Recurring concern

Failure of hospital discharge-summary processes to provide accurate, complete and timely information to GPs

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 14 Jan 2014•Latest report 3 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes dedicated failures of the hospital discharge-summary process that affect the accuracy, completeness, finalisation, quality assurance or timely transmission of summaries to GPs.

Not included

  • Excludes generic IT, staffing, training or documentation deficiencies not explicitly tied to the hospital discharge-summary process.
  • Excludes failures concerning other clinical documents or information-sharing processes that are not discharge summaries.
  • Excludes downstream failures by GPs or other recipients to review or act on a discharge summary after it has been received.
Reports
26

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
32

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
54

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust2
Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Care Quality Commission1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Dudley Integrated Health and Care NHS Trust1
Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust1
Isle of Wight NHS Trust1
Kent and Medway Mental Health NHS Trust1
King's College Hospital1
King'S College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Isle of Wight

    AI-generated summary

    Natalie Zara HUNTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Natalie Zara HUNTER, who had a history of mental health and alcohol-related problems and 18 previous serious suicide attempts, was found deceased in her apartment on 16 March 2018 after suspending herself by a ligature. The report raised concerns about delayed or missing discharge summaries from the Isle of Wight NHS Trust, affecting continuity of GP and mental health care, and about insufficient out-of-hours mental health and crisis staffing on the Isle of Wight.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide timely Discharge Summaries to GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Natalie HUNTER’s GP, ████████ gave live evidence about Miss HUNTER’s 18 previous serious attempts to take her life. During the course of his evidence he referred to the lack of Discharge Summaries from the Isle of Wight NHS Trust. He said it is not uncommon for a Discharge Summary not to be sent to a GP’s practice by the IOW NHS Trust, or if it is sent, for it to be sent very late after the patient has been discharged from the Trust. 2. ████████ raised concerns about this as the Discharge Summary should contain details of why the patient was admitted; what care they received during their time at the IOW NHS Trust; what medication they were prescribed, and whether such medication was intended to be continued; and whether there were going to require ongoing care/treatment as a result of this admission/treatment. 3. If no Discharge Summary is received, it has a big impact on the care that GPs are able to offer to their patients and the continuity of care which is needed, particularly in relation to mental health input. 4. On several occasions, ████████ had been unaware of the nature of the admissions (which were almost all linked to her serious suicidal attempts) – and significantly the ongoing risk of further attempts on Miss HUNTER’s life as he had either not received a Discharge Summary or had received it too late for it to have any meaningful input into Miss HUNTER’s care. ”

    Source location

    Natalie Zara HUNTER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a Medical Director-led workstream to improve the quality and timeliness of discharge summaries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust fully accepts that there have been issues with discharge summaries across the organisation, and confirms that a work stream lead by the Medical Director is in place to improve the quality and timeliness of the discharge summary.”

    Source location

    2018-0392-Isle-of-Wight-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct an in-depth review of discharge summaries and communications to GPs following relevant mental health contacts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The action plan sets out the expectation that Mental Health Services will conduct an in depth review of the current situation and include the quality of other communication that is sent to GPs to inform them of patients contact with the services.”

    Source location

    2018-0392-Isle-of-Wight-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Map communication processes with staff groups and develop a standard operating procedure or flowchart.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The backdrop – process mapping with all staff groups and from this a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP)/flowchart will be developed.”

    Source location

    2018-0392-Isle-of-Wight-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit discharge-summary quality, including admission reasons, care received, and medication reviews or changes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• An audit into quality of discharge summaries to ensure they contain the reason for admission, care and treatment received during the episode of care and detail of any medication review or changes.”

    Source location

    2018-0392-Isle-of-Wight-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use formal teaching sessions with junior doctors to embed learning from the discharge-summary audit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The audit will be led by a Consultant Psychiatrist and will engage Junior Doctors at formal teaching sessions to ensure that learning outcomes are embedded.”

    Source location

    2018-0392-Isle-of-Wight-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Present discharge-summary audit outcomes at Trust quality forums to share learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The outcome of the audit will be presented at quality forums across the Trust to share the learning from this evidence”

    Source location

    2018-0392-Isle-of-Wight-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 May 2019

    Open published response
  2. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Emmett Alexander Gillah · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emmett Alexander Gillah had a history of mental illness and was discharged from mental health services at his own request. He later moved onto railway tracks and died after being struck by a train. Concerns included inadequate discharge information and follow-up arrangements, insufficient communication with his family and GP, and failures to refer him to mental health services when his mental health deteriorated.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient detail in discharge letters for GPs

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The discharge letter written by KMPT on 24 April 2015 addressed to Mr Gillah, copied to his GP contained insufficient detail to assist Mr Gillah’s GP to either understand the circumstances of Mr Gillah’s discharge or the nature of the care delivered to Mr Gillah by KMPT, including the diagnosis of his mental illness. ”

    Source location

    Emmett Alexander Gillah · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Doris Mary Ridgwell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Doris Mary Ridgwell was admitted to hospital with knee swelling and pain, with an INR of 8.1 that was not successfully communicated to the ward or acted upon before her discharge. She was later admitted with a large subdural haematoma and intraventricular bleed, and the inquest determined that she died as a consequence of over-anticoagulation. Concerns included unclear procedures for communicating abnormal coagulation results, delays in making results available to healthcare professionals, and discharge summaries that did not include blood test results.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Omission of blood test results from discharge summaries

    Wider context from the report

    “The Discharge summaries provided to GPs following discharge from Hospital do not include blood tests results, meaning a potential safeguard to check these results is missed; ”

    Source location

    Doris Mary Ridgwell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Including hospital blood results in discharge summaries is not considered necessary because GPs can access those results through Telepath.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The possibility of including blood results from hospitals within hospital discharge summaries was discussed with a GP representative from the local area at the Clinical Quality Review Group on 24 May 2018. They did not feel they would be able to review blood results within patient’s discharge summaries. Moreover, it is not felt that it would be appropriate to rely on GP’s to act as a potential safeguard for abnormal results. Blood results taken in hospital can be accessed by GP’s via a computerised patient management system, Telepath.”

    Source location

    2018-0151-Response-by-Epsom-St-Helier-University-Hospital
    Page 5 · response
    Published 8 July 2018

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Janet Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janet Hall died after a series of hospital admissions and attendances, with the medical cause described as acute left ventricular failure and B Cell lymphoma on a background of ischaemic heart disease. A principal concern was that an Emergency Department discharge letter stated that blood tests were normal, although her full blood count was abnormal, and that discharge letters did not routinely include complete blood results, limiting opportunities for GPs to identify trends.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately transcribe significant individual results into discharge letters

    Wider context from the report

    “Following Mrs Hall’s attendance at the Royal Oldham Emergency Department, a letter was written to her GP which included the text ‘Bloods and ECG all normal’. The evidence before the court was that contrary to this statement, Mrs Hall’s full blood count was, in fact, abnormal, with a slightly low haemoglobin at 96 grams / litre. ████████ Consultant in Emergency Medicine, explained in his evidence that in contrast to other systems which operate across the Trust whereby complete sets of results are automatically incorporated into discharge letters, the Emergency Department system is currently predicated on junior doctors accurately transcribing significant individual results. In addition to increasing the chances for errors of the sort that occurred in this case, it is a matter of concern that the absence of a complete set of blood results in discharge letters reduces the potential for GPs to compare results with others on their own systems, reducing the opportunity for trend analysis. ”

    Source location

    Janet Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include a complete set of blood results in discharge letters

    Wider context from the report

    “Following Mrs Hall’s attendance at the Royal Oldham Emergency Department, a letter was written to her GP which included the text ‘Bloods and ECG all normal’. The evidence before the court was that contrary to this statement, Mrs Hall’s full blood count was, in fact, abnormal, with a slightly low haemoglobin at 96 grams / litre. ████████ Consultant in Emergency Medicine, explained in his evidence that in contrast to other systems which operate across the Trust whereby complete sets of results are automatically incorporated into discharge letters, the Emergency Department system is currently predicated on junior doctors accurately transcribing significant individual results. In addition to increasing the chances for errors of the sort that occurred in this case, it is a matter of concern that the absence of a complete set of blood results in discharge letters reduces the potential for GPs to compare results with others on their own systems, reducing the opportunity for trend analysis. ”

    Source location

    Janet Hall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret Jean Silver · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Jean Silver, an 85-year-old resident of a care home, developed pulmonary emboli after Rivaroxaban was discontinued following contradictory medication instructions in her hospital discharge summary. She later experienced reduced mobility, sustained a fractured femur in an assisted fall, developed a chest infection, and died in hospital. Concerns included contradictory discharge medication information, failure to identify that Rivaroxaban had been discontinued, and failures in communicating and implementing recommended discharge support and equipment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of hospital discharge-summary procedures to provide accurate and consistent prescribed-medication information

    Wider context from the report

    “- Current procedures may result in inaccurate or contradictory information about prescribed medication being included in hospital discharge summaries. ”

    Source location

    Margaret Jean Silver · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend the discharge-letter template to consolidate medication information and instruct junior doctors to keep medication instructions in that section.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trusts discharge letter template is to be amended to enhance safety associated with the generation and consequently improve end-user clarity regarding medications. All information pertaining to medications will be included in the same section on the discharge letter. An instruction note to be added to inform the Junior Doctors that all medication instructions should be confined to the medication section on the letter.”

    Source location

    2018-0002-Response-by-Ashford-and-St-Peters-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response
  6. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Ms Penelope Benton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ms Penelope Benton, who had a history of paranoid schizophrenia, self-harm and significant pain, died on 12 July 2017 after taking a significant quantity of Tramadol. The principal concern was that her previous Tramadol overdose was not recorded in the hospital discharge letter and was therefore not communicated to her GP, who continued prescribing Tramadol.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate previous tramadol overdose information to the General Practitioner on the hospital discharge letter

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Evidence emerged during the inquest that the General Practitioner wasn’t made aware of the previous tramadol overdose on the discharge letter from Hospital. ”

    Source location

    Ms Penelope Benton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review standards for discharge communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a Trust which constantly looks to improve its services and learn lessons from incidents, the Trust will conduct a review of its standards around discharging communications and reiterate the importance to medical staff that incidents and risk factors are included within discharge letters where this is necessary.”

    Source location

    2017-0349-Response-by-Dudley-and-Walsall-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reiterate to medical staff the importance of including necessary incidents and risk factors in discharge letters.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a Trust which constantly looks to improve its services and learn lessons from incidents, the Trust will conduct a review of its standards around discharging communications and reiterate the importance to medical staff that incidents and risk factors are included within discharge letters where this is necessary.”

    Source location

    2017-0349-Response-by-Dudley-and-Walsall-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree required audit frequency and standards for discharge communication, then communicate them to medical teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It should also be noted that consultant teams also undertake audits in relation to the quality of discharge letters and communication with GPs to ensure / monitor the quality of discharge communication and ensure that the standard of these letters remains high. A required frequency / standard of audit and checking will be agreed as part of this review”

    Source location

    2017-0349-Response-by-Dudley-and-Walsall-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Matthew Robert Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Matthew Robert Edwards was found dead at home on 25 September 2016 after attending hospital twice with chest pain and being referred for further tests. The report identified concerns about delayed dispatch of his discharge summary, failure to arrange follow-up investigations and appointments, and a delay in obtaining a CT angiogram due to a shortage of slots.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in dispatching discharge summaries

    Wider context from the report

    “1.Matthew Edwards was discharged from Tameside Hospital in February 2016. The discharge summary was not dispatched until July 2016. The evidence was that this was not a one off difficulty and that a significant backlog had developed with discharge summaries routinely being dispatched many months after discharge. As a result, Matthew Edwards GP was not notified about his period as an in patient. When he attended a subsequent GP appointment, she was unclear about the discharge plan for Mr Edwards and the rationale for it. ”

    Source location

    Matthew Robert Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deploy additional resources to clear the discharge-summary backlog and restore timely completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to bring the position back to a baseline from which the Trust could confidently move forwards with new processes, extra resources were brought in to clear a backlog that had regrettably developed with discharge summaries. I wish to assure you that the Trust fully recognises the importance of discharge summaries as a handover of care between different organisations and services involved in the care of a patient. I was disappointed to learn that a backlog had developed due to other organisational pressures and asked my Executive team to take immediate steps to identify the source of the problem and remedy it as swiftly as possible.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Edwards-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 17 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement bespoke electronic casualty-card software to generate and send Emergency Department discharge summaries electronically in near real time.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that a new process is to be put in place for the discharge of patients from the Emergency Department. The Trust is implementing its plan to introduce new bespoke software to enable the production of an electronic casualty card, to replace the current handwritten casualty cards produced by the team in the Emergency Department. This will mean that the key data from the electronic casualty card will be used to create a discharge summary which will be electronically sent to the patient’s GP practice in near real time. It is anticipated that this will ensure that a discharge summary is completed for every patient seen within the Emergency Department without increasing the burden on the clinical teams.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Edwards-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen discharge-summary governance through designated clinical and operational leadership, reiterated consultant accountability, compliance monitoring and ward-level safety-net alerts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Divisional Director of Operations for Adult Medicine has been tasked with leading on this issue, with support from Brendan Ryan, Medical Director. The responsibility to ensure that every patient has a discharge summary rests with the Consultant responsible for that episode of care, and this has been reiterated to all consultants. Compliance is being monitored by the Trust's Service Quality & Operational Governance Group (SQOGG), and the Clinical Directors and Directorate Managers are providing leadership on this issue to ensure that improvements are made and maintained.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Edwards-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing discharge-summary safety mechanisms are considered sufficient to prevent recurrence of the identified individual human error.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This issue arose in the context of a particular and historical set of circumstances, in which a discharge summary was not completed for some five months following discharge. The junior member of medical staff completing the discharge summary made an assumption that the follow up actions would have taken place some months previously, and which has since been acknowledged as an incorrect assumption. This was an individual human error, which has been the subject of reflection and development on the part of the junior member of medical staff concerned.”

    Source location

    Matthew-Edwards-Response
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2017

    Open published response
  8. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Constance Connolly · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Constance Connolly died at home on 8 March 2016 from disseminated Nocardia infection, with severe chronic obstructive airways disease also recorded. She declined hospital admission, and planned outpatient investigations were not completed. The report identified concerns about inadequate follow-up, failures in handover and communication, incomplete discharge information, and the failure to arrange a replacement scan appointment, describing these as a system failure in urgent follow-up after discharge from A&E.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document significant findings and required follow-up investigations in discharge information

    Wider context from the report

    “There are four matters in the circumstances which cause concern 1. The doctor who ordered the scan did not conduct any follow up to see that it had been performed. The consultant chest physician said that handover of care was dangerous time and that it was his duty to do so. 2. The referring doctor notified the GSTT community palliative care team of the need to organize a MRI scan, on the understanding that the team was taking over care. The consultant in the palliative care team explained that their role was to advise the doctor responsible for care, which was at the time, the general practitioner. The referring doctor did not inform the general practitioner. 3. The discharge note to the GP from the A&E indicated a diagnosis of stroke (presumed before CT scan), did not mention the CT finding of cerebral lesions that may be metastases, nor the need for EMI scan and further investigation to conform diagnosis, nor the booking of a MRI scan 4. A member of the palliative care team rang the A&E department and was told that the scan appointment was the next day (17th). When the patient and her mother attended the next day, she was told that there was no appointment. Evidence was heard that the booking, which was on the basis of being an in-patient, is automatically cancelled if the patient becomes an out-patient and the clinical referral cannot be transferred to an outpatient appointment. A new referral and form needed to be completed. So the patient went home, and no further appointment was made. The above evidence suggests a system failure in handover of patients who leave A&E with the need for urgent follow up. ”

    Source location

    Constance Connolly · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send formal discharge notifications to GPs after self-discharge, including relevant tests, assessments and follow-up arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Steps have been taken to ensure that regardless of patients self-discharging, a formal Discharge Notification is always sent to a patient’s GP, setting out all relevant tests/assessments performed and any follow-up arrangements if applicable. Responsibility sits with the admitting Consultant and Ward Managers, and this will be included in the junior doctors’ induction information package.”

    Source location

    2017-0201-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement mandatory suspected and confirmed diagnoses, author and senior clinician fields on Emergency Department discharge letters to GPs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There is currently a national recommendation from the Royal College of Emergency Medicine to improve and standardise communication from all Emergency Departments to GPs by October 2017 (the “ECDS” or Emergency Care Data Set). The ED’s IT team are working to implement this and this will include a mandatory ‘suspected and confirmed diagnoses’ step on all ED discharge letters to GPs with details of who wrote the discharge notification and the identity of the senior clinician overseeing the patient’s care.”

    Source location

    2017-0201-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a Trust-wide best-practice guide for discharge notifications and clinic letters, including self-discharge requirements, with local CCG collaboration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Trust is developing a Trust-wide best practice guide on Discharge Notification and clinic letter writing for clinical staff, in collaboration with the local CCGs. This will include clarification that a discharge notification is required for all patients who self-discharge.”

    Source location

    2017-0201-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Upgrade the Emergency Department tracking system to distinguish completed, booked and pending investigations on GP discharge notifications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The ED tracking system (Symphony) is planned for an upgrade, which is due by October 2017. This will enable ED GP Discharge Notifications to highlight and distinguish which investigations have been done (ideally with a result if verified), which are booked and which are still pending.”

    Source location

    2017-0201-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns raised did not cause or contribute to the death, and the inquest found no failures of care contributed to it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a preliminary point, we note that none of the concerns raised in the Report caused or contributed to Mrs Connolly’s death in light of the Conclusion reached at the Inquest hearing on 24 May 2017, namely “Natural causes contributed to by unintended consequences of necessary medical treatment”. The Report in particular states that no failures of care contributed to Mrs Connolly’s death.”

    Source location

    2017-0201-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2017

    Open published response
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Derrick Lawrence Brocklehurst · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derrick Lawrence Brocklehurst was admitted to hospital after being found immobile and incontinent at home, with grade 4 pressure ulcers, and died on 2 December 2016 from a pulmonary embolus. Concerns included missing records of carer visits and the absence of a discharge summary from the hospital to the GP after his A&E attendance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide discharge summaries to GPs after emergency department attendance

    Wider context from the report

    “2. No discharge summary was provided by Tameside General Hospital to the GP after the deceased was seen in A and E. ”

    Source location

    Derrick Lawrence Brocklehurst · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deploy additional resource to clear the discharge-summary backlog.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to bring the position back to a baseline from which the Trust could confidently move forwards with new processes, extra resource was brought in to clear a backlog that had developed with discharge summaries. I wish to assure you that the Trust fully recognises the importance of timely completion of discharge summaries as a handover of care between different organisations and services involved in the care of a patient. I was disappointed to learn that a backlog had developed due to other organisational pressures and asked my executive team to take immediate steps to identify the source of the problem and remedy it as swiftly as possible.”

    Source location

    2017-0181-Response-by-Tameside-Glossop-Integrated-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assign divisional operational leadership for improving discharge-summary completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ Divisional Director of Operations for Adult Medicine has been tasked with leading on this issue, with support from ████████, Medical Director. The responsibility to ensure that every patient has a discharge summary rests with the consultant responsible for that episode of care and this has been reiterated to all consultants. Compliance is being monitored by the Trust’s Service Quality & Operational Governance Group (SQOGG), and the Clinical Directors and Directorate Managers are providing leadership on this issue to ensure that improvements are made.”

    Source location

    2017-0181-Response-by-Tameside-Glossop-Integrated-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reiterate consultants’ responsibility for ensuring every patient receives a discharge summary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ Divisional Director of Operations for Adult Medicine has been tasked with leading on this issue, with support from ████████, Medical Director. The responsibility to ensure that every patient has a discharge summary rests with the consultant responsible for that episode of care and this has been reiterated to all consultants. Compliance is being monitored by the Trust’s Service Quality & Operational Governance Group (SQOGG), and the Clinical Directors and Directorate Managers are providing leadership on this issue to ensure that improvements are made.”

    Source location

    2017-0181-Response-by-Tameside-Glossop-Integrated-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor discharge-summary compliance through governance, clinical and operational management arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ Divisional Director of Operations for Adult Medicine has been tasked with leading on this issue, with support from ████████, Medical Director. The responsibility to ensure that every patient has a discharge summary rests with the consultant responsible for that episode of care and this has been reiterated to all consultants. Compliance is being monitored by the Trust’s Service Quality & Operational Governance Group (SQOGG), and the Clinical Directors and Directorate Managers are providing leadership on this issue to ensure that improvements are made.”

    Source location

    2017-0181-Response-by-Tameside-Glossop-Integrated-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop bespoke software for electronic Emergency Department casualty cards and automated discharge-summary generation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that a new process is to be put in place for the discharge of patients from the Emergency Department. The Trust is planning to introduce new bespoke software to enable the production of an electronic casualty card, to replace the current handwritten casualty cards produced by the doctors and nurses in the Emergency Department. The key data from the electronic casualty card will be used to create a discharge summary which will be electronically sent to the patient’s GP practice. It is anticipated that this will ensure that a discharge summary is completed for every patient seen within the Emergency Department.”

    Source location

    2017-0181-Response-by-Tameside-Glossop-Integrated-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out the new electronic Emergency Department casualty-card process from October 2017.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that a new process is to be put in place for the discharge of patients from the Emergency Department. The Trust is planning to introduce new bespoke software to enable the production of an electronic casualty card, to replace the current handwritten casualty cards produced by the doctors and nurses in the Emergency Department. The key data from the electronic casualty card will be used to create a discharge summary which will be electronically sent to the patient’s GP practice. It is anticipated that this will ensure that a discharge summary is completed for every patient seen within the Emergency Department.”

    Source location

    2017-0181-Response-by-Tameside-Glossop-Integrated-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce dashboard monitoring of discharged Emergency Department patients awaiting discharge summaries and follow-up investigations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The new electronic casualty card system will include a dashboard clearly identifying each and every patient that has been discharged from the Emergency Department but has not yet had a discharge summary completed, allowing the management team to effectively scrutinise compliance. The new process will also allow the Trust to monitor the arrangement of follow up investigations commissioned at the point of discharge from the Emergency Department which will further improve patient safety.”

    Source location

    2017-0181-Response-by-Tameside-Glossop-Integrated-Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for ensuring every patient has a discharge summary rests with the consultant responsible for that episode of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ Divisional Director of Operations for Adult Medicine has been tasked with leading on this issue, with support from ████████, Medical Director. The responsibility to ensure that every patient has a discharge summary rests with the consultant responsible for that episode of care and this has been reiterated to all consultants. Compliance is being monitored by the Trust’s Service Quality & Operational Governance Group (SQOGG), and the Clinical Directors and Directorate Managers are providing leadership on this issue to ensure that improvements are made.”

    Source location

    2017-0181-Response-by-Tameside-Glossop-Integrated-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response
  10. Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

    AI-generated summary

    Beryl Yvonne Foster · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Beryl Yvonne Foster underwent an endoscopic ultrasound examination on 8 December 2015, became unwell after discharge, was readmitted on 11 December 2015, and died on 2 January 2016. The concern was that posting, rather than emailing, the endoscopy discharge summary meant her GP practice was unaware of the procedure when she contacted it after becoming unwell, creating a risk in similar circumstances.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to email endoscopy discharge summaries to GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Mrs Foster's discharge summary was handed to her on 8 December 2015 and was subsequently posted to her GP practice. This meant that when she became unwell the following day and contacted the practice, it was unaware of the endoscopy the previous day. I was told that endoscopy discharge summaries are posted to GP practices by QAH, rather than emailed like all other discharge summaries. I am concerned this practice raises a risk that future deaths will occur in such circumstances and I would ask the NHS Trust to consider emailing all discharge summaries to GP practices in the future. ”

    Source location

    Beryl Yvonne Foster · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026