Recurring concern

Unreliable ACCT suicide and self-harm prevention processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 16 Sep 2013•Latest report 29 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes deficiencies in controls dedicated to the ACCT process, including quality assurance, observations, reviews, documentation, information sharing, staffing or training, where the failure undermines reliable ACCT risk prevention or management.

Not included

  • Excludes generic organisational quality assurance, staffing or training failures that are not explicitly tied to ACCT.
  • Excludes unrelated prison, healthcare or mental-health processes that do not form part of ACCT.
  • Excludes outcomes, individual clinical judgments or underlying causes unless the assertion identifies a failure of an ACCT control.
Reports
92

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
184

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
276

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

HM Prison and Probation Service41
Ministry of Justice27
NHS England15
Care UK6
Department of Health and Social Care6
HM Prison Service6
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust5
Hewell Prison5
Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust5
HM Inspectorate of Prisons4
Practice Plus Group4
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Birmingham Prison3
G4S3
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Yasmin Louise ADAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Yasmin Louise ADAMS, who had emotionally unstable personality disorder and a history of self-harm, was found suspended and unconscious in her prison cell on 12 November 2016 and died in hospital the next day. Concerns included a 29-minute gap in observation checks, fixed shower rails presenting ligature risks, uncertainty about staff training on personality disorder and learning disability, and the use of cellular confinement for a prisoner on an ACCT.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of ACCT observation scheduling to avoid overly long gaps

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Immediately prior to Yasmin’s death there had been a gap of twenty-nine minutes in her ACCT observations and at the time she was subject to four checks per hour. The relevant guidance for ACCT observation checks understandably states that the checks should not take place at set time to lessen the chances of a prisoner being able to predict when observations will occur, but the guidance does not advise avoiding overly long gaps between observation (e.g. twenty-nine minutes as in Yasmin’s case). ”

    Source location

    Yasmin Louise ADAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use appropriate cells for ACCT prisoners subject to cellular confinement

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Yasmin was subject to cellular confinement on a residential prison wing. ‘Normal’ or ‘standard’ cells may not be best for cellular confinement, particularly for a prisoner placed on an ACCT and therefore deemed at risk and vulnerable, due to cell environment and ligature points and less ability to check and observe by prison staff. It is unclear whether appropriate cells are now used for placement of prisoners subject to ACCTS who are also subject to cellular confinement, across the prison estate. ”

    Source location

    Yasmin Louise ADAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement ACCT version 6 to support person-centred, multidisciplinary case management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In April 2021, as part of a wider organisational change, HMP Foston Hall implemented ACCT version 6. The new version of the ACCT document was developed following a review of the previous version, and is designed to encourage a person-centred and multidisciplinary case management approach. In addition to the introduction of the new document, guidance documents that focus on various aspects including the ongoing record were produced to assist staff in conducting their duties. The ongoing record guidance clearly explains that observations should not be predictable but should be completed within a reasonable time frame to ensure there are not long gaps between checks and provides examples of such.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce guidance on ACCT ongoing records and observation timing to support staff in completing checks safely.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In April 2021, as part of a wider organisational change, HMP Foston Hall implemented ACCT version 6. The new version of the ACCT document was developed following a review of the previous version, and is designed to encourage a person-centred and multidisciplinary case management approach. In addition to the introduction of the new document, guidance documents that focus on various aspects including the ongoing record were produced to assist staff in conducting their duties. The ongoing record guidance clearly explains that observations should not be predictable but should be completed within a reasonable time frame to ensure there are not long gaps between checks and provides examples of such.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Convert cells in older prisons to ligature-resistant standards through the estate-wide programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A ligature-resistant (LR) cell is one from which as many ligature points as possible have been removed, through the design and installation of furniture and fittings. This includes the door and window, electrical, heating and sanitary fittings, and other features such as shower curtain rails. Our long-term aim is to ensure that LR cells are available as an option for staff managing prisoners in crisis, and that they retain those features in full working order and do not deviate from the standard over time. All new prisons and major additions, such as new wings, are usually”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cellular confinement does not itself require a specialist cell because not all prisoners undergoing it are at risk of self-harm.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Cellular confinement is essentially the same process as segregation, except that it does not involve moving the prisoner to a dedicated segregation area. It does not of itself require a specialist cell, since not all prisoners undergoing cellular confinement will be at risk of self-harm. If that risk exists and it includes an increased risk of ligaturing, the prisoner can be moved to an LR cell where one is available. An alternative is a move to the segregation area, however this must be the exception for prisoners being supported through ACCT; and as segregation units are not required to have any LR accommodation, this may not be suitable.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 June 2024

    Open published response
  2. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Frazer Charlie Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Frazer Charlie Williams was found deceased on 7 March 2022 in his cell at HMP Guys Marsh, suspended by a ligature. The report identifies concerns about delays transferring prisoners requiring mental health hospital care, inadequate arrangements for managing self-neglect and healthcare handovers, shortcomings in ACCT monitoring and reviews, and other prison care and safety processes. The inquest concluded that he died by suicide in circumstances where there was inadequate assessment and monitoring of his risks of self-harm and suicide prior to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of automatic flagging of missed ACCT reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “viii. There is lack of automatic flagging of a missed ACCT review at HMP Guys Marsh and this could also be a national problem. ”

    Source location

    Frazer Charlie Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of ACCT quality assurance between day 7 and post-closure review

    Wider context from the report

    “vii. The lack of ACCT quality assurance, or audit, between day 7 of the ACCT and the post closure review. ”

    Source location

    Frazer Charlie Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to invite relevant individuals such as key workers to ACCT reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “ix. Relevant individuals, such as key workers are not being invited to attend ACCT reviews at HMP Guys Marsh in line with ACCT 6 guidance. ”

    Source location

    Frazer Charlie Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share ACCT process concerns with regional commissioners and request monitoring through contract reviews and feedback to the Health and Justice Oversight Delivery Group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “7. The lack of Assessment Care in Custody and Teamwork (ACCT) quality assurance or audit between day 7 of the ACCT and post closure review.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct weekly ACCT completion checks and monthly regional ACCT summaries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Custodial Manager within the Safety function is responsible for ensuring that ACCTs are completed and a weekly basis. The Regional team also attend GM monthly and undertake ACCT summary.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS / HMP Guys Marsh
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enable Band 3 officers to attend ACCT reviews from October 2024.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We facilitate MDT reviews; however, due to current Staffing levels, Band 3 Officers are unable to attend ACCT reviews. This will be corrected from October 2024 onwards.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS / HMP Guys Marsh
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Other report recipients are responsible for addressing prison healthcare guidance, ACCT operations and family engagement because these concern day-to-day prison operations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regard to the other concerns you have raised around a lack of national guidance relating to a range of healthcare issues in prison settings; operational issues regarding the ACCT process and engagement with prisoners’ family members, I would expect the other recipients of your report to address these in their responses, as they are responsible for matters relating to day to day operations within prison settings. I look forward to seeing their responses and working with them where appropriate, to avoid a repetition of the horrific events of this case.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    HMPPS is responsible for overseeing the ACCT process, including establishment-level training, and is responding independently to ACCT concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The points above relating to the ACCT process (annex-to-psi-64-2011-acct .docx (live.com)) will be shared with NHS England’s regional Health and Justice commissioners, with a request that they monitor this in contract review meetings and feedback via the Health and Justice Oversight Delivery Group (HJODOG).”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Current staffing levels prevent Band 3 officers from attending ACCT reviews until October 2024.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ix. Relevant individuals, such as key workers are not being invited to attend ACCT reviews at HMP Guys Marsh in line with ACCT 6 guidance.”

    Source location

    Response from HMPPS / HMP Guys Marsh
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response
  3. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Kane Christopher Boyce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kane Christopher Boyce, a serving prisoner at HMP Lowdham Grange, was found with a ligature around his neck on 3 October 2021 and could not be resuscitated. The jury found that alcohol intoxication and the failure of staff to share information, open an under-the-influence log, adequately monitor him, and consider risk when isolating cell power and ignoring cell bells contributed to his death. The report raised concerns about these practices, staff understanding of relevant policies, learning from deaths in custody, and organisational candour.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of understanding and training on key dates or anniversaries as self-harm risk factors

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Lack of understanding of Prison Service Instruction 64/2011, and possible discord between local policy and the PSI A number of prison officers believed Kane’s birthday was incapable of amounting to a “key date or anniversary” for the purposes of PSI 64/2011. It seems to me to common sense that a birthday, being the anniversary of one’s birth, could amount to a potential trigger date for heightened emotions when considering a prisoner’s risk of self harm and suicide. That is not to say it would be so for each and every prisoner, but perhaps something to be cognisant of when dealing with an emotional and intoxicated prisoner. I have seen no evidence that this is covered in Sodexo’s training for staff on the ACCT process, if indeed any series of training exists. A number of prison officers gave evidence that an ACCT was not necessary because Kane had not said to anyone that he was going to harm himself (either fatally or otherwise). Serco’s Safer Prison Operating Policy (August 2022) is confusing on this point and seems to suggest at paragraph 3.4 that staff should only open an ACCT when a statement of self-harm has been verbalised. This is not consistent with the PSI. Sodexo have not offered for scrutiny any local policy, guidance or training material on the threshold for opening an ACCT, but even if such exists, it appears some staff continue to labour under the misapprehension that a prisoner must say they are thinking of harming themselves before an ACCT can be opened. ”

    Source location

    Kane Christopher Boyce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise the ACCT threshold without a verbalised self-harm statement

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Lack of understanding of Prison Service Instruction 64/2011, and possible discord between local policy and the PSI A number of prison officers believed Kane’s birthday was incapable of amounting to a “key date or anniversary” for the purposes of PSI 64/2011. It seems to me to common sense that a birthday, being the anniversary of one’s birth, could amount to a potential trigger date for heightened emotions when considering a prisoner’s risk of self harm and suicide. That is not to say it would be so for each and every prisoner, but perhaps something to be cognisant of when dealing with an emotional and intoxicated prisoner. I have seen no evidence that this is covered in Sodexo’s training for staff on the ACCT process, if indeed any series of training exists. A number of prison officers gave evidence that an ACCT was not necessary because Kane had not said to anyone that he was going to harm himself (either fatally or otherwise). Serco’s Safer Prison Operating Policy (August 2022) is confusing on this point and seems to suggest at paragraph 3.4 that staff should only open an ACCT when a statement of self-harm has been verbalised. This is not consistent with the PSI. Sodexo have not offered for scrutiny any local policy, guidance or training material on the threshold for opening an ACCT, but even if such exists, it appears some staff continue to labour under the misapprehension that a prisoner must say they are thinking of harming themselves before an ACCT can be opened. ”

    Source location

    Kane Christopher Boyce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver the national ACCT, ACCT Assessor and Case Coordinator training packages using nationally trained Sodexo facilitators and HMPPS facilitators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Sodexo follow the national Prison Service Instruction 64/2011 which provides the framework underpinning any local policy. Sodexo deliver to staff the national training package issued by HMPPS for ACCT, version 6 and ACCT Assessor. To enable this Sodexo facilitators complete the national ACCT Train the Trainer course delivered by HMPPS facilitators. Relevant Sodexo staff also receive the national training package delivered directly by HMPPS facilitators on ACCT Case Coordinators.”

    Source location

    Response from Sodexo
    Page 3 · response
    Published 25 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ACCT refresher training to all staff when operational management returns to Sodexo, unless they have completed it earlier.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “When the operational management of the prison returns to Sodexo all staff will undergo ACCT refresher training, if not done before.”

    Source location

    Response from Sodexo
    Page 3 · response
    Published 25 January 2024

    Open published response
  4. Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

    AI-generated summary

    Martin Samuel WILLIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Samuel Willis was a serving prisoner at HMP Stoke Heath when he was found hanging in his cell on 15 September 2022. He was on the suicide and self-harm prevention scheme, but concerns included failures in observation recording and supervision, uncertainty about the appropriate observation level and possible transfer for mental health treatment, and the need for a collective review of the care provided.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to carry out scheduled ACCT observations

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The ACCT procedure was not properly implemented, complied with or supervised. A scheduled observation at 8 am did not take place and a false entry was entered at 7:30 am and later deleted. The last correct entry was at 7 am with earlier omissions. ”

    Source location

    Martin Samuel WILLIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Present an operational briefing to all staff on assigned ACCT-check responsibilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ACTION TO BE TAKEN: I will be presenting an Operational Briefing on 21st December to all staff, taking into consideration the Governors Order GO 01/2023 which reads as follows:”

    Source location

    2024-0171 - Response from HMPPS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incorporate the Governors Order on ACCT checks into ACCT V6 training delivered to staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This Governors Order will also be incorporated into all ACCT V6 training which is delivered to all staff by our Regional Safety Team and inhouse trainers.”

    Source location

    2024-0171 - Response from HMPPS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require Supervising Officers to complete daily checks and challenge staff where necessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Supervising Officers will ensure the daily checks are completed and staff challenged accordingly.”

    Source location

    2024-0171 - Response from HMPPS
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require staff working at HMP YOI Stoke Heath to complete suicide prevention and ACCT training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action 2. All Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust staff working in HMP YOI Stoke Heath are required to complete suicide prevention training and also the ACCT training provided by HMP YOI Stoke Heath. Completion timescale July 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership University
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Senior Officers and Custodial Managers are not responsible for allocating ACCT checks; responsibility is assigned to designated operational staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The purpose of this Governors Orders is to make you aware that it is the responsibility of the Cleaning Officer to ensure that ACCT observations and conversations are conducted and recorded in the ACCT document between the hours of 0745 - 1715.”

    Source location

    2024-0171 - Response from HMPPS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 April 2024

    Open published response
  5. Exeter and Greater Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Stewart Stanley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stewart Stanley was remanded in custody at HMP Exeter and was found hanging in his cell on 12 July 2020 after the level of his observation had been reduced. He was taken to hospital and died on 14 July 2020. The concerns included inconsistent approaches to conducting and recording ACCT observations, differing interpretations of observation requirements, inaccurate recording of observation times, and evidence of excessive staff working hours. The inquest jury concluded that his death was probably caused or contributed to by failures to follow processes, including excluding the staff best qualified to assess his risk from the decision to remove him from constant watch.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistent conducting of ACCT observations

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The evidence revealed that there was an inconsistent approach taken by staff when conducting and recording observations on prisoners subject to the Prison Service suicide and self-harm prevention procedures (known as ACCT). (2) The evidence also revealed that some Officers had a different interpretation of the requirements of set out in PSI 64/2011 in respect of the timing of observations. (3) The evidence also revealed that precise times of such observations were not routinely being recorded accurately. (4) During the evidence it became apparent that a prison officer worked 23 hours out of 24, he was asked if this was normal and he replied, “yes, to make the regime work.” ”

    Source location

    Stewart Stanley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Different staff interpretations of ACCT observation timing requirements

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The evidence revealed that there was an inconsistent approach taken by staff when conducting and recording observations on prisoners subject to the Prison Service suicide and self-harm prevention procedures (known as ACCT). (2) The evidence also revealed that some Officers had a different interpretation of the requirements of set out in PSI 64/2011 in respect of the timing of observations. (3) The evidence also revealed that precise times of such observations were not routinely being recorded accurately. (4) During the evidence it became apparent that a prison officer worked 23 hours out of 24, he was asked if this was normal and he replied, “yes, to make the regime work.” ”

    Source location

    Stewart Stanley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately record ACCT observation times

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The evidence revealed that there was an inconsistent approach taken by staff when conducting and recording observations on prisoners subject to the Prison Service suicide and self-harm prevention procedures (known as ACCT). (2) The evidence also revealed that some Officers had a different interpretation of the requirements of set out in PSI 64/2011 in respect of the timing of observations. (3) The evidence also revealed that precise times of such observations were not routinely being recorded accurately. (4) During the evidence it became apparent that a prison officer worked 23 hours out of 24, he was asked if this was normal and he replied, “yes, to make the regime work.” ”

    Source location

    Stewart Stanley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an ACCT assurance procedure with supervising-officer allocation, daily observation checks and escalation of discrepancies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HMP Exeter have reviewed the management of the ACCT process and have introduced an assurance procedure to ensure there is consistency and effective completion of all ACCT documents including observations. All ACCT are now allocated to a supervising officer who is responsible for conducting daily checks to ensure all set observations for the previous 24 hours have been completed. Any discrepancies are highlighted with the safety team for prompt action.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide two ACCT safety Floorwalkers to deliver regular staff upskilling on accurate observation completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since February 2023, the Prison Performance Support Programme (PPSP) have provided funding for 12 months for two Band 4 ACCT safety ‘Floorwalkers’ who are responsible for conducting regular upskilling sessions which include the need for accurate completion of observations. Further to this, ACCT V6 observation posters have been displayed in all wing offices and guides have been produced for staff.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display ACCT V6 observation posters in wing offices and produce staff guides.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since February 2023, the Prison Performance Support Programme (PPSP) have provided funding for 12 months for two Band 4 ACCT safety ‘Floorwalkers’ who are responsible for conducting regular upskilling sessions which include the need for accurate completion of observations. Further to this, ACCT V6 observation posters have been displayed in all wing offices and guides have been produced for staff.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2023

    Open published response
  6. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Stuart Michael ROBINSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stuart Michael Robinson, aged 20, died by suicide in prison on 25 April 2021 after a history of attempted suicide and self-harm. The inquest highlighted the need for a registered mental health nurse or other mental health expert to attend reviews for prisoners subject to ACCT procedures, particularly where there had been repeated self-harm.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure mental health team attendance at ACCT reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “This inquest highlighted the significant numbers of prisoners who enter the prison system with known or undiagnosed mental health issues. Whilst ACCT 6 requires multidisciplinary attendance at review meetings, this case highlighted the need for specific attendance of an RMN or other mental health expert at any review, (Mr Robinson had repeatedly self harmed prior to committing suicide but had presented without concern at each review which had been carried out without any input from the mental health team). The prison in question now operates a local policy to ensure someone from the mental health team attends all ACCT reviews irrespective of other disciplines attending. This has enabled the prison to identify issues which may not be picked up by other professionals involved, to enable support to be put in place by way of separate care plans which has had a notable impact upon SASH in the prison. ”

    Source location

    Stuart Michael ROBINSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing multidisciplinary ACCT arrangements, including healthcare involvement based on individual need, are considered sufficient; universal mental health nurse attendance is not required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The emphasis on multi-disciplinary working ensures that any staff who can contribute to supporting the individual will be invited to be part of the ACCT case review team. Depending on the individual’s need, this may include a range of staff members from across the prison such as key workers, chaplaincy, substance misuse, psychology, and wing staff, as well as mental health professionals.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison & Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2023

    Open published response
  7. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Thomas Victor HUNTLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Thomas Victor Huntley died in HMP Winchester after he was found unresponsive in his cell on 28 May 2020, following a planned act intended to end his life. The inquest identified concerns about missing and inadequately recorded risk information, failures in ACCT documentation and risk assessment, inadequate observations, information sharing between prison and healthcare staff, and ligature risks in cells.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of ACCT audits to identify inadequate document completion

    Wider context from the report

    “The second relates to the quality and effectiveness of ACCT audits. We heard evidence that ACCT documents are reviewed annually. The case manager mentioned above advised that he had not received any adverse feedback about the quality of his ACCT documents and no issues with them had been identified. Given the inadequate nature of the ACCT document opened on Mr Huntley and apparent lack of understanding about completing the documents the quality of the audits is brought into question. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Victor HUNTLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide adequate ACCT training and refresher training for all relevant staff

    Wider context from the report

    “This leads me to have 2 concerns: The first regards the provision and quality of ACCT training and refresher training given this evidence was given some 2 years after the death of Mr Huntley and well after the disruptions brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic. I also heard evidence that despite an ACCT being a ‘whole prison’ document (which can and should be opened by any member of staff) training was not mandatory for non-security staff. In 2019 there was no joint training for prison and healthcare staff on the use of ACCT documents. I am informed by CNWL that under ACCT v6 (which has been in force since July 2021) joint training is provided and for this is reassuring. However I understand that the frequency of this training is determined in relation to operational capacity at individual establishment level. This is of concern given the evidence from witnesses at this inquest some 20 months after this version came into force. ”

    Source location

    Thomas Victor HUNTLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate an accountability system for ACCT quality assurance, feeding findings back to staff and rectifying serious concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “assurance checks take place at three main stages. The first takes place within 48 hours from the opening of the ACCT, conducted by the Safety Team, assessing the effectiveness of the immediate steps taken and quality of the documentation. The second check is by the Custodial Manager who checks the ongoing record and the case reviews, ensuring that entries are detailed and meaningful, and whether previously identified actions or identified concerns continue to be taken into account and built on. Following ACCT closure, the Safety Team then review the full ACCT document including the seven day post closure monitoring procedure and the post closure reviews.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver monthly ACCT v6 and SASH training and awareness sessions, supported by a monitored staff training plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is essential that ACCT Version 6 (v6) procedures are understood and undertaken by all members of staff working within prisons, including healthcare colleagues, and that staff feel confident in recognising an increase in risk and are aware of the need to record all required information within the ACCT document, including any triggers. ACCT v6 and SASH training includes guidance on understanding and assessing the risks and triggers of self-harm, the ACCT process and supporting individuals who self-harm while they are subject to monitoring.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response
  8. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Jai SINGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jai Singh died at City Hospital on 28 January 2022 after being found in cardiac arrest in his cell at HMP Birmingham, having asphyxiated after placing a bag over his head. The report identifies repeated failures to communicate and record family and clinical concerns, use interpreters, assess risk, operate the ACCT process, and provide appropriate mental-health admission and transfer. It also identifies ongoing risks from the absence of a psychiatrist in the prison mental-health MDT and the lack of ongoing risk-assessment documentation in SystemOne.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failings in use of the ACCT system

    Wider context from the report

    “1. A multitude of factors contributed to Mr. Singh's death across the custodial and healthcare teams within HMP Birmingham. Many steps have been taken by all organisations with responsibility for Mr. Singh's safety and health during his time at HMP Birmingham to rectify failings that have been identified such as the consistent failure to use interpreters, poor communication and record keeping within and between teams, the absence of meaningful engagement with Mr. Singh's family, insufficient consideration of family concerns and failings in the use of the ACCT system. ”

    Source location

    Jai SINGH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew Paul SHIRLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Paul Shirley, a 25-year-old prisoner at HMP Hewell, was found unresponsive in his cell on 23 March 2021, suspended by a ligature, and was pronounced dead at the scene. The inquest found that healthcare and mental healthcare staff failed to sufficiently identify, manage, and share information about his risk of suicide and self-harm, and that these failures probably caused or contributed to his death. Concerns were also raised about staff training on suicide and self-harm risk and the Initial Segregation Health Screen process.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure staff completion of ACCT v.6 and SASH model 3 training

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) I heard evidence that v.6 of the ACCT document had been in place at prisons throughout England and Wales since June 2021, and that training relevant thereto consists of: (i) ACCT v.6 training; and (ii) SASH (suicide and self-harm) model 3 training. However, I also heard that, as at 20.1.23 (over 18 months after the introduction of the latest ACCT document), 280 out of 400 members of staff at the prison (70%) were yet to have completed that training. It is of considerable concern that such a high percentage of staff at the prison may not be in a position to recognise the risk which a prisoner presents of suicide and/or self-harm, and therefore to take appropriate steps to reduce that risk; ”

    Source location

    Andrew Paul SHIRLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require managers or supervisors to sign off staff understanding of the ACCT process during prison induction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ACCT training is provided by the Prison and it is expected that all MPFT Prison staff attend this training as part of their Induction. Attendance at ACCT training is recorded and monitored locally.”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate ACCT process guidance through the Inclusion prison guide and internal team, MPCC and ACCT meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As well as attendance at the training all MPFT staff are given a copy of the Inclusion Good Practice Guide to working in Prisons which includes information on ACCT processes. The use and function of the ACCT process is discussed in internal team meetings, MPCC meetings and in specific ACCT meetings so new staff get the chance to familiarise themselves with how an ACCT is used.”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Achieve full compliance with mandatory clinical risk-management training for HMP Hewell mental-health staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Suicide and Self harm Training”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out the three-level suicide mitigation training programme through induction and monitor completion using the Electronic Staff Record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In February 2023 MPFT launched a three level Suicide Mitigation Training which is detailed below. This will be part of the Prison Induction process and will be in place of the current two day training module.”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver combined ACCT v6 and SASH training to all prison staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is essential that ACCT procedures are utilised by all members of staff working within prisons, including healthcare colleagues, and that staff feel confident in recognising risk and in making the decision to open an ACCT in order to support prisoners when it is needed. ACCT v6 and SASH training includes guidance on understanding and assessing the risks and triggers of self-harm, the ACCT v6 process and supporting individuals who self-harm while they are under ACCT monitoring and during the post closure period. HMP Hewell is currently delivering training sessions that incorporate both ACCT v6 and SASH training to all staff with the expectation that this will be completed by July 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train healthcare staff to deliver and complete ACCT training at HMP Hewell, reducing reliance on prison-led provision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In a new joint collaborative initiative between our prison colleagues, Practice Plus Group and the Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (MPFT), a cohort of healthcare staff have been identified to be trained to deliver the ACCT training. This will significantly improve our ability to”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement national clinical induction covering foundation ACCT training before prison employment, followed by full ACCT training within six months.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above, and to provide further assurance, Practice Plus Group’s Health in Justice service has identified clinical induction as one of its three top corporate priorities this year. A new national clinical induction is being developed, which will incorporate foundation training in the ACCT process, ensuring that all staff receive this prior to commencing work in prison. This will serve as an introduction to the full ACCT training, which will be delivered within the first six months of employment, once our healthcare professionals have acquired practical and contextual experience to support this. It is intended that the Clinical Induction will have an implementation date of no later than 1 October 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce ACCT and SASH refresher training every two years after initial training, with completion monitored through the Learning Management System.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There are no requirements or national standards in regards to ACCT and SASH refresher training. However, to further embed understanding of the ACCT process, Practice Plus Group will introduce a refresher training session to be completed at 2 yearly intervals following completion of initial training. This will be monitored on an ongoing basis via our organisational Learning Management System (LMS).”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Prison provides ACCT training, while attendance by mental healthcare staff is expected and locally monitored.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ACCT training is provided by the Prison and it is expected that all MPFT Prison staff attend this training as part of their Induction. Attendance at ACCT training is recorded and monitored locally.”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The prison governs the ACCT process and had responsibility for running the required training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response: The ACCT process is governed by the prison and to date Practice Plus Group have been reliant upon the prison to run the training required. Training on ACCT and SASH (suicide and self-harm) are done together as part of the same sessions.”

    Source location

    Response from Practice Plus Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 February 2023

    Open published response
  10. Swansea and Neath Port Talbot

    AI-generated summary

    Khalid Abiaz · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Khalid Abiaz, a prisoner at HMP Swansea, died in the early hours of 13 September 2016 after being found suspended by a ligature. The report identified concerns that an ACCT was not opened despite suicide warning markers and relevant historical information, and that prison and bank nursing staff may not have received sufficiently frequent or up-to-date ACCT training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of regular access to ACCT training for bank nurses

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I heard evidence from the nurse who saw Khalid on reception. This person is an experienced mental health nurse who is now a charge nurse on bank. The nurse told me that he still does at times work through the bank as a mental health nurse in HMP Swansea. At the time of Khalid’s death the Nurse was the mental health nurse working on reception and he completed the first reception health screen for Khalid and he did not open an ACCT. It was unclear what documents the nurse had seen on reception for Khalid but he did not ask prison staff if he could see any documents. The Nurse gave evidence that even if he had known that there was a suicide warning marker on Khalid’s prison escort record this would not have been enough combined with what Khalid said to him to open an ACCT, he relies on Khalid’s presentation. Khalid had been assessed by a consultant psychiatrist as a significant risk to himself a matter of weeks before he was seen by the Nurse in reception. HMP Swansea prison staff and the Nurse were not aware of this information but even if the Nurse had known this information his evidence was that this would not necessarily have been enough for him to open an ACCT, he would consider presentation. The revised ACCT version 6 and accompanying policy guidance set out above makes clear that an ACCT must be opened by any member of staff who receives information that indicates a prisoner may be currently at risk of self-harm or suicide and that this information may come from a prison escort. The answers of the Nurse raise a concern around the level and adequacy of the training on ACCT. The Nurse stated that he has reflected on his practice but that he still places emphasis on what the prisoner says and how they present when considering whether to open an ACCT. I heard evidence that bank nurses were supervised in the prison but that training on ACCT remained the responsibility of HMP Swansea. I am concerned that bank nurse may not receive access to ACCT training including at the required regularity and I am concerned that unless this happens there remains a risk of similar deaths occurring in the future in HMP Swansea ”

    Source location

    Khalid Abiaz · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to apply ACCT opening criteria to information indicating current self-harm or suicide risk

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I heard evidence from the nurse who saw Khalid on reception. This person is an experienced mental health nurse who is now a charge nurse on bank. The nurse told me that he still does at times work through the bank as a mental health nurse in HMP Swansea. At the time of Khalid’s death the Nurse was the mental health nurse working on reception and he completed the first reception health screen for Khalid and he did not open an ACCT. It was unclear what documents the nurse had seen on reception for Khalid but he did not ask prison staff if he could see any documents. The Nurse gave evidence that even if he had known that there was a suicide warning marker on Khalid’s prison escort record this would not have been enough combined with what Khalid said to him to open an ACCT, he relies on Khalid’s presentation. Khalid had been assessed by a consultant psychiatrist as a significant risk to himself a matter of weeks before he was seen by the Nurse in reception. HMP Swansea prison staff and the Nurse were not aware of this information but even if the Nurse had known this information his evidence was that this would not necessarily have been enough for him to open an ACCT, he would consider presentation. The revised ACCT version 6 and accompanying policy guidance set out above makes clear that an ACCT must be opened by any member of staff who receives information that indicates a prisoner may be currently at risk of self-harm or suicide and that this information may come from a prison escort. The answers of the Nurse raise a concern around the level and adequacy of the training on ACCT. The Nurse stated that he has reflected on his practice but that he still places emphasis on what the prisoner says and how they present when considering whether to open an ACCT. I heard evidence that bank nurses were supervised in the prison but that training on ACCT remained the responsibility of HMP Swansea. I am concerned that bank nurse may not receive access to ACCT training including at the required regularity and I am concerned that unless this happens there remains a risk of similar deaths occurring in the future in HMP Swansea ”

    Source location

    Khalid Abiaz · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate frequency and currency of ACCT training for prison officers

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I heard evidence that following a review in 2015 changes to the ACCT document and process were piloted in 10 establishments in 2019 and this included HMP Swansea. As a result a revised ACCT version 6 and accompanying policy guidance was issued. This revised guidance makes clear that an ACCT must be opened by any member of staff who receives information that indicates a prisoner may be currently at risk of self-harm or suicide and that this information may come from a prison escort. However, this requirement is not new. It was clear in my view from the HMP Swansea Suicide and Prevention Policy that was in place at the time of Khalid’s death that a warning marker for suicide on a prison escort record (‘PER’) should result in the opening of an ACCT. The prison officer who saw Khalid first in reception gave evidence that he was an experienced prison officer with over 20 years-experience of working in prisons including 18 years at HMP Swansea. At the time when Khalid came into custody he was an ACCT assessor and remains in this role. He saw Khalid’s PER which stated that Khalid had recently made threats to kill himself and was alleging mental health issues and he saw the NOEMIS transfer report which contained reference to historic ACCTs that Khalid had been in custody and an act of cutting and ligaturing by Khalid 9 months before in December 2015. He did not open an ACCT but referred the nurse who also did not open an ACCT. In his evidence the Prison Officer stated that if a prisoner came into custody now in 2022 with a warning on his PER stating that he has recently made threats to kill himself then this would not be enough to trigger the opening of an ACCT. This view is inconsistent with the mandatory revised ACCT policy guidance that I have set out above. This indicates that the system for training on ACCT in HMP Swansea is inadequate. The Prison Officer could not recall whether his ACCT training was up to date. His training records show that he was ACCT trained in 2005, 2008, 2011 and 2014 and I am told there was training on the new ACCT document that is not recorded in the training records and a further up-skilling session with staff date not specified. I did hear that training was difficult during the Covid 19 pandemic in HMP Swansea, however, ACCT training is required to be carried out with much more frequency than the training provided to the officer on reception and staff should understand that warning markers that require an ACCT to be opened. I am concerned that unless prison officers are provided with frequent ACCT training which is kept up to date then there remains a risk of similar deaths occurring in the future in HMP Swansea. ”

    Source location

    Khalid Abiaz · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make suicide and self-harm prevention training, including new modules, available to partner-organisation staff at HMP Swansea.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HMPPS is committed to making ACCT training available to staff working for our partner organisations. At HMP Swansea, healthcare staff are encouraged to access all suicide and self-harm prevention training delivered within the establishment and the new modules will continue to be offered to them. The Governor has also formally requested through the Head of Healthcare, that bank nurses are not deployed in the reception area of the prison and are instead utilised in other areas within the establishment. This is to ensure that permanent nursing staff who have undertaken the ACCT training are allocated to the reception area to complete initial screenings.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reserve two places in each ACCT training session for Health Board staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Although the response from the Prison will address the majority of the points you raise in respect of the adequacy of ACCT training, the Health Board has been working closely with the Prison and we are able to confirm that two slots per ACCT training session will be ring fenced going forward for Health Board staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prioritise and roster Health Board staff to attend ACCT Awareness training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, Health Staff will be rostered to attend the ACCT Awareness training as a matter of priority. Updates on training numbers will be provided by the Health Care lead on a monthly basis via the Quality and Safety forum. Training will be a part of the mandatory induction for new Prison Health Board staff, and refresher training will be accessible to staff also, as and when the prison release dates.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make ACCT training mandatory in induction for new prison Health Board staff and provide refresher access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, Health Staff will be rostered to attend the ACCT Awareness training as a matter of priority. Updates on training numbers will be provided by the Health Care lead on a monthly basis via the Quality and Safety forum. Training will be a part of the mandatory induction for new Prison Health Board staff, and refresher training will be accessible to staff also, as and when the prison release dates.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide ACCT version 6 training to eight prison health staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To date, 8 prison health staff have undergone the version 6 ACCT training with 22 staff members remaining. The Health Board are also negotiating securing places for the medical staff on the training. This remains very much on our radar and as the national ACCT training dates are released, securing places will be a priority for the Health Board for those individuals who work in this setting.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Secure ACCT training places for medical staff as national training dates are released.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To date, 8 prison health staff have undergone the version 6 ACCT training with 22 staff members remaining. The Health Board are also negotiating securing places for the medical staff on the training. This remains very much on our radar and as the national ACCT training dates are released, securing places will be a priority for the Health Board for those individuals who work in this setting.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce and deliver ACCT version 6 training materials and presentations across the prison estate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you note in your report, in July 2021 ACCT version 6 (v6) was rolled out across the prison estate. The revised form and guidance are intended to assist staff in providing high quality multidisciplinary care and support to individuals at risk of suicide and self-harm. Training materials and presentations have been produced and delivered across the estate in order to support staff in their understanding and delivery of the ACCT v6 process. This includes risk identification and how best to provide support to individuals.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prioritise staff with identified concerns for updated ACCT refresher training and provide an ACCT version 6 upskilling session.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our policy (Prison Service Instruction 64/2011 Safer Custody) is clear that all staff who have contact with prisoners must undertake training on ACCT, and that refresher training must be provided according to local needs. This training forms part of the initial training undertaken by all Prison Officers. A new version of the training, which includes information about ACCT v6, has recently been produced and a programme is in place to ensure that all staff at HMP Swansea attend this as refresher training by November 2024. In the light of your report, the individuals about whom you have expressed specific concerns will be prioritised for this training, and for an upskilling session specifically related to ACCT v6 that has also been made available by the national Safety Team.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver the new risk-identification training module to fifteen staff working mainly in reception, induction and healthcare.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to improve the identification of risk in new prisoners and to build confidence in decision making around the opening of ACCT documents, fifteen members of staff who predominantly work in the reception area, induction wing, and healthcare received the new training module in July 2022. The Governor has issued guidance on risk identification and the establishment is scheduling additional training focusing on risks, triggers and protective factors for staff working in these key areas.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue guidance on risk identification and schedule additional training on risks, triggers and protective factors for staff in key areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to improve the identification of risk in new prisoners and to build confidence in decision making around the opening of ACCT documents, fifteen members of staff who predominantly work in the reception area, induction wing, and healthcare received the new training module in July 2022. The Governor has issued guidance on risk identification and the establishment is scheduling additional training focusing on risks, triggers and protective factors for staff working in these key areas.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Request that bank nurses are not deployed in reception and that permanently employed ACCT-trained nursing staff complete initial screenings there.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HMPPS is committed to making ACCT training available to staff working for our partner organisations. At HMP Swansea, healthcare staff are encouraged to access all suicide and self-harm prevention training delivered within the establishment and the new modules will continue to be offered to them. The Governor has also formally requested through the Head of Healthcare, that bank nurses are not deployed in the reception area of the prison and are instead utilised in other areas within the establishment. This is to ensure that permanent nursing staff who have undertaken the ACCT training are allocated to the reception area to complete initial screenings.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce updated ACCT training and implement a programme for all HMP Swansea staff to complete refresher training by November 2024.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our policy (Prison Service Instruction 64/2011 Safer Custody) is clear that all staff who have contact with prisoners must undertake training on ACCT, and that refresher training must be provided according to local needs. This training forms part of the initial training undertaken by all Prison Officers. A new version of the training, which includes information about ACCT v6, has recently been produced and a programme is in place to ensure that all staff at HMP Swansea attend this as refresher training by November 2024. In the light of your report, the individuals about whom you have expressed specific concerns will be prioritised for this training, and for an upskilling session specifically related to ACCT v6 that has also been made available by the national Safety Team.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Healthcare staff concerns are addressed by Swansea Bay University Health Board, the healthcare provider at HMP Swansea.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand that a response is also being provided by Swansea Bay University Health Board, the healthcare provider at HMP Swansea, so in relation to your concerns about healthcare staff I have limited my comments to explaining the training that HMPPS makes available to our partners.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison Probation Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for ACCT training adequacy rests with the prison and will be addressed in the prison’s response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The report highlights your concern around the level and adequacy of the training on ACCT, which falls under the remit of the prison and thus will be addressed separately in the prisons response, but also concerns in respect of a bank nurse employed by SBUHB having access to the ACCT training.”

    Source location

    Response from Swansea Bay University Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 September 2022

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026