Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Shropshire, Telford and Wrekin

    AI-generated summary

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    The deceased had a history of mental health issues, self-harm and two suicide attempts, and was in contact with mental health services until the evening of 30 April 2018 before taking her own life the next morning. Concerns included a prolonged delay in accessing IAPT counselling and difficulties with the electronic recording, risk assessment and progress-note systems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to accurately record progress notes and risk assessments

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Risk assessment and progress notes. a) The electronic records were hard for a lay person to follow or understand particularly when said to have been updated or validated with the potential for original entries to have been overwritten (as opposed to amended or deleted). If the user of the system understands it then that does not make it unfit for purpose but it was not clear how a user would readily see what had originally been written. b) This is distinct from progress notes and/or risk assessments being accurately recorded. It was not clear when and how often risk assessments should be updated and how and when they would be read in conjunction with the progress notes. Were risk assessments intended to be summaries if a user did not have time to read all the progress notes? What function were they intended to serve? Consideration should be given as to whether the system can be improved. ”

    Source location

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to validate records and routinely audit unvalidated notes, providing audit feedback to clinical teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “validated by others. We have issued a reminder to staff to validate their records and a regular audit of un-validated notes is undertaken with feedback of the audit outcome being sent to the clinical teams.”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Extend mandatory clinical risk management training to cover the revised mental-health risk assessment and management procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SOP describes how the FACE Tool is used to gather information about risk, both current and historical, and then to use this information in formulation which is an evidence based clinical decision making process enabling a robust risk management plan to be developed specifically addressing the individual patient’s needs. This risk management plan will then be incorporated into the patient’s overall care plan. Monitoring of this care plan is through the patient’s progress notes. When there is a significant change in presentation the risk assessment is re-evaluated, risk management plan updated and reference made to this in the progress notes. In order to ensure that staff are competent in this process, the clinical risk management training, which is mandatory for all clinical staff to complete every 3 years, will cover the revised Standard Operating Procedures.”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 May 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Automatic validation of all electronic records is not achievable because some staff entries must be validated by other staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In regard to the validation of notes, legally it is only students who must have their records validated by a qualified member of staff. All other staff are required to validate their own entries. The action of validating the entry represents the electronic signature of the accuracy and confirmation of that entry. The Trust has explored with our healthcare information colleagues whether the default could be an automatic validation which is then “unticked” but this is not achievable given that some staff must have their entries”

    Source location

    Response from Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 May 2024

    Open published response
  2. West London

    AI-generated summary

    Henry Curtis-Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Henry Curtis-Williams died from hanging at Acton Cemetery on 17 May 2018; the inquest conclusion was hanging and suicide. Concerns included inadequate contemporaneous recording, discharge by junior doctors without prior senior review, and informal communication without records of important messages.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record contemporaneous clinical notes, including presence or absence of suicidal ideation

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) That following admission to Southgate Ward Henry Curtis-Williams was seen by a number of different staff members. It became evident that there was a culture of not recording contemporaneous notes. This was very obvious with reference to recording presence or absence of suicidal ideation. ”

    Source location

    Henry Curtis-Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    John Duckenfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Duckenfield was receiving intermediate care following a fall and was later admitted to Northern General Hospital, where he died on 21 January 2018. The inquest identified concerns about falsely asserted and unrecorded observations, failure to call a GP when requested, and inaccurate or misleading care-home records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate and misleading care records

    Wider context from the report

    “During the inquest, evidence showed:- 1. ████████ falsely asserted he had taken observations of Mr Duckenfield in the presence of the family. Not only I, but safeguarding also, felt this assertion was dishonest. 2. He failed to record observations he said he carried out despite accepting a need to do so. 3. Falsely asserted he was never asked to call a GP 4. The care home manager, ████████ said observations should have been taken daily and recorded but were not. Surprisingly therefore, she asserted the care rendered was reasonable. 5. Records kept by the home were inaccurate and misleading. ”

    Source location

    John Duckenfield · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement procedures for resident observations, recording, communicating treatment requirements to relatives, and reporting baseline changes to professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• I attach a procedure regarding observations (resident observation P52) and the recording of such (specific observations F13u and monthly observations F13l). The objective of this procedure is to: ◦ ensure that the residents are observed relevant to their condition/diagnosis; ◦ ensure that the observations are recorded; ◦ make sure relatives are fully aware of the observations and treatment required as a result of the observations; and ◦ ensure changes in baseline observations are reported to other professionals.”

    Source location

    2018-0389-Response-by-Brancaster-Care-Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train all registered nurses to complete contemporaneous records in accordance with NMC guidelines.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• My client organised staff training to ensure that record keeping is undertaken contemporaneously and follows NMC guidelines. All registered nurses attended this training which took place on 3, 8, 9 and 10 January 2019;”

    Source location

    2018-0389-Response-by-Brancaster-Care-Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct scheduled monthly internal and external audits of care records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Audit checks on care records are undertaken by home managers but also by other home managers external to the home on a scheduled monthly basis. These audits are ongoing;”

    Source location

    2018-0389-Response-by-Brancaster-Care-Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 May 2019

    Open published response
  4. West Yorkshire (West)

    AI-generated summary

    BARNABY LUKE AYLWARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barnaby Luke Aylward died in the early hours of 4 September 2017 after being overcome by smoke from an accidental house fire caused more likely than not by a lit cigarette. The report identified concerns about known fire risks associated with his heavy smoking, clutter and serious mental illness, including insufficient multi-agency risk assessment, information sharing, property inspection, care planning and preventative support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record significant clutter and associated risk in clinical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The presence of clutter and thus risk was not always evidenced in other clinical notes as a symptom of Mr Aylward's illness of significance as were other presentations of his illness. ”

    Source location

    BARNABY LUKE AYLWARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    John Michael KIRBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Michael KIRBY took his own life, according to the conclusion of the inquest. The concerns included delays in his care, the handling of an ADHD diagnosis and Concerta prescribing, inadequate monitoring, and failures to respond appropriately to information about suicidal thoughts, a reported suicide attempt, substance use and an A&E admission.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record the consultation about the impact of the ADHD diagnosis

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The delay in dealing with Mr Kirby between August 2017 and March 2018. (2) I am concerned about the decision to ask him to complete ADHD questionnaires and apparently suggest that he should be prescribed Concerta. (3) I am concerned that although ████████ told me he had made a diagnosis of ADHD in October 2017 he did not follow the NICE Guidance, inform the GP, start prescribing, consider alternatives to prescribing, have a formal note made of the consultation with John when the impact of this diagnosis was discussed with him or discuss the diagnosis with his immediate next of kin. (4) On the last occasion when John was seen, ie. on March the 20th diagnosis of ADHD was discussed and ████████ decided not to prescribe Concerta. A few weeks later, in April, he received a letter from Mr Kirby’s GP explaining that John wanted to be prescribed Concerta and also saying that he had had an admission to A&E. This did not provoke any further review of Mr Kirby, he was simply prescribed the medication without any discussion as to his previous drug abuse or current dependence on Diazepam, suicidal tendencies or binge drinking. This is outwith the Guidance issued by NICE. (5) Why was Mr Kirby prescribed Concerta without any (further) review? (6) Why was he not properly monitored as he should have been had the NICE Guidance been adhered too? (7) Even if Concerta had not been prescribed the GP letter and the information in the electronic records as to the A&E admission on the 4th-5th April should have alerted the Trust to the information John had given that he was suicidal and “wanted to die”. (8) Why did those interviewing John in A&E not take more details of the suicide attempt when he said that recently he had tried to hang himself and only failed because the rope broke? ”

    Source location

    John Michael KIRBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Veronica Gregory · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Veronica Gregory, who was 83 and living in a nursing and care home, suffered an unwitnessed incident followed by a delayed recognition of pain and a fractured neck of femur. She underwent surgery, developed pneumonia and died on 23 November 2017. The principal concerns included inadequate falls-risk care planning and review, incomplete observation and clinical records, insufficient staffing and supervision, and failures to seek medical assistance promptly.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make full and appropriate clinical records of physical examinations and resulting actions

    Wider context from the report

    “3. A failure to ensure that full and appropriate clinical records of any physical examination and action taken as a result being made. In addition, failure to refer to appropriate NICE Guidelines and comply with them. ”

    Source location

    Veronica Gregory · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train and remind staff to document incident monitoring, physical examinations, actions taken, and handovers promptly and clearly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to staff having been trained, they are reminded during staff meetings and one-to-one supervisions to record any incident/accident that occurs during their shift and to hand such over to the next shift. Staff member must be specific on the type of monitoring that they have undertaken following an incident or accident, e.g. vital signs and physical examination of the Resident. They are reminded that these must be recorded promptly and clearly.”

    Source location

    2018-0377-Response-by-Zinnia-Healthcare
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 May 2019

    Open published response
  7. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    John Lea · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Lea was admitted to hospital for management of heart failure and was later found collapsed on the ward after the bay-tagging nurse temporarily left without arranging monitoring. Resuscitation was unsuccessful and his death was confirmed on 12 June 2017; the report considered a sudden cardiac-related event more likely than not. Concerns included incomplete risk assessments, poor communication, gaps in documentation, failure to escalate a change in oxygen saturations, incorrectly calculated NEWS scores, and failures to follow relevant policies and protocols.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Gaps in clinical documentation and record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Gaps within the documentation/record keeping/missing entries by both doctors and nurses (including fluid balance charts for a patient in heart failure and subject to fluid restriction, risk assessments, care planning, rounding tool and medical attendance upon the deceased). ”

    Source location

    John Lea · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Michelle Roach · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michelle Roach’s inquest was heard at Reading Town Hall between 6 and 9 November 2018, and the narrative conclusion recorded that natural causes contributed to by neglect in her clinical management from 09:11 on 29 January 2014 until 18:07 on 30 January 2014. Concerns related to GP knowledge of venous thromboembolism, record-keeping and reviews of unexpected deaths, as well as the level of overnight medical registrar cover at the hospital trust.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deficient GP record-keeping practices

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) I believe ████████ should review her record-keeping practices. ”

    Source location

    Michelle Roach · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deficient GP record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The GP practice should review their system for investigating unexpected deaths in order to learn from them and improve clinical management. It should also audit and review ████████ clinical knowledge in this area and her record keeping. ”

    Source location

    Michelle Roach · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. South Yorkshire (Eastern)

    AI-generated summary

    Roy Burgess · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roy Burgess, aged 87, was admitted after a fall at home that caused a left femoral fracture and was transferred for surgery. The report identified missed opportunities to recognise and escalate his deteriorating condition, inadequate clinical record-keeping, and untimed ward-round notes entered non-chronologically. The inquest concluded that it was unlikely that intervention would have altered the outcome.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enter timed ward-round dictated notes in chronological order

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Finally, untimed dictated notes of ward rounds, were then entered into the records in a non-chronological order, which was unhelpful and potentially misleading ”

    Source location

    Roy Burgess · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record clinician input following escalation in clinical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) Inadequate record keeping by clinician within the Clinical notes. There were numerous examples of care having been escalated by nursing staff to doctors but no record of their input following this escalation was entered in the notes, e.g. on 4th December 2017, Mr Burgess’s care was escalated between 11:40 hours and 16:30 hours on at least 5 occasions and no entries were placed in his clinical records. This could have had a detrimental effect on his care and if this practice continues it will potentially affect other patients. ”

    Source location

    Roy Burgess · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Sarah Kiff · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sarah Kiff experienced repeated consultations for vaginal discharge, urinary symptoms, heavy menstruation and lower abdominal pain before cervical cancer was diagnosed after an urgent referral in July 2013. The cancer had metastasised to the liver and, after treatment and subsequent decline, she suffered a cardiac arrest and died at Fairfield General Hospital on 14 October 2015. The report identified concerns about failure to follow cancer referral guidance, inadequate examination and history-taking, poor record-keeping and communication, lack of continuity of care, reluctance to perform internal examinations, and inadequate processes for reviewing test results.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate processes for recording test results in electronic patient records

    Wider context from the report

    “5. The processes and procedures in place for reviewing test results and ensuring that they appear within the patient's electronic records appears to be inadequate. ”

    Source location

    Sarah Kiff · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor medical record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Medical record keeping and communication between the medical and nursing teams was poor. The doctor's were not explicit about what they required the nurse to do in terms of P.V. examination and made assumption that the nurse/s knew what the doctors expected of them. ”

    Source location

    Sarah Kiff · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use updated diagnostic-result processes to action results on receipt, arrange follow-up for results requiring it, notify patients appropriately, and audit actions in clinical records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The practice has robust processes in place to ensure all diagnostics are actioned on the same day of receipt and where there is an abnormal result these are followed up with the patient. The GP can readily look in the clinical records to review why the test was performed. On most occasions the GP who orders the test will be reviewing the results, but this is not always possible due to patterns of working. In addition, some providers return results to the registered GP rather than the one requesting the test.”

    Source location

    2017-0407-Response-by-Stonefield-Street-Surgery
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Refresh doctors’ knowledge of GMC record-keeping guidance and improve the detail of clinical documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Review of the medical records for Miss Kiff has highlighted that the record keeping was not adequate, and this has allowed the clinical staff to review the method for clinical note recording, ensuring in future that more detailed records are kept. Each clinician has now reviewed the GMC guidance on record keeping in Good Medical Practice (2013) at paragraphs 19-21.”

    Source location

    2017-0407-Response-by-Stonefield-Street-Surgery
    Page 3 · response
    Published 26 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Test results were clearly visible in the electronic record, contrary to the concern that results were not appearing within patient records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All test results relating to Miss Sarah Kiff are clearly visible within the patient electronic record. The EMIS computer system records date test requested date received, date of review and filing as well as any practice notes made by the doctor. The report comments on the Ultrasound Scan result for Miss Kiff, but the records clearly show that the report was received on the 25th February, seen and noted to be normal and filed in the patient record, so this was unfortunately not available for her appointment with Dr Younis on 22nd February 2013. This is all auditable within the clinical system.”

    Source location

    2017-0407-Response-by-Stonefield-Street-Surgery
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing diagnostic-result processes ensure tests are actioned on receipt, abnormal results are followed up, and actions are auditable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The practice has robust processes in place to ensure all diagnostics are actioned on the same day of receipt and where there is an abnormal result these are followed up with the patient. The GP can readily look in the clinical records to review why the test was performed. On most occasions the GP who orders the test will be reviewing the results, but this is not always possible due to patterns of working. In addition, some providers return results to the registered GP rather than the one requesting the test.”

    Source location

    2017-0407-Response-by-Stonefield-Street-Surgery
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 February 2018

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026