Recurring concern

Failure of care and safety auditing to identify deficiencies

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 28 May 2014•Latest report 16 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of audits or compliance-assurance processes specifically examining care and safety records, assessments, reviews, interventions, documentation or related operational practice where the audit fails to identify a material deficiency.

Not included

  • Excludes generic weaknesses in governance, staffing, training or documentation unless the report directly ties them to failure of a care and safety audit.
  • Excludes deficiencies in the underlying care or safety process when no audit or assurance failure is identified.
  • Excludes audits of non-care public-safety activities, such as roads, signage or controlled-drug processes, unless they are explicitly part of the same care and safety auditing concern.
Reports
69

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
76

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
85

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care11
NHS England7
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust5
Care Quality Commission4
HM Prison and Probation Service4
Ministry of Justice3
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives2
Avery Healthcare Group2
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust2
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust2
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust2
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence2
Practice Plus Group2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Anthony Athias · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Anthony Athias had multiple physical and mental health issues, including recurring urinary infections and problems with a long-term catheter. After difficulties with his catheter on 2 July 2021, he was admitted to hospital, where his condition deteriorated and he died on 6 July 2021. Concerns included a lack of sterile replacement catheters, inadequate monitoring records, and a missing handover record, with risks arising from deficient record keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct sufficiently frequent checks that required records exist and are preserved

    Wider context from the report

    “4. In order to ensure instructions were complied with, and without checks to ensure the contemporaneous records required to be kept were actually being maintained, there is a risk deficient record keeping could continue. 5. Managers of nursing homes should make checks sufficiently often to ensure the records required to be kept actually exist, and that they are preserved, so as to facilitate an analysis of trends in the medical condition of patients in the care of the nursing home ”

    Source location

    Mark Anthony Athias · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Digitise EQA governance and establish team-leader accountability, daily management reviews, clinical walkarounds, take-twenty meetings and electronic quality-assurance tracking.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to these management changes, specific steps have also been taken to ensure greater management overview, and quality assurance, of record keeping and documentation. During Mr Athias' residence at Copperfields the relevant governance processes (EQA- External Quality Assurance) were paper based. However, the majority of the EQA processes have now been moved to a digital platform.”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Preserve handover records through electronic monthly files, printed management-office copies, archiving and monthly completeness checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You heard evidence from Ms ████████ that Exemplar Health Care had changed its system to use word templates across the entire organisation. It is therefore no longer possible for documents such as handovers to be overwritten. In addition, each handover is now saved electronically in a specific month document file and a copy is printed off and retained in the management office at Copperfields in paper form with a date tracker.”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement monthly audits of supplementary and care files, with findings discussed with unit managers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “9. Copperfields has implemented monthly auditing of supplementary and care files and findings are discussed with individual unit managers.”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing management oversight, quality assurance and governance processes are considered sufficient to ensure records are kept, retained and reviewed for trends.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have detailed above the relevant management structure changes and quality assurance systems in place to ensure that all record keeping is appropriate and accurate. In summary:”

    Source location

    2022-0024-Response-from-Exemplar-Health-Care_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 January 2022

    Open published response
  2. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Jude Daryl Lloyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jude Daryl Lloyd was found dead at home on 8 May 2019 and died from diabetic ketoacidosis. The report identified concerns about inadequate diabetes monitoring and management, capacity assessment, communication and care transfer between services, follow-up with primary care, clinical review, and record keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a robust audit system for compliance with policies and protocols

    Wider context from the report

    “h. There was no robust audit system for checking compliance with the Trusts own policies and protocols in particular with regard to medical record keeping, risk assessments and reviews. ”

    Source location

    Jude Daryl Lloyd · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing supervision and clinical-record audit processes are relied upon to monitor compliance with record-keeping, risk-assessment and review requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(h) There was no robust audit system for checking compliance with the Trusts own policies and protocols in particular with regard to medical record keeping, risk assessments and reviews.”

    Source location

    2021-0329-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 October 2021

    Open published response
  3. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Antony Declan Schofield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Antony Declan Schofield, who had recurrent depressive disorder and a history of suicidal thoughts and behaviour, was found dead at home on 27 August 2019 after taking an overdose. The report identified concerns about incomplete risk assessment before discharge, inadequate transfer and communication to the community team, insufficient review of escalating suicide risk, missed opportunities to assess changes in presentation, and deficiencies in records, auditing and the subsequent investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of robust audit of compliance with policies for record keeping, risk assessments and reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “1. a. No thorough comprehensive risk review was undertaken by a member of staff who had detailed knowledge of the deceased prior to his discharge from the inpatient unit. This was not identified before he left the ward and it was not discovered by the HBTT when they took over his care. b. The transfer and communication process from inpatient care to the HBTT appeared inadequate. b. There was no clear plan to deal with the risk of his condition deteriorating and him experiencing significantly more suicidal thoughts as well as obtaining the means by which to kill himself. It is well known that a history of suicidal thoughts and actions increases the risk when they are repeated. c. When he disclosed that he bought ████████ there was no risk review planning involving a senior HBTT clinician which was then monitored even when he indicated that he had received it. d. On several occasions before he died the deceased saw members of the HBTT but they failed to demonstrate professional curiosity and enquire about his suicidal thoughts and plans. There were either adequate or no records about this. e. There were a number of missed opportunities for the HBTT to assess changes in his presentation and risk profile. f. There was no robust audit system for checking compliance with the trust own policies and protocols in particular with regard to medical record keeping, risk assessments and reviews. g. The GMMH SUI investigation report contained several factual errors and misinterpretations. It was only discovered at the inquest hearing that one of the last members of HBTT staff to see the deceased had given an account that was not the same as given to their line manager. This meant the all the lessons for future care and planning were not learnt. There was inadequate overview of the report before it was signed off. ”

    Source location

    Antony Declan Schofield · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct quarterly audits of discharge checklists and processes to verify completion and uploading to clinical records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is a discharge checklist that prompts the activities to be completed before and upon discharge that is scanned into the patient clinical record on completion. This checklist identifies that the Star V2 Risk Assessment should be reviewed and updated prior to discharge. The manager of the ward will undertake a quarterly audit on the checklists and discharge process to provide assurance that they are being completed and uploaded to the patient clinical record.”

    Source location

    2021-0324-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require senior staff to review selected clinical notes before supervision sessions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All staff have undergone training in respect of what they should be addressing in an HBTT contact and how this should be recorded and have received support from senior colleagues to embed the process. Since the introduction of the structured note the Team Manager has put into place a process whereby senior undertaking supervision select notes to review prior to the staff members supervision, as per Trust Supervision Policy. There is also a quarterly audit planned to be undertaken across the team in respect of record keeping providing assurance that this structured note is being adhered to and record keeping is in line with Trust policy. The Trust Clinical risk policy and training has been updated to reflect the use of professional curiosity, this training is mandatory and all staff should attend the training every three years as a minimum.”

    Source location

    2021-0324-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 5 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct quarterly team audits of record keeping and compliance with procedures and clinical risk policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All staff have undergone training in respect of what they should be addressing in an HBTT contact and how this should be recorded and have received support from senior colleagues to embed the process. Since the introduction of the structured note the Team Manager has put into place a process whereby senior undertaking supervision select notes to review prior to the staff members supervision, as per Trust Supervision Policy. There is also a quarterly audit planned to be undertaken across the team in respect of record keeping providing assurance that this structured note is being adhered to and record keeping is in line with Trust policy. The Trust Clinical risk policy and training has been updated to reflect the use of professional curiosity, this training is mandatory and all staff should attend the training every three years as a minimum.”

    Source location

    2021-0324-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 5 October 2021

    Open published response
  4. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Hazel Ann Binks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hazel Binks died on 14 January 2021 after placing a fastened plastic bag over her head, following earlier preparations to asphyxiate herself and leaving a farewell note. The principal concerns were that information about her suicidal thoughts was not passed from the GP practice administration to the GP, that the GP did not undertake a meaningful mental health or risk assessment, and that the practice’s internal review did not identify these issues.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficiently robust internal reviews failing to identify and address important patient safety issues

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The GP practice undertook an internal review of Dr ████████ consultation after Hazel’s death (a Significant Event Analysis). This was attended by GP partners and the practice manager. The review did not identify that the GP practice admin did not pass on the concerns of suicidal thoughts to the GP. The review did not identify any insufficiency in Dr ████████ mental health or risk assessment of Hazel. I am concerned that the GP practice may not be undertaking sufficiently robust internal reviews, and consequently is not recognising and addressing important issues in patient provision of safety and is not taking necessary corrective action, that the CCG will wish to consider these concerns given the CCG’s relationship with GP practices within its area. ”

    Source location

    Hazel Ann Binks · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Mid Kent and Medway

    AI-generated summary

    Catherine Jux · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Catherine Jux died aged 86 on 5 April 2021 while being transported to hospital by ambulance after choking on food at Elvy Court Nursing Home. The substantive concerns were that a risk assessment was not completed within 24 hours of admission, staff did not identify this omission, and the home lacked an adequate auditing process for completed assessments.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate auditing of assessment completion

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was given by Nursing Home manager and Nursing staff at the Elvy Court Nursing Home that: (1) Due to an oversight by the home a risk assessment was not completed within 24 hours of the patient being admitted to the home. (2) None of the Care Home staff who attended to the patient and who would refer to this risk assessment to assess a patient’s daily needs and requirements noticed the oversight in respect of this. (3) There is not an adequate process in place for auditing that assessments have been completed particularly given the homes policy that they are completed within 24 hours of admission. ”

    Source location

    Catherine Jux · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Jason O’Rourke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jason O’Rourke died by suicide in his cell at HMP Belmarsh after hanging himself with a bedsheet ligature between 7.28 pm on 1 April 2019 and 9.33 am on 2 April 2019. The jury identified possible contributing factors including inadequate follow-up of his mental health, insufficient sharing and understanding of information about his mental health and self-harm history, and inadequate safety intervention meetings. The report also raised concerns about unclear self-harm and suicide risk assessments on arrival and the lack of robust auditing of nightly roll checks.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of robust management audit of nightly roll checks

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The nightly roll checks at HMP Belmarsh are due to be carried out by a single member of Operational Support Grade (OSG) staff at 9.00 pm and 6.00 am. Their stated purpose is to check for escape or death among the prisoners. On handing over to the morning staff, the OSG signs paperwork indicating that the roll checks have been completed. There is no robust system by which the prison management audit this process. This means that the prison management can be under the impression that the checks have been carried out, when they have not been, as occurred here. ”

    Source location

    Jason O’Rourke · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require a discipline officer to remain on the wing until each night OSG roll check is completed, recorded, signed and reported, with spot checks of compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

    Source location

    2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the quality-assurance processes for roll checks with the LTHSE safety team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

    Source location

    2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Visit Belmarsh to identify further roll-check improvements and test compliance with the new process and Local Security Strategy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the light of the concerns that you have expressed, the Governor of HMP Belmarsh is working with the Long Term and High Security Estate (LTHSE) safety team to review the quality assurance processes in place for roll checks. As a first step, a system has been implemented whereby when a night OSG arrives a discipline officer remains on the wing until a full roll check has been completed, recorded and signed for on the wing and reported to the Orderly Officer. Spot checks are in place to ensure that the process is being followed. The LTHSE safety team will be visiting Belmarsh to identify further opportunities for improvement and to test compliance with this new process, and the LSS more generally.”

    Source location

    2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine CCTV monitoring cannot be used to assure roll checks because CCTV is authorised only for specified safety, security or investigative circumstances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I understand that the question of using CCTV for assurance was explored at the inquest. CCTV is deployed in prisons for reasons of safety and security and not for general surveillance or monitoring staff performance. Playback of CCTV coverage is only authorised in certain circumstances, such as where there is reason to believe that safety or security has been compromised, or to assist with a formal investigation. Where there is suspicion that roll checks are not being carried out, CCTV could be used as part of an investigation into those suspicions, but it cannot routinely be monitored as part of the assurance process. Staff are aware that CCTV is in use around the establishment and that their actions may be scrutinised following an incident such as a death in custody.”

    Source location

    2021-0032-Response-from-HMPPS-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 February 2021

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Cyril Cheetham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Cyril Cheetham, aged 91 and resident in a care home, became unwell on 20.02.19, was admitted to hospital later that day, placed on an end-of-life pathway, and died on 25.02.19. The principal concern was that unclear responsibility between Mastercall and his own GP resulted in no same-day GP attendance, alongside concerns that the ATT service lacked adequate auditing and that its triage arrangements could delay hospital admission and contribute to future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of adequate audit of the Alternative to Transfer service’s net benefit and adverse outcomes

    Wider context from the report

    “The ATT services introduces an additional layer of triage based on a telephone conversation between a clinician at Mastercall and someone at the care home, who may be a carer or a nurse, and may be experienced or inexperienced, rather than that person calling 999. It is of concern to me that this additional layer may result in a delay in admission, which for an elderly patient with likely co-morbidities, will affect their prospects. It was accepted that there was no audit or research carried out in respect of any deaths arising from delay in admission where the ATT service was used. The net benefit seems to have been calculated by reference to resource savings alone. I am concerned that the ATT service is being resourced and provided (nationally) without any adequate or true audit of its perceived net benefit, and that its use may be costing lives, either at all or at an unacceptable level. ”

    Source location

    Cyril Cheetham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a full audit of the Alternative to Transfer service to assess whether it delivers safe, high-quality patient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Nevertheless, I am pleased to be informed that Mastercall has undertaken to conduct a full audit of the ATT service to ensure it is delivering high-quality, safe services to patients. In”

    Source location

    2021-0022-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Clinical commissioning groups are responsible for planning, commissioning, monitoring and assuring local out-of-hours health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It may be helpful if I begin by explaining that the planning and commissioning of local health services in England is the responsibility of clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), which have the knowledge of their local population healthcare needs and can design services to meet those needs. This includes out-of-hours services. It is the responsibility of CCGs to monitor and assure the delivery of services in line with agreed service specifications.”

    Source location

    2021-0022-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing contract monitoring, eligibility guidance and senior-clinician triage were considered adequate, with no significant concerns identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that the Stockport CCG has provided a response to you explaining the regular contract monitoring that is in place with Mastercall, the provider of the ‘Alternative to Transfer’ (ATT) service, and confirming that no significant concerns have been identified by the CCG. I am further advised that clear guidance is in place in relation to the patients that meet the criteria for the service and that calls to the service are triaged by senior clinicians.”

    Source location

    2021-0022-Response-from-Dept-of-Health-and-Social-Care-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 February 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unable to comment on national evaluation of the ATT service, while providing information about local evaluation and monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst I am unable to comment on any national evaluation I am able to provide information and reassurance in relation to local evaluation and monitoring of the ATT service in Stockport.”

    Source location

    2021-0022-Response-from-Stockport-CCG-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 February 2021

    Open published response
  8. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    June Patricia Margaret PARLOUR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Parlour was an inpatient with disseminated terminal cancer when she received morphine doses exceeding national and hospital guidelines. Her condition deteriorated, and she later died of opiate toxicity; the overdose significantly hastened her death. Concerns included staff awareness of morphine guidance, inaccurate hospital guidance and incident reporting, education and auditing for doctors, unclear prescribing instructions, and communication and escalation failures between staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to audit education on safe morphine doses

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) I am concerned as to the adequacy of education re safe morphine doses that newly qualified doctors and locum doctors receive, and how this is audited. ”

    Source location

    June Patricia Margaret PARLOUR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Theresa Robertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Theresa Robertson was found deceased outside 90 Greengate Street on the evening of 18 September 2019, after being captured on CCTV in the area two days earlier. The medical cause of death was recorded as Amitriptyline and Zopiclone toxicity and hypothermia. Concerns included missing records of important telephone calls and a consultation, prescriptions exceeding the surgery’s seven-day limit for high-risk patients, and the absence of assurance that other patients’ prescriptions had been audited.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to audit patient records for prescribing outside surgery policy

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Dr ████████ could not reassure the Court that any steps had been taken to audit the patient records to determine whether any other high risk patients were receiving prescriptions outside of the constraints of the surgery policy. ”

    Source location

    Theresa Robertson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Mildred Horrex · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mildred Horrex suffered an unwitnessed fall while sleeping in a chair at Pelham House on 30 December 2017, sustaining fractures to her C1 and C2 vertebrae, and died in hospital on 18 January 2018. The concerns identified were poor and sometimes inaccurate record keeping, insufficient information for an adequate fall-risk assessment, and discrepancies between medication records and the amount of medication held that were not detected by audits.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of monthly medication audits to detect recording discrepancies

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Whilst the drugs chart showed that Mildred was taking her medication regularly the amount of medication that was found after her death showed that this could not be the case. We were told that monthly drugs audits were apparently carried out but they did not pick up the discrepancies in the recording on the drugs charts and the amount of medication held. ”

    Source location

    Mildred Horrex · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Employ an external auditor to conduct monthly care-plan and medication audits and provide additional advice when needed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “to highlight and family members are now signing the pre-assessment forms to agree to what has been documented) family members continue to sit with management and go through the individuals life and health history the family still continue to assist with the care planning with the individual present so we can get a good understanding of need, we also now have recorded calls something that would have been very beneficial at the time of the MH arrival and passing, we also have a new care plan system that is recognised by CQC and this is working very well and has all information risk assessments and an audit trail, it allows a gateway should relatives wish to log in and see what’s happening on a daily basis, Pelham house also employs an external auditor who comes to audit monthly and sooner where needed and is always available for advice all care plans and risk assessments are reviewed”

    Source location

    2020-0126-Response-from-Pelham-House.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct monthly medication audits with internal management oversight, visible summaries, and external review of medication administration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “POINT 2 medication Medication is audited monthly CCG / Kamsons pharmacy myself and the GP have worked together to ensure safe practices are ongoing. Home manager Audits internally alongside the deputy manager and there is a visible summary at the end of the audit to highlight any potential concerns. External auditor also audits medication and administration when he visits. There is ongoing support from the CCG and Kamsons pharmacy After a request from myself GPs now provide patient summaries for all residents that are currently in Pelham house and coming in to Pelham house.”

    Source location

    2020-0126-Response-from-Pelham-House.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 August 2020

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026