Recurring concern

Failure to identify clinically significant medication risks

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Jul 2013•Latest report 3 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in medication review, reconciliation, prescribing or screening that concern recognising the clinical significance of a medicine, contraindication, interaction, toxicity, side-effect or existing medication.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to administer, monitor or supply medication where the concern is not specifically the identification of medication-related risk.
  • Excludes illicit or general drug-use hazards not tied to a medication-safety control.
  • Excludes generic failures to recognise symptoms or deterioration unless the report explicitly links them to medication-related risk.
  • Excludes generic communication, documentation or staffing deficiencies that are not dedicated to identifying medication risks.
Reports
54

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
58

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
100

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care8
NHS England6
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board5
Care Quality Commission4
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency4
NHS Surrey and Sussex Integrated Care Board3
Royal College of General Practitioners3
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB2
General Medical Council2
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership2
Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust2
Nursing and Midwifery Council2
Royal College of Psychiatrists2
Adelaide Medical Centre, London1
Alvaston Medical Centre1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Feni Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Feni Lee, who had Behçet’s syndrome, took an excessive quantity of colchicine over a two-week period in September 2017 and died in hospital on 17 September 2017 after developing severe side effects, including liver necrosis. The concerns included the thoroughness of the medication review, the failure to address her loss to hospital follow-up, and delays and ineffective processes for redirecting correspondence between two GP practices.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficiently thorough review of repeat medication

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) You informed the inquest that Bexley Medical Group has a system whereby all medication obtained by repeat prescription is reviewed annually. You could not say exactly when the review of Ms Lee’s medication took place (at that time it was not documented) but said it would have been towards the end of 2016. You said the review looked at the need for ongoing medication and the dose. There were a number of features that do not appear to have been taken into account at this review: a. Colchicine is an unlicensed usage of a drug used to treat a rare disorder. It was being prescribed by the GP under instructions from a specialist hospital clinic. b. There had been no instructions from Guys as to what should be prescribed since January 2016. c. The instructions from Guys in January 2016 do not mention colchicine. No inquiry was made with Guys to check whether the intention was for it to be continued as part of the treatment, and yet it continued to be given by the GP as a repeat prescription. d. The dosage being given on repeat prescription does not match any of the recent instructions from Guys about its use. e. Ms Lee had mental health problems and was a vulnerable person. I therefore have concerns about the thoroughness of this medication review. (2) Towards the end of 2016 it would have been obvious that Ms Lee had been lost to follow up at the hospital, and so the drug review appears to have been a lost opportunity to rectify this. ”

    Source location

    Feni Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement medication reviews for patients without a review for over 12 months, using EMIS searches, clinician prompts, and recall monitoring for higher-risk medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have started implementing our plan to carry out medication reviews in all patients, who have not had a review for over 12 months. Our new software EMIS, which was installed in June 2018, is able to support searches of any outstanding medication review. We have reviewed over 86% of patients taking four or more drugs, and 63% of patients taking one to three drugs.”

    Source location

    2019-0224-Response-by-Bexley-Medical-Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 September 2019

    Open published response
  2. Central Hampshire

    AI-generated summary

    Sasha Sabrina FORSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sasha Sabrina FORSTER, a 20-year-old woman with a lengthy history of mental health disorders, self-harm and overdoses, died by suicide following deliberate ingestion of a fatal overdose of Propranolol tablets. The inquest identified concerns that hospitals and police forces were not always aware of their powers and responsibilities when her section 17 leave was revoked, or had not agreed and updated a common plan, resulting in inconsistent actions and an increased risk to Sasha.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of access to relevant psychiatric and prescribing history when prescribing Propranolol

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was heard at the inquest that after her treating psychiatrist had stopped prescribing her Propranolol, due to the risk of overdose, Sasha visited two private GPs at a clinic in London, on occasions two weeks apart. In each consultation Sasha: - requested Propranolol, on the basis that it was currently being prescribed to her for anxiety; - revealed a limited history of mental health issues; - failed to reveal either her extensive overdose history or the fact that her treating psychiatrist had stopped prescribing her Propranolol. Without details of Sasha’s GP or her treating psychiatrist, or her consent to contact them ( neither of which was given ), neither GP had the means of discovering her worrying psychiatric background. Had they had those means, it is likely that neither GP would have given her a 28 day supply of Propranolol. Whilst it could not be proven that the Propranolol prescribed by these GPs was the Propranolol used by Sasha for her final, fatal overdose, there remained at the time a considerable risk that she would so use it. ”

    Source location

    Sasha Sabrina FORSTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate relevant prescribing guidance extracts to support safe prescribing and patient safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regards to prescribing, the GMC’s guidance is clear that a doctor must only prescribe when they have adequate knowledge of the patient’s health. This will involve making an assessment, together with the patient, of their condition and having, or taking, an adequate history.”

    Source location

    Sasha-Forster-R2019-01694
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Refer information about the private GPs to an Assistant Registrar to determine whether the investigation threshold is met.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Conduct of individual doctors When a doctor fails to adhere to our ethical guidance the GMC must establish whether our threshold for investigation has been met; namely, whether the doctor’s conduct, if proven, is capable of amounting to impaired fitness to practise to a degree warranting action on their registration.”

    Source location

    Sasha-Forster-R2019-01694
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore Graphnet as an integrated care record providing organisations read-only access to legal status, risks and contemporaneous care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is a long term goal to create a platform that will allow NHS organisations to have read only access to key information pulled from a service user’s internal record keeping platforms. Graphnet is currently being explored to provide an integrated care record across Surrey. This will potentially be able to show that a person is currently detained in hospital allowing other organisations to see their legal status, as well as associated risks. Were a system such as this in place in early 2017 this would have allowed staff at the acute hospitals to view Sasha’s legal status and contemporaneous care plans; this would have assisted their decision making and meant that the system would have had read only access to the notes from her interactions with other services.”

    Source location

    Sasha-Forster-R2019-01692
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing GMC prescribing guidance, when followed, is considered sufficient to ensure safe practice and protect patient safety.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Turning to the matter of concern relating to the prescribing of propranolol. My officials have made enquiries and I am aware that the General Medical Council (GMC) has responded to you to explain that its prescribing guidance² is clear that a doctor must only prescribe when they have adequate knowledge of the patient’s health. This should involve making an assessment together with the patient of their condition and having, or taking, an adequate history. A patient’s consent to contact their GP should be sought if more information, or confirmation of the information available, is needed before prescribing. The GMC is confident that its guidance, when followed, ensures safe practice and protects patient safety.”

    Source location

    Sasha-Forster-R2019-0169
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing prescribing guidance is considered sufficient to ensure safe prescribing and protect patient safety when followed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have enclosed extracts of the relevant sections of our ethical guidance at Annex A of this letter; and, we consider that this guidance, when followed, ensures safe prescribing and protects patient safety.”

    Source location

    Sasha-Forster-R2019-01694
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 August 2019

    Open published response
  3. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Theresa Margaret Feehan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Theresa Margaret Feehan, who had severe oxygen- and steroid-dependent allergic asthma, was found deceased at home on 12 March 2018. The court recorded aspiration pneumonia and ingestion of amitriptyline and dihydrocodeine as the medical cause of death, with natural causes combined with side effects of prescribed medication. Concerns included inadequate medication review, incomplete medical-history recording, poor correlation between medication and problem lists, insufficient systems for identifying harmful medication interactions, and inadequate supervision of administrative work.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a system to address harmful medication interactions and redundant treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “4. That there appears to be no clear system for identifying medications which may interact to the detriment of the patient or no system to address such issues should they arise such as reducing or stopping redundant treatment thus putting patients at risk. ”

    Source location

    Theresa Margaret Feehan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inspections ultimately found no concerns in the areas identified, so there was no basis for enforcement action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The provider made significant challenges to the findings we made. We accepted those challenges and decided there was no basis for us to take enforcement action. We also carried out a full and comprehensive rated inspection in June 2019. I attach copies of the reports of both of these inspections. They are also available on our website under the “All reports” link at https://www.cqc.org.uk/location/1-549237033.”

    Source location

    2019-0070-Amended-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2019

    Open published response
  4. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Malcolm John Rathmell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Malcolm Rathmell was admitted after a fall and his pelvic fracture was not diagnosed until several days later. He was incorrectly given warfarin intended for another patient, subsequently suffered retroperitoneal bleeding, and died after developing bronchopneumonia. Concerns included failures to identify the incorrect prescription, the absence of a ward-based pharmacy review, and insufficient implemented action to address the risk of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify incorrect warfarin prescribing

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mr Rathmell was treated and reviewed by a number of medical professionals from various disciplines between 14.03.18 and 22.03.18. No one identified during that time that he was being prescribed warfarin incorrectly. ”

    Source location

    Malcolm John Rathmell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    Thomas Paul Arthur JACKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thomas Paul Arthur Jackson was found in a poorly state in his room at a secure unit within St George’s Hospital, Stafford, in the early hours of 25 August 2016 and was certified dead at 02.25 hours. The inquest recorded clozapine toxicity and pneumonia as causes of death, with treatment-resistant schizophrenia also noted; the substantive concern was the lack of a national policy for regular blood plasma monitoring of patients receiving clozapine.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of staff to recognise Clozapine significance, side-effects and warning signs of deterioration

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) It is clear that Clozapine is a beneficial drug for many patients and that a large number of patients in the care of the Trust do receive this drug. However it appears that many staff are not aware of the significance of this medication particularly when considering potential side-effects and warning signs of deterioration. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Paul Arthur JACKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Flora Marion BABER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Flora Marion Baber was admitted to the Royal Free Hospital from Compton Lodge Care Home on 25 January 2018 with increased confusion, slurred speech and difficulty breathing, and died there about a month later. Concerns included inadequate access to fluids, inappropriate food and eating assistance, delays in speech and language referral and treatment of oral thrush, an apparently sleeping staff member, inappropriate responses to toileting requests, and failure to record her opioid sensitivity across healthcare settings.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise opioid sensitivity when prescribing or administering opioids

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Dr Baber had a sensitivity to opioids, such that her family noted a direct correlation between episodes of sickness and vomiting, and the administration of opioid medication. This had been recognised and recorded during earlier admissions to the Royal Free, and family had discussed with staff at the care home. However, it was not recorded as an alert on her hospital notes, or on her general practitioner notes, or on the care home notes. At the very end of Dr Baber’s life, the benefit of pain relief was thought to outweigh the side effects of opiates, but before then her sensitivity was simply not recognised. This caused her discomfort and distress, and in another case could have fatal consequences. ”

    Source location

    Flora Marion BABER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Appoint a nurse-qualified Clinical Services Manager to support medication audits and staff training across the homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “vii) C&C have appointed a Clinical Services Manager who is nurse qualified and supports the Homes with medication audits and provides support and training for staff in this area.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-CC-Housing-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out enhanced refresher training on care-plan documentation, medication administration, and recording residents’ conditions and needs across C&C homes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “i) Since the incident at Compton Lodge, C&C have reviewed and increased the training given to staff across all of its Homes, around care plan documentation and medication administration, to ensure our residents' safety. Further training focuses upon good practice around recording and evidencing information about the residents' conditions and needs, which is discussed and demonstrated in full. This has been developed as part of staff refresher training, which is currently being rolled out throughout our Care Homes, by our Quality and Compliance Manager. This should be completed by the end of this year.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-CC-Housing-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and further develop medication training with the Quality and Compliance Manager, Clinical Services Manager and Director of Workplace and Culture.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iii) The development of further medication training is currently under review with our Quality and Compliance Manager, the Clinical Services Manager and the Director of Workplace Culture. The review is due to be completed within the next 3 months. Training already includes a formal face to face training session with a comprehensive test at the end which requires a 100% pass rate. This is in addition to the online training programme”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-CC-Housing-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to record and check allergies and sensitivities on every admission and discharge, including manual updates to TTA forms and drug charts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Learning from this incident has already been shared with Pharmacy staff as well as at junior doctor prescribing teaching sessions to remind them all that allergies and sensitivities must be recorded and checked on each admission and discharge. The action to mitigate recurrence is to ensure that all staff are reminded about the need to manually record allergy/sensitives on the Freenet TTA form and drug charts.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-Royal-Free-London-Hospitsl-NHS-Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop an electronic process with IT and Cerner to record allergy information at admission and transfer it to discharge documentation, including assessing backdating options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a short term solution pharmacy are exploring the option with IT/Cerner to assess the best possible way to record allergies and transfer them from the point of admission (recording of allergy status on Cerner) to the automated pull of this data to the Freenet TTA. We would like to continue the current option of manual amendment of the allergy status on the Freenet TTA (as this can change through the patient’s stay in the hospital). We hope that Doctors, nurses, and pharmacists will be allowed the option to amend the allergy status in Freenet and Power chart on Cerner. There are a number of separate sets of programming codes for different templates required to implement these changes so this will take some time to embed, but the IT department have begun working on this.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-Royal-Free-London-Hospitsl-NHS-Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce EPR/EPMA functionality to populate discharge documentation with allergy status and prompt staff when allergy information is missing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the long term, once EPR/ EPMA (electronic prescribing system) is introduced in the trust this will automatically populate the TTA/discharge summary with the allergy status of the patient from the electronic prescription. It is expected that this will go live at Barnet and Chase Farm by the end of this year, and will be rolled out across the Royal Free site in 2019. There will be prompts on this system to alert staff when an allergy has not been recorded, and it will be more easily auditable than the current system.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-Royal-Free-London-Hospitsl-NHS-Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discussed appropriate coding of clinically significant opioid sensitivities in GP notes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• 18/09/2019: Meeting ████████, ████████ (Managing partner) and ████████ (Practice Manager); to discuss how the sensitivity to opioids could have been coded appropriately in the GP notes”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-Adelaide-Medical-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recorded the learning in an internal significant event and shared it with all practice clinicians, including the opioid-sensitivity alerting process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• This reflection/learning has been captured in a significant event and shared with the other clinicians in the practice.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-Adelaide-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Care staff cannot diagnose medication allergies or sensitivities and therefore cannot record family concerns in care plans without clinical confirmation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Any changes in the condition of the resident, including allergies, would also be noted on their care plan by the Team Leader, being informed by the hospital discharge letter and / or advice from the GP. Our residential Care Homes are not staffed by clinicians who are qualified to make diagnoses of medication allergies or sensitivities. We rely wholly on the GP, treating doctors and hospitals to communicate any medical changes and medication updates relevant to our residents.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-CC-Housing-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    GPs, treating doctors and hospitals must provide official clinical advice before medication allergies or changes can be recorded and communicated to pharmacists.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is important to clarify that if a resident develops an allergy to medication during their stay with us, we would expect confirmation from their GP or hospital before making any amendment to their care plan. Any information about a resident's allergy to medication would be advised in hospital discharge notes, or by the doctors in the form of an official letter. When a resident returns from hospital, a discharge letter should always be sent and a copy provided to the resident's GP to ensure that their records and those of the pharmacist are updated. Any advice concerning medication prescribed or any changes to such medication or dosage should also be recorded on their MAR chart.”

    Source location

    2018-0299-Response-by-CC-Housing-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 January 2019

    Open published response
  7. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Darren James CARRINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darren James CARRINGTON died after collapsing with a fatal level of Zopiclone in his blood and did not recover. The inquest concluded that the death was misadventure, being an impulsive overdose while under the influence of alcohol. Concerns included the prescribing of potentially dependency-forming medication, excessive Zopiclone prescribing over 57 days, and the ability of receptionists and clinicians to override computer warnings and other safeguards.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to apply adequate safeguards when prescribing potentially dependence-forming or misused medication

    Wider context from the report

    “The method of prescribing medication such as Zopiclone (in this case), Codeine, Morphine, Benzodiazepines etc. to patients which suggests that they either are or are very likely to be becoming dependent upon such medications or are misusing them. Examples of both the above would be too frequent requests for repeat prescriptions and information concerning a history of overdoses. The Inquest discussed whether circumstances, including those outlined above should trigger an automatic/mandatory medication review conducted with the patient; consideration of a different prescribing period and very careful monitoring of the online requests for repeat prescriptions. Alternatively, there could be a ban on the requests for repeat prescriptions with the repeats simply being issued for an appropriate period of time “automatically”. In this case as you will see from ████████ report, over twice the appropriate amount of Zopiclone was issued over a period of 57 days. The patient in question had Zopiclone present at a fatal level in his blood at the time of his collapse from which he never recovered. I remain very worried about these prescribing issues and about the fact that apparently receptionists and clinicians can override the warnings in the surgery’s computer system. I should like this to be carefully investigated and look forward to hearing with a response within the relevant time period. I realise that the situation may be exacerbated by GPs working part time and many part time practitioners being involved in the prescribing procedure as well as many receptionists being involved in it but if this is the trend then it seems to me the safeguards must be extended not made easier to override. The other ‘failsafe device’ is the dispensing pharmacist. When repeats are requested online there is a designated pharmacy. They receive emailed scripts. Their own systems should flag up cases of over or too frequent prescribing as well as other matters. ”

    Source location

    Darren James CARRINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss discharge-information requirements with Emergency Department medical staff through regular governance meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am very sorry that Mr Carrington's GP, Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and Pavilions did not receive adequate information concerning the details of Mr Carrington’s mixed overdose and accept that this does not reflect good continuity of care. I can confirm that this has been fed back to ████████, Clinical Director for Emergency and Acute Medicine and to ████████, Consultant and Governance Lead for Emergency Medicine. ████████ have discussed these issues with all medical staff as part of the Emergency Department regular governance meetings to highlight the issues that arose from Mr Carrington’s attendances and the importance of ensuring that discharge letters contain sufficient detail.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase staff awareness of frequent requests for small medication quantities as potential risk indicators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm that the following changes have been implemented at North Laine Surgery via a Practice Meeting attended by all staff:-”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Commission-Alliance-
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit records of patients receiving Zopiclone and review their prescribed quantities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm that the following changes have been implemented at North Laine Surgery via a Practice Meeting attended by all staff:-”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Commission-Alliance-
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review high-risk prescribing records and remove online prescription-request access for weekly, controlled, dependency-forming and potentially abusive medicines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Records of all patients receiving weekly prescriptions have been reviewed and access to on-line requests have been removed.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Commission-Alliance-
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide protected administrative and clinical staff time to manage prescription requests.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Arrangements have been made to ensure administrative and clinical staff have adequate, protected time to manage prescription requests.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Commission-Alliance-
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss sharing the high-risk medication review protocol with a linked practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Ongoing discussions with linked Practice around sharing high risk medication review protocol.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Commission-Alliance-
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lower computer-alert thresholds for early prescription ordering and increase awareness of relevant alerts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Computer settings changed with a view to lower thresholds for flagging up early ordering of scripts and increased awareness around the potential significance of these and other alerts.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Commission-Alliance-
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed the high-risk drug review protocol with support from the Medication Management team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our Medication Management team are providing ongoing support. In particular, around embedding The High Risk Drug review protocol mentioned above, as well as ensuring that the new Practice Repeat Prescribing Policy covers current best practice.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Commission-Alliance-
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure the new Practice Repeat Prescribing Policy covers current best practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our Medication Management team are providing ongoing support. In particular, around embedding The High Risk Drug review protocol mentioned above, as well as ensuring that the new Practice Repeat Prescribing Policy covers current best practice.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-Commission-Alliance-
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit Zopiclone prescribing to verify repeat-template intervals, doses and limits, and reduce some prescription amounts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. An audit of all patients on Zopiclone was carried out to ensure that limits and doses were correctly entered on the system. There was no evidence that any other patients had over-ordered or done so too early.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remove online prescription requests for controlled drugs and drugs of potential abuse or dependence, following patient assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Access to online requests for controlled drugs has been removed for all patients. Following discussion with the patient and their doctor, this may be restored if the patient is considered “low-risk”.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Change computer-system thresholds so early-order warnings appear one day before due dates and online ordering closes three days before due dates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. An investigation into online ordering and script generation by the computer system was conducted in conjunction with the practice IT co-ordinator. As a result, the timings were changed within the system so that warnings about scripts being ordered too early were changed from 7 to 1 day and ordering online from 10 to 3 days.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add patients who overdose to the weekly prescription list.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Patients who overdose will be added to the weekly script list.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise the practice prescribing policy using CCG pharmaceutical advice and discuss the updated policy in a whole-practice meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. There has been an extensive revision of the practice prescribing policy incorporating suggestions from the CCG pharmaceutical adviser and we are having a practice meeting on 24th July to discuss further. We look forward to working with her again over the next year to improve further our systems.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise receptionist and GP awareness of patients ordering prescriptions too early, including when requested amounts appear small.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. There has been a raised awareness of the potential of any patient to over-order medication, whether by accident or design.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review patients receiving controlled drugs and agree medication-reduction or cessation plans with them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9. A whole practice meeting took place on 24th July to discuss the updated practice prescribing policy. Ongoing review of patients on controlled drugs ████████ ████████ will occur and a plan to reduce and/or stop agreed with the patient. This will complement what the practice already has put in place over the past 2 years in terms of reduction programmes for patients.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a computer-generated warning identifying patients with overdoses or suicide attempts when high-risk medicines are requested.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “10. A further meeting is planned with the practice IT coordinator to highlight automatically patients who have taken an overdose when certain high-risk drugs are requested. We hope to have this in place shortly.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Copy all GPs into reports of overdoses and other suicide attempts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action plan following meeting held on 22nd May which have been implemented by the practice.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Code all overdoses and suicide attempts in the practice system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action plan following meeting held on 22nd May which have been implemented by the practice.”

    Source location

    2018-0181-Response-from-North-Laine-Medical-Centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response
  8. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Jonathan Earp · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jonathan Earp died at Gloucester Royal Hospital on 10 July 2017 from the effects of prescribed and non-prescribed drugs. Concerns included the management and disposal of Fentanyl patches and the possibility that additional Fentanyl was taken alongside illicit drugs without staff considering the combined effects.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider concurrent use of additional fentanyl and illicit medication and its effects

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard during the inquest that Mr Earp had been prescribed Fentanyl which was administered by way of transdermal patches. Mr Earp repeatedly requested additional patches however there was no evidence that all of the "unsent" patches had been returned to the nursing staff or appropriately discarded. The clinical staff believed that Mr Earp was accessing illicit drugs when he left the ward, however there was no evidence that staff considered that he may have been taking additional Fentanyl and illicit medication, and the effect this could have. ”

    Source location

    Jonathan Earp · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish opioid-user ward management guidelines covering prescribing advice and specialist input.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Review policy and flowchart on “OPIOID USERS ON THE WARD – MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES” | These guidelines have been drawn up to advise doctors, nurses and pharmacists on managing patients who have an opioid pain management pathway, and to provide further advice on prescribing from the Acute Pain Management team and/or providers of the Drug dependency service. | Consultant for Acute Pain Management | July 2018 | Complete”

    Source location

    2018-0135-Response-by-Gloucestershire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 1 July 2018

    Open published response
  9. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela Margaret Hands aka Horner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela Margaret Hands, also known as Horner, fell at home and was admitted to hospital with a periprosthetic femur fracture. After receiving opioid analgesia and a local anaesthetic nerve block, she was not adequately observed, was found unresponsive, and died on 1 December 2015. The principal concerns were inadequate monitoring after the block, insufficient recognition of relative opioid toxicity, and the absence of national guidance on post-procedure monitoring and related risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of recognition among emergency medicine professionals of relative opioid toxicity after local anaesthetic nerve block

    Wider context from the report

    “The Expert Consultant in Pain Medicine explained that after the fascia iliac block was administered analgesia will occur over 10-15 minutes. As the patient obtains better analgesia from the fascia iliac block, the opioids in the circulation would have a more toxic effect than an analgesic effect. Pain is a potential arousal stimulus keeping the patient awake and aware of their surroundings. Pain is also a respiratory stimulant. There is an intimate link between the neurophysiology of pain and the respiratory stimulant. It was recognised that removing a painful stimulus using a local anaesthetic block can pre-dispose patients who have had opioids to respiratory depression. The risk can be increased if the patient has other respiratory depressant risks such as alcohol which can act synergistically with the opioid. In order to avoid this, the patient would need to be observed during the first 30 minutes after the administration of the block to reverse the effect of the opioid or support the respiration if required to avoid a cardiac arrest and death. At the time of the death were no National Guidelines to advise on the need to monitor patients post procedure or application of the anaesthetic nerve block At inquest it was clear from the evidence of the Clinical Director of Emergency Medicine that in 2015 the effect of relative opioid toxicity following the administration of a local anaesthetic nerve block for proximal femur fractures was not widely recognised within Emergency Medicine. As there was an increase in the use of fascia iliac block in conjunction with opioid analgesia in emergency medicine, this risk should be highlighted to health professionals so that they were aware of the risk and the appropriate guidelines put in place. ”

    Source location

    Pamela Margaret Hands aka Horner · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Percy Jacks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Percy Jacks died from a pulmonary embolus after being found unresponsive the morning following treatment for chest pain. The report identified failings in the management of his anticoagulation medication, including poor communication between the hospital, GP surgery and care home, and inadequate systems for ensuring the medication continued for the intended period.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of medication review for correct Rivaroxaban dosage and duration

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The system within the GP surgery for prescribing Rivaroxaban was poor and relied solely on receiving the notification of the results of the scan from the hospital. There was no facility to review the medication to ensure that the correct dosage for the correct period of time continued to be prescribed. ”

    Source location

    Percy Jacks · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026