Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East Riding and Hull

    AI-generated summary

    Susan Dale · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Susan Dale, a resident of Westfields Residential Home, fell while being assisted with her morning routine on 8 April 2026 and later deteriorated, was taken to hospital, and died on 18 April 2026. The principal concerns were inaccurate and inconsistent records about the fall, moving her despite a recorded possible head injury without prompt clinical assessment, and the absence of an effective handover to staff taking over her care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate and inconsistent record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The record keeping in the home appears to be inaccurate and inconsistent ”

    Source location

    Susan Dale · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the electronic care management system and complete staff training for its use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the Home’s ongoing commitment to continuous quality improvement, a new electronic care management system has recently been introduced to replace the previous record-keeping platform. Staff training is currently being delivered as part of the phased implementation to ensure all staff are confident and competent in using the new system.”

    Source location

    Response from Westfield Residential Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate the structured incident-reporting workflow, including witnessed entries, senior authorisation and management escalation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The platform incorporates integrated accident and incident reporting, body maps and observation charts, providing a streamlined and consistent approach to recording and reviewing incidents. This system ensures time stamped and consistent logs are made which are then reviewed by management for further action before they can be signed off. Furthermore, all seniors have been instructed to use the ‘witness’ portions of these forms to ensure two members of staff are logging one accident at the same time to ensure consistency.”

    Source location

    Response from Westfield Residential Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct monthly governance audits of accident and incident records to monitor documentation and identify service improvements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, monthly governance audits of all accident and incident records have been incorporated within the new system. These audits provide ongoing oversight of documentation, support continuous monitoring of practice and assist in identifying further opportunities for staff development and service improvement.”

    Source location

    Response from Westfield Residential Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate the Resident of the Day process to review care plans, risks, mobility, falls risk and documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Policies of the month at Westfield are now already in circulation in which an emphasized and updated Falls policy will also be given to any existing and any new staff. A system of Resident of the Day has also already commenced which demonstrates:”

    Source location

    Response from Westfield Residential Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct an unannounced inspection assessing record keeping, falls management and staff handover processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following receipt of the Regulation 28 Report, CQC have initiated a review of this incident in line with our specific incident guidance. CQC also conducted an unannounced inspection of Westfield Residential Home on 21 July 2026. The matters of concern highlighted in the Regulation 28 Report helped to inform our inspection activity and ensure there was a particular focus on record keeping, safe management of falls and handover processes.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    No regulatory action is currently required because inspection found no ongoing risk issues relating to the concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During our unannounced inspection, in respect of any ongoing risk posed to service users, CQC did not identify any issues relating to the matters of concern raised that would require any regulatory action.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inspection evidence did not demonstrate poor record keeping overall, although sampling could not exclude shortfalls in individual records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During our recent inspection of the service last month, we reviewed record keeping in overarching general terms. Evidence available and gathered did not demonstrate poor record keeping overall, however, it is important to note that CQC’s inspection methodology follows a sampling approach, and therefore this does not mean there were not some shortfalls in some records.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 September 2026

    Open published response
  2. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Derek Thomas Burt · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derek Thomas Burt died at home on 15 May 2025 after a spontaneous rupture of an arterio-venous malformation at the back of his right ankle caused severe bleeding. The report raises concerns about communication between the careline service and ambulance services, including failure to pass on key information, delays in escalating the emergency, inadequate recording of information, and the loss of opportunities to provide basic first-aid advice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record clinically relevant information in EMA notes

    Wider context from the report

    “4) Likewise I heard from the SECAMB CSN that she had carried out an audit of the EMA notes added to their system when speaking to the first careline operator. She did so from a clinical perspective and she discovered missing information that was given but not recorded at all namely: that there had already been 20 minutes of bleeding at the time of the first call (approx. 22:43); Mr Burt was not responding normally/groaning; and Mrs Burt was bedbound therefore could not assist Mr Burt. None of this information was therefore available to the CSN who carried out the clinical review. In addition I heard that the end to end review carried out by SECAMB and focused on the dispatch difficulties that existed on 14 May 2025. I appreciate that the dispatch and clinical review systems were different at that time and have now been changed but I remain concerned that the quality of note taking has not been properly checked and action taken to rectify then make improvements with any individual concerned as well as capturing learning points for others. Here vital information was missing and was needed to ensure an effective clinical review could take place and thereby ensure that the category of call response is accurate. I was told this call had been audited and was found to be 95% compliant. This also calls into question the quality of the call auditing system ”

    Source location

    Derek Thomas Burt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contribute to NHS Pathways discussions and share learning about documentation standards and audit weighting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has also reviewed the audit findings associated with this case. During that review it was identified that documentation quality forms a relatively small component of the current NHS Pathways audit framework. SECAMB has discussed this concern with NHS Pathways, recognising the Coroner's observations regarding the significance of missing or inaccurate information within call records. As the national audit framework is owned and maintained by NHS Pathways, any review of the weighting applied to documentation standards sits within their remit. SECAMB will continue to contribute to discussions and share learning where opportunities for improvement are identified.”

    Source location

    Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review local assurance processes to identify, escalate and address significant omissions in emergency call records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The learning arising from this case has also informed local discussions regarding the assessment of documentation quality within assurance and audit processes, with a view to ensuring that significant omissions within call records are identified, escalated and addressed through appropriate learning and improvement activity.”

    Source location

    Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review training, guidance and development enhancements to improve Emergency Medical Advisors’ documentation of emergency calls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst these longer-term technological developments continue to be explored, the Trust has taken immediate action by raising the learning identified through this inquest with the Training Department. A review is underway to determine what enhancements can be made to training, guidance and development processes to further support Emergency Medical Advisors in accurately documenting information obtained during emergency calls. This will be in place by the close of the financial year.”

    Source location

    Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen CPD and learning programmes for QSF-certified organisations, covering records, operator competence, training, decision-support tools, escalation, and information-sharing with emergency services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Opportunities exist to strengthen guidance and operational procedures in these areas to help reduce the risk of similar issues occurring in the future and these will be addressed through future TEC Quality CPD e-learning programme and through strengthened QSF criteria for all certified TEC Monitoring Auditees to ensure the quality of TEC call monitoring and response.”

    Source location

    Response from Telecare Services Association
    Page 8 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Note-taking and clinical triage concerns are the responsibility of the relevant ambulance service, so no further action is proposed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concerns 4 and 5 Appello Careline Limited understands that these concerns relate to the ambulance service’s internal processes, including note taking and clinical triage decision-making.”

    Source location

    Response from Appello Careline Operations Director
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The specific case concerns should be addressed by Appello and SECAMB, rather than by the national ambulance membership organisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With respect to the matters of concern in relation to the care of Derek Burt, AACE is not in a position to respond; the specific details relate to and should subsequently be addressed by both Appello and SECAMB.”

    Source location

    Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Internal ambulance processes concerning note-taking, auditing, clinical advice and escalation fall outside the respondent’s ability to influence or comment on them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “TEC Quality response to points 4 and 5:”

    Source location

    Response from Telecare Services Association
    Page 7 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Concerns about Apello Careline’s emergency-call guidance, information handling and artificial intelligence trials are outside NHS England’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concerns 2,3, and 6 relate to the Apello Careline company, and as such are not within NHS England’s remit to comment on. As your Report has also been addressed to the Apello Careline company they will be best placed to respond to these concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apello Careline is best placed to respond to concerns about its emergency-call guidance, information handling and artificial intelligence trials.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concerns 2,3, and 6 relate to the Apello Careline company, and as such are not within NHS England’s remit to comment on. As your Report has also been addressed to the Apello Careline company they will be best placed to respond to these concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  3. North London

    AI-generated summary

    Prabhabi Cangi · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Prabhabi Cangi died in Harefield Hospital on 12 August 2025 after an ST elevation myocardial infarction, following an ambulance attendance at her home where she had chest pain, breathlessness and an abnormal ECG. The principal concerns were the lack of a clear pathway for specialist interpretation of abnormal ECGs when paramedics did not convey patients to hospital, and the failure to ensure that intermittent chest pain, breathlessness and abnormal ECG findings resulted in hospital assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance for clear and readable photographs of ECGs uploaded to attendance records

    Wider context from the report

    “That there is no guidance on photograph of the ECG uploaded to the record of attendance being clear and readable. ”

    Source location

    Prabhabi Cangi · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen staff messaging on capturing clear, readable ECG images pending enhanced digital recording solutions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “LAS policy requires that all clinical images, including ECG photographs, are relevant, clear, and clinically usable. The Trust recognises the importance of ensuring that ECG images recorded within the ePCR are consistently clear and readable and will reinforce this requirement with staff.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Commence procurement of ECG monitoring equipment requiring direct ECG data upload into electronic patient care records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is also due to commence a procurement process for new ECG monitoring equipment during the 2026–2027 financial year. A key requirement of this procurement is the capability for ECG data to be uploaded directly from monitoring equipment into the ePCR, thereby removing the need for photographic capture and improving accuracy and quality of records.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing policy requires ECG images to be clear, relevant and clinically usable, providing an established control for record quality.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Quality and Clarity of ECG Records”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local ambulance services are responsible for the operational concerns and are best placed to respond to them.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having reviewed these concerns, and shared them with the ambulance team for comment, we consider that they relate to specific operational matters, which are the responsibility of the local ambulance service. We note that your report has also been addressed to London Ambulance Service, and so we have agreed that they are best placed to respond to your concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from London Ambulance Service
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  4. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Lacey Carole Anne HEATH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lacey Carole Anne HEATH died on 16 February 2025 after collapsing at home and suffering cardiac arrest en route to hospital. The death followed thrombosis and complete stenosis of her mechanical aortic valve in the context of sub-therapeutic anticoagulation. Concerns included difficulty maintaining therapeutic anticoagulation, lack of access to affordable at-home monitoring, absence of a funding application, insufficient medical review or haematology referral, and inadequate clinical records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate clinical records of the patient’s presentation, INR results and medication dose

    Wider context from the report

    “7. There was an absence of appropriate medical records recorded for Ms Heath to understand her clinical presentation other than very basic information on the INR platform on INR results and medication dose. Evidence was these records are not compliant with the requirements of healthcare regulators and led to a lack of appreciation of Ms Heath’s concerns and complexity of her case. One entry stated Ms Heath had been “unwell” with no clarification or further information on what the problem was and/or how this may have impacted on her condition. ”

    Source location

    Lacey Carole Anne HEATH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clarify the nature and clinical impact of reported illness in records

    Wider context from the report

    “7. There was an absence of appropriate medical records recorded for Ms Heath to understand her clinical presentation other than very basic information on the INR platform on INR results and medication dose. Evidence was these records are not compliant with the requirements of healthcare regulators and led to a lack of appreciation of Ms Heath’s concerns and complexity of her case. One entry stated Ms Heath had been “unwell” with no clarification or further information on what the problem was and/or how this may have impacted on her condition. ”

    Source location

    Lacey Carole Anne HEATH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review documentation standards within the anticoagulation service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are reviewing documentation standards within the anticoagulation service, and we will implement a structured clinical note template for contacts, missed appointments, patient-reported symptoms such as “unwell”, risk discussions, escalation decisions, advice given and follow-up plan by the end of October 2026. This will explore system functionality for persistent alerts or pinned critical risk information.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a structured clinical note template covering presentation, symptoms, risks, advice, escalation decisions and follow-up, with staff briefing and documentation audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are reviewing documentation standards within the anticoagulation service, and we will implement a structured clinical note template for contacts, missed appointments, patient-reported symptoms such as “unwell”, risk discussions, escalation decisions, advice given and follow-up plan by the end of October 2026. This will explore system functionality for persistent alerts or pinned critical risk information.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce the trust-wide electronic patient record to integrate clinical information and make observations and electronic notes visible across encounters and hospital sites.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are currently in the process of introducing a new single electronic patient record (“EPR”) system across our trust. This EPR will replace/integrate with current systems services in all areas and will be for all our hospital sites.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid & South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust is best placed to address the medical-records concern because it concerns specific practitioners’ practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 4: Medical Records Non-Compliance”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 August 2026

    Open published response
  5. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abbigail Louise Smith was found at Braintree Recreation Ground on 15 February 2022 and was pronounced deceased shortly after midnight on 16 February 2022 from compression of the neck by ligature. The report describes concerns about failures in mental-health care, communication, staff training, risk assessment and discharge planning, including her discharge to supported living without an adequate plan to mitigate a known risk of self-harm.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain significant clinical information and escalate deterioration to the Consultant Psychiatrist

    Wider context from the report

    “3. In October 2021 Abbi suffered a deterioration in her mental health with reported non-compliance of Clozapine medication. The Consultant Psychiatrist emergency plan was not followed: a. Short-term prescription of Diazepam to assist with an exacerbation of distressing symptoms to permit Abbi’s Clozapine to be re-titrated was incorrectly continued as a permanent prescription in the absence of a medical review and this was not compliant with the NICE Guidelines. b. urgent follow-up required for a predicted and inevitable deterioration in the event of continued non-compliance did not take place. c. Abbi’s medical records were not updated as required; there were omissions in the significant information about Abbi’s clinical condition and Abbi was not escalated back to the Consultant Psychiatrist. These matters were then not understood by the mental health professionals as Abbi continued to deteriorate and increase in Abbi Diazepam was prescribed. ”

    Source location

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to appropriately record all clinical contacts

    Wider context from the report

    “6. There were issues in communication and sharing of information. Evidence was that some EPUT staff did not appreciate Abbi’s history and did not read the medical records or query inconsistencies. Not all clinical contacts were appropriately recorded. ”

    Source location

    Abbigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Save care-related emails to patient records and deliver Trust-wide training on timely records storage.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Care Coordinator who was involved in Abbi’s care now ensures that all email documentation is saved on the patient’s records. In addition, Trust wide training has been delivered on the importance of ensuring full records are stored / saved in a timely manner into patient records.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Escalate medication non-adherence to the responsible Consultant Psychiatrist, discuss it in MDT and zoning meetings, assess risk, and document an agreed action plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Upon staff becoming aware that a patient is not taking their medication as prescribed, immediate escalation is made to the responsible Consultant Psychiatrist, the case is discussed at the multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting, risk is formally assessed and RAG-rated within the zoning meeting, and an agreed action plan is documented; a copy of the MDT minutes is uploaded to the patient’s electronic record (PARIS) and circulated to all relevant professionals.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct every-shift record-keeping audits at the Linden Centre and cascade identified corrective actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To ensure that risk assessments are up to standard, a record keeping audit is undertaken at every shift at the Linden Centre to monitor details, accuracy and that information is up to date particularly with recent incidents. This is undertaken by the allocated qualified staff member and any identified actions are cascaded at the end of every shift. Should any staff have an identified training need this will be addressed in supervision to ensure performance management.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 9 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use ward-specific electronic dashboards and daily printed information to identify and address gaps in records, risk assessments, and care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Management Teams and staff also have access to an electronic Trust dashboard which is specific to each ward and provides a full oversight of relevant ward information about their current patients (including records, risk assessments and care plans), this supported the identification of any record gaps that can then be promptly addressed. These are printed on a daily basis for staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Trust
    Page 9 · response
    Published 13 August 2026

    Open published response
  6. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Abigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abigail Louise Smith was found at Braintree Recreation Ground on 15 February 2022 after unsuccessfully trying to suspend herself, and was pronounced dead at 00:08 on 16 February 2022 from compression of the neck. The report describes concerns about failures in mental-health care, including inaccurate records and diagnosis information, inadequate adjustments for autism and learning difficulties, medication-management problems, and discharge from detention without an effective plan to mitigate a known and immediate risk of suicide.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record changes in mental health diagnosis in Psychology records

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Objectively and subjectively Abbi had appeared to respond positively to Clozapine medication with which she was compliant such that Abbi was discharged back to the care of her local community mental health Trust . The medical records and documentation contained significant cutting and pasting and the change of mental health diagnosis was not contained within the Psychology records. ”

    Source location

    Abigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Illegibility of medical records about medication

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Medication regimes and changes were not accurately recorded in the medical records, and this included medication that required statutory monitoring and was difficult to decipher even at the inquest. ”

    Source location

    Abigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Significant cutting and pasting in medical records and documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Objectively and subjectively Abbi had appeared to respond positively to Clozapine medication with which she was compliant such that Abbi was discharged back to the care of her local community mental health Trust . The medical records and documentation contained significant cutting and pasting and the change of mental health diagnosis was not contained within the Psychology records. ”

    Source location

    Abigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccuracies and omissions in medical records about diagnosis, care and treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Expert evidence was there was no individualised care plan recorded for Abbi There were inaccuracies and omissions in her medical records about Abbi’s diagnosis, care and treatment during her care and treatment that were then shared and relied upon by other healthcare professionals in other Trusts. ”

    Source location

    Abigail Louise SMITH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Edith May Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edith May Jones had limited mobility and underlying health conditions, including heart failure, and developed a deteriorating sacral pressure ulcer. She was admitted to hospital with an infected stage 4 pressure ulcer, did not improve despite intravenous antibiotics, and died on 17 October 2025; the stated cause was heart failure exacerbated by the infected ulcer. Concerns included poor District Nursing documentation, limited managerial oversight, delayed escalation, shortcomings in the gateway referral triage process, and ineffective GP triage of referrals and family information.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor quality of District Nursing team documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The quality of the District Nursing team documentation was poor. Consequently, it was difficult to understand the steps taken and the rationale for actions; ”

    Source location

    Edith May Jones · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish and operate a District Nursing Documentation Group to improve documentation standards and drive continuous improvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since then, the service has implemented a comprehensive documentation improvement programme which has been further strengthened following this inquest. This work has included:”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and refine EMIS templates to support professional decision-making, risk assessment and clinical oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Review and refinement of EMIS templates to ensure documentation supports professional decision-making, risk assessment and clinical oversight.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen documentation of clinical reasoning, escalation decisions and patient-centred care plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Increased focus on documenting clinical reasoning, escalation decisions and patient-centred care plans.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assign Team Leaders active responsibility for record review, staff development and documentation-quality assurance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Team Leaders taking an active lead role in reviewing records, supporting staff development and providing assurance regarding documentation quality.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use enhanced documentation audits, Quality Assurance Rounds, accreditation and governance processes to monitor and assure record quality.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Use of audit findings to inform training priorities, learning activities and quality improvement programme”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a District Nursing Improvement Group to lead work on triage, caseload management, documentation, escalation and monthly audited assurance reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Divisional Nurse and AHP Director for Integrated Care recently set up the District Nursing Improvement Group providing strategic leadership and governance oversight for strengthening safety, quality and operational reliability across District Nursing. The groups programme of work is centred on improving the triage process to ensure consistent prioritisation and risk-based decision making, enhancing caseload management so workload is balanced, transparent and responsive and raising documentation standards to support accurate clinical records, defensible practice and effective information sharing. A further priority is embedding clearer expectations for recognising”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 6 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  8. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Amy Clare CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amy Clare Chapman, who was experiencing a mental health crisis and assessed as at high risk of suicide, was admitted to the Haven Unit at Millview Hospital on 23 March 2025. On 27 March, she was permitted to leave the unit twice without adequate checking of her records, family contact, or documentation, and later jumped from a bridge, dying from her injuries. The principal concerns included insufficient risk assessment and planning for trips out, failures to read and record notes, inadequate family involvement, uncertainty over care and safety plans, and gaps in training, alerts, checklists, and auditing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete records of decisions taken

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Nurses not reading notes before taking significant decisions is a very serious concern, as is not then completing records of the decisions taken. ”

    Source location

    Amy Clare CHAPMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the new Record of Time Away and Return procedure and form to document leave plans, risk assessment, clinical decisions, and return concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Brighton Haven has taken the action, agreed at the Inquest, to introduce a new procedure for staff to follow when risk assessing patients prior to them taking time off the Haven. The new procedure has introduced an adaptation of the in-patient form, provided at Inquest, so that it is appropriate for use at the Haven. The new Haven 'Record of Time Away and Return' form is now completed by Haven staff as part of a focused, proactive, therapeutic conversation about the patient's time away from the Haven. As the Haven is a voluntary, community service, patients are not detained at the Haven and do not require permission to leave. Yet, the Trust wholly recognises that, in the interests of patient safety, it is essential to be vigilant about a patient's plans and whereabouts when away from the Haven, and careful, structured, collaborative consideration is needed.”

    Source location

    Response from Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 June 2026

    Open published response
  9. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Peter PETTITT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter PETTITT, aged 86, died on 11 September 2023 after developing sepsis due to bronchopneumonia and acute pyelonephritis. The report raised concerns about inadequate care records, gaps in medication and catheter support, and insufficiently assured training and management arrangements for the commissioned care provided to him.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate recording of care attendances and actions taken

    Wider context from the report

    “Record keeping relating to the Suffolk County Council commissioned care provided to Mr. PETTITT was found to be inadequate, with significant gaps in records relating to frequency of attendances and details of actions taken during any attendance. The effect of these gaps in the records meant that there was no evidence carers had attended, nor undertaken commissioned care support actions for Mr. PETTITT, including assistance with medication and catheter management for periods of time extending up to several days. ”

    Source location

    Peter PETTITT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit care records and care-plan activities, addressing identified concerns and non-compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the incident, Multi-Care undertook a full audit of all care records and care plan activities across the service. Any concerns or areas of non-compliance identified during the audit process were addressed immediately.”

    Source location

    Response from Multi-Care Community Services Suffolk
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and operate a digital care-recording system with management monitoring, automated alerts and audit capability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To strengthen record-keeping standards and improve oversight, Multi-Care transitioned from a paper-based record-keeping system to a digital care recording system (Access). This was implemented immediately following the incident and remains fully operational.”

    Source location

    Response from Multi-Care Community Services Suffolk
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 April 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement standardised documentation procedures for accurate records, fluid-balance monitoring, escalation and consistent record standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, Multi-Care has introduced standardised documentation processes to ensure:”

    Source location

    Response from Multi-Care Community Services Suffolk
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 April 2026

    Open published response
  10. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    DARREN ROBERT DICKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darren Robert Dickson was found unresponsive at home after last being seen on 5 February 2025 and died in hospital on 6 February 2025. Toxicology found benzodiazepine and alcohol, and concerns were raised about incomplete records of information and signposting provided by Recovery Steps, and possible confusion or insufficient communication between Recovery Steps and GP services about benzodiazepine use and doses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain records providing a full and verifiable account of information and assistance provided

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) At the appointment on 27 January 2025, Mr Dickson was seen by a Recovery Co-Ordinator in relation to his use of benzodiazepine. It could not be ascertained from the records what information regarding signposting to other services that could have assisted Mr Dickson with treatment, was provided to him. I was concerned that the records did not allow a full and verifiable understanding of the information and assistance provided to Mr Dickson at this appointment. ”

    Source location

    DARREN ROBERT DICKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review assessment and documentation practices regularly to support continuous improvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Waythrough has carefully considered each of the matters of concern set out in your report. We wish to express our sincere condolences to Mr Dickson's family and friends for their loss. The death of any individual known to our services is treated with the utmost seriousness, and we have given detailed consideration to the concerns you have raised.”

    Source location

    2026-0151 - Response from Recovery Steps
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Records documented signposting to emergency services, the GP, the CRISIS Team and Samaritans at the initial assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Coroner's concern is that it could not be ascertained from the records what information regarding signposting to other services was provided to Mr Dickson, and that the records did not allow a full and verifiable understanding of the information and assistance provided at the appointment.”

    Source location

    2026-0151 - Response from Recovery Steps
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Initial assessment procedures, including risk assessment, recovery planning and follow-up arrangements, were considered robust and appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have reflected carefully on this concern. The records from Mr Dickson’s initial assessment do document specific signposting. In particular, the risk assessment records that Mr Dickson was made aware he could contact emergency services, his GP, the CRISIS Team, and the Samaritans if he required support. An initial Recovery Plan was also completed, setting out Mr Dickson’s personal goals and the next steps in his treatment. A follow-up appointment was arranged and confirmed via text message. Signposting and referral is a core component of RSC’s assessment process under Waythrough’s delivery model.”

    Source location

    2026-0151 - Response from Recovery Steps
    Page 3 · response
    Published 18 March 2026

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026