Recurring concern

Unreliable documentation of falls and related clinical response

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 31 Oct 2013•Latest report 26 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to clearly and sufficiently record a fall, relevant symptoms or injuries, measures taken to seek medical advice, and related fall-care information needed for ongoing care, handover or review.

Not included

  • Excludes general clinical or care-record deficiencies unrelated to falls or the response to a fall.
  • Excludes failures to assess, treat or escalate a fall when the documentation of the fall and response was adequate.
  • Excludes failures in falls prevention, supervision or post-fall clinical care where documentation is not the shared unsafe condition.
Reports
20

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
20

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
23

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Arrowe Park Hospital1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Blenheim House1
Borough Care Ltd1
Bupa Care Homes1
Bupa UK Provision1
Cann House Care Home1
Care Quality Commission1
Cole Valley Care Limited1
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust1
Daryel Care1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Durham Constabulary1
Durham County Council1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Urmila Patel, aged 78, was admitted to hospital with suspected sepsis and later fell in a ward toilet on 29 June 2025. She subsequently deteriorated and died in hospital on 7 July 2025 after a CT scan identified a significant subdural haematoma. The concerns included inadequate falls-risk assessment, mobility care planning, supervision, assessment for intracranial bleeding, timely CT referral, and review of her warfarin after the fall.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record falls

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The failure of nurses on the ward to instigate an adequate falls risk assessment of Mrs Patel. 2. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to produce a meaningful care-plan for Mrs Patel’s mobility. 3. The failure of Trust staff to note a fall on 23rd June 2025 and reassess risk of falls. 4. The failure of nursing staff on the ward to monitor and supervise Mrs Patel on the afternoon of 29th June 2025. 5. The failure of Trust staff to adequately assess the likelihood of a traumatic intra-cranial bleed following the fall on 29th June 2025. 6. The failure of the duty doctor to act decisively and refer Mrs Patel for an urgent CT Head scan on 29th June 2025. 7. The failure of the duty doctor to review Mrs Patel’s warfarin prescription after the fall. 8. The failure of ward staff on the ward round on 30th June 2025 to read the clinical records from the previous day to alert them to Mrs Patel’s fall on 29th June 2025. ”

    Source location

    Urmila Patel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a mandatory post-fall care bundle and checklist requiring structured assessment, neurological observations, escalation triggers and clinical documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A mandatory post-fall care bundle and checklist has been introduced for all inpatient falls. This ensures that each fall is managed as a clinical event requiring structured assessment and response, aligned to the Patient Safety Incident Response Framework.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce contemporaneous documentation and communication of inpatient falls and significant safety events during nursing and medical handovers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Actions taken The Trust has reinforced expectations that all inpatient falls and significant safety events are documented contemporaneously and clearly communicated during both nursing and medical handover.”

    Source location

    Response from Barts Health NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England, which oversees the issues raised, is responsible for responding directly to the Prevention of Future Deaths report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Given the concerns you have raised I feel it is important that you receive a response directly from NHS England as it has oversight for the issues you raise. Therefore, my officials have contacted NHS England who have agreed to respond to you directly about the Prevention of Future Death report concerning Mrs Patel.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 3 March 2026

    Open published response
  2. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela George, aged 70, died at Derriford Hospital on 30 June 2023 after being urgently admitted with suspected sepsis. The report identified missed opportunities to carry out required blood tests, manage a breast infection, document and escalate a fall and medical concerns, assess and record capacity, and maintain relevant care-home policies and records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear documentation of falls, symptoms and measures taken to seek medical input

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The documentation surrounding the fall, the symptoms seen and measures taken to seek medical input were not clear. ”

    Source location

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have managers immediately review incident forms for detail, completeness and clinical appropriateness.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A new system has been implemented whereby a manager reviews all incident forms immediately following any incident to ensure detail, completeness and clinical appropriateness.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen falls management and post-incident observation procedures for documenting falls, assessments and escalation reasoning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A strengthened Falls Management and Post-Incident Observation Procedures in place, including: ○ Comprehensive documentation of the fall circumstances. ○ Required physical observations and pain assessments. ○ Neurological observations where clinically indicated. ○ Clear documentation of clinical reasoning regarding escalation to medical professionals.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use mandatory post-fall observation charts for unwitnessed or potentially injurious falls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Mandatory post-fall observation charts are now used for unwitnessed or potentially injurious falls.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide care staff refresher training in incident reporting and falls management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All care staff have received refresher training in incident reporting and falls management.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response
  3. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Walter Colin HORTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Walter Colin HORTON, an 88-year-old male, died in a nursing home on 10 January 2025. The recorded causes included sepsis and an advanced sacral pressure sore, with ischaemic heart disease also noted. Concerns included poor record keeping and failures to understand or follow aseptic techniques and cleanliness when managing wounds, increasing the risk of infection.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to keep adequate records of falls care

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Poor record keeping in regard to key areas of care namely falls and wound management and handover information on discharge (2) A failure to understand or to follow use of aseptic techniques and cleanliness when managing wounds thus increasing the risk of infection. ”

    Source location

    Walter Colin HORTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    There is no record or evidence that the patient experienced a fall during admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is no record or evidence of Mr Horton experiencing a fall during his admission.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS FT
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust disputes that Mr Horton experienced a fall during admission, stating that no record or evidence of a fall exists.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Record Keeping - Falls”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster & Bassetlaw NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 September 2025

    Open published response
  4. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Stephen LAWRENCE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephen Lawrence, a resident at Eastcroft Nursing Home, sustained an unwitnessed fall on 21 December 2022 and multiple rib fractures, which led to a haemopneumothorax and pneumonia. He died in hospital on 5 January 2023; concerns included unexplained injuries, deficient nursing home records, delayed medical advice, and conflicting evidence from the nursing home manager, with an ongoing risk to current residents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deficient recording of key events following unwitnessed falls in nursing home records

    Wider context from the report

    “- Mr Lawrence sustained significant unexplained injuries whilst he was a resident at Eastcroft Nursing Home; - Nursing Home records were deficient in their recording of key events following his unwitnessed fall on 21 December 2022; - There was a delay in seeking medical advice following the unwitnessed fall on 21 December 2022; - The Nursing Home Manager providing conflicting evidence about efforts to obtain medical advice and did not accept that the acute fractures leading to Mr Lawrence’s death occurred whilst he was at the nursing home. - In view of all of the above, the Coroner is concerned that there is an ongoing risk to current residents. ”

    Source location

    Stephen LAWRENCE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Hazel Gambles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hazel Gambles was admitted to hospital after a fall at home and was later found to have sustained a brain bleed in an unwitnessed in-patient fall. She died on 27 January 2025, and the report states that the head injury more than minimally contributed to her death. The principal concerns were failures to complete and implement falls assessments and prevention measures, delay in medical review, inadequate communication with her family, failure to report and investigate the fall, and omission of the fall from the discharge letter.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record an inpatient fall on the discharge letter

    Wider context from the report

    “There are several areas of concern around failures in documentation and failures to follow Trust policy, namely: 1. Lying and standing Blood Pressure was not recorded on admission. 2. There was no documentation of any falls prevention measures at the time of the first falls assessment. 3. There is no evidence of falls prevention measures being put in place following the first falls assessment. 4. There was no falls assessment done at the time of transfer to ward B4. There should have been a falls assessment within six hours of transfer but that did not happen. The assessment took place some 23 hours after admission to the ward, by which time Mrs Gambles had already fallen. 5. Following the in-patient fall there was a delay of over 5 hours before a medical review took place. The note recording the request for medical review is not timed. 6. There was no discussion with Mrs Gambles' family explaining the findings of the CT scan and they were not told about the bleed on the brain. 7. No Datix report was done following the in-patient fall leading to a delay in investigation. 8. The in-patient fall is not mentioned on the Discharge letter. I am concerned that these failures suggest a lack of awareness of, and lack of compliance with, the Trust’s processes on falls assessment and record keeping. ”

    Source location

    Hazel Gambles · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a mandatory discharge-summary question covering inpatient falls and other safety incidents, and monitor it during implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a Trust, we have now added a mandatory question to the inpatient discharge summary to ask whether the patient has had a fall, VTE (Venous Thromboembolism), pressure ulcer or any other incident. This will prompt clinicians to consider whether any of these have occurred and if so, it will be clear on the discharge summary. This will be monitored throughout the implementation stage, to ensure effectiveness.”

    Source location

    Response from Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 30 June 2025

    Open published response
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derrick Frederick Tully was found deceased at home on 20 March 2024 after suffering a massive traumatic subdural haemorrhage, following months of falls and declining health. Concerns included unsuitable temporary accommodation, the absence of a key safe despite repeated concerns, an inappropriate reablement care package, failures to record or escalate injuries after a fall, and the discharge of Derrick from a community team without adequately factoring in his cognitive, mental health and safety difficulties.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record significant post-fall injuries in care notes

    Wider context from the report

    “On 20 February Derrick suffered a fall. Severe bruising and swelling developed on his face over the following days but this was not recorded in his care notes by his carers and not escalated until his daughter raised concerns on 24 February. “No concerns” was written in Derrick’s care record and no consideration given to whether he needed to be reviewed by a doctor. ”

    Source location

    Derrick Frederick Tully · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver mandatory refresher training on falls, head-injury recognition, recording, and escalation protocols to all care staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Actions Taken and Proposed Further Action Daryel Care is committed to learning from this incident and has taken and proposes the following actions to mitigate the risk of future similar occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enhance digital photographic injury-upload capability, obtaining explicit client consent in accordance with policy, to supplement written care-note descriptions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Actions Taken and Proposed Further Action Daryel Care is committed to learning from this incident and has taken and proposes the following actions to mitigate the risk of future similar occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update care-documentation guidance and training with structured prompts for detailed injury descriptions and recording the rationale for non-escalation after initial reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Actions Taken and Proposed Further Action Daryel Care is committed to learning from this incident and has taken and proposes the following actions to mitigate the risk of future similar occurrences:”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The fall and developing injury were recorded in care notes, and the head injury was escalated promptly to the multi-disciplinary team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a. Recording of the Fall Incident (20 February 2024) The assertion that the fall incident was "not recorded" is factually incorrect based on Daryel Care's existing records. The electronic care note entry for the visit commencing at 19:00 hrs on 20 February 2024, logged at 19:04 hours, explicitly documents the following: “The carer observed Mr Tully upon arrival with a fresh plaster wrap and wound dressing on his scalp. Mr Tully informed the carer he had sustained an injury from a fall. The carer”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No inappropriate “No concerns” entry attributable to staff was found in the official electronic care records, so its origin and context cannot be confirmed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “d. Reference to "No Concerns" Entry The PFD report states, ““No concerns” was written in Derrick’s care record". Daryel Care utilises the CM2000 electronic care monitoring and recording system for all care work visit notes. A review of all CM2000 electronic care notes logged by Daryel Care staff for Mr Tully between 20 February 2024 and the final visit on 22 February 2024 has been conducted. This comprehensive review has not located any entry made by a Daryel Care staff member within the CM2000 system during this period that contains the phrase "No concerns" or substantively similar wording used in an inappropriate context (i.e., as an overall assessment negating the known head injury). All located notes contain specific details pertinent to the care provided and observations made, including the entries regarding the head injury referenced above.”

    Source location

    Response from Daryel Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Daryel Care reported the fall to Adult Social Care, while ambulance attendance and hospital treatment had already addressed the immediate response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is ASC’s understanding that Daryel Care was not requested to provide evidence to the coroner's court of their recording and reporting of the fall on the 20 February 2024. As part of ASC’s response to the PFD Notice, we have engaged Daryel Care who have provided their records. These evidence that on the 20 February 2024 at 19:12 ‘Derek sustained an injury on his face. He said he had an accident when he went out. The injury was plastered. I prompted his medication from the medication box, and he asked me to leave’.”

    Source location

    Response from Islington Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 March 2025

    Open published response
  7. County Durham and Darlington

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa SAVAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa Savage died on 25 April 2023 at the University Hospital of North Durham from bronchopneumonia, following a fall from her bed at Redwell Hills Care Home on 18 March 2023 and subsequent injuries and decline in health. The concerns included unclear fall-reporting arrangements, ineffective monitoring of her mobilisation, inadequate post-fall medical assessment, missing or insufficient care records, and failure to promptly reassess her care plan after falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clearly document medical advice obtained after resident falls

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Mrs Savage's fall in February 2023 was it appears reported to her GP by her daughter and that led to a nurse attending the home to examine her. Staff at the home do not appear to have done so themselves. It is of concern that after a fall the staff within the home should have a mechanism to ensure medical advice is obtained in a timely fashion and that it is documented clearly and not be reliant on family members summoning help for residents themselves when they have become aware of an incident. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Margaret Louisa SAVAGE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prompt visiting healthcare professionals to sign in, accompany visits with senior staff, document advice and recommendations, and record information for handovers and audit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All visiting professionals including General Practitioners will now be prompted and requested to complete the Visitors Book on arrival to the Home and to await a member of the team to announce their arrival so that they can be accompanied on all visits by a senior member of the care or clinical team, to ensure that any advice or recommendations can be communicated as needed. Senior Care Assistant staff or a Unit Manager on duty will go with the healthcare practitioner when they attend and review and treat our residents. The Senior Carer will then document information in the Healthcare Professionals Visit form. The information recorded will confirm the time and date of the visit and the name of the practitioner.”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Healthcare
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver record-keeping, care-plan and documentation training covering contemporaneous entries, professional visits, emerging risks, RADAR records and archiving.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge the shortcomings in record-keeping at Redwell Hills as addressed in the Home Manager’s statement of 1 December 2023. Record-keeping training and guidance has been heavily promoted within the Home since the issues were identified in connection with Mrs Savage’s death. All existing clinical and care team members have been required to refresh mandatory courses on record-keeping training. Care plan and documentation training was booked for team members at the Home as a face-to-face course following the incident and has taken place regularly with multiple sessions covering the full care team, the last taking place on 8 August 2024. The courses have covered contemporaneous noting of daily events, professional visits and emerging risks, entries in the Group’s incident management system, RADAR, and proper archiving.”

    Source location

    Response from Four Seasons Healthcare
    Page 6 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response
  8. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Reginald Howard Weston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Reginald Howard Weston died from injuries sustained in a fall on 7 July 2021, after having fallen twice on 4 July 2021. The principal concern was that there was no evidence his falls risk assessment was reviewed and recorded as required, including a timely process for completing the review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of documentation demonstrating post-fall review of residents’ risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was given in relation to the Majesticale Falls Management Policy and Procedure requirement to record a review of the resident’s risk assessment in the context of 2 recorded falls on 4 July 2021. Blenheim House management need to consider: a) Documentation demonstrating a review of the resident’s risk assessment has taken place following a fall b) Timely process for completing it ”

    Source location

    Reginald Howard Weston · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require falls to be recorded and post-fall risk assessments completed within 24 hours, and communicate the requirement and its safety rationale to staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. All falls, care plans and risk assessments continue to be reviewed post fall as the position was previously; however a new timescale has been added that the fall needs to be recorded and the risk assessment needs to be completed within 24 hours of any fall. This has been communicated to staff together with an explanation as to why this data is critical in assessing a service users fall risk. A copy of the risk assessment is provided in Appendix 1 to this response.”

    Source location

    2022-0008-Response-from-Blenheim-House-Care-Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 January 2022

    Open published response
  9. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Raymond Alfred POWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Raymond Alfred POWELL became increasingly frail, moved into Cole Valley Nursing Home, and suffered falls on 3 November 2020 that caused an acute subdural haematoma. He later developed an infection and seizure and died on 5 December 2020. Concerns included failures to record a preceding fall, update his falls risk assessment, accurately document observations, formally review the circumstances, and comply with court orders for evidence, creating an ongoing risk to other residents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record preceding resident falls in resident files

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The nursing home manager confirmed that a preceding fall (most likely on 15 October) had not been recorded anywhere within Raymond's file and this was the first time she was aware of a preceding fall (Raymond's family's evidence was they were told during a visit on 15 October, and nursing home carer ████████ confirmed there was a preceding fall a few weeks earlier). The nursing home manager was unable to explain why this preceding fall had not been recorded anywhere. ”

    Source location

    Raymond Alfred POWELL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct internal investigations of all falls, attach action plans, and report falls and incidents weekly to the Nominated Individual.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Manager to conduct internal investigations to all falls and attach action plans. All falls and incidents to be reported on the weekly manager’s report and submitted to Nominated Individual.”

    Source location

    2021-0089-Response-from-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and maintain a centralized post-fall protocol folder containing guidance, a NEWS chart, and a timed observation log.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The Manager has reviewed current documentation regarding post falls reporting and observing. The manager agrees that post documentation protocols was not substantial and did not accurately reflect the observations that took place on the day, so has implemented a new robust post falls protocol folder for the nursing team. This is allocated in one place and therefore nurses can easily access documents. This protocol now gives guidance and clear direction to follow. This protocol also has a NEWS chart that is included within this pack and a timed observation log post fall. Regarding the previous fall, the manager has reviewed archived documentation but is unable to locate any documentation to support the reported preceding fall on or around the 15th October 2021. The manager has spoken to ████████ about this concern.”

    Source location

    2021-0089-Response-from-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 March 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement daily and nightly nursing handover reports, with daily managerial review and a Daily Walkabout Form recording recent incidents and resulting actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ said he was extremely nervous about this situation and had many anxiety attacks before attending Coroner’s Court. ████████ stated he that he panicked throughout the questioning and was not completely sure about the fall around this time. The manager has, however, implemented a new manager’s report/handover for nurses to complete daily and every night. The manager to review handover daily. A Daily Walkabout Form is also in place. This identifies if there has been any accidents or incidents in the last 24 hours and what actions have been done, such as evaluating care needs of the individual involved. Cole Valley Nursing home has promoted an RGN to Deputy Manager with supernumerary time to assist the manager with audits and action plans, supervisions and implementing and monitoring documentation to aid continuous improvement of the Home.”

    Source location

    2021-0089-Response-from-Cole-Valley-Nursing-Home-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 March 2021

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Andrew Richard Hogg · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Andrew Richard Hogg, who had Parkinson’s disease and possible dementia, died on 6 May 2019 after a fall at Meadway Court Care Home caused a head injury and subdural haematoma. The principal concerns were the absence of adequate falls assessment, escalation, investigation and proactive measures to reduce the risk after his repeated falls.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete and update falls-related records

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence of the sequence of falls which I have recounted above. While there may have been a falls assessment when Andrew first became resident at the home, there was no evidence before me of the nature and extent of that assessment. More particularly there was no evidence of any steps taken to review or reassess the falls risk following the falls Andrew had commencing in January 2019. There were some 7 falls before his final fall and it is a matter of concern that while each seems to have been dealt with reactively in that relevant assistance was sought, there were no steps considered to address what clearly was an escalating risk. In evidence I heard from ████████ who was the manager of the home (although I accept he was only recently in post). ████████ having given evidence as to the facts above accepted that insufficient measures were taken to address the risks which were evident. In particular he identified that:- 1. Not all the relevant paperwork was completed following the falls 2. There could have been engagement with other services such as the local falls clinic 3. Consideration should have been given to using available equipment such as a sensor mat and “silent minder” 4. Relevant information should have been updated onto the patient’s electronic record. While I welcome his insightful comments I remain concerned that 1. There was no adequate falls assessment policy 2. There was no obvious escalation pathway following the sequential falls Andrew had 3. There was no internal investigation into any of the falls which occurred 4. There was no consideration of steps which could have been taken to reduce the risk, whether by way of equipment or increased or more direct care supervision. It seems to me that each incident was dealt with reactively and individually with no proactive consideration given steps which could be taken to reduce or ameliorate the risk of falling which quite obviously was increasing. While it cannot be said that had such steps been taken Andrew would not have fallen when he did, I do think that the risk of that happening would have been substantially reduced. ”

    Source location

    Andrew Richard Hogg · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review falls weekly in the PCS system, document actions, and update affected residents’ support plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, to tighten up our process all home managers will be reviewing falls on our PCS (Person Centered Software) system on a weekly basis to ensure that falls are monitored more frequently. Managers will print the falls log for the week and add notes as to what actions have been taken. These notes will also be added to the support plans of those residents involved. Collectively as a group of managers we have also agreed that any resident who has more than two falls within a two week period we will arrange a review with their GP or CPN.”

    Source location

    2019-0400-Response-from-Borough-Care-Ltd-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 December 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026