Recurring concern

Unsafe disposal of medication

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 24 Mar 2020•Latest report 24 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to collecting, segregating, documenting, returning or disposing of unwanted, unused, incorrectly dispensed or otherwise unsuitable medication, including clear procedures and staff understanding of the correct disposal route.

Not included

  • Excludes ordinary medication prescribing, dispensing, administration, reconciliation or monitoring failures where disposal is not the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes generic clinical-waste disposal failures unless the assertion specifically concerns medication disposal or the medication-disposal route.
  • Excludes general policy, training or documentation deficiencies that are not directly tied to safe medication collection or disposal.
  • Excludes medication access, storage or security failures where no collection or disposal control is deficient.
Reports
6

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
6

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2020–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
15

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care4
Burton Croft Surgery1
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust1
Guys Marsh Prison1
HM Prison and Probation Service1
Ministry of Justice1
NHS England1
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Naeem Ahmed · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Naeem Ahmed, a Consultant Anaesthetist, was found dead in a hospital rest room on 21 June 2025 after using alcohol and a substance that is redacted in the report. The concerns included access to potentially fatal medicines from sharps bins and fragmented systems for managing doctors’ working patterns, secondary employment and cumulative workload across providers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to safely dispose of small volumes of medicines in sharps bins

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence at the Inquest revealed that at the time of Naeem’s death a process in place at Poole Hospital that if there were small volumes of medicines to be disposed of by representatives of the Trust which were less than 50ml in volume, such as after surgery had taken place, these would be squirted into the sharps bins and then the needles would also be disposed of in the sharps bin too. This was identified in the independent review which concluded that this practice posed a risk that fatal medicines could be accessed from the sharps bin. As a result, UHD now use gels in the sharps bins which immediately denature and destroy the liquids squirted into the sharps bins. I am concerned that what was happening at the time of Naeem’s death continues to happen at other Trusts across England and Wales and could lead to future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Naeem Ahmed · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Address controlled-drug disposal at the national learning event and remind designated bodies of their secure-disposal obligations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The National Controlled Drugs Accountable Officer (CDAO) function will address this matter again at an upcoming national learning event on 22nd September 2026. We will remind designated bodies of their obligations under both the misuse of drugs and health and safety legislation which require that controlled drugs are securely disposed of and not ordinarily capable of being accessed accidentally or deliberately.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise controlled-drug disposal with the Care Quality Commission for inclusion in medicines-governance inspections.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England will also raise this case with the Care Quality Commission as the medicines governance component of their inspection will include the disposal of controlled drugs in operating departments.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to South West controlled-drugs accountable officers about learning on medicine disposal.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England’s South West regional colleagues have been in contact with the South West CDAO who has informed us that the following actions have been taken:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise the disposal issue through the national controlled-drugs accountable-officer network and share the learning with regional NHS England colleagues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England’s South West regional colleagues have been in contact with the South West CDAO who has informed us that the following actions have been taken:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medicine disposal matters are operational issues outside the Department’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care made enquiries with NHS England and concluded that the concerns you have raised are more appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. The matters relating to the disposal of medicines are operational issues that fall within NHS England's remit. This includes responsibility for coordinating the regional response. Accordingly, NHS England is best placed to respond to these aspects of your correspondence. I am advised that NHS England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response to the operational concerns you have raised.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England is responsible for addressing the operational concerns, including coordinating the regional response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In considering your report, officials within the Department of Health and Social Care made enquiries with NHS England and concluded that the concerns you have raised are more appropriately addressed by NHS England directly. The matters relating to the disposal of medicines are operational issues that fall within NHS England's remit. This includes responsibility for coordinating the regional response. Accordingly, NHS England is best placed to respond to these aspects of your correspondence. I am advised that NHS England will therefore provide you with a full and comprehensive response to the operational concerns you have raised.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response
  2. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Valerie Jane Gibson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Valerie Jane Gibson died on 29 October 2023 at Monkwearmouth Hospital after being admitted under the Mental Health Act with psychotic symptoms and assessed as being at risk of self-harm and harm to others. The principal concerns were uncertainty and inconsistency in the checking of possessions, dispensing and administration of medication, supervision of nurses, and use of the Omnicell and electronic medication record systems, resulting in unclear records of what medication had been dispensed or administered.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a consistently understood procedure for disposing of incorrectly dispensed liquid medication

    Wider context from the report

    “Each nurse had a different understanding as to what the correct procedure was to dispose of liquid medication incorrectly dispensed. One thought it went straight into the blue disposal bin but the other did not think that was the case. The group medical director also had a slightly different view that a liquid could be disposed of in the blue disposal bin if it was in a sealed container. This added to the confusion over which medication had been administered to Valerie. ”

    Source location

    Valerie Jane Gibson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise nursing medicines competency assessment requirements covering EPMA, Omnicell, formulations, liquid disposal, supervision scenarios and medicines-administration sequencing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “- Nursing staff medicines competencies have been reviewed and updated to include use of EPMA and Omnicell.”

    Source location

    Response from Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response
  3. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Sheldon Lawrence Jeans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 13 November 2022, Sheldon Lawrence Jeans, a serving prisoner at HMP Guys Marsh, was found collapsed and unresponsive in his cell. The inquest recorded that he died following an idiosyncratic response to alcoholic intoxication and medicinal drugs, combined with partial postural asphyxia. The report raised concerns about the lack of guidance on illicitly brewed alcohol and the governance, storage and return of medication held by prisoners.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure return of excess medication after prescription discontinuation

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Prisoners can have access to certain medication to hold in their possession which could be accessed by other prisoners and there is a lack of national policy, and local policy at HMP Guys Marsh, from a healthcare and prison perspective, around the governance of medication held in possession in the prisoner estate. Evidence was heard that when a person is prescribed medication in prison, it can either be taken under supervision, or a prisoner can be provided with the medication to hold in their possession, in their cell. In these cases, the prisoner is responsible for the safety of that medication. Prior to being provided with medication in their possession a risk assessment is undertaken upon the prisoner to assess the risks associated with the drug and also the risks associated with prisoner. Whilst medications defined as controlled drugs would not be given in possession, it is possible to have medication that could cause death in possession. Although Sheldon was not prescribed the medications that caused his death, evidence was given some of those medications are suitable to be prescribed to a prisoner in possession. It is not know how Sheldon accessed the medication found in his system at the time of his death, other than to say he obtained it at HMP Guys Marsh. At HMP Guys Marsh, which may not be the case across the prisoner estate, a lockable cupboard is provided in cells for the storage of medication. Evidence was given that at times cells will be left insecure at HMP Guys Marsh when the prison is in a state of unlock, such as when prisoners collect meals or for example when they go for showers or are out of the cells on association. Evidence was given that prisoners go into each other's cells when they are in a state of unlock. Prisoners could therefore enter another prisoner's cell. If medication is not held securely in a lockable cupboard there is a risk that prisoners who are not prescribed medication, could access medication. Evidence was given at the Inquest that due to the chaotic life some prisoners lead, even when provided with lockable cupboards, cells at HMP Guys Marsh have been seen to contain medication that is not secure and is strewn all over the cell. The medication in Sheldon’s cell at the time of his death was found insecure in a Tupperware container. Further, if a medication prescribed to a prisoner is discontinued, evidence was heard that the onus is upon the prisoner returning any excess medication to the healthcare department at HMP Guys Marsh which may be the position in other prisons. The issues around securing of medication held in possession in a cell and the onus being upon prisoners to return unused medication, carries a risk of prisoners accessing unprescribed medication. At the time of Sheldon’s death he was not prescribed the medications found in his system and he had in his cell excessive amounts of medication he was prescribed and had previously been prescribed and discontinued. I am therefore concerned the lack of guidance and policy nationally, and locally at HMP Guys Marsh, on storage of in possession medication and what to do when a medication is discontinued to ensure prisoners do not continue to possess left over medication, could lead to future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Sheldon Lawrence Jeans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and distribute prison health-promotion materials on safe medication storage and disposal of unused or discontinued medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To further support safe medication practices, we will be developing and distributing new health promotion materials to the prison population at HMP Guys Marsh, but also within the wider Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust prison portfolio. These materials will focus on:”

    Source location

    Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England and Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust are responsible for prisoners’ medication management, prescribing and decisions about medication held in possession.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The handling of medication held in possession (IP) by prisoners and prescribing practices in prisons are the responsibility of NHS England. Here at HMP Guys Marsh, our commissioned partner is Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for prisoners’ in-possession medication and prescribing lies with NHS England under clinical assurance and national service specifications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The handling of medication held in possession (IP) by prisoners and prescribing practices in prisons are the responsibility of NHS England. The safe management of medication is governed by clinical assurance and national service specifications, which set out standards for prescribing, dispensing, and monitoring medication.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Services
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing risk assessments, compliance checks and medication procedures provide robust safeguards for in-possession medication governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The practice of allowing prisoners to hold certain medications in-possession is designed to promote personal responsibility and mirror community standards. This approach supports individuals in preparing for release and reintegration with the community and aligns with the principle of equivalence of care. It is also in line with a variety of nationally applicable guidance. https://www.rpharms.com/recognition/setting-professional-standards/optimising-medicines-in-secure-environments.”

    Source location

    Response from Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing local procedures, national standards, contractual monitoring, inspections and regional governance provide sufficient assurance for medicines safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Procedures and governance around the management of prescription medicines will vary between different prison categories and local risks and incidents. Various processes are used to inform medicines use and safety in each prison including security and clinical incident management and review; in-cell searches and clinical therapeutic or substance misuse testing. National guidance could further complicate what is already a complex issue for both prisoners and prison staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2025

    Open published response
  4. West Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Aoife Rose McAdam · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Aoife Rose McAdam died in Leeds General Infirmary on 4 September 2021 after taking a significant overdose of propranolol. She had sought help shortly after taking the overdose, but two opportunities to send an ambulance sooner were missed. The report’s concerns included her being left with a significant quantity of propranolol after she said she no longer wanted or needed it, and delays in providing help after the overdose.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to advise safe disposal of unwanted propranolol tablets

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) On 12th August 2021, in a consultation with another GP at Burton Croft Surgery, Aoife reported that the Propranolol was not helping her and, following discussions and advice, she said she wished to switch to the antidepressant Sertraline, which was prescribed. (4) In evidence, the GP present at the second consultation agreed that Aoife should have been advised safely to dispose of any propranolol tablets remaining from the earlier prescription by, for example, returning them to a pharmacist. Aoife was not so advised. (5) Aoife, who by reason of her being prescribed an antidepressant was known to be in a potentially fragile mental state, was left in possession of a significant quantity of a medication known for its potential cardiotoxicity when taken in overdose and which she had stated she no longer wanted or needed. (6) The primary cause of her death was an overdose of that potentially cardiotoxic medication, which she should not have had in her possession by 4th September 2021. ”

    Source location

    Aoife Rose McAdam · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a significant-event review of propranolol prescribing, circulate its learning, and escalate the outcomes to the CCG.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A Significant Event Meeting/internal review was held at the Practice on 17 November 2021. This meeting was attended by partners, nurses, managers and GP trainees. Minutes of this meeting were subsequently circulated to the whole Practice team.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and distribute the locum pack with prescribing and unwanted-medication-return guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. ████████ have been working on an update to the locum pack. The updated pack is now in use at the Practice and includes a section on returning unwanted medications. It has also been distributed to all GPs/GP Registrars and locums. We enclose a copy of the relevant section of the updated Locum Pack at Appendix 5.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the repeat prescribing policy to require checking for unused medication and advising safe pharmacy disposal.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The Practice Repeat Prescribing Policy, enclosed as Appendix 1, was updated on 9 May 2023, and at page 10, you will note a section, under the heading "Review Process" which states as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed safe-medication-storage and disposal advice through EMIS coding, clinician reminders, and direct patient-record documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the meantime, the Practice is using the sno med code 2974640010 ‘education about safe storage and management of medication’ and the Practice is using it specifically in patients with mental health problems when they are prescribed propranolol and antidepressants. The use of this code will allow the audit to take place in February 2024 as set out below.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish website guidance asking patients to return unwanted or out-of-date medication to pharmacies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. The Practice website was updated on 2 May 2023. Under the "Order a prescription section", the Practice has created a new heading in red type "Returning unwanted or out of date medication". This section then states as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact local pharmacies to promote return of unused medication and request supporting awareness materials.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. The Practice has contacted 19 local pharmacies by email, asking them to raise awareness of the importance of returning unused medication to a pharmacy amongst their patients. The Practice also asked the pharmacies if they could share any posters or on-line material regarding the return of medicines with the surgery.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and refine a patient text about medication reviews and returning unused medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The Practice is currently working on a text to be sent to all patients in relation to the completion of a medication review questionnaire and the Practice has added a new section at the bottom of this text in relation to returning unused medication.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display laminated reception and waiting-room posters asking patients to return unused medication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The Practice intends to put posters up in reception and in the waiting room asking patients to ensure that unused medication is returned.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit use of the safe-medication EMIS code and discuss the findings at a monthly significant-event meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the meantime, the Practice is using the sno med code 2974640010 ‘education about safe storage and management of medication’ and the Practice is using it specifically in patients with mental health problems when they are prescribed propranolol and antidepressants. The use of this code will allow the audit to take place in February 2024 as set out below.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Practice cannot amend Ardens depression templates locally because the template system is controlled nationally.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. Burton Croft Surgery have tried to amend the depression template used at the Practice to add in a warning about the safe storage, management and disposal of anti-depressant and beta blocker medication. It is technically not possible to amend the Ardens templates at local practice level.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ardens is responsible for considering and implementing the requested change to the national depression template.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “By way of explanation, a company called Ardens create and distribute templates for use nationally in GP Practices. On 26 April 2023, the Practice sent an email to Ardens asking them to include an additional tick box on the depression template with the suggested wording, "patient advised of safe storage, management and disposal of anti-depressant medication". The Practice had hoped that this tick box would be added to national templates used by GPs.”

    Source location

    Response from Burton Croft Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2023

    Open published response
  5. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Neville Bardoliwalla · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Neville Bardoliwalla was found at home on 10 March 2020 after hanging himself from two screws in a door frame. Evidence was heard that he had accumulated prescribed controlled medication and that there was no process for collecting and disposing of it.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a process for collecting and disposing of prescribed controlled medication

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence was heard regarding the fact that prescribed controlled medication had been accumulated by Mr Bardoliwalla and that there was no process for collecting and disposing of this medication. ”

    Source location

    Neville Bardoliwalla · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Simon Anthony Delahunty · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Simon Anthony Delahunty took an overdose of medication prescribed for another patient, which had been left at an address as part of end-of-life care. The principal concern was that there were no arrangements or guidance for collecting or disposing of unused end-of-life prescription medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of arrangements or guidance for the collection or disposal of unused end-of-life prescription medication

    Wider context from the report

    “There are no arrangements or guidance concerning the collection or disposal of unused end of life prescription medication. ”

    Source location

    Simon Anthony Delahunty · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing pharmacy return, secure storage, collection, and disposal arrangements provide a safe method for disposing of unwanted medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Disposal of unwanted medicines is an essential service of the NHS Community Pharmacy Contractual Framework¹, to be provided by all community pharmacies in England. This requires them to accept unwanted medicines from private households, residential care homes and children’s homes. These returned medicines are then stored securely and safely by pharmacies until they are collected for safe disposal.”

    Source location

    2020-0077-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care_Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 April 2020

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026