Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Iris Elaine Fordham · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Iris Elaine Fordham was admitted to hospital after an unwitnessed fall and concerns about her ability to keep herself safe due to Alzheimer’s disease. Failures to complete a falls risk assessment, falls care plan and enhanced care assessment led to the removal of 1:1 care, after which she sustained a fractured neck of femur in a further unwitnessed fall. She underwent surgical repair and died in a step-down care centre; concerns included poor clinical record-keeping, failures in falls-risk management and the absence of action through disciplinary or regulatory channels.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor quality of clinical record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The poor quality of recording clinical records impeded the Trust's governance processes, in that the author of a serious incident investigation was unable to rely on clear evidence to understand why essential actions were not carried out in Ms Fordham's care. ”

    Source location

    Iris Elaine Fordham · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Hampshire, Portsmouth and Southampton

    AI-generated summary

    Jack FARRINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jack Farrington, who had a long history of mental health difficulties and was detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act, died on 2 January 2020 after running from an emergency department and falling from a road bridge. The report raised concerns about fragmented access to medical records, inadequate handovers and record keeping, insufficient flagging and assessment of absconding and self-harm risks, and the implementation of measures intended to keep him safe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to properly record, store or audit paper observations and records

    Wider context from the report

    “Solent NHS Trust still relies on paper forms for some observations and record keeping within the mental health unit. In Jack’s case these were not scanned and stored which hampered the investigation and inquest. There remains a risk that where paper records are kept information is not properly recorded, stored or audited. ”

    Source location

    Jack FARRINGTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Attend inpatient handovers, audit clinical records, and escalate audit outcomes through governance meetings to assure handover quality and accuracy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to mitigate the risk that the continued use of the handover outside of SystmOne presents, our Clinical Leadership Team are attending handovers to ensure good quality conversation and accuracy of information handed over and undertaking a quality audit of the clinical records. The outcomes from audits are then presented at the Inpatient Governance Meeting and can be escalated to the Mental Health Service Senior Leadership Team at Integrated Governance Meeting if required.”

    Source location

    Response from Solent NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 13 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Replace paper-based clinical observation forms with electronic forms feeding directly into SystmOne, including tablet procurement and ward testing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Mental Health Service continues to record various clinical observations on paper-based forms, which are scanned into SystmOne. This includes therapeutic engagement and observations, physical observations, food and fluid charts. The service is working towards replacing the paper-based forms with an electronic form that feeds directly into SystmOne, and I am pleased to report that work is on track and planned to be implemented by 01st April 2024. The Service’s Clinical Matron has visited departments within Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust to view the system in use and is meeting regularly with Solent NHS Trust Information Specialist to ensure this will be ready to implement on time. This change also involves the procurement of tablets to record the information on, which will be tested in all areas of the wards.”

    Source location

    Response from Solent NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide temporary staff and partner mental health teams with electronic access to document assessments and care plans in Oceano.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the ED, bank and temporary members of staff are provided with a temporary ICT login, and a login for Oceano allowing for electronic documentation of patient assessment and delivery of care. Our partner organisations, Solent NHS Trust, and Southern Health Foundation Trust mental health teams, also now have access to Oceano allowing them to input their assessments and plan of care directly into the Trust’s ICT system negating the need for paper records.”

    Source location

    Response from Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the Integrated Care Board and regional acute trusts towards a paper-free electronic patient record.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust fully agrees that the current hybrid between paper and electronic records creates greater complexity and inefficiency, impacting the ability of the multidisciplinary teams to locate all necessary information for each patient. The ambition of PHU and similar NHS Trusts who have not already done so is to move to a true paper free Electronic Patient Record (EPR). We are working with the Integrated Care Board (ICB) and other Acute Trusts in Hampshire and Isle of Wight to achieve that goal over time.”

    Source location

    Response from Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 November 2023

    Open published response
  3. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Audrey King · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Audrey King was admitted for femoral hernia obstruction and underwent repair on 6 November 2022. Her apixaban was suspended for surgery and not restarted; she suffered a severe stroke on 11 November and died four days later. The principal concerns were inconsistent record keeping between specialties, inadequate alerting when important handwritten notes were made, and no EPMA alert requiring review of the ongoing medication suspension.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inconsistencies in record keeping between specialities

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Inconsistencies in record keeping between specialities. ”

    Source location

    Audrey King · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Progress the contracted integrated electronic patient record programme toward operational use from Spring 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is moving towards having all clinical records available electronically and Oracle Health have been awarded the contract for our Electronic Patient Record (EPR) programme. The new EPR will integrate many of our digital and paper-based systems into a single platform, providing a more joined up way of working across our hospitals, improving safety and transforming the way we care. This system is expected to be operational from Spring 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require inpatient clinical entries to be recorded in written paper notes, except in specified intensive-care areas, with the change communicated and effective from 13 September 2023.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Until this is underway, the Trust has taken the decision to advise all specialties to only record inpatient clinical entries in the written paper notes with the exception of EPMA (which is our electronic prescribing system). The only ward exceptions to this are ITU /EPOC (Intensive care and Enhanced peri-operative care unit) which have an electronic record and high staff to patient ratio, there is no duplication and a paper copy is transferred with the patient when they leave ITU/EPOC. This will ensure all specialities undertaking ward rounds will have one set of written notes to review, along with the drugs chart (ePMA) The decision to revert to recording in the written notes was communication to staff and took effect from 08:00 hours on 13 September 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Because specialties must record inpatient entries in paper notes, no electronic alert is considered necessary for handwritten clinical entries.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Until this is underway, the Trust has taken the decision to advise all specialties to only record inpatient clinical entries in the written paper notes with the exception of EPMA (which is our electronic prescribing system). The only ward exceptions to this are ITU /EPOC (Intensive care and Enhanced peri-operative care unit) which have an electronic record and high staff to patient ratio, there is no duplication and a paper copy is transferred with the patient when they leave ITU/EPOC. This will ensure all specialities undertaking ward rounds will have one set of written notes to review, along with the drugs chart (ePMA) The decision to revert to recording in the written notes was communication to staff and took effect from 08:00 hours on 13 September 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 September 2023

    Open published response
  4. Gateshead and South Tyneside

    AI-generated summary

    William Nichols · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Nichols underwent a femoral endarterectomy and developed a deep patch infection, followed by a catastrophic haemorrhage from the right femoral artery. The report identifies concerns about inconsistent communication between hospital and community teams, insufficient documented discharge advice, poor communication about bleeding concerns, and inadequate community-team record keeping.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the community team to consistently record key clinical assessment information

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) Poor record keeping from the community team which meant that key clinical assessment information was not consistently recorded. ”

    Source location

    William Nichols · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make changes to electronic clinical-record proformas to strengthen record keeping and capture accurate, relevant clinical information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As referred to in the inquest, at the time of Mr Nichols' death, the Trust had only very recently moved to a fully electronic records system. This system is now fully embedded and since Mr Nichols' death, 4 years ago, numerous changes have been made to the electronic proformas to strengthen record keeping and capture accurate and key clinical information.”

    Source location

    Response from Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust disputes that key clinical information was inconsistently recorded, stating that information was recorded and concerns were appropriately escalated.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having reviewed the evidence, we are unable to ascertain where this concern arises from, which makes it difficult to respond directly. However, we would be more than willing to address this further if more detail about the concern could be provided.”

    Source location

    Response from Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 September 2023

    Open published response
  5. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Malcolm Ralph Unwin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Malcolm Ralph Unwin suffered an unwitnessed fall from his bed while a patient at hospital on 30 December 2022 and died at Wrexham Maelor Hospital on 6 January 2023. The report raised concern that he had not been assessed for bed rails and that the absence of bed-rail assessment from the Welsh Nursing Care Record could result in such assessments being missed in future.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to include bed rail assessment in the Welsh Nursing Care Record

    Wider context from the report

    “There was no evidence that the deceased had been assessed for bed rails, whilst in hospital although it is probable that they were in due at the time of his fall. Evidence was given that the bed rail assessment is not currently a part of the Welsh Nursing Care Record which staff access via iPad. In the absence of this being a part of the WNCR I am concerned that this assessment may be missed, and that future death may occur as a result. ”

    Source location

    Malcolm Ralph Unwin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise the bed-rail assessment issue nationally to expedite standardisation and inclusion in the WNCR.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following your Notice, we raised this issue nationally in order to expedite this process. The issue was discussed at the National Deputy Directors of Nursing Meeting on 07 September 2023, and in response Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board has taken the lead in establishing a national working group to create a standardised bed rails assessment tool across Wales, and to propose this single version for inclusion in the WNCR.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind ward managers, matrons and heads of nursing about paper-based bed-rail assessments and provide materials for staff safety briefings and ward display.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the interim period, I can confirm we have written to all ward managers, matrons and heads of nursing reminding them of the process for paper based assessment forms. We have provided information which can be used on ward safety briefs with staff and which can also be visibly placed in wards to remind staff.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise and introduce the updated Bed Rails Procedure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We are also in the process of finalising our updated Bed Rails Procedure which will be live within the next few weeks.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 September 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Creation of a standardised bed-rails assessment tool is being led nationally by Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following your Notice, we raised this issue nationally in order to expedite this process. The issue was discussed at the National Deputy Directors of Nursing Meeting on 07 September 2023, and in response Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board has taken the lead in establishing a national working group to create a standardised bed rails assessment tool across Wales, and to propose this single version for inclusion in the WNCR.”

    Source location

    Response from Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 September 2023

    Open published response
  6. Leicester City and South Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Marie ZARINS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marie Zarins, aged 42, was reported missing by her family and found suspended in Leicestershire; her death was confirmed at the scene on 24 November 2021. The report raised concerns about flawed multidisciplinary team discussions, inaccurate understanding and documentation of her medication status, failures to prescribe antidepressants and sleeping tablets, and inadequacies in the subsequent serious incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete and retain sufficiently detailed MDT discussion documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “2) I remain concerned about both the standard of documentation and lack of documentation relating to the discussion of Miss Zarins at the two MDT meetings. The Trust were only able to provide me with documentation relating to one of the two MDT meetings. That documentation is incorrectly completed and lacks detail. In particular, there is no detail about medication despite there being a specific box within which to document this. This problem of poor and/or missing documentation is not a risk that is limited to the CRISIS Team, it is one that could have ramifications not only across the Trust but across all of the bodies who come together to provide care for patients. ”

    Source location

    Marie ZARINS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review Crisis Team MDT processes and improve the functionality of recording and documenting MDT meeting notes through a quality improvement programme.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to learn and improve, the Trust has actioned a quality improvement programme which will review our MDT processes and improve the functionality of the recording and documenting of MDT meeting notes. This is focussed within the Crisis Team initially and will be further rolled out to Community Mental Health Teams and inpatient areas. We will capture the learning from this inquest and other SI reports produced by the Trust and will share this learning across the Trust through our learning forums and Quality Improvement Collaboratives.”

    Source location

    Response from Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 September 2023

    Open published response
  7. North Yorkshire and York

    AI-generated summary

    Carole MCQUINN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carole MCQUINN underwent pancreatic surgery in February 2022 and subsequently experienced pancreatic leakage, abdominal collections and prolonged hospital treatment. After discharge without a discharge note, medication or follow-up appointment, concerns about infection were not adequately recorded or escalated, and a positive swab result was not reviewed until several days later. She was later admitted with suspected intra-abdominal sepsis and was found unresponsive in hospital; the inquest concluded that she died from a pulmonary embolism likely related to post-operative infection, inflammation and immobility.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record clinical observations during hospital attendance

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Trust staff interacting with the deceased and her daughter regarding infection concerns arising in the post-discharge period between 21/4/22 and 3/5/22 made no records of the same. Nursing staff were shown photographs of the deceased's drain site, and issued stoma bags and a swab to her daughter for suspected infection, but did not flag this development to the treating team or make arrangements for the results of the swabs to be reviewed. No clinical observations of the deceased were recorded when she attended the hospital on 3/5/22. The swab result did not come to anyone's attention or get reviewed until the deceased's daughter flagged the issue to staff on 3/5/22. These omissions led to missed opportunities for earlier assessment and treatment of the deceased. ”

    Source location

    Carole MCQUINN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record inter-hospital clinical communications

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The deceased had an emergency admission to York Hospital on 4/5/22 with suspected intra-abdominal sepsis. A York doctor was verbally tasked with communicating with the surgical team at Leeds to report back on a comparison of CT scans from both hospitals. No record of this contact - which was verbally reported in positive terms - was made by either hospital and no evidence could be provided as to who had spoken to whom and in what terms. Further, despite the lengthy and complex treatment the deceased had undergone in Leeds, and her attendance there the day prior to admission to York, no contact was made by the treating team at York with the treating team at Leeds, to allow for additional specialist input into the deceased's management and consideration of possible transfer of care. ”

    Source location

    Carole MCQUINN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update and disseminate clinical record-keeping guidance to clinical staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On review of this matter it became apparent that the Trust’s clinical record-keeping guidance was out of date. This was already on the work plan to be updated and will now be expedited. Once the guidance is finalised it will be shared with all clinical staff.”

    Source location

    Response from York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Draft and send a patient safety briefing to all staff on documenting clinician communications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Number | Recommendation | Action | Lead | Completion Date | Evidence Required 1 | Raise awareness amongst all clinicians of the need to document discussions and communications between clinicians within and external to the Trust | Patient Safety Briefing to be drafted and sent to all staff | Patient Safety Lead | September 2023 | Copy of briefing 2 | Ensure Trust policy and guidance is clear on requirements for clinical record keeping | Review and update of Trust guidance on clinical record keeping | Head of Information Governance | February 2024 | Policy/guidance published and awareness raised 3 | Raise awareness of this case amongst surgical colleagues to stress the importance of recording communications | Case is presented at Surgical Clinical Governance meeting | Consultant Surgeon | October 2023 | Minutes of meeting”

    Source location

    Response from York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Present the case to surgical colleagues at a Surgical Clinical Governance meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Number | Recommendation | Action | Lead | Completion Date | Evidence Required 1 | Raise awareness amongst all clinicians of the need to document discussions and communications between clinicians within and external to the Trust | Patient Safety Briefing to be drafted and sent to all staff | Patient Safety Lead | September 2023 | Copy of briefing 2 | Ensure Trust policy and guidance is clear on requirements for clinical record keeping | Review and update of Trust guidance on clinical record keeping | Head of Information Governance | February 2024 | Policy/guidance published and awareness raised 3 | Raise awareness of this case amongst surgical colleagues to stress the importance of recording communications | Case is presented at Surgical Clinical Governance meeting | Consultant Surgeon | October 2023 | Minutes of meeting”

    Source location

    Response from York and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use Patient Pass to coordinate and record referrals, information requests and advice between hospitals and specialist departments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since this death the AMS CSU has started to use new IT software (Patient Pass) to improve coordination and recording of requests for information and advice. Patient Pass is a two-way messaging tool that is used to facilitate referrals and improve communication between hospitals and specialist departments. It is relied on by a number of specialist teams in LTHT to speed up referrals and support clinical process reliability. It improves record keeping as details of referrals and responses are automatically saved onto patients’ PPM+ records and it also provides the organisation with a full audit trail for information governance purposes.”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust has no record or recollection of any communication from York Hospital about the deceased’s admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. As explained in the evidence for the inquest the Trust has no record of contact made by clinicians from York Hospital about the deceased’s admission there on Wednesday 4/5/22 or on Thursday 5/5/22 and no member of the surgical team recalls a discussion about the deceased with anyone in York on either day.”

    Source location

    Response from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 July 2023

    Open published response
  8. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Philip Hawkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Philip Hawkins, aged 97, suffered a fall at home on 18 March 2023, was transferred by ambulance to hospital, and died on 23 March 2023. Concerns included delays in being admitted and allocated a bed, insufficient staffing, inability to provide care, gaps in nursing documentation, and failures in aspects of assessment and treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of written nursing documentation of patient care

    Wider context from the report

    “Care Concerns in the ED 4. On 18.03.22 at 02:49 there was no space for a nurse to attend to Mr Hawkins’ personal care needs or assess his pressure areas. 5. On 19.03.23 at 12:18, Mr Hawkins needed ‘repeat bloods’ but this was never done nor highlighted to clinicians. 6. On 19.03.23 at 00:31 Mr Hawkins was given oxygen but there are no nursing notes to indicate why or whether this was discussed with a clinician. 7. There is no written nursing documentation in relation to Mr Hawkins’ care from 21:52 on 19.03.23. 8. Mr Hawkins was nil by mouth but this was not made known to visitors who fed him. ”

    Source location

    Philip Hawkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    June Peel · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Peel, a resident at Belle Green Court Care Home, sustained a displaced distal femur fracture that was not identified or medically assessed promptly. She underwent surgery after admission to hospital and did not recover, dying on a palliative care pathway. The principal concerns were failures to follow her care plan, record and hand over information about her knee injury, and seek timely medical attention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record injuries from body maps in daily communication records

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There was a failure to record the injury from the body map in the daily communication records both on 3rd June and 6th June, and a failure to pass that information on at handover (or to document that the information had been passed on). This led to a period in which June was being turned on a 2 hourly basis with a displaced femur fracture. ”

    Source location

    June Peel · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prepare, distribute and display record-keeping guidance, and require all staff to review it and the record-keeping policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Taken Although staff received training and guidance on record keeping during their induction, we have policies in place that set out the action that is expected of staff and records are also audited regularly to ensure that staff are meeting the required standards, the documentation was not of the required standard. Accordingly, we have implemented the following changes:”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 8 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide record-keeping training during induction and staff supervisions throughout the year.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Staff receive training on record keeping on induction and supervisions will be carried out throughout the year.”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 8 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review record-keeping quality through weekly and monthly management audits and documentation spot checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. The quality of record keeping is reviewed regularly by the management team as part of the weekly and monthly audits. The Manager also undertakes spot checks on documentation.”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 8 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen staff communication by requiring documented concerns, daily records, written handovers, shift briefings and review of relevant resident records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Taken We have taken the following action to ensure information is effectively communicated across the team;”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 9 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a Referral for Medical Attention policy requiring prompt clinical referral, documented professional guidance, care-plan updates and recorded follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Taken We have implemented a new policy ‘Referral for Medical Attention’. Staff must not exercise their judgement as to whether urgent referral/ treatment is required or whether assessment can be delayed. The policy requires that”

    Source location

    Response from Belle Green Court Care Home
    Page 10 · response
    Published 4 August 2025

    Open published response
  10. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Ann Hatch · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Ann Hatch underwent repeat hiatus hernia surgery at a private hospital on 31 August 2022 and became unwell overnight. She was transferred to an NHS hospital, treated for septic shock and organ failure for six weeks, and died on 18 October 2022. The report identifies concerns about overnight monitoring, escalation, staffing competence, record-keeping, and delays in investigations and treatment; evidence at the Inquest indicated that the failings contributed to her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate clinical record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “5. The records kept were inaccurate; for example, there was no record of oxygen being provided around 2 am. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann Hatch · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to reconcile clinical documentation with the patient’s observed condition

    Wider context from the report

    “11. The RMO was the senior doctor at the hospital overnight. The RMO recorded a note at 8.45 am “feeling much better now”. The Inquest noted a discrepancy between this comment and the fact that Mrs Hatch was deemed too unwell to be moved to the radiology department at 9.10am, some 25 minutes later. ”

    Source location

    Carol Ann Hatch · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026