Recurring concern

Unreliable clinical correspondence from healthcare services to GPs

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 12 Sep 2013•Latest report 17 Aug 2022

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in preparing, quality-checking, dispatching or timely delivering clinical letters and comparable correspondence from healthcare services to GPs when the correspondence contains information needed for assessment, treatment, referral, medication management or continuity of care.

Not included

  • Excludes failures to review or act on correspondence after it has been reliably received by the GP practice; those belong to incoming-correspondence handling concerns.
  • Excludes discharge summaries and patient-facing discharge information where those named processes provide the more specific supported boundary.
  • Excludes generic communication, record-keeping or staffing deficiencies unless they directly impair outgoing clinical correspondence to GPs.
  • Excludes correspondence to non-GP recipients unless the assertion explicitly supports the same GP-facing clinical-correspondence process.
Reports
13

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
14

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2022

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
18

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care4
Ashfield House Surgery1
Association Of British Neurologists1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
Birmingham Women'S and Children'S NHS Foundation Trust1
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council1
College of Policing1
Cornerstone Family Practice1
Dorset County Council1
Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust1
Dorset Police1
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership1
Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust1
Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Philip Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Philip Jones developed difficulty swallowing in February 2021, lost significant weight, and was diagnosed with Motor Neurone Disease after hospital admission in September 2021. He developed bronchopneumonia, deteriorated, was discharged home, and died there on 9 October 2021. Concerns included backlogs for neurology appointments, incompatible IT systems affecting information sharing, and delays in communications from consultants to other clinicians and patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in consultants communicating diagnostic and treatment information after appointments or assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The Inquest heard that there were delays in communications from consultants to other clinicians e.g. GPs and patients following appointments/assessments due to a shortage of administrative support for consultants. This meant that important diagnostic/treatment information about patients was not shared expeditiously. ”

    Source location

    Philip Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Build digital infrastructure using artificial intelligence, automation and video-call technologies to support NHS services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I also note your concern that incompatible IT systems between the hospitals in question made communication and information sharing in relation to Mr Jones’s treatment more difficult, as did the delay in the consultants communicating with other clinicians, including GPs, and as well as the patients themselves. I recognise that there needs to be adequate administrative support and greater use of digital technology to assist healthcare workers in completing non-clinical tasks, and that could increase the time they can spend caring for patients. This would provide a better patient experience and, ultimately, improve health outcomes.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 October 2022

    Open published response
  2. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Kellum Paul Thomas · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kellum Paul Thomas, aged thirteen, collapsed at home on 9 June 2021 and died after a cardiac arrest caused by ventricular tachycardia deteriorating into ventricular fibrillation. Concerns included an 18-month gap without a functioning REVEAL heart-monitoring device, delayed replacement processes, and a significantly delayed outpatient letter containing medication and investigation information. The report also identified stretched team capacity and resources and stated that necessary actions to address these issues were not confirmed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in sending outpatient letters containing important clinical information

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Kellum’s outpatient letter from ████████ to both the GP and to Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust (where shared care was provided) was very delayed, with the outpatient appointment completed in March 21, and the letter not reaching its destinations until mid June 21, after Kellums death. This letter contained important information re a change in medication dosage and a request for NUH to arrange a further investigation. Again this issue appeared to be one of team capacity and resources. ”

    Source location

    Kellum Paul Thomas · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Gaia Kima Pope-Sutherland · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gaia Kima Pope-Sutherland, who had epilepsy and mental health conditions, left her aunt’s address in a psychotic state on 7 November 2017 and was later found deceased on 18 November 2017. The jury concluded that she probably died from hypothermia between 15.59 on 7 November and 10.00 on 8 November 2017. Principal concerns included under-resourcing and poor communication between epilepsy, neurology and mental health services, as well as issues concerning police training, missing-person policies and record keeping, and communication and information sharing within mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of Mental Health teams to provide assessment information directly to GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “x. As per paragraph 1(xiii) above, when a Mental Health Act assessment is undertaken, there is a possibility that information may not be fed back to the GP in the best way or in a timely manner, if it is not fed back by those from the Mental Health team, and I therefore request that consideration is given to the DHUFT representatives forwarding information, directly to the GP, rather than through the discharging team at the acute hospital. This may include their RiO record notes, or their assessment notes. ”

    Source location

    Gaia Kima Pope-Sutherland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delay in AMHP feedback of Mental Health Act assessment information to GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “xi. As per paragraph 1(xiv) above, in respect of the feeding back of information to the GP by the AMHP which is detailed at paragraph 2.10 of Standard Operating Procedure for the flow of information following Mental Health Act assessments, I would request that consideration is given by Dorset County Council, BCP Council and DHUFT to reducing this timeframe from 7 days to 72 hours. Although this is a decision for Dorset County Council and BCP Council, the document is a DHUFT document and so will require their consideration too. ”

    Source location

    Gaia Kima Pope-Sutherland · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an updated standard operating procedure governing information flow after Mental Health Act assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In respect of the care provided to Gaia, the Trust remains of the view set out in the RCA report (and reiterated by Trust witnesses), that Gaia did not meet the eligibility criteria for CMHT care on the occasions she was discharged from CMHT care in December 2016 and March 2017, and also at the point she was assessed under the Mental Health Act (“MHA”) in October 2017. That is not to diminish the difficulties Gaia faced, or her level of distress. We do not dispute that the failure to refer Gaia to Steps to Wellbeing (“STWB”) for her Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in December 2016 was a missed opportunity. There were also missed opportunities in terms of the assessment and onward plan of care following the MHA assessment in October 2017, which are acknowledged by the Trust and formed part of the jury’s conclusions.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Dorset Healthcare University
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement a RiO template for Section 12 doctors to send key Mental Health Act assessment information directly to GPs, with corresponding guidance and SOP amendments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This requirement has been considered by ████████ Deputy Chief Medical Officer. You heard during the course of the inquest (and as part of Dorset Council’s evidence) that relevant information and a report following the assessment will be provided to the GP by the Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP), who is part of and coordinates the assessing team. Dr ████████ has met with his clinical colleagues and it has been agreed that (in addition to this information provided by the AMHP):”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Dorset Healthcare University
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage with Dorset Healthcare Trust to agree amendments to the Pan-Dorset Standard Operating Procedure for information distribution.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are actively engaging with Dorset Healthcare Trust to agree the necessary amendments to the Pan-Dorset Standard Operating Procedure. We are of the view that the Standard Operating Procedure standard for distributing information is too slow and we will continue to apply the requirement of 72 hours.”

    Source location

    Response from BCP Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue applying the 72-hour requirement for distributing completed Mental Health Act assessment reports.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The AMHP must then complete their full (or final) report within 2 hours of completing their assessment (or by the end of their shift if they are an out of hours worker) and again distribute this to the receiving Ward (if relevant), the Mental Health Legislation office, General Practitioner, Care Co-ordinator, the Medics involved in the assessment and the AMHP Lead within 72 hours.”

    Source location

    Response from BCP Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss with Approved Mental Health Professionals how to succinctly share information with GPs, highlighting information of immediate relevance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also in the process of discussing with AMHP's how they could succinctly share information with GP’s, and in particular highlighting that information which is of most immediate relevant to them.”

    Source location

    Response from BCP Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reduce the timeframe for forwarding the initial completed AMHP report to the assessed person’s GP from seven days to 72 hours.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dorset Council has reduced the recommendation to reduce the timeframe from 7 days to 72 hours to forward the completed AMHP report to the assessed persons GP. From the 1st of August 2022 Dorset Council put in place a new internal data reporting system. This system now enables the AMHP duty manager and business support, for the AMHP’s, to monitor that the initial AMHP report is completed and emailed to the GP within 72 hours. This also ensures that there is tracking of the full AMHP report, which is then sent by secure e-mail to the GP within 7 days of a person having had a Mental Health Act”

    Source location

    Response from Dorset Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement internal reporting to monitor 72-hour initial reports, track full reports, and share monthly performance information with senior managers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dorset Council has reduced the recommendation to reduce the timeframe from 7 days to 72 hours to forward the completed AMHP report to the assessed persons GP. From the 1st of August 2022 Dorset Council put in place a new internal data reporting system. This system now enables the AMHP duty manager and business support, for the AMHP’s, to monitor that the initial AMHP report is completed and emailed to the GP within 72 hours. This also ensures that there is tracking of the full AMHP report, which is then sent by secure e-mail to the GP within 7 days of a person having had a Mental Health Act”

    Source location

    Response from Dorset Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require AMHPs to complete mandatory internal training on confidential information sharing following Mental Health Act assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is a Continuing Professional Development record which all AMHPs must complete to evidence their registration and approval as an AMHP. The Council also now requires AMHPs to have internal mandatory training about the sharing of confidential information in relation to the Mental Health Act assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from Dorset Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust’s discharge-information procedure and statutory Mental Health Act guidance are relied upon to address communication after mental health assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regard to Ms Pope-Sutherland’s discharge from hospital, my officials have informed me that the Trust has introduced a Standard Operating Procedure in May 2022, which covers the provision of information following Mental Health Act assessments. In addition, the”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing AMHP requirements and quality assurance arrangements already require recording and sharing assessment outcomes within specified timescales.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The BCP Council Approved Mental Health Professionals (AMHP) Service uses the Mental Health Act 1983 (amended 2007) and the Code of Practice to inform practice standard, which are monitored through an AMHP Quality Assurance Framework.”

    Source location

    Response from BCP Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Full AMHP reports cannot be completed within 72 hours because shift patterns and rota arrangements prevent timely completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dorset Council has reduced the recommendation to reduce the timeframe from 7 days to 72 hours to forward the completed AMHP report to the assessed persons GP. From the 1st of August 2022 Dorset Council put in place a new internal data reporting system. This system now enables the AMHP duty manager and business support, for the AMHP’s, to monitor that the initial AMHP report is completed and emailed to the GP within 72 hours. This also ensures that there is tracking of the full AMHP report, which is then sent by secure e-mail to the GP within 7 days of a person having had a Mental Health Act”

    Source location

    Response from Dorset Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reducing the information-feedback timeframe is a decision for Dorset Council and BCP Council, with the Trust able to update its SOP only after agreement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6) As per paragraph 1(xiv) above, in respect of the feeding back of information to the GP by the AMHP which is detailed at paragraph 2.10 of the Standard Operating Procedure for the flow of information following Mental Health Act assessments, I would request that consideration is given by Dorset County Council, BCP Council and DHUFT to reducing this timeframe from 7 days to 72 hours. Although this is a decision for Dorset County Council and BCP Council, the document is a DHUFT document and so will require their consideration too.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Dorset Healthcare University
    Page 5 · response
    Published 28 September 2022

    Open published response
  4. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs. Monica McCormick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs. Monica McCormick developed a colonic perforation in October 2019 and underwent emergency surgery, after which pathology identified adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis was not communicated to her or her general practitioner until April 2020, following cancelled outpatient appointments, and the cancer had then spread to the liver and abdominal cavity. She died at home on 24 May 2020; the concerns included failures to follow up the pathology result, review medical records, communicate the diagnosis, and make an earlier referral for adjuvant chemotherapy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate pathology reports to general practitioners at hospital discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The pathology report was not communicated to her general practitioner at the time she was discharged from hospital. ”

    Source location

    Mrs. Monica McCormick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the response at the Divisional Surgery Governance Meeting and discuss the importance of checking medical records during handover completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We apologise that the team did not check whether there had been a histopathology diagnosis at the time of discharge. We will share this PFD response at the Divisional of Surgery Governance Meeting and discuss with team members the importance of checking medical records in full when completing the Handover of Care Communication. It is important to highlight that these documents are completed throughout the patient admission to ensure a timely discharge once the patient is considered medically fit or optimised. We”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Directly communicating cancer diagnoses to GPs at discharge is not standard; supported outpatient disclosure is considered best practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dr Tierney has reviewed the case and confirms that the pathology report was not communicated to Mrs McCormick’s general practitioner (GP) at the time of discharge from hospital. However disclosure to GP at this time would not be standard practice. Any letter sent to the GP is also copied to the patient; this therefore would create the risk of a patient being made aware of a cancer diagnosis without appropriate support in place on receipt of the information.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicating a cancer diagnosis to the GP at discharge is not standard practice because it could disclose the diagnosis without appropriate patient support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ has reviewed the case and confirms that the pathology report was not communicated to Mrs McCormick’s general practitioner (GP) at the time of discharge from hospital. However disclosure to GP at this time would not be standard practice. Any letter sent to the GP is also copied to the patient; this therefore would create the risk of a patient being made aware of a cancer diagnosis without appropriate support in place on receipt of the information.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 February 2021

    Open published response
  5. London (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Sophie Holman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sophie Holman, a 10-year-old girl with chronic asthma, died on 13 December 2017 after collapsing during a severe asthma attack while being taken to hospital. The report identifies concerns about inadequate long-term management, fragmented records, failure to recognise the cumulative severity and risks of her asthma, lack of a coordinated asthma action plan and safety-netting, and missed opportunities for specialist referral.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate changed asthma medication to primary care

    Wider context from the report

    “In the secondary care there was: a) Failure to recognise and act upon the underlying chronic condition punctuated by a number of severe attacks with life threatening features one of which was a near-fatal attack where Sophie was ‘blue and unresponsive’ with an oxygen saturation of 86% (2.7.2012) b) Failure to recognise the need for and initiate referral of this child to a specialist respiratory service as recommended in the NRAD recommendations c) Failure to take appropriate action when it was known that the family had a home nebuliser d) Failure to implement the recommendations in the NICE Quality Statement 25, and BTS/SIGN guideline to ensure a pre-discharge review of the child’s asthma by an appropriately trained individual e) Failure to effectively communicate changed medication in 2013 of the child to the general practitioner f) Implementation of a hospital policy whereby this child was discharged from secondary care three times because of failure of the parents to bring the child to planned outpatient appointments g) No clear evidence of detailed specific safety netting advice and over-reliance on prescription of unlicensed, non-evidence based high dose salbutamol ‘weaning plans’ which may have masked recognition of deteriorating signs due to a requirement for excess reliever medication ”

    Source location

    Sophie Holman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. London (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Maureen Anne CAMPBELL-SCOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maureen Anne Campbell-Scott died from multiple injuries after falling from a ledge at the Exchange Shopping Centre car park on 16 June 2017. The report identified concerns about delays and errors in mental health referrals, delayed communication of medication changes, prescribing that did not always follow specialist directions, and a lack of joint working between mental health services and the GP practice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in delivery of mental health clinic letters to GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There were often delays (in excess of 14 days) in the delivery to the GP of clinic letters from the mental health trust. Often, the clinic letters contained requests for the GP to make changes to medication. ”

    Source location

    Maureen Anne CAMPBELL-SCOTT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send NELFT correspondence electronically using the patient’s NHS number and initials as the email subject, and communicate this practice to Redbridge GPs and mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2a | NELFT Action | All correspondence to be sent via email. Subject of emails to be patient NHS number and patient initials. | NELFT Dr Shweta Anand & Maria Thorn, Assistant Director | 18/05/18 | Completed”

    Source location

    2018-0090-Response-by-NELFT
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Kenneth Longley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kenneth Longley died at Tameside Hospital on 9 September 2017 after treatment for acute coronary syndrome and severe aortic stenosis led to an upper gastrointestinal bleed. The report identified delays in sending a cardiology referral letter and a lack of action by the GP practice after the letter and echocardiogram results were received.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in sending specialist clinical letters

    Wider context from the report

    “The letter from Doctor████████to Mr Longley’s GP was sent out on the 7th August 2017, nearly 3 months following the echocardiogram on the 16th May 2017. This appears to be a significant delay████████explained in evidence that there had been a delay in obtaining the medical records needed for████████to write the report to the GP but the cause of that delay was not known. It was not clear why the letter was only written on the 29th July 2017 and then not sent out until the 7th August 2017. Mr Longley had severe aortic stenosis. The evidence suggested that cardiac surgery would have been offered to Mr Longley and would have taken place within 3-6 months. In this case, it was not possible to determine whether the outcome would have been different for Mr Longley had the letter been sent out in a timely fashion. The concern is that there is a risk of future death if there is a delay in sending out similar letters in the future. ”

    Source location

    Kenneth Longley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Simon Willans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Simon Willans was admitted to Ysbyty Gwynedd with breathlessness, recent loss of consciousness and a swollen right calf, and was discharged with diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension and anxiety. He died from a pulmonary embolism the following day. Concerns included inadequate assessment and follow-up, failure to elicit a family history of pulmonary embolism, lack of safety-netting, and failure to commence heparin despite DVT/PE being a differential diagnosis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Addition of diagnoses to clinical correspondence without examining the patient

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Mr Willans appears to have been discharged by a Nurse Practioner ████████ who had no involvement in the care of Mr Willans. ████████, or any other doctor does not appear to have been involved in the discharge of Mr Willans. Nurse Practitioner Jones adds another diagnosis to the GP letter over and above that of her colleague despite never seeing the patient. ”

    Source location

    Simon Willans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Richard Paul Martin Grant · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Richard Paul Martin Grant was found deceased in his car in his garage on 7 January 2016 following inhalation of helium gas. He had previously self-harmed and threatened suicide, but his counselling referral was sent to the wrong team and an appointment was arranged for 22 February 2016. The report identified concerns about delays and failures in referring him to the appropriate mental health service and in informing his GP about the assessment and its outcome.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in sending assessment circumstances and outcomes to GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) A letter detailing ████████ assessment and the outcome of it was not sent to Mr. Grant’s GP until at least the 22nd December 2015, ████████ did not know why there was such a delay nor whether it was typical. There is a clear risk to life from GPs not being aware of the circumstances and outcome of assessments of patients who have attempted suicide for such an extended period. ”

    Source location

    Richard Paul Martin Grant · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an MHLS standard requiring assessment letters to be drafted within the same or following shift and dispatched within three working days.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. MHLS standard developed requiring all letters are drafted within the same or following shift and are dispatched within 3 working days. (Completed)”

    Source location

    2016-0157-Response-by-Black-Country-NHS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 April 2016

    Open published response
  10. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Jayne Jowett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jayne Jowett, who was resident in a low secure and locked rehabilitation mental health facility, became unwell with intermittent respiratory difficulties, low oxygen saturations, dizziness, breathlessness and episodes of collapse before she died of a pulmonary embolus on 23 September 2014. The report identified concerns about staff training and response to National Early Warning Scores, understanding of significant clinical signs, and the lack of clear arrangements for sharing physical-health information between the facility and the GP surgery.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear guidance for communicating patients’ physical condition to GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There remains no clear current service level agreement regarding how best for PIC to work with the local GP surgery to provide high quality joint care. There is no clear guidance that ensures all information regarding a patient’s physical condition is communicated to a GP when seeing a patient. ”

    Source location

    Jayne Jowett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026