Recurring concern

Unreliable urgent mental health referral and assessment pathways

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 21 Nov 2013•Latest report 4 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes delayed, inconsistent, inaccessible or poorly coordinated urgent and out-of-hours referrals for specialist mental-health assessment.

Not included

  • Excludes routine non-urgent appointments and follow-up.
  • Excludes failures within a separately named crisis, liaison or home-treatment service unless the urgent referral and assessment pathway is itself deficient.
Reports
36

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
40

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
68

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care5
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust4
Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust4
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust4
NHS England3
South West London and St George'S Mental Health NHS Trust2
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust2
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Bloomfield Medical Centre1
CRG Medical Services1
Cricket Green Medical Practice1
East London NHS Foundation Trust1
General Medical Council1
Gloucestershire Health and Care NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Alan Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Alan Hughes, who had a history of anxiety and was assessed as at high risk of self-harm and suicide, died after taking codeine and morphine and stabbing himself during the night of 22–23 June 2025. The report raised concerns that urgent referrals from general practice could not be made directly to the Home Based Treatment Team in South Trafford, resulting in a delay over the weekend before assessment or onward referral could occur.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to allow direct referral from general practice to the HBTT for urgent high-risk referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “7. In evidence, it was accepted on behalf of the CMHT that there are occasions when a nurse associated with a general practice, or a general practitioner, may need to refer directly to the HBTT; but that the formal procedure does not allow for this. 8. Therefore, at the time of Mr Hughes’s death, such a referral could not be made. It still cannot be made, notwithstanding the availability of this course in other boroughs and the findings of the After Action Review. 9. Had it been possible for the nurse who assessed Mr Hughes on behalf of the general practice to refer him direct to the HBTT, the delay occasioned by the system of referral to the HBTT operated by South Trafford CMHT would have been avoided. 10. It was explained in evidence on behalf of the CMHT, that had the HBTT been able to assess Mr Hughes, it was unclear whether they would have accepted the referral. However, what the HBTT would or would not have decided is unknown: nor does this obviate the concern raised. 11. The concern is that in South Trafford, a service user cannot be referred directly to the HBTT from a general practice where: i. there is an urgent referral arising from a high risk of self-harm and / or suicide; ii. where this referral is considered necessary by the general practice professionals; and, iii. where such a referral could be made were it to take place in other boroughs within the area covered by Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust. ”

    Source location

    Mark Alan Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in assessment and referral for urgent mental health referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Whilst the usual course is for the South Trafford CMHT to make contact with the service user on the day of referral, the evidence established that on an urgent referral, the South Trafford CMHT have a timeframe of up to 5 days to arrange an assessment. 3. Moreover, with regard to a referral in the circumstances of this matter, the CMHT do not operate over the weekend. This meant that from Friday 20th June 2025 at 17:00, there could be no assessment and no referral to the HBTT, until 09:00 on Monday 23rd June 2025, at the earliest. ”

    Source location

    Mark Alan Hughes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a Practice Note clarifying that primary care mental health practitioners can directly refer patients to HBTT across all Trust boroughs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To confirm mental health practitioners based in general practice, such as PCN’s, can refer directly into HBTT in all boroughs of the Trust, following an assessment of the persons mental health.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include direct HBTT referral guidance in the Trust Patient Safety Newsletter distributed electronically to all staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This information has been shared with urgent care staff and our PCN colleagues via a Practice Note issued on 28th April 2026 and will be included in the May edition of the Trust Patient Safety Newsletter that is shared with all staff across the Trust electronically by 28th May 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold an urgent-care away day to review and confirm the HBTT SOP and reinforce referral pathways and operational expectations, including direct referrals by primary care networks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, a planned away day is scheduled to take place on 6th May 2026 lead by the clinical service managers for urgent care, during which senior operational leads will meet to review and confirm the HBTT Standard Operating Procedure (SOP). The SOP that went live in February 2026 has a list of services that can refer into HBTT and states that this is not an exhaustive list and that GMMH operate an inclusive referral process to support all GMMH internal teams. This session will be used to clearly outline referral pathways and operational expectations across all GMMH HBTT services.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise the Referral and Assessment hub SOP by the end of May 2026.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the transformation of community mental health services GMMH are implementing a Referral and Assessment hub who will triage all external referrals and direct to the most appropriate service. These hubs are already in place in some areas of the Trust; the SOP will be finalised by the end of May 2026 and there will be a Referral and Assessment hub functioning in all areas of the Trust by the end of August 2026 enabling GP’s and other professionals to have a single point of referral.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a functioning Referral and Assessment hub in every Trust area by the end of August 2026 to provide a single external referral point.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the transformation of community mental health services GMMH are implementing a Referral and Assessment hub who will triage all external referrals and direct to the most appropriate service. These hubs are already in place in some areas of the Trust; the SOP will be finalised by the end of May 2026 and there will be a Referral and Assessment hub functioning in all areas of the Trust by the end of August 2026 enabling GP’s and other professionals to have a single point of referral.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Mental health practitioners in general practice can directly refer to HBTT across all Trust boroughs after assessing the person’s mental health.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To confirm mental health practitioners based in general practice, such as PCN’s, can refer directly into HBTT in all boroughs of the Trust, following an assessment of the persons mental health.”

    Source location

    Response from GMMH
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 March 2026

    Open published response
  2. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY, who had a history of mental health issues and significant cocaine misuse, was remanded to HMP Chelmsford on 27 January 2024 after expressing an intention to end his life. He was found suspended in his cell about seven hours after arrival and died at Broomfield Hospital on 1 February 2024; the medical cause of death was hanging and the jury concluded suicide. The principal concerns included failures in mental-health care, communication and risk documentation, failure to share information about his extreme suicide risk, inadequate assessment and supervision in prison, and the accessibility of cell-window ligature points.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make urgent mental health referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “In addition to failing to share crucial and obviously relevant information regarding Mr Berry’s extreme risk of suicide provided by the CPN at Court with prison staff, the jury found that the reception nurse, in the context of the clear information known to her, failed to: (a) document his risk of self-harm and suicide in the Systm One records and (b) failed to refer Mr Berry, that day, for an urgent review by the Mental Health team. CONCERN: Such comprehensive shortcomings in performance in respect of information sharing, conduct of assessments, basic documentation and escalation/referral on to relevant colleagues indicates (a) a failure in training of a very concerning kind, alongside (b) a failure in HCRG monitoring of standards, supervision and quality assurance processes to identify and address such extensive failures in performance. ”

    Source location

    STUART CHRISTOPHER JAMES BERRY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish and staff a dedicated Early Days in Custody Nurse role to oversee reception screening, risk assessment, information sharing, escalation, supervision, and quality assurance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are focusing on strengthening the interfaces between healthcare and custodial services, retraining reception nurses, and introducing a dedicated Early Days in Custody (EDiC) Nurse role.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver targeted mental-health awareness training and support reception nurses to identify suicide, self-harm, acute distress, and appropriate ACCT observation levels.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Strengthening Mental Health Awareness and Screening at Reception Targeted 1-1 training was introduced on 27 January 2026 to enhance staff understanding of suicide and self-harm risk factors, acute mental distress, and the impact of early custody on mental wellbeing. The newly established EDiC Nurse role provides clinical leadership and quality assurance through supervision, coaching, and review of reception assessments, supporting nurses to move beyond checklist-based screening and to apply professional judgement when identifying and escalating mental health risk. This approach supports earlier identification of risk and timely referral for mental health assessment. The EDiC Nurse also supports and supervises staff in identifying the appropriate ACCT observation levels and carries out reviews of ongoing ACCT observation levels to check their appropriateness.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG
    Page 3 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review mental-health operational procedures and referral processes to clarify urgent-referral thresholds, escalation routes, and expected 24-hour response times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Improving Identification and Escalation of Urgent Mental Health Referrals The Mental Health Operational Standard Operating Procedures and referral processes are being reviewed, clarifying thresholds for urgent mental health referrals, escalation routes, and agreeing expected response times as within 24 hours. This is audited by the EDIC Nurse. This review will be completed by 30 April 2026. Reception nurses are being supported to identify and escalate urgent presentations through targeted training on assessing the risk of suicide and self-harm alongside ongoing supervision.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG
    Page 4 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reissue mandatory escalation guidance and introduce MDT agendas and case-presentation templates for changing risk or uncertainty.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the incident, we have introduced measures to support staff in consistently meeting expectations around escalation and collaborative working. We recognise that embedding these behaviours is a gradual process and requires ongoing reinforcement, supervision and oversight, which we will continue to prioritise through:”

    Source location

    2026-0015 - Response from Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response
  3. Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Stuart VIDLER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Vidler had severe depression and was receiving mental health care from Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust. After serious suicide attempts on 30 April and 7 May 2025, he was discharged from the Home Treatment Team and was not reviewed by an out-of-hours clinician on the night of 7 May after a Rapid Response Team referral was declined. He was found dead at home on 8 May 2025, and the inquest concluded that his suicide was contributed to by a failure in care. Concerns included shortcomings in patient-centred care, clinical oversight and referral processes, risk recognition, discharge decision-making, continuity of care, care coordination, and the implementation and recording of suicidality management.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited out-of-hours availability of MHT+ support for Rapid Response Team referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “(8) I heard evidence that as a result of the referral to the Rapid Response Team being declined, Mark's mental health care technically rested with the MHT+ team, which only works until 17:00. As a result, the Approved Mental Health Practitioner service (responsible for arranging MHA assessments) would have been unable to speak to the referrer. While this was not an issue in the specific circumstances of this case, I consider that it raises risks for others in the future. ”

    Source location

    Mark Stuart VIDLER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Julie Sheila Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Julie Sheila Beasley was found deceased at home on 16 March 2023 and died from multiple drug misuse involving a fatal amount of morphine and concomitant prescribed medications. She had deteriorating mental health, increasing suicidal thoughts and plans, and repeatedly requested mental health assessment and a medication review. The report identifies failures to complete required assessments and medication review, inadequate communication and record keeping, and insufficient exploration of information she sought to share about her risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide an appropriate urgent psychiatric appointment

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Following this Mrs Beasley contacted crisis mental health explaining that she had vital information that she had not shared following a visit by a psychiatric nurse at her home. Mrs Beasley was not asked what the information was. Mrs Beasley contacted the crisis team again a few days later repeating that she had not shared information and again was not asked what the information was and was not given an appointment. Mrs Beasley’s telephone contacts were noted in her medical record with no details recorded as to what the additional information Mrs Beasley wanted to share. Mrs Beasley did not receive the appropriate psychiatric assessment following her contact with the crisis team. ”

    Source location

    Julie Sheila Beasley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Route crisis-team communications and psychiatrist review requests to multidisciplinary team mailboxes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A process has also been initiated whereby communication is not sent to an individual, but will be sent to the MDT. This ensures there are no delays in communication / actions requiring attention.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 June 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide three senior leads to support the crisis team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Psychiatrist review requests are now all sent to an MDT email address rather than to individual psychiatrists, so that this may be actively, and in a timely way attended to by the MDT review. The team is now supported by three senior leads within the team.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 4 June 2025

    Open published response
  5. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Shaun Kenny HALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shaun Hall had mixed anxiety, depressive disorder and emotionally unstable personality disorder, and was found deceased on 14 December 2023 after hanging himself. A referral to the Urgent Care and Assessment Team was declined despite information about escalating factors and his statement that he would take his own life if not allowed to see his children. The identity of the person who declined the referral was unknown and no notes were made of it.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accept a referral despite available information indicating escalating suicide risk

    Wider context from the report

    “The assessment from Talking Therapies on 20 November 2023 identified current escalating factors around not being allowed to see his children, and an upcoming court case in relation to this on 14 December 2023. Indeed he stated that if he was not allowed to see his children he would take his own life. Despite all this information being available the Urgent Care and Assessment Team did not accept the referral. Of grave concern is that the identity of the person at the Urgent Care and Assessment Team who declined the referral is not known and no notes were made of the referral. ”

    Source location

    Shaun Kenny HALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop new risk management processes, including policy updates and revised risk documentation, for UCAT and crisis and community services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to several national drivers and as part of our Trust’s commitment to continuous improvement and learning from incidents, we are developing a range of new risk management processes, including policy updates, changes to risk management documentation and the commissioning of new training modules.”

    Source location

    Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enable UCAT and Talking Therapies staff to access full records for service users in their care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having further examined the circumstances surrounding Mr Hall’s death, we have understood the need for a greater level of patient records visibility between UCAT and Talking Therapies staff. We have now enabled both UCAT and Talking Therapies staff to have full visibility of all records relating to the treatment of service users in their care.”

    Source location

    Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 January 2025

    Open published response
  6. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Timothy Robert DE BOOS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Timothy Robert DE BOOS was declared deceased at his home in Ipswich on 6 February 2024 after a self-inflicted domestic fire, with the medical cause of death recorded as smoke inhalation and severe burns. The report raises concerns about the lack of available Mental Health Unit inpatient beds and about the admission process when the patient, family, and an experienced mental health professional considered voluntary admission necessary.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team review for Mental Health Unit admission

    Wider context from the report

    “2. In Tim’s case, on the 2ⁿᵈ of February 2024 Tim’s family, Tim himself, and Tim’s Mental Health Care Coordinator (a Senior Mental Health Nurse who had been supporting Tim for a year), all wished for his admission to a Mental Health Unit as a voluntary patient. It was heard in evidence that a different team (the Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team) were the ‘gatekeepers’ for admission and this team could not review Tim until the next day. When reviewed by Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team staff (who had never met Tim before), they believed his crisis had subsided and his admission was denied. In evidence Tim’s Mental Health Care Coordinator was adamant that Tim should have been hospitalised on the 2ⁿᵈ February, as both his family and Tim himself had also wished. I am therefore concerned that the views of an experienced mental health professional, a patient’s family, and the patient themselves, is deemed insufficient evidence for an admission to a Mental Health Unit as a voluntary inpatient. ”

    Source location

    Timothy Robert DE BOOS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Crisis Team remains responsible for inpatient assessments under national practice to ensure community alternatives are considered before admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Crisis Team remains the assessors for inpatient services in line with national practice. This is to ensure all opportunities for community interventions are explored because the evidence confirms this generally leads to better recovery outcomes. The community team made the referral to the Crisis Team on 2 February who then completed a visit on 3 and 4 February. The visits assessed that admission to hospital was no longer the immediate care need.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2024

    Open published response
  7. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Nigel Hutton HAMMOND · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nigel Hammond died at Addenbrooke’s Hospital on 14 March 2024, three days after falling from a window at home and sustaining serious injuries. The inquest concluded that the death was suicide while the balance of his mind was disturbed. The principal concern was that the AMHP could not directly refer Nigel to the Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team, and that this may have delayed support before his fatal fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enable AMHPs to make direct referrals to the emergency Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team

    Wider context from the report

    “7. That said, although Nigel did not meet the criteria for immediate admission, the AMHP believed Nigel was mentally very unwell, and in need of immediate support. The court heard that such support would be available within a 4-hour target time, from the emergency Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team. 8. However, the court was told that an AMHP, despite their role in the coordination of the mental health assessment and admission to hospital of a patient, were not permitted to make direct referrals to the emergency Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team. 9. The court heard that the normal route for such referrals was via the GP Surgery, or primary care Mental Health Nurse, neither of whom in Nigel’s case would have been available before 08:00 on Monday 11th March 2024. Nigel’s fall which led to his death, occurred at 06:25 that morning. 10. I am concerned, as had the AMHP in Nigel’s case been able to directly refer him to the Crisis Resolution and Home Treatment Team on the 9th March 2024, mental health professionals would have attended, and been able to provide additional support, advice and potentially additional treatment for Nigel, in all likelihood preventing his death. ”

    Source location

    Nigel Hutton HAMMOND · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and disseminate concise guidance to Suffolk AMHPs on CRHTT referral criteria and processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following receipt of the Regulation 28, NSFT and SCC have worked jointly together to develop a short and concise information guide for AMHPs on the referral criteria and process in respect of all CRHHTs in Suffolk. This guidance has been shared with all AMHPs across Suffolk and will be followed up for robust discussion via SCC’s AMHP Service Forum and with all CRHTTs within NSFT.”

    Source location

    Response from Suffolk County Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    AMHPs were able to refer directly to the CRHTT, and the NSFT 111 Service could also make such referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since the inquest into Nigel’s death, it has been established through joint meetings between senior managers from both NSFT and SCC that AMHPs are able to refer to the CRHTT but that not all AMHPs were aware of this and that the process for referral was not clear across the AMHP service. The NSFT policy/pathway information had not been shared with SCC and the AMHP service hence resulting in confusion and lack of clarity.”

    Source location

    Response from Suffolk County Council
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 October 2024

    Open published response
  8. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Bryan Andrews and Mary Andrews · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bryan and Mary Andrews died at their home on 27 November 2022 from multiple stab wounds inflicted by their adult son. The principal concern was a lack of communication between services about the relationship between his epilepsy and psychotic symptoms, resulting in treatment delays, rejected referrals and failures to share important information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify urgency in referrals involving paranoia, delusions and suicidal ideation

    Wider context from the report

    “There was a lack of communication between services about the relationship between the diagnosis of epilepsy and the psychotic symptoms experienced by the person responsible for the deaths. This led to significant time lapses in treatment and rejection of referrals, most notably: i. On 18 November 2020 an urgent referral was made to the Single Point of Access Team by his General Practitioner, concerned about his prolonged suicidal ideation. He was referred back to his General Practitioner by the Single Point of Access Team with a request that the General Practitioner refer him to access the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service. ii. On 20 November 2020 his General Practitioner referred him to the Single Point of Access Team again, requesting they liaise with the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service as per Trust guidelines. iii. Correspondence between the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service and the Single Point of Access Team revealed that whilst the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service offered work on living with chronic conditions, they did not have a programme specific to epilepsy. A referral to the Neurology Therapy Service was made and it was decided a request to the General Practitioner for the mental health nurse in the surgery to offer an assessment was appropriate. The surgery were not informed of this. iv. On 16 December 2020 the Single Point of Access Team received a referral from a consultant neurologist requesting a medication review as his anxiety levels were affecting his epilepsy treatment. It was felt at that as the General Practitioner was reviewing his medication, a review wasn’t required. This was not communicated to the consultant neurologist. v. On 29 April 2022 he called the Single Point of Access Team saying he was having a serious psychotic episode and thought he was going to kill someone. The call was treated as a crisis call during which he decided to attend the emergency department. Once there he was assessed by the Liaison Psychiatry Team. He was referred to the Home Treatment Team, but his consultant neurologist was not informed. vi. On 3 May 2022 a trial of anti-psychotic medication was discussed at a medical review. The required consultant review of whether to prescribe anti-psychotic medication with his epilepsy medication was not carried out. vii. On 4 May 2022 a referral to the Early Intervention Service was rejected as not meeting the criteria for first episode psychosis, despite clear evidence of psychosis in the assessment by the Liaison Psychiatry Team on 29 April 2022 and in subsequent contacts with the Home Treatment Team. viii. On 5 May 2022 a first referral was made to the Emotional Wellbeing Service via email asking for their input into his care. The email was sent to an address not manned daily. When a response was provided it was unclear whether a new treatment episode had been opened. ix. On 09 May 2022 he was discharged from the Home Treatment Team. The discharge was reliant on Emotional Wellbeing Service intervention and a follow up from his General Practitioner. A discharge summary was not sent to his General Practitioner. x. On 4 October 2022 a referral was sent to the Single Point of Access Team by his General Practitioner that he was presenting as paranoid and delusional with suicidal ideation. A screen for urgency found this was a routine referral. The referral was triaged on 22 November 2022 when he was invited to contact the Single Point of Access Team for a further discussion. ”

    Source location

    Bryan Andrews and Mary Andrews · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No further action is proposed for Single Point of Access referrals because that service no longer operates and referrals now enter individual services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Single Point of Access Service within SHSC is no longer in operation, following a transformation programme of our Urgent and Crisis Services. We have, therefore, not set out any actions in this response relating to how this service deals with referrals, given that referrals now go into each individual service. We are committed to taking the following actions:”

    Source location

    Response from Sheffield Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response
  9. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Judith Maike OBHOLZER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Obholzer died by suicide on 12 July 2023 after jumping in front of a moving train, following a significant period of worsening depression and anxiety. Concerns included delays in NHS mental-health assessment and waiting-list placement, unclear routes for private practitioners to obtain NHS crisis support, difficulties contacting her GP, and the absence of shared medical notes between private and NHS providers.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear urgent and crisis referral pathways from private practitioners to NHS services

    Wider context from the report

    “2. In the course of the evidence the private consultant psychiatrist gave evidence that he was unable to refer patients directly to NHS provided crisis teams as a direct alternative to informal treatment at a private hospital. The evidence from the South West London and St George’s Mental Health Trust was that direct referrals can be made although the evidence on the exact mechanism was unclear. In Mrs Obholzer’s case, the (apparent) lack of ability of the private consultant psychiatrist to directly refer to the crisis team meant that she did not receive the community crisis support alternative to hospital admission that she required. Consideration should be given to ensuring that the pathway for urgent/crisis referrals from private practitioners to the NHS are clear to all (both for this area and throughout the country) and, if it is not already the case, to ensuring a process that allows private practitioners to arrange crisis support through the NHS directly. ”

    Source location

    Judith Maike OBHOLZER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a ratified Private Providers Shared Care Policy defining Trust and private-provider roles and responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, in addition to the DH guidance, the Trust has a ‘Private Providers Shared Care Policy’ (Appendix 1) which was ratified in January 2024. This clearly sets out the respective roles and responsibilities of the Trust and private providers. This policy was drafted with input from Consultant Psychiatrists from a private provider and supplements the DH guidance to add specific clarity for the Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make the Private Providers Shared Care Policy accessible on the Trust website and communicate its existence internally and through local GP networks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust accepts that this policy was not referenced and it appears there was a lack of appreciation that the policy existed during the Inquest. In response to the concern raised in the PFDR, the Trust will ensure this policy is made accessible on the Trust's website (in the GPs/Professionals section of our website) and its existence will be further communicated internally and also through our local GP networks.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve and publish prominent website information directing healthcare professionals to urgent mental-health crisis referrals, including the 24/7 crisis line.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the PFDR, the Trust has reviewed and further improved the information available for all healthcare professionals on the Trust website to ensure it is more easily accessible. The link (button) on the front page of the website is now red to make it even more prominent and marked ‘Urgent Help’ (Home - Website (swlstg.nhs.uk)).”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share crisis-referral information externally through social media, website news articles, and campaign materials.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, we have again shared our crisis information externally, which we do at regular intervals. This includes on social media and in extra places on our website including news articles and in information about our campaigns.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff about the Urgent Care Pathway, checking private treatment and consent, and the Private Providers Shared Care Policy through a Monthly Learning Bulletin and local GP networks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust will remind all staff of the ‘Urgent Care Pathway’ in a Monthly Learning Bulletin article (to be published by October 2024). Staff will also be reminded to regularly check if service users are receiving private treatment and discuss consent to share information. Staff will also be signposted to the Trust’s ‘Private Providers Shared Care Policy’, so they are aware of the process if they are contacted by a private provider regarding a patient in crisis. This policy will also be shared through our local GP networks.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the interface between NHS and non-NHS-funded independent health providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Work is also in progress to review the interface between the NHS and non-NHS funded independent health providers. This work is in its infancy, but NHS England can provide an update to the Coroner in due course if this would assist. We understand that the Care Quality Commission (CQC) are also undertaking work regarding standards for online care and are exploring opportunities for better sharing of information both into private sector providers and receiving information back to the patient’s registered GP practice from private providers.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand urgent and emergency mental health care and access to crisis services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of its Long Term Plan commitments to improve mental health care, NHS England has increased investment in adult and older adult community mental health services by £1 billion per year since 2019/20. Commitments in the plan have also included a significant expansion of urgent and emergency mental health care and access to crisis services.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No national or local system provides contact details for every private provider, so referral information cannot feasibly reach all providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Unfortunately, there is currently no national or local system which enables the Trust to have the contact details of every private provider operating in its catchment area and, therefore, it is not feasible to provide information about the referral process to all these providers and those we are not aware exists. Furthermore, in Mrs Obholzer’s case, the private provider that gave evidence at the Inquest and who assessed Mrs Obholzer shortly before her death, was not based in the catchment for our Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Private providers can refer patients directly to crisis services through the Mental Health Crisis Line, 111, 999 or A&E.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, the Trust would like to assure the Coroner that private providers can refer their patients to the Trust’s crisis services when required. Private providers can telephone or make a referral about someone they are concerned for to our crisis services via the Trust’s Mental Health Crisis Line in the same way as a GP or other non-Trust health professional. If a private provider contacts the Mental Health Crisis Line, advice will be provided, and their patient will be directed into the correct care pathway dependent upon the patient’s presentation and risk factors. In an emergency scenario, private providers can also call 999 or 111 and patients are able to attend A&E to access the pathway for crisis services.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    National review of psychiatric referral pathways is considered a matter for the Department of Health and NHS England.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust notes the Coroner’s desire that this aspect of the PFDR is reviewed from a national perspective and considers that the DH and NHSE will be able to address this within their response.”

    Source location

    Response from SW London Mental Health Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The relevant NHS mental health trust is responsible for providing further information about its emergency referral signposting for private providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England has also engaged with South West London and St George’s Mental Health NHS Trust. They have advised us that at the time Judith required NHS crisis support, their website provided clear signposting for private providers needing to make an emergency mental health referral. Since receiving your Report, we also note that they have made this more visually prominent on the website. I will refer you to the Trust for further information, who I understand are issuing their own response to you.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 July 2024

    Open published response
  10. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Ellen Ocean WOOLNOUGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ellen Ocean WOOLNOUGH was found suspended by a ligature at her home on 20 July 2022 after concerns had arisen about her physical and mental health. Resuscitation restored circulation, but she suffered an irreversible hypoxic brain injury and died in hospital on 28 July 2022. The principal concerns relate to mental health service discharge decisions after failed engagement, the response to urgent referrals including risk assessment and safety planning, the implementation of the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework, and the preservation of call recordings and other evidence.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate risk assessment in response to urgent referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The adequacy of NSFT’s Crisis Rehabilitation Home Treatment Team (CRHTT) response to an urgent referral, in particular; risk assessment, safety planning and decision making concerning the downgrading of referrals. ”

    Source location

    Ellen Ocean WOOLNOUGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Policy through governance, publish it, and progress its implementation plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has recently been reviewing and updating their Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Policy. This Policy is currently progressing through Trust internal governance processes and is due to be published end of June 2024, with a Policy implementation plan to be progressed during July/August 2024. This will provide additional support to staff clinical risk assessment practice.”

    Source location

    Response from Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026