Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Mnayea ZMF Al Basman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mnayea ZMF Al Basman, who had significant co-morbidities, underwent a right hemicolectomy for caecal adenocarcinoma and died in hospital on 25 March 2024 after developing sepsis and peritonitis caused by an anastomotic leak. Concerns included failure to escalate aspects of his deterioration to the consultant surgeon, insufficient professional curiosity, inadequate overnight observation planning, and a lack of detail in some records. The report also noted that the events preceding his death had not been subject to an internal investigation, providing little reassurance that these matters had been addressed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of clinical records to provide sufficiently detailed and accurate information

    Wider context from the report

    “1) The consultant colorectal surgeon was not in the hospital over the weekend of 23/24 March 2024; however, he was able to be contacted if the need arose. The consultant surgeon noted the following matters in relation to the care provided to Mr Al Basman over that weekend: • a further CT scan could have been indicated, particularly given issues with Mr Al Basman’s drain, albeit there was nothing to indicate that any scan was needed on an urgent basis; • some entries in the clinical notes may have been ‘falsely reassuring’; • the physiotherapist who saw Mr Al Basman on the morning of 24 March 2024, noted that he appeared to be ‘declining’ but there was no evidence that this was escalated this to someone within the healthcare team; • there was a degree of insufficient professional curiosity on the part of some clinicians who saw Mr Al Basman; and • there should have been a plan in place to closely observe Mr Al Basman overnight on 24/25 March 2024. 2) Based on the above, the consultant surgeon formed the view that Mr Al Basman’s clinical presentation should have led to the consultant being informed and consulted, but it did not. 3) A number of the notes/records in relation to the care provided to Mr Al Basman, particularly over the weekend of 23/24 March 2024, lacked detail. Given that the events preceding Mr Al Basman’s death have not been the subject of an internal investigation, I received little, if any, reassurance that these matters have been addressed. ”

    Source location

    Mnayea ZMF Al Basman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Elton Deutekom · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elton suffered acute hypoxic-ischaemic injury following a placental abruption during labour and was delivered by forceps at 04:35 on 12 January 2022; despite resuscitation, he was recognised as life extinct at 05:12. The report identifies failures to recognise and respond to abnormal CTG changes, and raises wider concerns about neonatal death referrals, disclosure of evidence, record-keeping, staffing, supervision and CTG monitoring.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Destruction of contemporaneous handwritten notes following neonatal deaths

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That following neonatal deaths assistance is given to midwifery staff as to how to write records in retrospect and contemporaneous handwritten notes are destroyed possibly reducing the accuracy of the records and thus risking that lessons may not be learned that may save the lives of others. ”

    Source location

    Elton Deutekom · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Raymond Albert Alfred Reid · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Raymond Albert Alfred Reid was admitted to hospital with a catheter-related urinary tract infection, developed pressure sores and pneumonia during a prolonged stay, and died on 1 March 2023. The report identified concerns about gaps in pressure sore prevention, monitoring, documentation, nutritional screening, repositioning, wound follow-up and photography.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to routinely document skin checks

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The pressure sores developed in hospital and the deterioration of the pressure sores was possibly caused by gaps in care and knowledge. More particularly the evidence at the inquest (and the findings of an internal concise investigation) revealed that: a. A first skin check was not completed within 6 hours of admission in accordance with Trust policy. b. The pressure ulcer risk assessment was not completed within 6 hours of admission and was not repeated daily in accordance with Trust policy. c. Skin checks were not routinely documented – there were 21 intermittent days when a skin check was not recorded. d. A malnutrition universal screening tool assessment was not completed in accordance with Trust policy. e. There were long periods when Mr Reid was not moved – there were episodes during 15/2/23 to 21/2/23 when Mr Reid was not documented to have been moved for 5-10 hours. This is not best practice. f. Following a Tissue Viability Team assessment there was no follow up planned – this should have been planned to monitor wound progression. g. No photographs were taken between 8/2/23 and 21/2/23. The taking of photographs represents best practice to enable the progress and/or deterioration of a wound to be fully understood. ”

    Source location

    Raymond Albert Alfred Reid · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review reported tissue-damage incidents, take immediate local learning actions, and assess implications for the Trust-wide improvement plan.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From this, you can see that there is a huge amount of work covered by the Group. All Care Groups attend the quarterly meeting and it is jointly led by the two Trust Tissue Viability Leads. All reported incidents of tissue damage are reviewed by the TV team in collaboration with the Care Group Senior Nurses. Immediate local learning/actions will be taken following this initial review. All incidents will also be reviewed to determine any implications for the Trust wide TV improvement plan. Trends and discrepancies in care can be identified centrally and early work can then be done to improve patient care.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Devon Healthcare NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a Northern-site leadership workstream to strengthen front-line nursing practice in pressure-ulcer prevention and management, with senior oversight of delivery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to ensure that this is actually being delivered on the front line, the Chief Nursing Officer has commissioned a significant leadership piece of work from the Director of Nursing on the Northern site. She has been asked to ensure we have right systems and processes for care in Northern services and specifically looking to “foster leadership in best practice in front line nursing staff who have ward based responsibilities regarding the day to day prevention and management of pressure ulcers”. This Group is being set up and delivery against the agreed actions will be report to the Tissue Viability Group and the Patient Safety Committee so again there will be high level and senior oversight of this piece of work.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Devon Healthcare NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing Trust-wide pressure damage prevention arrangements provide sufficient assurance that further work and dissemination are not required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am pleased to be able to write and provide you with real assurance that the Trust is doing significant work to reduce pressure damage in patients and I hope you will be reassured that this has been a priority of the Trust for some time now and substantial work is being done to ensure improvements.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Devon Healthcare NHS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 March 2025

    Open published response
  4. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Emma Victoria Sanders · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emma Victoria Sanders died on 19 March 2023 after being found unresponsive in a hospital toilet with a ligature fashioned from nasal cannula tubing around her neck. The report raised concerns about delays in accessing hospital records and care plans, particularly when patients are placed in cohorting areas, and about the absence of care-plan information from Summary Care Records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of care plans in Summary Care Records

    Wider context from the report

    “ii. The Summary Care Record does not detail care plans in place for individuals in Dorset, the wider South West region and may be nationally. Lack of access to these plans could impact on patient care and lead to a future death. ”

    Source location

    Emma Victoria Sanders · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Summary Care Record cannot include the full detail of a patient’s care plan because its design and format do not support it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SCR is not intended to include the full detail of a patient’s care plan, and the design / format of the SCR does not support this. However, the SCR can include a signpost to the existence of a care plan by using a relevant code for the following, or otherwise a free-text entry:”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Registered GP practices must enter care-plan information into the Summary Care Record using an appropriate clinical code.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SCR content is only authored from the patient’s registered GP Practice. For information about the existence of a care plan to be shared in this way, the patient’s GP Practice needs to be made aware of the care plan and then enter this information using an appropriate specific clinical code.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Uploading patient records into the national summary care record is outside NHS Dorset’s control, preventing it from addressing that issue.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. As per Paragraph 2 (ii) of your report outlining your concerns, a review has taken place on the process of identification of patients with High Intensity Care Plans. The uploading of patient records into the national summary care record remains an issue and is out of the control of NHS Dorset. However, we will enforce the use of the Dorset Care Record in line with our contractual commitments in 2025/2026 and onwards.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Dorset
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2024

    Open published response
  5. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Jamie Harding · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jamie Harding attended Basildon Hospital on 3 June 2022 in crisis, with worsening psychotic symptoms, suicidal ideation and several days without sleep. He was discharged home rather than admitted as an inpatient and took his own life within hours after falling from a window. The substantive concerns included failures in assessment, follow-up, medication review, multidisciplinary working, risk assessment, record keeping and communication, alongside weaknesses in systems supporting the First Response Team and access to the Dual Diagnosis pathway.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Weak record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “(a) The accepted absence of effective formal, compulsory training for clinicians regarding the Dual Diagnosis (DD) pathway and what it does and does not provide, how to access it and the potential benefits of it. The evidence confirmed that practitioners outside of the DD workers/pathway were unaware how they could contact them, including directly. (b) In addition to weak record keeping and poor communication with patients and their families, the evidence revealed the lack of a robust and reliable system to ensure that the FRT deals with its caseload efficiently and effectively and that particularity when it flags and then follows up referrals to and queries from other services/clinicians contributing, in turn and on the facts of this case, to the significant failure to hold an MDT. The FRT did not follow up (as it was accepted it should have) the referral (via a self-referral) to Open Road or the referrals for a medication review. Had there been such follow up, EPUT evidence confirmed that there would likely have been a discussion of Jamie’s case at a full MDT with the likely allocation of a Care Coordinator, the likely involvement of the Dual Diagnosis pathway and the likely use of the RAG rating system to ensure on-going risk assessment. In my opinion these features give rise to a clear risk of future deaths and must be addressed. ”

    Source location

    Jamie Harding · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the MaST caseload-management tool with electronic risk, disengagement and RAG indicators supporting MDT prioritisation, and monitor its use through regular audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has implemented the Management and Supervision Tool (MaST) caseload management tool, which is improving how our care coordinators (and their supervisors) electronically manage their caseloads.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 November 2024

    Open published response
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Kashim ALI · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Kashim Ali was detained under section 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983 at Mile End Hospital and died on 21 May 2024 after being found unresponsive in bed; attempts at resuscitation were unsuccessful. The concerns identified included failures to escalate NEWS2 scores, shortcomings in one-to-one observation practices, and inaccurate observation records, which were considered to create risks to patient safety and future patients.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate record-keeping of patient observations

    Wider context from the report

    “3) The Trust noted, during its own serious incident investigation, that the quality of record keeping in relation to Mr Ali’s observations was not always accurate. Given the key role that accurate record-keeping plays in patient care within any healthcare setting, I formed the view that this also creates significant risk. ”

    Source location

    Kashim ALI · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce an e-observations system linking observation care plans to records, time-stamping entries, and requiring documentation of observation-level changes and escalation decisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “17. As the Trust PSII set out, work is progressing on introducing an e-observations system which will prompt staff to enter both their observations and engagement with the patient (rather than just the location of the patient), and this will be time-stamped. On the app each patient’s observation care plan will be linked to their record of observation. This ensures continuity of care. Any reviews in level of observations will require an entry to be made verifying the escalation and decision making process.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 1 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend daily ward spot-check audits to review observation records, documentation timeliness, completeness, accuracy, and actions taken in response to patient deterioration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “18. In response to the concerns raised, the Directorate has amended the daily spot check audit process on all wards, including Millharbour Ward, to ensure that the quality of patient records is closely monitored. The daily spot check now specifically includes a detailed review of the records kept during patient observations, including physical health observations and any clinical actions taken in response to changes in a patient’s condition. This enhancement to the audit process is designed to ensure that any gaps or inaccuracies in record-keeping are identified early and addressed promptly.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 1 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce the updated Observations and Therapeutic Engagement Policy, including documentation standards, missed-observation procedures, improvement ideas, and Honesty in Documentation training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Updated Observations and Therapeutic Engagement Policy”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 1 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue reinforcing record-keeping standards through regular audits, continuous training, and checks of timely, accurate, and complete documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “22. The Trust recognises that accurate record-keeping is not only crucial for the continuity of care but also for accountability and auditing purposes. As such, the Trust is committed to reinforcing these standards through regular audits, continuous training, and a robust system of checks to ensure that patient records are always completed in a timely, accurate, and thorough manner.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 1 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue reviewing and enhancing record-keeping and auditing processes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “23. The Trust will continue to review and enhance its processes for record-keeping and auditing as part of our ongoing commitment to improving the quality of care we provide. By ensuring that all documentation is accurate and up to date, we can better support clinical decision-making, improve patient outcomes, and ensure that our practices remain aligned with the highest standards of care.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 1 November 2024

    Open published response
  7. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Chloe Every · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Chloe Every died in hospital on 14 May 2019 after complications from a hypoxic cardiac arrest sustained during her admission. The report identified concerns including morphine use without recorded justification, an enema undertaken without informed consent while she was unconscious, inadequate clinical observations, missing records, and failures in incident reporting and governance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain contemporary nursing and medical records of treatment and treatment decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The investigation of this inquest was prejudiced by the absence of contemporary nursing and medical notes from various stages of Chloe's treatment. The extent of these lapses meant staff who made important treatment decisions could not be identified, and where staff could be identified, no contemporary account of their rationale for making treatment decisions could be located. ”

    Source location

    Chloe Every · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a full Electronic Patient Care Record to integrate clinical records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust currently remains on part electronic and paper records. However, there has been significant progress towards a more integrated system. The Trust is in the planning stages of implementation of a full Electronic Patient Care Record (EPR) with the planned date for implementation of June 2025. Implementation is supported by a team of clinical and digital staff, with progress monitored through the Trust Executive Committee and the Trust Board.”

    Source location

    Response from Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Good Medical Record Keeping training through Legal Services and junior doctors’ emergency department induction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a practical response to this concern, the Trust’s Legal Services Department now routinely deliver training sessions on “The importance of Good Record Keeping”. The training puts particular focus on the importance of good medical documentation being a fundamental aspect of clinicians’ duty in providing patient care; ensuring patient’s needs are met; ensuring continuity of care; ensuring effective evidence of the standard of care and decision-making process.”

    Source location

    Response from Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish and operate a Quarterly Health Records Group to review best practice, learning opportunities and resulting action plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In August 2024, the Medical Directorate established a Quarterly Health Records Group where both best practice and learning opportunities will be presented and reviewed with action plans as appropriate.”

    Source location

    Response from Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake paper-based CRABEL medical-record audits across specialties and share results Trust-wide.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust lead for mortality and Caldicott Guardian is in the process of organising CRABEL audits (an audit tool designed by Crawford – Bresford – Lafferty) as a tool for the assessment of the quality of medical record keeping, with the ability to standardise audit and improvement across areas. A paper-based CRABEL audit is being undertaken within different specialties and results will be shared trust wide.”

    Source location

    Response from Barking, Havering and Redbridge NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    BHRUT is responsible for responding fully to the concerns, so the Department will not duplicate its response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHSE have informed us that BHRUT is preparing a response to address your concerns in full. This is entirely appropriate due to the nature of the concerns raised and as a direct recipient of this report. I look forward to their response with interest and do not wish to duplicate it. However, I will highlight some points from the information shared with us, of the actions taken to improve matters in relation to the care of patients with learning disabilities since Chloe’s death in 2019:”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 1 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response
  8. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Mia Louise Gauci-Lamport · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mia Louise Gauci-Lamport, who had treatment-resistant epilepsy and required full-time residential care, was found cyanotic and unresponsive at around 06.32 hours on 11 September 2023 after not being visually checked when a carer entered her room. Resuscitation was unsuccessful. The report raised concerns about inadequate night-time monitoring, incomplete medical records and insufficient clinical oversight and governance.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain comprehensive, understandable, accurate and contemporaneous medical records

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Medical Care provided to Mia Mia’s medical records at TCT were neither comprehensive nor easy to understand and did not conform to the expected standard in NHS general or hospital practice to ensure accurate and contemporaneous medical care was being reviewed and documented. Mia was a ‘looked after’ child with complex and challenging health needs and could not contribute or make decisions for herself. The independent investigator found regular PEWS (Paediatric Early Warning Scores) assessments were not undertaken to ensure Mia’s well-being despite it being within her care plan. There was no documented evidence that a multidisciplinary clinical review was regularly, if at all, undertaken to ensure Mia’s risk was regularly assessed, appropriate monitoring was in place, and care provision was meeting her needs. Mia was reviewed by a ‘privately-funded’ consultant employed by but working independently of Great Ormond Street Children’s Hospital as and when requested by the medical staff at TCT. The consultant had no terms of reference and did not take responsibility for Mia’s ongoing care and was consulted only in relation to adjustments in her medication for seizure control. Due to financial constraints the consultant’s service level agreement was temporarily terminated and not available from April to October 2023. In this context, Mia was not under a specialist NHS paediatric neuro-consultant to ensure her ongoing medical needs conformed to expected practice nationally and for an independent consultant outside of TCT to have regular oversight and co-ordinate investigations and any further multi-disciplinary management she may need given this progressive life-limiting condition. ”

    Source location

    Mia Louise Gauci-Lamport · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit medical records regularly against NHS standards and address ongoing health-record integration issues with system partners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “○ Medical records: We continually audit our medical records in line with NHS standards and achieve high compliance against these. As an organisation sitting outside the NHS, health record integration is complex and an ongoing area of focus for us with our wider health and social care system partners. Medical record audits continue regularly to ensure our ongoing compliance in this area.”

    Source location

    Response from The Children's Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake a comprehensive inspection of the service, including assessment of overnight observations, care planning, clinical monitoring and governance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In December 2023 CQC had received key information and started to plan for an inspection in February. On February 20th to 21st 2024 the CQC undertook a comprehensive inspection of TCT as part of our regulatory response to the notification of Mia’s sad death. The inspection looked at all five key questions of whether TCT is Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. (Please see attached PDF). CQC do not provide ratings for children’s homes that are registered with Ofsted, as per our policy.”

    Source location

    Response from CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Local Authority, not NHS England, is responsible for overseeing the quality of the residential care service because it commissioned the bed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mia was in a residential care bed, which is commissioned instead by the Local Authority. The commissioning body, in this case the LA, has the responsibility for oversight of the quality of the service. NHSE have provided assurance that their regional team has been working with system and other partners on responding to risks and concerns in a joint approach at this provider, which will be set out in their response. In case of interest, NHSE’s guidance on specialised services can be found here: NHS commissioning » Specialised services.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 October 2024

    Open published response
  9. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    James Warren Agius · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Warren Agius was found deceased at home on 17 December 2022 after suspending himself, with the inquest concluding suicide by suspension by ligature. The concerns included significant omissions in his medical records, an incomplete risk assessment following a suicide attempt, differing views about whether he displayed hypomanic symptoms, and no evidence that new national risk-assessment training had been implemented by the Trust.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Significant omissions in medical record documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The medical record documentation for Mr Agius had significant omissions that included an incomplete risk assessment in February 2022 for Mr Agius following his transfer following crisis intervention with the Home Treat Team to avoid an admission to hospital when Mr Agius attempted to take his own life. ”

    Source location

    James Warren Agius · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a thematic review of patient-safety incidents and establish Trust-wide workstreams to address identified record-keeping gaps and embed learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has completed a thematic review of patient safety incidents with the intention of identifying themes and patterns occurring within these. Resulting from this was the establishment of Trust wide workstreams aimed to address the identified gaps and then embed learning around these across the Trust. Of pertinence to the concerns raised in this instance, is the Improving Quality of Record Keeping and Clinical Documentation workstream.”

    Source location

    Response from NELFT
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide all staff with an intranet resource containing record-keeping guidance, escalation information, and quick access to related documentation standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The aim of this workstream is to establish any system weaknesses associated with poor record keeping, understand the behaviour associated with this and to improve recording keeping and create a healthy record keeping culture. The Quality Improvement initiatives around this workstream have so far been successful in creating a Trust wide intranet page accessible to all staff offering direction on the importance of accurate and good record keeping. In addition to this, the Trust has developed quick access to guidance and information on issues such as cut and paste and commonly used acronyms and clinical abbreviations. Readily accessible links to good record keeping practice are also available and consequences of failing to comply with this and guidance on how to escalate concerns are also captured and available to all staff within this platform.”

    Source location

    Response from NELFT
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Put revised good-record-keeping training packages into induction for all staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Revised training packages have also been put in place that cover the principles of good record keeping standards. These are essential training for all staff and are covered as part of the induction to NELFT.”

    Source location

    Response from NELFT
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require Home Treatment Team staff to use an agreed home-visit documentation template covering mental state, physical health, safeguarding, risk assessment, and follow-up planning, with fortnightly audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support good record keeping practice in the Home Treatment Teams (HTT) in NELFT, all staff completing home visits to service users are expected to complete their records utilising an agreed template. This ensures that the visit and documentation of what took place will cover areas including (though not limited to), mental state examination, social situation, physical health concerns, risk assessment, safeguarding and that these lead to a clear plan to be followed by the team. Adherence to this is monitored within through a fortnightly progress note audit that is completed. The last audit that was completed for the Barking and Dagenham HTT was on 3rd November 2024, with the team scoring 100% for adherence to use of the correct template. All entries reviewed also included a full Mental State Examination and risk assessment.”

    Source location

    Response from NELFT
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 October 2024

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    John Turner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Turner died at Tameside General Hospital on 23 August 2023 from a pulmonary embolism due to a deep vein thrombosis, neither of which had been identified when he attended the Emergency Department three days earlier. The concerns included significant deviation from the Manchester Triage System, a requested D-Dimer test not being undertaken, delayed recording of a senior doctor’s findings, and reduced scope to identify atypical major or life-threatening illness during periods of unremitting demand.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in recording senior clinical findings in the electronic patient record

    Wider context from the report

    “In the present case, the court heard evidence as to significant deviation (which can particularly occur at times of high demand) from the Manchester Triage System which seeks to safely manage patient flow with reference to competing needs. In addition, it was almost 8 hours before the senior doctor who reviewed Mr Turner on 20th August 2023 recorded her findings in the electronic patient record, in all likelihood reflecting competing clinical demands on her time. In the light of the above, I am concerned, as a practical consequence of unremitting demand on this and other Emergency Departments, the scope for identifying major or life-threatening illness which presents atypically is significantly reduced. ”

    Source location

    John Turner · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026