Recurring concern

Failure to communicate clinically significant medication risks to patients

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 Jul 2014•Latest report 2 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to provide, explain, tailor, document or reinforce clinically significant medication-risk information to patients or their families or carers, including serious psychiatric, overdose, bleeding, toxicity or other medication-related risks where communication is needed for safe use.

Not included

  • Excludes prescriber-only medication guidance, formularies and clinical decision support where patients are not the intended recipients.
  • Excludes medication packaging or product-labelling warnings as a standalone deficiency; those belong to the dedicated product or medication-packaging warning concerns.
  • Excludes failures of prescribing, dispensing, administration, monitoring or treatment where patient-facing medication-risk communication is not the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes generic communication or health-literacy deficiencies without a clinically significant medication-risk context.
Reports
19

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
21

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
40

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB2
Department of Health and Social Care2
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency2
NHS Devon Integrated Care Board2
NHS England2
Bayer plc1
Care Quality Commission1
Clinical Commissioning Group (Devon)1
Devon Partnership NHS Trust1
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Farnham Park Health Group1
General Medical Council1
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Informa Healthcare1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Sunderland

    AI-generated summary

    Avery Jake Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Avery Jake Hall died at Sunderland Royal Hospital on 13 November 2024, aged four days, after developing global hypoxia and diffuse alveolar damage following his birth. The report was concerned that his mother continued taking Candesartan during pregnancy because she was not given clear and definitive advice to stop it, and that the medication remained available on repeat prescription without warnings identifying her pregnancy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of advice about medication risks when considering having a child

    Wider context from the report

    “Avery’s mother suffered from migraines which were increasing in severity, so she sought advice from her GP when aged 21 years old. She was prescribed Candesartan 4mg by her GP shortly before her 22nd birthday. This was to be taken daily and was placed on a repeat prescription of 28 tablets. The dose was increased to 8mg after 3 months and following a referral, the treatment was endorsed by a Consultant Neurologist at a consultation 4 months after the initial prescription. The evidence revealed that no advice was provided as to the risks of this medication should she be considering having a child. ”

    Source location

    Avery Jake Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide specific advice to stop Candesartan and identify its pregnancy risk

    Wider context from the report

    “Following a positive pregnancy test in April 2024, Avery’s mother sought advice from her GP about which of her prescribed medications were safe to use during pregnancy. During the telephone consultation with her GP on 11th April 2024 she was given specific advice to avoid using 3 of 6 prescriptions. I am concerned that the evidence highlighted that Avery’s mother was given only generic advice that it was best to avoid all medication during pregnancy but was not given specific advice to stop using Candesartan, and the risk of continuing to take this medication in pregnancy was not identified during this consultation. ”

    Source location

    Avery Jake Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide additional medication safety advice during antenatal care

    Wider context from the report

    “Although Avery’s mother had a number of attendances with clinicians throughout her antenatal care, the evidence revealed that she was given no additional advice regarding the safety of her medication and, whilst she was advised to seek advice from her GP as the prescriber, she did not feel it was necessary to do so having already had such a consultation in April 2024. ”

    Source location

    Avery Jake Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and apply an SOP covering pregnancy-related safety checks for new medicines, including stopping or replacing medicines unsafe in pregnancy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. An SOP has been implemented in relation to prescribing medication to women of child bearing age (15-55 years old). I attach the SOP. A clinical practice meeting has been arranged for 26 February 2026 at which the SOP will be discussed and laminated copies distributed.”

    Source location

    Response from Riverview Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Warn women taking Candesartan or other ARB medicines about pregnancy risks and the need to stop immediately if pregnancy occurs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Opportunistically all women taking Candesartan or any ARB of childbearing age are verbally warned as to the medication dangers and are advised to stop immediately if they become pregnant.”

    Source location

    Response from Riverview Surgery
    Page 5 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a mandatory prescribing assessment within GP specialty training that assesses prescribing for pregnancy and other special groups.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To give context to the family, The Royal College of General Practitioners works to improve patient care by encouraging the highest possible standards in general medical practice by supporting members, setting standards, providing education and training, promoting research and advocating and representing the College and its 56,000 members.”

    Source location

    Response from the Royal College of General Practitioners
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide pregnancy-prescribing information resources and links through the RCGP Women’s Health toolkit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the RCGP Womens Health toolkit, the breadth of information resources on prescribing in pregnancy are provided with links, including the Specialist Pharmacy Service, (SPS) https://www.sps.nhs.uk/articles/the-risks-and-principles-of-prescribing-in-pregnancy/”

    Source location

    Response from the Royal College of General Practitioners
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use reception tasks to trigger pregnancy coding, midwife referral checks and medication reviews, with duty-GP cover when unavailable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Any patient who advises that they have become pregnant will be alerted to myself via a task from reception so that I can; a. Code that they are currently pregnant, b. Request referral to our Community Midwife and c. Conduct a medication review. If I am unavailable the task will be sent to the on/call GP, all clinicians have been briefed as to the dangers of Candesartan.”

    Source location

    Response from Riverview Surgery
    Page 5 · response
    Published 2 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

    AI-generated summary

    Fallon Leanne ADAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Fallon Leanne Adams was found unresponsive and cold in her cell at HMP Peterborough on 9 February 2023 and was declared deceased after CPR and a negative heart trace. The inquest concluded that she died from intoxication by mixed drugs, with illicitly obtained medication having a high probability of causing her death. Concerns included the combined sedative effects of prescribed and non-prescribed medication, a lack of specific warnings about over-sedation and death, and inadequate welfare checks and observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide and implement specific warnings about the risks of over-sedation from additional non-prescribed medication

    Wider context from the report

    “• Whilst an inmate at HMP Peterborough Fallon ADAMS was prescribed methadone (for opiate withdrawal) and chlordiazepoxide (for alcohol withdrawal). She also took non-prescribed ████████ apparently obtained from an illicit source within the prison. All of these medications have a sedative effect which in combination have the potential to cause over sedation and death. • The evidence seemed to show that at no stage was Ms ADAMS given a specific warning or advice stating that taking additional non-prescribed medication ████████ could result in over sedation and death. • I also heard evidence in relation to Regulation 28 issues. Whilst it is clear that a number of relevant changes were being made it was not clear that a specific warning in relation to the risks of over sedation was being implemented. ”

    Source location

    Fallon Leanne ADAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind secure-environment prescribers to discuss medication purposes, risks, interactions, follow-up, and document contemporaneous consultation advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We agree it is important that a patient is informed about the risk(s) of any medication(s) our clinicians prescribe, including those that may arise from interactions with other medications they may be taking, whatever the source.”

    Source location

    Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce and routinely provide patients with a harm-minimisation leaflet covering polypharmacy, illicit substances, substance use alone, reduced tolerance, and medication initiation or titration risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have also introduced a new harm minimisation advice leaflet, which is now routinely provided to patients. This leaflet clearly outlines key risks, including polypharmacy, the use of illicit drugs alongside prescribed medication, the dangers of using substances alone in cells (particularly overnight), reduced tolerance following periods of abstinence, and the increased risk associated with medication initiation and titration periods.”

    Source location

    Response from Northamptonshire Healthcare Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 January 2026

    Open published response
  3. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Jacob Matthew WOODERSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jacob Wooderson, who was being treated with Elvanse for ADHD, increased his dosage to 70 mg in August 2024 and subsequently experienced poor sleep and exhaustion before collapsing and dying at home on 23 August 2024. The inquest recorded sudden arrhythmic death syndrome, with Elvanse treatment for ADHD as a contributing factor, although the precise cause of the arrhythmia could not be established. Concerns included inadequate monitoring and documentation of heart rate, blood pressure and medication advice, particularly following dosage increases and during remote consultations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure patients retain advice about Elvanse adverse side effects

    Wider context from the report

    “2) Symptoms of ADHD can include forgetfulness and problems with inattention. Consequently, there is a risk that patients may not recall verbal advice regarding the adverse side effects of Elvanse, particularly if it is only given at the outset of treatment or is not followed up in writing. ”

    Source location

    Jacob Matthew WOODERSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss case-related prescribing issues at the College webinar on common and complex prescribing scheduled for 12 November 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We will discuss the aspects raised in this case at a RCPsych webinar on “Common prescribing errors and complex prescribing” planned for 12.11.2025. The last edition of this event was attended by more that 1500 psychiatrists in 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal College of Psychiatrists
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 August 2025

    Open published response
  4. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    William Antony Northcott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Antony Northcott, who had treatment-resistant schizophrenia, was found deceased on 13 July 2021 after suffering a sudden fatal cardiac arrhythmia. The report raised concerns about the adequacy and consistency of information on clozapine side effects and cardiac warning signs, the detection of cardiomyopathies in patients taking clozapine, and communication between agencies and care teams.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited provision of Clozapine side-effect and red-flag information to patients attending GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Currently around 60% of the cohort of patients prescribed Clozapine who are under the care of Devon Partnership Trust have access to these clinics. The other 40% will attend their GP surgery for their monthly Clozapine phlebotomy service. The phlebotomy service provided at a GP practice is usually an appointment with a non-qualified member of staff, who will not have been specifically trained in the side effects of Clozapine. I am therefore concerned that the level of care provided to patients attending Clozapine clinics on a monthly basis, is likely to be superior to the care provided to those patients who attend their GP practice. In particular, I am concerned that any discussion and repetition of information surrounding red flags and side effects associated with Clozapine, and advice about when to seek medical attention, will be significantly more limited for those patients attending their GP practice than for those attending the monthly Clozapine clinics. I am also concerned that this limitation is likely to extend further than the 40% of patients in receipt of Clozapine under the care of Devon Partnership NHS Trust and that this may be a national issue. ”

    Source location

    William Antony Northcott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish specialist Clozapine clinics providing monthly side-effect screening and patient discussions during phlebotomy appointments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(1) The inquest heard evidence that there should be regular repetition of information to patients suffering from treatment resistant schizophrenia about the risks and red flags associated with the side effects of taking Clozapine. Since William's death Devon Partnership NHS Trust has set up Clozapine clinics which provide the opportunity for staff who are familiar with the side effects associated with Clozapine to discuss these with patients attending for their monthly phlebotomy appointments (required for the purpose of monitoring their white blood cell count).”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a business case to increase resources for dedicated specialist Clozapine clinics across Devon.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a Trust we have developed a business case in order for the organisation to increase resources and to bring all the patients receiving Clozapine onto dedicated Specialist Clozapine clinics across Devon in Barnstaple, Exeter and Torquay (excluding Plymouth where Livewell provide mental health services) to receive the Gold Standard in Physical health monitoring and side effects screening.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bring patients receiving Clozapine under Trust care onto dedicated specialist clinics across Devon, excluding Plymouth.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are around 230 patient that attend the DPT lead specialised Clozapine clinics where physical monitoring and side effects screening occurs in accordance to the regularity of when blood test is required. This varies between weekly, two weekly or every 4 weeks. However, the 40% that accounts for 160 patients that attend GP surgeries where the side effect monitoring and screening does not occur. For this group we will be implementing the following”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review clozapine product information and consider improving its clarity for healthcare professionals, patients, families and carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MHRA continuously reviews the safety of medicines on the UK market and take appropriate regulatory action as required. Currently, the MHRA is reviewing the product information for clozapine. As part of this review, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved to provide greater clarity. We intend to engage with relevant stakeholders during this process to ensure the regulatory documents meet the needs of patients and prescribers. It is anticipated that this review of clozapine will be completed this year.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines and Healthcare Projects Regulation Authority
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Engage relevant stakeholders during the clozapine product-information review to ensure regulatory documents meet patients’ and prescribers’ needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The MHRA continuously reviews the safety of medicines on the UK market and take appropriate regulatory action as required. Currently, the MHRA is reviewing the product information for clozapine. As part of this review, we will be giving careful consideration to the information which is provided to healthcare professionals, patients and their families and carers, and whether this can be improved to provide greater clarity. We intend to engage with relevant stakeholders during this process to ensure the regulatory documents meet the needs of patients and prescribers. It is anticipated that this review of clozapine will be completed this year.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines and Healthcare Projects Regulation Authority
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Withdraw from the agreement to provide clozapine phlebotomy services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We share the concerns of the Coroner in that patients attending Clozapine clinics could receive a higher standard of care than those attending their GP practices. For this reason, the Practice has withdrawn from the agreement with DPT to provide phlebotomy services (see letter dated 27/3/24). As stated in our previous correspondence, we had concerns that the psychiatric oversight provided by Devon Partnership NHS Trust for this cohort of patients fell below the service standard we would consider safe. We had concerns regarding the number of agencies involved in the monitoring and prescribing of clozapine, without sufficient responsibility being taken by one team. Clozapine clinics can give continuity of care for these patients and ensure that regular education and appropriate checks are undertaken.”

    Source location

    Response from The Pembroke Medical Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cascade additional funding to support more Clozapine clinics and increase access to specially trained professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: In the 2025/26 financial year, NHS Devon will be cascading additional funding to Devon Partnership NHS Trust to support the implementation of more Clozapine clinics. This will increase capacity and allow more patients to receive their care from specially trained professionals. The clinics provide vital opportunities to reinforce education around Clozapine side effects and risks, including red flags and when to seek urgent medical attention. We believe this will reduce variability in patient care and improve overall safety for individuals receiving Clozapine.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon ICB
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Yemisi Cielto-Opaleye · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Yemisi Cielto-Opaleye, a psychiatric inpatient at St Pancras Hospital, died on 13 December 2023 after receiving an Olanzapine depot injection and developing Olanzapine toxicity. The report identified concerns about inadequate pre- and post-injection vital-sign monitoring, unclear staff responsibilities, insufficient escalation and contingency planning, and failures to obtain required approval and provide adequate information about risks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate the risk of death from Olanzapine depot injections to patients or their representatives

    Wider context from the report

    “I am concerned that: (a) The risk of death from the use of Olanzapine depot injection needs to be made clear to patients who are going to be given that injection. Although it is very small risk, the fact that the risk can be largely eradicated by vital signs checks at intervals within the 3-hour period every medical intervention, the risk needs to be stated to, and understood by, patients or those who represent their interests, before such a depot injection is given; ”

    Source location

    Yemisi Cielto-Opaleye · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the olanzapine depot policy to explicitly highlight the small risk of death from post-injection syndrome.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge that the small risk of death from post injection syndrome is not explicitly highlighted within this literature and this will be reviewed within the policy.”

    Source location

    Response from North London NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 November 2024

    Open published response
  6. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Teresa Ann Bennett · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Teresa Ann Bennett, who had significant comorbidities and was taking multiple medications including Fentanyl, was found deceased at home on 1 December 2021. The inquest recorded multi-organ failure due to fatty liver and combined drug toxicity, with toxicological analysis identifying Fentanyl in the toxic and fatal range. Concerns included missed regular medication reviews, the absence of a standardised review process, and the risk of inadvertent overdose when medicines that depress the central nervous system are prescribed without regular reviews or specific advice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to issue patients specific advice about associated medication risks

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The risk of inadvertent overdose in individuals like Ms Bennett, where medication that can cause e.g drowsiness and fatigue, is prescribed alongside strong opiates and other drugs that have the ability to depress the central nervous system when such medicines are prescribed without regular reviews nor specific advice in respect of the associated risks issued to patients e.g in Ms Bennett’s case, she was instructed to simply “remove old patch and apply new patch every 72 hours” ”

    Source location

    Teresa Ann Bennett · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide medication-risk warnings on pharmacy labels and patient information leaflets with advice for relevant opioid and patch-related scenarios.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Addressing the concerns regards patient information and their awareness of risks, additional warnings are included on pharmacy labels on the outside of medication boxes, which reference the risks of drowsiness. In addition, patient information leaflets are included in every box which outlines what to do in various scenarios e.g., increased drowsiness, if patches no longer giving pain relief, and if a patch falls off.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add the Faculty of Pain Medicine opioid leaflet to the clinical system and provide it to patients at opioid reviews, initiation, or dose changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Health Board Managed Practices will, from 01 May 2024, add the Faculty of Pain Medicine opioid leaflet onto the clinical system. This will be printed and given to patients on opioids at their medication review, or when opioids are started or doses changed. A copy of this leaflet is attached as an appendix.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 February 2024

    Open published response
  7. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Georgia Dehaney-Perkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Georgia Dehaney-Perkins was found deceased on 6 September 2022 on Latton Common, Harlow, after a history of mental health difficulties, self-harm and suicidal ideation. The medical cause of death was recorded as combined alcohol and drug toxicity. Concerns included the suitability and safety of her ward bathroom, incomplete risk assessment and incident recording, insufficient documentation and communication about medication and alcohol risks, and a lack of action after family raised concerns about her leaving home with medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to discuss alcohol and medication interaction risks

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Medication was appropriately withheld on 28 August when Ms Dehaney-Perkins returned to the ward intoxicated due to potential interaction with alcohol that can cause increased sedation, (3) arrhythmia and fatality. a. This risk of consuming alcohol with her specific medication was not discussed with the Ms Dehaney-Perkins or family. b. Not all incidents of consumption of alcohol on return from leave were recorded and risk assessments were not updated. c. Ms Dehaney-Perkins had agreed to mitigations of medication management by her family that were not recorded on the care plan on discharge on 2 September. Ms Dehaney-Perkins demanded control of her medication on 4 September against concerns of her family who were forced to return medication. ”

    Source location

    Georgia Dehaney-Perkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Refer patients at high risk of alcohol misuse to drug and alcohol services and document discussions of alcohol-related medication risks with patients and, where consented, families.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: If a patient is identified as at high risk of alcohol misuse they are referred to the Drug and alcohol service. It is also discussed with the patient advising them of the risks of using alcohol whilst on medication. Where consent is given family are invited to ward reviews and discharge planning meetings and discussion around medication, risks and compliance is part of those meetings. This is documented in the patients’ notes.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response
  8. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Olivia Amy RUSSELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Olivia Russell had a history of anxiety, started citalopram in November 2020, stopped taking it without consulting a GP around June 2021, and restarted it in August 2021 after a relapse. She took her own life on 19 September 2021. Concerns included a lack of recorded evidence that risks associated with stopping medication or initially feeling worse had been discussed, uncertainty about consistent adherence to relevant guidance, and delay in carrying out a significant event review after her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely discuss medication relapse and worsening risks with patients

    Wider context from the report

    “During the inquiry, evidence was heard from ████████, one of your salaried GPs as to his interactions with Olivia, and based on the records, his colleagues’ interactions. There was no evidence within the notes that the risk of relapse if a medication is stopped was discussed in either November 2020 or August 2021, nor is there evidence that Olivia was told she may feel worse before she feels better. I did not find that this advice was not given, simply that I could not say either way. When asked, ████████ evidence was that you would discuss the risks when prescribing the drug, but was not entirely clear as to which risks he would discuss, and gave evidence that it is likely each GP has a different approach, bearing in mind the time limitations of the appointment. He could not say with confidence that every GP within the practice was discussing these key risks. A copy of the relevant NICE guidance was provided to me which states that these risks should be discussed with the patient, and I look specifically at sections 1.3.1 and 1.5.2 as a minimum. I am concerned that this guidance is not being followed as a matter of routine within the surgery and that this gives rise to a risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Olivia Amy RUSSELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recirculate NICE antidepressant guidance and GMC prescribing guidance to clinicians, highlighting discussion of medication risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. To ensure relevant information is shared with a patient when commencing an antidepressant, in accordance with relevant clinical guidelines. This includes a discussion about risks, in particular the risk of relapse when stopping a medication and the risk of increased self-harm ideation at the outset of treatment.”

    Source location

    Response from Stretton Branch Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a medication-label warning advising patients not to stop antidepressant or anti-anxiety medication without medical advice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have implemented a system whereby whenever an antidepressant or an anti-anxiety medication is prescribed a note will be added to patient and pharmacist to confirm “please do not stop these medications without medical advice”. This note will show up on the medication box label.”

    Source location

    Response from Stretton Branch Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind GPs to discuss antidepressant risks and arrange follow-up, incorporating the requirement into new-starter and locum induction materials.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reminded all GPs that at the time of commencing an antidepressant, they should have a conversation with the patient mindful of the relevant clinical guidelines. The GP is then to book a follow up review with the patient. We have included this reminder in new starters and locum induction pack to ensure they act accordingly.”

    Source location

    Response from Stretton Branch Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide 20-minute appointments for patients booking to discuss mental health concerns so medication risks can be discussed adequately.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure risks are discussed with patients on anti-depressant medication, the Practice recognises that appointment times would need to be extended beyond the usual 10-minute slot. Hence patients booking to discuss a mental health concern will be given a 20-minute appointment. However, if a patient has not declared at the time of making the appointment that the appointment is to discuss a mental health concern, then the GP can send a message to reception to say that the consultation will take another 10 minutes and to keep any waiting patients informed of any delays. It is standard practice for our reception team to ask a patient the reason for their appointment at the time of booking an appointment to assist with planning the patient journey. There is no obligation on the patient to share information. While most patients declare their reasons for appointment some say it is “private”.”

    Source location

    Response from Stretton Branch Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 December 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cascade Significant Event Analysis outcomes to clinical, reception and administration staff to support appropriate appointment booking and patient communication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have cascaded the outcomes of the Significant Event Analysis to all clinical members of our Practice team, which includes the reception and administration teams to ensure that they book the appropriate duration for each appointment and to reassure patients awaiting a consultation that they will be seen.”

    Source location

    Response from Stretton Branch Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 December 2023

    Open published response
  9. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Kirsty Clare TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kirsty Clare TAYLOR, aged 33, was found dead in the garage at her family home on 25 June 2022 after taking her own life by hanging in the early hours. The report identified concerns about fragmented mental and physical health services, insufficiently developed personality disorder provision, inadequate communication with and listening to families, and insufficient information and support for families of patients with neurodiversity.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide advice on possible medication withdrawal symptoms

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Finally, I am concerned that more needs to be done to inform and assist families, particularly in cases of patients with neurodiversity. In this particular case, the evidence found, for example, that the family were never briefed on what EUPD and ADHD really meant or on the difficulties which could present as a result of their daughter’s joint diagnoses. Being unaware as to what they were to expect, they were consequently often at a loss to know how to interact with or to help her. Neither they nor their daughter received advice on possible medication withdrawal symptoms. ”

    Source location

    Kirsty Clare TAYLOR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. North East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    KEITH RUPERT DIMOND · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith Dimond died on 24 November 2021 at Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Hospital following a catastrophic bleed from a ruptured iliac artery aneurysm, with anticoagulation contributing to the excessive bleeding. Concerns included communication failures about the known iliac artery aneurysm, lack of information about bleeding risks when anticoagulation was prescribed, delayed escalation when he deteriorated, and haematology advice on anticoagulation not being followed on two occasions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide written and family-shared bleeding-risk advice for direct oral anticoagulant medication

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The patient was discharged on 19 October 2022 with a new diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation and prescription of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Apixaban was prescribed. The patient was not given any written advice on the risks as to bleeding on this medication and the risks were not shared with family on discharge. This led to advice being sought from 111 and a long delay before 999 was called when the patient deteriorated on 22 October 2022. ”

    Source location

    KEITH RUPERT DIMOND · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and implement a generic anticoagulant discharge leaflet covering bleeding risks, warning signs and when to seek medical attention.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I can confirm that the Trust is in the process of creating and implementing a generic anticoagulant patient leaflet, which will be provided to patients upon discharge from hospital. The leaflet will cover information around risks of bleeding, signs and symptoms to look for in terms of bleeding and when to seek medical attention. The leaflet is due to be finalised by the end of March 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from East Kent Hospitals University
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 October 2022

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026