Recurring concern

Unreliable assessment of patients’ mental state

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Apr 2014•Latest report 17 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the mental-state assessment process, including delayed or missed assessment, failure to undertake an appropriate mental state examination, and materially inconsistent or inadequate assessment of mental state.

Not included

  • Excludes general mental health risk assessments unless the asserted deficiency specifically concerns assessment of the patient’s mental state.
  • Excludes failures of treatment, referral, admission, discharge or escalation where mental-state assessment is not itself the unsafe condition.
  • Excludes generic staffing, training, documentation or communication deficiencies unless they directly impair the mental-state assessment process.
  • Excludes assessments of physical condition or unrelated clinical states.
Reports
24

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
25

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
36

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care6
NHS England3
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
Greater Manchester Police2
HM Prison and Probation Service2
North London NHS Foundation Trust2
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
BTCM Limited1
Care Quality Commission1
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust1
Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust1
Cornwall Council1
Crown Prosecution Service1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Jason Pendlebury · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jason Pendlebury, a known cocaine user, fell from the roof of a block of flats on 29 September 2018 and died in hospital on 2 October 2018 after sustaining serious injuries. The principal concerns related to communication and information-sharing between Greater Manchester Police, North West Ambulance Service, the GP and mental health professionals about his potential mental health needs and risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share relevant prior mental-health contacts and assessments between GMP and NWAS

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence that between 13 August and 22 August 2018 telephone calls were made to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) on 8 separate dates by the Deceased, his wife and his business partner. On all but one of those dates those concerns related to the Deceased's mental health. Of the calls that were made by the Deceased, the call handler reached the conclusion that he had mental health issues. On 3 of the occasions, GMP referred the matter to North West Ambulance Service (NWAS) which resulted in telephone assessments by mental health nurses. The purposes of those telephone assessments was to determine whether an ambulance should attend the Deceased. On two occasions a decision was taken that no ambulance was required. On one occasion an ambulance was dispatched although the deceased refused medical assistance and was not taken to Hospital. It was not clear from the evidence that the mental health nurses carrying out the telephone assessments were aware of the number of calls that had been made to GMP or of the previous telephone assessments. None of the calls made to GMP or the fact that telephone mental health assessments had taken place was communicated to the deceased's GP. This meant that when the Deceased's wife contacted the GP on 6th September 2018 with concerns about his threats of suicide, the GP did not have all the information that he might of had to determine what action to take. I also heard that a Multi-Agency Adult Care Safeguarding Team meeting was held at Rochdale Police Station on 28th August 2018. The Approved Mental Health Professional (AMHP) who attended the meeting was not provided with the full details of the telephone calls that had been made to GMP regarding the Deceased's mental health and consequently assessed the risk of harm to himself and others as low. Had the AMHP been provided with full information, it would have automatically generated a referral to the Single Point of Access and led to the involvement of the mental health services. A further contact with GMP was made on 19th September 2018 and I heard that this triggered a referral to the mental health services. However, GMP were unable to confirm what had happened to the referral and the Mental Health Trust confirmed that they had no knowledge of any referral being made. In addition, GMP did not notify the Deceased's GP that a referral to mental health services had been made. The matters of concern relate to the quality and systems of communication regarding concerns relating to potential mental health needs between GMP and NWAS and onward communication to General Practitioners and Approved Mental Health Practitioners tasked with assessing risk levels. ”

    Source location

    Jason Pendlebury · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess the feasibility of electronic Force-to-Force data exchange between GMP and partner agencies including NWAS.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “One aspect of our ongoing IT Change Programme is the feasibility of an electronic Force to Force data exchange, which could potentially be used to share data electronically with agencies such as NWAS. It is anticipated that these advances in technology would improve the quality and efficiency of information sharing and is subject to ongoing review.”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Police_Redacted-2
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider the effectiveness of current information-sharing arrangements with partners and brief the Greater Manchester Health and Justice Board on the concerns raised.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “GMP’s Public Service Reform leads, Chief Supt. ████████ and DCI ████████ are to consider the effectiveness of the current arrangements regarding this type of information sharing with partners and the Greater Manchester Health and Justice Board will be briefed on the concerns raised here (additional information on this body is included in the Summary below).”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Police_Redacted-2
    Page 3 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement a common, documented GMP-wide procedure with partners for responding to mental-health-related risk to life presented to blue-light services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2019 The Greater Manchester Health and Justice Board oversaw work to develop and implement a common approach to people in mental health crisis. The involved a working group, Health and Justice Task and Finish Group, which included senior representatives form GMP and the North-West Ambulance Service, in addition to the mental health trusts serving Greater Manchester, local authority approved mental health practitioners and Greater Manchester Combined Authority.”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Police_Redacted-2
    Page 5 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Jointly chair a pan-Greater Manchester task and finish group improving risk assessment, management, inter-agency communications and procedures for mental health crisis responses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust jointly chaired a task and finish group with GMP, which was set up last year in response to a Regulation 28 report issued by Ms Joanne Kearsley in December 2018 to Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership, Greater Manchester Combined Authority, Greater Manchester Police, North West Ambulance Service and Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust. It was agreed that enhancements to the response around concern for welfare, and particularly risk to life, must be applied on a pan-GM basis, therefore Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and North West Boroughs Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust are also partners, despite not being involved in the specific case in question.”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-North-West-Ambulance-Service_Redacted-1
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Draw together a pan-Greater Manchester protocol defining roles, shared risk assessment, communication and escalation for mental-health-related risk-to-life incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The task and finish group has drawn together a pan-GM protocol for responding to ‘risk to life’ where it presents as a result of mental health to blue light services to achieve a common understanding of roles and responsibilities; to ensure a shared view of risk and to promote communication and escalation at the first point that a common understanding may falter.”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-North-West-Ambulance-Service_Redacted-1
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Police and other emergency services are expected to share pertinent information so ambulance clinicians can know about prior contacts and assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “When an NWAS mental health nurse carries out a telephone assessment, they would only be aware of a previous assessment by GMP or previous calls to GMP if this is communicated to NWAS by the police and documented by the call taker. GMP, and indeed any police force or emergency service, would be expected to share any information they felt to be pertinent. Once a clinician has completed an assessment, or returned the incident to dispatch if unable to carry out a triage, NWAS would not be made aware of any further updates from GMP as the clinicians no longer have sight of the incident.”

    Source location

    2020-0069-Response-from-North-West-Ambulance-Service_Redacted-1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 April 2020

    Open published response
  2. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    David Jonathon Jukes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Jonathon Jukes was declared deceased on 9 October 2018 after being found hanging from a ligature fixed to a garden gate. The report identified concerns about inadequate information sharing, mental-health assessment and follow-up, attempts to locate and engage him, risk assessment, and clinical record keeping, with associated risks to life.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide material arrest information for mental health assessments in custody

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The psychiatric liaison and diversion practitioner employed by BCPFT who attended to review Mr. Jukes in Oldbury custody suite on the 28th September 2018 did not have sufficient information about the history of arrest to inform her decision making on assessment in custody. She was provided with a print out of the first two pages of the custody record which included the statutory arrest reason and the circumstances of arrest but nothing that indicated that he had barricaded himself in the loft, threatened suicide and harm to others and not come out in response to police negotiators. This information was not included in a verbal handover according to the nurse’s evidence and there is no record of it being handed over to her. She stated in evidence that if she had been aware of the extent of the events overnight on the 27th into the 28th she would have arranged a Mental Health Act assessment when he did not engage with her. There is a risk to life if assessments of mental health in custody are not informed by material information about circumstances connected with arrest. ”

    Source location

    David Jonathon Jukes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement CONNECT access for Liaison and Diversion staff, including wider custody information and nursing read-write risk recording.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At present Liaison and Diversion (L&D) nursing staff have read access only to the current electronic custody record (ICIS) and in line with standard operational procedures are instructed to ensure checks are undertaken and all available content on ICIS is reviewed. This is further supported by obtaining a verbal update from the police. To improve”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Black-Country-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise the report’s outcome and learning with police through quarterly Joint Operational Group meetings, stressing full handover before every assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “L&D leads will raise awareness of the outcome and learning from the regulation 28 PFD report through the Joint Operational Group held with police on a quarterly basis to engage with police colleagues and stress the need for a full handover prior to assessment in each and every case.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Black-Country-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a joint operating protocol with the Sandwell Liaison and Diversion Service for custody-based patient assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are grateful to you for raising this matter with us as it has identified the need for a joint operating protocol to be developed between BSMHT and the Liaison and Diversion Service in Sandwell. We have been in liaison with this team and are scheduled to meet and develop this protocol in late September 2019.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with police forces to ensure liaison and diversion practitioners receive relevant arrest and presentation information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Sufficient information regarding arrests was not provided to liaison and diversion practitioner:”

    Source location

    2019-0220-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold a national event to debrief information-sharing issues and share lessons with liaison and diversion practitioners, commissioners and police representatives.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will commit to a national event by the end of March 2020 to debrief on this matter and any other information sharing/exchange issues that have been raised in other reports. We will invite liaison and diversion practitioners as well as NHS Commissioners and police representatives in order to share lessons learnt. Additionally, there has been work to address this concern at a regional level:”

    Source location

    2019-0220-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support development of the Connect police IT system and liaison and diversion functionality to improve custody information access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• NHS England and NHS Improvement has been working with West Midland Police regarding their new IT system (‘Connect’) which the police are implementing in the summer 2020”

    Source location

    2019-0220-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide information-sharing training to liaison and diversion teams and offer it to police healthcare providers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All liaison and diversion teams have had information sharing training and this training offer has also been made to Police Healthcare providers”

    Source location

    2019-0220-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Other concerns concerned NHS bodies and services not provided by the respondent, so the respondent did not comment on those outcomes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note that all other concerns raised within the Regulation 28 report affected other NHS bodies and services not provided by BCPFT and therefore we have not commented on these outcomes. We have however approached both BSMHT and CWPT to consider”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Black-Country-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The existing custody record and available information access adequately inform Liaison and Diversion assessments, so no future-death risk exists.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Therefore, it is submitted that some information was readily available on the custody record.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Staffordshire-and-West-Midlands-Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    An adequate system records arrest circumstances and gives Liaison and Diversion practitioners access to relevant custody information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Liaison and Diversion team can make verbal requests for further information. This would include access to the full custody record which is available in custody and would extend to call out logs and ‘crime investigation logs that can be obtained by the custody staff. It would however be unlikely to extend to all the logs.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Staffordshire-and-West-Midlands-Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No action is required because the existing system addresses the identified risk in this case.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is our position that there is an adequate system in place which ensures that the circumstances of an arrest are accurately recorded on the custody record and that a Liaison and Diversion practitioner has access to a wide range of information within the custody setting. Therefore, it is submitted that there is no risk of future death to be addressed and no action is required in this case.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Staffordshire-and-West-Midlands-Police
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local NHS agencies are expected to address the report’s local concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note this response will address the matters of concern from a national level and we would expect the local NHS agencies, which I note are copied in to the letter, to address the local concerns raised.”

    Source location

    2019-0220-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response
  3. Wiltshire and Swindon

    AI-generated summary

    Heather Birchall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Heather Birchall, who was homeless and had mental health problems and alcohol dependence, died after consuming excess amounts of medication alongside alcohol; bronchopneumonia also contributed to the mechanism of death. The principal concern was that healthcare professionals assessing people in police custody might lack relevant mental health information because of confidentiality barriers, potentially limiting informed decisions about further care and safeguarding life.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide healthcare professionals with complete relevant mental-health information for frontline assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “One of the concerns that arose relates to G4S healthcare professionals and any other healthcare professional in this situation when asked to carry out a front line assessment which could include mental health features, that those individuals may not have the fullest amount of information that is available so that they can make an informed decision as to whether or not for example further healthcare input is required, such as an example a formal mental health at assessment. Whilst a problem insofar as getting a complete picture did not seem to be quite such an issue when personnel from LADS were available it would appear that out of those hours, if a G4S healthcare professional wanted to make enquiries insofar as an individual’s mental health background which potentially might be within the knowledge of the relevant healthcare trust, that when an approach is made to the Street Triage team out of hours that more often than not the issue of confidentiality was raised to withhold information or I felt that equally there was a danger that selective information might only be passed at best to the G4S healthcare operative. The concern that I was left with was that the healthcare professionals from G4S and arguably at the end of the day Wiltshire Police who ultimately responsibility it is to safeguard life when an individual is in Police custody are effectively trying to do a job, through their contract service providers (G4S), in circumstances whereby in trying to discharge their duty having regard to Article 2 of European Convention of Human Rights they were doing so effectively, as a consequence of patient confidentiality, with one arm tied behind their back. ”

    Source location

    Heather Birchall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Barry Marshall Fullarton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barry Marshall Fullarton died on 17 December 2018 after intentionally falling from the balcony of his bedroom, while suffering from a reactive depressive illness following a stroke. The principal concern was that mental health assessments should account for how a disorder manifests over time, including the possibility that an afternoon assessment during improved mood may not reflect needs during morning low mood.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to account for how mental disorders manifest over time during mental health assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “Those carrying out mental health assessments should have regard to how a mental disorder manifests in a patient. In this case, the diurnal nature of the reactive depressive illness was evident from the medial records such that an assessor could have documented that the assessment at a particular time when mood was good may not be valid when in low mood. ”

    Source location

    Barry Marshall Fullarton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and circulate a learning bulletin on recognising diurnal mood variation and considering assessment appointments at different times.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It may not always be possible to offer appointments at different times of the day, however, given the concerns you have shared, we plan to use your helpful feedback as learning. As such, the Trust will provide further guidance to our staff regarding ways that they can consider facilitating appointments at different times of the day, through the following actions:”

    Source location

    2019-0159-Response-by-Cheshire-and-Wirral-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver a Trustwide Grand Round for clinicians to share learning and feedback about diurnal mood variation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will develop a share learning bulletin to outline the importance of responding to assessments for DMV, and include the consideration as to whether people should and could be seen at different times. This will be circulated to all our clinical teams by the end of July 2019. This will be sent directly to all staff, and will also be included in governance and team meetings. There will be a Trustwide Grand Round for all clinicians in September 2019, where this learning and feedback will be shared.”

    Source location

    2019-0159-Response-by-Cheshire-and-Wirral-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adapt Suicide Prevention Training to include diurnal mood variation when teaching about depression and mental state examination.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We produce a Trustwide Learning from Experience report three times a year, in which we plan to summarise this learning as part of that report, confirm the above actions, and follow-up their completion. The next edition, which covers the time period April July 2019, will be presented at our Trustwide Quality Committee in September 2019. This will ensure oversight of the delivery of the actions we have stated above. The Suicide Prevention Training will also be adapted to include DMV when teaching around depression and Mental State Examination.”

    Source location

    2019-0159-Response-by-Cheshire-and-Wirral-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Appointments cannot always be offered at different times of day, limiting the ability to respond to diurnal mood variation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It may not always be possible to offer appointments at different times of the day, however, given the concerns you have shared, we plan to use your helpful feedback as learning. As such, the Trust will provide further guidance to our staff regarding ways that they can consider facilitating appointments at different times of the day, through the following actions:”

    Source location

    2019-0159-Response-by-Cheshire-and-Wirral-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Jeroen ENSINK · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dr Jeroen Ensink was stabbed to death in a wholly unprovoked attack on 29 December 2015. The report identified multiple concerns involving police recording and information-sharing failures, including failures to identify and communicate possible mental health problems and issues in the handling of evidence and custody records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate mental health concerns to the forensic medical examiner

    Wider context from the report

    “8. Consequently, no mental health concerns were brought to the attention of the FME (forensic medical examiner) who examined ████████, meaning that his mental state examination was more superficial than it would otherwise have been. ”

    Source location

    Jeroen ENSINK · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Janet WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janet Williams became ill in early 2016 and received mental health care, including admission and home treatment. She died by suicide at home on 8 March 2017 while suffering late onset paranoid schizophrenia. Concerns included failures to record and monitor her care plan, insufficient reviews and medical follow-up, inadequate response to family concerns, and retrospective entries in her medical records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to investigate conflicting reports about mental health symptoms

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Ms Williams told her care co-ordinator that she was no longer hearing voices, but her daughter raised concerns that this was not true. Ms Williams’ care co-ordinator did not at any point in April 2016 or afterwards raise this with Ms Williams, but instead accepted Ms Williams’ narrative as accurate. ”

    Source location

    Janet WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Jonathan Anthony MEANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jonathan Anthony Meaney took an overdose on 13 March 2017 and was assessed at hospital, where inpatient treatment was recommended but no bed was found. He was discharged on 15 March after expressing a wish to leave and took his own life the following day; his medical cause of death was morphine and alcohol toxicity. Concerns included the prolonged wait for a bed, aspects of the pre-discharge mental health assessment, lack of consultation with another team member, and uncertainty about whether a proposed GP referral was made.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise impaired insight in the context of recurrent unexplained physical symptoms

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The mental health nurse assessed Mr Meaney as rational and having good insight, despite the fact that Mr Meaney once again (as he had done repeatedly for many months) raised a physical problem for which no organic cause had been found. In court, the mental health nurse told me that he knew that Mr Meaney’s illness was mental rather than physical. ”

    Source location

    Jonathan Anthony MEANEY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work closely with CANDI to assist its investigation, action-plan development and implementation to prevent similar incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It follows that the Matters of Concern will need to be addressed substantively by CANDI, which we note has received your Prevention of Future Deaths Report. We understand that CANDI are undertaking a Serious Incident investigation and we are committed to working closely with CANDI, as necessary, to assist them in completing this investigation, developing and implementing an action plan to prevent similar incidents in future and to otherwise assist them in preparing their response to your Prevention of Future Deaths Report. Additionally, we have asked to be provided with copies of CANDI’s final Serious Incident investigation report and response to your Prevention of Future Deaths Report, to ensure that any opportunities for learning within this Trust are captured and shared appropriately.”

    Source location

    2017-0244-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 October 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    CANDI, which employs and manages the Mental Health Liaison service, must substantively address the concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have carefully considered the Matters of Concern, all of which relate to care that was delivered by the Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust’s Mental Health Liaison service, based within the Royal Free Hospital Emergency Department. The staff working within the Mental Health Liaison service are employed by the Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust (“CANDI”), not this Trust (the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust), and CANDI manage the Mental Health Liaison service. If a patient attending the Trust’s Emergency Department is considered to have a mental health problem (pertinent to the attendance) or requires a mental health assessment, they are referred to the Mental Health Liaison service, which will then assess the patient and take responsibility for referring onwards to either CANDI’s inpatient facilities or another mental health trust, as appropriate.”

    Source location

    2017-0244-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 1 October 2017

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew Marc GROOM · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew Marc Groom stood in front of a lorry after spending seven hours in the emergency unit of Whittington Hospital, where he was seen by emergency medicine and mental health staff. Concerns included delays in his mental health assessment, prescribed diazepam not being administered, inadequate planning for his possible departure, failure to seek urgent hospital security assistance, and incomplete communication with police.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in arranging immediate mental health assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Most importantly, Matt Groom waited four hours in the emergency unit before he saw a mental healthcare professional for the first time. I heard that, at the time in these circumstances, it was not possible for a triage nurse to arrange for immediate mental health assessment. ”

    Source location

    Matthew Marc GROOM · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen the direct mental-health referral protocol, including patient-triggered referrals and a disseminated frontline flowchart.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a) We have strengthened the direct mental health referral protocol from Whittington Emergency Department (ED) triage to the Camden and Islington Mental Health Liaison Team Service, so that patients attending Whittington Emergency who need to see a mental health professional can be immediately and directly referred. This mental health referral protocol was in place before your inquest into Mr Groom’s death, but has since been significantly strengthened in that the patient themselves can now trigger a prompt and direct referral to the Mental Health Liaison Team simply by requesting this.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Groom-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen the direct mental-health referral protocol so patients can promptly trigger referral from emergency-department triage, supported by a disseminated frontline flowchart.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “a) We have strengthened the direct mental health referral protocol from Whittington Emergency (ED) triage to the Camden and Islington Mental Health Liaison Team Service, so that patients attending Whittington Emergency who need to see a mental health professional can be immediately and directly referred. This mental health referral protocol was in place before your inquest into Mr Groom’s death, but has since been significantly strengthened in that the patient themselves can now trigger a prompt and direct referral to the Mental Health Liaison Team simply by requesting this.”

    Source location

    2015-0503-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2015

    Open published response
  9. Plymouth, Torbay and South Devon

    AI-generated summary

    William John Charles Harnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William John Charles Harnell suffered a fractured left hip while attempting to mobilise from his wheelchair on 22 October 2014, remained in hospital, developed hospital-acquired pneumonia and died on 15 December 2014. Concerns included delays in recognising the difficulties surrounding his discharge, assessing his mental health, approaching suitable nursing homes, and a lack of resources and guidance for managing challenging and vulnerable patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in determining patients’ mental health state

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) There appears to have been delay in determining Mr Harnell’s state of mental health ”

    Source location

    William John Charles Harnell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with health colleagues to obtain mental health input when required in future cases.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The team in the Hospital works closely with Health colleagues to determine the appropriate care. The team will work with Health colleagues to seek mental health input as required for any future cases.”

    Source location

    william-harnell-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Robust senior management oversight is considered sufficient to prevent such delays recurring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We acknowledge that on occasion there may be delays; however with our robust Senior Management oversight I do not expect such delays in future.”

    Source location

    william-harnell-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 September 2015

    Open published response
  10. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Alice Anne McMeekin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alice Anne McMeekin was fatally attacked with a hatchet at an address in Newton Street, Millom, Cumbria, on 8 June 2013, sustaining fatal head injuries. The report raises concerns about police information not being fully shared with the ambulance and psychiatric teams, and about the assessment and discharge of the attacker despite information indicating significant risks and possible mental disorder.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of psychiatric assessments to recognise mental disorder and suicide risk

    Wider context from the report

    “2.The Partnership Trust The Coroner concluded that the evidence at the inquest showed that the perpetrator was suffering from a mental disorder when he tried to kill himself on the 6th June 2013. Whilst the psychiatric nurse that day did not have all the information which was available at the inquest he had information to show that perpetrator had a history of self-harm, unemployment, family stressors, multiple and complex drug misuse, quasi-incestuous sexual feelings, past sex abuse, hopelessness, low mood and serious suicide attempt that day. 3.Not withstanding the above the nurse decided that the perpetrator was of zero risk and was not suffering from a mental disorder. He was discharged with the only potential follow up being talking therapy which would not commence, if it ever did, some weeks hence. The evidence at inquest shows that this was a very disturbed young man having intended to kill himself 6 hours earlier and who remained a risk to himself. Whilst the information known to the nurse at the time the tragic outcome could not have been anticipated, there was an opportunity to render care, which could, as a consequence have made a difference. It is a concern that the two assessments after the killings also concluded the perpetrator was not suffering from a mental disorder. ”

    Source location

    Alice Anne McMeekin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026