Recurring concern

Unreliable multi-agency communication procedures

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 May 2013•Latest report 16 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of explicitly multi-agency communication procedures that impair the timely, accurate and complete exchange of safety-relevant information between involved agencies, including the anchor's prison-services communication failure.

Not included

  • Excludes generic communication, training, staffing or coordination deficiencies where no explicitly multi-agency communication procedure is identified.
  • Excludes failures confined to a single organisation's internal communication process.
  • Excludes failures of a separately named pathway, system or hazard when that concern provides the more specific supported boundary.
  • Excludes neutral descriptions of multi-agency working without an identified unsafe communication condition.
Reports
134

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
145

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
303

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care17
NHS England17
Ministry of Justice14
HM Prison and Probation Service10
Home Office8
Recipient name withheld6
Metropolitan Police Service5
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives4
East London NHS Foundation Trust4
National Police Chiefs’ Council4
Care Quality Commission3
College of Policing3
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Greater Manchester Police3
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    David John Buttriss · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David John Buttriss died at home on 9 May 2016 after cutting himself during a mental health crisis, despite medical assistance and resuscitation. The report identified communication problems between the GP and mental health services, separate healthcare record systems that limited access to relevant information, and a lack of clarity about the appropriate crisis-response pathway and the roles of different mental health teams.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate relevant patient information between GP and mental health services

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Buttriss had contact with a number of health agencies in the weeks prior to his death including the Community Mental Health, Home Treatment team, GP, Out of Hours GP and Paramedics. It was clear from the evidence at the inquest that • There were Communication issues between the GP and mental health service. The mental health services had requested a patient profile from the GP on 14.5.16 which was not received. The Patient’s GP did not advise mental health services that Mr Buttriss had a mental health history pre-2009 when spoken to following his first self-referral on 14.5.16. It was not known whether this may have affected the decisions the mental health professionals took but it did and meant that his mental health issues were not known to the Cornwall Mental Health Service when they were contacted at the time of crisis • The health care records for the GP and the Mental Health services are held on different health care record systems held by the different healthcare providers. This meant that the GP did not have access to the mental health service records at the time of the consultation on by ████████ on 25th April nor did the mental health workers have information about the appointment with ████████ nor were they aware of the medication issues. The Out of Hours GP, ████████ did not have access to either the mental health or GP records and was in a difficult position when deciding how to deal with Mr Buttriss especially with regards to prescribing and sign posting to mental health professionals when she saw him in acute crisis on the 7th May. • It was clear from the evidence of the Paramedic and ████████ and the parents that there was lack of clarity of the appropriate method or pathway to deal with Mr Butriss on the night of 7th May when he was in crisis. The paramedic did speak to the Home Treatment Team for advice but as Mr Buttriss was reluctant to engage no intervention was made. There appeared to be confusions between the role of the Community Mental Health Service and the Home Treatment Team and the Home Treatment Team Out of Hours provision. ”

    Source location

    David John Buttriss · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an assessment service with designated referral administrators who request a Patient Profile from the GP for every Adult Mental Health Services referral.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has implemented a new assessment service replacing the Single Point of Access to ensure that access to mental health services is consistent and effective. Each locality area now has a designated referral administrator to manage all referrals into Adult Mental Health Services and the administrator requests a copy of the Patient Profile from the patient’s GP for every referral received. Since the implementation of the assessment service some GPs now routinely provide the Patient Profile together with the referral.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Cornwall-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send patients and GPs written assessment outcomes describing the formulation and recommendations, with advice and signposting where secondary services are unsuitable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Once the assessment has taken place and a decision made by the multi-disciplinary team as to the appropriateness for secondary mental health services a letter is sent to the patient and their GP focusing on the formulation and recommendation of the assessment. If the individual is not suitable for secondary services then advice, guidance and signposting is offered.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Cornwall-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a Community Mental Health Nurse Consultant to liaise with GP practices on assessment services, team responsibilities, information sharing and raising concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition ████████, in her new role as Community Mental Health Nurse Consultant, has begun working with a number of local GP practices. This has involved meeting GPs to discuss the new assessment service; the role and remit of Community Mental Health Teams and ways to improve information sharing and raising patients of concern. This is an ongoing piece of work to continue to improve liaison between services.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Cornwall-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work with the National Data Guardian to encourage appropriate information sharing by health and care practitioners.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “NHS England is committed to working with the National Data Guardian to encourage health and care practitioners to share information in the interests of patients. There are clear guidelines that encourage information sharing such as the principles and recommendations published in the 2013 review of information governance in the health and care system (“To Share or Not to Share”¹). This report was conducted by Dame Fiona Caldicott who has since been appointed to be the National Data Guardian.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lead the Global Digital Exemplar programme to improve electronic record sharing and disseminate digital information-sharing learning across NHS trusts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise that there are many challenges across the NHS to support secure data and record sharing, and we are actively leading a number of initiatives to address this. For example, the Global Digital Exemplar (“GDE”) programme, led”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Support Local Health and Care Record Exemplars to establish safe, integrated access to permitted patient information across health and care organisations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, NHS England is working with a number of Local Health and Care Record Exemplars to support the provision of safe integrated care across health and care settings. The aim will be to establish a local record for authorised staff in different organisations to access permitted information about a patient’s history of contact with the NHS and related care services. This may include information from ‘physical health checks’ for people with serious mental illness which NHS England is encouraging a greater take up of. We have made progress on this with around 60 local information sharing initiatives underway, each aiming to share information across organisations – such as GP, Acute and Social Care settings – and across geographies as the patient moves.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Written confirmation of assessment outcomes to GPs and ongoing liaison are considered sufficient for communication about referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “From the Trust’s perspective the outcome of an assessment with Adult Mental Health Services is confirmed in writing to GPs and on-going liaison work with GPs will also improve communication and information sharing.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Cornwall-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Some information-sharing recommendations were beyond Devon Doctors’ control.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dr Eggleton notes that some of your recommendations regarding information sharing are beyond the control of Devon Doctors but he is assured that our clinicians are able to make accurate assessments regarding risk, to the patient and others, and they have appropriate pathways to escalate their concerns to local mental health services. In reality this often means the patient is referred to ED to see the liaison psychiatrist team, since mental health assessments in the home environment are even more difficult to arrange out of hours than they are in hours.”

    Source location

    2018-0010-Response-by-Devon-Doctors
    Page 1 · response
    Published 7 March 2018

    Open published response
  2. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Robert John Richards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert John Richards died by suicide after being found hanging by a sheet in his cell at HMP Wandsworth on 29 July 2014. The report identified concerns about bullying, extortion, inadequate risk management and communication, unsuitable cell allocation, staffing and training, and failings in resuscitation equipment and procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate communication between healthcare, psychological, psychiatric and prison staff

    Wider context from the report

    “7. That the communications interface between the medical staff, those supplying psychological support and psychiatric services needs to be improved, as does the communication of these staff with prison officers, such that risks of self harm and bullying are appropriately communicated and acted upon. ”

    Source location

    Robert John Richards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Ruth Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ruth Thompson became unwell in Italy on 14 April 2017 after suffering a dissecting aortic aneurysm and underwent surgery, but subsequently sustained a pontine brain infarction and developed pressure sores during prolonged immobility. She was repatriated to the United Kingdom, entered end-of-life care on 30 May 2017, and died on 31 May 2017. The substantive concerns included inadequate communication and transfer documentation, lack of proper or informed consent, and insufficient clinical information being provided to UK clinicians, causing delay and uncertainty in treatment and care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate vital transfer information to patients, families and receiving clinicians

    Wider context from the report

    “2. On her transfer to the United Kingdom, clinicians within the Accident & Emergency Department at the Royal Bolton Hospital were only supplied with two sheets of information from the hospital, written in Italian, which required doctors to use Google Translate, written attempt to interpret that document. The documentation was inadequate and not fit for purpose in that it failed to note or provide basic handover information including:- a. Operative details; b. Interventional treatment and observations; c. Ongoing prescribed medication; d. Recent test results; e. Identification of investigative procedures and their results; f. Treatment plan following discharge; 3. Accordingly, the issue of adequacy of communication of vital information to the deceased, her next of kin and treating clinicians in the United Kingdom following air ambulance transfer from abroad created delay and uncertainty in treatment and care. ”

    Source location

    Ruth Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. South London

    AI-generated summary

    Jeremiah Obaka · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jeremiah Obaka, who was 77 and had several medical conditions including chronic lymphoid leukaemia, was found dead at home on 2 July 2016 after carers received no reply on subsequent visits following their last visit on 27 June 2016. The principal concern was that there was no agreed, consistent policy or guideline for responding when a service user did not reply or could not be found, and the local authority and care agency had different guidelines that had not been communicated to each other.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate guidelines between the local authority and care agency

    Wider context from the report

    “There was no agreed and consistent policy or guideline on what should happen in the event that a service user did not reply or could not be found. The local authority (now through a separate Limited company) and the care agency had separate and different guidelines, neither of which had been communicated to the other. ”

    Source location

    Jeremiah Obaka · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Derby and Derbyshire

    AI-generated summary

    Barbara Christine Sturgess · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barbara Christine Sturgess, who had advanced dementia and was at high risk of falls, sustained a cervical spinal fracture in a fall at her nursing home on 20 May 2017 and died of bronchopneumonia on 8 June 2017. The hospital did not initially inform the nursing home or GP practice of the fracture or necessary care measures; although this was not evidenced to have contributed to her death, it had the potential to adversely affect her wellbeing and could contribute to death in similar cases.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate confirmed fractures and necessary care measures to relevant care providers

    Wider context from the report

    “The Chesterfield Royal Hospital did not inform the nursing home or the GP practice that Barbara Christine Sturgess had sustained a cervical spinal fracture nor of any necessary measures in her care and treatment. Her daughter attended a fracture clinic appointment with her on 24 May 2017 where a Doctor told the daughter that a fracture had been sustained and that care should be exercised in her management on account of the fracture. It was only on 26 May 2017, as a result of enquiries by the nursing home, that formal confirmation of the fracture was provided by the hospital. Although there was no evidence that the failure of the hospital to properly confirm and advise on the fracture was a factor in Barbara Christine Sturgess’s death this did have the potential to adversely affect her wellbeing. Very importantly if there were to be further similar failings in communication it could be that for some patients this could be a contributory factor in death. ”

    Source location

    Barbara Christine Sturgess · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Percy Jacks · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Percy Jacks died from a pulmonary embolus after being found unresponsive the morning following treatment for chest pain. The report identified failings in the management of his anticoagulation medication, including poor communication between the hospital, GP surgery and care home, and inadequate systems for ensuring the medication continued for the intended period.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fragile communication system between GP, hospital and care home

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Overall the evidence revealed a very fragile system of communication between GP hospital and care home in circumstances in which the deceased had moved between three care homes in a short period of time. ”

    Source location

    Percy Jacks · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Undertake a review of discharge arrangements, focusing on communication and documentation supporting discharge from secondary to primary healthcare.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HIW has noted the findings of the inquest and assure you that this information will be used to inform our work. HIW is currently undertaking a review of discharge arrangements focusing on communication and the quality of documentation used to support patient discharge from secondary to primary healthcare. I can confirm that this report has been shared with the review lead to consider.”

    Source location

    2017-0329-Response-by-Welsh-Government
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss with CSSIW how to collaborate and jointly address fragile communication between health services and the care home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note the concerns raised by the report regarding fragile communication between health services and the care home and will discuss further with CSSIW how we may seek to collaborate and address this issue jointly through our work.”

    Source location

    2017-0329-Response-by-Welsh-Government
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Fast-track medical records for new patients registering at nursing or care homes so doctors receive prior medical history promptly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have discussed this in our practice meeting and have made the following changes.”

    Source location

    2017-0329-Response-by-Rhayader-Group-Practic
    Page 1 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review how inspections assess timely information transfer between services, using policy, medicines and clinical expertise.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a result of the concerns being brought to our attention we have taken the opportunity to review how CQC checks that information about patients being transferred between services happens in a timely manner and whether there is any more we as a regulator can do to prevent an incident such as this from happening in future.”

    Source location

    2017-0329-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 6 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and improve the wording of the Key Lines of Enquiry on information sharing during transfers between services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have revised and improved the wording of our Key Lines of Enquiry and from November 2017 inspectors will be considering the following two specific questions when they are reviewing the safety of a practice, instead of one being a prompt supporting the other: ‘When people move between teams, services and organisations (which may include at referral, discharge, transfer and transition), is all the information needed for their ongoing care shared appropriately, in a timely way and in line with relevant protocols?’ and ‘How well do the systems that manage information about people who use services support staff, carers and partner agencies to deliver safe care and treatment? (This includes coordination between different electronic and paper-based systems and appropriate access for staff to records.)’”

    Source location

    2017-0329-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have inspectors use two specific information-sharing questions when reviewing practice safety from November 2017.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have revised and improved the wording of our Key Lines of Enquiry and from November 2017 inspectors will be considering the following two specific questions when they are reviewing the safety of a practice, instead of one being a prompt supporting the other: ‘When people move between teams, services and organisations (which may include at referral, discharge, transfer and transition), is all the information needed for their ongoing care shared appropriately, in a timely way and in line with relevant protocols?’ and ‘How well do the systems that manage information about people who use services support staff, carers and partner agencies to deliver safe care and treatment? (This includes coordination between different electronic and paper-based systems and appropriate access for staff to records.)’”

    Source location

    2017-0329-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 4 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Current inspection methodology was considered to cover the relevant care elements, so no additional policy change was required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a result of the concerns being brought to our attention we have taken the opportunity to review how CQC checks that information about patients being transferred between services happens in a timely manner and whether there is any more we as a regulator can do to prevent an incident such as this from happening in future.”

    Source location

    2017-0329-Response-by-Care-Quality-Commission
    Page 6 · response
    Published 2 December 2017

    Open published response
  7. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Dominic Michael WHITE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dominic White, who had bipolar affective disorder and psychosis, rapidly deteriorated over several days and was assessed as requiring detention under section 2 of the Mental Health Act. Before he could be conveyed to a mental health hospital, he left the emergency unit and was found the following day at an electricity substation with injuries consistent with a fall from height. The concerns included whether mental health observation levels were communicated effectively and the clinical decision-making involved in allowing him to leave after detention had been decided.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that all relevant personnel are aware of the patient’s mental health observation level

    Wider context from the report

    “1. I heard that, following Mr White’s death, the level of (mental health) observations of a patient at the Whittington Hospital Emergency Unit is now clearly documented. However, I am not sure that there is yet a robust protocol in place to ensure that all relevant personnel (Whittington EU doctors, nurses and security officers; also visiting independent s12 doctors, BEH and C&I staff) are aware of the level. My concern arises because sometimes, when anyone can look at a record, that nobody actually does. ”

    Source location

    Dominic Michael WHITE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update mental health policies and the joint observation protocol to define roles, responsibilities and decision-making case studies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We set out below our agreed approach for ensuring that all relevant personnel are aware of a mental health patient’s level of observation. In order to address both concerns identified in the PFD, the Whittington and Camden & Islington have reviewed their mental health policies. These are being updated to ensure the roles and responsibilities are explicit and will also include case studies to assist in decision making. This will be included in Camden & Islington NHS Foundation Trust’s Mental Health Liaison Operational Policy and the Whittington Health NHS policy for mental health patients in the Emergency Department which is currently being updated.”

    Source location

    2017-0177-Response-by-Whittington-Hospital-NHS2-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display Emergency Department signage showing the observation process and responsible nursing and special-staff assignments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. As part of improving communication between organisations signage has been introduced in Whittington ED, which is prominently placed around the nurses’ station, to ensure that visiting doctors and AMHPs are aware of this process and that the name of the patient’s allocated nurse and any 1:1 or ‘special’ staff member is visible outside the patient’s cubicle (see images).”

    Source location

    2017-0177-Response-by-Whittington-Hospital-NHS2-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct five daily senior-staff situation reports and follow-up reviews covering mental health patients’ risks, observation compliance, care quality and confirmed plans.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “8. To ensure that the level of observations is being complied with and that the clinical decision making regarding Mental Health patients is robust Senior Whittington ED staff members (nurse in charge, site team, ED registrar or consultant) conduct a situation report 5 times per day in which the status of the department including”

    Source location

    2017-0177-Response-by-Whittington-Hospital-NHS2-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response
  8. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Christiana Pelle · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christiana Pelle developed a grade 4 sacral pressure ulcer while living at home under the care of community nursing and a planned care package. The ulcer became infected, and she later died in hospital after contracting pneumonia while receiving inpatient treatment. The principal concerns were unclear guidance about when nurses should involve a GP and inadequate systems for sharing information and escalating concerns between community nursing, other agencies, and the care provider.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clearly understood system for communicating concerns and relevant information between the Community District Nurses Team and a community patient’s care provider agency

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The lack of a clearly understood system for communicating concerns and/or other relevant information between the Community District Nurses Team and the care provider agency for a community patient. ”

    Source location

    Christiana Pelle · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Gloucestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Shane Dean Hardy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Shane Dean Hardy, a 29-year-old man with a history of substance misuse and involvement with mental health services, died after placing a belt around his neck and being found hanging from a tree on 8 March 2017. The report raised concerns that people with addiction and mental health difficulties can fall between services, and that agencies supporting an individual may not share information or identify a lead agency for communication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of information sharing between agencies providing support services

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) When multiple agencies are involved in providing support services to an individual, there can be a lack of information sharing between those agencies. No agency is identified as the lead agency for communication purposes. ”

    Source location

    Shane Dean Hardy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify a lead agency for communication

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) When multiple agencies are involved in providing support services to an individual, there can be a lack of information sharing between those agencies. No agency is identified as the lead agency for communication purposes. ”

    Source location

    Shane Dean Hardy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Charles Ray Woodward · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Charles Ray Woodward underwent surgery to remove a sigmoid colon tumour and was discharged home after an apparently uneventful recovery. His health then declined, and he died from peritonitis caused by a leaking anastomosis following surgery. The principal concerns were inadequate communication and liaison between the hospital, community care providers and the family, together with insufficiently robust monitoring of his condition after discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate communication and liaison between hospital and community care providers after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “There was inadequate communication and liaison between the hospital on the one hand and on the other hand the deceased’s GP practice and district nurses in the community who, following the deceased’s discharge from hospital, would be responsible for the deceased’s ongoing care. Further, monitoring of the deceased’s condition from Leighton Hospital was insufficiently robust and relied upon oral contact rather than ensuring the physical presence of a medical attendant, be that attendant hospital or community based. The evidence suggested that there was miscommunication between the hospital and the deceased’s family with the result that the deceased’s worrying decline in health was not appreciated by the hospital. ”

    Source location

    Charles Ray Woodward · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026