Recurring concern

Unreliable mental health referral pathways

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 4 Sep 2013•Latest report 25 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of mental health referral pathways, including identifying when referral is indicated, selecting the correct route, accepting direct referrals, making or re-making referrals, receiving and actioning referrals, and providing clear urgency or follow-up arrangements.

Not included

  • Excludes failures limited to assessment or treatment after a mental health referral has been successfully received and actioned.
  • Excludes generic social-care, occupational-health or other specialist referrals unless the report explicitly concerns the mental health referral pathway.
  • Excludes generic communication, training or documentation deficiencies that are not directly tied to making, receiving, processing or following up a mental health referral.
  • Excludes urgent mental-health referral and assessment delays where the existing dedicated urgent mental-health pathway concern is the more specific supported boundary.
Reports
110

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
136

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
173

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care19
NHS England15
HM Prison and Probation Service6
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board6
North East London NHS Foundation Trust5
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust4
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust4
Surrey and Borders Partnership NHS Foundation Trust4
College of Policing3
Department for Education3
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
Ministry of Justice3
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust3
North London NHS Foundation Trust3
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Caitlin Rachel Imber ("Caiti") · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Caitlin Rachel Imber (“Caiti”) died on 13 December 2022; the recorded cause of death was hanging. The report raises concern about a 42-day delay in progressing a CAMHS referral after missing contact information was not followed up, although it states that this was not contributory to Caiti’s death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in progressing referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “On the 9th of May 2022, CAMHS received a referral from a community paediatrician dated the 19th of April 2022. This identified the need for support care and treatment to be provided to a traumatized, vulnerable child, however as the referral did not contain any contact numbers, the referral was closed without any additional enquiries being made to further the matter. A further referral was received on the 31st of May 2022 and was then accepted by CAMHS, representing a delay of 42 days from the original paediatrician’s referral to any action being taken. Whilst this was not contributory to Caiti’s death, I am concerned by the apparent lack of effort to locate missing information and progress a referral and I consider that if this situation continues to prevail, then there is a risk that future deaths could occur. ”

    Source location

    Caitlin Rachel Imber ("Caiti") · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make additional enquiries to locate missing referral information

    Wider context from the report

    “On the 9th of May 2022, CAMHS received a referral from a community paediatrician dated the 19th of April 2022. This identified the need for support care and treatment to be provided to a traumatized, vulnerable child, however as the referral did not contain any contact numbers, the referral was closed without any additional enquiries being made to further the matter. A further referral was received on the 31st of May 2022 and was then accepted by CAMHS, representing a delay of 42 days from the original paediatrician’s referral to any action being taken. Whilst this was not contributory to Caiti’s death, I am concerned by the apparent lack of effort to locate missing information and progress a referral and I consider that if this situation continues to prevail, then there is a risk that future deaths could occur. ”

    Source location

    Caitlin Rachel Imber ("Caiti") · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Change the CAMHS operating procedure to offer appointments when referral contact numbers are missing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm that CAMHS have changed their standard operating procedure, and an appointment is now offered even where contact numbers are not provided. This change was made following completion of the investigation and ensures all referrals receive an appointment.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit CAMHS practice to confirm the revised referral procedure is embedded.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The service is also undertaking an audit to confirm the changes that have been made are embedded in practice.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response
  2. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Naomi Aylott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Naomi Aylott died on 12 September 2024 after jumping from a railway bridge with the intent to end her own life, following a period of poor mental health and previous suicide attempts. Concerns included that she was not seen face to face by her care co-ordinator, formal risk assessments and care planning were not completed, risk-assessment training and auditing were inadequate, and family involvement during telephone-based care had not been properly considered.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to refer or transfer care to the geographically appropriate community mental health team

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I am concerned that Naomi was never seen face to face by her care co-ordinator over the 3 – 4 month period that she was under the care of the CMHT. I heard evidence that the Andover CMHT, in particular, was impacted by a change in the way that primary care networks (PCNs) refer patients to secondary services. Due to Naomi’s GP surgery being within a particular PCN she was referred to the Andover CMHT even though she lived in Four Marks, a 40-50 minute drive from Andover. This is much further than would have been the case had Naomi come under the care of the Winchester CMHT. The Andover CMHT has not been able to arrange as many face to face appointments with care co-ordinators due to the time they would have to spend travelling. Naomi’s care was not referred to the Winchester CMHT originally nor was it transferred from the Andover to the Winchester CMHT after the referral was accepted. ”

    Source location

    Naomi Aylott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Redirect rural patients to Winchester-based community mental health staff through new locality working arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Andover CMHT in particular, does cover a large geographical area and we recognise that this poses a logistical challenge for patients to be seen face to face. This has arisen as a result of the catchment area being defined by the externally allocated Primary Care Networks. We accept that this is not ideal and are actively taking steps to address this so that patients living in more rural parts of the area, as Naomi was, can instead be seen by staff based at a Winchester clinic. I expect these new ways of working to be fully implemented by January 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 October 2025

    Open published response
  3. North Yorkshire and York

    AI-generated summary

    Victoria Anne TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Victoria Anne Taylor’s mental health deteriorated between May and October 2024, involving suicidal ideation, self-harm and binge drinking. She was reported missing on 1 October 2024, and her body was recovered from the River Derwent on 22 October 2024. The principal concerns were that mental health services did not offer a treatment pathway addressing reported childhood trauma, provided limited safety planning, and did not suggest or convene a multi-agency approach despite knowing that several agencies were involved.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to explain the rationale, provision and NHS alternatives for a private psychotherapy referral

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms Taylor was assessed on three separate occasions between mid-May 2024 and the end of August 2024 by members of the Crisis and Acute Hospitals Liaison Teams. Ms Taylor was clear during all three assessments that her episodes of binge drinking and impulsive acts of self harm were the result of unresolved childhood trauma. Despite that, secondary mental health services considered there was no role for them in offering support or a treatment pathway to her. The safety plans agreed following these assessments were therefore limited and offered Ms Taylor no additional support beyond that which she was already accessing through the Horizons service. The assessment documents contained no discussion of treatment pathways for addressing trauma which might be accessed through the Community Mental Health Team, and no indication that such pathways had been offered to Ms Taylor and rejected by her. Instead, it was suggested at the second assessment that Ms Taylor may wish to refer herself to a named private psychotherapy service at some point in the future. There was no rationale included in the second assessment for naming this service, and no explanation of what it might provide or why this could not be offered on the NHS via the CMHT. When Ms Taylor indicated at her third assessment that she had left a message with this private provider and received no response from them, the third safety plan simply suggested she try again. Mental Health services were aware at the time of the second and third assessments that a number of agencies were involved with Ms Taylor, but no multi-agency meeting or approach was suggested or called by them to consider the most appropriate support for Ms Taylor. ”

    Source location

    Victoria Anne TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide an effective alternative when a referred provider does not respond

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms Taylor was assessed on three separate occasions between mid-May 2024 and the end of August 2024 by members of the Crisis and Acute Hospitals Liaison Teams. Ms Taylor was clear during all three assessments that her episodes of binge drinking and impulsive acts of self harm were the result of unresolved childhood trauma. Despite that, secondary mental health services considered there was no role for them in offering support or a treatment pathway to her. The safety plans agreed following these assessments were therefore limited and offered Ms Taylor no additional support beyond that which she was already accessing through the Horizons service. The assessment documents contained no discussion of treatment pathways for addressing trauma which might be accessed through the Community Mental Health Team, and no indication that such pathways had been offered to Ms Taylor and rejected by her. Instead, it was suggested at the second assessment that Ms Taylor may wish to refer herself to a named private psychotherapy service at some point in the future. There was no rationale included in the second assessment for naming this service, and no explanation of what it might provide or why this could not be offered on the NHS via the CMHT. When Ms Taylor indicated at her third assessment that she had left a message with this private provider and received no response from them, the third safety plan simply suggested she try again. Mental Health services were aware at the time of the second and third assessments that a number of agencies were involved with Ms Taylor, but no multi-agency meeting or approach was suggested or called by them to consider the most appropriate support for Ms Taylor. ”

    Source location

    Victoria Anne TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Jessica Lynda Smithson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jessica Lynda Smithson, aged 27, died by suicide after contacting a crisis text mental health service following an alleged serious sexual assault. The service did not contact the Metropolitan Police despite messages indicating an immediate risk to her life. The report identified concerns about inconsistent procedures among charity crisis text services and the absence of a commissioned crisis text mental health service in Greater Manchester.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of crisis text services to use Greater Manchester mental health pathways for early referral

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Within the Greater Manchester Area there is no commissioned crisis text mental health support service. Whilst GM residents can message national services, often the location of an individual texter will not be known. The court heard from Greater Manchester Police that they receive a significant number of referrals which have been sent by this crisis service to the Metropolitan Police, almost one a day where there has been a real and immediate risk to a person’s life identified. All of these referrals require an immediate police response (they are outside of Right Care Right Person). If there was a GM commissioned service, it is likely that any search for the location of the individual would be done by GMP and would shorten the timeframe in which they could respond to the risk. In addition, a GM commissioned service would have a greater understanding of local pathways in order to refer people who may have a deteriorating mental health before they reached the point of crisis. ”

    Source location

    Jessica Lynda Smithson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a phased, locally delivered crisis-text service integrated with the Greater Manchester 111 mental-health crisis line.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS GM alongside the mental health trusts have considered options for the provision of crisis text services and are currently considering our preferred model through our Greater Manchester Mental Health Clinical Effectiveness Group (CEG) as our established clinical governance route. Our preferred model is for a text service to be incorporated into the Greater Manchester 111 Mental Health crisis line service so that texts are handled by Greater Manchester Mental Health First Responders based within the team.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The non-NHS charity’s service delivery and clinical governance arrangements fall outside the respondent’s ability to comment on.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We would suggest the Coroner’s Office approaches the charity directly for further information about the support provided, if required. As this is a non-NHS provider, we are unable to comment on their service delivery arrangements or clinical governance processes.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Independent charitable organisations providing crisis text services are outside Government and NHS control.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I hope you will understand that charitable organisations providing crisis text services are independent of both Government and the NHS.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2025

    Open published response
  5. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Kaine Regan FLETCHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kaine Regan FLETCHER, a 26-year-old man with paranoid personality disorder and a history of substance misuse, died on 3 July 2022 after restraint by police, developing rhabdomyolysis, multi-system organ failure and cardiac arrest. The report raises concerns about the lack of joined-up policies and cross-sector working on acute behavioural disturbance and section 136 detentions, police and ambulance conveyance practices and training, the availability of out-of-hours street triage, and gaps in services for people with combined mental health and substance misuse conditions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reliance on unrealistic self-referral for people requiring mental health and substance misuse support

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Mental Health Services – ‘the gap’ I am concerned that there is a ‘gap’ in mental health services for those people who have a dual diagnosis of a recognised mental health condition, combined with a substance misuse diagnosis. Clinically, I understand that substance misuse can provide a barrier to effective treatment of any mental health condition. However, I have heard evidence that there is no service available to patients for management, monitoring and treatment in circumstances where they are unable to abstain from substances but require care for the residual mental health condition. In circumstances where it is clinically recognised that substance misuse can exacerbate the symptoms of many mental health conditions, this gives risk to a clear risk of future death. The evidence that I have heard is that once treatment or referral options for these patients have been exhausted, they are discharged from the Local Mental Health Team with signposting to other services e.g. substance misuse services/charities or CRISIS. These services often required self-referral, which is not realistic for many people in these circumstances. Kaine fell into this gap, and I am concerned that there is a risk of future death for other patients if this gap is not filled. Again, it seems to me that this is an issue of national concern. ”

    Source location

    Kaine Regan FLETCHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a dedicated electronic-system referral pathway for dual-diagnosis support before patient discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The introduction of an additional three staff members and the service having its own referral pathway on the patient electronic system means that prior to any discharge, the core LMHT would be able to see the person is accessing the co-located practitioners and therefore consider any post discharge needs and liaison. As we have now established the workers within teams the staff are also embedded as part of the internal escalation meetings and processes should there be a requirement to escalate any concerns around discharge planning or unmet care needs.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update internal working instructions on staff expectations for supporting people who need self-referral to other services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A key area of concern was also identified in relation to people that have an identified need which can be met by another service or organisation, such as third sector or voluntary services, and the process of self-referral. Whilst services work collaboratively with people, we recognise that it is not always realistic for some people to complete the appropriate self-referral processes and time is often dedicated by staff to do this however we have updated our team’s Internal Working Instructions which outlines the expectation of staff and services to ensure that this is clear. We will also be sharing and discussing this learning within a planned learning event to further support awareness and practice change.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share and discuss self-referral learning at a planned learning event to support awareness and practice change.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A key area of concern was also identified in relation to people that have an identified need which can be met by another service or organisation, such as third sector or voluntary services, and the process of self-referral. Whilst services work collaboratively with people, we recognise that it is not always realistic for some people to complete the appropriate self-referral processes and time is often dedicated by staff to do this however we have updated our team’s Internal Working Instructions which outlines the expectation of staff and services to ensure that this is clear. We will also be sharing and discussing this learning within a planned learning event to further support awareness and practice change.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 July 2025

    Open published response
  6. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Sophie Ann Louise Cotton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sophie Ann Louise Cotton had a long history of mental health problems and previous suicide attempts. On 6 January 2025, after she failed to attend important family contact and could not be contacted, four calls were made to the police requesting a welfare check; shortly afterwards, her family found her hanging by a ligature at home. The principal concerns were refusals or delays in police attendance under the “Right Care, Right Person” procedure, including where callers expressed a real and immediate risk to life and where mental health services could not enter locked premises.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to account for mental health crisis team inability to enter locked premises when directing callers to mental health services

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) During the 16:44 call the “Right Care, Right Person” advice to contact mental health services appears to have disregarded the fact that the mental health crisis team do not have the power to enter locked premises and so would require police attendance to facilitate entry to the premises. ”

    Source location

    Sophie Ann Louise Cotton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor and work with partners on powers of entry so agencies understand legal parameters and available options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Ongoing monitoring and work is being undertaken with partners with regards to powers of entry to ensure all partners are aware of the legal parameters in which all agencies operate, including for all agencies to understand the specific legal powers available to them, and to ensure all options are being considered.”

    Source location

    Response from College of Policing
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Collate concerns raised, review them against the toolkit and guidance, and amend the toolkit where necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The College collates all information in respect of concerns that are raised, and reviews these against the toolkit and guidance provided to forces. The toolkit is subject to ongoing review and where necessary amendments will be made. The College continues to encourage forces to follow the guidance within their development of RCRP and provides ongoing support and advice to forces.”

    Source location

    Response from College of Policing
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue reviewing toolkit content and provide forces with tools, training and support to implement and deliver Right Care, Right Person.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The concerns raised will also be communicated with all forces within the national tactical delivery Board, where learning can be shared. The College continually reviews the content of the toolkit guidance to ensure forces are provided with the tools, training, and support to effectively implement and deliver RCRP.”

    Source location

    Response from College of Policing
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A review found no significant failings in the use or implementation of the Right Care Right Person policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A thorough review has since taken place and although it has not highlighted any significant failings in the use of, and implementation of the ‘Right Care Right Person’ (RCRP) policy, the review of the incident(s) has resulted in two specific points of organisational learning and recommendations to be implemented and progressed. Durham Constabulary has also consulted with the national mental health co-ordinator to ensure the response is aligned to national practice.”

    Source location

    Response from Durham Police and Crime Commissioner
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operational decisions and responses under Right Care, Right Person are the responsibility of individual police forces, including Durham Constabulary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to the operational elements and decision-making processes, we have been in contact with Durham Constabulary and understand that a full response to these points is being provided.”

    Source location

    Response from College of Policing
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Police cannot enter a person’s home for a welfare check where assessed risk does not reach the threshold of risk to life and limb.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The College RCRP guidance reaffirms the position as set out within the case of Syed v DPP [2010] EWHC 81 (Admin) in relation to the powers of entry available to the police. The toolkit states ‘There is no specific power of entry to carry out a concern for welfare check…’”

    Source location

    Response from College of Policing
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 May 2025

    Open published response
  7. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Marta Elena Vento · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marta Elena Vento was working alone as a hotel receptionist in Bournemouth when she was fatally beaten in an unprovoked attack on 9 December 2020. The report raises concerns about the sharing of remand prisoners’ risk information with sentencing courts, continuity of mental healthcare after release from prison, risk assessment of violent offenders managed by MOSOVO units, and access to patient information through the National Record Locator.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of some mental healthcare trusts to accept referrals for homeless prisoners on release

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was given that this is not the process nationally in that some mental healthcare trusts will not accept a referral if a person is homeless. There is no national guidance about the continuity of care for prisoners upon release from prison when homeless. I am concerned that this lack of continuity of care could lead to future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Marta Elena Vento · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide RECONNECT care-after-custody support and release planning to improve continuity of care for people leaving prison.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support this approach when individuals are leaving prison, there are services in place such as RECONNECT, a non-clinical ‘care after custody’ service that seeks to improve the continuity of care of individuals with identified health needs, by working with them before they leave the secure estate. RECONNECT supports transition to community-based services, enabling the safeguarding of health gains made whilst in the secure estate, with the aim of helping to reduce inequalities and address health-related drivers of offending behaviours.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and refresh the prison mental health service specification, using case learning to strengthen continuity and transfer of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “While there are no plans currently to develop national pathway guidance, NHS England will be considering this in the longer-term, working with the Adult Mental Health Team to ensure services are able to fully support those leaving prison.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider developing national pathway guidance with adult mental health services for people leaving prison.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At present, there is no specific national pathway guidance setting out what an individual on release can expect from their local Community Mental Health Team (CMHT). The guidance relating to the Adult Mental Health Team is generic rather than focused on the prison population.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    There are currently no plans to develop specific national pathway guidance for people leaving prison, although this may be considered longer-term.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At present, there is no specific national pathway guidance setting out what an individual on release can expect from their local Community Mental Health Team (CMHT). The guidance relating to the Adult Mental Health Team is generic rather than focused on the prison population.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Hayley Joanne BEAVINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Slightly before 1am on 21 September 2024, Hayley Joanne Beavington jumped from the fifth-floor balcony of her home and died by suicide after being discharged from hospital the previous day. The substantive concerns relate to the failure to secure a place for her at a local crisis house despite concerns about cuckooing and a view that she was definitely at risk of suicide, and the lack of instructions to challenge that decision.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in reattempting crisis-house placement after a disputed refusal

    Wider context from the report

    “When planning for Ms Beavington’s discharge from hospital, it was agreed that the best place for her to go was a local crisis house. Upon application, the foundation year 1 doctor (FY1) was told by the crisis house team that this was not possible because: - Ms Beavington had secure accommodation; and - she was no longer actively suicidal. This was despite the fact that: - there was a strong suspicion that Ms Beavington was the victim of cuckooing in her own home; and - the team view was that she was definitely at risk of suicide. The consultant psychiatrist in charge of Ms Beavington’s care did not give the FY1 any instructions as to how to challenge the decision that the consultant believed was wrong. Instead, the consultant instructed the FY1 to leave it for three days and then just try again in the same way. By this time, Ms Beavington decided that she had waited too long and did not want another attempt to be made. Ms Beavington was discharged home and killed herself at 1am the next morning. ”

    Source location

    Hayley Joanne BEAVINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require senior clinical review, an alternative plan, documented accountability and formal escalation before finalising any declined crisis house referral.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All declined referrals must now be escalated for senior clinical review before a final decision is made; this will ensure that no referral is left without further review and will seek to reduce the risk of missed opportunities for intervention.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide clinicians with 24/7 Crisis Hub access to senior clinical advice for urgent escalation and referral guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Crisis Hub Health Professional Line now provides 24/7 access for clinicians needing urgent escalation or referral guidance. This guarantees that immediate support is available, reducing the risk of delays.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The referring team is responsible for reviewing declined referrals and agreeing an alternative plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The pathway has been reviewed to make it clear that in the event of a referral being declined it is the responsibility of the referring team to review and agree an alternative plan.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 25 February 2025

    Open published response
  9. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Shaun Kenny HALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shaun Hall had mixed anxiety, depressive disorder and emotionally unstable personality disorder, and was found deceased on 14 December 2023 after hanging himself. A referral to the Urgent Care and Assessment Team was declined despite information about escalating factors and his statement that he would take his own life if not allowed to see his children. The identity of the person who declined the referral was unknown and no notes were made of it.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify the person declining a referral

    Wider context from the report

    “The assessment from Talking Therapies on 20 November 2023 identified current escalating factors around not being allowed to see his children, and an upcoming court case in relation to this on 14 December 2023. Indeed he stated that if he was not allowed to see his children he would take his own life. Despite all this information being available the Urgent Care and Assessment Team did not accept the referral. Of grave concern is that the identity of the person at the Urgent Care and Assessment Team who declined the referral is not known and no notes were made of the referral. ”

    Source location

    Shaun Kenny HALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Extend web-based call handling and recording systems to UCAT services and train staff to use them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have heard the concerns you raised and have elected to expand the use of call handling and recording systems within the Trust to our Crisis Services. We currently use a web-based call handling product within our response hub and have begun the process of extending the product into the UCAT services. By the end of July 2025, we anticipate that we will have trained all staff in the use of this product. This product will improve the accuracy of our record keeping and our ability to provide reflective interventions with staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 January 2025

    Open published response
  10. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Taylor was under police investigation and, within a fortnight of learning that criminal charges had been authorised, intentionally took a large quantity of prescription medication and was found deceased at home on 3 January 2024. The report raises a concern that suspects interviewed voluntarily are not automatically referred to mental health services, with only welfare assessments by the investigating officer and no healthcare involvement.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to automatically refer suspects interviewed voluntarily for relevant offences to mental health services

    Wider context from the report

    “When a suspect is arrested for offences requiring a referral to a mental health nurse, commonly referred to in Nottinghamshire as “Liaison and Diversion” the custody sergeant makes that referral automatically, which allows the opportunity for a suspect to obtain assistance from a healthcare professional, if they desire. In addition, there are welfare assessments conducted by the officer in charge of the investigation. In cases where a suspect is interviewed on a voluntary basis for relevant offences, the suspect is not dealt with at a custody suite and a referral to a mental health nurse is not automatic. In this latter scenario, only welfare assessments are completed by the officer in charge of the investigation without any involvement from healthcare services. ”

    Source location

    Paul Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise procedures so voluntary and arrested suspects receive consistent welfare assessments and automatic Liaison and Diversion referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A policy revision is being undertaken to ensure that the procedures for supporting and safeguarding suspects of relevant offences are consistent, irrespective of whether the individual has been arrested or invited for voluntary attendance. In both scenarios, suspects receive an officer welfare assessment together with an automatic referral to Liaison and Diversion (healthcare services). The amendment to the policy and communication to the organisation will be implemented by 1st March 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire Police
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate the amended safeguarding policy across the organisation by 1 March 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A policy revision is being undertaken to ensure that the procedures for supporting and safeguarding suspects of relevant offences are consistent, irrespective of whether the individual has been arrested or invited for voluntary attendance. In both scenarios, suspects receive an officer welfare assessment together with an automatic referral to Liaison and Diversion (healthcare services). The amendment to the policy and communication to the organisation will be implemented by 1st March 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire Police
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 January 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026