Recurring concern

Incomplete, inaccurate or unavailable clinical and care records

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 26 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures affecting the completeness, accuracy, consistency, availability, legibility or contemporaneous maintenance of patient, resident and clinical care records.

Not included

  • Information-transfer failures where the underlying records are reliable
  • Documentation dedicated to a separately named safety system when that system supplies the more faithful parent boundary
  • Non-care administrative records
Reports
474

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
568

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
780

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care64
NHS England38
Care Quality Commission30
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board12
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust11
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust10
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust10
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust10
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust10
Office of the Chief Coroner9
Recipient name withheld9
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust9
Barts Health NHS Trust8
East London NHS Foundation Trust8
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust8

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Preston and West Lancashire

    AI-generated summary

    Marcin Miroslaw Mazarek · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Marcin Miroslaw Mazarek became mentally unwell, a condition exacerbated by a very long period in segregation, began to self-harm and ultimately hanged himself. Concerns included very poor medical record keeping, missed or unrecorded medical checks in segregation, an inappropriately long period in segregation, failure to properly implement ACCT procedures, lack of multidisciplinary working and mental health involvement, and inadequate reporting by discipline and medical teams.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain complete medical records of required checks

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Medical record keeping was of very poor quality (2) The daily medical checks in segregation by members of the nursing team and the tri-weekly checks by the GP team, were frequently not recorded in the medical notes and / or did not take place. ”

    Source location

    Marcin Miroslaw Mazarek · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Simon Willans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Simon Willans was admitted to Ysbyty Gwynedd with breathlessness, recent loss of consciousness and a swollen right calf, and was discharged with diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension and anxiety. He died from a pulmonary embolism the following day. Concerns included inadequate assessment and follow-up, failure to elicit a family history of pulmonary embolism, lack of safety-netting, and failure to commence heparin despite DVT/PE being a differential diagnosis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Addition of diagnoses to clinical correspondence without examining the patient

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Mr Willans appears to have been discharged by a Nurse Practioner ████████ who had no involvement in the care of Mr Willans. ████████, or any other doctor does not appear to have been involved in the discharge of Mr Willans. Nurse Practitioner Jones adds another diagnosis to the GP letter over and above that of her colleague despite never seeing the patient. ”

    Source location

    Simon Willans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record consultant assessment and review of clinical results

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) ████████ the Consultant in charge of the unit did not make any entries in any of the notes for Mr Willans . There is no record of him examining the patient, the abnormal test results, the detail of the ultrasound scan. ”

    Source location

    Simon Willans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Dennis George Redmore · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dennis George Redmore was admitted to hospital with a blocked catheter and presumed urinary tract infection while receiving palliative treatment for lymphoma. After an unwitnessed fall in hospital on 6 March 2017, he deteriorated, was found to have a subdural haematoma, and died later the following evening. The report identified gaps in neurological observations, delayed response to abnormal observations, and inadequate management to ensure checks were completed; it did not establish that these failures caused or contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record observations

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There where clear failures to monitor the deceased neurologically with gaps of several hours between observations. He should have been monitored every 30 minutes but was in fact, according to the evidence monitored at 20:15, 21:00, 22:00, 23:00, 01:00, 04:00, 07:30 and 08:50. “NEWS” observations were carried out and one was carried out at 06:20 on the morning of the 7th March which revealed an elevation in blood pressure and pulse. That was not acted upon for approximately another hour. The evidence suggested that the observations may have undertaken but not recorded. The clear concern is that observations were not carried out in accordance with local and national guidance. There was no clear evidence in this case that the lack of observations had in fact caused or contributed to the death of Mr Redmore but this must give rise to a concern for the welfare of others. No appropriate management of the nurse responsible for the observations was in place to ensure the checks were carried out. ”

    Source location

    Dennis George Redmore · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit October AMU fall-patient documentation for compliance with neurological observation requirements and identify improvement and support needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• For the month of October 2017 documentation to be reviewed (audit) on all patients who have sustained a fall on AMU which will include compliance with neurological observations”

    Source location

    2017-0315-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 November 2017

    Open published response
  4. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Songul BOZDAG · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Songul Bozdag, who had schizophrenia and other mental health conditions, died after jumping from a tenth-floor window on 9 February 2017. Concerns included missed mandatory reviews, incomplete recording of consultations, failure to record a required care plan approach, an incorrect drug card that left her under-medicated, and the absence of a system safety net to identify these errors.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record mandatory monthly care reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Ms Bozdag’s care co-ordinator did not arrange for what was a mandatory say review of Ms Bozdag after discharge from hospital in August/September 2016. 2. She recorded monthly reviews of Ms Bozdag on only half of the months from September 2016 to Ms Bozdag’s death in February 2017, though monthly reviews were mandatory. 3. The care co-ordinator gave evidence at inquest that she had actually reviewed Ms Bozdag once a fortnight when Ms Bozdag came for her depot injections, but in the main did not record these discussions. She did include in her statement for the court one note recording the nature of a discussion had on 10 February. This was in fact the day after death. She said this was an error. 4. She described having a very good recollection of individual consultations with Ms Bozdag, such as one on 6 September 2016 though there was no record supporting this description. However, she had not had a sufficient recollection of Ms Bozdag’s treatment during her life to notice that the need for a care plan approach (CPA) had not been recorded on the computer system. 5. Finally, the care co-ordinator did not ensure that the drug card in use reflected the psychiatrist’s increased prescription of 50mg of risperidone rather than the original one of 37.5mg. Ms Bozdag was therefore under medicated on an ongoing basis. These were the errors of an individual, but there is an additional point that they were not captured by any sort of system safety net during Ms Bozdag’s life. ”

    Source location

    Songul BOZDAG · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide monthly supervision for all care coordinators, covering care-plan delivery, reviews, CPA status and record-keeping, with regular compliance audits.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The key system for monitoring the ongoing support provided to service users by a care coordinator is monthly supervision. This had not been robustly undertaken within the CMHT and I am pleased to report that this is now working in line with Trust procedures with all care coordinators receiving monthly supervision. Standing agenda items in supervision include CPA status, delivery of the care plan including monitoring of visits and medical reviews and the standard to record keeping. Regular audits are being undertaken to maintain a robust oversight on the process and also actively respond to any gaps in the system in a timely way and to provide assurance that staff are working to agreed record keeping standards and practice.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 September 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review internal monitoring processes to identify gaps in CPA reviews and regular contact.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above a review of internal monitoring process has been undertaken to assure the Trust that systems are sufficiently robust and will flag up any cases where service users on CPA are not being seen regularly or reviewed by their consultant. Teams have access to live reports which allows real time activity by the Team and can be drilled down to provide data on an individual service user. The Team administrator also sends out weekly prompts around key performance indicators to the Operational Team Lead and this includes activity for patients on CPA.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 September 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide teams with live activity reports and weekly performance prompts covering CPA patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to the above a review of internal monitoring process has been undertaken to assure the Trust that systems are sufficiently robust and will flag up any cases where service users on CPA are not being seen regularly or reviewed by their consultant. Teams have access to live reports which allows real time activity by the Team and can be drilled down to provide data on an individual service user. The Team administrator also sends out weekly prompts around key performance indicators to the Operational Team Lead and this includes activity for patients on CPA.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 September 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The London Borough of Tower Hamlets is handling formal processes addressing the care coordinator’s conduct, with Trust support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Before setting out the steps that the Trust is taken in relation to improving systems I would like to reassure you that the issues highlighted in relation to the conduct of the care co-ordinator. One of the first actions taken was an audit of the care coordinators case load to ascertain if she was working to agreed record keeping standards and practice. The gaps in the care that she provided to Ms Bozdag are currently being dealt with by her employer, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets, through formal processes with the full support of the Trust and the individual in question is not working with patients whilst these processes are ongoing.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 September 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implemented CMHT systems are considered sufficient to address concerns about monitoring care coordinators.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With the systems that are now implemented at the CMHT I hope you will be content that the Trust has taken these issues seriously and adequately addressed your concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 September 2017

    Open published response
  5. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    James Albert Harris · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Albert Harris died in hospital on 3 April 2017 after a fall at his care home, sustaining a fractured neck of femur and subsequently deteriorating with pneumonia, Clostridium difficile infection and underlying health conditions. Concerns included inadequate falls-policy awareness and application, failure to seek medical attention after he reported pain, lack of analgesia, inadequate records of routine checks, and the care home being without a registered manager.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record routine resident checks

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Records of routine checks on residents are not made. Therefore whilst it was asserted that Mr. Harris was checked hourly throughout following the fall there is no evidence that the checks were carried out, by whom and what was found. ”

    Source location

    James Albert Harris · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record residents’ hourly or two-hourly nightly checks on signed night-check sheets.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4) Records of nightly checks are in place. This identifies when residents were checked either hourly or two hourly at their request. This is then recorded on the night check sheet and signed by staff on duty.”

    Source location

    2017-0334-Response-by-Care-First-Class-UK
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor staff records and address issues arising from record completion.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6) There is a manager in post at Cherry Lodge at present. ████████ does have registration for another service and will register with CQC in due course. Staff are being spoken to individually at Cherry Lodge as to their understanding and their roles and responsibilities in the event of any accident or incidents in the home. Management staff are monitoring records that staff are completing and addressing any issues arising from this.”

    Source location

    2017-0334-Response-by-Care-First-Class-UK
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Registered Provider remains responsible for ensuring monitoring checks are conducted and accurately recorded.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Registered Provider has a duty to ensure processes are followed to protect service users from the risk of harm, which includes monitoring the checks made on service users were conducted and reviewing the records of these checks. The care staff at Cherry Lodge were aware that they should have recorded when checks were made on Mr Harris. However, the Registered Provider has the overall responsibility to ensure there are appropriate processes in place which should ensure regular monitoring checks are made on people and accurately recorded.”

    Source location

    2017-0334-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 7 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response
  6. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Ms Edith Robinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ms Edith Robinson was admitted to Accident and Emergency after a fall, with problems identified with her prosthetic hip. Surgery was delayed and, as she deteriorated, action was not taken to rescue her; she died at Royal Oldham Hospital on 20 June 2016. The report identified concerns about weekend consultant review, early warning score calculation and use, record keeping, escalation, communication and other aspects of care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor record keeping by doctors and nurses

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Record Keeping - the standard of record keeping by both doctors and nurses was poor. This is a recurring theme. Given that accurate record keeping is vital to patient safety (particularly where nowadays patients are no longer continuously cared for by the ‘parent' medical team for the duration of their hospital stay) I am concerned that poor record keeping is putting patient safety at risk. ”

    Source location

    Ms Edith Robinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Ivy Mitchell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ivy Mitchell, a care home resident with a history of falls, fell on 29 December 2016 and later developed a subcapital fracture and pneumonia. She deteriorated and died on 26 January 2017; concerns included inaccurate falls-risk documentation, inadequate understanding of post-fall processes and observations, failure to escalate appropriately, and lack of understanding about referral to the community nutrition team.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate falls-risk documentation

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The documentation relating to the falls risk was inaccurate. It did not refer to previous falls and did not reflect her mobility; ”

    Source location

    Ivy Mitchell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit documentation on service users’ falls and mobility.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I enclose my reply, in response to regulation 28 in the case of Mrs Ivy Mitchell. I have now audited all the documentation in relation to falls and mobility of all the service users. In relation to Mrs Mitchell, I accept that the documentation and risk assessments did not accurately reflect her falls or mobility, which has caused me great concern.”

    Source location

    2017-0453-Response-by-Fairfield-View-Care-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit care plans and daily records daily and weekly for accurate risk assessments and fall documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Senior staff attended the meeting ████████ held in relation to documentation and the falls procedure. Details of which, I enclose. This information has been cascaded down to staff, and the importance of completing all the relevant documentation was discussed at length. I have emphasised the failings in relation to Mrs Mitchell, and that we must ensure it does not happen again to any of the service users. I am now auditing all care plans and daily records on a daily and weekly basis, to ensure accuracy regarding risk assessments, and that documentation in the event of a fall is completed accurately and in a timely manner.”

    Source location

    2017-0453-Response-by-Fairfield-View-Care-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide care-planning training covering accurate risk assessments, service-user needs, documentation and involvement in care planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Unit Managers, Deputies and Senior Care Staff are undertaking a course on care planning, this will commence in September of this year with Tameside College. This will include how to complete an accurate risk assessment as well as identifying the needs of the service user. This course will provide them with more knowledge about the importance of documentation and of the need to involve the service user, where there is capacity, or their relatives in all care planning activities.”

    Source location

    2017-0453-Response-by-Fairfield-View-Care-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 18 July 2017

    Open published response
  8. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Janet Silva Müller · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janet Silva Müller, a patient detained under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act 1983 at Millview Hospital, died on 13 March 2015 after being found in the boot of a burning car; the circumstances were recorded as unlawful killing following her absconding from hospital. The principal concerns were incomplete and contradictory records, handovers, risk assessments and care plans, inadequate staffing, and insufficient measures to prevent detained patients from absconding.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain complete, sufficient and consistent nursing records, handovers, risk assessments and care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Nursing records, handovers, risk assessments and care plans were often incomplete, insufficient and at times contradictory. Whilst we were told that regular auditing is carried out by the Trust of nursing records it is clear that this is not fit for purpose as it is did not identify the fact that there were gaps in Janet’s nursing records and other key documents. The lack of proper record keeping increased Janet’s risk. ”

    Source location

    Janet Silva Müller · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Newcastle upon Tyne

    AI-generated summary

    Sheila Mary Hynes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sheila Mary Hynes died after an aortic and mitral valve replacement procedure in which a mechanical aortic valve was remounted in an inverted position and re-implanted. The resulting acute heart damage led to her death. Concerns included remounting the valve contrary to the manufacturer’s instructions, inadequate awareness of the associated risks, and directing a scrub nurse without relevant training or experience to remount it.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to involve and record discussions with the primary surgeon before remounting the valve

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) During Mrs Hynes operation a direction was given to remount the Sorin Carbomedics 23mm mechanical aortic valve on its holder whilst preparations to implant the valve were undertaken. Remounting the valve on its holder is contrary to the manufacturer’s instructions for use. Concerns arising are: a) The rational for departing from the manufacturer's instructions for use was neither discussed nor recorded. b) The primary surgeon and operating team were unaware of the risks of departing from the manufacturer's instructions for use namely potential inverted remount. c) A scrub nurse with neither training nor experience was instructed to remount the valve contrary to the manufacturer's instructions for use. The rational for this direction was neither discussed nor recorded. d) The primary surgeon with overall responsibility for the procedure did not instruct remounting of the valve; There are no recorded discussions with the primary surgeon on this issue. ”

    Source location

    Sheila Mary Hynes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Preston and East Lancashire

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Cardwell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Cardwell was under the care of a Home Treatment Team but was discharged after information about his missed appointment and request for a further appointment was not passed to the multidisciplinary team. He later expressed suicidal thoughts, described a plan to hang himself using a football scarf, and was found deceased at home on 29 September 2016 after hanging himself. Concerns included failures in communication, failure to discuss or follow up his request for an appointment, and inadequate record keeping during multidisciplinary team meetings.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate record keeping during MDT meetings

    Wider context from the report

    “On the 6th August 2016 Mr Cardwell was seen in hospital by a member of the liaison team following a significant overdose. He was later discharged from hospital and he queried with the HTT on the 9th August 2016 (on attending West Strand House in person) whether he was due a follow-up with the HTT. Mr Cardwell was told that the MDT would be asked the following day and that someone would contact him from the team to let him know. I found that the message was - on this occasion - relayed by the Duty Practitioner to the MDT on the 10th August 2016. However, the MDT did not discuss Mr Cardwell and nothing was recorded about him. No-one contacted Mr Cardwell back to advise him as to whether or not he would have an appointment with the HTT. I heard evidence that the MDT meeting could be disorganised. I am concerned that Mr Cardwell was not considered by the team, despite the message being handed over to them. I am also concerned about a lack of record keeping during the MDT. Even where patients are discussed, the notes appear to be very brief. ”

    Source location

    Robert Cardwell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026