Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Evelyn Ross · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Evelyn Ross fractured her hip, underwent surgery, and was transferred for rehabilitation. After a fall, delayed CT scanning identified an acute on chronic subdural haematoma, followed by surgery, deterioration with hospital-acquired pneumonia, and her death on 23 September 2019. Concerns included staffing shortages, delays arranging discharge care, inadequate documentation, failure to follow the falls risk policy, and a lack of clear regular orthogeriatric consultant reviews and escalation when her condition deteriorated.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain sufficiently detailed clinical documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “3. During the course of the inquest the documentation relied on by the trust was lacking in detail and meant that it was difficult to understand her condition at key points or to understand the rationale for decisions. ”

    Source location

    Evelyn Ross · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver documentation training and complete Ward 6 competency assessments, senior sign-off, and regular clinical-record audits with feedback on omissions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Training is provided to all clinical staff in respect of documentation in clinical records. As part of the mandatory induction of all staff, Trust training is provided in respect of Information Governance, which covers accurate and clear record keeping. This is also covered in the mandatory training updates which all staff are required to undertake every two years. All staff also receive a local induction in their own area of work which comprehensively covers all areas of documentation and records keeping relevant to the individual staff member’s role. The Trust retains records of all staff training undertaken Trust-wide, including mandatory training.”

    Source location

    2020-0106-Response-from-Manchester-University-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 5 · response
    Published 5 June 2020

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    ALLAN WILLIAM CUNLIFFE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Allan Cunliffe, who had bowel problems and mental health issues, became ill on Summers Ward on 17 July 2018 and died in A&E on 18 July 2018 after deterioration associated with a perforated bowel and sepsis. The substantive concerns included poor communication, inadequate recording and calculation of NEWS scores, failures to follow observation protocols, and confusion about oxygen administration, with the jury stating that insufficient record keeping and communication probably led to an avoidable death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate or lacking recording of clinical observations and NEWS scores

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust. The physical care of vulnerable patients on Summers Ward was poor. Whilst the experience of different junior doctors will inevitably vary, communication between the doctors and nurses was poor and the recording of clinical observations/ NEWS score and action thereon (designed to alleviate some of the clinical decision making) was inaccurate/ lacking. There was further confusion regarding the administration of oxygen, with at least one nurse being apparently unaware of the mandatory training. ”

    Source location

    ALLAN WILLIAM CUNLIFFE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce accurate NEWS2 completion and documentation through staff communication and regular supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following Mr Cunliffe’s passing, and the conclusion at HM Coroner’s Inquest, work has been undertaken within the Older Adult’s In-Patient Service in Tameside. A ████████ o all staff members reiterating the importance of ensuring that [redacted text]culated accurately and signed appropriately. All refusals of [redacted text]tion of concern must be documented clearly in the patient’s records. This is now discussed regularly in individual team member’s supervision. In addition to this the ward manager or physical health lead now completes a monthly audit of five randomly selected NEWS2 charts. This allows oversight and assurance ████████ standards are maintained. NEWS2 training is now provided by the modern matron on a rolling programme. This training details the history of the NEWS and the importance of completing this in full. Staff are informed that the early warning system can:”

    Source location

    2020-0099-Response-from-Pennine-Care-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit five randomly selected NEWS2 charts monthly to oversee compliance with documentation standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following Mr Cunliffe’s passing, and the conclusion at HM Coroner’s Inquest, work has been undertaken within the Older Adult’s In-Patient Service in Tameside. A ████████ o all staff members reiterating the importance of ensuring that [redacted text]culated accurately and signed appropriately. All refusals of [redacted text]tion of concern must be documented clearly in the patient’s records. This is now discussed regularly in individual team member’s supervision. In addition to this the ward manager or physical health lead now completes a monthly audit of five randomly selected NEWS2 charts. This allows oversight and assurance ████████ standards are maintained. NEWS2 training is now provided by the modern matron on a rolling programme. This training details the history of the NEWS and the importance of completing this in full. Staff are informed that the early warning system can:”

    Source location

    2020-0099-Response-from-Pennine-Care-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide rolling NEWS2 training covering accurate scoring, escalation, clinical deterioration and sepsis recognition.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following Mr Cunliffe’s passing, and the conclusion at HM Coroner’s Inquest, work has been undertaken within the Older Adult’s In-Patient Service in Tameside. A ████████ o all staff members reiterating the importance of ensuring that [redacted text]culated accurately and signed appropriately. All refusals of [redacted text]tion of concern must be documented clearly in the patient’s records. This is now discussed regularly in individual team member’s supervision. In addition to this the ward manager or physical health lead now completes a monthly audit of five randomly selected NEWS2 charts. This allows oversight and assurance ████████ standards are maintained. NEWS2 training is now provided by the modern matron on a rolling programme. This training details the history of the NEWS and the importance of completing this in full. Staff are informed that the early warning system can:”

    Source location

    2020-0099-Response-from-Pennine-Care-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 May 2020

    Open published response
  3. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    George Townsend · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    George Townsend, who was receiving long-term antibiotic therapy, developed worsening diarrhoea and was later diagnosed in hospital with Clostridium difficile infection and pneumonia. He died at Trafford General Hospital on 30 August 2019 from multi-organ failure due to bronchopneumonia. The concerns included delayed GP assessment and testing, inadequate escalation from the nurse to a doctor, failure to recognise the risks associated with his health conditions, poor medical record-keeping, and longstanding concerns about GP practice capacity and oversight.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor quality of written medical notes

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The quality of the written medical notes at the GP practice was poor. ”

    Source location

    George Townsend · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Although record keeping could have been better, the medical notes contained sufficient documentation to form a clinical view.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. The quality of the written medical notes at the GP practice was poor.”

    Source location

    2020-0157-Response-from-NHS-Trafford-Clinical-Commissioning-Group_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 22 October 2020

    Open published response
  4. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Edna May Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Edna May Davenport, a resident of Oak Court House residential care home, sustained head injuries during an unwitnessed assault by another resident and died in hospital on 12 December 2019. The report raised concerns about the removal of her alarm without documented alternative arrangements, inadequate recording and monitoring of observations, insufficient risk assessment of the other resident, and delays in responding to signs of head injury and deterioration.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record or report resident deterioration and drowsiness

    Wider context from the report

    “(7) No further checks were carried out by the home manager after this time and it appeared that evidence of the deceased becoming unwell and suffering with episodes of drowsiness were not recorded or indeed reported by staff caring for her. I am concerned that Oak Court does not have a clear policy in place to manage head injuries; ”

    Source location

    Edna May Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record the timing and findings of resident observations

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) I heard evidence that the deceased was subject to hourly observations but that these observations were not recorded as to when they actually took place or what was observed. Therefore, it was not possible to ascertain how long the other resident had been in the room with the deceased or how long the assault went on for; ”

    Source location

    Edna May Davenport · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. North East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    HARRY RICHFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Harry Richford was born at QEQM on 2 November 2017 and died at William Harvey Hospital on 9 November 2017 after being transferred there. The report describes delays in delivery, shortcomings in the caesarean delivery and neonatal resuscitation, and subsequent hypoxia and brain injury. Substantive concerns included locum recruitment, assessment and supervision; clarity about escalation to consultants; neonatal resuscitation training; record keeping and adherence to guidelines; and inaccurate death notifications and reporting.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Substandard obstetric record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 13 The standard of record keeping on the obstetric unit was substantially sub-standard. The quality of the note taking and records is of considerable importance to new staff taking over responsibility for mother and baby. Without there being clear accurate records there is a risk of further mistakes being made leading, at the worst, to the risk of death. An example of this in Harry's case is that the record of the syntocinon prescribed to ████████ over a long period of time is inconsistent with the evidence of the midwives and the registrar who gave it to her. ”

    Source location

    HARRY RICHFORD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 8 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust is responsible for setting out and implementing actions to address the identified maternity-service safety risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that the Trust Board is taking these matters very seriously and has welcomed the national support being provided. I expect the Trust to set out in its response to your report the actions it is taking to address the important safety risks you have outlined.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 October 2022

    Open published response
  6. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Billy James Jenkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Billy James Jenkins was found hanging by the neck in a hotel room bathroom on 12 August 2019, following a history of low mood, alcohol and cocaine abuse, suicidal ideation and previous suicide attempts. The concerns included limited information gathering during his mental health assessment, a decision that he did not have a mental health condition without further assessment, inadequate documentation and planning, and possible over-reliance on alcohol and drug use as the explanation for his suicidal ideation. The inquest concluded that he took his own life following an assessment after which he felt helpless because there had been no clear mental state examination and a potential missed opportunity to consider an appropriate referral.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document clinical formulation or impression

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The Community Mental Health Nurse did not document her formulation or impression. The plan moving forward was not robust and did not explore protective factors or minimisation of harm and there was an over-reliance on alcohol and drug use as the cause of his suicidal ideation. There appeared to be no proforma of questions to ask. ”

    Source location

    Billy James Jenkins · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct reflective-practice sessions focused on assessment, risk documentation, record keeping and formulation, with impact monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a result of the incident the community mental team core induction tool was sent to all CMHT managers to go through with all the new starters and other established colleagues to reinforce the expectations of their roles and the assessment process. This was shared with all staff in supervision and an email has also been sent to all members of staff. Reflective practice sessions have also been conducted focusing on documentation and record keeping, particularly assessment (needs and risk) and formulation. The impact of this is being monitored in Team meetings and in reflective practice meetings. This will be reviewed again after the current unusual working practices in relation to Covid 19.”

    Source location

    2020-0068-Response-from-Oxleas-NHS-Foundation-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 March 2020

    Open published response
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Julie Helen Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Julie Helen Taylor, who had Down syndrome and significant learning disabilities, died at Stepping Hill Hospital on 23 September 2018 from pneumonitis following a chicken pox virus infection contracted while awaiting discharge. The concerns included inadequate reasonable-adjustment planning, lack of best-interests meetings and documented decision-making, poor communication between agencies, limited access to suitable learning-disability beds and support, information-sharing difficulties, and delayed recognition of chicken pox.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incomplete digitisation preventing professionals from accessing each other's notes

    Wider context from the report

    “8. The IT constraints meant that the acute trust could not access the community trusts records. The community trust itself had not fully digitised meaning not all professionals could see each other's notes. The community trust recognised the internal issue and was taking steps to fully roll out an integrated system however communication between trusts digitally was unlikely to improve despite a recognition that it would be beneficial. ”

    Source location

    Julie Helen Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The local NHS is expected to reflect on the LeDeR findings and address local failings in care for people with learning disabilities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised by NHS England and NHS Improvement that Ms Taylor’s death is currently being reviewed under the LeDeR process and I expect the local NHS to reflect on the findings of the review and take action to address any failings in the care provided locally for people with a learning disability. I have also asked officials to bring your report to the attention of the National Director for Learning Disabilities, Ray James, who is leading work nationally to improve services for people with learning disabilities and/or autism.”

    Source location

    2019-0454-Response-from-the-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 January 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Community care matters in Derbyshire fall outside the Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership’s remit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You have also identified a number of areas regarding community care in Derbyshire. As Derbyshire does not fall under the remit of the Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership we are unable to provide a response to those issues.”

    Source location

    2019-0454-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Health-and-social-Care-Partnership-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 January 2020

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Keith HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keith Hill was admitted with biliary sepsis and underwent a liver biopsy, after which he developed bleeding requiring surgery and later suffered bowel haemorrhage. The report identified concerns about communication between specialists, inadequate medical records, and insufficient support and scrutiny around the prescription and dispensing of micafungin.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document treatment-plan changes and prescribing decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Mr Hill’s medical records were at times inadequate. The microbiologists thought that the junior hepatologists were making a record and vice versa. In the event, neither did. Most specifically, following the repeated advice of the microbiologists, the decision to change the plan and to prescribe micafungin on 25 June was not documented, it was simply written up on the prescription chart. ”

    Source location

    Keith HILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce requirements for significant clinical decisions to be documented in patient records and for clinical notes to meet best-practice standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, if the planned procedure proves impossible, or by the time the patient arrives in the IR theatre the patient has had a significant change in condition, the radiologist would contact the referring team. All significant decisions should be documented in the patient record. The importance of this has been reinforced.”

    Source location

    2019-0446-Response-from-Barts-NHS-Trust-R
    Page 1 · response
    Published 6 January 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit note keeping regularly at monthly morbidity and mortality meetings to drive and maintain improvement.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Note keeping has been reviewed by the consultant body and there has been agreement that the quality of note keeping must always meet the standards of best practice. There will be regular audits of note keeping at the monthly M&M meeting to drive and maintain improvement.”

    Source location

    2019-0446-Response-from-Barts-NHS-Trust-R
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 January 2020

    Open published response
  9. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Tomasz Nowosad · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Tomasz Nowosad was found hanging by a ligature in an ordinary, non-safe cell at HMP Manchester on 2 February 2017, shortly after being transferred from the healthcare centre. The report identifies concerns about risk assessment, including reliance on his denials of suicidal thoughts, incomplete and delayed clinical records, inconsistent use of interpretation services, and his transfer to an ordinary wing despite expressed fears and mental health risks. The inquest jury concluded that the death was suicide contributed to by neglect.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of timely, full and accurate clinical record keeping

    Wider context from the report

    “5 5 It is suggested that there was an absence of timely, full and accurate clinical record keeping by members of GMMH mental health staff (whether they be healthcare assistants, nurses or doctors) This is a professional requirement under GMC Good Practice and the NMC code of conduct It is suggested that steps are taken to ensure this is completed in all cases and appropriate audits undertaken to check on this. ”

    Source location

    Tomasz Nowosad · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify participating healthcare staff and verify completeness of System One records

    Wider context from the report

    “5 6 It is suggested that whenever there is a healthcare interaction with a patient prisoner and more than one healthcare member of staff is present, their identities should be recorded and all clinically relevant information is included within the System One records and checked between those present as being full and complete ”

    Source location

    Tomasz Nowosad · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The healthcare provider is responsible for responding separately to concerns about clinical issues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am grateful to you for bringing to my attention a number of matters of concern, many of which are relevant across the prison estate. I have consulted with the Governor of HMP Manchester and, where relevant, will mention action that has been taken locally at the prison as well as work that is taking place at national level. I understand that the healthcare provider is responding separately to your concerns about clinical issues.”

    Source location

    2019-0445-Response-from-HMPPS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 8 January 2020

    Open published response
  10. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Sidney Clarence Baker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sidney Clarence Baker, a frail elderly man with multiple co-morbidities, died at the Royal Albert Edward Infirmary in Wigan after a deterioration in health and treatment for acute kidney injury following a fall. The report raised concerns that required dietician and falls-team referrals were not documented, and that care-plan entries, including weight-monitoring information, were incorrect and record keeping was generally poor.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain accurate and adequate care records

    Wider context from the report

    “2. There were concerns that entries contained in Mr Baker's care plan were incorrect, including vital information contained on his weight monitoring sheet. Furthermore, the general quality of record keeping was poor. ”

    Source location

    Sidney Clarence Baker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain contemporaneous documentation of Dieticians or Falls Team referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “1. There were no contemporaneous documents that a Dieticians or Falls Team referral had been made by the Care Home personnel in question ”

    Source location

    Sidney Clarence Baker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue quality-assurance monitoring through support visits, scrutiny of records and care plans, and follow-up of referral effectiveness.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Between the 11th July 2019 and 16th January 2020, a total of 9 monitoring and support visits have taken place at Barley Brook. This involves the Quality Performance Officers from Wigan Council visiting the service and scrutinising service delivery and making recommendations to ensure that the service is not only compliant with the Care Quality Commission’s regulations but that best practice and innovation is instilled into all areas.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Wigan-Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recommend that the provider source training for all staff on effective record keeping, dementia and nutrition.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Training: We visited the provider on 16 January 2020 and scrutinised the training programme at Barley Brook. Wigan Council recommended that the provider sources training for all staff in both effective record keeping and dementia and nutrition. Wigan Council consider that such training is necessary to ensure that all staff team members recognise the importance of good record keeping, their role within this and what the consequences of poor record keeping can be. The training in relation to dementia and nutrition will provide staff with a deeper understanding in order to deliver a more person-centred service. The training will provide learning such as how dementia can affect a person intake including managing weight loss, changes in food taste and preferences that can occur and methods in which to increase a person’s intake.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Wigan-Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor the provider’s uptake of recommended training and its impact on service-user experiences.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Training: We visited the provider on 16 January 2020 and scrutinised the training programme at Barley Brook. Wigan Council recommended that the provider sources training for all staff in both effective record keeping and dementia and nutrition. Wigan Council consider that such training is necessary to ensure that all staff team members recognise the importance of good record keeping, their role within this and what the consequences of poor record keeping can be. The training in relation to dementia and nutrition will provide staff with a deeper understanding in order to deliver a more person-centred service. The training will provide learning such as how dementia can affect a person intake including managing weight loss, changes in food taste and preferences that can occur and methods in which to increase a person’s intake.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Wigan-Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Highlight three possible regulatory breaches concerning record keeping, staff training and support, and provider quality monitoring.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In accordance with CQC’s regulatory remit, we will be highlighting three possible breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities)”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-CQC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a further comprehensive inspection within 12 months to verify that the provider has addressed the identified breaches.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will carry out a further comprehensive inspection within 12 months, to ensure action has been taken and the provider is no longer in breach. Should this not be the case, we will consider further regulatory action.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-CQC
    Page 3 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a weekly and monthly weight-monitoring and weight-loss escalation system linked to Caredocs and care plans, including dietetic, GP and SALT referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Point 2 – The home has in place Monthly Weights and Loss action file which identifies any residents currently on weekly weights, this system links in with the Caredocs and Care plans. Weights are done and recorded within a weights file which is kept up to date on a weekly/monthly basis by the Manager / Deputy Manager and if a resident starts to lose weight, it is immediately highlighted and actioned. The information from this file is then transferred over to the monthly audit file with Actions taken. Referrals to Dietician and GP, and if necessary, SALT team. Families are notified and kept up to date with ongoing progress. All the information is updated within the care plans which also include fluid charts and food plans. Additionally, Anne-Marie Peters (Compliance officer for Wigan Council) undertakes rigorous checks on these areas on a monthly basis.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Rosewood
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit weight-loss records weekly and monthly, cross-reference them with care plans and record resulting actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Point 2 – The home has in place Monthly Weights and Loss action file which identifies any residents currently on weekly weights, this system links in with the Caredocs and Care plans. Weights are done and recorded within a weights file which is kept up to date on a weekly/monthly basis by the Manager / Deputy Manager and if a resident starts to lose weight, it is immediately highlighted and actioned. The information from this file is then transferred over to the monthly audit file with Actions taken. Referrals to Dietician and GP, and if necessary, SALT team. Families are notified and kept up to date with ongoing progress. All the information is updated within the care plans which also include fluid charts and food plans. Additionally, Anne-Marie Peters (Compliance officer for Wigan Council) undertakes rigorous checks on these areas on a monthly basis.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Rosewood
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain person-centred Caredocs care plans identifying individual needs, with Home Manager and Regional Manager care-plan audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All staff within Barley Brook undertake both online and face to face training to ensure the safe delivery of care, which also includes the specific training on Manual Handling, Falls, and Person-centred Care. There are Rigorous auditing systems in place which cover all areas of the home to ensure that residents are safe from Harm. Care Plans on the Caredocs system are person centred and identify each individual need in order to meet the care delivered. Care Plan Audits are conducted by the Home Manager. In addition, during my Regional Managers visit on a monthly basis, I undertake care plan audits. As a Regional Manager I also have full access to the Caredocs cloud system which allows me to have access all residents care plans within each of the homes. Resident Assessments are also done prior to admission by the trusted assessor to ensure the appropriateness of a placement.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Rosewood
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate an accidents and incidents system linked to Caredocs and care plans, with falls triage, clinical referrals, family updates and required safeguarding or regulatory notifications.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Point 1 – The home has in place Accidents and Incidents file which includes Falls and near misses. The file also has an Action and Review with specific outcomes. The information within the file links in with Caredocs and the individuals care plan. Once a fall has been logged (depending on the severity), the home will follow the Local Authority Triage system (which notifications are located in the Manager’s office and the Communication Book); in other cases, symptoms of UTI are tested, a referral is done to the Physio and Moving and Handling team (Falls Team). In addition, families are contacted and kept up to date of the process. In addition, the incidents are recorded within the file, and if necessary and where applicable notifications are done to both the Safeguarding team and the CQC.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Rosewood
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing weight-monitoring, care-plan, auditing and staff-training arrangements are considered sufficient to address inaccurate records and poor record keeping.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Point 2 – The home has in place Monthly Weights and Loss action file which identifies any residents currently on weekly weights, this system links in with the Caredocs and Care plans. Weights are done and recorded within a weights file which is kept up to date on a weekly/monthly basis by the Manager / Deputy Manager and if a resident starts to lose weight, it is immediately highlighted and actioned. The information from this file is then transferred over to the monthly audit file with Actions taken. Referrals to Dietician and GP, and if necessary, SALT team. Families are notified and kept up to date with ongoing progress. All the information is updated within the care plans which also include fluid charts and food plans. Additionally, Anne-Marie Peters (Compliance officer for Wigan Council) undertakes rigorous checks on these areas on a monthly basis.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Rosewood
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing falls, incident monitoring and referral procedures are considered sufficient to address concerns about dietician and falls-team referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Point 1 – The home has in place Accidents and Incidents file which includes Falls and near misses. The file also has an Action and Review with specific outcomes. The information within the file links in with Caredocs and the individuals care plan. Once a fall has been logged (depending on the severity), the home will follow the Local Authority Triage system (which notifications are located in the Manager’s office and the Communication Book); in other cases, symptoms of UTI are tested, a referral is done to the Physio and Moving and Handling team (Falls Team). In addition, families are contacted and kept up to date of the process. In addition, the incidents are recorded within the file, and if necessary and where applicable notifications are done to both the Safeguarding team and the CQC.”

    Source location

    2019-0407-Response-by-Rosewood
    Page 1 · response
    Published 29 December 2019

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026