtering referrals or predicting acceptance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust have in response to this case, made changes to their practices to ensure that referrals to CAMHS are made in writing in any case where the Consultant Paediatrician has reasonable cause for concern in respect of a child’s psychological wellbeing. The Consultants no longer filter referrals through Pennine Care staff nor do they consider the likely acceptance of referrals before making them. The referral is made and it is for CAMHS to determine how to proceed. I am informed that this change in approach has been successful to date with CAMHS appearing to be accepting more referrals in response.”

    Source location

    2016-0401-Responses
    Page 6 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apply epilepsy mental-health safeguards through tailored care plans, specialist nurse review and liaison, CAMHS referral, and immediate admission for high-risk self-harm or suicide concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust now have in place a number of safeguards to ensure that where a child being treated for epilepsy exhibits signs that may be consistent with mental health issues, that they are managed and referred to the appropriate organisation.”

    Source location

    2016-0401-Responses
    Page 6 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust disputes that medical professionals lacked understanding of CAMHS referrals, stating evidence showed the process was understood.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As indicated to you in a letter from our solicitors dated 30 August, it was the Trust’s contention that during the course of the inquest there was in fact no evidence to suggest a lack of understanding in relation to CAMHS referrals and where evidence perhaps suggested that knowledge was limited, the Trust demonstrated that practices have now changed. I understand that the Trust’s Consultant Paediatrician gave clear evidence that a CAMHS referral was not made by him in March 2015, not because he was unsure of the process, but because he knew how the process works and understood that without evidence of a more acute mental health problem, the referral would be refused (which it ultimately was) and it was therefore important to look at other avenues of how to manage Rachal’s behaviour.”

    Source location

    2016-0401-Responses
    Page 6 · response
    Published 19 February 2017

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026