Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Richard Drewry · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Richard Drewry had a history of anxiety and low mood, with deteriorating mental health and episodes involving knives shortly before he was found with a ligature around his neck on 3 April 2017. He sustained fatal injuries, suffered an unsurvivable hypoxic brain injury, and died in hospital on 8 April 2017. The substantive concerns were failures by the Crisis Team to provide consistent and continuous care, make accurate and prompt records, and escalate concerns appropriately and promptly.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make accurate and prompt records of consultations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The failure of the Crisis Team to make accurate and prompt records of all consultations with the deceased; ”

    Source location

    Michael Richard Drewry · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train and instruct Crisis Team staff, and provide software and devices, to support contemporaneous recording of consultations in RiO.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Crisis Team staff are fully aware that contemporaneous notes must be recorded about the patient and must be written at the time of the event or as soon afterwards on the Trust Patient Information System (RiO).”

    Source location

    2017-0386-Response-by-Nottinghamshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor compliance with timely RiO recording through monthly managerial supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On occasion, staff do have to return to base due to the intermittent availability of the telecom service signal/network therefore delaying the entry on the RiO system. Staff have been reminded of the importance of this in team meetings (held 31/01/2018) and will be monitored ongoing in managerial supervision on a monthly basis.”

    Source location

    2017-0386-Response-by-Nottinghamshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Prompt recording can be delayed when intermittent telecommunications signals prevent staff from entering notes remotely.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Crisis Team staff are fully aware that contemporaneous notes must be recorded about the patient and must be written at the time of the event or as soon afterwards on the Trust Patient Information System (RiO).”

    Source location

    2017-0386-Response-by-Nottinghamshire-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response
  2. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Ronald Arthur Farrington · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ronald Arthur Farrington, who had dementia and Parkinson’s disease and was resident in a nursing home, developed infected sacral pressure sores. He was admitted to hospital with sepsis and died on 21 June 2016; the inquest recorded sepsis caused by infection in the pressure sore, with pneumonia contributing. The substantive concerns included failures to follow and record tissue-viability advice, failure to refer the infection to his general practitioner, inadequate tissue-viability nurse availability, and insufficient independent investigation by the CQC and safeguarding review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to keep accurate care records

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Nuffield Care Centre: a.) Failed to incorporate all the advice given by the tissue viability nurses in Mr Farrington’s care plans. b.) Failed to keep accurate records. c.) Informed the CQC that the tissue viability nurses were still involved with Mr Farrington when they weren’t. d.) Failed to follow the advice of the tissue viability nurses as to turning and how to dress Mr Farrington’s sores e.) Failed to refer Mr Farrington to his General Practitioner when he developed an infection in the sacral pressure sore on the 1st June 2016. ”

    Source location

    Ronald Arthur Farrington · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Margaret Ellen Postill · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Margaret Ellen Postill, a resident with dementia at Sunnyside Care Home, fell twice on 2 May 2017 and later developed seizures after a subdural hematoma was identified. She deteriorated over the following weeks, was moved to palliative care, and died on 31 May 2017. Concerns included the lack of evaluation and completed assessment sheets after her return to the care home, and poor-quality documentation at Tameside Hospital concerning the second visit and decision-making.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor-quality documentation of second visits

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The document held by Tameside Hospital relating to the second visit was of poor quality .In particular there was a lack of detail around the decision making.(TGH) ”

    Source location

    Margaret Ellen Postill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete evaluation or assessment sheets

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There did not appear to have been any evaluation of Mrs Postill after her return on 2nd May 2017. In particular no evaluation/assessment sheets were completed.(Home) ”

    Source location

    Margaret Ellen Postill · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce full, legible documentation expectations during twice-daily ED Board Rounds.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within the ED, a Board Round is held three times a day every day, to discuss issues and concerns with all clinicians on duty. At the Board Round his overseen by a Senior ED Consultant. It is reiterated during Board Round that it is the expectation of the Trust and the Senior Consultants in charge of the ED that documentation must be completed in full and to a legible standard. This message is regularly reinforced so that clinicians are fully aware of their expectations.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Address documentation non-compliance through senior discussions and reflective learning recorded in clinicians’ Personal Development Plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Where it is identified that clinicians are not complying with the expected standards in terms of documentation, a formal discussion with a Senior ED Consultant or the Clinical Lead for the ED will take place, at which time the expectations are again reiterated in respect to full and clear documentation. Reflective development of this nature is included within that clinician’s Personal Development Plan in order to ensure that they have appropriately reflected upon their mistakes in order to demonstrate learning has been undertaken to avoid future reoccurrence. ED documentation is also randomly audited to ensure compliance with the Trust expectations. Where issues are identified these will be picked up and dealt with as per the above mentioned process.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Randomly audit ED documentation and address identified issues through the compliance process.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Where it is identified that clinicians are not complying with the expected standards in terms of documentation, a formal discussion with a Senior ED Consultant or the Clinical Lead for the ED will take place, at which time the expectations are again reiterated in respect to full and clear documentation. Reflective development of this nature is included within that clinician’s Personal Development Plan in order to ensure that they have appropriately reflected upon their mistakes in order to demonstrate learning has been undertaken to avoid future reoccurrence. ED documentation is also randomly audited to ensure compliance with the Trust expectations. Where issues are identified these will be picked up and dealt with as per the above mentioned process.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate documentation requirements through new-clinician induction, Grand Rounds, training sessions and clinical meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All new clinicians who join the Trust receive detailed information regarding Trust Policy and Protocol, including information regarding the expectations in respect of documentation. Documentation is an issue that is also often picked up at both the Grand Round for clinicians and at Trust training sessions/clinical meetings to ensure that the message is reinforced not only in the ED Department but on a Trust wide basis.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a fully electronic ED documentation system to replace handwritten clinical notes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As advised at the inquest by the Trust’s Legal Services Manager, the Trust is to implement a fully electronic documentation system within the ED at the end of November. This system will replace handwritten documentation, which will ensure that issues regarding illegibility of handwriting are eliminated, as all clinicians within the ED will be required to type their clinical notes in to the system, thereby making it easier for subsequent clinicians involved with the care to review the notes and manage the patient accordingly.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Apply the falls prevention and post-fall protocol, including prompt assessment, incident recording, investigation and review of care plans and risk assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Post Fall Protocol”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase Area Director and Quality Regulation Manager scrutiny of falls assessments and evaluations during visits and inspections.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Scrutiny at area level by the Area Directors (AD) has been increased in terms of the quality of the completion of assessment and evaluation through the review of falls as part of their monthly home visit and the Quality Regulation Managers (QRM) on their internal inspection visits.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share sample falls risk assessments with staff to clarify assessment and post-fall evaluation requirements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The AD attended the home on the 24 October 2017 to share the findings from the case with the team at the home and the following actions were agreed:”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold daily flash meetings to discuss incidents and verify completion of follow-up actions, including referrals and risk-assessment updates.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The daily flash meeting is undertaken 7 days per week and any accidents or incidents are discussed with the team. The Home Manager/ Deputy Home Manager records this and checks any additional actions are completed, including referral to the GP and to”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish an internal falls team to review and update risk assessments, with three-monthly audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “update the falls risk assessment, which is completed by the senior care staff. The falls risk assessments are reviewed and updated by the home's internal falls team, which comprises all the Heads of Department in the home and are subject to audit every three months. This team was set up in the home after the incident and has been effective in pulling staff together to improve knowledge, accountability and ultimately outcomes for Residents through increased awareness, diligence and good record keeping.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement 24-hour post-incident observation records and senior clinical walk-rounds, with operational and internal inspection audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Each accident/incident record has a 24 hour observation record and an additional clinical walk round, which is undertaken by the Deputy / Home Manager to review Residents who are unwell, have fallen, have a peg or catheter etc. to make sure their care needs are effectively met on a daily basis. This is then fed back to the team at the flash meeting where any concerns are identified. This has now been implemented to ensure that the person is checked by a senior person following a fall and this process is audited by the operational team and the internal inspection team.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 8 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    There is no cultural acceptance of poor Emergency Department documentation; senior clinicians reinforce standards and address non-compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the inquest hearing, I understand that submissions were sought from the Trust Legal Services Manager as to the electronic system that was to be introduced within the ED department, but information regarding the ‘culture’ of poor documentation was not considered. At the time submissions were requested, it was not possible for the Trust’s Legal Services Manager to proficiently address you on matters with respect to ‘culture’ without first obtaining some further information and clarification to assist. We would assert that the Trust is aware of the importance of good record keeping and to aid and assist this is implementing the electronic data capture system in recognition of this.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing documentation standards, audits, corrective processes and electronic documentation address the concerns, making a Regulation 28 report unnecessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Where it is identified that clinicians are not complying with the expected standards in terms of documentation, a formal discussion with a Senior ED Consultant or the Clinical Lead for the ED will take place, at which time the expectations are again reiterated in respect to full and clear documentation. Reflective development of this nature is included within that clinician’s Personal Development Plan in order to ensure that they have appropriately reflected upon their mistakes in order to demonstrate learning has been undertaken to avoid future reoccurrence. ED documentation is also randomly audited to ensure compliance with the Trust expectations. Where issues are identified these will be picked up and dealt with as per the above mentioned process.”

    Source location

    2017-0382-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 February 2018

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Lindsey Theresa Hassall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lindsey Theresa Hassall had a history of substance abuse and had sought support from drug and alcohol, mental health and primary care services before her death. After being seen on a bridge, attempting to harm herself and attending a s.136 suite, she was discharged without a referral to relevant mental health services; later information about her contacts was not consistently recorded or accessible. Her body was found on 11 November 2016 suspended by a ligature, and the inquest concluded that she died from suspension from a ligature while under the influence of alcohol and drugs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to enter engagement notes into the electronic system contemporaneously

    Wider context from the report

    “• Lifeline now known as CGL had dealt with the deceased in the period leading up to her death. The notes relating to that engagement were not input into the electronic system at the time. The inquest was told that the electronic system was updated from the notes after her death. Contemporaneous notes were then destroyed by the worker on the advice of her manager. (Lifeline/CGL) ”

    Source location

    Lindsey Theresa Hassall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concerns about Lifeline/CGL’s records are not a Pennine Care issue, so no further action will be taken.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lifeline, now known as CGL, had dealt with the deceased in the period leading up to her death. The notes relating to that engagement were not input onto the electronic system at the time. The inquest was told that the electronic system was updated from the notes after her death. Contemporaneous notes were then destroyed by the worker on the advice of her manager.”

    Source location

    2017-0429-Responses
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 February 2018

    Open published response
  5. Portsmouth and South East Hampshire

    AI-generated summary

    Rafe Robbie Angelo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rafe Robbie Angelo was born at 17:30 on 23 September 2014 after his mother was transferred from the Blake Birthing Centre to hospital during labour. He was born pale and floppy, without breathing or a heart rate, and died after 37 minutes of resuscitation. The principal concerns included delays in recognising the need for urgent delivery and communication failures between the birthing centre, ambulance service and hospital, including failure to request a time-critical transfer and a non-urgent ambulance stop.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record requests for transfer to hospital in clinical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “Although it was found that the notes in this case were very good, nevertheless there was a finding that the mother had made several requests to go to hospital mainly for pain relief during the course of the morning and early afternoon yet none of these requests were recorded in the notes or acknowledged by the midwife. In this case, it was agreed by several witnesses including ████████ that if an earlier transfer had happened this would have led to CTG monitoring and picking up the earlier decelerations. ”

    Source location

    Rafe Robbie Angelo · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Shaun Mark BERRYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shaun Mark Berryman was found dead at his home address. The medical cause of death was recorded as morphine toxicity and acute bronchopneumonia, with the inquest conclusion recorded as drug-related. Concerns included a clinical assessment for a chest infection being conducted in a waiting area rather than a consultation room, no chest examination being performed, and no clinical record being made.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make clinical records

    Wider context from the report

    “In evidence it was established that Mr. Berryman was assessed by ████████ at Wells Road Surgery on 28.4.17 in respect of a chest infection but 1. The clinical assessment took place in the waiting area, not a consultation room; 2. No examination of the chest was performed; 3. No clinical record was made. ”

    Source location

    Shaun Mark BERRYMAN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add walk-in patients to the on-call triage list and obtain the on-call doctor’s advice, creating a prompt to document relevant information.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Secondly regarding writing in his clinical records; any ‘walk-in’ patients are now added to the on-call triage list by reception staff in anticipation of a potential assessment by the doctor, whilst the receptionist speaks to the on-call doctor to find out what their advice is. By adding their details to the on-call triage list, there is a visual reminder for both the doctor and receptionist to write any relevant information into the patient records. I want to re-iterate that my failure to write in Mr Berryman’s records was not a general sign of poor organisational skills, rather the lack of a visual reminder on the on-call triage list meant my usual back-up review at the end of the on-call shift did not work on this occasion.”

    Source location

    2017-0424-Response
    Page 5 · response
    Published 27 February 2018

    Open published response
  7. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Rose Ball · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rose Ball, aged 82, was admitted to hospital in the early hours of 8 December 2016 and died later that day following acute peritonitis from a perforated duodenum. The report raised concerns that GP consultations on 6 and 7 December were conducted by telephone but were not recorded as such, that an abdominal examination was recorded although it did not take place, and that there was a wider pattern of diagnosing conditions by telephone without safety-netting or plans for examination.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure clinical records reflect examinations actually performed

    Wider context from the report

    “1. ████████ failed to record that the consultations of 6 and 7 December were by telephone – and in fact recorded an abdominal examination that never took place. 2. I was troubled by ████████ evidence in court that he considered his only failing was in relation to record-keeping. 3. It is clear that ████████ conduct goes well beyond poor record-keeping. I have referred to a pattern of diagnoses by telephone by this practice. I hold records from January 2015 onwards only. It is possible that this pattern may be repeated earlier in this patient’s records – or perhaps in the records of other patients. 4. I invite you to consider the fitness to practice of ████████, in view of the findings of this inquest. 5. I strongly urge the recipients of this report to listen to the recording of this inquest. This can be supplied electronically (via Cryptshare) or on a CD. The fact that a Regulation 28 report has been issued to the GMC should not be interpreted as a criticism of that organisation. This point has been made clearly in the case of R (Dr Siddiqui and Dr Paeprer-Rohricht) v Assistant Coroner for East London. I have raised my concerns using Regulation 28 of the Coroners Investigations Regulations 2013 in view of the serious nature of the concerns I have, and in view of the fact that previous NHS investigations have already taken place and not brought the telephone consultation point to light. I consider this a matter of concern for wider public safety. For the avoidance of doubt, whilst I would welcome replies from NHS England and the CQC to the issues I have raised, a formal response to this report is required only from the GMC. ”

    Source location

    Rose Ball · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record that consultations were by telephone

    Wider context from the report

    “1. ████████ failed to record that the consultations of 6 and 7 December were by telephone – and in fact recorded an abdominal examination that never took place. 2. I was troubled by ████████ evidence in court that he considered his only failing was in relation to record-keeping. 3. It is clear that ████████ conduct goes well beyond poor record-keeping. I have referred to a pattern of diagnoses by telephone by this practice. I hold records from January 2015 onwards only. It is possible that this pattern may be repeated earlier in this patient’s records – or perhaps in the records of other patients. 4. I invite you to consider the fitness to practice of ████████, in view of the findings of this inquest. 5. I strongly urge the recipients of this report to listen to the recording of this inquest. This can be supplied electronically (via Cryptshare) or on a CD. The fact that a Regulation 28 report has been issued to the GMC should not be interpreted as a criticism of that organisation. This point has been made clearly in the case of R (Dr Siddiqui and Dr Paeprer-Rohricht) v Assistant Coroner for East London. I have raised my concerns using Regulation 28 of the Coroners Investigations Regulations 2013 in view of the serious nature of the concerns I have, and in view of the fact that previous NHS investigations have already taken place and not brought the telephone consultation point to light. I consider this a matter of concern for wider public safety. For the avoidance of doubt, whilst I would welcome replies from NHS England and the CQC to the issues I have raised, a formal response to this report is required only from the GMC. ”

    Source location

    Rose Ball · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    BRIAN STANNARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Brian Stannard was a resident at Eversley Nursing Home and was found drowned on a beach at Great Yarmouth on 14 November 2016 after being seen asleep in his room earlier that morning. The report raised concerns about the nursing home’s capacity to manage his mental ill health and threats of self-harm or suicide, as well as incomplete staff records and limited use of the Lorenzo computer system.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Workload-related delays in staff record completion

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Due to volume of work, some staff may be completing their records in their own time. ”

    Source location

    BRIAN STANNARD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Improve health-record completion through an organisation-wide programme with active monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report confirmed the findings of the RCA report that aspects of Mr Stannard’s health record had not been maintained to the expected standard, notably risk assessment and care plans. The Trust are engaged in a program to improve its performance in this area with active monitoring at all levels of the organisation. The Trust recognises there are many influencing factors affecting this and are working with clinical teams to ensure they have the right number of staff and equipment to ensure work can be allocated in a consistent and balanced way.”

    Source location

    2017-0394-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with clinical teams to provide sufficient staffing and equipment for consistent, balanced work allocation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your report confirmed the findings of the RCA report that aspects of Mr Stannard’s health record had not been maintained to the expected standard, notably risk assessment and care plans. The Trust are engaged in a program to improve its performance in this area with active monitoring at all levels of the organisation. The Trust recognises there are many influencing factors affecting this and are working with clinical teams to ensure they have the right number of staff and equipment to ensure work can be allocated in a consistent and balanced way.”

    Source location

    2017-0394-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 February 2018

    Open published response
  9. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Edward Giles · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Edward Giles became unwell, was admitted to hospital, underwent a diagnostic surgical procedure, then deteriorated and died. The report identified concerns about inconsistent shift handovers, lack of senior review at weekends, inadequate clinical and nursing leadership during a crisis, and inadequate case notes and medical records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate case notes and medical records

    Wider context from the report

    “4 The case notes and medical records were (again) inadequate. I have been told on many occasions that the importance of good record-keeping is emphasised to clinicians - sadly in this case yet again the lessons do not appear to be being learned. ”

    Source location

    Michael Edward Giles · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete an audit establishing baseline clinical record-keeping performance and assessing improvement interventions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise the importance of good clinical record note keeping. As part of this, we have undertaken an audit to assess our baseline and thereby assess the impact of interventions to improve this. I have attached the audit which demonstrates areas of good practice as well as areas in need of improvement. We’re also working with the communications team to develop a clinical records keeping video to drive up standards. I anticipate that this will be available in February. I’ve also attached a leaflet that will be forwarded to all in the Trust that utilise patient’s notes. The attached has yet to be finalised and is merely to provide an indication of the direction of travel. I anticipate that this will be available in February 2018.”

    Source location

    2017-0309-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a clinical record-keeping video with the communications team to improve documentation standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise the importance of good clinical record note keeping. As part of this, we have undertaken an audit to assess our baseline and thereby assess the impact of interventions to improve this. I have attached the audit which demonstrates areas of good practice as well as areas in need of improvement. We’re also working with the communications team to develop a clinical records keeping video to drive up standards. I anticipate that this will be available in February. I’ve also attached a leaflet that will be forwarded to all in the Trust that utilise patient’s notes. The attached has yet to be finalised and is merely to provide an indication of the direction of travel. I anticipate that this will be available in February 2018.”

    Source location

    2017-0309-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalize and distribute a clinical record-keeping leaflet to Trust staff who use patient notes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise the importance of good clinical record note keeping. As part of this, we have undertaken an audit to assess our baseline and thereby assess the impact of interventions to improve this. I have attached the audit which demonstrates areas of good practice as well as areas in need of improvement. We’re also working with the communications team to develop a clinical records keeping video to drive up standards. I anticipate that this will be available in February. I’ve also attached a leaflet that will be forwarded to all in the Trust that utilise patient’s notes. The attached has yet to be finalised and is merely to provide an indication of the direction of travel. I anticipate that this will be available in February 2018.”

    Source location

    2017-0309-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 November 2017

    Open published response
  10. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Carol Buchanan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carol Buchanan was admitted to hospital after a fall and later deteriorated following the combined prescription of Itraconazole and Simvastatin, which led to rhabdomyolysis and muscle necrosis. She died on 26 May 2017 despite treatment. Concerns included inadequate prescription record checking and documentation, failure to recognise the serious drug interaction, missed opportunities to act on relevant history, and delays in monitoring and diagnosis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record prescriptions in relevant records in a timely effective manner

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The prescription of Itraconazole on the 27th April 2017 was not typed up into relevant records either by way of a “GP clinic letter” or by way of a timely effective prescription. ”

    Source location

    Carol Buchanan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out the Electronic Patient Record and Electronic Prescribing to enable clinicians to access current prescribed medication in outpatient clinics.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is currently working on the roll out of the Electronic Patient Record (EPR) and Electronic Prescribing. Whilst it is not fully operational yet, it is complete clinicians working in out-patient clinics are able to access current prescribed medication.”

    Source location

    2017-0294-Response-by-Bolton-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026