Recurring concern

Unreliable access to relevant clinical records for safe care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 12 Sep 2013•Latest report 22 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to retrieve, locate, present or provide access to relevant existing records for assessment, treatment and care decisions.

Not included

  • Excludes absent or inaccurate information that was never reliably recorded.
  • Excludes failures to transfer otherwise available information to another service or recipient.
  • Excludes failure to review records that were already available unless access or retrieval was also deficient.
Reports
122

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
129

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
192

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care23
NHS England22
Care Quality Commission6
Barts Health NHS Trust5
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB5
HM Prison and Probation Service5
Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Local Health Board4
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust4
Recipient name withheld4
Swansea Bay University Local Health Board4
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust3
North London NHS Foundation Trust3
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust3
Royal London Hospital3
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    JOHN EDWARD BRYNMOR PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Edward Brynmor Phillips, aged 37, died by suicide in his cell at HMP Dartmoor on 29 October 2022 after using a ligature. A referral to the prison mental health team was cancelled when his electronic health records were deactivated during a records-uploading process, causing a delay of approximately 2.5 months in his mental health assessment and treatment. The principal concern was that SystmOne could deactivate an active record and cancel current clinical tasks and referrals without this being apparent, creating a risk of unsafe care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to prevent or clearly identify automatic deactivation of an active SystmOne patient record by access from a previously involved organisation

    Wider context from the report

    “The national SystmOne electronic patient record operates in an unsafe way because it appears to allow a patient’s record to be accessed (which might be for a necessary administrative reason) by a member of staff in an organisation previously involved in the patient’s care, which seems to have the automatic effect of deactivating the patient’s active record in an organisation currently involved in the patient’s care (and associated appointments, tasks, treatment plans etc), without this being obvious to anyone – this leads to the removal of important and current tasks, referrals and appointments for the patient whilst they are being cared for by the current organisation and will likely result in unsafe clinical care being provided by NHS Trusts. ”

    Source location

    JOHN EDWARD BRYNMOR PHILLIPS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share the investigation findings and learning with relevant health and justice organisations, highlighting the need to avoid inappropriate record re-registration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to ensure that all healthcare providers are aware of this investigation and any learning, we will be sharing the findings with the NHS England Regional Health and Justice Commissioning Teams, the Welsh Health Board and HMP Parc. We will highlight to them that when accessing the records of a patient who has left a prison, healthcare staff are mindful of the movement of records and not requesting the re-registering of the patient that is no longer a resident in that prison.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The events were attributed to human error rather than a systemic SystmOne issue.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Once a patient has transferred between prisons and their SystmOne record is accessed for purposes such as updating, it does not automatically pull the patient and records back to the previous site when they are accessed. A request to re-register the patients record is required for this. If the re-register request is made, the deactivation or deactivation of the record at the “new” prison then takes place. This appears to be what happened in this case and was human error, not an automatic process. We therefore do not believe that the events in this tragic case were due to a systemic issue within SystmOne.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record movement does not affect patients’ clinical care or treatment plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To further reassure you, this does not impact on clinical care and treatment plans. Once the request to correct the re-registration is made, the patient’s records remain as they were and are unaffected by this movement of their clinical record.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 August 2026

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Joseph William Cooper · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joseph William Cooper died outside his home on 19 June 2025 after sustaining multiple traumatic injuries in a fall while profoundly intoxicated. His death was contributed to by depression and alcohol dependence syndrome. Concerns included unmet mental health needs for people with co-occurring mental health and substance misuse conditions, the ready online availability of large quantities of alcohol, and professionals’ lack of access to his mental health records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide drug and alcohol service professionals with access to relevant mental health records

    Wider context from the report

    “3) The court heard evidence that professionals from the drug and alcohol service treating Mr Cooper had no access to his mental health records despite both mental health and drug and alcohol services being provided under the auspices of the same NHS Foundation Trust. Whilst the court heard that Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust is urgently seeking to grant viewer access to relevant patients’ mental health records to the drug and alcohol team, it is a matter of concern that no complete and unified digital NHS health records system currently exists within England and Wales. ”

    Source location

    Joseph William Cooper · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with NHS England and sector partners to overcome barriers to data sharing between services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Secondly, regarding your concerns raised regarding sharing information and data between services and clinicians, the delivery framework also states that all service providers need to work together with all relevant local services to agree data sharing arrangements that reflect the needs of people with a co-occurring mental health and substance use need. This is also in line with the NICE guidance recommendations on information sharing, 1.4.6 and 1.4.7. Work is ongoing alongside NHSE and sector partners to overcome the challenges and barriers to data sharing between services.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce the Single Patient Record to enable sharing of patient information across relevant health and social care providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Furthermore, the upcoming introduction of the Single Patient Record will allow patient information to be more easily shared with patients and their relevant health and social care providers (such as GPs, hospital doctors, social care workers and others involved in their direct care). The Single Patient Record will provide a single record of patient needs and history, consistently across the NHS and social care in England.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 June 2026

    Open published response
  3. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    Theresa Lydon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Theresa Lydon had severe ulcerative colitis and was admitted to hospital on four occasions before her death following complications of surgery, including an intra-abdominal haemorrhage. The report identifies concerns about delayed prescribing, unclear communication of treatment plans, inadequate access to medical records between NHS Trusts, and the absence of repeated blood tests that contributed to her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide prompt access to patient medical records across NHS Trusts

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) On Mrs Lydon's admission to hospital in Gateshead in July 2022 certain investigations, treatment and diagnosis were made. She was then discharged and returned to hospital in South Tyneside, a neighbouring NHS Trust in August for what amounted to a further 3 hospital admissions there before her death. Evidence was heard that the doctors in South Tyneside whilst aware of her recent admission in Gateshead could not access her medical records for that admission. They requested them in August, but they were not supplied until November, after she had died. I understand much work regionally has been undertaken since 2022 with North East England based NHS Trusts to make 'real time' access to patient records possible, but whilst improved it is not complete and this is also a national issue I understand. Given the two hospitals Mrs Lydon was a patient in are only 6 miles apart it raises a concern that doctors attending Mrs Lydon in one location are denied access to another hospital records so close at hand and I understand this is not a position unique to these hospitals. To me, the inability of doctors to promptly access a patient's medical records from other NHS Trusts to provide the best possible care creates a risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Theresa Lydon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop the Red Tape Challenge to improve primary-secondary care communication, interface working, prescribing, records access, interoperability, and process standardisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An initiative called the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ was developed to improve the interface between primary and secondary care, such as how referrals are made and managed, patient discharge and how different parts of the health service communicate with each other. The Red Tape Challenge led to 10 recommendations, which were cascaded through Regional Medical Directors. The focus of the Red Tape Challenge is on reducing unnecessary bureaucracy, improving communication and understanding, strengthening culture and interface working between primary and secondary care, improving digital and estates infrastructure, streamlining healthcare delivery, enhancing patient experience, and freeing up clinical time. Those especially relating to this case include:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 6 · response
    Published 19 June 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a Single Patient Record across England to enable consistent sharing of patient information among relevant health and social care providers from 2028.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I would like to highlight action we are taking at a national level which will radically improve data sharing between NHS service providers, whether they are neighbouring hospitals as was in Mrs Lydon’s case, or at opposite ends of the country.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 June 2026

    Open published response
  4. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ruariri Thomas Stewart, aged 29, died from fatal cocaine toxicity at Weaver Lodge Independent Hospital on 31 July 2025 after a period of unescorted leave during which he probably obtained cocaine. The report identifies concerns about failures in documentation, communication, information sharing, leave decision-making, substance-misuse management, record keeping, and the quality of post-incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fragmented storage of clinical records without a central access point

    Wider context from the report

    “11. Over the course of the inquest there were multiple, serious, disclosure issues relating to non-disclosure of medical records. It appears that at the time medical records were kept across a variety of locations and programmes, electronic and in paper. Staff therefore would not have had a central place to go to find all relevant clinical information about a patient. I am informed that there are plans to implement an electronic record keeping system but I do not have information about the nature, scope or timeframes for this. ”

    Source location

    Ruariri Thomas STEWART · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a structured Disclosure Control Toolkit and governance process for mapping, searching, collating, reviewing and disclosing records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In response to the Coroner’s concern, AFG has reviewed its approach to record collation and disclosure and has taken action to strengthen the consistency and auditability of this process.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require relevant patient information, including externally generated clinical documents, to be recorded, stored and uploaded through the expected DSR process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Staff have been reminded that relevant person/patient information, including externally generated clinical documents received by a property, must be recorded, stored and uploaded in line with the expected DSR process.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 6 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Medical information may legitimately remain across multiple appropriate sources; a structured collation and disclosure process can address this without a single central record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Over the course of the inquest there were multiple, serious, disclosure issues relating to non-disclosure of medical records. It appears that at the time medical records were not kept across a variety of locations and programmes, electronic and in paper. Staff therefore would not have had a central place to go to find all relevant clinical information about a patient. I am informed that there are plans to implement an electronic record keeping system but I do not have information about the nature, scope or timeframes for this.”

    Source location

    Response from Alternative Futures Group
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 March 2026

    Open published response
  5. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Lyn Maher · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lyn Maher, aged 79, was prescribed clarithromycin while taking simvastatin and was not advised to stop the statin. She was admitted to hospital, where the contraindicated co-ingestion was not identified, the statin continued, and rhabdomyolysis was missed; she died following cardiac arrest due to hyperkalaemia on 23 January 2024. The concerns included confusion among community pharmacists about clinical checks and confidentiality, and their limited access in Wales to relevant drug history and test results.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited access for community pharmacists to patients’ drug histories and recent test results

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) I am concerned that community pharmacists in Wales only have very limited access to the Welsh Clinical Portal, where they can see relevant drug history and recent test results, which would enable them to properly and safely counsel patients to stop contraindicated drugs (here simvastatin with clarithromycin) but applicable more widely. I heard evidence that access to such information is available routinely in English pharmacies, but only in exceptional circumstances in Wales. I have no understanding of why this is the case. (4) Here, had either community pharmacist had access to Lyn’s drug history, they would have noted the contraindication and either told Lyn, her representative or written on the pharmacy bag that she was to stop the simvastatin. This likely would have changed the outcome for Lyn. ”

    Source location

    Lyn Maher · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Write to pharmacy owners, pharmacists and pharmacy technicians with patient-safety concerns, recommended safeguards and supporting resources.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Raising awareness”

    Source location

    2026-0053 - Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Digital Health and Care Wales is responsible for explaining pharmacy access requirements and planned changes to patient records in Wales.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We note that you have shared your concerns with Digital Health and Care Wales who are well placed to explain their requirements for pharmacies in Wales providing NHS services to access patient records and any planned changes to access.”

    Source location

    2026-0053 - Response from General Pharmaceutical Council
    Page 5 · response
    Published 4 February 2026

    Open published response
  6. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Akhona MOYO · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Akhona Moyo, aged 4, died on 26 November 2022 at Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, from a brain tumour. The principal concern was that hospital doctors lacked electronic access to detailed primary care records, which the evidence indicated would assist in delivering better treatment and care, particularly for patients who are autistic and non-verbal.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of hospital doctors’ electronic access to detailed primary care medical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “Hospital doctors, including in the Emergency Department and Paediatrics, do not have electronic access to primary care medical notes e.g. GP notes, community mental health notes etc. At Northampton General Hospital, a new electronic system known as “Nerve Centre” contains only hospital notes. Hospital doctors also have access to the “Northamptonshire Care Record” which contains basic lists of GP visits and medication, but no detailed entries. All the doctors that gave evidence to the Inquest stated that access to primary care records would undoubtedly assist them in delivering better patient treatment and care. It was felt that access to such information was particularly important in cases such as the present when a patient is autistic and non-verbal. There may be a multitude of other reasons why a patient or their family may not be able to relay to doctors a full and accurate medical history. Access may also enable doctors to have a more global view of a patient’s medical condition rather than, as it was put at Inquest, “working in silos”. ”

    Source location

    Akhona MOYO · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Single Patient Record to unify patient data from multiple sources and provide clinicians access through existing clinical systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I agree that ensuring health and care professionals have access to a single source of digital information about the patients they are treating and caring for is vitally important to delivering the best care possible. The Department of Health and Social Care, and NHS England have programmes of work underway which should assist in preventing future deaths connected to this issue.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lead the Frontline Digitisation Programme to support adoption and safe deployment of electronic patient record systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises that limited information sharing between care settings can contribute to delays in discharge, incomplete handovers and less effective continuity of care, particularly when patients receive support across organisational or geographical boundaries. NHS England has developed and led the Frontline Digitisation (FD) Programme, which has supported provider organisations to adopt Electronic Patient Record (EPR) systems which support increased consistency in digital maturity but also improve information sharing within and between organisations.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the Frontline Productivity Programme to improve access to patient information and develop digital workflow capabilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further digital investment has been confirmed for the Frontline Productivity (FP) Programme, a four-year initiative which is beginning in April 2026. The programme aims to help NHS organisations realise the full benefits of digitised patient information by developing the capabilities enabled through EPR systems, building on the successful implementation funding provided through the FD Programme.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work across the health system to support greater integration and awareness of medical-record sharing between providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is aware of the challenge in sharing medical records between providers and the variability between areas using different technologies. We are also aware that use of the SCR is variable across different care settings. We are therefore working across the health system to support greater integration and awareness of record sharing between providers. We are also working with the SCR Programme to support wider access to relevant patient information.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the Summary Care Record Programme to support wider access to relevant patient information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is aware of the challenge in sharing medical records between providers and the variability between areas using different technologies. We are also aware that use of the SCR is variable across different care settings. We are therefore working across the health system to support greater integration and awareness of record sharing between providers. We are also working with the SCR Programme to support wider access to relevant patient information.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide clinicians with Northamptonshire Care Record access containing expanded primary care information, with Summary Care Record information migrated into it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Northamptonshire Care Record (NCR) This is now available at NGH, providing clinicians with access to GP data including medications, allergies, diagnoses, and lists of GP consultations. This has single sign-on integration from our clinical system (Nervecentre) into NCR and this element is currently in final testing and expected to be available within weeks, removing the need for separate logins.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide clinicians with GP Connect access to structured primary care data, including medications and allergies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• GP Connect This is now available at NGH, providing structured data from GP records including medications and allergies.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete single-sign-on integration from Nervecentre into the Northamptonshire Care Record to remove separate logins.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Northamptonshire Care Record (NCR) This is now available at NGH, providing clinicians with access to GP data including medications, allergies, diagnoses, and lists of GP consultations. This has single sign-on integration from our clinical system (Nervecentre) into NCR and this element is currently in final testing and expected to be available within weeks, removing the need for separate logins.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise the requirement for GP free-text access with the National Record Locator and Shared Patient Record Programme Boards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• By the end of March 2026, we will raise the requirement for GP free text access with the National Record Locator and Shared Patient Record Programme Boards;”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with Northamptonshire Integrated Care Board to explore enhanced primary-care data-sharing options.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We are continuing to work with Northamptonshire Integrated Care Board to explore options for enhanced data sharing within primary care;”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue advocating for access to full GP consultation notes through appropriate national forums.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I trust that the above information and progress to date demonstrates the substantial improvements to primary care information access since November 2022. I acknowledge that full GP consultation notes remain unavailable and that achieving this would require national actions on data standards and information governance frameworks. I can provide assurance that we will continue to advocate this through the appropriate national forums.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Access to the Northamptonshire Care Record is determined locally and falls outside NHS England’s remit to comment on.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Access and information contained within the local ‘Northamptonshire Care Record’ is determined by local policy and procedures and therefore falls outside of NHS England’s remit to comment upon.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust is responsible for, and better placed to answer, questions about local EPR integration and hospital information access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the FD Programme, Northampton General Hospital secured funding and went live with the Nervecentre Electronic Patient Record (EPR) on 27 June 2025. Prior to adoption, patient information was recorded through a range of non-standardised processes rather than a single integrated EPR. NHS England are unable to state the ability of Nervecentre to integrate or view GP primary care records as this would be dependant on the local trust and organisation. We would suggest that the Coroner directs this query to the Trust.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Full GP free-text consultation notes cannot currently be accessed because they are outside the scope of national shared-care-record programmes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are working within the national boundaries of what is currently achievable in terms of being able to access general practitioner consultation notes and free text entries within primary care. We share the views of our clinicians that such access would benefit patient care, but there are currently significant national barriers to overcome before this is possible.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Direct access to GP systems is constrained by the need for agreements with numerous practices, including cross-boundary practices, and previous negotiations did not progress.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Information governance Direct read access to GP clinical systems (EMIS and SystmOne) has been explored previously in Northamptonshire. This requires individual data sharing agreements with each of the 66 GP practices in the county, plus consideration of practices across county boundaries whose patients attend our hospitals. Previous attempts to negotiate these agreements did not progress. Additionally, 20% of Northamptonshire patients are registered with practices using EMIS rather than SystmOne, and any solution would need to ensure equitable access for all patients.”

    Source location

    2026-0045 - Response from University Hospitals of Northamptonshire NHS Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 January 2026

    Open published response
  7. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Amy Grace Pugh · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amy Grace Pugh took an overdose of drugs around midnight on 10 April 2024 and died on the morning of 11 April 2024; the inquest could not determine her intent. Concerns included clinical staff being unable to access important mental-health records from partner NHS institutions and overnight observations that did not involve entering her room or physically examining her.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of access to important mental health records from partner NHS mental health institutions

    Wider context from the report

    “Following Amy’s admission to Avondale Unit on 8th April 2024, clinical staff were unable to access important records pertaining to Amy’s mental health from partner NHS mental health institutions and this compromised her assessment and subsequent management. The approved findings of fact are attached. ”

    Source location

    Amy Grace Pugh · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work across the health system to support greater integration and awareness of record sharing between providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is aware of the challenge in sharing medical records between providers and the variability between areas using different technologies. We are also aware that use of the SCR is variable across different care settings. We are therefore working across the health system to support greater integration and awareness of record sharing between providers. We are also working with the SCR Programme to support wider access to relevant patient information.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the Summary Care Record Programme to support wider access to relevant patient information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is aware of the challenge in sharing medical records between providers and the variability between areas using different technologies. We are also aware that use of the SCR is variable across different care settings. We are therefore working across the health system to support greater integration and awareness of record sharing between providers. We are also working with the SCR Programme to support wider access to relevant patient information.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Individual NHS trusts are responsible for procuring, implementing and locally converging their electronic patient record systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is committed to improving the maturity and quality of Electronic Patient Records (EPRs) across all NHS Trusts. NHS England has provided funding to ensure all NHS Trusts have an EPR implemented. It is, however, up to individual NHS Trusts to effectively procure and implement their chosen EPR system, and to agree and progress any convergence of EPR systems within their local systems.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 20 January 2026

    Open published response
  8. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Hannah Louise Booth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hannah Louise Booth, who had been diagnosed with post-natal depression after giving birth in July 2024, drowned in the Goyt River on 6 January 2025 after sending a message evidencing her intention to take her own life. The report identified concerns about information sharing between services, including different record systems, incomplete records, and relevant information about Hannah being recorded only in her baby’s records. Increasing contact about her baby’s development was not shared with perinatal mental health services or recognised as potentially indicating that Hannah was struggling.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a single electronic patient record accessible to all services

    Wider context from the report

    “This inquest has exposed important issues with information sharing between services and also within services. Those issues are: • Difficulties encountered because different IT systems were being used for record keeping in different services. Essentially a lack of a single patient record. • A lack of a shared understanding of what is relevant information and needs to be made available to other services. • Relevant notes being made in records of baby and not repeated in notes of the mum. Further detail: 1. Sett Valley, the health visitors and perinatal mental health services all had information about Hannah that was potentially relevant to her mental health, but none had the whole picture. It was evident that had those within the perinatal mental health services known about Hannah’s increasing frequency of contact with services about her baby’s development, it would have prompted further contact by them with Hannah and prompted a review of risk and support offered. They did not know and there was no further contact. 2. There was no single electronic patient record accessible to all services. Whilst the perinatal mental health and health visitors used SystmOne, Sett Valley did not. The health visitor had not informed Sett Valley about the contact Hannah had had with them on 27th December so that the GP seeing Hannah on 31st did not know that Hannah was beginning to make increased contact with services about her concerns and did not share any information about that consultation with other services. 3. There was increasing contact with health visitors that was not escalated to or shared with perinatal mental health. The significance of the increased contact, to Hannah’s mental health, did not appear to have been understood. The concerns raised at each contact around her baby’s development were dealt with at face value with exploration and examination of her baby’s development and reassurances given to Hannah regarding the particular concerns raised. The evidence revealed that it was not the individual concerns raised that were relevant to Hannah’s mental health but the fact that she was making more frequent contact which suggested she was struggling. There are no policies, guidance or any shared understanding between services of what might be relevant information to be shared and when. 4. Within both Sett Valley and health visitor records there was potentially important information relevant to Hannah’s mental health recorded only within her baby’s records. At any future appointments concerning Hannah the relevant medical history available on her record would have been incomplete. It also meant that whilst the perinatal mental health services had access to the health visitor notes in relation to Hannah (because they both used SystmOne), even had they had cause to look at Hannah’s notes they would still not have had all relevant information. There are no policies or guidance regarding when information potentially relevant to both mother and baby should be placed in both records or cross referenced. This appears to be particularly important in the perinatal period. ”

    Source location

    Hannah Louise Booth · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share identified non-SystmOne GP practices with Perinatal CMHT clinicians and administrators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “SystmOne ‘alert’ Following the conclusion of the Inquest, the Perinatal CMHT has undertaken an audit of GP’s within its catchment area who do not use the same electronic patient record, SystmOne and have shared this information with all clinicians and administrators internally for awareness. To ensure continuing knowledge internally of GP’s who do not use SystmOne, the Trust is in the process of adding an ‘alert’ onto patients’ medical records as a reminder / notification. The Trust has taken this specific action wider than the Perinatal CMHT to include the High Peak CMHT / CRHT as that is the geographical area that the Trust covers where GP’s do not have SystmOne; in other areas GP’s do have SystmOne.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add alerts to patient records identifying GP practices that do not use SystmOne.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “SystmOne ‘alert’ Following the conclusion of the Inquest, the Perinatal CMHT has undertaken an audit of GP’s within its catchment area who do not use the same electronic patient record, SystmOne and have shared this information with all clinicians and administrators internally for awareness. To ensure continuing knowledge internally of GP’s who do not use SystmOne, the Trust is in the process of adding an ‘alert’ onto patients’ medical records as a reminder / notification. The Trust has taken this specific action wider than the Perinatal CMHT to include the High Peak CMHT / CRHT as that is the geographical area that the Trust covers where GP’s do not have SystmOne; in other areas GP’s do have SystmOne.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Draft an information leaflet explaining different electronic records, their impact, and risk mitigation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Information leaflet to GP’s on referral The Perinatal CMHT has drafted an information leaflet for GPs setting out that this Trust and the GP practice use different electronic patient record systems, highlighting the impact of this and detailing risk mitigation. This leaflet will be sent to GPs on receipt of a referral from them if they do not have the same electronic patient record. An additional page has been added to the e-referral document for professionals regarding the sharing of contextual information around the patient. A patient will also be informed that their GP is not on the same electronic patient record so that they too are aware that information sharing is not automatic at the time of their appointment.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send the electronic-record information leaflet to GPs when referring patients from practices using different systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Information leaflet to GP’s on referral The Perinatal CMHT has drafted an information leaflet for GPs setting out that this Trust and the GP practice use different electronic patient record systems, highlighting the impact of this and detailing risk mitigation. This leaflet will be sent to GPs on receipt of a referral from them if they do not have the same electronic patient record. An additional page has been added to the e-referral document for professionals regarding the sharing of contextual information around the patient. A patient will also be informed that their GP is not on the same electronic patient record so that they too are aware that information sharing is not automatic at the time of their appointment.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add contextual-information-sharing guidance to the electronic referral document for professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Information leaflet to GP’s on referral The Perinatal CMHT has drafted an information leaflet for GPs setting out that this Trust and the GP practice use different electronic patient record systems, highlighting the impact of this and detailing risk mitigation. This leaflet will be sent to GPs on receipt of a referral from them if they do not have the same electronic patient record. An additional page has been added to the e-referral document for professionals regarding the sharing of contextual information around the patient. A patient will also be informed that their GP is not on the same electronic patient record so that they too are aware that information sharing is not automatic at the time of their appointment.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide team training on using EMIS interoperability to view SystemOne within two months.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the Significant Event Meeting the Practice discussed the fact that we have the ability to view SystemOne but this ability is quite limited as only the patient’s most recent entries can be viewed. Staff would need to have a reason to access this information as it is not feasible to check this for every patient. We as a practice refer patients to a number of other services which use different IT systems such as Mental Health Services, Hospitals and Community services. It was agreed that we will provide training for the team on using the interoperability function in EMIS to view SystemOne and this training will be given within 2 months of this Response.”

    Source location

    Response from Sett Valley Medical centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide £20 million investment to connect care records across England by March 2026.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England recognises the challenge of separate systems being used by different health and social care organisations. New initiatives and systems are being designed to integrate records. NHS England has invested £20 million to connect care records across England by March 2026. This will facilitate the safe and secure exchange of electronic health data across different systems, devices and applications. It is also expected that this will improve the information available to health and social care staff.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop the Single Patient Record to provide unified access to patient information across care settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Work is also progressing to develop a Single Patient Record (SPR). The SPR aims to provide a clear, unified view of a patient’s health and care history, regardless of where”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the Summary Care Record Programme to support wider access to relevant patient information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is aware of the challenges in sharing medical records between providers and the variability between areas using different technologies. We are also aware that use of the SCR is variable across different care settings.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Configuration and interoperability of clinical record systems across NHS providers and GP practices fall outside the Trust’s direct control and remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust acknowledges that variations in clinical IT systems across NHS organisations can present challenges to the timely sharing of patient information. However, the configuration, interoperability and alignment of clinical record systems across NHS providers and GP practices are determined at a national and system level and sit outside the direct control and remit of the Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Community Health Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Resolving the absence of a unified patient record requires system-wide and national action overseen by NHS England, rather than action by an individual Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust notes that the absence of a single, unified patient record across all NHS and GP settings is a longstanding national issue, overseen by NHS England. Any substantive resolution to this issue would require system-wide and national action, rather than action by an individual NHS Trust.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Community Health Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing universal health visiting, professional communication, GP liaison and record-access arrangements address local information-sharing needs despite the absence of a single record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Notwithstanding these system-level constraints, the Trust has robust arrangements in place to ensure that children and young people receive universal health visiting services, and GP practices are aware of and able to engage with those services.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Community Health Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Changing from EMIS to SystmOne would significantly increase risk across integrated primary-care and community services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Practice provides primary care medical services via a Personal Medical Services (PMS) contract commissioned by NHSE England (“NHSE”) and the Derby and Derbyshire Integrated Care Board (ICB). It is part of a Primary Care Network (“PCN”) comprising 8 practices serving approximately 60,000 patients across North Derbyshire, all of which use the EMIS software system. EMIS and SystmOne are the most commonly used electronic GP medical record software systems in the UK. EMIS is used by over 50% of GP practices in the UK and by all 8 practices in our PCN. Whilst most practices in Derbyshire use SystemOne, all Practices in the High Peak area use EMIS. It is vital for effective and safe working across the Practices and for our patients to have access to the shared PCN services including the home visiting service, pharmacy team, social prescribers and others.”

    Source location

    Response from Sett Valley Medical centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Interoperability specifications and related information-technology due diligence are outside the Practice’s authority and control.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The development of the ability for electronic GP medical record systems such as SystemOne and EMIS to communicate with each other and allow sharing of clinical information, is not within the control of any individual GP practice, including ours. This is a matter that falls under the responsibility of the service commissioners at Derbyshire-wide level, specifically the NHS Derby & Derbyshire Integrated Care Board (ICB), which is responsible for commissioning services, including general practice, in the area. Individual practices, including ours, have no authority to determine the specifications of such services, nor are they involved in the due diligence processes related to the Information Management and Technology (IM&T) aspects of these systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Sett Valley Medical centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Developing interoperability between EMIS and SystmOne is the responsibility of the NHS Derby and Derbyshire Integrated Care Board as service commissioner.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The development of the ability for electronic GP medical record systems such as SystemOne and EMIS to communicate with each other and allow sharing of clinical information, is not within the control of any individual GP practice, including ours. This is a matter that falls under the responsibility of the service commissioners at Derbyshire-wide level, specifically the NHS Derby & Derbyshire Integrated Care Board (ICB), which is responsible for commissioning services, including general practice, in the area. Individual practices, including ours, have no authority to determine the specifications of such services, nor are they involved in the due diligence processes related to the Information Management and Technology (IM&T) aspects of these systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Sett Valley Medical centre
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England does not mandate IT infrastructure, so it cannot require a single electronic patient record across providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Historically, different care settings have adopted different clinical systems to maintain a clinical record; some areas have adopted the same electronic patient record (such as SystmOne), whereas other areas have adopted shared care records which can provide access to records from different care settings. The GP record is available via GP Connect, the Summary Care Record and the Medical Interoperability Gateway (MIG), but the availability and content does vary across England. NHS England does not mandate IT infrastructure.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response
  9. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Dominic Edward Arthur HURLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 8 July 2024, Dominic Hurley became unwell during an offshore dive, made a rapid uncontrolled ascent, became unconscious, and later died in hospital. The principal concern was that he had not disclosed a previous serious diving incident and cardiac history when renewing his diving licence, with reliance on self-declaration questionnaires without further enquiry or access to previous medical history identified as a potential risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Overreliance on self-declaration questionnaires without further enquiry or access to previous medical history

    Wider context from the report

    “In 2018 Mr Hurley suffered shortness of breath and pulmonary oedema during a dive in Malta. This led to him having a heart bypass on his return to the UK. There was significant family history of cardiac related issues. Time passed but in 2021 and 2023 Mr Hurley sort to renew his diving licence. Mr Hurley completed his self declaration questionnaire. At no stage did he declare the events in 2018 in relation to his dive and nor did he discuss this with the Dr assessing him. It is likely that he Dr been aware of the previous diving incident a different course of action may have taken. There is currently too much reliance placed on the self declaration questionnaire without any further enquiry or access to previous medical history. This leads to a false sense of reality and put the diver and others at potential risk of death on further dives. ”

    Source location

    Dominic Edward Arthur HURLEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include immersion pulmonary oedema in the diving medical screening declaration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SAA use the medical screening system managed by the UKDMC (United Kingdom Diving Medical Committee) (https://www.ukdmc.org/). I have checked my medical form archive and note that “immersion induced pulmonary oedema” was introduced in the May 2020 version of the declaration at question 17. The current version, May 2024, of the form has this at question 16.”

    Source location

    Response from Sub Aqua Association Space Solutions Business Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind members at renewal and through periodic newsletters to complete medical declarations accurately.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I believe that the SAA has advised its membership and revised their training programme in such a manner as to have already implemented the changes required to mitigate the risk of IPO when diving, in so far as any risk can be mitigated. However, the SAA will ensure that the membership is reminded of the importance of accurately completing medical by emphasising the fact at renewal and with periodic reminders in their newsletters.”

    Source location

    Response from Sub Aqua Association Space Solutions Business Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revised medical screening forms and existing training changes are considered sufficient to mitigate the risk of immersion pulmonary oedema in diving.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I believe that the revision to the current dive medical screening forms now meet the change you are now seeking to make.”

    Source location

    Response from Sub Aqua Association Space Solutions Business Centre
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 November 2025

    Open published response
  10. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Steven Roy Davidson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Steven Roy Davidson died while in prison after a history of self-harm during a previous prison stay. The report identifies concerns that healthcare staff at HMP Chelmsford could not sufficiently navigate or search System One records, or did not sufficiently understand the importance of previous self-harm information when assessing his mental health and risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inability to navigate System One records to find previous incidents of self-harm in prison

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Health Care Staff at HMP Chelmsford say that they are: (i) not able to navigate the System One records sufficiently well to find information about previous incidents of self- harm in prison; and/ or (ii) not sufficiently aware of the importance of searching the records made by clinicians during previous prison stays when conducting Reception Health Screens and/ or reviews of a prisoner’s mental health needs. (iii) May not be sufficiently trained to understand and utilise System One records to find previous history, including incidents of self- harm in custody. ”

    Source location

    Steven Roy Davidson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver structured SystmOne training through induction, refresher training, and equivalent training for long-term agency staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “SystmOne is the NHS electronic patient record system used in prison and custodial healthcare settings across the country. NHS North of England Commissioning Support (NECS) provides training and technical support for users of SystmOne, including system navigation, search functions and information retrieval. HCRG has amended its training provision so that all new staff will now receive structured SystmOne training as part of their induction, provided by NECS and recorded in the mandatory training schedule. This will include guidance on locating clinical information that may be stored in different parts of the system (see further below). Refresher training will also be provided to existing staff within three months and recorded in their personal training record.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require agency staff to confirm in writing that they understand how to navigate SystmOne clinical records and record confirmations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All agency staff will be required to confirm in writing that they understand how to navigate clinical records held in SystmOne and this will be recorded in the ShareDrive. Any long-term agency staff will also complete the same structured training as permanent staff.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce through clinical governance that practitioners consider risk-related history, including information beyond the default summary record view.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All Practitioners conducting clinical assessments should, as part of good practice, review relevant patient history when undertaking reception screenings, mental health reviews or risk assessments. In this case, it appears that practitioners focused primarily on Mr Davidson's current presentation rather than reviewing earlier records in depth. HCRG will reinforce through clinical governance that risk-related history should be considered when assessing patients, and that in some cases this may involve searching beyond the default summary record view.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Expand monthly clinical-note audits to check access to relevant historic information during risk assessments and report findings through governance and quality monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that records are being reviewed appropriately, the existing monthly audit of clinical notes will now include specific checks as to whether practitioners have accessed relevant historic information when assessing risk. Findings from the audit will feed into governance meetings and quality and performance monitoring available to NHS England commissioners.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed SystmOne training into governance and supervision processes to support consistent and safe use of the platform.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HCRG’s Performance and Quality teams are embedding SystmOne training into existing governance and supervision processes to ensure consistent and safe use of the platform. Staff may also contact the Performance and Quality Lead if further clarification is needed, either directly or via their line manager.”

    Source location

    Response from HCRG Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 October 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026