Recurring concern

Failure to reliably escalate requests for medical review

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 7 Apr 2014•Latest report 28 Mar 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to recognise, initiate, communicate, verbally escalate, track or follow up requests for medical review when a patient's condition or safety concern requires timely clinical assessment, including requests raised by families, carers or care staff.

Not included

  • Excludes delays caused solely by clinician unavailability after a request has been reliably escalated and accepted.
  • Excludes failures to conduct the clinical review itself when the request and escalation process operated reliably.
  • Excludes generic communication, documentation or staffing deficiencies that are not directly tied to escalating a request for medical review.
  • Excludes routine scheduled reviews where no patient-specific concern or request for timely medical assessment is identified.
Reports
14

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
14

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
19

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Office of the Chief Coroner2
Recipient name withheld2
Adbolton Hall1
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board1
Daryel Care1
Department of Health and Social Care1
East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust1
East London NHS Foundation Trust1
HCRG Care Coventry LLP1
Huddersfield Royal Infirmary1
Hunters Lodge1
Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
London Borough of Islington1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1
NHS Coventry and Warwickshire Integrated Care Board1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derrick Frederick Tully was found deceased at home on 20 March 2024 after suffering a massive traumatic subdural haemorrhage, following months of falls and declining health. Concerns included unsuitable temporary accommodation, the absence of a key safe despite repeated concerns, an inappropriate reablement care package, failures to record or escalate injuries after a fall, and the discharge of Derrick from a community team without adequately factoring in his cognitive, mental health and safety difficulties.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate significant post-fall injuries for medical review

    Wider context from the report

    “On 20 February Derrick suffered a fall. Severe bruising and swelling developed on his face over the following days but this was not recorded in his care notes by his carers and not escalated until his daughter raised concerns on 24 February. “No concerns” was written in Derrick’s care record and no consideration given to whether he needed to be reviewed by a doctor. ”

    Source location

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver mandatory refresher training on falls, head-injury recognition, recording, and escalation protocols to all care staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Actions Taken and Proposed Further Action Daryel Care is committed to learning from this incident and has taken and proposes the following actions to mitigate the risk of future similar occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update care-documentation guidance and training with structured prompts for detailed injury descriptions and recording the rationale for non-escalation after initial reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Actions Taken and Proposed Further Action Daryel Care is committed to learning from this incident and has taken and proposes the following actions to mitigate the risk of future similar occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The fall and developing injury were recorded in care notes, and the head injury was escalated promptly to the multi-disciplinary team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a. Recording of the Fall Incident (20 February 2024) The assertion that the fall incident was "not recorded" is factually incorrect based on Daryel Care's existing records. The electronic care note entry for the visit commencing at 19:00 hrs on 20 February 2024, logged at 19:04 hours, explicitly documents the following: “The carer observed Mr Tully upon arrival with a fresh plaster wrap and wound dressing on his scalp. Mr Tully informed the carer he had sustained an injury from a fall. The carer”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clinical oversight, including decisions about post-discharge medical review, was understood to be led by the Rapid Response team within the multi-agency framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “e. Consideration of Medical Review The PFD report raises concern that "no consideration given to whether he needed to be reviewed by a doctor." Daryel Care staff were operating within a complex multi-agency framework where clinical oversight, particularly post-discharge and concerning medication, was understood to be led by the Whittington Health Rapid Response team. The decision-making process regarding further medical review by Daryel Care staff considered the following factors: Firstly, Mr Tully had been assessed and treated at the hospital A&E department immediately following his fall on 20 February and was discharged home. Additionally, Daryel Care had formally escalated the head injury to the MDT (including Rapid Response) on the evening of 20 February. Observations during visits on 21 and 22 February recorded pain (on the 21st) and a swollen eye (on the 22nd).”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prior hospital assessment, existing MDT escalation, no acute red flags, and imminent care handover supported continued observation without separate immediate medical re-escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “e. Consideration of Medical Review The PFD report raises concern that "no consideration given to whether he needed to be reviewed by a doctor." Daryel Care staff were operating within a complex multi-agency framework where clinical oversight, particularly post-discharge and concerning medication, was understood to be led by the Whittington Health Rapid Response team. The decision-making process regarding further medical review by Daryel Care staff considered the following factors: Firstly, Mr Tully had been assessed and treated at the hospital A&E department immediately following his fall on 20 February and was discharged home. Additionally, Daryel Care had formally escalated the head injury to the MDT (including Rapid Response) on the evening of 20 February. Observations during visits on 21 and 22 February recorded pain (on the 21st) and a swollen eye (on the 22nd).”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Daryel Care reported the fall to Adult Social Care, while ambulance attendance and hospital treatment had already addressed the immediate response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is ASC’s understanding that Daryel Care was not requested to provide evidence to the coroner's court of their recording and reporting of the fall on the 20 February 2024. As part of ASC’s response to the PFD Notice, we have engaged Daryel Care who have provided their records. These evidence that on the 20 February 2024 at 19:12 ‘Derek sustained an injury on his face. He said he had an accident when he went out. The injury was plastered. I prompted his medication from the medication box, and he asked me to leave’.”

    Source location

    Response from Islington Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response
  2. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Amanda Jane GAINFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amanda Jane GAINFORD, aged 52, sustained abdominal injuries while detained in a mental health ward and later died at Aintree Hospital on 4 November 2022 from multiorgan failure due to splenic laceration and liver cirrhosis. The inquest identified missed opportunities to provide intravenous fluids and call an ambulance earlier while she had prolonged low blood pressure. It also raised concern that clinicians were not sufficiently aware of the ability to challenge ambulance call categorisation and request a clinical review from the ambulance service.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clinician awareness of the ability to challenge ambulance call categorisation and request clinical review

    Wider context from the report

    “During the inquest the court heard evidence from the North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) witness who confirmed that call handlers for the service are not medically trained but receive basic medical training. The system used nationally to categorise calls is reliant upon questions asked and information which is input by the call handler to achieve a categorisation of a call. In this case, there was no evidence the call categorisation was incorrect, however, an ambulance was called on 3 occasions due to Amanda's condition, on the last occasion that call was made by a Doctor on the scene providing care for Amanda, who as of the opinion that he was unable to keep the patient stable due to low blood pressure over a prolonged period. The NWAS witness gave evidence to the court that had the Doctor disagreed with the category 2 classification of the call or sought to escalate his clinical concerns regarding a patient, that he had the ability to challenge that and to request a review by a clinician available to NWAS. The Doctor was unaware that he had the ability to challenge the call handler categorisation and to seek a review by a clinician at NWAS, at which point the nature and seriousness of Amanda's condition could have been further reviewed and clearly understood. At a further course attended subsequently by the Doctor he advised that of 50 Doctors in attendance, only 1 was aware of the ability to escalate concerns regarding a patient and the categorisation of a 999 call to the Ambulance service and subsequent response time. It appears that this is an important fact unknown by many clinicians which would enable a clinician to clinician review of a critical patient and the use and dispatch of ambulance resources to prevent the loss of life in critical cases which are not automatically categorised at the highest level of response. ”

    Source location

    Amanda Jane GAINFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish and maintain a national framework enabling healthcare professionals to challenge ambulance call categorisation and request clinical review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your Report raised the concern that many healthcare professionals (HCPs) were unaware of their ability to challenge ambulance call handler categorisation and seek a review by a clinician.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The framework advises healthcare professionals that they may challenge the assigned ambulance category or response time based on clinical concern.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Framework includes the question order for HCP requests and the information that HCPs will be asked to provide. Clinicians using the HCP process are advised of both the category of call assigned and an estimated response time based on the current activity level. They are given the option to add anything else once that information is shared and would be able to challenge the category/response based on clinical concern.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 October 2024

    Open published response
  3. Lancashire and Blackburn with Darwen

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret Clement · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Clement, aged 92, died at Royal Blackburn Hospital on 15 June 2022 after developing significant rectal bleeding, vomiting blood and an upper gastrointestinal bleed following hospital admission after a fall. Concerns included inadequate nursing records and handovers, ineffective prioritisation of urgent tasks, failure to seek urgent clinical assistance for significant rectal bleeding, and inadequate assessment of compliance with procedural changes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to request medical review verbally when appropriate

    Wider context from the report

    “(4)Nurs staff failed to request medical review verbally where it was appropriate to do so, relying on a task book. ”

    Source location

    Margaret Clement · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remove doctors’ task books and route non-urgent requests through Cerner, with urgent concerns verbally escalated to medical staff or the Acute Care Team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Firstly, since 21 June 2024, the doctors’ tasks book on Reedyford has been removed. I can confirm that now all doctors’ tasks (non-urgent) are requested via the Whiteboard on Cerner (the Trust’s Clinical Electronic Record system) during core hours. Urgent actions are communicated verbally and escalated directly to medical staff during core hours and to the Acute Care Team out of hours.”

    Source location

    Response from East Lancashire Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display the ward escalation plan with staged escalation requirements, observation frequencies and staff responsibilities, supported by staff awareness and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Secondly, the SOP091 Pendle Community Hospital Ward Escalation Plan which was referred to at the inquest, includes a nurse escalation process, outlines the Early Warning Score, the frequency of observations and an escalation protocol, and has been printed/laminated and attached to the clinical observation equipment, so it is visibly available on the ward. A hard copy of the SOP is also available on the ward and all staff are aware of the escalation pathway which contains the staged process, outlining what action needs to be taken and by when. I have received assurance from the Ward Manager that all staff are now compliant with the awareness and training of the nurse escalation process on the ward.”

    Source location

    Response from East Lancashire Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enable nursing staff to accompany doctors on ward rounds and use the daily multidisciplinary meeting to escalate concerns and immediate actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regards to the above concern, I am aware that nursing staff on the ward relied heavily on the doctor’s task book to escalate to actions. In addition to the removal of the task books, nursing staff now accompany the doctors on their ward rounds and make use of the daily MDT to escalate concerns and immediate actions where necessary.”

    Source location

    Response from East Lancashire Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Arrange simulation-based deterioration training for community-ward staff, including assessment, escalation, handover, documentation and gastrointestinal-bleeding scenarios.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Firstly, the Trust has arranged simulation training for all staff on the community wards. The staff are presented with a history of the patient and are asked to detail how they would assess that individual; this is repeated a number of times looking at the appropriate and most effective ways to identify any concerns or deteriorations in a patient. The staff are expected to complete full assessments of clinical observations, a physical examination of the patient, discuss handover and who they would escalate to. Detailed documentation is also discussed, including Incident reporting and the importance of accurate timely documentation.”

    Source location

    Response from East Lancashire Hospitals
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 May 2024

    Open published response
  4. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Delina Etienne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Delina Etienne, who had schizo-affective disorder and was an inpatient receiving treatment, was found unresponsive in bed on 7 May 2021 and was declared deceased at the scene. The report identifies concerns about the chaotic response to her cardiac arrest, including failure to follow resuscitation procedures and an erroneous assumption that a DNACPR order was in place. It also identifies concerns about failures to escalate raised blood pressure and chest pain, assess VTE risk, and disclose the resuscitation error.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate episodes of raised blood pressure for medical review

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Whilst Mrs Etienne was an inpatient, the ward failed to escalate episodes of raised blood pressure for medical review in contravention of trust policy. ”

    Source location

    Delina Etienne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train staff on NEWS2 blood-pressure updates and revise NEWS2 scoring and recording templates in RiO.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NEWS 2-update training on blood pressure has been undertaken by 62 staff, and NEWS 2 scores template and recording within the RiO medical records has now been revised.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enable automatic RiO alerts for physical-health observations outside expected limits, including action guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The electronic recording system for NEWS 2 now has automatic alerts for all physical health observations recorded which are outside expected limits. This highlights any concern and advises on action to be taken by the person entering the readings.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide Cazaubon Ward staff training on elevated blood-pressure assessment and repeat measurement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A training template was created and reviewed with each Cazaubon Ward staff member in May 2022.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit Cazaubon Ward blood-pressure management monthly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Monthly audits of the ward in relation to management of blood pressure started in May 2022 and are ongoing.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 October 2022

    Open published response
  5. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Darren John Goddard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darren John Goddard underwent an elective trans-rectal ultrasound of the prostate and subsequently developed sepsis, becoming acutely unwell and dying on 18 April 2019. The principal concerns included delayed recognition and treatment of sepsis, delays in triage, antibiotics, fluids and critical care, and the information provided about sepsis risks and symptoms following the procedure.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure at triage to escalate referrals for medical review within 10 minutes of admission

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) The failure at triage to escalate this referral to seeing a doctor within 10 mins of admission. ”

    Source location

    Darren John Goddard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ongoing Sepsis training on the Sepsis 6 bundle and NEWS documentation, escalation and implementation to medical and nursing staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Further training of Triage nursing staff and doctors of the sepsis 6 bundle and”

    Source location

    2020-0060-Response-from-Dr-Hopkins-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 March 2020

    Open published response
  6. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    Keith Graham WHETTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith Graham WHETTON had an unwitnessed fall in his care home on 7 September 2019, was later found to have a fractured right hip, underwent surgery, and died at the care home on 5 October 2019. Concerns included the delay in seeking medical attention after the fall and the possibility that family members were not informed promptly.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to request necessary medical attention

    Wider context from the report

    “You should already be aware of the concerns in this matter. Even if medical attention was not sought for Keith on 7th September it clearly should have been requested on 8th September. We hope that this has now been taken on board by your home. Additionally, family members felt that they should have been informed earlier about Keith’s fall and I wonder if lessons have been learned here as well. ”

    Source location

    Keith Graham WHETTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and implement the home's falls policy and procedure with clearer instructions for unwitnessed falls and post-fall actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have also reviewed the policy and procedure of falls within the home and spoken with the regional managers regarding unwitnessed falls and the policy and procedure has now been updated and put in place within the home. The policy is now more robust and has clearer instructions on steps to be taken in the event of a fall.”

    Source location

    2019-0452-Response-by-Hunters-Lodge-Care-Centre_Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 January 2020

    Open published response
  7. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    James William Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James William Francis, who had a history of falls and balance difficulties, suffered an unwitnessed fall at his care home on 9 April 2017 and later developed repeated vomiting and deterioration. He was admitted to hospital with a large subdural haematoma and died on 11 April 2017. The principal concerns included failures in shift handover and monitoring, delays in seeking medical advice, inadequate information provided to paramedics, the patient’s positioning, staff training, and whether relevant guidelines sufficiently addressed this type of injury in elderly patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in seeking out-of-hours medical advice and requesting GP review

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that when Mr Francis was sick three times during the late afternoon and early evening of the day of his fall, no action was taken to seek out of hours medical advice In addition, despite a significant deterioration in Mr Francis condition later in the day of his fall and more significantly the following morning and after five separate referrals by the day support worker to the team leader, there was a five hour delay in making a simple telephone call to request a GP visit. Further, there does not appear to have been any thought given to making a call to NHS 111 for advice. It was also unclear exactly what information was given to the GP surgery to stress the history and deterioration in Mr Francis condition ”

    Source location

    James William Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the GP and NHS 111 escalation procedure, including urgency assessment, clear clinical communications and service-level auditing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I also refer to the attached “Request for attendance of GP” policy which states that if a Service User develops a health problem or if the Service User requests to see their GP, the senior person on duty will assess the situation and contact the surgery, before the medication round commences. In assessing the urgency of the situation, the GP Surgery can be approached for advice or otherwise to liaise with the District Nursing service as appropriate it goes on to set very clear expectations in referring to the NHS 111 service and also the importance of clear communications.”

    Source location

    2019-0202-Response-by-Shaw-Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response
  8. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Vanessa Ferkova and Sylvia Daniel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Vanessa Ferkova, aged 2, died after presenting to a walk-in centre with fever and vomiting, developing a rash, and later suffering cardiac arrest; the report states she died from meningococcus septicaemia. Sylvia Daniel, aged 73, presented with symptoms including neck pain, was diagnosed with an ear infection, and was found deceased the following morning; the report states she died from acute meningitis. Concerns included delays and deficiencies in initial assessment and registration, failure to transcribe or retain information provided by families, and an unsafe non-clinical triage and flagging process.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to act on deterioration or requests for earlier prompt review raised through the flagging process

    Wider context from the report

    “4. My final specific concern relates to the process whereby patients/families are asked to let the reception team know if the patient is deteriorating, or if they are concerned that earlier prompt review is required. I heard evidence that such concerns were raised but no action was taken. This seemingly runs counter to Virgin Care’s own ‘flagging’ system. ”

    Source location

    Vanessa Ferkova and Sylvia Daniel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Miss Lea Louise Hunsley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lea Hunsley, who had profound cerebral palsy and complex healthcare needs, became increasingly unwell while in respite care on 9 July 2016 and died after cardio-respiratory arrest at Wythenshawe Hospital Emergency Department shortly after midnight on 10 July 2016. The report identified missed opportunities to assess, escalate and intervene, and raised concerns about the facility’s lack of protocols, staff’s ability to recognise deterioration, inadequate observations and monitoring, failure to use care records appropriately, and insufficient action following a CQC inspection.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate deteriorating patients for medical review

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Registered Nurse/s and Carers at EAM: i) lack the ability to identify, recognise and act upon the deteriorating patient; ii) in this case, did not escalate for medical review (no policy/protocol exists for the same); iii) demonstrated a poor standard of basic (physiological) observation and monitoring & iv) failed to read and use the care records appropriately (in particular, the RN did not read important/critical entries on the 9th at all). ”

    Source location

    Miss Lea Louise Hunsley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop deteriorating-patient protocols tailored to each young person’s care needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “future we would obtain a post-operative care plan or information from the Consultant, following a multi-disciplinary meeting, ahead of any proposed stay in order that we may assess the support needs. If the risks associated exceeded our capabilities then we would not proceed with an admission, until the risks associated had sufficiently reduced. Any post-surgical admissions would include a post-operative care plan, prior to admission, to ensure that all staff involved in the young person’s care were adequately up to date in their support needs. We are currently developing deteriorating patient protocols specific to each young person’s care needs. These are to be in place in the next three months.”

    Source location

    2018-0101-Response-by-EAM-Care-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish escalation of family, carer or professional concerns to primary care, out-of-hours services or paramedics regardless of nursing observations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• If any family member, carer or professional had concerns we would now escalate to GP/Out of Hours service or Paramedic, even if the Registered Nurse’s observations show no concerns.”

    Source location

    2018-0101-Response-by-EAM-Care-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an updated When to Seek Medical Advice policy, requiring staff acknowledgement and signatures and addressing family concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is now an updated When to Seek Medical Advice policy that staff have read and signed which advises when to seek medical help and to listen to family concerns.”

    Source location

    2018-0101-Response-by-EAM-Care-Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the hospital admission and discharge policy to include When to Seek Medical Advice guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Hospital admission/discharge policy updated with ‘When to Seek Medical Advice’ now included in the policy.”

    Source location

    2018-0101-Response-by-EAM-Care-Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 June 2018

    Open published response
  10. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan Osborne, who had diabetes and advanced dementia, died on 25 August 2017 after repeated difficulties obtaining her blood glucose levels and administering her insulin. The concerns included failures by nursing home staff to seek medical assistance or escalate her missed insulin, inadequate records, failure to recognise her deteriorating condition, and inaccurate blood glucose measurement and treatment on 22 August 2017.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to seek medical assistance when insulin is refused over an extended period

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The nursing home staff did not seek medical assistance for Mrs Osborne when she refused to have her insulin prescription over an extended period, on two separate occasions, leading to her hospitalisation on 12.08.2017 and 22.08.2017. ”

    Source location

    Joan Osborne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prioritise diabetes care planning, including instructions for seeking medical assistance when insulin or medication is refused.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care planning with regards to diabetes management has been prioritised, as part of the lessons learned, and where required care plans include details with regards to when and how to seek medical assistance if insulin/medication is refused by a resident.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Diabetes care is considered adequately assessed and provided because relevant authorities were satisfied the home’s complex-needs admissions were safe.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “their pre-admission assessments were sent to ████████, Management Officer for the Quality and Market Management Team within Nottinghamshire County Council, and ████████, Care Home Quality Lead Nottingham North and East, Nottingham West and Rushcliffe Clinical Commissioning Group, to ensure that they were confident that the home could meet each individual’s needs. On 26 March 2018, ████████ advised the home that they were not required to continue to send these to them, as they were satisfied that all the home’s admissions, including those with individuals with complex needs, were safe. We are confident therefore that diabetes care is adequately assessed and provided for.”

    Source location

    2018-0091-Response-by-Adbolton-Hall-Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 June 2018

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026