Recurring concern

Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 May 2013•Latest report 16 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of explicitly multi-agency communication procedures that impair the timely, accurate and complete exchange of safety-relevant information between involved agencies, including the anchor's prison-services communication failure.

Not included

  • Excludes generic communication, training, staffing or coordination deficiencies where no explicitly multi-agency communication procedure is identified.
  • Excludes failures confined to a single organisation's internal communication process.
  • Excludes failures of a separately named pathway, system or hazard when that concern provides the more specific supported boundary.
  • Excludes neutral descriptions of multi-agency working without an identified unsafe communication condition.
Reports
134

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
145

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
303

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care17
NHS England17
Ministry of Justice14
HM Prison and Probation Service10
Home Office8
Recipient name withheld6
Metropolitan Police Service5
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives4
East London NHS Foundation Trust4
National Police Chiefs’ Council4
Care Quality Commission3
College of Policing3
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Greater Manchester Police3
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. West Sussex, Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Derek Thomas Burt · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derek Thomas Burt died at home on 15 May 2025 after a spontaneous rupture of an arterio-venous malformation at the back of his right ankle caused severe bleeding. The report raises concerns about communication between the careline service and ambulance services, including failure to pass on key information, delays in escalating the emergency, inadequate recording of information, and the loss of opportunities to provide basic first-aid advice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of awareness of available careline technology for direct patient contact and emergency-service conferencing

    Wider context from the report

    “1) I heard evidence from the call centre manager of Appello Careline and the first careline operator that their system had the capability to speak directly to Mrs Burt without her pressing her wrist alarm button as this could have been done via the digital base unit that was in her bedroom. The system can also set up a 3 way conversation or conference call to include any of the emergency services. Indeed the operator told me she has done this in the past if asked to do so by the emergency services or she has suggested it but she did not do so in this case as she took heed from the EMA. Conversely, I heard from a CSN with South East Coast Ambulance Service (SECAMB) that she did not know careline companies could set up 3 way conference calls for a CSN to speak to the patient or helper directly. She knew that Police and Fire Services used 3 way conference calls using careline systems but not Ambulance Trusts. This case had moved from the dispatch to the clinical stack and from the timeline of calls supplied it seems 15 calls were made between 22:52 and 23:23 to the landline and mobile numbers supplied but of course, it was impossible for Mrs Burt to answer them. No one thought to go back through the digital base unit to offer the basic clinical advice that was needed. I am concerned that both Ambulance Trusts generally as well as Careline companies may not be aware of the potential to save lives using available technology. ”

    Source location

    Derek Thomas Burt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review use of Careline functionality during initial 999 calls to improve communication pathways and maximise available technology.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust recognises the potential benefits of utilising Careline technology to support clinical assessment and the provision of appropriate advice in circumstances where conventional telephone contact is not possible. In addition to the changes already implemented within the clinical callback process, SECAMB is currently reviewing how similar functionality may be utilised by Emergency Medical Advisors at the point of the initial 999 call. This work remains ongoing and no final solution has yet been agreed;”

    Source location

    Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop closer partnership working with Careline providers through the Falls and Frailty Pathways of Care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As outlined elsewhere within this response, the Trust has identified opportunities to strengthen its understanding of the capabilities available through Careline providers and to improve how these capabilities can be utilised within ambulance service operations. This learning has informed broader discussions regarding collaborative working with Careline providers operating within the Trust's footprint.”

    Source location

    Response from South East Coast Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 6 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor relevant call-handling and note-taking technologies and consider their use where they can demonstrably improve outcomes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Concern 6 Appello Careline Limited will continue to monitor developments in relevant technologies, including those relating to call handling and note taking, and will consider their use where they can demonstrably improve outcomes.”

    Source location

    Response from Appello Careline Operations Director
    Page 5 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Share and discuss the PFD learning with the ambulance service medical directors group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “However, within its remit as a membership organisation for UK NHS ambulance services, AACE does share learning from PFDs across the sector. In relation to this specific PFD report, we recognise that the points of concern relate to:”

    Source location

    Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recommend that each ambulance service review local procedures for handling calls from telecare providers and assess three-way calling availability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. We were unaware, at a national level, of the facility for ambulance services to hold three-way conference calls with careline operators and their users. We do consider that the use of this function would be extremely helpful in certain circumstances where there is any ambiguity as to the acuity of the clinical condition of the user / person needing assistance. AACE has shared and discussed this PFD with the ambulance service medical directors group (NASMeD) and have recommended that each ambulance service reviews their own local procedures into handling calls from telecare providers and to establish if their three-way calling is available.”

    Source location

    Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen CPD and learning programmes for QSF-certified organisations, covering records, operator competence, training, decision-support tools, escalation, and information-sharing with emergency services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Opportunities exist to strengthen guidance and operational procedures in these areas to help reduce the risk of similar issues occurring in the future and these will be addressed through future TEC Quality CPD e-learning programme and through strengthened QSF criteria for all certified TEC Monitoring Auditees to ensure the quality of TEC call monitoring and response.”

    Source location

    Response from Telecare Services Association
    Page 8 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The organisation cannot mandate or instruct ambulance services, whose local procedures and implementation decisions remain their responsibility.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “AACE is a private company owned by the English and Welsh Ambulance NHS trusts. It exists to provide ambulance services with a central organisation that supports, co-ordinates and assists with the implementation of nationally agreed policies and guidance. It is a membership organisation representing all UK NHS ambulance services and our primary focus is the ongoing development of ambulance service provision and the improvement of patient care. AACE possess the intellectual property rights of the Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee (JRCALC) UK ambulance service clinical practice guidelines (the “JRCALC guidelines”). AACE is not constituted to mandate or instruct ambulance services; however, it has national influence via the regular meetings of ambulance chief executives and chairs, along with a network of national specialist groups.”

    Source location

    Response from Association of Ambulance Chief Executives
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operational concerns about ambulance care are the responsibility of SECAMB, which is best placed to respond directly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England’s Ambulance Team have reviewed this Report and have advised that the concerns raised relate to operational matters, which are the responsibility of the local ambulance service; SECAMB NHS Foundation Trust, who will be best placed to respond to the concerns raised. We note that SECAMB have also been addressed in your Report and will respond directly to the concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 August 2026

    Open published response
  2. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Ollie Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ollie Lee, who had a history of suicidal thoughts and self-harm, died by suicide on 6 October 2024. The principal concerns were poor communication and engagement between the agencies involved, including failures to share information about self-harm and CAMHS discharge, which resulted in missed opportunities for continued mental health support. Important discussions about Ollie’s preferred name and pronouns were also not recorded or acted upon.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of communication and engagement between agencies involved in Ollie’s care

    Wider context from the report

    “1) Poor communication and engagement between the agencies involved with Ollie including her school, CAMHS and targeted early help. 2) A lack of communication and engagement between targeted early help and CAMHS despite both agencies being aware that the other was involved. This led to a confusing picture and a missed opportunity for Ollie to remain open to CAMHS and receive psycho social intervention and continued support from CAMHS. ”

    Source location

    Ollie Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce named Targeted Early Help link workers and structured consultation routes for every Barnsley school.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within Targeted Early Help, communication with schools has been further strengthened through the introduction of named link workers for each school across the whole of Barnsley, which has created clear and accessible points of contact and a more consistent professional relationship. This has been complemented by more structured consultation opportunities, enabling school staff to routinely seek advice from Targeted Early Help practitioners at the earliest sign of concern. In practice, this means emerging issues relating to attendance, emotional wellbeing or family stressors are shared earlier, discussed jointly and responded to through coordinated planning, reducing delay and preventing escalation.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen Early Help–CAMHS coordination through direct contact, improved referrals, timely information sharing and joint planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In parallel, communication with CAMHS has developed through a more integrated and coordinated approach to emotional health and wellbeing. Targeted Early Help practitioners are now more consistently involved in multi-agency discussions where children present with mental health needs, ensuring that information from CAMHS is understood within the wider family and environmental context. This has been supported by clearer pathways between Early Help and CAMHS, including improved referral processes,”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require multi-agency information gathering and triangulation through updated practice standards and case-management guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These improvements are reinforced through our updated practice standards, which explicitly require practitioners to gather and triangulate information from across the professional network, including education and health partners, rather than relying on a single service perspective. This expectation strengthens professional curiosity and ensures that assessments reflect a comprehensive and multi-agency understanding of the child’s lived experience.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use supervision, case tracking and quality assurance audits to verify multi-agency contact, recording, role clarity and progression of actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our practitioner supervision arrangements provide consistent management oversight of communication, managers routinely check that contact with key partners, including schools and CAMHS, has taken place, that information has been followed up and that actions are clearly recorded and progressed. This ensures that communication is not only expected but evidenced, and that any gaps or delay in information sharing are identified and addressed promptly.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train Targeted Early Help and Children’s Social Care staff in multi-agency working, information sharing, professional curiosity and contextual safeguarding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Practitioner capability has also been strengthened through targeted training and development. Staff across Targeted Early Help and Children’s Social Care have undertaken training focused on multi-agency working, information sharing, professional curiosity and contextual safeguarding. This includes reinforcing expectations around engaging with education and health partners, understanding thresholds for CAMHS involvement, and contributing effectively to multi-agency meetings. This training supports practitioners to communicate with confidence, understand the roles of partner agencies and ensure that information is shared clearly, appropriately and in a timely way.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the preventative, conversational Integrated Front Door model through phased test-and-learn activity, with operation planned by March 2027.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further action is planned through Barnsley’s social care reform and Families First programme. Barnsley has agreed the move towards a preventative, conversational Integrated Front Door model, developed with partners across health, police and education. The model will prioritise professional conversations as the main route for triage and decision-making, with MASH-style safeguarding checks retained where risk is high or unclear. Its purpose is to improve information sharing at first contact, reduce unnecessary hand-offs, support more proportionate decisions and create a clearer single pathway between Family Help, Targeted Early Help, CAMHS and statutory safeguarding. Implementation is planned through phased test-and-learn activity during 2026/27, with the model due to be operational by March 2027.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 8 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete local actions addressing information sharing and multi-agency discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The case note review identified areas of learning local to Barnsley CAMHS, including Information Sharing and Multi Agency Discharge Planning; the clinical quality of the Risk Assessment for Non-Engagement form (RANE); and the associated discharge processes. The local actions were completed by June 2025”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide Barnsley CAMHS training on information sharing and multi-agency working.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having identified local learning from the case note review related to multi-agency communication and engagement, on 4 April 2025, training was provided to Barnsley CAMHS by the Trust Safeguarding Children Team on Information Sharing and Multi-Agency Working. The purpose of the training was to reinforce the importance of multi-agency working and information sharing to promote best practice. The Trust also has a Safeguarding toolkit which supports clinical staff on a range of practice areas including information sharing, and quality and accuracy of documentation.”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train Targeted Early Help practitioners on CAMHS referrals and access to children’s mental health support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having identified learning related to multi agency communication and engagement in the case note review, on 28 January 2025 the Branching Minds Clinical Lead delivered training to Targeted Early Help Practitioners, who are children’s social care employees, in relation to the CAMHS referral process and access to mental health support for children and young people. The purpose of the training was to reinforce the multi-agency arrangements and set a clear expectation that communication between practitioners is active, timely, and accountable. This training is scheduled to be repeated in August 2026. In recognition of potential staff turnover within children’s social care, the Trust will be providing these training sessions annually, supported by additional sessions to be arranged at the request of social care services.”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide annual Targeted Early Help training, with additional sessions arranged at social care’s request.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Having identified learning related to multi agency communication and engagement in the case note review, on 28 January 2025 the Branching Minds Clinical Lead delivered training to Targeted Early Help Practitioners, who are children’s social care employees, in relation to the CAMHS referral process and access to mental health support for children and young people. The purpose of the training was to reinforce the multi-agency arrangements and set a clear expectation that communication between practitioners is active, timely, and accountable. This training is scheduled to be repeated in August 2026. In recognition of potential staff turnover within children’s social care, the Trust will be providing these training sessions annually, supported by additional sessions to be arranged at the request of social care services.”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Meet with Targeted Early Help senior management to explore improved joint working and timely information sharing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On 8 June 2026, the General Manager for Barnsley CAMHS met with the Service Manager for the Targeted Early Help Service (TEHS) to explore opportunities for improving joint working and strengthening timely and effective information sharing between services. To further improve communication between CAMHS and TEHS, three key actions were agreed for initial implementation:”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish daily Targeted Early Help attendance at the Branching Minds briefing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Daily briefing attendance A representative from the Targeted Early Help Service will join the existing daily briefing at Branching Minds. This will enable TEHS to share relevant information about children and young people (CYP) known to their service and facilitate timely consultation with the crisis team where required.”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish fortnightly CAMHS and Targeted Early Help case review meetings for coordinated working.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Fortnightly case review meeting An initial fortnightly meeting will be established between CAMHS and TEHS, attended by a CAMHS Team Manager and a TEHS Team Manager, to review cases awaiting allocation or intervention. This will support information sharing and identify opportunities for coordinated or joint working.”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold bi-monthly strategic reviews of CAMHS and Targeted Early Help joint working and consider developing a Memorandum of Understanding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Bi-monthly strategic review The TEHS Service Manager and the CAMHS General Manager will meet on a bi-monthly basis to review progress, evaluate the effectiveness of joint working arrangements, and consider the development of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). This will be informed by learning from these initial actions.”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider a collaborative Trust and partner-agency response to the Act’s information-sharing provisions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Finally, in April 2026 the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 received royal assent, and this includes the statutory duty for partner agencies to share information relevant to safeguarding and promoting the wellbeing of children and young persons. This statutory duty is intended to apply from September 2026 and national guidance to support its implementation is in consultation process. We are currently considering this within the Trust and with partner agencies to ensure a collaborative and robust response to the information sharing provisions of the Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026.”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce named Targeted Early Help link workers for every Barnsley school and structured consultation opportunities for school staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Within Targeted Early Help, communication with schools has been further strengthened through the introduction of named link workers for each school across the whole of Barnsley, which has created clear and accessible points of contact and a more consistent professional relationship. This has been complemented by more structured consultation opportunities, enabling school staff to routinely seek advice from Targeted Early Help practitioners at the earliest sign of concern. In practice, this means emerging issues relating to attendance, emotional wellbeing or family stressors are shared earlier, discussed jointly and responded to through coordinated planning, reducing delay and preventing escalation.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen Early Help–CAMHS coordination through clearer referral, information-sharing and joint-planning pathways.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In parallel, communication with CAMHS has developed through a more integrated and coordinated approach to emotional health and wellbeing. Targeted Early Help practitioners are now more consistently involved in multi-agency discussions where children present with mental health needs, ensuring that information from CAMHS is understood within the wider family and environmental context. This has been supported by clearer pathways between Early Help and CAMHS, including improved referral processes,”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require practitioners to gather and triangulate information from education, health and other professional partners through updated practice standards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “These improvements are reinforced through our updated practice standards, which explicitly require practitioners to gather and triangulate information from across the professional network, including education and health partners, rather than relying on a single service perspective. This expectation strengthens professional curiosity and ensures that assessments reflect a comprehensive and multi-agency understanding of the child’s lived experience.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use management supervision to check partner contact, follow-up, recording and progression of communication actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our practitioner supervision arrangements provide consistent management oversight of communication, managers routinely check that contact with key partners, including schools and CAMHS, has taken place, that information has been followed up and that actions are clearly recorded and progressed. This ensures that communication is not only expected but evidenced, and that any gaps or delay in information sharing are identified and addressed promptly.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver multi-agency working, information-sharing, professional-curiosity and contextual-safeguarding training for Targeted Early Help and Children’s Social Care staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Practitioner capability has also been strengthened through targeted training and development. Staff across Targeted Early Help and Children’s Social Care have undertaken training focused on multi-agency working, information sharing, professional curiosity and contextual safeguarding. This includes reinforcing expectations around engaging with education and health partners, understanding thresholds for CAMHS involvement, and contributing effectively to multi-agency meetings. This training supports practitioners to communicate with confidence, understand the roles of partner agencies and ensure that information is shared clearly, appropriately and in a timely way.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement updated Multi-Agency Safeguarding Arrangements defining cross-agency information-sharing, accountability, escalation and professional challenge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At a system level, Barnsley’s Multi-Agency Safeguarding Arrangements (MASA) (updated April 2026) provide the framework that underpins this practice, setting clear expectations for timely information sharing, joint working and collective decision-making across all partners. The MASA arrangements strengthen accountability by defining roles and responsibilities between agencies, including education and health, and by supporting effective escalation and professional challenge where communication is not timely or effective.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require direct contact, role clarification, recorded outcomes and ongoing coordination when children are involved with Targeted Early Help and CAMHS.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our current arrangements set a clear expectation that communication between practitioners is active, timely, and accountable. Practitioners are expected to make direct contact, be clear about why it is needed, and ensure that children known to more than one service are not supported through separate or disconnected activity.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 5 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Invite CAMHS practitioners to relevant family, safeguarding and professional meetings, with follow-up and escalation when participation does not occur.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Where CAMHS are actively involved with the child they are invited to family network meetings, child in need meetings, strategy discussions, child protection activity, or other relevant consultations. The right practitioner is identified so that contributions are based on direct knowledge, and where this does not happen, practitioners are expected to follow up and escalate.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 5 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit multi-agency contact, role clarity and recorded communication, feeding gaps into management oversight, supervision and team learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Practice standards, supervision frameworks, and quality assurance activity reinforce the same expectations. Audit work tests whether there is clear evidence of multi-agency contact, role clarity, and recorded communication between services. Where this is not evident, the response includes management oversight, reflective supervision, and feedback into team learning and wider partnership discussion.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 6 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a conversational Integrated Front Door through phased 2026/27 test-and-learn activity, with operation planned by March 2027.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further action is planned through Barnsley’s social care reform and Families First programme. Barnsley has agreed the move towards a preventative, conversational Integrated Front Door model, developed with partners across health, police and education. The model will prioritise professional conversations as the main route for triage and decision-making, with MASH-style safeguarding checks retained where risk is high or unclear. Its purpose is to improve information sharing at first contact, reduce unnecessary hand-offs, support more proportionate decisions and create a clearer single pathway between Family Help, Targeted Early Help, CAMHS and statutory safeguarding. Implementation is planned through phased test-and-learn activity during 2026/27, with the model due to be operational by March 2027.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 9 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce CAMHS co-location within the Integrated Front Door during 2026–2027.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This will be strengthened further through planned CAMHS co-location within the Integrated Front Door during 2026 to 2027. This will support earlier shared discussion, faster information exchange, and better visibility of children whose needs sit across both emotional health and safeguarding systems.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
    Page 7 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adapt escalation protocols so the school contacts the crisis team directly when students self-harm or may harm themselves.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• As a result of CAMHS sharing the crisis flowchart with schools, Barnsley Academy has adapted its protocols around escalating concerns for students who have self-harmed or are deemed to be at risk of harming themselves (including suicidal ideation). Whereas previously, parents or carers would have been advised to take their child to A&E to seek support, school now contacts the crisis team directly.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Community Academy
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use CPOMS profile pinning to identify agencies involved with students and improve communication oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Following the updated guidance from the Department for Education’s Working together to improve school attendance in August 2024 (Appendix 1), school safeguarding leaders updated their approach to ease identification of agencies involved with students via the use of ‘pinning’ on CPOMs profiles. Whilst we recognise that this action was taken prior to Ollie’s death in October 2024, this has supported the ease and efficiency of communication with agencies and has provided a clearer oversight of their involvement for school leaders.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Community Academy
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train safeguarding colleagues to routinely share relevant information with all agencies involved in multi-agency support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Barnsley Academy has completed regular professional development training with all safeguarding trained colleagues (DSLs/DDSLs) within the Academy, including most recently on Thursday 4 June 2026. The focus of the most recent training was around ensuring that where multi-agency support is in place for a student and their family, all relevant information is shared as routine with all agencies involved. Furthermore, particular emphasis was placed upon information sharing across agencies even when other stakeholders (e.g. a parent or Family Support Worker) state that they will share that information (Appendix 2).”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Community Academy
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formalise safeguarding quality assurance guidance covering information-sharing audits and termly complex-case reviews.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In addition to training colleagues, Barnsley Academy has formalised its Safeguarding Quality Assurance and Supervision process guidance (Appendix 3) to ensure that specific reference is made to quality assurance of relevant information sharing across multiple agencies. Within the guidance the Designated Safeguarding Lead completes routine quality assurance audits (Appendix 4) to ensure efficiency and compliance in relation to CPOMs logs and to monitor the effectiveness of multi-agency working. Within the guidance, there is also clear reference made to quality assuring multi-agency working as part of termly complex case file reviews. Whilst the working practices have been in place for much longer, the formal guidance was updated on 5 June 2026 and outlines training commitments as well as quality assurance processes to ensure routine practice and accountability.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Community Academy
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Train seven additional staff in Early Help processes and use an Early Help Practitioner as the school liaison.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Targeted Early Help - Within school, an additional 7 members of staff have received central local authority training around Early Help processes since March 2025. As well as increased capacity to support referral processes, this has further enhanced staff understanding of how targeted early help services work and has made communication more efficient through a strengthening of cross-agency professional relationships and networks. As forementioned, from July 2024, Barnsley Academy has been allocated an Early Help Practitioner within targeted early help services who acts as a direct school liaison and primary point of contact. This has led to more proactive communication and support between early help and school.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Community Academy
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Hold termly Compass Be liaison meetings focused on next steps for identified students with mental health concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mental Health Services - The school has continued to hold link meetings once per term with a school liaison from Compass Be. However, as well as discussing whole school support, these meetings have become more focused to address next steps for specific caseloads of identified students, where mental health concerns have been raised.”

    Source location

    Response from Barnsley Community Academy
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council is the lead agency for the wider Barnsley Children’s Reform Agenda response.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All children’s services, including CAMHS, are involved in the broader Children’s Reform Agenda, which is a comprehensive plan aimed at transforming children’s social care and child protection policy, with a focus on improving multi-agency collaboration and enabling earlier, more effective support for children and families. BMBC are the lead agency of the wider Barnsley children’s services response to the Children’s Reform Agenda, and the Trust are committed to supporting the multi-agency response to the Children’s Reform Agenda. We understand BMBC have included a number of the initiatives, or proposed plans, in their response to the Regulation 28 report.”

    Source location

    Response from South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 17 July 2026

    Open published response
  3. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    DARREN ROBERT DICKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darren Robert Dickson was found unresponsive at home after last being seen on 5 February 2025 and died in hospital on 6 February 2025. Toxicology found benzodiazepine and alcohol, and concerns were raised about incomplete records of information and signposting provided by Recovery Steps, and possible confusion or insufficient communication between Recovery Steps and GP services about benzodiazepine use and doses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure clear communication with GP services about ongoing drug use and doses

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) At the appointment on 27 January 2025, Mr Dickson was given advice to prepare a ‘drugs diary’. This was required so that, at his follow up appointment, it could be ascertained what his usage of benzodiazepine he was, so that a better-informed treatment plan could be prepared. I was conscious of the need your staff have for accurate information as to the extent of the drug use so that a well informed and coherent plan could be put in place. The concern I had was that Mr Dickson had seen his GP prior to the appointment on 27 January 2025 and had been told that if he was to take any benzodiazepine, it should be less than what he had previously taken. I was concerned that there was scope for confusion as to the information being given to Mr Dickson, and the level of communication that Recovery Steps has with the GP services in relation to the issue of ongoing use and doses of drugs. ”

    Source location

    DARREN ROBERT DICKSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Jardine Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jardine Williams, a 29-year-old mental health nurse, died on 24 March 2025 after making a 999 call reporting worsening mental health, suicidal thoughts, a plan and an intention to carry it out. The report raised concerns about unclear and confused communication between the North West Ambulance Service and Cumbria Health on Call, including a delay in returning the call after repeated unsuccessful attempts to contact her. The report did not find a causative link between that delay and the outcome, and stated that her intent could not be determined on the balance of probabilities.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to pass full and accurate information between NWAS and CHOC

    Wider context from the report

    “As outlined above, I heard evidence that Miss Williams had made a 999 call which had been answered by the Northwest Ambulance Service (‘NWAS’) who, in turn passed the information to CHOC. (1) I found that the flow of information and communication between NWAS and CHOC was unclear and at times appeared to be confused. The information passed to CHOC at the outset, following the 999 call, appeared to be limited and may not have provided the receiving handler with the full picture of the situation. I was concerned that full and accurate information was therefore not passing between NWAS and CHOC. (2) Thereafter between 18.14 and 18.54 hours, 4 attempts were made by CHOC to call Miss Williams, but no successful contact was made. At 19.48 hours NWAS called CHOC for an update regarding Miss Williams. I heard evidence that as per the agreed procedure, a third and final attempt at contact would be made. By this stage however four unsuccessful attempts had already been made to contact Miss Williams, and the third attempt to contact her had been made at 18.25hours. I considered that the flow of information between CHOC and NWAS appeared to have confused on this issue. At 20.43 hours a further call was made to CHOC from NWAS for an update on the case, and again it was confirmed that no successful contact had been made with Miss Williams. Therefore, the call was taken back by NWAS approximately 2 hours 18 minutes after the third unsuccessful attempt was made to contact Miss Williams. Thereafter, an ambulance attended Flat 2 Harraby Green Hall at 20.58 hours. I did not find that there was a causative link between the call not being returned to NWAS after the third unsuccessful attempt to contact Miss Williams, and the eventual outcome. I was concerned that, in terms of the procedure, the call should have been returned by CHOC to NWAS after the third failed attempt to contact Miss Williams at 18.25 hours, but that the call was not returned to NWAS by CHOC until 20.43 hours. ”

    Source location

    Jardine Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the incident collaboratively with CHOC’s medical and digital operations leads to identify communication and referral-process learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since this inquest, NWAS’ Mental Health Liaison Lead contacted CHOC to review the incident collectively. This review was undertaken with CHOC’s Medical Director and Digital Operations/Programme Manager. CHOC have acknowledged the evidence already provided by NWAS that the incident should not have been transferred to CHOC due to the identified risk of suicide and that the information provided on this occasion ought to have contained more context. It was also acknowledged by CHOC that, as the incident was categorised as a Category 3 response, it should have been returned by CHOC following the third unsuccessful attempt to make contact, which did not occur.”

    Source location

    Response from Northwest Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 March 2026

    Open published response
  5. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Emma Irene TURNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Emma Irene Turner died at home on 29 January 2023 after her airway became obstructed by vomit following her eating some cake. The report identified concerns about inadequate and untimely multi-agency processes, safeguarding referrals, face-to-face assessments and welfare checks, as well as poor information sharing between services. It also identified a risk that the safeguarding referral form used by GPs could omit key information and delay responses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of connectivity and information sharing between services

    Wider context from the report

    “It is clear that her family cared and supported her but at the inquest the evidence exposed important issues with information sharing between services. Her mother, her carer should have been given more support and assisted in understanding what was in Emma’s best interests. The evidence at the inquest revealed a lack of connectivity between information systems used by different agencies; that impacted on their ability to review how other professionals would intervene in Emma's care. There had been a history of non-attendance and reluctance on the part of family members to engage with services. As a result, safeguarding referrals were made in 2018 by the Day Centre she had attended and in 2019 by a social worker after her discussions with the advanced nurse practitioner at the GP surgery. Although the evidence from the GP surgery, Derby City Council and their safeguarding team confirm that since Emma's death a number of relevant changes were being made to look after patients with learning difficulties particularly where they have not been brought to multiple appointments, in so far as the contents of the present safeguarding referral form which needs to be completed by a GP for vulnerable and learning difficulties adults, that present form is not tailored to the type of concerns that a GP would raise. The safeguarding template questions ask a variety of questions that are not relevant to a GP but to other agencies e.g. care homes, the police and community mental health teams. As a result there is a risk of there being a lack of key information provided to the safeguarding teams. Thus the safeguarding team may be delayed in responding in a timely way. ”

    Source location

    Emma Irene TURNER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Sean Perry WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sean Williams died in the back of a Serco van outside Thames Magistrates’ Court after suffering a fit during transport and then a cardiac arrest. Concerns included gaps in his custody healthcare assessment and treatment, inadequate Serco first-aid training and competence assessment, failure to provide timely first aid, unclear emergency procedures, and insufficient emphasis on preserving life.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide the transport vehicle location to emergency services

    Wider context from the report

    “For the MPS The MPS had already recognised before inquest that, following Mr Williams’ detention, he was not seen by a custody nurse for 23 hours. However, there was another sub optimal element of his care that did not appear to have been identified. The custody nurse who reviewed Mr Williams on two separate occasions in the twelve hours immediately before he attended court, did not on the second occasion take any observations of Mr Williams’ vital signs before (or after) prescribing dihydrocodeine, and did not record any part of Mr Williams’ clinical picture. Despite having prescribed dihydrocodeine for drug withdrawal, when giving evidence in court the nurse was unable to describe the signs and symptoms of withdrawal. For Serco By 18.11 hours, the Serco van that was transporting Mr Williams had returned to the court car park entrance and the driver had got out of the cab and into the back of the van. At that point, neither the escort nor the driver opened the door to Mr Williams’ cell to administer first aid - at the very least to relieve his slumped, squashed position to try to deal with any potential airway obstruction. At 18.15 hours when he stopped showing any signs of life, they still did not open his door. They only opened his door at 18.23 hours, removing him from the cell at 18.24 hours, and administering chest compressions at 18.25 hours. The driver did not press the emergency button in the cab to alert the operations control centre of the situation. The Serco crew did call the London Ambulance Service from the van, but were unable to give the postcode of their location. I put it to the Serco driver that the focus of the two Serco crew members seemed to be on talking to the three other prisoners in their cells, on phone calls, in fact on anything except getting Mr Williams out of his cell to see if the crew could help him. The driver agreed. The Serco driver eventually administered chest compressions but could not face giving rescue breaths. He seemed to have forgotten that he had a face guard hanging from his belt. Despite evidence from Serco that they were satisfied with the first aid training that was given to the two officers, the jury found that: - the Serco first aid training was inadequate; - it did not include a video of a seizure; - it did not sufficiently emphasise the urgency of potentially life saving measures such as use of the recovery position; - the Serco assessment of the first aid knowledge and competence of its staff was inadequate; - Serco failed to provide clear guidance on the emergency button procedures; - Serco’s policy appeared to conflict with its training slides about whether staff should or are even permitted to drive a casualty direct to hospital; - Serco gave insufficient emphasis on urgency and the paramount importance of preserving life. ”

    Source location

    Sean Perry WILLIAMS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Paul Christopher THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Paul Christopher THOMPSON died on 15 July 2024 after moving onto the railway tracks at Elmswell Railway Station and lying in the path of an oncoming freight train. He had a history of suicidal ideation and had been receiving mental health care in custody. The report identified shortcomings in the internal passage of information at HMP Norwich about the release of prisoners receiving mental health care, and in the timely provision of release information to Probation Services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide Probation Services with timely release information

    Wider context from the report

    “The evidence received at Inquest indicated that inadequate arrangements existed at HMP Norwich to provide for the release of prisoners in receipt of mental health care during out of hours periods. In line with procedures in place at HMP Norwich, Mr. Thompson should have been seen by the mental health team treating him so that appropriate arrangements could be put in place for follow up care and treatment in the community. This did not occur. The mental health team treating Mr. Thompson were only made aware of the fact that he had been released when it was mentioned the following day during a general staff briefing. In addition, Mr. Thompson was not given clear information around when to report to Probation Services, nor were Probation Services advised in a timely manner of Mr. Thompson’s release. As a consequence, when Mr. Thompson presented to Durham Probation Office the day after his release (12th July 2024), staff at the Probation Office in Durham had no knowledge of him or the fact of his release. Neither the failure to properly out-process Mr. Thompson from mental health services at HMP Norwich, nor the failure to inform Probation Services in Durham of Mr. Thompson’s release made a material contribution to his death. However, I am concerned that the evidence heard at Mr. Thompson’s Inquest reveals shortcomings in the internal passage of information at HMP Norwich concerning the release of prisoners in receipt of mental health care and treatment, particularly those who have expressed recent suicidal ideation. In addition, I am concerned as to the adequacy of information passage to the Probation Service relating to the release of prisoners from custody. In another case these failures may give rise to a risk of death. ”

    Source location

    Paul Christopher THOMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Compile a telephone list of active contact numbers for each Probation Area in England and Wales.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note for your information that I have tasked my in-house Senior Probation Officer to compile a telephone list of active numbers, one for each Probation Area across England and Wales. This will in future days allow my administrators to supplement any email correspondence with a live call alerting our Probation colleagues to the relevant event. In the case of Mr Paul Thompson a Durham Probation number dialled at or shortly before 5pm was not answered. Clearly the incoming e-mail was not processed through to the Duty Officer before Paul arrived at Framwell House at 10am as directed by his discharge licence from HMP Norwich.”

    Source location

    2026-0066 - Response from HMP Norwich
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The release licence clearly instructed the prisoner when and where to report, and Durham Probation received timely release information at its correct email address.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I attach at Annex B to this correspondence a copy of the licence given to Mr Thompson as part of his discharge procedure from HMP Norwich. It is dated 11th July 2024 and is signed by Paul Thompson.”

    Source location

    2026-0066 - Response from HMP Norwich
    Page 3 · response
    Published 10 February 2026

    Open published response
  8. Northamptonshire

    AI-generated summary

    Wendy Siobhan EYLES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Wendy Siobhan Eyles died aged 55 on 31 October 2024 after being struck by a train at Kettering Station; the inquest concluded that appropriate mental health support and intervention had not been provided. Concerns included the absence of a protocol for patients receiving both private and NHS psychiatric care, risks from poor communication about medication changes, and possible lack of NHS awareness of private psychiatric treatment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate medication changes between private and NHS psychiatric providers

    Wider context from the report

    “One of the findings of the Patient Safety Incident Investigation (PSII) was that ".. there is no protocol for patients open to private and NHS psychiatry at Northamptonshire Healthcare Foundation Trust. The Psychiatrist’s role in patient care is to review and recommend appropriate medication and it is problematic if two Consultants are overseeing this at the same time. It can cause confusion and detriment to the patient if medication changes are not communicated between parties and represents a risk to patient safety... It is notable that CMHT operational managers from across the service differ in their views on the appropriateness of a patient being open to NHS and private services at the same time...". It also emerged at Inquest that a NHS Consultant may not be aware that the patient is also receiving private psychiatry. Where the GP is notified of private psychiatry, it does not trigger a notification to NHS mental health services. Notification of the dual treatment may then be entirely dependent upon the information being shared by the patient. ”

    Source location

    Wendy Siobhan EYLES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga, a four-year-old girl with sickle-cell disease, died in hospital on 4 December 2023 from sepsis resulting from bacterial pneumonia. The report identifies failures to ensure administration of prescribed prophylactic penicillin and failures by doctors to identify her sickle-cell diagnosis during three presentations for respiratory infection as contributory factors.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Breakdown of communication about responsibility for penicillin prescription and dispensation

    Wider context from the report

    “1. As a patient with Sickle Cell Disease, Urielle was prescribed prophylactic penicillin to mitigate the risk of her developing fatal symptoms arising from typical respiratory infections. Urielle’s mother chose not to collect those prescriptions and administer penicillin to Urielle. While specialist doctors believed that her GP was monitoring the prescription and dispensation of the penicillin, whilst Urielle’s GP was misled by Urielle’s mother that the hospital were dispensing the medication directly. The breakdown of communication means that Urielle was left unprotected from opportunistic infection which caused this avoidable death. ”

    Source location

    Urielle Mayila Kuyenga · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Proactively contact patients with sickle cell disease annually for medication reviews, including Penicillin V prescribing and compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Having identified these patients from the Audit, all patients with Sickle Cell Disease are proactively contacted by the practice for a medication review. This includes reviewing Penicillin V prescribing and compliance as a key factor. Completed and Continuing on an annual basis.”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Liaise directly with secondary or tertiary specialists when responsibility for Penicillin V prescribing or dispensing requires clarification.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• If there are any concerns regarding who is taking responsibility for prescribing and dispensing Penicillin V prophylaxis, the practice will directly liaise with the patient’s secondary or”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Move all patients with sickle cell disease to electronic repeat dispensing for Penicillin antibiotics.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All patients with Sickle Cell Disease have had their medications changed to electronic repeat dispensing. This ensures patients can access regular, ongoing supplies of their Penicillin antibiotics from their pharmacy without needing a new prescription from their GP each time. We have also liaised with our on-site pharmacist to ensure that any uncollected prescriptions for Sickle Cell Disease patients are actively communicated back to us at the practice to identify concerns early. Completed and Continuing.”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require the on-site pharmacist to communicate uncollected sickle cell disease prescriptions to the practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All patients with Sickle Cell Disease have had their medications changed to electronic repeat dispensing. This ensures patients can access regular, ongoing supplies of their Penicillin antibiotics from their pharmacy without needing a new prescription from their GP each time. We have also liaised with our on-site pharmacist to ensure that any uncollected prescriptions for Sickle Cell Disease patients are actively communicated back to us at the practice to identify concerns early. Completed and Continuing.”

    Source location

    Response from Maylands Healthcare Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Increase access to shared care records to improve communication between primary and secondary care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the absence of an SCP, clear lines of communication should have been established between Urielle’s specialist in the hospital and GP. The overall responsibility for her care, including monitoring and issuing the prescription, should have remained with the hospital. The government is committed to improving this communication between primary and secondary care as outlined in the 10 Year Health Plan in the section on the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ recommendations. These include work to improve information technology through initiatives such as increasing access to shared care records and developing greater interoperability of electronic patient records (EPRs), starting with the sharing of structured medication information.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop greater interoperability of electronic patient records, starting with structured medication information sharing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the absence of an SCP, clear lines of communication should have been established between Urielle’s specialist in the hospital and GP. The overall responsibility for her care, including monitoring and issuing the prescription, should have remained with the hospital. The government is committed to improving this communication between primary and secondary care as outlined in the 10 Year Health Plan in the section on the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ recommendations. These include work to improve information technology through initiatives such as increasing access to shared care records and developing greater interoperability of electronic patient records (EPRs), starting with the sharing of structured medication information.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Responsibility for addressing the prophylactic penicillin communication concern lies with other bodies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. As a patient with Sickle Cell Disease, Urielle was prescribed prophylactic penicillin to mitigate the risk of her developing fatal symptoms arising from typical respiratory infections. Urielle’s mother chose not to collect those prescriptions and administer penicillin to Urielle. Urielle’s specialist doctors believed that her GP was monitoring the prescription and dispensation of the penicillin, whilst Urielle’s GP was misled by Urielle’s mother that the hospital were dispensing the medication directly. The breakdown of communication means that Urielle was left unprotected from opportunist infection which caused this avoidable death.”

    Source location

    Response from Partnership of East London Co-operatives Ltd
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Without a shared care protocol, the hospital should retain responsibility for care, monitoring and issuing the prescription.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the absence of an SCP, clear lines of communication should have been established between Urielle’s specialist in the hospital and GP. The overall responsibility for her care, including monitoring and issuing the prescription, should have remained with the hospital. The government is committed to improving this communication between primary and secondary care as outlined in the 10 Year Health Plan in the section on the ‘Red Tape Challenge’ recommendations. These include work to improve information technology through initiatives such as increasing access to shared care records and developing greater interoperability of electronic patient records (EPRs), starting with the sharing of structured medication information.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2025

    Open published response
  10. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Hannah Louise Booth · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Hannah Louise Booth, who had been diagnosed with post-natal depression after giving birth in July 2024, drowned in the Goyt River on 6 January 2025 after sending a message evidencing her intention to take her own life. The report identified concerns about information sharing between services, including different record systems, incomplete records, and relevant information about Hannah being recorded only in her baby’s records. Increasing contact about her baby’s development was not shared with perinatal mental health services or recognised as potentially indicating that Hannah was struggling.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of shared policies, guidance and understanding about information relevant for sharing between services

    Wider context from the report

    “This inquest has exposed important issues with information sharing between services and also within services. Those issues are: • Difficulties encountered because different IT systems were being used for record keeping in different services. Essentially a lack of a single patient record. • A lack of a shared understanding of what is relevant information and needs to be made available to other services. • Relevant notes being made in records of baby and not repeated in notes of the mum. Further detail: 1. Sett Valley, the health visitors and perinatal mental health services all had information about Hannah that was potentially relevant to her mental health, but none had the whole picture. It was evident that had those within the perinatal mental health services known about Hannah’s increasing frequency of contact with services about her baby’s development, it would have prompted further contact by them with Hannah and prompted a review of risk and support offered. They did not know and there was no further contact. 2. There was no single electronic patient record accessible to all services. Whilst the perinatal mental health and health visitors used SystmOne, Sett Valley did not. The health visitor had not informed Sett Valley about the contact Hannah had had with them on 27th December so that the GP seeing Hannah on 31st did not know that Hannah was beginning to make increased contact with services about her concerns and did not share any information about that consultation with other services. 3. There was increasing contact with health visitors that was not escalated to or shared with perinatal mental health. The significance of the increased contact, to Hannah’s mental health, did not appear to have been understood. The concerns raised at each contact around her baby’s development were dealt with at face value with exploration and examination of her baby’s development and reassurances given to Hannah regarding the particular concerns raised. The evidence revealed that it was not the individual concerns raised that were relevant to Hannah’s mental health but the fact that she was making more frequent contact which suggested she was struggling. There are no policies, guidance or any shared understanding between services of what might be relevant information to be shared and when. 4. Within both Sett Valley and health visitor records there was potentially important information relevant to Hannah’s mental health recorded only within her baby’s records. At any future appointments concerning Hannah the relevant medical history available on her record would have been incomplete. It also meant that whilst the perinatal mental health services had access to the health visitor notes in relation to Hannah (because they both used SystmOne), even had they had cause to look at Hannah’s notes they would still not have had all relevant information. There are no policies or guidance regarding when information potentially relevant to both mother and baby should be placed in both records or cross referenced. This appears to be particularly important in the perinatal period. ”

    Source location

    Hannah Louise Booth · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the Perinatal Mental Health Service advice line for consultation and proactively share relevant contextual information about patients already receiving its care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During this meeting, it was agreed that the Perinatal Mental Health Service should be utilised by the Health Visiting Service as an advice and consultation resource, in addition to the existing formal referral pathways. Health Visitors are able to contact the Perinatal Mental Health Service advice line to discuss concerns, seek professional advice, or share relevant information without the need to submit a formal referral.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Community Health Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and circulate an infographic explaining the advice line, appropriate use, and information to share, with practical examples for Health Visiting staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support clarity and consistency in practice, the Perinatal Mental Health Service has agreed to develop an infographic for Health Visiting staff. This will provide clear, accessible guidance on:”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Community Health Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update Health Visiting Service standard operating procedures to formalize information-sharing expectations and use of the Perinatal Mental Health Service advice line.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a result of this discussion, the Health Visiting Service is in the process of updating its Standard Operating Procedures to reflect the agreed approach to information sharing and the use of the Perinatal Mental Health Service advice line. This update will provide clear, consistent guidance to staff and reinforce expectations regarding early consultation and sharing of relevant information.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Community Health Service NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add contextual-information-sharing guidance to the electronic referral document for professionals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Information leaflet to GP’s on referral The Perinatal CMHT has drafted an information leaflet for GPs setting out that this Trust and the GP practice use different electronic patient record systems, highlighting the impact of this and detailing risk mitigation. This leaflet will be sent to GPs on receipt of a referral from them if they do not have the same electronic patient record. An additional page has been added to the e-referral document for professionals regarding the sharing of contextual information around the patient. A patient will also be informed that their GP is not on the same electronic patient record so that they too are aware that information sharing is not automatic at the time of their appointment.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss developing guidance with DCHS on when health visitors should cross-reference medical notes for babies and mothers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Working alongside DCHS Further, and in addition, the Trust is currently discussing with Derbyshire Community Health Services NHS FT (‘DCHS’) the development of Guidance regarding when DCHS’ health visitors will cross reference the medical notes for baby and mum.”

    Source location

    Response from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Encourage specialist perinatal mental health teams to include record keeping in training for the wider perinatal pathway.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following this case, NHS England via the regional Perinatal Mental Health networks will encourage specialist perinatal mental health teams to include record keeping as a component of their training to the wider pathway, to help support staff to understand their experiences for documenting assessments, risks, red flags, information sharing and consent.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide providers with guidance on recording information relevant to mother and baby and sharing information about frequent service access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “DDICB is committed to ensuring that providers understand their obligations to share information between providers, where that information relates to the delivery of patient care. We note the coronial concern around the lack of policy or guidance relating to the recording of information potentially relevant to both mother and baby; and guidance relating to information sharing between healthcare providers in the case of a pattern of more frequent access to services.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottingham and Nottinghamshire Integrated Care Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Practice does not consider a policy or guidance on relevant information sharing capable of assisting with this concern.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “her baby’s development and reassurances given to Hannah regarding the particular concerns raised. The evidence revealed that it was not the individual concerns raised that were relevant to Hannah’s mental health but the fact that she was making more frequent contact which suggested she was struggling. There are no policies, guidance or any shared understanding between services of what might be relevant information to be shared and when.”

    Source location

    Response from Sett Valley Medical centre
    Page 4 · response
    Published 15 December 2025

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026