Recurring concern

Unreliable emergency response to patient collapse

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 16 Dec 2013•Latest report 26 May 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in the dedicated emergency-response process for a collapsed patient, including response guidance and policies, staff training and familiarity with emergency systems, recognition and escalation, emergency equipment use, attendance, positioning and resuscitation actions.

Not included

  • Excludes generic emergency-response or resuscitation deficiencies where patient collapse is not the identified operational context.
  • Excludes failures limited to later hospital treatment, admission or post-resuscitation care after the immediate collapse response was adequate.
  • Excludes generic staffing, communication or documentation deficiencies unless they directly impair the emergency response to patient collapse.
  • Excludes condition-specific emergency systems, such as Code Blue or agonal-breathing recognition, when that named system provides the more specific supported parent boundary.
  • Excludes the occurrence or outcome of a collapse where no deficiency in the dedicated response process is identified.
Reports
33

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
47

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
77

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

East London NHS Foundation Trust3
Ministry of Justice3
NHS England3
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust2
Department of Health and Social Care2
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust2
HM Prison and Probation Service2
Metropolitan Police Service2
Aspray House1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Broadmoor Hospital1
Bupa Care Homes (GL) Limited1
Caremark (Chiltern & Three Rivers)1
Care Quality Commission1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Jake Edmund Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jake Edmund Lee suffered a spinal cord infarction causing loss of feeling and immobility below the waist. After he collapsed at a rehabilitation unit, CPR was not commenced promptly, and the nurse in charge left him in the care of an untrained healthcare assistant while making another call. The principal concerns were the nurse’s lack of training and ability to respond to a collapse, her failure to remain with the patient, and her lack of knowledge about the bed and appropriate CPR and airway procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training and experience to deal with patient arrest or collapse

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Inability, lack of training/experience of nurse in charge to deal with an arrest/collapse of a patient. Clear panic in the face of an emergency. (2) Nurse leaving collapsed patient in care of untrained HCA whilst she made an unnecessary second phone call, she denied that there was a phone she could have used in his room. (3) Her lack of knowledge about the special bed which Mr Lee had, which allowed CPR on the bed and her stating that she put Mr Lee into the recovery position when he was semi recumbent, she did not flatten the bed and she did not do a mouth sweep to see if his airway was occluded by his tongue. ”

    Source location

    Jake Edmund Lee · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. London (West)

    AI-generated summary

    Amir Siman-Tov · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Amir Siman-Tov died at Colnbrook Immigration Removal Centre on 17 February 2016 after taking an overdose of codeine. The concerns included inconsistent involvement of healthcare staff in the ACDT self-harm reduction process, inconsistent medication checks, inadequate hospital discharge information and handover, insufficient monitoring after his return, and shortcomings in the emergency response.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to position an unresponsive patient on the floor for effective resuscitation

    Wider context from the report

    “13. Nursing and other staff arrived. A custody officer asked the nurse if Mr Siman-Tov should be moved to the floor for resuscitation. The nurse replied no. Dr Harris, an expert in Emergency Medicine said that he should have been moved to the floor for effective resuscitation. This puts detainees at risk. ”

    Source location

    Amir Siman-Tov · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. East Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Martin Leslie Haines · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Leslie Haines was detained at Lewes Prison and was found dead in his cell on 18 March 2018. He had Type II Diabetes and warning signs of cerebrovascular disease, but the appropriate diagnostic tests were not carried out; alcohol, Venlafaxine and Amitriptyline were later found in his system and considered by the pathologist to have contributed to his death. The principal concerns included inadequate diabetes and cardiovascular monitoring, healthcare falling below community standards, the ability to brew or distil alcohol in prison, a lack of protocols for responding to an unresponsive body, and insufficient communication between healthcare providers and the prison service.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of protocols or agreements for responding to an unresponsive body

    Wider context from the report

    “(4) There were no protocols or agreements between healthcare staff and the prison service as to how best to respond to an unresponsive body. ”

    Source location

    Martin Leslie Haines · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display control-room reminders and regularly issue staff notices requiring correct use of emergency codes and immediate ambulance calls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your fourth concern relates to the lack of a protocol between prison and healthcare staff as to how best to respond to an unresponsive body. In accordance with Prison Service Instruction 03/2013, all prisons are required to have in place a two-code medical emergency response system and, when used correctly, these codes should trigger the control room to call an ambulance and for healthcare staff to attend the scene with the appropriate emergency equipment. You may recall from evidence heard at the inquest that a notice is now displayed in the control room to serve as a visual reminder to staff of the need to call an ambulance immediately upon receiving an emergency code. The prison also issues notices to all staff regularly to remind them of the importance of using the emergency codes correctly.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 August 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The existing two-code medical emergency response system and staff reminders address responses to unresponsive bodies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Your fourth concern relates to the lack of a protocol between prison and healthcare staff as to how best to respond to an unresponsive body. In accordance with Prison Service Instruction 03/2013, all prisons are required to have in place a two-code medical emergency response system and, when used correctly, these codes should trigger the control room to call an ambulance and for healthcare staff to attend the scene with the appropriate emergency equipment. You may recall from evidence heard at the inquest that a notice is now displayed in the control room to serve as a visual reminder to staff of the need to call an ambulance immediately upon receiving an emergency code. The prison also issues notices to all staff regularly to remind them of the importance of using the emergency codes correctly.”

    Source location

    Response from HM Prison and Probation Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 16 August 2019

    Open published response
  4. Exeter and Greater Devon

    AI-generated summary

    James Aran Spencer · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Aran Spencer died from multiple drug toxicity after self-injecting illegal street drugs following a prolonged period of abstinence. He was found in a drug-related collapse, but a support officer did not seek emergency medical assistance, and the report raised concerns about inadequate first-aid, drug-awareness and mandatory training for staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide mandatory induction training for support officers responding to drug-related collapse

    Wider context from the report

    “The deceased was found in a classic posture of drug-related collapse, but no action was taken due to inadequate training – “mandatory training” had not been given at the time of induction. Support officers working in this role will be likely to encounter this type of situation in a vulnerable population of recently released prisoners, and it is well recognised that the user's tolerance will have decreased after a period of withdrawal and therefore the risk of death significantly increases. The induction policy, the quality of induction of staff and ongoing training updates should all be considered to ensure better awareness of officers, and better safety for residents. ”

    Source location

    James Aran Spencer · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review drug awareness training delivered to BASS contract colleagues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since this unfortunate incident, and due to the concerns identified within the Regulation 28 report, the drug training delivered to colleagues working on the BASS contract has been fully reviewed. Drug awareness training is now delivered to all new operational colleagues working on the BASS contract as part of their mandatory training programme. Furthermore we have also rolled this training out to existing operational colleagues by way of "refresher" training, ensuring that all colleagues will receive this training.”

    Source location

    James-Spencer-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 March 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver mandatory drug awareness training to new BASS operational colleagues and refresher training to existing colleagues.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since this unfortunate incident, and due to the concerns identified within the Regulation 28 report, the drug training delivered to colleagues working on the BASS contract has been fully reviewed. Drug awareness training is now delivered to all new operational colleagues working on the BASS contract as part of their mandatory training programme. Furthermore we have also rolled this training out to existing operational colleagues by way of "refresher" training, ensuring that all colleagues will receive this training.”

    Source location

    James-Spencer-Response
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 March 2017

    Open published response
  5. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Susan Sian JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Susan Sian Jones suffered a cardiorespiratory arrest at Hornsey Police station while waiting to make a statement about an allegation of historical sexual assault. At inquest, the jury concluded that her death resulted from methadone and alcohol intoxication together with inadequate police policies, procedures and training. The report identified a lack of specific protocol or training for monitoring members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to treat an unresponsive individual as a medical emergency

    Wider context from the report

    “I heard evidence at inquest that there is no specific protocol or training regarding the monitoring of members of the public in police stations who are not in police custody. This was acknowledged by the Metropolitan Police Service to be a gap. In seeking to plug this gap by way of policy development, it may be helpful for you to consider the following. • Snoring is not always a reassuring sign and may indicate a partial airway obstruction. A partial airway obstruction can be life threatening. • In considering whether snoring is sign for concern, the fact of intoxication by alcohol or drugs or both – even if the individual is capable – is highly relevant. In addition, officers should bear in mind that members of the public sometimes lie about alcohol or drug taking, even when there seems no obvious reason to lie. • Any relevant information gleaned by officers, for example that an individual is a methadone user, should be passed on to colleagues with responsibility (and preferably recorded in some way or other). • The only way of determining whether snoring is benign is by rousing, most particularly by waking the individual and determining whether they are able to sit up and hold a conversation. • The rousing itself may have a therapeutic purpose even over and above its value as a tool of assessment. And an unresponsive individual must be treated as a medical emergency. • All police officers and staff should know the location of the nearest defibrillator. If they are attending a police station for the first time, they should make themselves aware of its location. In terms of feedback regarding officer training generally and for the officer who led this resuscitation attempt, I should also point out that after Ms Jones’s cardiorespiratory arrest, the cardiopulmonary resuscitation given was later noted by a paramedic to be extremely effective. ”

    Source location

    Susan Sian JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Sydney Mya Neil · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sydney Mya Neil suffered from severe brittle asthma and died at Birmingham Children's Hospital after collapsing at a GP surgery following breathing difficulties. The report raised concerns about inadequate ventilation, lack of suction and lack of oxygen during resuscitation, and whether GP practices have sufficient expertise and equipment for emergencies.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient emergency equipment in GP practices

    Wider context from the report

    “Once Sydney collapsed in the GP surgery there was inadequate ventilation for 8 minutes. No suction was used nor was oxygen provided. I am concerned about the level of expertise in GP practices when resuscitation is required and whether they have sufficient equipment to deal with emergency situations. ”

    Source location

    Sydney Mya Neil · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ask the CQC to ensure inspections check that primary care services have equipment and skills to address respiratory emergencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I have asked ████████ Head of Primary Care Commissioning, NHS”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide defibrillator, oxygen, oximeter and recommended CPR equipment for managing medical emergencies in the practice.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It suggests agreed principles for defibrillators, oxygen and oximeters (attachment 3). We have these at the practice.”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Wychall-Lane-Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct contract visits to ensure GP practices adhere to emergency equipment, training and protocol guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All organisations providing primary care should also have appropriate equipment and drugs for managing other life-threatening emergencies (e.g. anaphylaxis). The CCG would expect all GP staff to be trained to deliver basic CPR to patients, to have this training updated on a regular basis and have appropriate protocols in place to deal with such emergencies. The CCG has a programme of contract visits where we will ensure that practices are adhering to the guidance provided above”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Birmingham-South-Central-Clinical-Commissioning-Group
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assist the practice involved in the incident to identify and address issues highlighted by the incident.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CCG has been assisting the practice involved in this incident to identify and address issues that have been highlighted by this unfortunate incident and it is the intention of the CCG to circulate any learning from this incident across all GP practices that we are responsible for commissioning. We will also circulate this learning to surrounding CCGs so that they may also disseminate these lessons to their practices.”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Birmingham-South-Central-Clinical-Commissioning-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate learning from the incident to all commissioned GP practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CCG has been assisting the practice involved in this incident to identify and address issues that have been highlighted by this unfortunate incident and it is the intention of the CCG to circulate any learning from this incident across all GP practices that we are responsible for commissioning. We will also circulate this learning to surrounding CCGs so that they may also disseminate these lessons to their practices.”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Birmingham-South-Central-Clinical-Commissioning-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Circulate incident learning to surrounding clinical commissioning groups for dissemination to their practices.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CCG has been assisting the practice involved in this incident to identify and address issues that have been highlighted by this unfortunate incident and it is the intention of the CCG to circulate any learning from this incident across all GP practices that we are responsible for commissioning. We will also circulate this learning to surrounding CCGs so that they may also disseminate these lessons to their practices.”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Birmingham-South-Central-Clinical-Commissioning-Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Except in remote or inaccessible locations, practices may rely on rapid access to emergency services when determining appropriate equipment and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Care Quality Commission (CQC) as the regulator of general practice needs to be assured that practices are able to immediately respond to the needs of a person who becomes seriously ill. The CQC does not have explicit guidance around emergency equipment; however does state that if the practice does not have oxygen they are unlikely to be able to demonstrate they are equipped for dealing with emergencies.²”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The CQC is responsible for using its inspection regime to ensure primary care services carry necessary equipment and skills for respiratory emergencies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Care Quality Commission (CQC) as the regulator of general practice needs to be assured that practices are able to immediately respond to the needs of a person who becomes seriously ill. The CQC does not have explicit guidance around emergency equipment; however does state that if the practice does not have oxygen they are unlikely to be able to demonstrate they are equipped for dealing with emergencies.²”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-NHS-England
    Page 3 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    General practice is not an emergency service and is not contracted, equipped or organised to deliver team-based emergency care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have taken advice from the Local Medical Committee and General Practice Committee (GPC) of the BMA who commissioned ████████ who is a senior GP who has held roles including provision of and teaching of immediate care, now known as Pre-Hospital Emergency Medicine and is chair of BASICS Education Ltd, who aim to improve emergency care outside hospital, to comment on the care the Practice provided to Miss Neil and provide his general thoughts on this incident. He states general practice and general practitioners are not an emergency service…… General practitioners who very, very infrequently have to deal with life threatening emergencies and are neither equipped, contracted nor organised to deliver such team based emergency care.”

    Source location

    2016-0256-Response-by-Wychall-Lane-Surgery
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 July 2016

    Open published response
  7. Berkshire

    AI-generated summary

    Christopher Harold Brand · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Christopher Harold Brand, a 53-year-old patient at Broadmoor Hospital, became unresponsive after returning from treatment at Frimley Park Hospital and could not be revived despite resuscitation attempts. Concerns included failures to follow observation procedures, failure to check that he was alive when his room was unlocked, and a delay in starting CPR.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in commencing CPR for unresponsive patients

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There were periods during the observation of Mr Brand by nursing staff where the hospital observation policy was not followed correctly. In particular, one nurse gave evidence that he saw no movement from Mr Brand after 06.50 hours for some 40-50 minutes. His view of Mr Brand was obscured by poor lighting in the room, scratches to the observation window through which he was observing Mr Brand and by the position in which Mr Brand was lying under heavy bedding. He made no effort to ensure that Mr Brand was safe and well, in line with the policy. (2) When the door to Mr Brand’s room was unlocked at 07.15 on 1st July 2015, no attempt was made to check that he was alive and well in breach of the policy at the time. At least a further 10 minutes passed before it was realised that Mr Brand had not moved and checks revealed him to be unresponsive. (3) Having found Mr Brand to be unresponsive, nursing staff did not immediately begin CPR. The evidence shows that it was only the 4th member of staff attending Mr Brand who commenced CPR and there was a delay while the first staff on the scene called for more senior assistance. (4) While the failure to follow hospital policy may not have directly impacted upon the circumstances of Mr Brand’s death, the nature of the breaches are so fundamental that they could be the difference between life and death of a patient on future occasions. ”

    Source location

    Christopher Harold Brand · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Redesign basic life support and automated defibrillator training around realistic ward-based emergencies and required resuscitation procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following Mr Brand’s death, the basic life support and automated defibrillator training course was redesigned. It now takes place on ward environments where emergencies are recreated to mimic realistic ward situations, enabling staff to better transfer their skills. It incorporates the in-hospital resuscitation procedures designed by the Resuscitation Council (UK), which in turn is accredited by NICE. Each attendee has the opportunity to perform all stages of the sequences of action required to support the collapsed patient. In keeping with the inquest findings (and recommendations of the Resuscitation Council) the requirement for immediate action and subsequent medical and managerial leadership of the resuscitation process is emphasised. Positive feedback has been obtained from course attendees. For staff expected to complete this course, there is currently 87% compliance.”

    Source location

    2016-0154-Response-by-West-London-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 April 2016

    Open published response
  8. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    FIONA MARGARET PATRICIA LEWIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Fiona Margaret Patricia Lewis was admitted to Ipswich Hospital after three weeks of symptoms and died there on 13 September 2014. The cause of death was found to be disseminated carcinoma, with no primary mass identified at post-mortem examination. Concerns were raised about delayed resuscitation following her collapse and whether the healthcare professionals involved had adequate resuscitation knowledge and ability, although it was considered unlikely that this would have altered the outcome.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate resuscitation training for health care professionals involved in patient care

    Wider context from the report

    “Although, in the very sad circumstances of the death of Fiona Luis, any problems in respect of resuscitation at the time of the collapse are unlikely to have affected the outcome for the reasons given above, it is clearly important that there is confidence that health care professionals involved with patient care are adequately trained in resuscitation and able to respond appropriately in the event of a collapse occurring. ”

    Source location

    FIONA MARGARET PATRICIA LEWIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of health care professionals involved in patient care to respond appropriately to collapse

    Wider context from the report

    “Although, in the very sad circumstances of the death of Fiona Luis, any problems in respect of resuscitation at the time of the collapse are unlikely to have affected the outcome for the reasons given above, it is clearly important that there is confidence that health care professionals involved with patient care are adequately trained in resuscitation and able to respond appropriately in the event of a collapse occurring. ”

    Source location

    FIONA MARGARET PATRICIA LEWIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    ANTHONY STEPHEN CLEVELAND · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anthony Stephen Cleveland collapsed after exercising unsupervised at a gym on 11 June 2013 and died some days later in intensive care following a cardiac arrest and hypoxic injury associated with severe coronary artery stenosis. Concerns included inadequate supervision and resuscitation, inadequate risk assessment, a lack of qualified first aiders, and the absence of formalised national guidance for risk assessment in fitness centres and gyms.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate resuscitation attempts following collapse

    Wider context from the report

    “It is possible and entirely foreseeable that significant medical problems may arise in an environment where people are exercising and may have underlying medical problems that could predispose them to collapse. Given the severity of the underlying coronary artery disease and subsequent cardiac arrest here it is not possible to say in this particular situation whether this tragic outcome could have been avoided with an earlier and more effective response, but the evidence here was that there was not a level of supervision that enabled the problem to be recognised immediately, and neither was there an adequate attempt to resuscitate once it had been established that a person had collapsed. There was also evidence of absence of adequate risk assessment in respect of gym users, a lack of qualified first aiders, and an absence of formalised national guidance on risk assessment in fitness centres and gyms. There was evidence that there was HSE guidance on swimming pool operations, but there is not for other facilities and it was felt that this would help the industry, particularly given the proliferation of such gymnasia in recent years, if there was formalised national guidance on risk assessment in fitness centres and gyms. ”

    Source location

    ANTHONY STEPHEN CLEVELAND · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Buckinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Peter Harry Mackie · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Peter Harry Mackie, a prisoner at HMP Springhill, was found hanging in the prison chapel on 28 December 2013 and was declared deceased. The inquest concluded that he took his own life while the balance of his mind was disturbed. Concerns included the availability and deployment of first aiders and healthcare staff across the prison sites, and a lack of clarity about when CPR should be commenced and what action untrained staff should take.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance for CPR-trained staff on when to commence CPR

    Wider context from the report

    “(3)It appears that there is not currently any guidance to staff as to when CPR should be commenced. This applies to CPR trained staff. For those without such training there is a lack of clarity as to what if any action they should undertake. ”

    Source location

    Peter Harry Mackie · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue interim First Aid Guidance for staff during consultation on the revised policy instruction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All first aid trained staff will be aware of how and when to apply CPR following the training they receive. A new First Aid at Work PSI is currently taking place. Once the period of consultation is complete, a revised PSI will be published. During the interim period, NOMS has issued the old First Aid Guidance for staff to use, as attached.”

    Source location

    2014-0528-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish a revised First Aid at Work policy instruction after consultation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All first aid trained staff will be aware of how and when to apply CPR following the training they receive. A new First Aid at Work PSI is currently taking place. Once the period of consultation is complete, a revised PSI will be published. During the interim period, NOMS has issued the old First Aid Guidance for staff to use, as attached.”

    Source location

    2014-0528-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 December 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide all Grendon and Springhill staff with written advice on responding to a non-breathing person through a booklet, induction and the local intranet.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “HMP Grendon and Springhill have sought additional advice from the Resuscitation Council UK on when CPR should be commenced and will be providing staff who work at HMP Grendon and Springhill with written advice on what to do should they find somebody not breathing. This will be provided to all staff in the form of a booklet by 31 January 2015, to ensure staff receive this information. The information will form part of the induction for new staff and will be made available on the local intranet at HMP Grendon and Springhill.”

    Source location

    2014-0528-Response-by-NOMS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 December 2014

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026