Recurring concern

Failure to ensure clear and followed instructions for safe equipment use

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 15 Dec 2015•Latest report 31 Mar 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of controls specifically dedicated to safe equipment-use instructions, including provision, availability, clarity, completeness, identification of defect or hazard indications, user understanding, and monitoring or assurance of compliance, across clinical, industrial, recreational and other operational equipment.

Not included

  • Excludes generic training, supervision, documentation or compliance deficiencies that are not specifically tied to safe equipment-use instructions.
  • Excludes equipment defects, maintenance or certification failures where no instruction or instruction-compliance control is deficient.
  • Excludes clinical, referral, care or operational protocols that do not govern the safe use of equipment.
  • Excludes failures concerning the operation of a particular piece of equipment when the report does not identify an equipment-use instruction or compliance-control deficiency.
Reports
22

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
26

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2015–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
53

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care3
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency3
NHS England3
Abbeyfield The Dales Limited1
Agd Equipment Limited1
Birmingham City Council1
Boc Limited1
British Standards Institution1
Broomcroft House Care Home1
Bupa Care Homes (AKW) Limited1
Bureau Veritas UK Limited1
Care Quality Commission1
Civil Aviation Authority1
Construction Plant-hire Association1
Department for Work and Pensions1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Richard Seward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Richard Seward died after a pressurised cylinder fractured during workplace testing, ejecting debris that caused a serious head injury. Concerns included unclear definitions of pressure testing and questioned compliance with PUWER and HSE guidance, with evidence that poor practices were replicated elsewhere in the industry.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of clear operating instructions for the Enerpac pump

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) No instruction manual had been provided to AGD to give clear instruction on how the Enerpac pump should be used. ”

    Source location

    Mark Richard Seward · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

  2. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Kamrul Hassan RUBEL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kamrul Hassan RUBEL fell from a treadmill at Small Heath Wellbeing Centre on 10 August 2015, sustained a traumatic brain injury, and died despite treatment. Evidence at the inquest raised concern that gym users were not routinely required to attach the treadmill’s emergency cord and that appropriate advice and warnings should be given.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enforce use of the emergency cord

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During the inquest I heard evidence that during initial gym induction users are advised, in accordance with the manufacturer's instruction, that they attach a cord which acts as an emergency stop if anything untoward should occur. At the time in question the deceased did not attach the cord and evidence confirmed it was not normal practice for the gym to enforce use of the emergency cord. It is impossible to say whether this would have made any difference to the deceased but steps should be taken to ensure that appropriate advice and warnings are given to all users regarding the correct use of the emergency cord. ”

    Source location

    Kamrul Hassan RUBEL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026