Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cardiff and the Vale of Glamorgan

    AI-generated summary

    Geoffrey Parry · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Geoffrey Parry underwent major surgery for aggressive bladder cancer on 1 May 2015, developed infection and pneumonia, and died on 29 June 2015. Concerns included an ECG result being unavailable to anaesthetists before surgery and an unlabelled intravenous noradrenaline line becoming disconnected in intensive care, causing a significant drop in blood pressure and the need for cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to keep investigative test and scan results with patients' medical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “During the evidence it transpired that an ECG test which was undertaken on 21st April 2015 was not available to the reviewing consultant anaesthetists prior to surgery. The evidence suggested that there was a problem within the hospital, not specific to ECG tests whereby results from investigative tests and scans are not kept with the patient's medical notes. In this instance, it appeared that there was a facility for the result of the ECG to be electronically uploaded onto the hospital computer system but this had not happened. The evidence at the hearing suggested that this was not an uncommon problem. In this case the unavailability of the scan was not in any way causative of Mr Parry's death but could have been. ”

    Source location

    Geoffrey Parry · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review systems and processes for storing ECG investigations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• An ECG test undertaken on 21 April 2015 was not available to the reviewing consultant anaesthetist prior to surgery. The evidence suggested that there was a problem within the hospital, not specific to ECG tests whereby results from investigative tests and scans are not kept with the patient’s medical notes. In this instance, it appeared that there was a facility for the result of the ECG to be electronically uploaded onto the hospital computer system but this had not happened.”

    Source location

    2015-0400-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 October 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review ECG machines for MUSE connectivity and improved patient identification.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to strengthen use of the MUSE system across the Health Board a number of actions are planned. An improvement plan to support this is in development and will address numerous areas including:”

    Source location

    2015-0400-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 October 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review MUSE usage and supporting infrastructure capacity for increased ECG activity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to strengthen use of the MUSE system across the Health Board a number of actions are planned. An improvement plan to support this is in development and will address numerous areas including:”

    Source location

    2015-0400-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 October 2015

    Open published response
  2. Blackburn, Hyndburn and Ribble Valley

    AI-generated summary

    Jean Helen Hannon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jean Helen Hannon underwent a laminectomy in 2011 for altered sensations in her hands and subsequently became quadriplegic and developed autonomic dysreflexia. The principal concern was that Royal Blackburn Hospital medical records did not sufficiently highlight this potentially life-threatening condition, and the consultant physician was unaware of the previous diagnosis when she was admitted in December 2014.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of medical records to sufficiently highlight a previous diagnosis of a potentially life-threatening condition

    Wider context from the report

    “That the medical records retained at the Royal Blackburn Hospital failed to sufficiently highlight the previous diagnosis of a condition that is potentially life threatening. ”

    Source location

    Jean Helen Hannon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide GP case summaries through EMIS Web in urgent, emergency and planned admission records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The Trust now has access to a case summary from the patients GP notes via an electronic system called ‘EMIS web’. This means that a printed summary of the case record is included as part of the patients case notes for every urgent and emergency admission. For planned admissions this information is gathered during the pre-admission processes. These arrangements have now been in place since April 2015.”

    Source location

    2015-0458-Response-by-East-Lancashire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Pilot daily problem lists to document ongoing clinical concerns during ward rounds and assessments, with evaluation before rollout to other areas.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. ████████ a consultant geriatrician, is piloting the use of daily problem lists as a technique for documenting on-going concerns during ward rounds and daily assessments. This has been used in other hospitals specifically to address the issue of relevant clinical information not being passed on. This is currently in the pilot phase and will be rolled out to other areas after evaluation.”

    Source location

    2015-0458-Response-by-East-Lancashire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The records do not substantiate autonomic dysreflexia; autonomic instability is considered the more accurate diagnosis.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is the belief of ████████ that Jean Hannon did not have autonomic dysreflexia, and that there is no substantiating evidence in the case-note to say that she did.”

    Source location

    2015-0458-Response-by-East-Lancashire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 30 September 2015

    Open published response
  3. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Harry Pryal · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Harry Pryal died on 8 January 2015 after an accidental fall, with the inquest recording bronchopneumonia and traumatic spinal cord injury as the medical cause of death. An X-ray identifying a suspected cervical spine fracture was not reported promptly, and the report raised concerns about communication and record-keeping, conflicting interpretations of a radiology service agreement, access to imaging, and the provision of physical healthcare services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record advice on medical treatment and care

    Wider context from the report

    “i. 5BP contact WWL for advise in relation to medical treatment for patients at the Lakeside Unit on a regular basis as a matter of protocol. The Doctors in psychiatry at the Lakeside Unit, are dependent upon such advice for the treatment and care of patients. The evidence identified that there is no note of the advice in the records maintained by WWL, neither to identify the Doctor giving advice nor the content of the advice. Furthermore evidence was given that this was a situation arising on a nationwide scale. The absence of any notes prevents a record of the advice for the purpose of continuity of treatment and any subsequent referrals, particularly in a case when the Doctor giving the advice is no longer available and further advice is requested by the referring Doctor for medical treatment. ”

    Source location

    Harry Pryal · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of Lakeside Unit clinical notes to identify actions, times and clinicians

    Wider context from the report

    “v. The evidence at the Inquest revealed that the notes completed by clinicians at the Lakeside Unit, failed to identify the times of actions by them and in one note failed to identify the identity of the clinician making the note. The notes were inadequate, particularly the notes which accompanied Mr Pryal on his transfer from the Lakeside Unit, to RAEI. The details to be included in a request for x-ray examination and the fact that an urgent x-ray examination required either a telephone call to the Radiologist or a note of priority on the x-ray form did not appear to be understood by clinicians at the Lakeside Unit, and demonstrated a lack of liaison and understanding between the two Trusts, which would be necessary to allow the terms of the Service Agreement to be operated and performed. ”

    Source location

    Harry Pryal · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Direct clinicians to fully record specialist clinical advice, including colleagues’ names, grades and contact details.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A directive has been given to all clinicians within the Trust relating to the recording of clinical advice by specialist services. In Mr Pryal's case, this was with the medical registrar for medicine. There is a requirement that all clinical advice we receive is fully recorded, with emphasis on the recording of the name, grade and contact details of clinical colleagues we speak to. This has been sent out for immediate action via an internal email.”

    Source location

    2015-0391-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the clinical-record audit process and consider policy changes based on audit recommendations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust's records manager is reviewing the process for clinical record audit in line with recent organisational changes that have occurred. This is being completed by the Records Management team and reported to the Chief Nurse and Executive”

    Source location

    2015-0391-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a standardised transfer proforma recording medical background, referral reasons and prior discussions for transfer between the Trusts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Trust has been working with 5BP to create a standardised proforma for use on transfers between the two organisations (please see Appendix 1). The proforma, setting out the patient’s medical background, reason for referral, and any prior discussions, would be sent upon transfer and kept within the medical records. Both Trusts are looking to pilot these proformas following approval from the respective clinical committees.”

    Source location

    2015-0391-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a standardised transfer proforma for inclusion in care records between the two trusts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have developed a standardised proforma for use on transfer between the Trust and Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust to be kept within the care record. These proforma have been created by the clinicians who will be using them and have been discussed at the Wigan Medical Staff Committee (minutes available).”

    Source location

    2015-0391-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Documenting external referral discussions contemporaneously is difficult because calls occur during clinical duties and patients often lack accessible Trust records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that the Trust’s Medical Registrar on-call receives approximately 60 to 70 bleeps a day during his 12 hour shift. The majority of those relate to internal queries; however around 5-10% are telephone referrals from external providers, (such as 5BP, GPs, and other NHS hospitals). Often these calls are taken whilst the health professional is on a ward undertaking clinical duties, therefore making it difficult for a note to be made of that discussion, especially as these calls do not relate to patients currently being treated within the Trust.”

    Source location

    2015-0391-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The health professional seeking advice is responsible for ensuring a full and accurate record of the clinical advice received.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “According to the General Medical Council, and Royal College guidance, there is a duty on the health professional seeking the advice to ensure a full and accurate record is kept. I note a directive has been given to clinicians within 5BP to ensure all clinical advice received is fully recorded, and for the documentation to include the health professional’s name, grade and contact details.”

    Source location

    2015-0391-Response-by-Wrightington-Wigan-and-Leigh-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local providers are responsible for reviewing local systems concerning X-ray reporting, electronic viewing and patient-note recording.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You outline the circumstances which led to this situation and direct several concerns to the 5 Boroughs Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (5BP) and Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust (WWL) which relate to their joint Service Agreement, the reporting times for X-rays, the electronic systems available to support web viewing of X-rays and the recording of appropriate patient notes. These concerns are about the local systems that are in place and rightly addressed to the local providers, who I am confident will consider and review.”

    Source location

    2015-0391-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 September 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local-level services are responsible for implementing the recording of clinical information in patient notes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Whilst the actual recording of patient notes is something that is agreed and implemented at local level, the general move away from paper to integrated digital care records should improve the comprehensiveness of information held, including essential diagnostic tests and it’s availability to all professionals engaged in the care of individual patients.”

    Source location

    2015-0391-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 September 2015

    Open published response
  4. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Janine Eugenie Pierrette KAISER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janine Eugenie Pierrette KAISER died at a nursing home on 21 October 2014 from lobar pneumonia, with suppurative cystitis, a sacral pressure ulcer, aortic stenosis, multiple myeloma and stroke also recorded. The principal concerns included missed turns, inaccurate or falsified records, inadequate pressure-mattress checks, poor recording of food and fluid intake, inadequate staff training and continuity, delayed referral to tissue viability nurses, and insufficient response to weight loss and safeguarding concerns. The inquest concluded that she died from significant natural disease, with a contributing sacral ulcer whose progress had been compromised by gaps in nursing care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record declined interventions

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability Nurses. ”

    Source location

    Janine Eugenie Pierrette KAISER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share investigation learning with New Park House and recommend improvements to recording practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Some turns had been missed but Mrs Kaiser was known to regularly refuse to comply with the turn regime in place. It was acknowledged that such refusals were not always documented and the home took this away as a recommendation from the investigation for further work with the staff.”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The investigation found no evidence that the pressure-sore management plan was inadequately followed or that records had been falsified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. The deceased had in place a management plan for dealing with her pressure sores. The plan was not adequately followed; turns were missed leaving long periods when the deceased remained unturned. Records were not appropriately kept when the deceased declined intervention. Records had been falsified and turns recorded when they had not been done. It was not possible to identify which member of staff had completed the forms. Nursing staff were not available to take calls from the Tissue Viability Nurses.”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response
  5. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Elsie Clarke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elsie Clarke was a resident at Hurst Hall care centre and developed significant pneumonia on 10 February 2015, dying later that day. The report identified concerns about missed opportunities to summon medical help, inadequate staff training and observations, failures in record-keeping and handover, and deficiencies in out-of-hours medical processes and death reporting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to keep proper and sufficient resident care notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(7) There was a failure to keep proper and sufficient notes of the care afforded to each resident. ”

    Source location

    Elsie Clarke · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Supervise staff on recording residents’ welfare and monitor records through daily senior-team checks and weekly Home Manager reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action taken The Care Home has undertaken supervision with all of the staff explaining the importance of clearly recording detailed information about the welfare of the Residents. These records are monitored weekly by the Home Manager and checked daily by the senior team to ensure compliance from staff in their effective completion.”

    Source location

    Elsie-ClarkeR
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 August 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train staff on care-plan documentation and review care plans after admissions, changes in needs, and at least monthly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action taken Care plan training has been undertaken with all staff ensuring they clearly document the care each Resident has received. This is checked following the admission of any new Resident to the Care Home and where changes”

    Source location

    Elsie-ClarkeR
    Page 2 · response
    Published 20 August 2015

    Open published response
  6. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Simon Peter REYNOLDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Simon Peter REYNOLDS was admitted to Mason Unit at Southmead Hospital on 10 November 2014 after being detained under section 136 of the Mental Health Act. While left alone in his room, he forced a fist-sized ball of paper into his throat, causing him to choke; he later died in hospital on 21 November 2014. Concerns included the absence of a documented admission risk assessment, no computerised admission note by the nurse in charge, and the need to consider guidance or training on observation levels, suicide and self-harm risk assessment, risk management, and communication of risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record admission information in computerised Rio notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) During the investigation I heard evidence that the nurse in charge made no record on the computerised Rio notes in relation to the admission. I would ask that you look into the appropriateness of this. ”

    Source location

    Simon Peter REYNOLDS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review Place of Safety staffing levels through the Safer Staffing initiative to support timely observations and information recording.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Reviewing staffing levels on the Place of Safety suite as part of the wider national Safer Staffing initiative, to ensure optimal staffing levels at all times, which will in turn support timely observations and recording of information.”

    Source location

    2015-0296-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The RIO entry was made shortly after the incident, although documentation was delayed while staff managed the traumatic incident and debrief.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Record on Rio The nurse-in-charge should have made an entry on the RIO record. Staff are encouraged to make their written record in as close a proximity to any assessment or event taking place as possible. Since the inquest, we have examined the audit trail of entries on RIO and determined that the entry was made on RIO at 00:11 hours, which was not long after staff had finished dealing with the incident and participating in the debrief. The day-time nurse in charge did not go off duty until 23.00 hours (one and a half hours beyond the end of her shift) in order to handover all necessary information and support staff.”

    Source location

    2015-0296-Avon-and-Wiltshire-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 July 2015

    Open published response
  7. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Joyce Hartford · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joyce Hartford, described as a frail woman with pre-existing co-morbidities, suffered a fall causing a fracture that required surgery. Her health deteriorated and she died at home on 23 January 2015; the medical cause of death included pneumonia, an operated right neck of femur osteoporotic fracture, and caecal carcinoma. The inquest identified incomplete or inaccurate nursing tools, assessments, records, associated documentation, and the nursing discharge summary, with concerns that record-keeping standards had not materially improved.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incomplete or inaccurate nursing records and associated documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the course of the inquest hearing it became apparent that the nursing tools (in particular, the ‘Purpose T’), assessments, records, associated documentation and nursing discharge summary were incomplete and/or inaccurate. Whilst I was told that the Trust, to its credit, had been conducting audits since the Summer of 2014 in order to improve nurse record keeping, Mrs Hartford died in January 2015 and the evidence at inquest did not disclose any material improvement in overall standards. As this was not the first case over which I had presided that involved concerns arising from record keeping that fell below expectation (over and above the aforementioned) I considered that I was under an obligation to bring this to your attention. ”

    Source location

    Joyce Hartford · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review Ward T7 documentation against Trust standards and conduct monthly nursing-metrics audits of record keeping.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We are undertaking a review of current documentation to ensure it meets all Trust standards and therefore supports improvements in care delivery. On a monthly basis the ward is audited using the nursing metrics which includes the quality of record keeping.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit registered nurses to Ward T7 and provide induction competency observations covering documentation and related clinical tasks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Since January 2015 Ward T7 has recruited into a number of vacant registered nurse posts; as part of the induction for these new staff we have developed an induction booklet which includes the requirement for a senior member of the nursing team to observe the staff member undertaking various tasks to confirm that these are being performed competently – this includes completion of documentation such as District Nurse referrals, SKIN bundles (for tissue viability) and Rounding Tools (involves nursing staff using predetermined questions to ask patients on a regular basis about care needs and includes checks on the patient environment.)”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct weekly Ward T7 documentation audits with immediate feedback on risk assessments, care plans and reassessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• There are also weekly audits of documentation undertaken by the Clinical Matron/Unit Manager and the Band 6 Sisters and feedback is given to the relevant member of staff at the time of the audit. These include accurate and timely completion of risk assessments, use of appropriate care plans and timely reassessments.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement scenario training on completing the Purpose T tool for early pressure-ulcer detection and management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• For early detection and management of pressure ulcers the use of scenario training on the completion of the Purpose T tool is now in place. The introduction of an air flow mattress store on the unit now ensures that patients who have suffered a fractured neck of femur are admitted to the Unit from A&E directly onto a ‘pre-socio’ mattress.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run Nursing Care Indicators audits and respond to reduced results through corrective action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Since February 2015, the Unit has achieved 90% and above in the Nursing Care Indicators Audit except for May when the results reduced to 84% and this reduction was responded to immediately recognising that this was related to a trial of incorporating nursing documentation within the medical records. This was addressed and results improved to 92% in June, 95% in July and 93% in August.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use Nursing Metrics across the Trust to audit nursing-documentation quality in case notes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Over the past 18 months Nursing Metrics have been introduced, part of which involves audit of the quality of nursing documentation in the case notes.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue developing and governing nursing documentation through the Nursing Documentation Group and Nursing and Midwifery Board, including wider professional documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Over the last 12 months we have also reviewed the process of developing, reviewing and ratifying nursing documents to implement a more rigorous governance process through our Nursing Documentation Group and the Nursing and Midwifery Board. This project is ongoing. The Nursing Documentation Group has widened its remit to cover Allied Health Professionals and Maternity documentation. The main objective is to align documentation control and development processes across specialties.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Secure Trust Development Agency support and carry out a Trust-wide documentation standardisation project.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• With the support of the Chief Nurse, we have now secured support of a team from the Trust Development Agency to help improve record keeping and a Trust wide documentation standardisation project is underway.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the EVOLVE electronic case-note system, beginning with a pilot of nursing assessments, care plans, referrals and specified risk documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Trust has also commenced the implementation of the ‘EVOLVE’ system which will introduce electronic records across the Trust. This will be piloted later this year and is projected to start on 17th November and run for 4 weeks with a Trust wide rollout projected to take 4 months starting in January 2016. The Project brief is to replace all clinical documentation with electronic forms hosted within the Evolve electronic case-note system. This will help mandate the completion of key patient assessments. The first phase of forms to be piloted on two wards at NMGH will focus on nursing assessment documents, associated care plans and referrals and will include nutritional assessments, falls and bed rails risk assessments, dementia screening and the pressure ulcer care plan.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce Ward Accreditation to monitor ward-team nursing-care quality, including record keeping and patient assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Trust is also introducing Ward Accreditation, a new project which will help us to monitor safe practice by measuring the quality of nursing care delivered by ward teams. As part of this project we will be checking and monitoring the quality of record keeping including patient assessments.”

    Source location

    2015-0279-Response-by-Pennine-Acute-Hositals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 July 2015

    Open published response
  8. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Toni Piel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Toni Piel suffered a head injury in a fall at home on 10 December 2014 and was treated at hospital before being discharged. He was found dead at home on 23 December 2014, with the inquest concluding that he died from a head injury caused by a fall, although it was not established whether this was linked to the earlier injury. Concerns included that his home circumstances and the absence of anyone able to observe him were apparently not considered at discharge, and that risk factors were not documented.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document discharge risk-factor assessments in clinical records

    Wider context from the report

    “i) At the time the deceased was discharged home following the head injury on 10 December 2014 the deceased’s home circumstances were apparently not taken into account. Had such an assessment been made it would have been noted that there was no-one able to observe the deceased at home. The NICE clinical guideline 175 issued January 2014 recommends that this should be taken into account. ii) No assessment of the risk factors in discharging the deceased was documented in the deceased’s records. ”

    Source location

    Toni Piel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Amanda Jane Ellams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amanda Jane Ellams died approximately four days after surgery to repair an incisional hernia in February 2015. The concerns included inadequate medical and nursing record-keeping, incomplete pre-operative medical information, discharge despite low oxygen saturations and inadequate oxygen monitoring, and three unanswered calls to the out-of-hours District Nursing telephone service during the night of her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain complete and accessible medical and nursing records

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the course of the inquest it was apparent that the standard of note keeping at the Alexandra Hospital (both medical and nursing) was well below that which would be generally regarded as satisfactory. There was even one attendance on the patient by the consultant surgeon in February (according to the surgeon’s evidence to me) for which there was no written record whatsoever. The surgeon conceded that he did not have a full medical history available to him pre-operatively and he was not aware of all the prescribed drugs which she was taking. (BMI Healthcare) ”

    Source location

    Amanda Jane Ellams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain and use a hospital-wide documentation standards audit, recording variances and sharing results through peer review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. From June 2015 a new documentation standards audit has been established. The audit is completed by nursing staff and any variances, omissions or errors are recorded and the results shared through a peer review to ensure learning is shared and improvements made, where identified.”

    Source location

    2015-0312-Response-Alexandra-Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 August 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete hospital-wide training on documentation and the legal aspects of patient records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The hospital expects and works to uphold, the highest standards of record keeping. At the time of this response, hospital-wide completion of training on documentation and legal aspects for patient records was 95%. Further documentation training has been scheduled to be delivered by the Royal College of Nursing and we continue to work with all staff and consultants to maintain and improve the standard of record keeping.”

    Source location

    2015-0312-Response-Alexandra-Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 August 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver education sessions to clinical staff on completing patient care pathways.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The company lead for care pathway development has been asked to attend the hospital to deliver education sessions on the completion of patient care pathways to all clinical staff. The delivery of this training is expected to be complete by the end of October 2015.”

    Source location

    2015-0312-Response-Alexandra-Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 August 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Royal College of Nursing presentations to nursing staff on documentation standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. The Royal College of Nursing have been invited to attend the hospital to deliver presentations to nursing staff on the importance of documentation standards. This training is expected to be complete by December 2015.”

    Source location

    2015-0312-Response-Alexandra-Hospital
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 August 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Notify relevant nursing staff that notes must record observations taken after patients are removed from oxygen.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. During September 2015 all relevant nursing staff will be notified that nursing notes should always include a record of observations taken after patients have been taken off oxygen.”

    Source location

    2015-0312-Response-Alexandra-Hospital
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 August 2015

    Open published response
  10. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    MR. ANTHONY GEERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr. Anthony Geerts sustained a fractured neck of femur, underwent surgery and was transferred for rehabilitation before being moved to a nursing home. He later returned to hospital with hospital-acquired pneumonia and a possible urinary tract infection, and died on 21 November 2014. The concerns included inadequate rehabilitation, incomplete records and monitoring, poor communication and discharge planning, and failures in managing his continence, fluid restriction and possible chest infection; the inquest concluded that neglect at Princess Royal Hospital contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete clinical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr. GEERTS went to Princess Royal Hospital to Twineham Ward (the Ward which specialise in Rehabilitation patients coming from The Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton). Mr. GEERTS came with a fractured neck of femur which had been timeously operated. He was determined to return home to his wife who depended on him. He lived in Brighton and Hove and was disappointed to be going to Haywards Heath for rehabilitation as he knew how difficult it would be for his family to visit so regularly. In Brighton he had received physiotherapy and been regularly reviewed. In Haywards Heath he was effectively abandoned from the 6th. His notes give no clue as to how he was cared for. His physiotherapy notes end abruptly with no plan. I was told nurses on this rehabilitation ward had been asked to look after him as (a) There was insufficient physiotherapy staff to do so and (b) Without any or any effective consultation, the decision had been made that he was to be discharged to highgrove Nursing Home as soon as possible after the 6th. Neither Mr. GEERTS nor his family were involved in this decision. Mr. GEERTS had suffered long term mental health issues. These were ignored during his stay at Princess Royal Hospital. His anxieties were not addressed in any meaningful way. He was given no assistance after the 6th. Having been told he was to be transferred for further rehabilitation, Mr. GEERTS remained very anxious about the impending move and about the lack of communication and particularly the lack of physio. For reasons unexplained satisfactorily to this day, he was moved out of Twineham Ward late on the 10th, Bailey Ward was unaware of his needs. He was incontinent of urine. On the 11th he was transferred to the discharge ward from where he contacted his daughter 3 times. He arrived in a poorly state at Highgrove in the mid afternoon. This resulted in him being unable to participate fully in any of the Highgrove activities, nor could he settle in. He was back at The Royal Sussex County Hospital on the 16th with Hospital Acquired Pneumonia and ? urinary tract infection. No more physiotherapy was possible and in spite of ongoing treatment he deteriorated to his death on the 21st. Specifically at Princess Royal Hospital: • Notes not completed. • No nursing notes and no NEWS for 10th or 11th • Fluid chart not completed. Fluid restriction not properly documented. Fluid restriction effectively disregarded. • No plan for physiotherapy • No rehabilitation on Rehabilitation Ward from 6th -10th. Exercise on the 10th not properly documented. • No proper notes of Rationale for transfer to Bailey Ward on 10th/11th. Transfer procedure not followed. Transfer not documented. • No referral of lack of urinary continence. Therefore no plan regarding this. • Failed Trial without catheter on 3rd November 2014. • Bowel monitoring chart not complete • Discharge planning non-existent or inadequate • Communication with patient and family virtually non-existent • No senior review from 4th November 2014; possibility of chest infection not followed up. • Should have had a blood test as requested on 11th November 2014. Did not and therefore unnecessary extra 48 hours on fluid restriction. • Discharge lounge information incorrect. ”

    Source location

    MR. ANTHONY GEERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record nursing observations and NEWS

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr. GEERTS went to Princess Royal Hospital to Twineham Ward (the Ward which specialise in Rehabilitation patients coming from The Royal Sussex County Hospital in Brighton). Mr. GEERTS came with a fractured neck of femur which had been timeously operated. He was determined to return home to his wife who depended on him. He lived in Brighton and Hove and was disappointed to be going to Haywards Heath for rehabilitation as he knew how difficult it would be for his family to visit so regularly. In Brighton he had received physiotherapy and been regularly reviewed. In Haywards Heath he was effectively abandoned from the 6th. His notes give no clue as to how he was cared for. His physiotherapy notes end abruptly with no plan. I was told nurses on this rehabilitation ward had been asked to look after him as (a) There was insufficient physiotherapy staff to do so and (b) Without any or any effective consultation, the decision had been made that he was to be discharged to highgrove Nursing Home as soon as possible after the 6th. Neither Mr. GEERTS nor his family were involved in this decision. Mr. GEERTS had suffered long term mental health issues. These were ignored during his stay at Princess Royal Hospital. His anxieties were not addressed in any meaningful way. He was given no assistance after the 6th. Having been told he was to be transferred for further rehabilitation, Mr. GEERTS remained very anxious about the impending move and about the lack of communication and particularly the lack of physio. For reasons unexplained satisfactorily to this day, he was moved out of Twineham Ward late on the 10th, Bailey Ward was unaware of his needs. He was incontinent of urine. On the 11th he was transferred to the discharge ward from where he contacted his daughter 3 times. He arrived in a poorly state at Highgrove in the mid afternoon. This resulted in him being unable to participate fully in any of the Highgrove activities, nor could he settle in. He was back at The Royal Sussex County Hospital on the 16th with Hospital Acquired Pneumonia and ? urinary tract infection. No more physiotherapy was possible and in spite of ongoing treatment he deteriorated to his death on the 21st. Specifically at Princess Royal Hospital: • Notes not completed. • No nursing notes and no NEWS for 10th or 11th • Fluid chart not completed. Fluid restriction not properly documented. Fluid restriction effectively disregarded. • No plan for physiotherapy • No rehabilitation on Rehabilitation Ward from 6th -10th. Exercise on the 10th not properly documented. • No proper notes of Rationale for transfer to Bailey Ward on 10th/11th. Transfer procedure not followed. Transfer not documented. • No referral of lack of urinary continence. Therefore no plan regarding this. • Failed Trial without catheter on 3rd November 2014. • Bowel monitoring chart not complete • Discharge planning non-existent or inadequate • Communication with patient and family virtually non-existent • No senior review from 4th November 2014; possibility of chest infection not followed up. • Should have had a blood test as requested on 11th November 2014. Did not and therefore unnecessary extra 48 hours on fluid restriction. • Discharge lounge information incorrect. ”

    Source location

    MR. ANTHONY GEERTS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce integrated documentation for all clinical staff treating patients on Twineham ward.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “b) introduction of integrated documentation for use by all the clinical staff treating each patient on the ward”

    Source location

    2015-0240-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 June 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and deliver a Twineham ward training package on accurate documentation and the consequences of poor documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “c) joint development of a training package for all the staff based on Twineham ward, by the senior physiotherapy and nursing staff, to assist with accurate and detailed documentation. This includes a specific focus on the potential consequences of poor documentation”

    Source location

    2015-0240-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 June 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen senior medical review requirements, including consultant reviews, daily review of sick patients, junior attendance and documentation of discussions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “h) review of senior medical input on Twineham ward. The Clinical Director for the musculoskeletal service has emphasized that every patient on Twineham ward should normally be seen by a consultant orthopaedic surgeon or orthogeriatrician at least four times a week (including one day at the weekend), including a conversation with the patient and review of their progress with them. Any patient who is sick should be seen daily by a consultant. The junior medical staff have been reminded that they must attend with the consultant, and should record every such discussion in the notes, if the consultant does not do this themselves”

    Source location

    2015-0240-Response-by-Brighton-and-Sussex-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 June 2015

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026