Recurring concern

Unreliable communication of patient-care information between clinical staff

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 21 Aug 2013•Latest report 27 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to communicate relevant patient care, treatment or risk information between clinical staff responsible for the same patient's care.

Not included

  • Formal handover processes where handover itself is the more specific unsafe control
  • Communication between separate organisations or agencies governed by a named information-sharing process
  • Documentation failures where relevant information was otherwise reliably communicated
  • Failure to act after information was reliably communicated
Reports
124

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
133

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
193

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care17
NHS England13
Care Quality Commission7
Barts Health NHS Trust4
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust4
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust4
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust3
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust3
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust3
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence3
Royal London Hospital3
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust3
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust2
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    DAVID WAYNE BENNETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Wayne Bennett died by hanging on 13 June 2023 after being found suspended by a ligature, with cocaine and alcohol ingestion. He had a history of drug-induced psychosis and had sought help for deteriorating mental health, psychosis and lack of sleep before his death. Concerns included inadequate sharing and recording of mental-health and primary-care information, unclear urgent-care pathways, failures to escalate requests for urgent medication review, and insufficient mental-health assessment and liaison at hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share all available information with the acute Trust nurse

    Wider context from the report

    “(6) Mr Bennett attended the acute hospital Trust for his deteriorating mental health. The acute Trust hospital nurse sought advice from the mental health liaison nurse. The acute Trust nurse did not have access to the mental health or GP records and not all available information was shared with the acute Trust nurse. ”

    Source location

    DAVID WAYNE BENNETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and expand the Shared Care Record to provide unified access to patient information across partner services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Access to medical records- Shared Care Record We have several projects under development to improve the sharing of patient information between us, primary care, social care, and NHS colleagues.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate Shared Care Record notifications, guidance and videos to emergency department clinical staff during rollout.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Notification, training guidance and videos about the Shared Care Record are currently being disseminated to our ED clinical staff as part of the rollout programme. Once the Shared Care Record is embedded, our clinical colleagues will have access to patient records from other agencies themselves, via ACP, enabling them to have a fuller picture of the patient’s clinical background. Staff will have the potential to be alerted to previous mental health interactions or concerns outside of the acute setting, without relying on the patient’s own disclosure. The types of records currently available are set out in the graphic below.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the NOVA unified electronic patient record across acute, community and mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Unified Electronic Patient Record- NOVA The Nova programme is our long-term plan working to implement a unified electronic patient record (EPR) utilising the Oracle Health platform. This will be a joint platform across acute, community and mental health, enabling a more streamlined, transparent approach to patient care. It will link in with our shared care record (Orion) to allow GPs visibility of information and vice versa, as well as some information being sent to the patient portal, for example discharge letters, results, and questionnaires.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a unified electronic patient record across EPUT and MSEFT, including bidirectional primary-care integration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: We respectfully advise that MSEFT are best placed to respond to this concern, regarding access to GP records. With regards to access to the mental health records, the Trust in partnership with MSEFT are currently developing a new unified Electronic Patient record system across EPUT and MSEFT. The strategic ambition to unify care pathways remains at the centre of the programmes commitment including the bidirectional integration with primary care. The new UEPR (NOVA) is expected to go live across the Trust in February 2027.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about care before 6 June 2023 do not relate to the respondent, so it has identified no action concerning them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand from my colleagues in attendance at the Inquest hearing, that these matters of concern; points 1 – 5, do not relate to Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust (MSEFT), and we have not identified any action to be taken in respect of these.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 February 2025

    Open published response
  2. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Naomi SULEYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Naomi Suleyman developed and later died from pneumonia and complications of an unstageable sacral pressure sore after discharge from hospital, during a period when she was deconditioned and bedbound while her long-term needs were assessed. Concerns included inaccurate discharge information, missed welfare and therapy visits, an incorrect district nursing referral, poor communication between services, and missed opportunities to recognise and address that her discharge was unsafe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of communication between D2A therapists and District Nurses

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There was little communication between the therapists from the D2A team and the District Nurses. ”

    Source location

    Naomi SULEYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct further multi-agency discharge events to improve communication and joint working.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A multi-agency discharge event was carried out on 05/03/2025 which tests the systematic approach to discharge processes and further events are planned to improve multi agency communication and ways of working.”

    Source location

    Response from Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Lewisham Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish and disseminate an escalation and information-sharing pathway across community services, with ongoing monitoring and audit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is now an established pathway, for escalation of concerns and information sharing between community services (Podiatry, District nursing and Community therapies/Enablement). This information has been shared across the services and embedded at all levels and will be monitored and audited moving forward.”

    Source location

    Response from Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Lewisham Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain regular Discharge to Assess–District Nursing meetings and a communication champion to oversee information exchange and care-plan adherence.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In response to the report highlighting limited communication between the Discharge to Assess team and District Nurses, regular meetings have already been established between the teams to ensure consistent exchange of patient information. A staff member, or communication champion, has been appointed to oversee this process and ensure that care plans are followed. These communication efforts are being actively monitored and evaluated to confirm their effectiveness in preventing any future issues.”

    Source location

    Response from Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust and Lewisham Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 January 2025

    Open published response
  3. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    William Antony Northcott · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Antony Northcott, who had treatment-resistant schizophrenia, was found deceased on 13 July 2021 after suffering a sudden fatal cardiac arrhythmia. The report raised concerns about the adequacy and consistency of information on clozapine side effects and cardiac warning signs, the detection of cardiomyopathies in patients taking clozapine, and communication between agencies and care teams.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to achieve clear communication of key information within community mental health teams

    Wider context from the report

    “It is clear that patients suffering with treatment resistant schizophrenia are complex, and as such there are often a number of different agencies involved in an individual's care. In addition, there are often multiple members of the same team involved in an individual's care. During the inquest it became clear that, at times, communication of important issues was not as clear as it should have been. I note that Devon Partnership NHS Trust has significant training available for its staff and other agencies it engages with in relation to patients who are prescribed Clozapine. However, it would be of great assistance to understand what Devon Partnership NHS Trust is doing to ensure that optimum communication of key information is achieved within the community mental health team, and when dealing with its other agencies involved in a patient's care. ”

    Source location

    William Antony Northcott · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adopt SystmOne electronic patient records to enable consent-based information sharing between primary and secondary mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are a number of steps that Devon Partnership NHS Trust has adopted to ensure effective information sharing between those involved in the care of the patients.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and implement a process for sharing annual clozapine health-check outcomes with mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The practice would be happy to communicate the findings and results of the annual health checks with the Mental Health Services, providing that the patient has consented to this. We had considered involvement of the ICB and LMC to facilitate a streamlined approach. However, we have established that there is a Local Enhanced Service in place which we are currently reviewing and implementing a process to be able to share the outcomes and results from the annual review with Mental Health Services.”

    Source location

    Response from The Pembroke Medical Practice
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clinical discussions with prescribers and care delivered by the Trust fall outside the regulator’s remit, so it cannot directly address them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have considered the evidence provided and the circumstances leading to Mr Northcott’s death and acknowledge that most of your concerns relate to clinical discussions between a patient and their prescriber or via the clinical care delivered by the Trust. Unfortunately, the MHRA cannot directly address these points, as it is not within our remit to comment on the clinical care in specific cases.”

    Source location

    Response from Medicines and Healthcare Projects Regulation Authority
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Devon Partnership NHS Trust is responsible for improving internal and cross-agency communication, so no direct response is provided.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 3: Patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia typically receive support from multiple teams and agencies. During the inquest, it became apparent that communication between professionals was, at times, suboptimal. The Coroner seeks assurance that Devon Partnership NHS Trust is working to improve internal and cross-agency communication.”

    Source location

    Response from Devon ICB
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 February 2025

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Antony Williamson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Antony Williamson experienced chronic pelvic pain and associated mental health difficulties, including increasing suicidal thoughts, before leaving home on 19 December 2023 and entering cold water. His body was found in the River Mersey on 17 March 2024, and the inquest concluded that he died from dry drowning and took his own life while experiencing hopelessness about the investigation and treatment of his pelvic pain. The report identified a lack of liaison and communication between the medical and mental health specialties involved in his care, with no formal framework to facilitate inter-specialty communication in complex cases.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of specialties to communicate about patients’ plans and actions

    Wider context from the report

    “Throughout the inquest, it was apparent that save for the referral by the Urology team to the Pain Service in September 2023, there was no liaison or communication between any of the specialties involved in Mr Williamson’s care, which resulted in a lack of understanding on the part of each specialty of the plans and actions of the others. The inquest was told that there is a significant proportion of patients who are referred to the Pain Service who suffer poor mental health and who are therefore also under the care of mental health teams in the community. The inquest heard that there is no formal framework (other than in cancer care and one specialist area of surgery) either locally or nationally to facilitate inter-specialty communication, particularly in complex and dynamic cases and further, that the existing channels of communication are more problematic between different NHS Trusts even within the same geographical area. ”

    Source location

    Antony Williamson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent

    AI-generated summary

    Anne Patricia Leake · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anne Patricia Leake suffered cardiac arrest and arrhythmia, underwent heart valve surgery, and was released from hospital without the planned ICD being fitted. Three days later, she suffered a cardiac arrhythmia and died. The report identified concerns about hospital teams using inaccessible ward-based notes, the absence of a shared electronic records system, and continued reliance on manual transcription of treatment decisions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reliance on manual transcription of treatment decisions between medical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mrs Leake received treatment from three hospital teams: cardiology, cardiothoracic surgery and coronary intensive care. Each team uses their own ward-based medical notes which are not accessible by the other teams. Whilst each team has access to the iPortal system on which Mrs Leake’s MDT decision was stored, it was apparent that this was not accessed and acted upon. As a result, the MDT decision regarding Mrs Leake’s ICD was overlooked. (2) Plans to introduce electronic patient records to which all medical teams have access are still at an early stage and no date has been identified for moving over to a single electronic notes system. (3) The steps which the Trust has taken as a result of Mrs Leake’s death to address the risk of MDT decisions being missed in the future still rely upon the manual transcription of decisions from one set of medical notes to another, with the continuing potential for human error and important decisions about treatment being overlooked. ”

    Source location

    Anne Patricia Leake · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a digital vision and strategy including a goal for a new electronic patient record across the Integrated Care System.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst the Trust aspires to acquire a new, highly sophisticated, purpose-built single EPR system, this will necessitate securing significant capital investment, development and time to ensure safe deployment. To support this ambition, the trust is currently engaged in setting out a new digital vision and strategy, which includes the goal for a new EPR across the whole Integrated Care System (ICS).”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Draft a business case with the Integrated Care System to apply for NHS funding for an interoperable electronic patient record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The UНNM digital team together with the ICS, are drafting a business case to apply for NHS funding for an EPR that will meet our growing needs and provide the functionality and interoperability required to prevent the events that contributed to Mrs Leake’s death.”

    Source location

    Response from University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 27 December 2024

    Open published response
  6. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Alfie HINTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Baby Alfie Hinton died at Airedale Hospital on 10 May 2019 after complete umbilical cord occlusion led to hypoxic ischaemic brain injury. The report describes delays in induction, fetal monitoring, recognition of bradycardia and preparations for birth. Concerns included how maternal risk information was gathered, recorded and communicated, communication between consultants, and the absence of local policy for time-critical situations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of communication between consultant obstetric and anaesthetic staff in time critical situations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) During the course of the Inquest, I heard evidence about the difficulties in communication between the Consultant Obstetrician and Consultant Anaesthetist, with delays being caused by several attempts being made at sitting spinal anaesthetic, against the advice of the Obstetrician and the wishes of the patient, causing distress to staff and patient alike. I heard no evidence of any policy that provided direction or guidance in circumstances such as this. This gives rise to concerns in respect of communication, ongoing risk assessment and an absence of local policy in respect of the approach to be taken in such time critical situations. ”

    Source location

    Alfie HINTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen the anaesthesia guideline for Category 1 caesarean sections, including five-minute multidisciplinary review and conversion to general anaesthesia where appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Guideline was revised post Alfie’s case (March 2020 and again in October 2023) and the relevant sections (taken from the version created in October 2023) state:”

    Source location

    Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 2 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and publish a Category 1 caesarean section and fetal bradycardia process map covering escalation, anaesthetic decisions, effective anaesthesia and delivery timelines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Process – Category 1 Caesarean Section / Fetal Bradycardia”

    Source location

    Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 2 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed multidisciplinary PROMPT training for anaesthetists, obstetricians and midwives using an evidence-based human-factors approach.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of an organic development in health practice but also designed specifically to address the issues which occurred in this present case, particularly focussed on culture, leadership, team working and compliance with national standards, the Trust undertook the following:”

    Source location

    Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 2 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed simulation-based training using obstetric emergencies, incidents, case reviews and patient experience to improve emergency teamwork and learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. As explained in evidence to the Inquest, the Trust has embedded SIMS training – real life Simulation Based Training which is based on obstetric emergencies and scenarios. This is a learning tool used to improve team working in emergency procedures. The SIMS training includes learning from scenarios, incidents, case reviews, patients’ experience and themes and trends across the service to improve learning and reflection. This facilitates constructive feedback to aid teams working together, learning from scenarios and dynamic integration into current themes on the maternity unit.”

    Source location

    Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 2 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop Human Factors and Ergonomics Training Workshops led by a consultant anaesthetist to address systems and behavioural influences on outcomes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. As explained in evidence to the Inquest, the Trust has developed a programme of Human Factor and Ergonomics Training Workshops, led by a Consultant Anaesthetist, which focuses on systems issues within healthcare and how human behaviours influence outcome and can be modified through systems changes to achieve better clinical outcomes (the principles of such training are explained at Human factors | NHS England | Workforce, training and education).”

    Source location

    Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 9 · response
    Published 2 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing records, handovers, ward rounds, SBAR communication and coordinator oversight were relied upon to communicate risk and prioritise inductions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As to the specific issue of how risk factors are communicated, every expectant mother admitted to the maternity unit would be under the care of an obstetric consultant and/or midwife and those clinicians would bear responsibility for knowing the patient’s history and presentation and to review and complete the patient’s record, which would contain all such information.”

    Source location

    Response from Airedale NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 December 2024

    Open published response
  7. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Kingsley Efosa Imafidon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kingsley Efosa Imafidon, who had homozygous sickle cell disease and suspected liver cirrhosis, underwent a liver biopsy on 29 November 2023. He was found unresponsive at home on 2 December 2023, and the post-mortem examination found extensive fresh haemorrhage into the peritoneal cavity following the biopsy. The concerns included lack of apparent liaison about the relevance of his sickle cell disease, insufficient consideration of additional monitoring, and gaps in the biopsy guidance and procedure for patients with conditions such as HbSS.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of liaison between care teams about HbSS-relevant matters before liver biopsy

    Wider context from the report

    “• There was no apparent liaison between the teams involved in Kingsley's care to consider any matters that may be relevant to his HbSS prior to the biopsy being carried out; • The Trust’s Standard Operating Procedure (“SOP”) for Elective Liver Biopsy does not appear to give consideration to patients with other pathologies such as HbSS; • There was no apparent consideration given to potential additional post-operative monitoring or requirements for a patient with HbSS; • The Trust’s SOP refers to a document titled “Guidelines on the use of liver biopsy in clinical practice from the British Society of Gastroenterology, the Royal College of Radiologists and the Royal College of Pathology” (Neuberger J, Patel J, Caldwell H et al. Gut 2020) which provides advice on liver biopsy techniques, methods and aftercare etc. These guidelines do not appear to give consideration (and therefore guidance) in relation to the use of liver biopsy for patients with other pathologies such as HbSS. ”

    Source location

    Kingsley Efosa Imafidon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish advice on biopsy precautions for patients with blood disorders in a peer-reviewed journal within three months.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We would therefore agree that it is important to remind health care professionals that particular care must be taken in any patients with a prior history of blood disorders before any biopsy. We would encourage discussion with a consultant haematologist for anyone with any blood disorder that may predispose to extra bleeding such as sickle cell disease.”

    Source location

    Response from BSG
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish advice on biopsy precautions for patients with blood disorders in the BSG newsletter within one month.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We would therefore agree that it is important to remind health care professionals that particular care must be taken in any patients with a prior history of blood disorders before any biopsy. We would encourage discussion with a consultant haematologist for anyone with any blood disorder that may predispose to extra bleeding such as sickle cell disease.”

    Source location

    Response from BSG
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Elective Liver Biopsy SOP to require enhanced risk assessment, specialist MDT discussion, pre-assessment, relevant monitoring, and reference to current professional guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust’s Elective Liver Biopsy Standard Operating procedure (SOP) has been reviewed and updated in light of the concerns raised at the inquest, and the latest version was sent to Emergency Care, Medicine and Rehabilitation Services (EMRS) clinical governance meeting which was held on November 8. Within the updated SOP, Section 3 entitled ‘Vetting of Referrals’ has been amended to read as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from Homerton Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate the MDT approach and highlight the updated liver biopsy SOP to referring and booking clinicians through departmental communications and procedure-related emails.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The need to adopt a MDT approach in complex cases has been disseminated across the gastroenterology department, which is the main department referring patients for biopsies. The Trust has reviewed the process of biopsy referrals, the liver biopsy pre-assessment clinic and the patient information leaflet. This has led to the creation of a template on Electronic Patient Record (EPR) for use in the pre-assessment clinic.”

    Source location

    Response from Homerton Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 October 2024

    Open published response
  8. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Bryan Andrews and Mary Andrews · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Bryan and Mary Andrews died at their home on 27 November 2022 from multiple stab wounds inflicted by their adult son. The principal concern was a lack of communication between services about the relationship between his epilepsy and psychotic symptoms, resulting in treatment delays, rejected referrals and failures to share important information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate clinically relevant information between services about epilepsy and psychosis

    Wider context from the report

    “There was a lack of communication between services about the relationship between the diagnosis of epilepsy and the psychotic symptoms experienced by the person responsible for the deaths. This led to significant time lapses in treatment and rejection of referrals, most notably: i. On 18 November 2020 an urgent referral was made to the Single Point of Access Team by his General Practitioner, concerned about his prolonged suicidal ideation. He was referred back to his General Practitioner by the Single Point of Access Team with a request that the General Practitioner refer him to access the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service. ii. On 20 November 2020 his General Practitioner referred him to the Single Point of Access Team again, requesting they liaise with the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service as per Trust guidelines. iii. Correspondence between the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service and the Single Point of Access Team revealed that whilst the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Service offered work on living with chronic conditions, they did not have a programme specific to epilepsy. A referral to the Neurology Therapy Service was made and it was decided a request to the General Practitioner for the mental health nurse in the surgery to offer an assessment was appropriate. The surgery were not informed of this. iv. On 16 December 2020 the Single Point of Access Team received a referral from a consultant neurologist requesting a medication review as his anxiety levels were affecting his epilepsy treatment. It was felt at that as the General Practitioner was reviewing his medication, a review wasn’t required. This was not communicated to the consultant neurologist. v. On 29 April 2022 he called the Single Point of Access Team saying he was having a serious psychotic episode and thought he was going to kill someone. The call was treated as a crisis call during which he decided to attend the emergency department. Once there he was assessed by the Liaison Psychiatry Team. He was referred to the Home Treatment Team, but his consultant neurologist was not informed. vi. On 3 May 2022 a trial of anti-psychotic medication was discussed at a medical review. The required consultant review of whether to prescribe anti-psychotic medication with his epilepsy medication was not carried out. vii. On 4 May 2022 a referral to the Early Intervention Service was rejected as not meeting the criteria for first episode psychosis, despite clear evidence of psychosis in the assessment by the Liaison Psychiatry Team on 29 April 2022 and in subsequent contacts with the Home Treatment Team. viii. On 5 May 2022 a first referral was made to the Emotional Wellbeing Service via email asking for their input into his care. The email was sent to an address not manned daily. When a response was provided it was unclear whether a new treatment episode had been opened. ix. On 09 May 2022 he was discharged from the Home Treatment Team. The discharge was reliant on Emotional Wellbeing Service intervention and a follow up from his General Practitioner. A discharge summary was not sent to his General Practitioner. x. On 4 October 2022 a referral was sent to the Single Point of Access Team by his General Practitioner that he was presenting as paranoid and delusional with suicidal ideation. A screen for urgency found this was a routine referral. The referral was triaged on 22 November 2022 when he was invited to contact the Single Point of Access Team for a further discussion. ”

    Source location

    Bryan Andrews and Mary Andrews · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide Neurology Department with electronic crisis assessments and outcome plans for service users receiving neurological treatment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Single Point of Access Service within SHSC is no longer in operation, following a transformation programme of our Urgent and Crisis Services. We have, therefore, not set out any actions in this response relating to how this service deals with referrals, given that referrals now go into each individual service. We are committed to taking the following actions:”

    Source location

    Response from Sheffield Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response
  9. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Samuel Finlay Parkin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Samuel Finlay Parkin died on 16 September 2022 from hypoxic brain injury following a cardiac arrest caused by midgut volvulus. The volvulus resulted from undiagnosed intestinal malrotation, which had been present since birth and was not identified despite repeated symptoms and hospital attendances. The principal concerns included failure to undertake appropriate diagnostic testing, false reassurance from ultrasound reporting, inadequate safety-netting advice, and communication and learning issues between clinical teams.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of communication between clinical teams and within referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “6. The evidence before me suggested that there may have been a miscommunication or misunderstandings between the surgical, paediatric and paediatric gastroenterology teams regarding what had and had not been considered and excluded by each during Sam’s admission in 2015. In particular, St George’s written answers to Mr and Mrs Parkin’s question regarding whether there was miscommunication between the treating clinicians was simply “yes”. St George’s has therefore implemented an inpatient (written) referral form to the GI service. Action is required by St George’s and the wider NHS to consider/implement ways to minimise the possibility of miscommunication between teams/in referrals of all disciplines. ”

    Source location

    Samuel Finlay Parkin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce thorough contemporaneous documentation and team communication through resident doctor induction and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The requirement for thorough, contemporaneous documentation and communication between teams is reinforced in our local resident doctor induction and training. We have now formalised written referrals to paediatric gastroenterology in the patient record and will be rolling this out for all specialty consult requests within the paediatric directorate, with the expectation that a clear referral outcome will be formally documented.”

    Source location

    Response from St George's Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formalise written referrals to paediatric gastroenterology in the patient record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The requirement for thorough, contemporaneous documentation and communication between teams is reinforced in our local resident doctor induction and training. We have now formalised written referrals to paediatric gastroenterology in the patient record and will be rolling this out for all specialty consult requests within the paediatric directorate, with the expectation that a clear referral outcome will be formally documented.”

    Source location

    Response from St George's Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out written referrals with documented outcomes to all specialty consultation requests across the paediatric directorate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The requirement for thorough, contemporaneous documentation and communication between teams is reinforced in our local resident doctor induction and training. We have now formalised written referrals to paediatric gastroenterology in the patient record and will be rolling this out for all specialty consult requests within the paediatric directorate, with the expectation that a clear referral outcome will be formally documented.”

    Source location

    Response from St George's Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold monthly Paediatric Gastroenterology Radiology meetings to discuss complex cases and record outcomes in the electronic patient record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, we now hold a monthly Paediatric Gastroenterology Radiology meeting where complex cases are discussed. This is attended by consultant and resident doctors from paediatric gastroenterology, paediatric surgery and radiology and the outcomes of this meeting are recorded in the electronic patient record. This is leading to improved communication between paediatrics and radiology and allows diagnostic uncertainty to be openly discussed.”

    Source location

    Response from St George's Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the national paediatric gastroenterology service specification to reference second-opinion guidance and strengthen multidisciplinary communication and discussion of unexpected investigation results.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England Specialised Commissioning will soon begin work to update the published national service specification on Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition which outlines standards for specialised paediatric gastroenterology services. The updated service specification will reference the guidance produced on the provision of second opinions and will also ensure that the importance of communication between multi-disciplinary teams, including surgical, paediatric and paediatric gastroenterology teams, is highlighted. This will include the need for multi-disciplinary discussion for all patients where the results of investigations are not as anticipated.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local aspects of Samuel’s care fall outside the national policy and programmes addressed within NHS England’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your Report raised concerns over the understanding of limitations in using ultrasound to diagnose or rule out malrotation, and the threshold for additional diagnostic tests, particularly in older children. You also raised that there may have been miscommunication between the surgical, paediatric and paediatric gastroenterology teams. My response to the Coroner focuses only on the relevant national policy or programmes that sit within NHS England’s remit. NHS England’s National Specialty Adviser for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition has been consulted on your Report and has contributed to this response.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust should respond to concerns about its local management of Samuel’s care and provide further information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Many of the concerns raised in your Report are local to St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and their management of Samuel’s care, and it is appropriate that they respond to the Coroner on the matters raised. NHS England has been sighted on and has considered the Trust’s response. We note and welcome that the Trust have taken a number of learnings and actions from Samuel’s care, to include rewriting their local guidance on the management of abdominal pain in children, holding monthly Paediatric Gastroenterology Radiology meetings, and ensuring regular training around the limitations of ultrasound scans in looking for malrotation. We note that they are also leading on a dedicated malrotation session at the British Society of Paediatric Radiology. We refer the Coroner to the Trust for further information.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 July 2025

    Open published response
  10. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr David Thompson had a longstanding affective disorder and a history of alcohol and illicit drug use. After receiving inpatient and outpatient mental health care, he consumed alcohol and inflicted deep cuts to his wrists; he died on 3 March 2024 from hypovolaemic shock caused by the wrist injuries. Concerns included gaps in discharge planning and follow-up at Priory Dorking, incomplete awareness of his care and relapse history at Priory Altrincham, and a lack of communication between NHS and private consultants.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consult treating consultants across Priory locations

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was no consultation with the Consultants who had treated Mr Thompson at the Priory in Altrincham only a few weeks earlier. ”

    Source location

    Mr David Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send all doctors formal guidance on sharing correspondence when patients receive NHS and private-provider care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to provide assurance that Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust’s doctors are also adhering to this guidance formal communication has been sent to all doctors within the organisation from our Medical Director reminding them of this guidance and the GMC’s stipulation that all doctors must follow this. It also highlights this case and asks the doctors to take particular care if a patient is receiving treatment from both an NHS and private provider and that the private provider will also be copied into any correspondence.”

    Source location

    Response from Pennine Care NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Liaise with Medical Directors of Priory, Elysium and Cygnet to address communication failures collaboratively.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The organisation’s Medical Director will also liaise with the Medical Directors of all the private providers that Pennine Care patients are known to be placed. Contact will be made with the Priory, Elysium and Cygnet to raise the profile of this identified issue and to work collaboratively to ensure that this issue does not occur again.”

    Source location

    Response from Pennine Care NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct separate service-level Team Incident Reviews involving staff involved in care and consolidate findings at a senior-manager joint meeting for cross-service learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It was recognised that Mr Thompson had been a recent patient at both Priory Hospital Altrincham and Priory Hospital Dorking and hence why it was considered at the time that inviting representatives from both services to attend a joint TIR was good practice. On reflection, we conclude that we should have hosted a separate TIR at each service, inviting those involved in the care and treatment of the patient (to include nursing colleagues), and thereafter brought together the key findings at a joint meeting attended by the senior managers, to identify any areas for cross service learning. This learning point has since been reiterated to Priory’s Director of Quality and our regional Associate Directors of Nursing and Quality who are responsible for the commissioning and quality review of TIR’s.”

    Source location

    Response from Priory Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The organisation disputes that Consultant-to-Consultant communication failed through its omission, stating it was unaware of the private outpatient appointment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The organisation was not aware that David attended an outpatient appointment with ████████ at the Priory Hospital, Altrincham and therefore the opportunity for Consultant to Consultant communication to take place did not happen. The organisation’s expectation is for ████████ to copy the organisation into David’s clinic letter as per the section of ‘Contributing to continuity of care’ within the General Medical Council’s (GMC) ‘Good Medical Practice.’ The guidance states:”

    Source location

    Response from Pennine Care NHS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026