Recurring concern

Failure to reliably notify primary care of changes affecting patient care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 9 Sep 2013•Latest report 15 Oct 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of dedicated notification arrangements to a patient's GP or outgoing primary-care practice about material changes affecting responsibility, access, admission or continuity of the patient's care, including care transfers, hospital admissions and non-engagement with referred services.

Not included

  • Excludes generic inter-agency communication or information-sharing failures where the notification is not specifically to primary care about a material change affecting patient care.
  • Excludes clinical information, medication details or discharge information unless the reported unsafe condition is failure to notify primary care of the relevant care-status change.
  • Excludes failures to notify patients, families, coroners, emergency services or other recipients where primary care is not the relevant notification recipient.
  • Excludes routine administrative updates that do not affect responsibility, access, admission or continuity of patient care.
Reports
21

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
22

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
18

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Aneurin Bevan University LHB2
Department of Health and Social Care2
London Ambulance Service NHS Trust2
Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care System1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Care Quality Commission1
Charing Healthcare Ltd1
Cricket Green Medical Practice1
Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust1
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust1
King's College Hospital1
Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust1
Litch Care Services Limited1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Central and South East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    Terence Ewart JAMES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Terence Ewart JAMES, aged 85, was living in a residential home when he sustained an unwitnessed fall on 17 April 2019 and a further fall on 20 April, resulting in a neck of femur fracture. He underwent surgery but became delirious, did not thrive, and died in hospital on 14 May 2019. Concerns included failures to inform the GP of the first fall, hand over the fall history to care staff, and escalate pain and deterioration for further medical advice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform attending GPs of falls before clinical attendance

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The GP was due to attend Mr James on 17th April and was not informed of his fall prior to his attendance. He had bruising and abrasion to his head and was on anticoagulation medication. The GP examined him and found no apparent neurological symptoms or fracture. He advised that if there was any deterioration to seek further urgent advice. The GP evidence was that he would have advised that Mr James be taken to hospital. ”

    Source location

    Terence Ewart JAMES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The GP escalation process cannot be unilaterally changed because it is driven by national general-practice arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “their associated GP surgery. Furthermore, we are not able to unilaterally change this process, as it is driven by national GP arrangements.”

    Source location

    2019-0430-Response-from-Charing-Healthcare-Redacted-1
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The errors were considered individual judgment calls rather than evidence of systemic failures in existing processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “into the processes in place before the inquest, and we do believe that where errors occurred, they were individual judgment calls, rather than systemic errors.”

    Source location

    2019-0430-Response-from-Charing-Healthcare-Redacted-1
    Page 5 · response
    Published 31 December 2019

    Open published response
  2. London Inner (West)

    AI-generated summary

    GILLIAN O’KEEFFE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gillian O’Keeffe had a serious mental illness and died at home on 19 March 2017 after taking her own life while the balance of her mind was disturbed. The concerns included her discharge from community mental health services for non-engagement despite family and professional concerns, inadequate communication with her GP and family, and the absence of a clear process for following up urgent concerns or referrals.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to coordinate pre-discharge handover and transition with the GP surgery

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was no pre-discharge multidisciplinary meeting to include and inform the GP before discharge nor attempt to ensure that there was a seamless transition to the GP surgery. ”

    Source location

    GILLIAN O’KEEFFE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Clinical Disengagement/Did Not Attend Policy to require GP engagement before discharge and audit adherence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have provided rationale for the decision to discharge but also acknowledge that more engagement should have taken place with key stakeholders prior to Mrs O’Keefe’s discharge. Since this incident, our Clinical Disengagement/Did Not Attend Policy has been updated. The updated version is more prescriptive with regards to what actions need to be taken before a patient can be discharged and this includes engagement with the GP and inclusion of the GP in the decision to discharge. Adherence to this policy is audited through our clinical audit programme.”

    Source location

    2017-0233-Response-by-South-West-London-and-St-Georges-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce GP involvement in discharge decisions through governance meetings and learning dissemination, with reinforcement through the clinical audit cycle.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust’s revised Clinical Disengagement/Did Not Attend Policy states that the team should liaise with the GP and invite them to be involved in the decision to discharge the patient.”

    Source location

    2017-0233-Response-by-South-West-London-and-St-Georges-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operational concerns about discharge and communication are the responsibility of the relevant NHS Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The matters raised are operational and relate to the South West London & St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust. However, it is important to make clear the national policy expectations in relation to the issues you have raised.”

    Source location

    2017-0233-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 October 2017

    Open published response
  3. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Raymond David SHEPHERD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Raymond David SHEPHERD had chronic ill health, severely limited mobility and a high risk of falls and self-neglect. In January 2016, care records noted repeated falls, poor appetite and a deterioration in his condition, but referrals to a GP or ambulance service were not made; he later sustained a femur fracture after a further fall and died in hospital on 30 January 2016. The principal concerns were poor care record-keeping, missed care visits, failure to escalate reported or observed falls and deterioration, and the absence of a mental capacity assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify the GP or ambulance service after reported or observed falls

    Wider context from the report

    “4. From 18 January 2016 there were at least three occasions when the deceased had either reported a fall or been found having after fallen, but no action was taken to notify the GP or ambulance service. ”

    Source location

    Raymond David SHEPHERD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Gwent

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Georgina Lewis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Georgina Lewis was discharged from a psychiatric unit on 23 September 2013, went missing from home on 27 September, and was found dead in woods near her home on 30 September 2013. Concerns included discharge without family consultation, no discharge plan or follow-up support, and delayed notification to her GP.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide the GP with contemporaneous notification of discharge and the assessment leading to discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was no contemporaneous notification to her GP of the discharge or the assessment leading to discharge, in fact the GP had still not received notification by the time of discovery of Mrs Lewis body ”

    Source location

    Mrs Georgina Lewis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    David Baddeley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Baddeley, who had a history of schizophrenia, died at home on 23 June 2015 after tying a ligature around his neck; the cause of death was recorded as hanging, with schizophrenia also noted. Concerns included delays and gaps in transferring and reviewing medical records, incompatibility between electronic systems, and the failure to identify his psychiatric illness and lack of antipsychotic medication during primary-care handovers and checks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify the outgoing practice when a new practice takes over patient care

    Wider context from the report

    “The practice which a patient is leaving is not notified of the new practice taking over the patients care so that doctors can speak and discuss any pertinent medical issues. ”

    Source location

    David Baddeley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Suzanne Samantha Greenwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Suzanne Samantha Greenwood died at Haslam Park, Bolton, on 23 December 2014 after being found collapsed and unresponsive with a ligature around her neck; she had also taken Zopiclone and alcohol. The principal concerns were the absence of contact after she failed to attend appointments, her not being discharged or reported to her General Practitioner, and the lack of systems and timescales for managing missed appointments and notifying other healthcare professionals.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify General Practitioners and other continuing-care professionals of missed appointments and hospital discharge status

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the Inquest evidence was heard that i. Mrs Greenwood had not been seen by ████████ at the Priory Hospital, Altrincham after her last review on the 21st November 2013 prior to her death on the 23rd December 2014. She had failed to attend appointments in January 2014 but there had been no contact with her, either by telephone or letter, following her failure to attend the appointment on the 16th January 2014. ii. Mrs Greenwood had not been discharged by ████████ following her failure to attend her appointment on the 16th January 2014 and before her death on the 23rd December 2014 but there had been no contact with her for a period exceeding 11 months. iii. ████████ had not made any contact with the General Practitioner to confirm Mrs Greenwood’s failure to attend her appointments in January 2014 and that she had not been seen after the 21st November 2013, which is a particular concern when an Advanced Nurse Practitioner reduced the medication initially prescribed by ████████ which she had the authority to reduce, in circumstances where ████████ had not seen Mrs Greenwood since the 21st November 2013. iv. There are no systems, either in ████████ private practice or in the Priory Hospital, Altrincham to contact patients following a failure to attend appointments and to consider the discharge of patients when a patient repeatedly fails to attend appointments over a period of time. There are no timescales with regard to the discharge of patients and no system to contact General Practitioners or other health professionals in relation to the failure to attend appointments, particularly in circumstances where other health professionals are likely to continue to treat patients after the missed appointments, including changes in medication. The importance of discharge within a reasonable period after a failure to attend appointments is important to enable other health professionals involved in continuing care to be aware of the non-attendance at appointments and the discharge. The fact that there has been no reported failure to attend appointments and no reported discharge would be misleading to other health professionals involved in continuing care, particularly when a patient has not been seen for a period in excess of 12 months and that information would not be available to other health professionals in the absence of information from the Hospital. There is a need for health professionals involved in the continuing care of a patient to be kept informed as to the treatment or non-treatment of the patient at a hospital when considering further treatment in the community. 2. I request you to consider the above concerns and for both ████████ and The Priory Hospital, Altrincham to carry out a review with regard to the following. i. The systems procedures, policies and protocols in relation to contact with patients who fail to attend appointments. ii. The systems, procedures, policies and protocols in relation to patients who repeatedly fail to attend appointments and to consider a final letter to the patient indicating that the patient will be discharged unless there is either contact or an appointment within a defined period. iii. The systems, procedures, policies and protocols in relation to the discharge of patients who repeatedly fail to attend appointments with notification to General Practitioners or other health professionals of the patient’s failure to attend appointments and their discharge from hospital. The review should consider timescales in relation to discharge when a patient has failed to attend appointments for a specific period of time. iv. The evidence raised concerns that there is a risk that future deaths will occur unless action is taken to review the above issues. ”

    Source location

    Suzanne Samantha Greenwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require independent doctors to send final non-attendance letters to patients and relevant professionals, including medication, aftercare, crisis actions and future assistance options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to 2 and 3 please note that we have given full consideration to these matters and have now made the following requirements explicit in Policy H105: Practising Privileges for Independent Doctors:”

    Source location

    2015-0370-Response-by-The-Priory_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 October 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require independent doctors to send discharge letters to GPs and relevant professionals after final non-attendance contact, copying patients and including medication, aftercare and crisis actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to 2 and 3 please note that we have given full consideration to these matters and have now made the following requirements explicit in Policy H105: Practising Privileges for Independent Doctors:”

    Source location

    2015-0370-Response-by-The-Priory_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 October 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require prompt telephone contact with GPs when concerns arise about non-attending patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• That the independent doctor will complete and send a discharge letter to the General Practitioner and other relevant professionals after the final contact with the patient in those instances where the patient has failed to attend appointments. The letter should give detail of the patient’s medication, the recommendations for after care and as with the first bullet point above identify possible actions to be taken by the General Practitioner should the patient experience a future crisis. The letter should be copied to the patient. Prompt telephone contact should be made with the General Practitioner in those instances where there are deeper concerns about the patient.”

    Source location

    2015-0370-Response-by-The-Priory_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 October 2015

    Open published response
  7. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Anne Wilson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anne Wilson had a history of depression, had recently been discharged from psychiatric hospital, and was found deceased in her flat after failing to attend appointments and following concerns raised to the police. The principal concerns were the downgrading of the welfare-check request without informing her GP, inadequate training and guidance under the Metropolitan Police Service welfare-check policy, and failures in communication and joint working between the Metropolitan Police Service and London Ambulance Service.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform the GP when a welfare check request is downgraded

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The MPS call handler informed Miss Wilson’s G.P that the police would attend Miss Wilson’s flat within the hour however the request for a welfare check was downgraded without informing the G.P of the change in decision or to seek further clarification of his concerns. ”

    Source location

    Anne Wilson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan

    AI-generated summary

    John Christopher Lloyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Christopher Lloyd died at UHW on 27 February 2015 following a second accidental morphine overdose. He had chronic pain after a serious foot injury and had previously been admitted after an overdose. The principal concern was that notification of his first hospital admission was not sent to his GP, and that failures in notifying GPs occurred frequently, potentially affecting continuity of treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to notify GPs of hospital admissions

    Wider context from the report

    “For Mr Adam Cairns, Chief Executive, UHW (1) The notification that should have been sent to the GP after the first admission to UHW on 29th January 2015 was not sent. I heard evidence from ████████ that this was not an isolated incident but arose quite often particularly in times of stress. (2) ████████ told me that an electronic system of notification had been introduced in mid-2014. This electronic system should therefore have been in place for Mr Lloyd but was not apparently utilised. Had this information been available to the GP then it may have caused more questions to be asked at his consultation on the 16th February 2015 and may have led to a different course of treatment and outcome. The Coroner is concerned that UHW should employ systems to ensure the notification of admission to GPs in future cases to aid with the continuity of treatment. The Coroner is particularly concerned that failures in notification of admission occur quite frequently. ”

    Source location

    John Christopher Lloyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Powys, Bridgend and Glamorgan Valleys

    AI-generated summary

    Mr. Alun Walters · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr. Alun Walters, who was prescribed Warfarin following receipt of a metallic heart valve, died after a gastro-intestinal haemorrhage in circumstances of suspected elevated Warfarin levels and failed INR monitoring. His prescriptions continued despite no INR tests after November 2013, and 51 prescriptions were provided without dosage assessment. Concerns included failures by the medical practice in monitoring, prescription systems and notifying the pharmacy that Warfarin had been withdrawn, while the pharmacy supplied Warfarin without a valid prescription.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement notification of failed attendance for INR testing

    Wider context from the report

    “The Lawn Medical Practice - (1) failed to use any computer software programmes to support its prescription decisions; (2) breached its contract with the Aneurin Bevan University Health Board in the development and maintenance of an anti-coagulation treatment register; (3) failed to put into place a system of notification to the GP and the Health Care Assistant of a patient’s failed attendance for INR testing; and (4) failed to advise the Rhymney Pharmacy Ltd. that Warfarin had been withdrawn due to a lack of INR safety testing. ”

    Source location

    Mr. Alun Walters · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Cumbria (North & West)

    AI-generated summary

    William Reid · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Reid was found deceased at his home on 24 July 2013, having lived alone and with a delay in the discovery of his death. Concerns included delayed recognition of his deteriorating condition, delayed hospital admission, and failure to inform his GP about his hospital admission and discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform the GP of hospital discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “His admission to hospital in 2013 was not known to his GP. The deceased was discharged from hospital without his GP being informed. There was a delay in the recognition of his deteriorating condition and in his subsequent admission to hospital. The risk is that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. ”

    Source location

    William Reid · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform the GP of hospital admission

    Wider context from the report

    “His admission to hospital in 2013 was not known to his GP. The deceased was discharged from hospital without his GP being informed. There was a delay in the recognition of his deteriorating condition and in his subsequent admission to hospital. The risk is that future deaths will occur unless action is taken. ”

    Source location

    William Reid · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish the Information Strategy establishing a framework for recording and securely sharing health and care information using consistent standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Governments Information Strategy “The Power of Information: Putting all of us in control of the health and care information we need” was published in May 2012. A copy can be found on the GOV.UK website via the following link: The Power of Information. The Strategy sets a ten-year framework for transforming information for health and care. It aims to harness information and new technologies to achieve higher quality care and improve outcomes for patients and service users.”

    Source location

    2014-0288-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 June 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026