Recurring concern

Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 16 Sep 2013•Latest report 29 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes deficiencies in controls dedicated to the ACCT process, including quality assurance, observations, reviews, documentation, information sharing, staffing or training, where the failure undermines reliable ACCT risk prevention or management.

Not included

  • Excludes generic organisational quality assurance, staffing or training failures that are not explicitly tied to ACCT.
  • Excludes unrelated prison, healthcare or mental-health processes that do not form part of ACCT.
  • Excludes outcomes, individual clinical judgments or underlying causes unless the assertion identifies a failure of an ACCT control.
Reports
92

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
184

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
276

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

HM Prison and Probation Service41
Ministry of Justice27
NHS England15
Care UK6
Department of Health and Social Care6
HM Prison Service6
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust5
Hewell Prison5
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust5
HM Inspectorate of Prisons4
Practice Plus Group4
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Birmingham Prison3
G4S3
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Milton Keynes

    AI-generated summary

    Ian Keith Brown · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ian Keith Brown, who had mental illness and was on remand at HMP Woodhill, was found in his cell with a belt ligature around his neck on 19 July 2015 and was pronounced dead at 14:00 hours. Concerns were raised that recommendations to improve suicide and self-harm prevention, including ACCT case management and a prison-wide strategy, had not been implemented sufficiently, while suicides and self-harm at HMP Woodhill continued to rise.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain adequate ACCT case management documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “(1)During the course of the evidence I was referred to the most recent report from the HM Inspector of Prisons that highlighted “Recommendations made by the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman following previous deaths in custody, such as the need to improve the quality of ACCT case management documentation for prisoners at risk of suicide or self harm, had not been implemented with sufficient rigour. (2) Deaths at the prison from suicide and self harm continue to rise. (3) The recommendation from the Inspectors is that there should be a “prison-wide strategy and action plan to reduce the number of self inflicted deaths and incidents of self harm should be developed urgently. This should be based on detailed data and trend analysis and include implementation of Prison and Probation Ombudsman recommendations. It should also include improvements in the quality of ACCT case management documentation, and the lessons learned from internal investigations into life-threatening incidents.” I have concerns that the recommendations will not be implemented and that past recommendations have been ignored. (4) That despite my previous PFD reports the number of suicides at HMP Woodhill continue to rise. ”

    Source location

    Ian Keith Brown · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Case Management training to managers who chair ACCT case reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An early example of the improvement that is being driven by the taskforce is in the management of the ACCT process. The establishment has now delivered Case Management”

    Source location

    2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a case-review booking system to improve case-manager continuity and multidisciplinary team attendance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “training to 90% of managers who chair ACCT case reviews. A new case review booking system is in place to improve the continuity of case manager attendance and to ensure that all members of the multi-disciplinary team are able to plan their attendance at review meetings. The prison is also implementing a system to provide each offender supported through the ACCT process with a designated case manager throughout the period for which the ACCT remains open. This approach will bring further improvement in the quality and consistency of case reviews and care plans.”

    Source location

    2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a designated case-manager system for each offender supported through the ACCT process while the ACCT remains open.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “training to 90% of managers who chair ACCT case reviews. A new case review booking system is in place to improve the continuity of case manager attendance and to ensure that all members of the multi-disciplinary team are able to plan their attendance at review meetings. The prison is also implementing a system to provide each offender supported through the ACCT process with a designated case manager throughout the period for which the ACCT remains open. This approach will bring further improvement in the quality and consistency of case reviews and care plans.”

    Source location

    2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 May 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing prison governance and monitoring processes are considered sufficient to deliver action on HMIP, PPO and Regulation 28 recommendations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I hope this provides you with assurance that the Governor of HMP Woodhill, and the Deputy Director of Custody for High Security Prisons, have put in place processes and governance that will achieve successful action in response to the recommendations from HMIP and the PPO, and the matters of concern raised in your Regulation 28 reports, and that this will bring the necessary improvements in safety at the prison.”

    Source location

    2016-0200-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 May 2016

    Open published response
  2. Central Hampshire

    AI-generated summary

    Sheldon Woodford · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sheldon Woodford was found hanging in his prison cell on 9 March 2015 and subsequently died in hospital on 12 March 2015 after sustaining a significant hypoxic brain injury. The report identified concerns about the identification of the SASH document during reception, ACCT process training, staffing levels, and the unstructured application of the ACCT process, including inadequate integration between prison staff and healthcare.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training of officers in ACCT processes

    Wider context from the report

    “(1)That in the reception process the SASH document is not identifiable to all relevant staff. (2)Training of Officers in the ACCT processes. ”

    Source location

    Sheldon Woodford · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew Colin SARGENT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew Colin SARGENT was a serving prisoner who died in his cell at some time between 25 and 26 September 2014. The jury concluded that he committed suicide and raised concerns about the systematic, accurate and clear sharing of historical and current information between prison and healthcare departments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to inform Healthcare staff when prisoners arrive with an ACCT history

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was a concern that Healthcare staff were not made aware of prisoners who arrive with an ACCT history and it was suggested that Healthcare should be informed in all cases where a prisoner arrives at reception with an ACCT history so that there is a continued sharing of pertinent information. ”

    Source location

    Matthew Colin SARGENT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the reception screening process to develop a standard first-reception screening template across prison healthcare settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As stated above, Care UK was not the healthcare provider at HMP Long Lartin at the time of Mr Sargent’s death. Going forward, the Care UK suicide prevention strategy will be shared and rolled out across all sites. In addition, since taking over healthcare responsibility on 1 April 2016, Care UK plans to review the reception screening process to introduce a standard template for first reception screening across its prison healthcare settings. We are also looking at the process of information gathering on reception and the culture around this. We will expect staff to ask ‘Where is the information for this patient?’ and the SystemOne template will reflect this, ensuring that staff cannot proceed without seeking out the information and recording reasons why, in instances where the information is not available.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Sargent-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 April 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the SystemOne reception template to require staff to seek available information and record reasons when it is unavailable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As stated above, Care UK was not the healthcare provider at HMP Long Lartin at the time of Mr Sargent’s death. Going forward, the Care UK suicide prevention strategy will be shared and rolled out across all sites. In addition, since taking over healthcare responsibility on 1 April 2016, Care UK plans to review the reception screening process to introduce a standard template for first reception screening across its prison healthcare settings. We are also looking at the process of information gathering on reception and the culture around this. We will expect staff to ask ‘Where is the information for this patient?’ and the SystemOne template will reflect this, ensuring that staff cannot proceed without seeking out the information and recording reasons why, in instances where the information is not available.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Sargent-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 April 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure reception information-gathering processes are clear and effective.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will ensure our processes for obtaining information on reception are clear and effective and build relationships with local community providers to improve information flow. Furthermore, we will record lack of information at reception on our incident system so that we understand the extent of the issues and can monitor trends and share good practice. We recognise that we cannot rely solely on the first night reception and that on-going assessment over several days is essential in order to ensure we are aware of any changing clinical picture and to take account of any new information that arrives.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Sargent-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 April 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prison Service staff are responsible for examining and sharing PER and ACCT information with healthcare staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These two points raise similar issues and can be answered together. It is the responsibility of prison service staff to share information with other departments and agencies both internal and external. PSI 74/2011 (First Days in Custody) sets out the requirement for the Person Escort Record (PER) form to be examined in Reception by prison staff to identify any immediate needs and risks and for this information to be forwarded to other staff and agencies as necessary, including healthcare. PSI 74/2011 sets out the mandatory requirements for prison staff and healthcare in respect of a prisoner’s ACCT status, ACCT alerts and risk assessments. Care UK thus expects PSI 74/2011 to be followed and that prison personnel will record a prisoner’s ACCT status on their record and share this and any concerns with Healthcare.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Sargent-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 April 2016

    Open published response
  4. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Steven James May · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Steven James May died by hanging at HMP Ranby on 25 May 2015 at 01:45, after previously expressing suicidal intent and being placed on the ACCT programme. The report identified concerns about failures in reception health screening, ACCT documentation and reviews, information handovers, staff training and involvement, emergency first aid, cell-entry procedures, and access to health and mental health care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Involvement of prison staff lacking relevant training or appropriate rank in the ACCT process

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) The involvement in the ACCT process of prison staff possessing neither relevant training nor the appropriate rank; ”

    Source location

    Steven James May · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prepare sufficiently full ACCT assessment notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The failure of prison staff when preparing the ACCT document to prepare as full a note as possible. For example, to follow the subject areas suggested in the narrative accompanying sections 1-8 of the Assessment Interview; ”

    Source location

    Steven James May · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue improved operational guidance for ACCT processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At national level a review of the ACCT process was conducted in 2015 and NOMS is taking forward work on the recommendations, including issuing improved operational guidance for staff, developing a shorter and clearer ACCT plan and improving the content and delivery of safer custody training.”

    Source location

    Steven-May-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 March 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve safer custody training content and delivery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At national level a review of the ACCT process was conducted in 2015 and NOMS is taking forward work on the recommendations, including issuing improved operational guidance for staff, developing a shorter and clearer ACCT plan and improving the content and delivery of safer custody training.”

    Source location

    Steven-May-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 March 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clarify band and grade requirements for ACCT assessor and case manager roles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “One of the recommendations of the national review of the ACCT process referred to above was for further work to clarify the band/grade requirements for staff in assessor and case manager roles and work on this is being taken forward during 2016.”

    Source location

    Steven-May-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 March 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to make comprehensive records of ACCT assessment interviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Staff at HMP Ranby were reminded of the need to make comprehensive records of all such interviews at a briefing on 23 March 2016. All ACCT documents at the prison are now being monitored by the Head of Safer Custody and the quality assurance check that is conducted addresses this point.”

    Source location

    Steven-May-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 March 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor ACCT documents through Head of Safer Custody oversight and quality assurance checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Staff at HMP Ranby were reminded of the need to make comprehensive records of all such interviews at a briefing on 23 March 2016. All ACCT documents at the prison are now being monitored by the Head of Safer Custody and the quality assurance check that is conducted addresses this point.”

    Source location

    Steven-May-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 March 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue notice requiring relevant information to be recorded in ACCT documents, wing observation books and P-NOMIS.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At HMP Ranby a notice was issued in February 2016 reminding staff that those responsible for a prisoner on an open ACCT must record all relevant information in the ACCT document, the wing observation book and on the P-NOMIS system. Both the prison and the healthcare provider have recently reviewed their procedures to ensure that systems are in place for information to be shared between prison and healthcare staff and recorded appropriately. In order further to improve information sharing, meetings of the multi-disciplinary team for prisoners identified as being vulnerable or at risk of harm are held every two weeks, and any ongoing concerns are discussed and recorded.”

    Source location

    Steven-May-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 March 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The remaining seven concerns were matters for HM Prison Service and other parties, so the Trust could not respond to them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust cannot respond to the other 7 concerns highlighted in the Prevent Future Death report as they are matters for HM Prison Service and/or other parties.”

    Source location

    2016-0109-Response-by-Nottingham-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 16 March 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Healthcare concerns are assigned to NHS England and Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, which addressed them separately.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You will be aware that healthcare at HMP Ranby is commissioned by NHS England and provided by Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, and I understand that the matters of concern that you have raised at points 1, 2 and 10 have been addressed separately by the Chief Executive of the Trust in a letter dated 13 April 2016, and by the Clinical Quality Manager at NHS England in a letter dated 5 May 2016. This response therefore addresses the matters of concern at points 3 to 9.”

    Source location

    Steven-May-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 16 March 2016

    Open published response
  5. Milton Keynes

    AI-generated summary

    Daniel Brendan Byrne · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Daniel Brendan Byrne died at Milton Keynes Hospital on 27 February 2015 after being resuscitated following a suicide attempt by hanging in his cell at Woodhill Prison the previous day. The principal concerns were inadequate assessment of the risk of self-harm and suicide by healthcare staff and prison officers, failure to refer him for an urgent mental health assessment, and an inadequate first ACCT case review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of healthcare staff to fully participate in suicide and self-harm risk assessment for new prisoners

    Wider context from the report

    “In the Independent Investigation Report from the Prison and Probation Ombudsman, the author refers to previous deaths at Woodhill and says: “ Mr Byrne’s was the seventh self inflicted death at Woodhill since 2013 and there have been two since. We are concerned that many of the same issues have been repeated in a number of their investigations including this one. In six cases investigated in 2013 and 2014 we found that staff had failed to identify or properly assess the risk of suicide and self harm in newly arrived prisoners.” My concern is that during the evidence from the Nursing Staff, it appears that they did not participate fully in the health screen at reception of the first review of Mr Byrne’s ACCT. There needs to be a review of healthcare staff’s role in carrying out a full and adequate risk assessment of suicide and self-harm whenever a new prisoner is seen and assessed by healthcare. Consideration should also be given to the introduction of a formal risk assessment tool. ”

    Source location

    Daniel Brendan Byrne · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen the reception screening tool with detailed mental-health, self-harm and suicide-risk questions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “While there is no nationally recognised best-practice ‘tool’ or best practice guidance, beyond the process identified in the PSIs identified above, the reception screening tool has been strengthened and more detailed questioning around mental health, risk of self-harm and suicide has been added. CNWL staff undertaking the reception screening role have been trained in its use, with all staff due to complete training by March 2016. Agency staff, where used, will also be fully trained.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train reception-screening staff, including agency staff where used, to apply the strengthened screening tool.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “While there is no nationally recognised best-practice ‘tool’ or best practice guidance, beyond the process identified in the PSIs identified above, the reception screening tool has been strengthened and more detailed questioning around mental health, risk of self-harm and suicide has been added. CNWL staff undertaking the reception screening role have been trained in its use, with all staff due to complete training by March 2016. Agency staff, where used, will also be fully trained.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase experienced mental-health nursing capacity in the First Night Centre to support risk assessment and management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From January 2016, CNWL has increased the number of experienced Mental Health trained nursing staff into the First Night Centre. The role of these staff is to support the system as a whole in assessing which of the men arriving within HMP Woodhill may pose a risk to themselves and ensuring that this risk is properly managed. NHS England has agreed additional funding for 2015-16 to increase staff capacity. In addition to the initial risk assessment on the first night, which includes a comprehensive risk assessment identifying self-harm and suicide indicators, there is now a secondary health screen carried out the next day that also screens for risks of self-harm. Further to this, a member of the Mental Health team is present at the First Night Centre (FNC) and carries out a risk assessment on all the men that arrived in the prison on the day before.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a next-day secondary health screen for self-harm risk after the initial reception assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From January 2016, CNWL has increased the number of experienced Mental Health trained nursing staff into the First Night Centre. The role of these staff is to support the system as a whole in assessing which of the men arriving within HMP Woodhill may pose a risk to themselves and ensuring that this risk is properly managed. NHS England has agreed additional funding for 2015-16 to increase staff capacity. In addition to the initial risk assessment on the first night, which includes a comprehensive risk assessment identifying self-harm and suicide indicators, there is now a secondary health screen carried out the next day that also screens for risks of self-harm. Further to this, a member of the Mental Health team is present at the First Night Centre (FNC) and carries out a risk assessment on all the men that arrived in the prison on the day before.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide daily Mental Health team risk assessments for prisoners arriving at the First Night Centre.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From January 2016, CNWL has increased the number of experienced Mental Health trained nursing staff into the First Night Centre. The role of these staff is to support the system as a whole in assessing which of the men arriving within HMP Woodhill may pose a risk to themselves and ensuring that this risk is properly managed. NHS England has agreed additional funding for 2015-16 to increase staff capacity. In addition to the initial risk assessment on the first night, which includes a comprehensive risk assessment identifying self-harm and suicide indicators, there is now a secondary health screen carried out the next day that also screens for risks of self-harm. Further to this, a member of the Mental Health team is present at the First Night Centre (FNC) and carries out a risk assessment on all the men that arrived in the prison on the day before.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and complete Trust-wide e-learning on assessing and managing self-harm and suicide risk for HMP Woodhill staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have gone further and in the last year CNWL has been developing a new on-line e-learning training package, developed by our mental health staff, which will better equip staff in assessing the risk of self-harm and suicide. We have been concerned to raise the awareness of all staff but particularly those undertaking reception screening about both the risk of suicide and appropriate risk management processes. This package has been trialled across the Trust’s Offender Care services and all CNWL staff in HMP Woodhill will have completed this training by the end of February 2016. Once its effectiveness has been audited, the tool will be shared with NOMS and NHS England for use in prison healthcare services outside of the Trust.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ongoing support for prison ACCT training and prison-led ACCT management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continue to work closely with NOMS, and all of the changes noted above have been discussed with them. We continue to provide support for ACCT training processes and support the prison in managing the prison-led ACCT process. CNWL staff actively check each day that relevant information has been appropriately shared and that we review ACCTs at each planned review meeting. We have audited our record keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure that risk related information is both appropriately recorded and shared. This monitoring will be on-going in HMP Woodhill and in our other services. We have discussed with the Prison Governor and the NOMS the use of ‘safer cells’ (where all ligature points have been removed) but we understand that there are no safer cells within HMP Woodhill at this time.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Check daily information-sharing and review ACCT records at each planned review meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continue to work closely with NOMS, and all of the changes noted above have been discussed with them. We continue to provide support for ACCT training processes and support the prison in managing the prison-led ACCT process. CNWL staff actively check each day that relevant information has been appropriately shared and that we review ACCTs at each planned review meeting. We have audited our record keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure that risk related information is both appropriately recorded and shared. This monitoring will be on-going in HMP Woodhill and in our other services. We have discussed with the Prison Governor and the NOMS the use of ‘safer cells’ (where all ligature points have been removed) but we understand that there are no safer cells within HMP Woodhill at this time.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit and continue monitoring record-keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure risk information is recorded and shared.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We continue to work closely with NOMS, and all of the changes noted above have been discussed with them. We continue to provide support for ACCT training processes and support the prison in managing the prison-led ACCT process. CNWL staff actively check each day that relevant information has been appropriately shared and that we review ACCTs at each planned review meeting. We have audited our record keeping for staff attending ACCT reviews to ensure that risk related information is both appropriately recorded and shared. This monitoring will be on-going in HMP Woodhill and in our other services. We have discussed with the Prison Governor and the NOMS the use of ‘safer cells’ (where all ligature points have been removed) but we understand that there are no safer cells within HMP Woodhill at this time.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a comprehensive independent review of safer custody procedures and prison-wide factors affecting prisoner wellbeing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You have identified that the PPO has made repeat recommendations and that there is need for a comprehensive review of the safer custody procedures.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response2
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct an independent review of healthcare services, including mental health and substance misuse provision, alongside the safer custody review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the recent deaths in custody at HMP Woodhill, reviews of all aspects of safer custody, and of healthcare services have been commissioned. These reviews are being conducted by staff who are not based in the prison, and the results will inform future developments.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response2
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Entry to Custody Risk Assessment process through staged reception and first-night screening, including multi-agency review and incorporation into local policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You may be interested to know that in order to address the issues with reception screening that were identified in the case of Daniel Byrne a new tool is being introduced.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response2
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NOMS holds policy responsibility for suicide prevention and self-harm management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You stated that “there needs to be a review of the healthcare staff’s role in carrying out a full and adequate risk assessment of suicide and self-harm whenever a new prisoner is seen and assessed by healthcare”. In addition, that “consideration should be given to the introduction of a formal risk assessment tool”. We note that you raised similar concerns in Regulation 28 reports in 2014 and have considered the NOMS responses of 12 June and 31 October 2014. We note that the Equality, Rights and Decency Group of NOMS has policy responsibility for suicide prevention and self-harm management and will not repeat the description of the policy frameworks set out in the responses. We do however operate under the national frameworks set out in Prison Service Instructions (PSI) 74/2011 Early Days in”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The prison leads the ACCT process and is responsible for regularly assessing prisoners’ risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It was also recognised that whilst those with complex Mental Health needs are ‘managed well’ there is very little resource available for those inmates who are primarily being supported by GPs. This will be picked up in the benchmarking exercise. There were a number of other recommendations including the need to regularly review and focus on the ACCT process recognising the importance of the prison risk assessing regularly and the quality and organisation of the process.”

    Source location

    Daniel-Byrne-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 December 2015

    Open published response
  6. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Samuel William Gale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Samuel William Gale, aged 18, was received into custody at HMP Doncaster after recent self-harm and a suicide attempt, and was placed on an ACCT with half-hourly observations. The ACCT was closed on 16 May 2014, and he was found hanging the following day; the report raised concern that it was closed without reference to healthcare, chaplaincy, a unit manager, or an officer who had carried out an ACCT review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consult relevant healthcare, chaplaincy, unit management or ACCT review officers before closing an ACCT

    Wider context from the report

    “i) The ACCT was closed by a person who had previous dealings with Samuel without reference to healthcare, the chaplaincy or a unit manager or any officer who had carried out an ACCT review. ii) The Deputy Director was asked to consider whether only the person who is primarily responsible for a prisoner’s ACCT should be the one to close it. ”

    Source location

    Samuel William Gale · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limiting ACCT closure to the primarily responsible person may reduce scrutiny and support in ways detrimental to prisoner wellbeing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “d) It would be impractical to implement a process whereby only the person who is primarily responsible for a prisoner’s ACCT should be the one to close it. Such action may leave a prisoner under a level of scrutiny and support that is not conducive to a prisoner’s ongoing wellbeing.”

    Source location

    2015-0454-Response-by-Serco
    Page 1 · response
    Published 23 October 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Staff sickness, annual leave and lost days make limiting ACCT closure to the primarily responsible person impractical.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Staff sickness, annual leave and lost days also render this impractical. Notwithstanding this, HMP & YOI Doncaster will seek to move to a case management model during 2016 whereby a nominated case manager manages a case load so that continuity of care is improved resulting in case reviews being completed by the same manager on a more frequent basis. The timing for completion of this objective is by June 2016.”

    Source location

    2015-0454-Response-by-Serco
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 October 2015

    Open published response
  7. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Liam SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Liam Smith was admitted to HMP Hewell on 7 August 2014 and died after taking a combination of prescribed and illicitly obtained medication in his cell. The concerns included possible failures to follow mandatory ACCT procedures, inadequate dissemination and recording of medical information, and limited healthcare interaction with high-risk drug users, potentially resulting in warning signs being missed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to follow mandatory ACCT procedures for prisoners at risk of self-harm

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Evidence suggested that Mr Smith was at risk of inadvertant self harm and that therefore in accordance with PSI64/2011 ACCT procedures should have been opened in respect of him. Witnesses confirmed their understanding of that mandatory requirement but indicated that they would use their clinical judgement in deciding whether or not to open an ACCT. It is of concern that staff may therefore may therefore not be following mandatory PSI instructions and that prisoners are not receiving appropriate protection by way of the ACCT process. ”

    Source location

    Liam SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the ACCT process to inform changes to PSI 64/2011.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A review of the ACCT process is currently ongoing, which will inform changes to the current policy in PSI 64/2011.”

    Source location

    2015-0382-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    ACCT procedures do not require automatic opening whenever risk may be indicated; staff must assess risk, consult appropriately and record their decision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you are aware, chapter 5 of Prison Service Instruction (PSI) 64/2011 sets out the policy on the Assessment, Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) process. ACCT is a prisoner-centred, flexible care planning approach which is used in all prisons to manage a prisoner's risk or self-harm or suicide.”

    Source location

    2015-0382-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 September 2015

    Open published response
  8. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew Douglas Frere · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Frere self-harmed while imprisoned at HMP Moorland and was managed under the ACCT procedure. He died on 10 February 2014 after suspending himself by a ligature formed from a bedsheet in his cell. Concerns were raised about failure to follow, or closely approximate, the requirement for regular medical review during continuous observation, and about ACCT reviewers not being specifically instructed to read recent ongoing observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that ACCT review attendees read recent ongoing observations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The PSI does not appear to include any specific instruction that the case manager, or others attending ACCT review, should ensure that they read the ongoing observations, at least as far back as the previous review, in order to ensure that they are aware of recent events when they carry out such a review. My concern is that potentially important information, which might affect decisions taken at the review, may be missed if the recent observations are not read. ”

    Source location

    Andrew Douglas Frere · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Warren Martin Sampson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Warren Martin Sampson had been remanded to HM Prison Chelmsford and was subject to an ACCT when he was found hanging in his cell. Concerns included inconsistent attendance and recording at ACCT reviews, no process for following up non-attendance at first-night healthcare screening, and no system ensuring officers were familiar with local directives and instructions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ad hoc attendance of representatives from all disciplines, especially Healthcare, at ACCT reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The “ad hoc” attendance at ACCT reviews of representatives from all disciplines especially Healthcare. The lack of written evidence within the ACCT documentation of contributory input from other agencies such as Healthcare. ”

    Source location

    Warren Martin Sampson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of written evidence of contributory input from other agencies in ACCT documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The “ad hoc” attendance at ACCT reviews of representatives from all disciplines especially Healthcare. The lack of written evidence within the ACCT documentation of contributory input from other agencies such as Healthcare. ”

    Source location

    Warren Martin Sampson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require daily email invitations to healthcare professionals for ACCT reviews and record their attendance or other input in ACCT documentation and SystmOne.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is the process now that discipline staff each day will email healthcare with the ACCT reviews they are intending to hold that day and invite the appropriate healthcare professional to input into the process, whether it be primary healthcare, mental health or a member of the substance misuse team. Attendance will be in person where possible but where a healthcare professional is unable to attend, the input of healthcare, for example, by telephone, must be recorded on the ACCT document and in SystmOne. This has been reaffirmed to healthcare staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Care UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 September 2016

    Open published response
  10. Exeter and Greater Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Carl David Roy SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl David Roy SMITH was found unconscious and without signs of life in his cell at HMP Exeter on 22 November 2012, after being held on remand and receiving medication for seizures and detoxification. His death was concluded to be drug-related, involving methadone toxicity and illicitly obtained methadone. The report identified insufficient custodial and welfare checks and deficient information sharing about those checks for a prisoner on an ACCT and Methadone Stabilisation Programme.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient custodial and welfare checks for prisoners on an ACCT and Methadone Stabilisation Programme

    Wider context from the report

    “The quality of custodial and welfare checks were insufficient for a prisoner on an ACCT and Methadone Stabilisation Programme and information sharing in relation to the checks made, appeared to be deficient. ”

    Source location

    Carl David Roy SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review patients on drug treatment programmes jointly with prison staff, agree observation arrangements, and share caseload information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5.5. Concern 1 - To review the systems for Information Sharing reference those on drug treatments stabilisation programmes for Substance Misuse IDTS with Prison Officers so that all Prison Officers are aware of Prisoners concerned.”

    Source location

    2015-0298-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a robust system for monitoring patients arriving at HMP Exeter who require night welfare checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6.1. In addition to the Coroners Ruling noted in this report the Trust has introduced a robust system for the monitoring of patients arriving at HMP Exeter and requiring Night Welfare Checks (see appendix 5). This guidance was developed jointly with Public Health England (NTA), HMP Exeter National Offender Management Service and will be approved by NHS England at the Devon Prison Partnership Board in October 2015.”

    Source location

    2015-0298-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 24 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The action plan addressed identified care issues, with ongoing compliance audit and executive review providing sufficient assurance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5.1. The Trust recognises that there were failings in relation to Mr Smith’s care, and agrees with both the PPO and HM Coroners view that these issues are of concern. In order to ensure that these issues do not reoccur within the Trust services, an action plan was put into place at the time of receipt of the PPO report into Mr Smith’s death, as the Trust was not the provider at the time of Mr Smith’s death. This action plan assured the Trust that actions taken by the provider at the time of Mr Smith’s death addressed the issues outlined.”

    Source location

    2015-0298-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NOMS at HMP Exeter is responsible for training and auditing operation of the ACCT document system.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5.7. Concern 3- To review training and audit the operation of the ACCT document system so that it is made as robust as possible.”

    Source location

    2015-0298-Response-by-Dorset-Health-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 24 July 2015

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026