Recurring concern

Inadequate management of patients' nutrition and hydration needs

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 2 Jul 2014•Latest report 24 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to assessing, monitoring, recording, providing or reviewing patients' food and fluid intake and nutritional or hydration needs, including risk assessments, nutrition or fluid charts, prompting, prescribed nutritional support and escalation of inadequate intake.

Not included

  • Excludes medication, electrolyte or disease-specific treatment concerns unless the asserted deficiency directly concerns nutrition or hydration needs.
  • Excludes generic clinical record-keeping, staffing or care-planning deficiencies unless they directly impair the nutrition and hydration process.
  • Excludes food-service or dietary provision failures where no patient-specific nutrition or hydration safety need is identified.
  • Excludes malnutrition-only concerns that do not materially involve the broader nutrition and hydration management process.
  • Excludes isolated fluid-balance recording failures where the concern is limited to fluid records and does not support the wider nutrition and hydration condition.
Reports
39

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
44

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
80

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission5
Department of Health and Social Care3
East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust2
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust2
A & B Healthcare Limited1
Academy of Medical Royal Colleges1
Amberley Hall Care Home1
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Athena Care Homes (UK) Limited1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Cardinal HC Limited1
Care Outlook Ltd1
Care UK1
Care UK Community Partnerships Ltd1
Caring UK Limited1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    John Francis HOWLETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Francis Howlett had severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, was bedbound and required oxygen in a care home, where he became increasingly frail with poor nutrition and fluid intake. He developed an infection, was admitted to hospital, and died on 31 January 2024 after continuing to decline. Concerns included his spending 22 hours in an emergency department corridor and the care home’s inadequate systems for robustly monitoring his nutritional status and fluid intake.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of robust monitoring of care-home residents' nutritional status and fluid intake

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The evidence before the inquest indicated that the care home in question had been of concern in relation to the care offered to residents for some time. It was indicated that action plans were in place particularly in relation to safeguarding concerns given the vulnerability of residents. However despite those steps being in place and the concerns the systems were not in place at the care home to robustly monitor his nutritional status and fluid intake. He became increasingly frail with decreased physiological reserves as a consequence. ”

    Source location

    John Francis HOWLETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement changes to recording and care-monitoring systems for earlier welfare and health escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The new Manager and myself have been busy implementing changes to our in-house recording systems and care monitoring systems to ensure we identify and action any changes in residents’ welfare and health at the earliest opportunity.”

    Source location

    Response from The Lakes Care Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use digital care records and daily hydration tracking to identify, escalate and remedy residents’ fluid-intake concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “c) The New Management Structure is working closely with senior carers about the ability of the Digital Care Record to assist in ensuring Residents Well Being and the Hydration Chart is a good example of this.”

    Source location

    Response from The Lakes Care Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess The Lakes Care Centre against safety, effectiveness and leadership requirements, identifying required improvements and regulatory breaches.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An assessment of The Lakes Care Centre was commenced on 22 April 2024 following concerns in relation to the care and support people were receiving. The key questions of ‘Is the service safe?’, ‘Is the service effective’ and ‘Is the service well led?’ were reviewed and the overall rating for these key questions and the service overall was ‘requires improvement’. At the time of this assessment The Lakes Care Centre had recently stopped operating as a nursing home but was still registered to deliver the regulated activity of ‘Treatment for Disease, Disorder or Injury’. The provider was asked to submit a notification to deregister from this regulated activity at the location and this was completed on 26 September 2024. The Lakes Care Centre continues to be registered for the regulated activity of ‘Accommodation for people requiring nursing or personal care’.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Take enforcement action in response to identified safety, risk-management and governance shortcomings at The Lakes Care Centre.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The coroner noted in this regulation 28 report that despite action plans being in place in relation to safeguarding concerns, systems were not in place at the care home to robustly monitor Mr Howlett’s nutritional status and fluid intake. Our assessment finding indicated there continued to be some areas for improvement shortly after Mr Howlett’s death, but that action was being implemented and embedded at that time. Enforcement action was taken in response to these findings and CQC continue to monitor the service to identify if concerns around the service are escalated and require further action.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 6 · response
    Published 10 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monitoring The Lakes Care Centre to identify whether concerns escalate and require further regulatory action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The coroner noted in this regulation 28 report that despite action plans being in place in relation to safeguarding concerns, systems were not in place at the care home to robustly monitor Mr Howlett’s nutritional status and fluid intake. Our assessment finding indicated there continued to be some areas for improvement shortly after Mr Howlett’s death, but that action was being implemented and embedded at that time. Enforcement action was taken in response to these findings and CQC continue to monitor the service to identify if concerns around the service are escalated and require further action.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 6 · response
    Published 10 September 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No Safeguarding Adults Review was considered necessary because learning was identified for the care home, but not for wider partners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is good practice for a local authority’s Safeguarding Adults Board (SAB) to work with coroners. You may have already contacted the local SAB about whether they have considered Safeguarding Adults Review (SAR). However separately DHSC officials reached out to Tameside SAB.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 September 2024

    Open published response
  2. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Alfred SPARROW · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alfred Sparrow, who lived with vascular dementia, became a resident at The Meadows Nursing Home on 11 September 2023 and died there on 1 December 2023 after fluctuating food and fluid intake, increasing frailty and a significant deterioration. Concerns included staff not always assisting him with food and fluid intake as required by his care plan, a care-note entry recording that he drank tea about two hours after his death, and the failure of the nursing home manager’s investigation to identify that false entry and the related deficiencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide required assistance with food and fluid intake

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Mr. Sparrow had a longstanding diagnosis of vascular dementia, and his care plan stated that he required full assistance and support from staff at mealtimes with regard to his intake of food and fluids, and that he would not support himself if food and drink was placed in front of him. Despite the care plan, entries in Mr. Sparrow’s care notes, while recording his food and fluid intake, made no mention of whether a staff member at The Meadows Nursing Home was assisting him in this regard. Having heard the evidence at the inquest, I was satisfied, and found as a matter of fact, that staff at The Meadows Nursing Home did not always assist Mr. Sparrow with his food and fluid intake; ”

    Source location

    Alfred SPARROW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The resident retained some ability to feed himself, so full mealtime assistance was not always necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The coroner’s first concern revolves around the care provided to Mr Sparrow during mealtimes. His care plan at his previous care home specified that he required full assistance with food and fluid intake due to his diagnosis of vascular dementia. However, care notes documenting his food and fluid intake did not clearly indicate whether he was being assisted, raising concerns that Mr Sparrow might not always have received the assistance required, potentially putting his health at risk.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardinal Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 August 2025

    Open published response
  3. East Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Ann DIVALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Ann DIVALL had Alzheimer's disease and sustained a hip fracture at home on 15 September 2022, which was surgically repaired during a hospital admission. She was discharged on 24 October 2022 for end-of-life care and died at home on 29 October 2022. Concerns included severe oral thrush and malnutrition, limited mobilisation, development and deterioration of a grade 4 sacral pressure sore, and misleading or incomplete discharge documentation and investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in providing nutritional supplementation

    Wider context from the report

    “A. That Mrs Divall developed severe oral thrush making it very difficult for her to eat and drink and take her oral medication. She was referred to the dietitians on 2.10.22 and triaged by an Assistant the following day. She was not prescribed Fortisip until 14.10.22 by which time she was becoming malnourished. The oral thrush continued until discharge. Nystatin appeared to be prescribed once on 12.10.22 and was not prescribed on discharge nor mentioned in the discharge summary. I heard evidence on PFD matters that software which requires a clinician to check oral care is being implemented. I remain of the opinion that this forms part of basic nursing care which was overlooked in Mrs Divall's case. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann DIVALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct regular senior nurse-led audits of compliance with MUST treatment plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have developed regular senior nurse-led audits to measure the quality of compliance with the treatment plan for MUST. Plans are also in place for a Trust wide audit of the quality MUST assessments, including evidence of treatments commenced.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake a Trust-wide audit of MUST assessment quality and treatment evidence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have developed regular senior nurse-led audits to measure the quality of compliance with the treatment plan for MUST. Plans are also in place for a Trust wide audit of the quality MUST assessments, including evidence of treatments commenced.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update Dietetic Assistant competencies and provide training and support on accurate referral coding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Turning to the prescription of Fortisip, this is typically undertaken following a registered dietitian’s assessment. We accept that doctors could have prescribed this prior to review by a dietitian in this case. On this occasion due to a coding error at the point of triage, the urgency of our response is not as it should have been. Dietetic Assistant (DA) competencies have now been updated and additional training and support are given to DAs regarding the importance of coding correctly at this point in the pathway, to minimise the potential for recurrence of this error.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind ward staff to offer suitable nourishing drinks before dietitian review and promote high-calorie, high-protein ward options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the completion of the MUST or mouthcare assessment on admission, the dietitians will have base line information to work from to enable a full assessment of the patient. Any concerns are highlighted to dietitians via the referral process and from communication with the MDT, patient and family. As part of the learning implemented following Mrs Divall’s experience, all ward staff have received escalated communications to remind them that they can offer nourishing drinks such as Complan shakes and thickened yoghurts prior to dietitian referral or review, as long as there are no concerns about swallowing difficulties/dysphagia. The Dietetic team additionally promote the availability of high calorie, high protein options on the wards to staff and patients.”

    Source location

    Response from East Sussex Healthcare
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 May 2024

    Open published response
  4. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Peter Jason FANNING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter Jason FANNING, who had cerebral palsy, severe physical impairment, epilepsy and relied on a gastrostomy feeding tube, experienced repeated tube dislodgements and admissions for replacement. He developed pneumonia and died on 19 December 2023; concerns related to limited availability for complex feeding-tube replacements and maintaining nutrition after dislodgement.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain nutrition after feeding-tube dislodgement

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The inquest heard evidence that Peter’s nutritional status was suboptimal due to repeated tube dislodgments and waiting for radiology or theatre slots to be available. Consideration needs to be given as to how best to maintain patients’ nutrition after tube dislodgments when they rely on feeding tubes. ”

    Source location

    Peter Jason FANNING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    MORGAN-ROSE HART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Morgan-Rose Hart, who was detained on a female mental health ward, died on 12 July 2022 after being found unresponsive with a ligature around her neck. The report identified concerns about missed and falsified observations, failures to complete physical welfare checks after bathroom alerts, inadequate escalation of risk, shortcomings in investigation and record keeping, and insufficient suitable placements for people with autism and mental health and self-harm risks in Essex.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Omissions in required food and fluid chart recording

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Trust oversight of care – the quality of record keeping was acknowledged not to be appropriate by nurses and senior staff during evidence, yet had been signed off: a. Observations sheets for vulnerable detained mental patients were signed off by nurses in charge as being appropriate despite an absence of any recorded therapeutic engagement b. Omissions in the recording of food and fluid charts required by the Responsible Clinician for a patient who was losing weight with a diagnosis of Body Dysmorphic Disorder. c. The Responsible Clinician’s evidence was that the absence of appropriate food and fluid charts for other patients was an ongoing issue on Chelmer Ward that had been raised with nursing staff ”

    Source location

    MORGAN-ROSE HART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide Food and Fluid Refresher training to inpatient nursing staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All inpatient nursing staff are completing the Food and Fluid Refresher training delivered by the Professional Development Team.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 28 December 2023

    Open published response
  6. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Geoffrey Alan WHATLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Geoffrey Alan Whatling entered Amberley Hall Care Home for rehabilitation and later became unwell, with deteriorating NEWS2 scores leading to hospital admission on 10 April 2023. He died on 26 April 2023, with the medical cause of death recorded as infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, with frailty and old age. Concerns included incomplete food and fluid records, failures to call emergency services when required, inadequate observation frequency, and gaps in care-record documentation and follow-up.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incomplete food and fluid charting

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Whatling was not eating and drinking very much. A food and fluid chart was not fully completed. ”

    Source location

    Geoffrey Alan WHATLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient food and fluid intake

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Whatling was not eating and drinking very much. A food and fluid chart was not fully completed. ”

    Source location

    Geoffrey Alan WHATLING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Felice Eileen Grace Banfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Felice Eileen Grace Banfield was admitted with a painful knee and required non-invasive ventilation, but there was a lack of clarity about where and when this could be provided. She was not brought to the attention of respiratory clinicians, deteriorated with mixed respiratory and metabolic acidosis and an acute kidney injury, and died despite treatment. The principal concerns were failures concerning access to non-invasive ventilation, recognition of respiratory risk and deterioration, and provision and monitoring of adequate food, fluids and continuity of care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use food and fluid charts to monitor hydration and calorific intake

    Wider context from the report

    “A failure to recognise a deterioration in the presentation of a patient which could have triggered a request for repeat bloods and revealed the worsening acidosis before an AKI developed. There appear at least two elements to this: i) the use of food and fluid charts to make sure a patient is not becoming dehydrated and is having adequate calorific intake; ii) for patients who stay on AMU longer than usual, ensuring there is some continuity in medical or nursing care, so a deterioration in presentation can be recognised promptly. Would there be value, for example, in requiring a patient who is on AMU for longer than say, 48 hours, to become the responsibility of a single, named consultant who will be responsible for regular review starting at the 48 hour mark? ”

    Source location

    Felice Eileen Grace Banfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cascade a safety briefing to relevant AMU staff on using food and fluid charts for vulnerable patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the local investigation completed by the Trust, AMU cascaded a safety briefing to all relevant staff regarding the appropriate use of fluid and food charts in vulnerable patients, highlighting the learning identified in the investigation.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor Trustwide compliance with MUST scoring and food and hydration charts through AMaT and address hotspots.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Trust wide compliance with MUST scoring, Food and Hydration Charts is monitored monthly on the Audit Management and Tracking (AMaT) system. The AMaT system highlights any hotspots for needing additional support with training and learning that can be supported by the Lead for Quality, Safety and Innovation and Corporate Nursing Team. AMU has not triggered as a hotspot of concern which would suggest the action being taken by the Matron and the sharing of the safety briefing has been effective.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a band 6 AMU link nurse role for nutrition and hydration quality improvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “AMU have also implemented a band 6 link nurse for nutrition and hydration on the ward. This individual liaises with the dietitians and therapists as part of quality improvement. There is a study session on the ward booked for the 4th of June 2023 where nutrition and hydration will be covered.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver the scheduled AMU study session covering nutrition and hydration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “AMU have also implemented a band 6 link nurse for nutrition and hydration on the ward. This individual liaises with the dietitians and therapists as part of quality improvement. There is a study session on the ward booked for the 4th of June 2023 where nutrition and hydration will be covered.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 January 2023

    Open published response
  8. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Sophia Ayuk · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sophia Ayuk, who had treatment-resistant schizophrenia and was an inpatient, became motionless and unresponsive on 18 March 2022, later deteriorated and died despite resuscitation. The inquest narrative attributed her death to a pulmonary embolism following a deep vein thrombosis, and recorded that she had not taken food or drink for at least two days. The principal concerns were that VTE risk was not assessed during either period of inpatient care and that food and fluid intake monitoring was not adequately followed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to adequately monitor and record patients’ food and fluid intake

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Instructions given to monitor and record Ms Ayuk’s food and fluid intake were not adequately followed. ”

    Source location

    Sophia Ayuk · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a nutrition policy emphasizing food and fluid monitoring for in-patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1) The Trust implemented a new nutrition policy that highlights the importance of food and fluid monitoring for in-patients;”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include food and fluid charts in the monthly physical health training programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3) The Trust introduced a series of training measures in relation to nutrition on in-patient wards:”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 25 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct daily senior-nurse checks of food and fluid charts for completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since you expressed your concerns in the Regulation 28 report, NCFMH has undertaken the following additional steps to address the issue of staff compliance with food and fluid chart completion:”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 25 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct weekly matron night checks including review of food and fluid charts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2) Matrons now do weekly night checks that include review of food/fluid charts.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 25 January 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a new decision-making template for commencing or terminating food and fluid chart monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3) A new template for decision making for commencing/terminating food and fluid chart monitoring has been developed and is in use.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 25 January 2023

    Open published response
  9. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Janice HOPPER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janice HOPPER was discharged from hospital to a care home on 31 December 2021, became unwell in January 2022, was admitted to hospital, and died on 12 February 2022. Concerns included inaccurate and inadequately reviewed care plans, failures to monitor blood glucose, food and fluid intake, and the administration of Morphine Sulphate as a matter of course despite instructions that it was to be given only as required. The inquest recorded the medical cause of death as Alzheimer's Dementia, Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, with a conclusion of natural causes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate recording of food intake

    Wider context from the report

    “9. There were concerns about Mrs Hopper's food intake. It is not clear from the evidence that the amount stated in the records as being consumed was accurate. For instance, on several occasions she was noted to have consumed large amounts of fluid in one go and to have eaten more than one meal within a short space of time. ”

    Source location

    Janice HOPPER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a hydration-monitoring system using first-four-week fluid charts, shift-based hydration trolleys, millilitre recording and daily senior review of charts and electronic records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All residents’ care plans are developed with the individual, information gained from the residents’ pre admission assessment and information gained from the resident and their family allows us to gain information regarding what their fluid intake has been like and also through fluid charts for the first four weeks, allows us to monitor fluid intake. Hydration trolleys are in effect at the home, one each shift one person is allocated to be responsible for ensuring that residents’ fluid intake is monitored and documented accurately. This was discussed at the care plan training and how to accurately record fluid intake. All staff are required to ensure that they record intake in millilitres, “mls” in all entries so that the electronic care record system automatically picks up the intake and calculates it.”

    Source location

    Response from Runwood Homes
    Page 2 · response
    Published 1 December 2022

    Open published response
  10. Lincolnshire

    AI-generated summary

    Lilian SHEARING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lilian SHEARING died in Lincoln County Hospital on 29 September 2019 after admission for unrelated medical treatment. Before her hospital admission, poor fluid intake was recorded at her care home, but no risk assessment was undertaken and omissions were made from the fluid intake chart; her intake was later estimated to have been approximately 25% of the expected level due to dehydration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake risk assessments for poor fluid and nutritional intake

    Wider context from the report

    “Upon admission on 11th July 2019 to your care home it was recorded at handover the deceased had a poor fluid intake. Despite this no risk assessment was undertaken. Omissions were also made from the fluid intake chart. It was conceded at Inquest today by your regional manager that the deceased's fluid intake was approximately 25% of where it should have been before her admission to hospital on 23rd August 2019 due to dehydration. Policies/assessments were clearly not in place to cover this eventuality. What are your current policies re risk assessments for fluid and nutritional intake? ”

    Source location

    Lilian SHEARING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of policies governing risks from poor fluid and nutritional intake

    Wider context from the report

    “Upon admission on 11th July 2019 to your care home it was recorded at handover the deceased had a poor fluid intake. Despite this no risk assessment was undertaken. Omissions were also made from the fluid intake chart. It was conceded at Inquest today by your regional manager that the deceased's fluid intake was approximately 25% of where it should have been before her admission to hospital on 23rd August 2019 due to dehydration. Policies/assessments were clearly not in place to cover this eventuality. What are your current policies re risk assessments for fluid and nutritional intake? ”

    Source location

    Lilian SHEARING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a two-stage admissions process requiring key documentation within 24 hours and a live care plan within seven days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have set up the admission process over two time frames the first being 24-hours to complete key documents, this can be done using a pre-assessment document and additional information from family members – a nutrition & hydration assessment is included – and the formulation of the remainder of the care plan within 7-days as this is a live document that will continually evolve. In addition to written referrals or transfer documents, residents and their families are actively involved in providing information which enables us to provide consistent, holistic care for the individual.”

    Source location

    Response from Tanglewood Cloverleaf Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed admission safeguards requiring risk assessments, daily charts, documented communications, timely referrals, and updates to residents and representatives.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Ensure that any risk assessments required are completed to ensure minimal risk to the person”

    Source location

    Response from Tanglewood Cloverleaf Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and amend the Nutrition and Hydration policy to cover intake recording, refusals, fluid targets, and discussions with clinicians and families.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Policy & Procedure We have reviewed the content of the Nutrition & Hydration policy and amended the content to include current practice of monitoring and recording all intake (see appendix 1), how we support the resident who may be reluctant to accept food and fluids especially at end of life, and the importance of recording if a resident declines assistance or intervention. What we do if a residents daily fluid target appears excessive and is not consistently achieved over a 7-day period and how we manage and record the discussions with the GP and family members in relation to this.”

    Source location

    Response from Tanglewood Cloverleaf Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 October 2022

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026