Recurring concern

Inadequate safety incident investigations

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 13 Dec 2008•Latest report 25 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes initiation, evidence gathering, witness testing, factual accuracy, analysis, timeliness, investigator competence and reporting within investigations of deaths, serious incidents and patient, resident or operational safety events.

Not included

  • Police, conduct, regulatory or other investigations not directed at organisational safety learning
  • Failure to implement an unrelated safety action not arising from an incident investigation
  • Generic governance failures not directly affecting a safety incident investigation or its learning process
  • Excludes downstream dissemination, learning and corrective-action controls once the investigation findings have been established.
Reports
244

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
316

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2008–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
447

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care31
Care Quality Commission21
NHS England20
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB11
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust10
Barts Health NHS Trust8
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust8
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust7
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust6
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust5
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust5
Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust5
Health and Safety Executive4
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency4
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board4

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Geoffrey Spencer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Geoffrey Spencer, a resident at The Lakes Care Centre, was found on the floor after an unwitnessed fall and later died in hospital from respiratory arrest secondary to aspiration pneumonia. The principal concern was that The Lakes had not formally investigated the incident, reducing the potential for learning to improve the safety of other residents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to undertake formal investigations of incidents

    Wider context from the report

    “Notwithstanding the serious injury sustained by Mr Spencer, and the residual possibility that this was sustained in circumstances where the lounge area was unattended by a member of staff, it is a matter of concern that no formal investigation has been undertaken in relation to this incident by The Lakes. Whilst evidence emerged in the course of the inquest of improvements to the Care Centre’s Falls Policy and more formal reporting and analysis of falls at The Lakes, it is a matter of concern that the absence of a formal investigation has reduced the potential for learning to be derived from this incident with a view to improving the safety of other residents. ”

    Source location

    Geoffrey Spencer · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigate the incident by reconstructing its timeline, staffing, roles and locations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You raised concern during the course of the inquest that no formal investigation had been undertaken in relation to this incident, by The Lakes. I responded at the time by informing you that we had recently redeveloped our falls policy, post falls assessment and carried out a monthly analysis of all falls at The Lakes. The concerns you raised led me to reflect on our current practice and review what we could do better. This started with a complete investigation into what had actually happened on the day of the incident;”

    Source location

    2017-0281-Response-by-The-Lakes-Care-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response
  2. North West Wales

    AI-generated summary

    Simon Willans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Simon Willans was admitted to Ysbyty Gwynedd with breathlessness, recent loss of consciousness and a swollen right calf, and was discharged with diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension and anxiety. He died from a pulmonary embolism the following day. Concerns included inadequate assessment and follow-up, failure to elicit a family history of pulmonary embolism, lack of safety-netting, and failure to commence heparin despite DVT/PE being a differential diagnosis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to effectively scrutinise the ambulatory care unit following a patient death

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) BCUHB have only just commenced an SIR on this matter and the ambulatory care unit, its structure, practices, systems, staff have not been effectively scrutinised following Mr Willans death in direct contravention of the policy of BCUHB on reporting and given this the following concerns do not appear to have been addressed potentially compromising patient safety until the conclusion of the SIR ”

    Source location

    Simon Willans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Somerset

    AI-generated summary

    Sofia Ann Legg · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sofia Ann Legg had a history of low mood and self-harm, received care from CAMHS, and was placed on a six-month waiting list for CBT. On 26 September 2016, her mother discovered her hanging at home, and the inquest concluded that her death was suicide. Concerns included access to CAMHS, delays in CBT, the lack of urgent psychiatric input, shortcomings in the recording and follow-up of a critical CAMHS meeting, and inappropriate language in the SIRI Report.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inaccurate conclusions in SIRI reports about care-plan effects and clinical-practice change

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Language used in the SIRI Report was felt to be inappropriate. The SIRI Report effectively said if the care plan had been followed the outcome might have been different and that no change in clinical practice would have resulted in any different outcome. I do not believe either of these statements were true. ”

    Source location

    Sofia Ann Legg · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train key investigators in national investigation tools and techniques and establish a trained investigator cohort.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5.2 The Trust has prioritised the need for all investigators to have the knowledge and ability to conduct a thorough, accurate and reliable investigation using national tools and techniques. Training of key staff in the use of these national tools and techniques has already commenced and by the end of 2017 a cohort of trained investigators will be in place.”

    Source location

    2017-0293-Response-by-Somerset-NHS-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement investigation terms and oversight processes that define family needs and ensure key questions are addressed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5.3 The scope and terms of reference for the investigation will be clearly defined to include the needs of families and there will be oversight throughout the process to ensure key questions are asked and answered, this will ensure that the Trust achieves credible investigations. This new process has already been implemented.”

    Source location

    2017-0293-Response-by-Somerset-NHS-Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Further review the investigation into Sofia’s death to challenge disputed statements and produce a balanced, sensitive report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5.6 In addition the Trust will further review the investigation into the death of Sofia. This review will seek to challenge the statements made and provide a balanced and sensitive report. This is due to complete by the end of January 2018.”

    Source location

    2017-0293-Response-by-Somerset-NHS-Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 27 November 2017

    Open published response
  4. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Patricia Forshaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Patricia Forshaw fell at home, sustaining a full-thickness wound to her right leg, which developed signs of infection. She died in hospital after suffering a cardiac arrest at home. Concerns included unclear discharge information and telephone advice, failures to record or communicate clinical information, lack of routine observations and blood investigations, and inadequate escalation for review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate Emergency Department incidents for Serious Incident Review

    Wider context from the report

    “iv. The evidence at the Inquest confirmed that there had been a discussion between Consultants in the Emergency Department in relation to the treatment and care of Mrs Forshaw but the treatment and care of Mrs Forshaw had not been escalated as a formal report for consideration of a Serious Incident Review. Accordingly, a Serious Incident Review had not taken place in relation to Mrs Forshaw’s death, although it was accepted that, in retrospect, a Review should have taken place to enable any recommendations to be formalised within the Governance framework. ”

    Source location

    Patricia Forshaw · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Cambridgeshire and Peterborough

    AI-generated summary

    Sam Antony Crick · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sam Antony Crick, aged 24, developed recurrent hydrocephalus and progressively raised intracranial pressure before a catastrophic collapse on 29 February 2016. He underwent emergency neurosurgical intervention but died at Addenbrookes Hospital on 4 March 2016. The concerns included missed radiological and ophthalmological signs of rising intracranial pressure, delays in obtaining and considering important imaging information, and the absence of a serious incident investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to conduct a serious incident report into a preventable death

    Wider context from the report

    “(A).This was a significant adverse event and the death was preventable. However, there have been no serious incident report (SIR) into the death. The importance of the SIR process is to consider root causes and importantly, to make recommendations and implement an action plan. Learning lessons is a key feature of the process. ”

    Source location

    Sam Antony Crick · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review externally reported deaths weekly through Morbidity and Mortality sessions, identify lessons and provide feedback to referring hospitals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is normal practice for the Division to discuss all deaths at the Trust within 30 days of death and where indicated to notify of a potential SI in accordance with the Trust’s Incident & Serious Incident Policy. At the time of Sam’s death the Trust had no process to review externally reported deaths. This will be addressed in the SIR with a recommendation that all externally reported deaths are reviewed weekly as part of a Morbidity and Mortality session to identify any lessons and feedback to referring hospitals.”

    Source location

    2017-0457-Response-by-Barking-Havering-and-Redbridge-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete the ongoing Significant Incident investigation into the death.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following receipt of the Coroner’s Regulation 28 report a Significant Incident (SI) notification was completed by the Division and an SI declared by the Trust’s corporate team on 31 August 2017. SI investigations are currently ongoing and the report will be shared with the Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCG’s); Barking, Havering and Redbridge Clinical Commissioning Group (BHRCCG) and North East London Commissioning Support Group (NELCSU) on or before 23 November 2017. The CCG’s then has 20 days to consider the report and agree the findings.”

    Source location

    2017-0457-Response-by-Barking-Havering-and-Redbridge-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Investigate the identified examination and specialist-advice failures through the ongoing Significant Incident investigation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Consultant Neurosurgeon involved in these examinations is no longer practicing in the Trust and is therefore unable to personally comment. These failures are however, being investigated as part of the ongoing SIR and recommendations will be made to ensure that these issues do not happen again.”

    Source location

    2017-0457-Response-by-Barking-Havering-and-Redbridge-University-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 25 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Seek assurances from the Trust that concerns have been addressed in line with the Serious Incident Framework.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England acknowledges the concerns you have raised with the Trust and we will seek their assurances that they have addressed such matters in line with the Serious Incident Framework. We will also suggest to the Trust that an independent review of the case management ought to be carried out as this would be helpful in understanding the failings in this case and to prevent any future deaths.”

    Source location

    2017-0457-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 25 August 2017

    Open published response
  6. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Francesca Whyatt · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Francesca Whyatt, who was at known risk from ligatures, was found unconscious with tights around her neck at the Priory Hospital on 25 September 2013 and died in hospital on 28 September 2013. The report identifies concerns about the ward’s four-floor configuration, observation arrangements, control of ligature items, staffing and training, and the lack of clear criteria for investigating ligature and other self-harming incidents as serious untoward incidents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear guidance or criteria for treating ligature or other self-harming incidents as SUIs to trigger investigation

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) There is no clear guidance or criteria on the circumstances in which a ligature incident/s (or other self-harming incident/s) should be treated as an SUI such as to trigger an SUI investigation. ”

    Source location

    Francesca Whyatt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Manchester (North)

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Roger Hamer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Roger Hamer fell from his bicycle on Bury New Road, suffering a traumatic brain injury and multiple fractures, and died in hospital from those injuries on 2 April 2016. The inquest jury found that a pothole probably caused his fall. Concerns included inadequate recording and monitoring of carriageway deterioration, a lack of paint markings around potholes, the absence of a duty-of-candour procedure for investigating significant incidents, and proposed highway-management thresholds that might increase risks to cyclists.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an effective significant-incident investigation and learning procedure

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The Highway Authority does not have a procedure with a duty of candour for the effective investigation of, and learning lessons from, significant incidents comparable to those adopted by other public bodies (for example within the National Health Service). ”

    Source location

    Mr Roger Hamer · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement a formal follow-up investigation procedure for highway incidents reported by Greater Manchester Police.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3) GMP investigates highway incidents and reports these to Bury Council by the STATS 19 process. Any incidents linked to road defects (either condition or layout) are acted upon as soon as possible.”

    Source location

    2017-0259-Response-by-Bury-Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 November 2017

    Open published response
  8. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Helen Theresa Cannon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Helen Theresa Cannon fell at home on 2 April 2017 and was assisted from the floor by Eldercare emergency responders without medical or paramedic assistance being sought. She had suffered internal haemorrhage from a pelvic fracture sustained in the fall and died two days later; concerns were also identified about inaccuracies in the moving and handling risk assessment and flaws in Eldercare’s subsequent investigation.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure understanding of the meaning of countersigning risk assessment checklists

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Following Mrs Cannon’s death Eldercare carried out an investigation. The investigation was flawed in that it did not address clear inaccuracies in the Moving and Handling Risk assessment checklist completed by one of the Emergency Responders, nor did it discover that the other Emergency Responder attending did not understand that he was agreeing with the accuracy of the information recorded on the checklist when he countersigned it. It was his belief that he signed the checklist simply to agree that he had been present. ”

    Source location

    Helen Theresa Cannon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to address inaccuracies in moving and handling risk assessment checklists during investigations

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Following Mrs Cannon’s death Eldercare carried out an investigation. The investigation was flawed in that it did not address clear inaccuracies in the Moving and Handling Risk assessment checklist completed by one of the Emergency Responders, nor did it discover that the other Emergency Responder attending did not understand that he was agreeing with the accuracy of the information recorded on the checklist when he countersigned it. It was his belief that he signed the checklist simply to agree that he had been present. ”

    Source location

    Helen Theresa Cannon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Redesign the investigation checklist with STOP alerts, defined sections, clearer larger formatting, and clarified second-responder accuracy checks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. With regard to the second concern expressed, namely the thoroughness of the investigation, we acknowledge, after further review of the documentation, that the review was conducted with the level of rigor and accuracy that the checklist has also been fully reviewed as part of (i) above. We have introduced “STOP” elements to alert the responders where their answers are such that further assistance may be necessary. We have also separated the checklist out into defined areas and made the layout of the checklist easier and larger which we believe will also assist the staff in completing the documentation. Additionally, the responsibility for the second responder to review the accuracy of a colleague’s client assessment has been clarified with all of the staff, and the timeline of the update has been agreed with Wigan Council.”

    Source location

    2017-0260-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add an internal review step to investigations while preserving employees’ rights to appeal after formal investigation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This has also been reflected within the re-design of the document. An additional step with regard to review was also been added to the internal company process of investigation in such cases, whilst still maintaining the integrity of the procedure in line with protecting the employee’s rights to appeal following a formal investigation. We believe that this will ensure that future investigations will deliver the required result.”

    Source location

    2017-0260-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 November 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The investigation was conducted with sufficient rigour and accuracy despite concerns about its thoroughness.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. With regard to the second concern expressed, namely the thoroughness of the investigation, we acknowledge, after further review of the documentation, that the review was conducted with the level of rigor and accuracy that the checklist has also been fully reviewed as part of (i) above. We have introduced “STOP” elements to alert the responders where their answers are such that further assistance may be necessary. We have also separated the checklist out into defined areas and made the layout of the checklist easier and larger which we believe will also assist the staff in completing the documentation. Additionally, the responsibility for the second responder to review the accuracy of a colleague’s client assessment has been clarified with all of the staff, and the timeline of the update has been agreed with Wigan Council.”

    Source location

    2017-0260-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 November 2017

    Open published response
  9. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Jeffrey William Matthews · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jeffrey William Matthews suffered fatal injuries when his motorcycle collided with a Nissan Juke at the C2051 crossroads on 26 March 2017. The report raised concerns that the crossroads and Give Way sign were obscured by hedgerows and that warning signage was inadequate, with previously recommended safety measures not implemented due to a lack of resources.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of independent highway safety investigations to identify obscured junction visibility

    Wider context from the report

    “The C1021 is a minor country road that runs from the A595 at Orton Grange Roundabout in a north westerly direction and terminates when it joins the C2051 at Great Orton village. The road is generally unmarked and just wide enough for two vehicles to pass in opposite directions. The statutory speed limit is 60 mph. Approximately 220 metres prior to the scene of the collision on the C1021, is a left hand bend as you approach from the A595. The bend travels through an angle of approximately 16 degrees before the road straightens on the approach to the crossroads. The C1021 is straight for approximately 196 metres from the bend to the crossroad and continues straight beyond the crossroads for approximately 159 metres before entering another left hand bend. The police collision investigation report dated 14th August 2017 identifies at paragraph 4.4 that at this point, the presence of the crossroad junction is not obvious to any approaching vehicle. The height of the roadside hedgerows and their close proximity cause a tunnel effect and as such obscure any sign of the crossroads. It is also noted that the presence of the 'Give Way' sign at the crossroad junction is lost in the background and therefore not obviously visible to approaching drivers from a distance. Cumbria County Council is responsible for implementing measures on the county highway network that aim to reduce casualties and the risk of collisions. The C2051 Great Orton Crossroad was previously identified as having a sufficiently serious collision record during the period 1st October 2012 up to 30th September 2015. Capita were commissioned to carry out an independent investigation and inspection. The finding in the police investigation report at paragraph 4.4 as set out above was not identified by Capita. Evidence was heard at the inquest that the recommendations made by Capita in their report dated May 2016 were not implemented due to a lack of resources. The recommendations were; 1. The application of High Friction Surfacing on the north and southbound approached 2. Vegetation trimming – cutting back vegetation to the south-east, north-east and north-west quadrant verge areas 3. Additional Road markings on C1021 junction approaches – provide ‘SLOW’ markings on red patch on the C1021 approaches, adjacent to warning signs. (1) The current warning signage on approach to the junction from a north westerly direction is inadequate. (2) The height of the roadside hedgerows and their close proximity causes a tunnel effect obscuring any sign of the crossroads restricting visibility. (3) Modifications to the junction on approach as recommended by Capita should be re-considered to minimise the risk of incidents and death in the future. ”

    Source location

    Jeffrey William Matthews · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Wiltshire and Swindon

    AI-generated summary

    Doreen Helen MILLER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Doreen Helen MILLER, a vulnerable and housebound adult, was discharged home after an intermediate-care placement despite concerns about unusual toileting behaviour, possible cognitive impairment, self-neglect and limited provisions. She was found severely hypothermic in her cold, dark flat the next morning and died at hospital on 13 January 2016. The principal concerns included safeguarding referrals not being properly investigated, important cognitive information not being communicated, poor record-keeping and decision-making, insufficient assessment of mental capacity, and inadequate systems for reviewing serious incidents and learning from them.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the serious-incident review and learning system

    Wider context from the report

    “e) (Wiltshire Health & Care) Having commenced a Coronial Investigation I tasked Coroners Officers to make a number of enquiries on my behalf and that included securing statements. As part of documentation that was disclosed by Wiltshire Health and Care was an email from Intermediate Care Lead Carol Langley-Johnson, her email sent to Acting Coroner’s Officer ███████ on 4th July 2016 contained a final paragraph that said “I have no concern about the standards of care provided by my team, I have read their statements and feel that this is a fair representation of rehab she received”. As will have been abundantly clear from reading this report and my Narrative Conclusion I did not share the same view as Ms Langley-Johnson and I am concerned and surprised that prior to the Inquest Final Hearing that no attempt was undertaken to carry out any form of Serious Case Review by Wiltshire Health and Care, formerly Great Western Hospital. I am concerned as regards the system in place that will pick up serious incidents for review and the mechanism in place to undertake investigations with a view to learning points being highlighted, the consideration of procedural changes and the implementation of any changes including additional training needs where required. I am concerned that there may be other incidences where there are learning points where there has not been a review and whilst those incidents may not have resulted in the death of an individual that the learning points have not been recognised and therefore there is the potential out there for repetition and in extreme circumstances repetition of dangerous practice that may lead to death and the involvement of me and my office. ”

    Source location

    Doreen Helen MILLER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026