Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Anne JENNINGS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Anne Jennings had multiple comorbidities and was admitted to hospital on 10 January 2019. She developed infected leg ulcers, deteriorated, began end-of-life care on 25 January, and died on 31 January 2019; the inquest recorded septicaemia, infected leg ulcers and hospital-acquired pneumonia as the medical causes of death. Concerns included the handling and follow-up of a Tissue Viability Nurse referral and inadequate wound record keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate wound assessment and record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The evidence revealed a lack of and/or inadequate record keeping. Mrs Jennings was admitted to hospital on 10 January 2019 and there is no detailed record describing the wound until 21 January 2019 and no measurement of the wound until 23 January 2019. There are no photographs of the wound. A wound assessment form was not completed. At the resumed inquest no steps had been taken to ensure full and proper record keeping. ”

    Source location

    Carol Anne JENNINGS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a weekly Documentation Task and Finish Group with executive, Matron and Ward Manager oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A weekly Documentation Task and Finish Group was set up and commenced business on 21st August 2019. The Chief Nurse is the executive lead and has oversight of this meeting and it is attended by the Matrons and Ward Managers.”

    Source location

    2019-0279-Response-by-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospiatl-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain weekly documentation and risk-assessment audits across Division 2.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The weekly documentation and risk assessment audits are to be maintained and for Division 2 overall the most recent recorded compliance rate is 90.5%.”

    Source location

    2019-0279-Response-by-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospiatl-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue the Stop the Clock and SBAR safety campaign in Acute Medicine to improve risk awareness and information transfer.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Stop the Clock and SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) campaign continues within Acute Medicine. “Stop the Clock” is an initiative started by our Assessment Zone nursing staff which advocates stopping the time to gain situational awareness of risk pertaining to a task. It allows staff to check and challenge potentially unsafe practice when transferring and receiving patients before it happens. This is enhanced by using the SBAR tool as a prompt to ensure that appropriate information is relayed. I understand that Mrs Jennings had moved twice within the Acute Medicine Department and that loss of continuity may have been a factor in the problems with the associated record keeping.”

    Source location

    2019-0279-Response-by-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospiatl-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include record keeping alongside NEWS2 in core and clinical induction training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Training for core and clinical induction now covers record keeping alongside the NEWS2 early warning system.”

    Source location

    2019-0279-Response-by-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospiatl-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out standardised blue folders containing active nursing and medical records across acute medical wards, with wound documentation and bespoke staff training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Our acute medical wards have started a roll-out of new standardised blue folders which contain the most active parts of the nursing medical records. This encompasses our most acute clinical areas, including the Acute Medical Unit and the Assessment Zone. Wound assessment documentation also falls within the scope of this change. In addition, bespoke training on the ward is given to new staff who may be unfamiliar with the blue folder documentation. The intention is that standardisation means that regardless of the patient’s movement through the Acute Medicine Department, the documentation will be continuous and consistent.”

    Source location

    2019-0279-Response-by-Queen-Elizabeth-Hospiatl-Kings-Lynn-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Deborah Chapman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Deborah Chapman, who had COPD, chronic pain, and continued to misuse heroin and crack cocaine, was found unresponsive at home on 3 March 2019 and was pronounced dead at 7.06am. The post-mortem attributed her death to the combined toxic effects of heroin, oxycodone and pregabalin, together with COPD. Concerns included whether her ongoing illicit drug use and the risks of combining prescribed and illicit drugs had been adequately assessed and recorded when prescribing oxycodone and pregabalin.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record enquiries about illicit drug misuse and patients’ responses

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The evidence I heard from the records held at the medical centre did not reveal the extent to which any enquiry was made of Ms Chapman as to her current misuse of illicit drugs either on the occasion of her re-joining the medical practice as a patient in July 2018 or at subsequent consultations. There were clear signs of a dependence on the prescribed opiate drugs and the medical records equally revealed long-term illicit opiate misuse. 3. The evidence I heard from the medical records held at the medical centre did not reveal, beyond the admitted dependence on the prescribed medication, what enquiry had been made from Ms Chapman in relation to her continued misuse of illicit drugs or her response to those enquiries. 4. In the absence of that information, it was not possible, from the medical records, to ascertain what level of risk the continued illicit misuse of opiates posed to Ms Chapman and therefore, whether, on an informed basis, pregabalin and oxycodone were appropriate prescriptions. ”

    Source location

    Deborah Chapman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss illicit-drug-use recording requirements and clarify that stopped intravenous drug use does not establish cessation of all illicit drug use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the first instance, Mrs Chapman’s death was discussed in a Primary Care Team Meeting. In particular, the need to ensure we have an up to date record of all illicit drug use was emphasised and a reminder of the fact that a record of intravenous drug abuse having been stopped does not mean that all illicit drug use has been stopped.”

    Source location

    2019-0280-Response-from-West-Timperley-Medical-Centre-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Search the clinical system regularly for patients receiving regular opiate analgesia or Pregabalin who have a history of drug misuse.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have put in place a regular search of our clinical system to identify patients that are taking regular opiate analgesia and who have a past history of drug misuse. A similar search has been undertaken for those patients taking regular Pregabalin. The searches have identified 16 patients taking regular opiate analgesia with a history of drug misuse and 7 patients taking Pregabalin with a history of past drug misuse. We are currently contacting those patients to ensure that we have an up to date record of their current illicit drug use.”

    Source location

    2019-0280-Response-from-West-Timperley-Medical-Centre-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Contact identified patients to update records of their current illicit drug use.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have put in place a regular search of our clinical system to identify patients that are taking regular opiate analgesia and who have a past history of drug misuse. A similar search has been undertaken for those patients taking regular Pregabalin. The searches have identified 16 patients taking regular opiate analgesia with a history of drug misuse and 7 patients taking Pregabalin with a history of past drug misuse. We are currently contacting those patients to ensure that we have an up to date record of their current illicit drug use.”

    Source location

    2019-0280-Response-from-West-Timperley-Medical-Centre-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Xander Curran-Pass · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Xander Curran-Pass was delivered by category C Caesarean Section on 15 September 2018 after reduced fetal movement, delayed induction of labour, and concerning CTG findings. Resuscitation was unsuccessful and he died; post-mortem examination identified poor placental function associated with chronic villitis and thrombotic vasculopathy. The substantive concerns included delays in review and delivery, inadequate monitoring and documentation, and unclear or inconsistent processes for managing induction of labour and reduced fetal movement.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor quality of admission documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The quality of documentation on admission was poor; ”

    Source location

    Xander Curran-Pass · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    David Jonathon Jukes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Jonathon Jukes was declared deceased on 9 October 2018 after being found hanging from a ligature fixed to a garden gate. The report identified concerns about inadequate information sharing, mental-health assessment and follow-up, attempts to locate and engage him, risk assessment, and clinical record keeping, with associated risks to life.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain accurate records of contacts, decisions and risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Throughout the inquest evidence was given of alleged attempted contact and decision making with respect to Mr. Jukes that was not recorded in his BSMHT RIO notes. Furthermore, his Risk Screen was not updated after information came to HTT’s attention that affected his risk assessment. There was some evidence that HTT do not have capacity to fulfil their obligation to keep records but evidence from some witnesses suggested that they did not view record keeping as a necessity. If, for whatever reason, RIO notes are not an accurate reflection of contacts, actions and decision-making clinicians may be mis-led or ill-informed creating a risk to life. Evidence was given that there is an e-learning module on the topic of record keeping and a ‘Key message’ 3 minute video but it is not compulsory for staff to watch the video or feedback on it and staff are not tested or individually audited. Consequently there continues to be a risk that individuals will not comply with their duty to keep proper records and noncompliance will go undetected. ”

    Source location

    David Jonathon Jukes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase administrative support for Home Treatment Team multidisciplinary meetings so discussions and outcomes are recorded consistently.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you state, it is vitally important that clinical records are documented to evidence the care and treatment plans for patients that are discussed between clinicians. We have identified that when our Multi-Disciplinary Team meetings take place there is evidence of some inconsistency in the recording of discussions and outcomes in some areas. In direct response to this finding we have increased administrative resources within our Home Treatment Teams to enable consistent administrative support to our Multi-Disciplinary Team meetings which in turn will ensure that outcomes are clearly recorded. In addition, we have commenced a Quality Improvement Project to develop clear standards for Multi-Disciplinary Team meetings and recording requirements. We apologise sincerely for this failing in our clinical record keeping for Mr Jukes.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop clear multidisciplinary-team standards and recording requirements through a quality-improvement project.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you state, it is vitally important that clinical records are documented to evidence the care and treatment plans for patients that are discussed between clinicians. We have identified that when our Multi-Disciplinary Team meetings take place there is evidence of some inconsistency in the recording of discussions and outcomes in some areas. In direct response to this finding we have increased administrative resources within our Home Treatment Teams to enable consistent administrative support to our Multi-Disciplinary Team meetings which in turn will ensure that outcomes are clearly recorded. In addition, we have commenced a Quality Improvement Project to develop clear standards for Multi-Disciplinary Team meetings and recording requirements. We apologise sincerely for this failing in our clinical record keeping for Mr Jukes.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and pilot mandatory clinical risk assessment and management training covering cumulative risk factors, suicide prevention and risk documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In direct response to this matter of concern we are now reviewing our Home Treatment Team Operating Protocol to strengthen the requirement for nurse led triage and assessment screening and appropriate clinical escalation to a Consultant Psychiatrist. Consultant Psychiatrist overview and scrutiny of each case would either be through direct clinical assessment or review or through input and direction within the multi-disciplinary team or through formal or informal supervision of doctors and other home treatment staff. We note the view of the team that they felt they acted appropriately and are therefore also using this very sad incident as a Case Study in our new Clinical Risk Assessment and Management Training so that staff are fully alert to accumulative risk factors. This training is mandatory for all clinical staff in the Trust irrelevant of clinical profession or team.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve care-planning and clinical-risk-assessment processes through a quality-improvement project.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to this, we have launched two critical Quality Improvement Projects – one is to develop and implement core MDT minimum standards for recording of clinical documentation; the second is to improve our care planning and clinical risk assessment processes.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Birmingham-and-Solihull-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Care and treatment concerns are largely for provider organisations to resolve.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2.8 These issues are largely within the remit of the provider organisations to resolve, and the CCG confirms that an appropriate action plan has been drawn up and completed by BSMHFT.”

    Source location

    2019-0329-Response-by-Birmingham-and-Solihull-CCG
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local NHS agencies are expected to address the report’s local concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Please note this response will address the matters of concern from a national level and we would expect the local NHS agencies, which I note are copied in to the letter, to address the local concerns raised.”

    Source location

    2019-0220-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 26 July 2019

    Open published response
  5. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Charles Knapp · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Charles Knapp, who was paraplegic and dependent on care, developed necrotic pressure sores while living at home and later died in hospital on 24 February 2018 from aspiration pneumonia. The concerns included failures by Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd to maintain his hygiene, reposition him, seek medical attention, provide two carers as required, and maintain or supply complete care records; the Coroner was concerned that inadequate care and records could put other service users at risk of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to keep adequate patient records

    Wider context from the report

    “The Coroner understands that although Angel Solutions (UK) has now been rated as inadequate following an inspection carried out by the Care Quality Commission in March 2019, it continues to provide care to approximately 8 individuals. The Coroner is concerned that there is a risk that the company will provide inadequate care to those individuals and keep inadequate patient records in respect of them, which gives rise to the risk of future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Mr Charles Knapp · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain and provide complete patient records

    Wider context from the report

    “(iii) Angel Solutions (UK) Ltd failed to provide the court with a full set of Mr Knapp’s records, and as such the court did not have the opportunity to review the records for the key period prior to the development of the pressure sores. ”

    Source location

    Mr Charles Knapp · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    James William Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James William Francis, who had a history of falls and balance difficulties, suffered an unwitnessed fall at his care home on 9 April 2017 and later developed repeated vomiting and deterioration. He was admitted to hospital with a large subdural haematoma and died on 11 April 2017. The principal concerns included failures in shift handover and monitoring, delays in seeking medical advice, inadequate information provided to paramedics, the patient’s positioning, staff training, and whether relevant guidelines sufficiently addressed this type of injury in elderly patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document key patient-care events and sickness details

    Wider context from the report

    “Again, it took some time to obtain all the details of the fall and sickness details Finally, when leaving the building to get the stretcher trolley one of the paramedic crew heard care home staff arguing about the sickness details that had not been documented. This evidence raises considerable concern regarding the adequacy of documenting key events in a patient’s care such as a fall event if the patient indicates there was no acute trauma particularly when the patient is elderly and has a complicated past medical history ”

    Source location

    James William Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit two Quality Improvement Managers for West Sussex homes to support service improvements, care-record completion, mentoring and supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care planning, daily records from assessments and evaluations continue to be improved at Deerswood. For our 12 care homes in West Sussex we have recruited two Quality Improvement Managers where their primary function is to ensure improvements in service provision including the completion of care records - along with mentoring, supervising and role-modelling to care and nursing staff.”

    Source location

    2019-0202-Response-by-Shaw-Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue improving care planning and daily assessment and evaluation records at Deerswood.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Care planning, daily records from assessments and evaluations continue to be improved at Deerswood. For our 12 care homes in West Sussex we have recruited two Quality Improvement Managers where their primary function is to ensure improvements in service provision including the completion of care records - along with mentoring, supervising and role-modelling to care and nursing staff.”

    Source location

    2019-0202-Response-by-Shaw-Healthcare
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 August 2019

    Open published response
  7. Newcastle upon Tyne

    AI-generated summary

    Maia Hazel Ann Strachan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Maia Hazel Ann Strachan was born on 6 July 2017 and died in hospital on 7 July 2017 after a complicated delivery involving shoulder dystocia, hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and severe macrosomia. The report identified concerns about inaccurate and suboptimal ultrasound assessment, inaccessible obstetric and diabetic records, missed opportunities for Caesarean delivery and joint decision-making, fetal scalp electrode use, documentation, and dissemination of expert findings.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Suboptimal clinical documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Suboptimal Documentation: The Trust should implement a robust training and audit plan to address the risks of this occurring in the future. ”

    Source location

    Maia Hazel Ann Strachan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and provide PROMPT documentation training for midwives and obstetricians, informed by documentation audit findings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Current training around the required standard for documentation has been reviewed and is provided, as part of the PROMPT annual training for all team members including midwives and obstetricians. The content of the training is informed by the findings of a recently completed documentation audit.”

    Source location

    Maia-Strachan-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct ongoing monthly documentation audits, produce quarterly Board reports, and share themes to inform multidisciplinary learning and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This audit has until recently been completed annually however this has been superseded by a recent agreement within the Surgical Business Unit for an ongoing monthly audit of a specific number of notes in each speciality. There will be a”

    Source location

    Maia-Strachan-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a documentation audit whose findings inform documentation training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Current training around the required standard for documentation has been reviewed and is provided, as part of the PROMPT annual training for all team members including midwives and obstetricians. The content of the training is informed by the findings of a recently completed documentation audit.”

    Source location

    Maia-Strachan-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 August 2019

    Open published response
  8. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Jenson James Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jenson James Francis was delivered by caesarean section and developed chorioamnionitis and funisitis in the context of maternal sepsis. The report records cardio-pulmonary failure following a failure to deliver him in good time and states that he was exposed to the effects of developing maternal sepsis. Principal concerns included poor CTG interpretation and training, unclear clinical leadership and communication, inadequate records, insufficient staffing and escalation, and wider systemic shortcomings in the maternity unit.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete NEWS charts and partograms and maintain adequate records

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) NEWS charts and partograms were not completed, and there was a poor standard of record keeping. ”

    Source location

    Jenson James Francis · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver mandatory training on communication, record keeping, documentation and escalation, with compliance monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is an Organisational Development Action Plan to focus on many areas of the multiprofessional teams in maternity services. Within the plan there is support for multidisciplinary team working and clinical leadership. Included in the plan are two study days in July and October 2019 supported by the Royal College of Midwives to improve clinical leadership and team working within the department. The mandatory professional training days include sessions on communication, record keeping and documentation and escalation. This plan focuses on individual team members as well as groups. PROMPT is now fully implemented into the Health Board with all staff booked for training before the end of March 2020. Training compliance is monitored through the HB Maternity Improvement Board.”

    Source location

    2019-0158-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit maternity record keeping, NEWS charts and risk-assessment completion, share findings and address identified deficiencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The maternity services have commenced a record keeping audit as part of the audit plan. The findings of the audit will be shared with all staff and actions taken where improvements need to be taken. The senior midwives are undertaking assurance audits on the maternity wards monitoring the standards of records and completion of NEWS charts and other risk assessments. Any areas identified at the time of the monthly assurance audits are being managed at the time of finding an error or incomplete record. Clinical Supervisors for Midwives are conducting monthly group supervision sessions with a focus on the standard of record keeping.”

    Source location

    2019-0158-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide monthly clinical supervision for midwives focused on record-keeping standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The maternity services have commenced a record keeping audit as part of the audit plan. The findings of the audit will be shared with all staff and actions taken where improvements need to be taken. The senior midwives are undertaking assurance audits on the maternity wards monitoring the standards of records and completion of NEWS charts and other risk assessments. Any areas identified at the time of the monthly assurance audits are being managed at the time of finding an error or incomplete record. Clinical Supervisors for Midwives are conducting monthly group supervision sessions with a focus on the standard of record keeping.”

    Source location

    2019-0158-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response
  9. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    James David FLETCHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James David Fletcher died in hospital on 14 July 2018 following peritonitis caused by leakage of gastric contents after PEG tube insertion. The report identifies concerns including failure to consider or detect peritonitis, continued use of the PEG tube despite it being contraindicated, inadequate communication and record keeping, insufficient awareness of post-operative PEG risks, and difficulties ensuring essential medication was available.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make timely clinical records communicating patients’ condition and care

    Wider context from the report

    “2) There is a risk of future deaths because both patient care and the opportunity to learn valuable lessons following a death may be compromised by issues pertaining to the quality of record keeping and to the retention of records. Whilst it is understood that “NEWS 2” is being introduced and supersedes the early warning score system being used at the time of the Deceased’s death and whilst the early warning score system in use at the time does not, therefore, form the subject matter of this report: a) I am concerned that the evidence revealed that substantial periods of time elapsed, at times measuring 9 or more hours, when no entry was made in the Deceased’s History Sheet, notwithstanding the deteriorating nature of the Deceased’s condition. This approach to record keeping carries the risk of material information concerning the condition and care of patients not being communicated between medical, nursing and other clinicians; b) Complete records were not provided to the Court in accordance with directions given prior to the inquest. It was understood from the Trust that complete records were unavailable and yet it transpired on the first day of the inquest that further records were available but had not been found and produced previously. I am concerned that the system of record keeping gives rise to a risk that patients’ records which are material to their ongoing care will be lost or otherwise inaccessible. c) I am concerned that, without records of appropriate quality being made and retained, the opportunity to learn lessons through the process of internal investigations and, should it arise, the Coroner investigation and inquest process will be compromised. ”

    Source location

    James David FLETCHER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Richard HINTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Richard HINTON attended A&E with right calf pain and swelling after being advised to attend because of a possible clot. He was discharged before a markedly raised D-Dimer result became available; the inquest recorded pulmonary embolus due to deep vein thrombosis and bleeding duodenal ulcer, with a conclusion of “Preventable Natural Cause”. Concerns included failures in recording and communicating the D-Dimer request and result, delayed testing, inadequate documentation, and other system and process failures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record and communicate relevant presenting symptoms and prior clinical advice

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The information chain. a) When Mark (as the family wish him to be referred to) attended A&E he informed the triage nurse (nurse A) that he had contacted 111 who advised to go to A&E due to possible ‘clot’. That information was not recorded or passed on to others. Recorded examination of Mark included pain and obvious swelling to right calf. b) The Staff Nurse (nurse B) who then carried out observations on Mark came to the view that he ‘could probably do with a D-Dimer’. That nurse states she passed that information to the next (third) nurse (nurse C). c) Nurse C states that information was not passed to her. She was unaware that Mark had pain in his calf and therefore had no reason to request bloods, particularly a D-Dimer test, and had no knowledge of them being requested. d) At or around 19:33 hours it appears that bloods, including a D-Dimer test were requested. However there is no record of these (8) test being recorded or who ordered them or why. e) When the attending doctor first saw Mark at 21:06 hours he saw the results of 7 blood tests none of which indicated to him the presence of a possible DVT. The 8th blood test (i.e. the D-Dimer test) was not shown and as there was no record of it having been requested he did not know it was outstanding and nor in his opinion, was it required. Upon the information before that doctor he medically discharged Mark from hospital. Following Marks’ discharge from hospital the result of the D-Dimer test became available which would have led to Mark being admitted with treatment which probably would have saved his life. ”

    Source location

    Mark Richard HINTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record a differential diagnosis of DVT

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Other matters arising. a) A second set of observations should have been made before Mark was discharged. This did not happen. b) The D-Dimer test result was delayed due to a systems error with the CS2500 machine. It is stated that this may have happened intermittently and is then corrected. Had the system error not occurred it is likely that the (8th) result would have been available on screen for the discharging doctor to review. c) Telephone results are not made if the patient is an in-patient in A&E. The Standing Operation Procedure (SOP) in Pathology states “D-Dimer greater than 500ug/l telephone to GP, out-patients and outlying hospitals (excludes SATH in-patients)”. Is a patient waiting assessment in A&E an out-patient or in-patient or some other category? d) Differential diagnosis. Had all the information to the discharging doctor a differential diagnosis of DVT may have been made and recorded. e) A body map had not been completed at any time. f) Oramorph was recorded as having been given but not checked. Also it may the mask symptoms of pain. g) Whilst D-Dimer tests were becoming routine rather than clinically required, Mark had come in with a possible ‘clot’ whether his earlier symptoms had improved or not. h) The absence of documentation made it difficult if not impossible to resolve factual discrepancies between members of staff. i) The impression given by witnesses was that they were under pressure (racing against the clock) to meet the 4 hour deadline in A&E. ”

    Source location

    Mark Richard HINTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient clinical documentation to resolve staff discrepancies

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Other matters arising. a) A second set of observations should have been made before Mark was discharged. This did not happen. b) The D-Dimer test result was delayed due to a systems error with the CS2500 machine. It is stated that this may have happened intermittently and is then corrected. Had the system error not occurred it is likely that the (8th) result would have been available on screen for the discharging doctor to review. c) Telephone results are not made if the patient is an in-patient in A&E. The Standing Operation Procedure (SOP) in Pathology states “D-Dimer greater than 500ug/l telephone to GP, out-patients and outlying hospitals (excludes SATH in-patients)”. Is a patient waiting assessment in A&E an out-patient or in-patient or some other category? d) Differential diagnosis. Had all the information to the discharging doctor a differential diagnosis of DVT may have been made and recorded. e) A body map had not been completed at any time. f) Oramorph was recorded as having been given but not checked. Also it may the mask symptoms of pain. g) Whilst D-Dimer tests were becoming routine rather than clinically required, Mark had come in with a possible ‘clot’ whether his earlier symptoms had improved or not. h) The absence of documentation made it difficult if not impossible to resolve factual discrepancies between members of staff. i) The impression given by witnesses was that they were under pressure (racing against the clock) to meet the 4 hour deadline in A&E. ”

    Source location

    Mark Richard HINTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete a body map

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Other matters arising. a) A second set of observations should have been made before Mark was discharged. This did not happen. b) The D-Dimer test result was delayed due to a systems error with the CS2500 machine. It is stated that this may have happened intermittently and is then corrected. Had the system error not occurred it is likely that the (8th) result would have been available on screen for the discharging doctor to review. c) Telephone results are not made if the patient is an in-patient in A&E. The Standing Operation Procedure (SOP) in Pathology states “D-Dimer greater than 500ug/l telephone to GP, out-patients and outlying hospitals (excludes SATH in-patients)”. Is a patient waiting assessment in A&E an out-patient or in-patient or some other category? d) Differential diagnosis. Had all the information to the discharging doctor a differential diagnosis of DVT may have been made and recorded. e) A body map had not been completed at any time. f) Oramorph was recorded as having been given but not checked. Also it may the mask symptoms of pain. g) Whilst D-Dimer tests were becoming routine rather than clinically required, Mark had come in with a possible ‘clot’ whether his earlier symptoms had improved or not. h) The absence of documentation made it difficult if not impossible to resolve factual discrepancies between members of staff. i) The impression given by witnesses was that they were under pressure (racing against the clock) to meet the 4 hour deadline in A&E. ”

    Source location

    Mark Richard HINTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit ED staff compliance with documentation requirements and repeat the audit monthly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Agreed. The Trust relies on the integrity of individuals to maintain professional standards of completing documentation. There are clear guidelines issued by both the NMC and the GMC which should be adhered to. An action from the RCA was to audit whether the ED staff were compliant in completing documentation. The initial audit results showed poor compliance and the plan is for the audit to be repeated monthly. The results have been discussed by the senior ED management team who are tasked with bringing improvement.”

    Source location

    2019-0142-Response-by-The-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust was unaware of the suspected clot, and a painful leg alone was not necessarily indicative of a clot.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “g. Whilst D-Dimer tests were becoming routine rather than clinically required, Mark had come in with a possible ‘clot’ whether his earlier symptoms had improved or not.”

    Source location

    2019-0142-Response-by-The-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Body maps apply to significant skin conditions and majors patients, not patients classified as minors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “e. A body map had not been completed at any time.”

    Source location

    2019-0142-Response-by-The-Shrewsbury-and-Telford-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 June 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026