Recurring concern

Failure to provide individualised pregnancy and birth risk assessment and planning

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 14 Oct 2013•Latest report 5 Nov 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in pregnancy and birth risk assessment and planning where the report concerns individualised or holistic identification, communication, escalation, or management of risks to determine an appropriate birth plan, timing, or mode of delivery.

Not included

  • Excludes generic failures in training, documentation, staffing, communication, or continuity that are not specifically tied to pregnancy and birth risk assessment and planning.
  • Excludes consent or risk-discussion deficiencies that do not concern the assessment and planning of pregnancy or birth risks.
  • Excludes failures concerning unrelated clinical risk assessments, medication dosing, monitoring, or other safety processes.
Reports
11

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
14

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
13

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care6
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists3
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2
Royal College of Midwives2
Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust1
Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust1
George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust1
Health Services Safety Investigations Body1
NHS England1
Nursing and Midwifery Council1
Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust1
South Central Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust1
the Princess Alexandra Hospital NHS Trust1
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust1
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Jennifer Cahill and Agnes Cahill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jennifer Cahill died in hospital on 4 June 2024 after post-partum haemorrhage, a fourth-degree perineal tear and cardiac arrest following a home birth. Her daughter, Agnes Cahill, was born on 2 June 2024, required resuscitation after complications during birth, and died in neonatal intensive care on 7 June 2024. The report identified concerns including failures in antenatal planning, fetal monitoring, resuscitation and post-birth care, as well as the absence of national guidance and a robust framework for supporting higher-risk home births.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to personalise and individualise pregnancy and birth risk assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “6. Terminology around pregnancies describes them as ‘high’ or ‘low risk pregnancy’ and leads women to consider that pregnancy encompasses all stages through to delivery of a child. Practice does not personalise or individualise risk so women can fully understand what the level of risk is for them in actually being pregnant, or what the level of risk is for them in giving birth. ”

    Source location

    Jennifer Cahill and Agnes Cahill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contribute to the task and finish group on national homebirth guidance, frameworks, ethical proportionality, informed risk discussions, maternal risks, terminology and training needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As the professional regulator for midwives in the UK, the NMC plans to play an active role in the group in line with our regulatory role. More specifically, we propose to take the following actions in response to the matters of concern detailed in your report as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from Nursing & Midwifery Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ask all NHS maternity providers to urgently review the safety and quality of their homebirth services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On 26 November 2025, NHS England wrote to all NHS maternity providers in England asking them to urgently review the safety and quality of their homebirth services. In particular, we have urged them to consider the following issues which were highlighted in your Report:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require trusts to implement risk assessment at each pregnancy contact, including ongoing review of intended place of birth.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For all women, communication around risk should be personalised. Donna Ockenden, in her review of the maternity services at Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, made it clear that staff must ensure that women undergo a risk assessment at each contact throughout the pregnancy pathway and that “risk assessment must include ongoing review of the intended place of birth.” NHS England asked Trusts to implement this at the time. All pregnant women should also be offered a personalised care and support plan where such information is recorded, alongside the decisions they make about their care.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support obstetricians to provide women with information enabling informed choices about care during pregnancy, birth and the postnatal period.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. Terminology around pregnancies describes them as ‘high’ or ‘low risk pregnancy’ and leads women to consider that pregnancy encompasses all stages through to delivery of a child. Practice does not personalise or individualise risk so women can fully understand what the level of risk is for them in actually being pregnant, or what the level of risk is for them in giving birth.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Promote professional learning through member communications and resources on risk escalation, informed consent and safe decision-making for complex births.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The RCM supports and promotes professional learning through member communications and resources, highlighting the importance of risk escalation and informed consent in line with existing RCM guidance such as Care Outside Guidance (2022) and Standing up for High Standards (2022) and the Nursing and Midwifery Council (2025) Principles for supporting women’s choices in maternity care.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Midwives
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Advocate for clear national frameworks supporting consistent, individualised communication of maternal and neonatal risks across maternity settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The RCM acknowledges that national consistency in discussing risk, including rare outcomes, requires system-level guidance. The RCM continues to advocate for clear national frameworks to support consistent, high-quality risk communication across all maternity settings, with dedicated funding and protected time for implementation.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Midwives
    Page 4 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Current NICE intrapartum guidance appropriately covers home births, and insufficient evidence justifies changing its recommendations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Intrapartum care (NG235) covers assessment in the first stage of labour in any setting, including the observations of the mother and the unborn baby that should lead to the transfer of the woman to obstetric-led care, noting also that multiple risk factors may increase the urgency of the transfer, particularly if they have a cumulative effect. The guideline notes the more frequent observations of the mother and the unborn baby that should be undertaken in the second stage.”

    Source location

    Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further research to quantify mortality risk for individuals at greater risk is needed from appropriate bodies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are aware that The Birthplace Study found that for multiparous women home births are as safe as hospital births. For first-time mothers, there is a slightly increased risk of adverse outcomes for the baby. Our patient safety leads are not aware if home births, as currently practised in the UK, are any more or less safe for women. This is supported by a meta-analysis published in 2019 Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses - ScienceDirect.”

    Source location

    Response from National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 November 2025

    Open published response
  2. Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Eclipse Morrison · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eclipse Morrison died at Nottingham City Hospital on 21 July 2021, the day after her birth, following perinatal asphyxia and complications associated with gestational diabetes, excessive fetal growth and shoulder dystocia. The principal concerns included failures to follow up missed appointments, consider and discuss appropriate timing and mode of delivery, identify risk factors during labour, and ensure adequate fetal monitoring. Further concerns related to the implementation and quality assurance of Badgernet, escalation procedures for ultrasound concerns, counselling about shoulder dystocia, and interpretation of Montgomery guidance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure appropriate timing and mode of delivery in high-risk pregnancies

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Risk analysis / mode and timing of birth A significant factor was the failure to consider an elective Caesarean Section (CS). It is not clear why on this history and consideration of mode of delivery did not include a consideration of an elective CS at any stage, by any of the doctors involved. Evidence was given that existing policies in place at GEH were not followed and the reason for this failure has not been identified. Whilst Badgernet could be a useful tool, the evidence suggested that it is being regarded as a first line of defence rather than a failsafe. I am told that the Badgernet maternity system implemented in October 2021 will resolve the problems relating to mode and timing of birth, in that the system will require a consultant to approve a decision for CS/induction of labour (IOL) and that IOL’s will not be approved by the labour coordinator unless the paper booking has been approved on paper. However, on the evidence received it is not clear how this will assist if the risk factors and the need to consider IOL/elective CS have not been identified, by junior staff, thus triggering the need for escalation to/approval by a consultant. I am not clear what has been done to ensure that junior doctors and locums have sufficient technical knowledge to ensure that they are able to identify serious risk factors and alert the consultant to these, so that the consultant may consider the appropriate mode of delivery. No information was provided as to the availability of regular face to face training for all grades concerning high-risk pregnancies not just for career trainees and foundation doctors. I am told that a memo was sent to all junior doctors reminding them that any plan for either IOL or elective CS must be approved by a consultant and that an induction pack containing that information is provided to new starters and locums. I have seen the Women’s and Children Clinical Education Guideline introduced in November 2022. I am told that the information was placed in a prominent position on notice boards, staff rooms and in blogs. It is not clear how the assimilation of this knowledge is tested. It was suggested that this may be in appraisal, but this seems only likely to identify problems after they arise. In any event it seems these methods of dissemination of information and the appraisal system were in place at the time of Eclipse’s birth but did not ensure that the doctors involved in her mother’s care appreciated the impact of the risk factors in this pregnancy. It was not explained how Badgernet or any policy or procedure in place, would ensure that there is a holistic review (including ultrasound scan findings) when planning for timing and mode of birth. The concern remains that there will be further failure to ensure that appropriate timing and mode of delivery will be provided in high-risk pregnancies. ”

    Source location

    Eclipse Morrison · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure holistic review of relevant findings when planning timing and mode of birth

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Risk analysis / mode and timing of birth A significant factor was the failure to consider an elective Caesarean Section (CS). It is not clear why on this history and consideration of mode of delivery did not include a consideration of an elective CS at any stage, by any of the doctors involved. Evidence was given that existing policies in place at GEH were not followed and the reason for this failure has not been identified. Whilst Badgernet could be a useful tool, the evidence suggested that it is being regarded as a first line of defence rather than a failsafe. I am told that the Badgernet maternity system implemented in October 2021 will resolve the problems relating to mode and timing of birth, in that the system will require a consultant to approve a decision for CS/induction of labour (IOL) and that IOL’s will not be approved by the labour coordinator unless the paper booking has been approved on paper. However, on the evidence received it is not clear how this will assist if the risk factors and the need to consider IOL/elective CS have not been identified, by junior staff, thus triggering the need for escalation to/approval by a consultant. I am not clear what has been done to ensure that junior doctors and locums have sufficient technical knowledge to ensure that they are able to identify serious risk factors and alert the consultant to these, so that the consultant may consider the appropriate mode of delivery. No information was provided as to the availability of regular face to face training for all grades concerning high-risk pregnancies not just for career trainees and foundation doctors. I am told that a memo was sent to all junior doctors reminding them that any plan for either IOL or elective CS must be approved by a consultant and that an induction pack containing that information is provided to new starters and locums. I have seen the Women’s and Children Clinical Education Guideline introduced in November 2022. I am told that the information was placed in a prominent position on notice boards, staff rooms and in blogs. It is not clear how the assimilation of this knowledge is tested. It was suggested that this may be in appraisal, but this seems only likely to identify problems after they arise. In any event it seems these methods of dissemination of information and the appraisal system were in place at the time of Eclipse’s birth but did not ensure that the doctors involved in her mother’s care appreciated the impact of the risk factors in this pregnancy. It was not explained how Badgernet or any policy or procedure in place, would ensure that there is a holistic review (including ultrasound scan findings) when planning for timing and mode of birth. The concern remains that there will be further failure to ensure that appropriate timing and mode of delivery will be provided in high-risk pregnancies. ”

    Source location

    Eclipse Morrison · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Sinon MASHA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sinon Masha was born at home on 17 December 2021 following a breech presentation that was not identified until labour. After a 27-minute delay before delivery of his head, he suffered a catastrophic hypoxic brain injury and died on 21 December 2021. The principal concern was that the Trust’s process for managing home births against medical advice was not operating as set out in its guidance, was fragmented, and might result in insufficiently informed birth choices that put lives at risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to involve patients’ named obstetric consultants in multiprofessional appointments

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Specifically, Section 5 of the Birth Choices Guidance include: “5.1 All women requesting birth outside of guidance must be referred for discussion to the consultant midwife via BadgerNet for decision-making regarding their birth choices. ... 5.7. Where there are complexities that require the input of other professionals and if the woman remains undecided or voices a decisive choice to pursue a plan outside of Trust guidance a joint multiprofessional appointment must be arranged. 5.8. This appointment should include the consultant midwife; the woman’s named obstetric consultant and other relevant professionals/clinicians as needed. The consultant midwife will convene the multiprofessional team meeting with the purpose of ensuring that a comprehensive multiprofessional pregnancy and birth plan is formulated. 5.9. There may be occasions when the multiprofessional team cannot meet. In these circumstances it is acceptable for the multiprofessional team to see the woman separately. However, the team members must still agree a plan together and document this on the woman’s records.” 3. Evidence given at the inquest pertaining to the current situation was that the system outlined in section 5.8 of the Birth Choices Guidance is not in operation at all. Evidence was given by UHB’s Community Matron that without the input of a Consultant Obstetrician at the multiprofessional appointment, things might be missed in the birth plan, and the information given by the Consultant Midwife and Community Midwives may not carry the same weight with the patient as hearing the opinion of the Consultant Obstetrician. It was stated in evidence by the Community Matron that this could put the lives of Mums and babies at risk. 4. Evidence was given by the Director of Midwifery that although patient’s named Consultants are not involved in multiprofessional appointments with the patient there is a bi-weekly meeting of the other professionals who discuss all high risk patients and then the Consultant midwife meets with the patient’s named Consultant (who will have reviewed the patient in clinic) and discusses the individual cases and the birth plans. This system is felt to be working satisfactorily by the Consultant midwife. 5. I remain concerned that the current approach has evolved from necessity rather than being a carefully considered and planned amendment to the Trust’s guidance. Furthermore, the approach appears fragmented increasing the risk of mis-communication or mis-understanding. This system also deprives the patient of the benefit of hearing the perspectives of all the relevant professionals together in a setting where they, the patient, can witness the discussion and be satisfied that everyone has considered all the relevant factors and answered any queries or concerns they may have relevant to their decision. Consequently, I am concerned that patients may not be making fully informed decisions resulting in birth choices that put lives at risk. ”

    Source location

    Sinon MASHA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold biweekly multidisciplinary meetings for joint discussion and planning with the named consultant.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A Bi-weekly MDT meeting is in place with joint discussion and planning separately with the named consultant.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit multidisciplinary input for high-risk home births to evidence consultant involvement in birth plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• To ensure compliance with the standards an audit is in place to evidence multidisciplinary input for high-risk home births. The initial audit has demonstrated that for those women who had requested birth outside of guidance, there was always consultant input into their birth plan.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Allocate a consultant to regular multidisciplinary meetings following completion of consultant job planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is a plan to agree allocated Consultant (either Delivery suite lead or Antenatal clinic lead) to regular MDT meetings. This is contingent on the current consultant job planning (due for completion by 31 August 2023). Following job planning this action will be completed before the 31 October 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and align the Birth Choices and home birth guidelines to clarify referral pathways, team responsibilities, and inclusion in birth-planning discussions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A review of the Birth Choices Guidelines (CG1200) and the home birth guidance (CG1143) is being undertaken and will be completed by 31 October 2023. Currently there are discrepancies in relation to the referral pathway, roles and responsibilities of members of the multi-professional team (including Consultant Midwife), and inclusion of the woman in birth planning discussions. Alignment of these guidelines will provide a clear and standardised pathway for referral and management for women/birthing people requesting birth outside of guidance including homebirth, and clarity of Roles and responsibilities of each member for the Multi professional team.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 July 2023

    Open published response
  4. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Jessica Hodgkinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jessica Hodgkinson died on 14 May 2021 at Chesterfield Royal Hospital shortly after giving birth, following a pulmonary embolism arising from a deep vein thrombosis and acute anaphylaxis of unknown cause. The inquest identified failures to communicate and follow up the plan for prophylactic tinzaparin until birth, and concerns about consideration and documentation of her Klippel-Trenaunay Syndrome during pregnancy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess and document the potential impact of KTS on pregnancy

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) I heard in evidence that some staff were unaware of KTS and its potential implications for pregnancy. This was understandable. However, I did not see evidence of any consultant having properly considered and then documented in Jess’ notes the potential impact that KTS might have had on Jess’ pregnancy. ”

    Source location

    Jessica Hodgkinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    RHIAN EMMA KATE ROSE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rhian Rose became unwell during a hospital admission for the second phase of medical termination of pregnancy following feticide for trisomy 21. Her condition deteriorated, leading to emergency caesarean section, hysterectomy and cardiac arrest; she died from multi-organ failure and sepsis on 25 November 2019. The principal concerns were insufficient consideration of informed consent and maternal choice regarding mode of delivery, and inadequate guidance on infection risks and delivery options following feticide.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to give due weight to infection risk from retained foetus in delivery discussions following feticide

    Wider context from the report

    “2) Infection risk of retained foetus following feticide – I am concerned that a significant infection risk (retention of a deceased foetus) is not being given due weight in clinical discussions when a mother is attending for delivery (following feticide). There does not appear to be any specific or detailed local, or indeed national, guidance, for obstetricians and midwives which addresses this issue or discusses important considerations such as whether infection can be controlled by antibiotics alone or whether swifter methods of foetal delivery, such as a caesarean section, should be considered, or indeed whether specific microbiology advice needs to be obtained as part of a multi-disciplinary team approach. Cases such as Rhian’s may well be rare, however consideration could be given as to whether more detailed and specific guidance should be made available to assist clinicians when treating mothers in maternity units following feticide. ”

    Source location

    RHIAN EMMA KATE ROSE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review fetal-loss guidance to reflect updated induction guidance and the additional infection risk following feticide.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Induction of Labour guidance has recently been updated by NICE NG207 published 4th November 2021. In response to this WHAT are reviewing the fetal loss local guidance to reflect these changes and to highlight the additional risk of infection when feticide has been performed prior to delivery.”

    Source location

    2021-0371-Response-from-Worcestershire-Acute-Hospitals-Trust_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 4 November 2021

    Open published response
  6. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    ARCHIE RAY GRIEVES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Archie Ray Grieves was born on 24 May 2017 following a complicated delivery involving shoulder dystocia. He initially showed no signs of life, later showed signs of life, and died a short time after being taken to the special care baby unit. The report identified an avoidable neonatal death, with an eight-minute delay in delivering his body after his head and missed opportunities during antenatal care and delivery to identify risks and plan a safe birth.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prepare a risk-based birth plan with appropriate environment and skilled staff for macrosomic babies

    Wider context from the report

    “14.No risk assessment was made preparatory to the delivery of a macroscop ic baby and the heightened risk of shoulder dystocia 15.No plan was prepared guiding or assistance sought to facilitate a safe birth in a safe environment and with the appropriate level of skilled staff on hand or available ”

    Source location

    ARCHIE RAY GRIEVES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to plan and counsel on timing and mode of delivery for suspected larger babies

    Wider context from the report

    “8. No additional planning for pre delivery/delivery was engaged and this mother was continued on a normal pathway towards delivery apparently planned between the 40th and 42nd week. 9. In the absence of Obstetric care effective planning opportunities were missed to consult and counsel this mother on the mode and time of delivery. In particular no consideration was given to the possibility of an induced or caesarean birth or delivery of this child at the 37th/38th week avoiding increases in baby’s weight and recognisable risks at the time of delivery of a larger baby. ”

    Source location

    ARCHIE RAY GRIEVES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess maternal and fetal risk before selecting a Birthing Pool delivery

    Wider context from the report

    “11.Specifically during the period from 1.30 pm to 6.30 pm, in the absence of any meaningful interrogation of her records the assessment of the mother on presentation in the delivery suite failed to identify any risk she presented in view of her personal bodymass or the size of her baby. It was determined it was appropriate that she deliver in the Birthing Pool. The only considerations as to Pool use were practical considerations around availability, staffing and an adjacent delivery room. 12.As a consequence of the lack of any alert to the risks that this lady presented no consideration was given to the potential risks identified within the Trusts own protocols relevant in the case of this lady and her child. 13.An opportunity was missed to guide the mother away from a pool birth because of those risks and to an alternative method of delivery with appropriate levels of analgesic support commensurate with her needs and anxiety ”

    Source location

    ARCHIE RAY GRIEVES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Aniyah Jasmine Winston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Aniyah Jasmine Winston was delivered vaginally in an undetected breech presentation and was in poor condition at birth after manipulation during delivery. Resuscitation was commenced and ceased at 10:59am. The concerns included the challenges of undetected breech births and the administration of Syntocinon without further review, examination, counselling or a written prescription; professionals involved reportedly felt unable to challenge the decision.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of routine pre-delivery scanning for breech presentation

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The inquest heard that Aniyah was an undetected breech birth. By the time it was identified she was breech her mother was fully dilated. The inquest heard that there are undetected breech births are not uncommon and present particular challenges for those involved in care during labour. The inquest was told that it is the case that pre delivery scans are not routinely carried out to try and reduce the number of undetected breeches and midwives/doctors rely on external examination. The inquest was told that this is due to availability of scanning facilities and training to utilise the scanners. ”

    Source location

    Aniyah Jasmine Winston · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine third-trimester scans are not recommended because no evidence supports them; lack of equipment or training is not the reason they are absent.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the first matter of concern, I can confirm that it is not the case that a lack of equipment or training accounts for a lack of pre-delivery scans to detect fetal malpresentation. Rather, it is that there is currently no evidence base to recommend routine third trimester scanning.”

    Source location

    2018-0241-Response-by-Department-of-Halth-Social-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 September 2018

    Open published response
  8. Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

    AI-generated summary

    Rafe Robbie Angelo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rafe Robbie Angelo was born at 17:30 on 23 September 2014 after his mother was transferred from the Blake Birthing Centre to hospital during labour. He was born pale and floppy, without breathing or a heart rate, and died after 37 minutes of resuscitation. The principal concerns included delays in recognising the need for urgent delivery and communication failures between the birthing centre, ambulance service and hospital, including failure to request a time-critical transfer and a non-urgent ambulance stop.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of antenatal growth-risk assessment to include maternal BMI and emerging risk factors

    Wider context from the report

    “The risk assessment of Ms Angelo followed NICE guidelines at the time but I remain concerned that no simple weigh check is done to check maternal BMI and that GROW charts only pick up 50-55% of cases where growth restriction occurs. A more holistic view is needed of risk factors especially in last few weeks from 34 weeks onwards as this is when the major growth spurt takes place and monitoring closely when additional factors surface is advisable e.g. as in this case cannabis and anti-depressant use were disclosed during this crucial period. ”

    Source location

    Rafe Robbie Angelo · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Kristian Andrew Jaworski · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kristian Andrew Jaworski was born following a prolonged instrumental delivery involving ventouse and forceps, followed by an emergency caesarean section. He was born with poor Apgar scores and died five days later; the report identified a concern that vaginal delivery was presumed partly on the basis of cost.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to rebut a cost-based presumption in favour of vaginal delivery

    Wider context from the report

    “That there was a presumption in favour of vaginal delivery based partly of cost that needed to be rebutted. ”

    Source location

    Kristian Andrew Jaworski · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Department cannot comment on why caesarean delivery was not attempted earlier or whether cost influenced that decision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am unable to comment on why a caesarean delivery was not attempted at an earlier opportunity in this case or whether that decision was based in any way on cost – this is clearly something that the North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust needs to consider. I will ensure that a copy of your letter and this reply are sent to the Trust to give them the opportunity to respond to your concern.”

    Source location

    2016-0125-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 April 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The hospital trust must consider why caesarean delivery was not attempted earlier and whether cost influenced that decision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am unable to comment on why a caesarean delivery was not attempted at an earlier opportunity in this case or whether that decision was based in any way on cost – this is clearly something that the North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust needs to consider. I will ensure that a copy of your letter and this reply are sent to the Trust to give them the opportunity to respond to your concern.”

    Source location

    2016-0125-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 April 2016

    Open published response
  10. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Isla Peyton LORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Isla Peyton LORD was born at Harlow Hospital on 4 November 2012 and suffered an immediate post-natal collapse after delivery, resulting in a hypoxic brain injury. She was transferred to Luton and Dunstable Hospital, where treatment was withdrawn following discussions with her parents, and she died on 8 November 2012. The principal concern was the lack of liaison between the hospitals about the delivery plan after possible heart anomalies were identified.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to coordinate an agreed delivery plan between tertiary and local hospitals

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the course of the evidence it became apparent that once the possibility of heart anomalies was identified at University College Hospital in London (UCLH), there was no liaison between Princess Alexandra Hospital in Harlow and UCLH as to the plan for the delivery of the baby. It was simply agreed that UCLH were content for her to be delivered at the local hospital with a referral being made to Great Ormond Street Hospital after delivery. In order to prevent deaths in the future there needs to be a review of the system that exists between the tertiary hospitals and Princess Alexandra Hospital as to how to formulate an Agreed Delivery Plan for both mother and baby. ”

    Source location

    Isla Peyton LORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the obstetric ultrasound policy to require consultants to obtain and clearly document agreed delivery and neonatal care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The Standard Operating Policy for obstetric ultrasound scanning has been amended to include that consultants in charge of patients referred for second opinion in tertiary centres should request a detailed plan for delivery of the mother and care of the baby. The policy also requests the consultants to document the plan clearly in the patient’s hand held notes and hospital notes.”

    Source location

    I-lord-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 February 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the amended policy by adding it to the Trust guidelines folder and notifying obstetric doctors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The new policy has been added to the Trust guidelines folder accessible by all clinicians.”

    Source location

    I-lord-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 February 2016

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026