Recurring concern

Inadequate thromboprophylaxis for patients at risk of venous thromboembolism

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Feb 2013•Latest report 4 Jun 2024

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of assessment, prescribing, arrangement, communication, implementation, delivery or monitoring that are specifically dedicated to preventing venous thromboembolism, including the anchor's failure to obtain and clarify discharge thromboprophylaxis requirements.

Not included

  • Excludes generic failures to obtain, transfer or document information unless they are specifically tied to a thromboprophylaxis decision or requirement.
  • Excludes unrelated medication, discharge-planning or clinical-assessment failures that do not concern venous thromboembolism prevention.
  • Excludes thrombosis outcomes or general immobility risks without an identified thromboprophylaxis control failure.
Reports
27

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
35

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2024

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
50

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care6
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence4
East Lancashire Hospitals NHS Trust2
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS England2
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust2
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust2
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust2
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Brunswick Ward at Lindridge1
Doncaster Royal Infirmary1
East and North Hertfordshire Teaching NHS Trust1
Frome Care Village1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Brenda McWilliams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Brenda McWilliams, who had Alzheimer's disease and remained immobile after discharge from hospital to a residential care home, died on 3 January 2019. A post-mortem examination found that she died from a pulmonary thromboembolism caused by a deep vein thrombosis associated with her immobility. The principal concern was that medication to minimise the risk of venous thromboembolism was not continued or prescribed after her hospital discharge despite her recognised high risk and the potentially life-threatening consequences.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess high-risk community patients for VTE prevention

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that the various medical practitioners who attended upon Mrs McWilliams did not consider continuing prescribing Mrs McWilliams medication to minimise the risk of VTE after her discharge from hospital on 21st December 2018 despite recognising that: (1) Mrs McWilliams remained at high risk of VTE and that the consequence of such an event was likely to be serious, even life threatening; (2) it had been deemed appropriate to administer medication to Mrs McWilliams by means of daily injections whilst in hospital; and (3) there were no other suitable means identified and/or adopted to minimise this risk. I understand that NICE has published the following guidance: • Guideline NG89 “VTE in over 16s: reducing the risk of hospital-acquired deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism” • Quality Standard QS29 “VTE in adults: diagnosis and management” I was told that QS29 does not include recommendations for the prevention of VTE. The evidence that I heard suggested that medical practitioners have interpreted the NICE guidance as saying that it is not necessary/appropriate to prescribe medication to minimise the VTE risk for patients who are living in the community unless they have been discharged from hospital with short term immobility (for example with their leg in a cast following a fracture). Whilst I recognise that the decision to prescribe medication is a multi-factoral clinical decision I am concerned that the evidence I heard suggests that some patients living in the community who are at high risk of VTE (who may not have been admitted to hospital whilst at high risk of VTE) are not being assessed and treated with medication to minimise the risk of VTE, which if it develops can be a life-threatening condition. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Brenda McWilliams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Joseph Arthur Charles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joseph Arthur Charles fell at home, underwent right elbow surgery, was discharged, and was later found unresponsive in bed by his wife. The concern was that national guidance existed for preventing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolus after lower-limb surgery but not after upper-limb surgery.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of recommendations or guidance for prevention of DVT and pulmonary embolus in upper limb surgery

    Wider context from the report

    “That although there are clear National guidelines for the prevention of DVT and pulmonary embolus there are no such recommendations or guidance for upper limb surgery. ”

    Source location

    Joseph Arthur Charles · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver education and awareness sessions on the VTE policy and publicise policy and guideline updates through orthopaedic governance and audit meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Review of the Trust’s Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) prevention policy It was agreed there is no need to amend or change the present guidance, which is consistent with national guidelines for lower limb surgery and specifically mentions any major surgery over 90 minutes, which would include the elbow replacement surgery which Mr. Charles had. However, there is now an opportunity to strengthen education, training and awareness of this policy is amongst the surgical team. ████████ Consultant Haematologist, is to conduct an education and awareness event at the next Orthopaedic Governance Meeting on Tuesday 1 October 2019, and in addition there will be an audit meeting to publicise the policy and guidelines updates on Tuesday 3 December 2019.”

    Source location

    2019-0277-Response-by-North-Middlesex-Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incorporate the approved VTE risk-assessment leaflet into the revised Orthopaedics Handbook.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Publishing a VTE risk assessment template/flyer in Orthopaedics Discussions are currently being held by the hospital’s Thrombosis Group regarding the publishing of a new leaflet, which is due for Trust-wide implementation by 31 January 2020. Following approval this leaflet will be incorporated into the Orthopaedics Handbook, which is due to be revised by 28 February 2020.”

    Source location

    2019-0277-Response-by-North-Middlesex-Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a thromboprophylaxis domain to the local pre-operative checklist to prompt anaesthetists to record prophylaxis on the anaesthetic drug chart.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Review of the VTE risk assessment in theatres Although appropriate risk assessments are undertaken prior to routine surgery, our investigation revealed that the required medication(VTE prophylaxis) in this case had not always been prescribed. As such, an extra domain has been added to our local pre-operative checklist to ensure that the anaesthetists will write up thromboprophylaxis on the anaesthetic drug chart during surgery. This change in process will be discussed with the Head of Anaesthetics by 31 October 2019.”

    Source location

    2019-0277-Response-by-North-Middlesex-Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss the revised pre-operative checklist process with the Head of Anaesthetics.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Review of the VTE risk assessment in theatres Although appropriate risk assessments are undertaken prior to routine surgery, our investigation revealed that the required medication(VTE prophylaxis) in this case had not always been prescribed. As such, an extra domain has been added to our local pre-operative checklist to ensure that the anaesthetists will write up thromboprophylaxis on the anaesthetic drug chart during surgery. This change in process will be discussed with the Head of Anaesthetics by 31 October 2019.”

    Source location

    2019-0277-Response-by-North-Middlesex-Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for addressing the lack of national DVT and pulmonary embolus prevention guidelines lies with the Department of Health.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We write following receipt of the Regulation 28 report issued following the conclusion of the inquest into the death of the above named. Whilst we understand that the lack of national guidelines for the prevention of DVT and pulmonary embolus following upper limb surgery is a matter for the Department of Health to address, the Trust decided to undertake a review of our local policy and procedures.”

    Source location

    2019-0277-Response-by-North-Middlesex-Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing local VTE guidance requires no amendment because it is consistent with national guidance and covers major elbow surgery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Review of the Trust’s Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) prevention policy It was agreed there is no need to amend or change the present guidance, which is consistent with national guidelines for lower limb surgery and specifically mentions any major surgery over 90 minutes, which would include the elbow replacement surgery which Mr. Charles had. However, there is now an opportunity to strengthen education, training and awareness of this policy is amongst the surgical team. ████████ Consultant Haematologist, is to conduct an education and awareness event at the next Orthopaedic Governance Meeting on Tuesday 1 October 2019, and in addition there will be an audit meeting to publicise the policy and guidelines updates on Tuesday 3 December 2019.”

    Source location

    2019-0277-Response-by-North-Middlesex-Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response
  3. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Ann Corfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ann Corfield was admitted to hospital with a urinary tract infection, low sodium levels and deteriorating mental health, later developing severe psychotic depression, poor oral intake and dehydration. She suffered a cardiac arrest and died after transfer between hospitals. Concerns included inadequate handover about anticoagulation, failure to administer prescribed prophylactic anticoagulation, poor completion of fluid balance charts, and the lack of suitably qualified staff to administer intravenous fluids at Park House.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in prescribing prophylactic anticoagulation for patients at high risk of VTE

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I heard evidence that although Mrs Corfield was at high risk of developing a VTE, following her admission to Park House on 28th June, prophylactic anticoagulation was not prescribed for her until 30th June when a prescription for clexane (enoxaparin) was issued. Further, although clexane was prescribed, it was never administered to Mrs Corfield. ”

    Source location

    Ann Corfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Christopher Hopkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Christopher Hopkins sustained a right patella fracture requiring surgery and was discharged from hospital. He later collapsed at home and died from a pulmonary thromboembolism, and the report raised a concern about information given at discharge to patients at risk of thromboembolism after surgery for trauma.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure discharge information addresses thromboembolism risk after trauma-related surgery

    Wider context from the report

    “To review current practice guidelines with respect to the information provided to patients on discharge from hospital that may be at risk of the formation of thromboembolisms given they have had recent surgery after sustaining a trauma. ”

    Source location

    Michael Christopher Hopkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review patient information provided after blood-clot risk assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Foundation Trust has been working hard to ensure that all eligible patients receive an assessment of their risk of developing blood clots, and can demonstrate consistent compliance with the relevant key performance indicators. Since the Regulation Report was received, we have reviewed the information provided to all patients (not just those who have experienced a trauma), following that assessment of risk, and as a result, the Trust has developed a revised leaflet that all patients will receive. I have attached an example of the leaflet to this letter, and confirm this leaflet will be introduced from the 1st December 2018.”

    Source location

    2018-0331-Response-by-Bradford-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 March 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a revised leaflet for patients following blood-clot risk assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Foundation Trust has been working hard to ensure that all eligible patients receive an assessment of their risk of developing blood clots, and can demonstrate consistent compliance with the relevant key performance indicators. Since the Regulation Report was received, we have reviewed the information provided to all patients (not just those who have experienced a trauma), following that assessment of risk, and as a result, the Trust has developed a revised leaflet that all patients will receive. I have attached an example of the leaflet to this letter, and confirm this leaflet will be introduced from the 1st December 2018.”

    Source location

    2018-0331-Response-by-Bradford-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 March 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce the revised leaflet for all patients from 1 December 2018.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Foundation Trust has been working hard to ensure that all eligible patients receive an assessment of their risk of developing blood clots, and can demonstrate consistent compliance with the relevant key performance indicators. Since the Regulation Report was received, we have reviewed the information provided to all patients (not just those who have experienced a trauma), following that assessment of risk, and as a result, the Trust has developed a revised leaflet that all patients will receive. I have attached an example of the leaflet to this letter, and confirm this leaflet will be introduced from the 1st December 2018.”

    Source location

    2018-0331-Response-by-Bradford-Teaching-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 March 2019

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Barbara Ryder · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Barbara Ryder underwent surgery for bladder cancer and was discharged after receiving Clexane, with reduced mobility and no further clinical review regarding Clexane. She later deteriorated, was diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism and died on 21 August 2017. The inquest raised concerns that guidance did not address whether some patients with ongoing reduced mobility might require longer treatment or emphasise review after discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance for extending clexane prophylaxis when patient mobility remains reduced

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that: The guidance nationally is to prescribe clexane for 28 days after an operation. However, the guidance does not suggest that some cases may require longer where a patients mobility remains reduced. There does not appear to be an emphasis on the need to review the situation throughout the post-operative period after a discharge home. ”

    Source location

    Mary Barbara Ryder · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NICE concluded that its VTE guidelines are appropriate and require no amendment at this time.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My officials have made enquiries with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on the matter of concern you have raised.”

    Source location

    2018-0323-Response-by-Department-of-Health-Social-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 February 2019

    Open published response
  6. Oxfordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Marian Grant · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marian Grant, aged 74, tripped and fell on 14 April 2018 and died from a pulmonary embolism during surgery for a fractured neck of femur on 16 April 2018. The principal concerns were the omission of VTE prophylaxis, particularly for patients placed on non-trauma wards, and the failure of EPR alerts and other checks to ensure that prophylaxis was prescribed and acted upon.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure staff act upon VTE prophylaxis alerts

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The second concern relates to ignoring the VTE prophylaxis alerts on EPR. I note from the RCA Report that the warning was visible on exiting the record by all staff. ████████ explained however that often the warning would not be seen because sometimes a doctor does not actually exit the record but keeps it open (albeit secure). It is surprising that from the time of transfer to the neuro-science ward from ED until the time when the patient was seen by the Consultant Anaesthetist ████████ on the morning of surgery on 16 April that the EPR was accessed 27 times by staff members and yet none of the staff interviewed recalled seeing the alert. A system designed with fail-safes in the form of alerts is obviously not effective if the alerts are not seen or routinely ignored. Recommendation 8 on the Action Plan refers to this issue and I see that an email has been sent out to the EPR Lead and that a new version of EPR will prevent staff being able to exit the EPR record until VTE alerts have been dealt with. As mentioned, it seems though that doctors do not always exit the record and, as I understand it, the alert will not pop up unless the record is being exited. It would be appreciated if you could provide some clarification on this and also address the wider issue of alerts not being acted upon. ”

    Source location

    Marian Grant · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure VTE prophylaxis for trauma patients outlying on non-trauma wards

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The first concern relates to what are referred to as ‘outlying patients’. Mrs Grant went from the emergency department to a neuro-science ward because there were no beds on a trauma ward. It appears that her placement on a ward other than a trauma ward raised issues in respect of her care and, in particular, it meant she was not being cared for by trauma nurses who might ordinarily be expected to pick up the omission concerning VTE prophylaxis. I understand it is relatively common for a trauma patient to be placed on a ward other than a trauma ward. I understand that this may be unavoidable but I am concerned about there being sufficient safeguards in place. I see from the Action Plan that recommendations 1 and 7 refer to this issue. There has been an audit and the trauma co-ordinator is to check VTE prophylaxis has been prescribed to trauma patients outlying on non-trauma wards. I seek reassurance that the audit of care for such patients confirms that the same standard of care is delivered regardless of location. I also seek information and reassurance about the practical steps taken by the trauma co-ordinator to check VTE prophylaxis. There were a number of system checks which failed in this case and it is therefore important that system checks are effective. ”

    Source location

    Marian Grant · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require doctors to address the VTE alert before exiting or navigating away from the electronic patient record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a direct result of the death of Mrs Grant and a few days prior to the Inquest, the Trust launched a new system which meant that doctors are unable to exit the EPR until the VTE alert has been dealt with (a hard pop up alert). In practice, this means that the alert confirming that prescription of VTE prophylaxis is required, cannot be overridden until the drug has actually”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit the effectiveness of the mandatory VTE electronic patient record alert system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An audit of the efficacy of this new system is due to be undertaken in January 2019. Again, I would be happy to share with you the outcome of the audit if this would be of interest to your office.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Streamline electronic alerts by moving soft alerts into the record sidebar and limiting hard pop-ups to key safety issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Recognising the importance of VTE prophylaxis and also taking into account operator “alert fatigue” the Trust are in the process of streamlining and adapting the way in which alerts are brought to the attention of clinical staff.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and deploy an electronic whiteboard displaying outstanding patient tasks and VTE prophylaxis status using traffic-light indicators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Other IT developments in the pipeline include the development and deployment of an electronic ‘white board’ for use by authorised users (for example a ward manager) and ward staff so instant access can be ascertained with regard to the relevant cohort of patients to check what outstanding tasks remain outstanding for each patient. This framework will also be deployed for individual clinician worklists as described below.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand personal electronic worklists to individual doctors and introduce nursing worklists for outstanding VTE prophylaxis tasks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The IT team are also seeking to expand upon the personal electronic work lists currently used by the pharmacists so that personal work lists can be created for each individual doctor in the Trust.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit trauma patients across the Trust to benchmark VTE prophylaxis care and identify discrepancies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To put the Trust’s response in context, and in advance of the Inquest heard on 5 September 2018, the Trust had already put in place a number of steps to address the concerns raised above. This included an audit undertaken by the Clinical and Governance Lead for Trauma at the end of August to benchmark the standard of care provided across the Trust for trauma patients. I readily acknowledge that the audit results confirmed there were discrepancies across the Trust in the management and administration of VTE prophylaxis.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review outlying trauma patients daily to verify that appropriate VTE prophylaxis is prescribed, using senior trauma nursing cover when required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further, the Clinical Nurse Specialist had already been tasked to review outlying patients on a daily basis to check that appropriate VTE prophylaxis is being prescribed to all relevant patients who are not based on the trauma wards, prior to the Inquest itself.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check daily at multidisciplinary meetings that reviews of outlying trauma patients are taking place.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the steps above, the Matron for the trauma team also checks, at the daily multi-disciplinary meetings that, the reviews described above are actually taking place. Her perception of the new systems is that it is working well.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue consultant checks that VTE assessments and prescriptions are completed for all new trauma patients, regardless of location.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Matron for the trauma department was also able to confirm that she regularly observes that the trauma team consultant surgeons also check that VTE assessments and prescriptions are being carried out on all new patients regardless of where they are based.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake the deferred follow-up audit of outlying trauma patients and publish its results to assess equality of VTE prophylaxis care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At around the time that your report was issued, the audit undertaken in August 2018 was reviewed to check that outliers were receiving VTE prophylaxis as they would on the trauma wards and a decision made to defer the next audit (which was due to be undertaken in September 2018) until December 2018. The reason that the planned follow up audit has been deferred is two-fold.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The follow-up audit was deferred because variable outlier numbers required a sufficient patient sample to produce a meaningful assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At around the time that your report was issued, the audit undertaken in August 2018 was reviewed to check that outliers were receiving VTE prophylaxis as they would on the trauma wards and a decision made to defer the next audit (which was due to be undertaken in September 2018) until December 2018. The reason that the planned follow up audit has been deferred is two-fold.”

    Source location

    Marion-Grant-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 September 2018

    Open published response
  7. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Gordon Frank Thornhill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gordon Frank Thornhill, a 61-year-old man, developed abdominal pain, attended A&E twice, and collapsed and died at home on 13 April 2017. The report identified incomplete VTE risk assessment, failure to identify that omission, undocumented consultant assessment, and a delay of more than 24 hours in providing thromboprophylaxis; the inquest conclusion was natural causes, with death from pulmonary embolism following DVT development.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in providing thromboprophylaxis exceeding 24 hours

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) A delay in excess of 24 hours in providing thromboprophylaxis. ”

    Source location

    Gordon Frank Thornhill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce the importance of prescribing VTE prophylaxis promptly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. The Trust has a system of medicines reconciliation for acute admissions on the medical assessment unit and the pharmacists are actively involved in ensuring that this process runs smoothly and also highlighting whether prophylaxis has been prescribed. On this occasion the prophylaxis was prescribed but due to human error it was prescribed to commence on the following day. The message of timely prescription has been reinforced.”

    Source location

    2017-0359-Response-by-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake a medical assessment unit quality-improvement project to improve completion and review of VTE assessments and timely prophylaxis prescribing and administration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. I am advised by the VTE Lead for the Trust that there is currently a quality improvement project being undertaken on the medical assessment unit to ensure greater compliance with the medical VTE risk assessment form and to ensure that this is reviewed on the post-take ward round and where appropriate prophylaxis is actually prescribed and given in a timely manner.”

    Source location

    2017-0359-Response-by-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Re-launch the Stop the Clot campaign through ward and education-centre posters, internal communications, and intranet messaging about VTE assessment and prophylaxis.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. Finally the Trust is in the process of re-launching the “Stop the Clot” campaign which was successful in the early years in ensuring VTE prophylaxis was appropriately undertaken and in a timely manner. This will include strategically placed posters in ward areas and the education centre as well as use of the Trust’s communication systems (Buzz, Risky Business) to highlight the importance of risk assessment and prescription of prophylaxis. The same message will be on the Intranet.”

    Source location

    2017-0359-Response-by-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response
  8. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Kenneth Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kenneth Evans was admitted to hospital after a mechanical fall and fractured pubic ramus, and subsequently developed an extensive pulmonary embolism. He died on 11 March 2017 after cardiac arrest and continued clinical deterioration. The inquest identified that thromboprophylaxis and an effective blood-clot risk assessment had not been arranged, with missed opportunities to administer heparin.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange thromboprophylaxis

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that thromboprophylaxis was not arranged and no effective risk assessment of developing blood clots was undertaken. ”

    Source location

    Kenneth Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Derek LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derek LEE died on 5 June 2016 following an admission to Brunswick Ward. The report identified numerous concerns about his care, including medication management, incomplete assessments and documentation, falls and pressure-sore prevention, delayed referrals and treatment, nutrition, mobility, and the absence of a care co-ordinator. The inquest concluded that the death was from natural causes, and the report stated that the identified failings did not change the outcome.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in completing thromboprophylaxis assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) The thromboprophylaxis assessment which should have been carried out on either the 27th or 28th April was not done until the 6th May. ”

    Source location

    Derek LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley

    AI-generated summary

    Karen Ravenscroft · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Karen Ravenscroft fell at home on 11 March 2016 and fractured her left arm and leg. She was assessed as being at high risk of venous thromboembolism but was not prescribed appropriate prophylaxis, subsequently developed a deep vein thrombosis, and died from a fatal pulmonary embolus. Concerns included the absence of thromboprophylaxis, failure to reassess VTE risk or provide mechanical prophylaxis, and limitations in electronically prescribing drugs from the Accident & Emergency Department.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to re-assess venous thromboembolism risk 24 hours after admission

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Despite Trust VTE Guidelines recommending re-assessment of VTE risk at 24 hours after admission, no further risk assessment took place nor was there application of mechanical thromboprophylaxis like Ted Stocking or Flowtron Pump. ”

    Source location

    Karen Ravenscroft · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prescribe pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for patients at high risk of venous thromboembolism without contraindications

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The initial venous thromboembolism risk assessment done during the admission as per the Trust’s VTE Guidelines stated that Mrs Ravenscroft was at high risk for VTE with no bleeding risk and no contra-indication for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. Despite that no thromboprophylaxis was prescribed. ”

    Source location

    Karen Ravenscroft · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to apply mechanical thromboprophylaxis when indicated

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Despite Trust VTE Guidelines recommending re-assessment of VTE risk at 24 hours after admission, no further risk assessment took place nor was there application of mechanical thromboprophylaxis like Ted Stocking or Flowtron Pump. ”

    Source location

    Karen Ravenscroft · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026