Recurring concern

Unreliable reporting of patient-safety incidents

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 16 Dec 2013•Latest report 1 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the dedicated patient-safety incident-reporting process, including encouragement and staff understanding, recognition of reportable events, submission of incident or error reports, and systems for entering, updating or amending reports.

Not included

  • Excludes failures of incident investigation, organisational learning or implementation of corrective actions where the incident-reporting process itself is not deficient.
  • Excludes generic documentation, training, staffing or communication deficiencies that are not directly tied to reporting patient-safety incidents or unsafe practices.
  • Excludes professional-regulator reporting duties where the concern is external misconduct reporting rather than the organisational patient-safety incident-reporting process.
  • Excludes factual descriptions of incidents or under-reporting risk that do not identify an unsafe reporting-process condition.
Reports
46

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
52

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
58

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care7
Care Quality Commission3
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB2
Borough Care Ltd2
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Hc-One Limited2
NHS England2
Aden Court Care Home1
ADL Plc1
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Capita Business Services Ltd1
Capita PLC1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Gary OTTWAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gary Ottway, aged 41, died after being found in cardiac arrest while detained alone in a seclusion room under constant nursing observation during a severe mental health episode. The report raised concerns about whether observation was constant or effective, delays in entering the room and obtaining emergency equipment, gaps in available medical training and resources, and ineffective chest compressions. The inquest determined that he died from natural causes involving two heart conditions.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to report poor visibility through a seclusion-room observation panel

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The senior duty nurse also told me that the visibility through the Perspex panel was poor, though he had never brought this to anyone’s attention and did not do so after Mr Ottway’s death. ”

    Source location

    Gary OTTWAY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  2. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Dorothy Ann SPIBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dorothy Ann Spiby, a nursing home resident with dementia, frailty and type 1 diabetes, suffered an unwitnessed fall in her bedroom on 22 October 2021. She sustained an eye-socket fracture and two rib fractures, developed pneumonia in hospital, and died on 28 October 2021. Concerns included unclear and undocumented accounts of the incident, no incident form, no investigation, and no evidence of learning to safeguard residents in future.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to complete incident forms

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Tamworth Court Nursing Home staff reported to the hospital that Mrs Spiby became distressed and ran into collision with a wall when trying to leave her room, before falling to the floor. The origin of this account was unclear from the evidence. No record was made of the incident in the nursing records. 2. No incident form was completed. 3. No investigation of the accident or the circumstances giving rise to it was undertaken. 4. There was no evidence of a commitment to learning from this incident with a view to safeguarding residents in the future. ”

    Source location

    Dorothy Ann SPIBY · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor documentation daily through management checks, record triangulation, spot checks and immediate corrective supervision where shortcomings are identified.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Any shortcomings in documentation are addressed immediately by the home management team. Conversations with staff are formally recorded within supervisions and any disciplinary action taken, as necessary. Where there is non-compliance found the staff members will be given supervisions and learning sheets will be completed with them to encourage adherence to best practice. Actions in this regard were completed by 18.3.22 as planned.”

    Source location

    Response from Prime Life Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure nursing and care staff read and understand accident, incident and falls-management policies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All nursing and care staff to be aware of Prime Life Accident/Incident Policies and Management of Falls Policy- evidence to be left staff have read and understand these policies. Actions to be completed by 11.4.22 and timeframes met.”

    Source location

    Response from Prime Life Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver falls-management and head-injury training to nurses, covering observations, documentation, assessments, care planning and falls-risk reduction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Falls Management including Head Injury Training for all nurses. Training to be delivered by the nurse trainer/advisor and to include: Body Mapping, vital observations including Neuro-observations, RESTORE2(NEWS2), Accident/Incident forms, care plans, risk assessments, daily notes, communication record – MDT and reducing the risk of falls. Actions to be completed by 22.4.22 (slight amendment to the original action plan in place due to annual leave and sickness amongst the nursing team) with the exception of the clinical lead who is currently on long term sick.”

    Source location

    Response from Prime Life Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide nurses with incident-form completion training and supervision, including body mapping.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Nurses to have training/supervision in Incident Form completion including body mapping. Training and supervisions to be undertaken by nurse trainer/advisor and timeframes set to 15.4.22. This has been completed by all nurses with the exception of the clinical lead who is”

    Source location

    Response from Prime Life Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver safeguarding training covering reportable incidents, incident reporting and incident auditing, with regional oversight of timely external reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Safeguarding training has been delivered by the internal quality team, this included reportable incidents, incident reports and auditing of incidents. It is now the responsibility of the regional operations team to ensure that any reportable incidents are being sent through to the local authority and other interested parties without delay. The manager’s review of incident reports will be completed and overseen by the regional operational team. Training to be delivered by the providers Quality Matters Team. This initial action was completed by 25.3.22.”

    Source location

    Response from Prime Life Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Training for the clinical lead cannot currently be completed because the clinical lead is on long-term sick leave.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Falls Management including Head Injury Training for all nurses. Training to be delivered by the nurse trainer/advisor and to include: Body Mapping, vital observations including Neuro-observations, RESTORE2(NEWS2), Accident/Incident forms, care plans, risk assessments, daily notes, communication record – MDT and reducing the risk of falls. Actions to be completed by 22.4.22 (slight amendment to the original action plan in place due to annual leave and sickness amongst the nursing team) with the exception of the clinical lead who is currently on long term sick.”

    Source location

    Response from Prime Life Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 24 February 2022

    Open published response
  3. West Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dilys Greta Etchells was found after an unwitnessed fall at her nursing home, later diagnosed with fractures of the left tibia and fibula, and subsequently developed pressure ulcers before dying in hospital on 2 July 2021. The report identified concerns about the absence or documentation of fall-prevention measures, delayed medical referral, inadequate care documentation, handover communications, and wound-management procedures.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to report accidents when they take place

    Wider context from the report

    “• To review and reconsider the adequacy of the provision of crash and sensor mats and the means for properly documenting their use and reporting accidents when they take place. ”

    Source location

    Dilys Greta Etchells · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Vivien Brunning · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Vivien Brunning was admitted to hospital with sepsis and treated for a kidney stone, during which prescribed Clexane was temporarily held and then omitted on 13 and 14 July 2020. She developed a right brachial artery thrombosis, suffered a stroke during emergency thrombolysis, and died on 25 July 2020. Concerns included missed venous thromboembolism reviews, omitted anticoagulant doses, and failure to report the initial omission through the Trust’s incident reporting system.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to report noticed medication omissions through the incident reporting system

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The initial omission on 13th July 2020 was noticed by a ward doctor but was not reported through the Trust’s incident reporting system. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Vivien Brunning · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Azra Parveen HUSSAIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Azra Parveen HUSSAIN was found hanging from her en-suite bathroom door at Mary Seacole House on 6 May 2020 and could not be resuscitated. Concerns included that information from her family about a reported ligature attempt was not recorded, shared or used to reassess her risk, and that high-risk bathroom doors and other bedroom-area doors lacked adequate ligature mitigation. The inquest jury also identified missed opportunities concerning ECT treatment and suicide-risk management.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to raise incident reports for significant suicide-related information

    Wider context from the report

    “1. On the 4th May 2020 Azra's mother and daughter had been in telephone contact with the nurse in charge on the ward expressing concerns that Azra had messaged them to say she had attempted suicide using shoelaces as a ligature. The nurse spoke to Azra who denied making a ligature, Azra's neck was examined and she had no marks from ligature use. The shoelaces from one pair of shoes were removed but other shoelaces, clothing and bedding were left in her possession as it was felt that Azra was not at an immediate risk. She was not believed to be at immediate risk because, whilst it was a feature of her mental state common to many patients that she would regularly talk about not wanting to live and requesting an overdose, there was no evidence that she had made an active suicide attempt and she had no history of suicide or self-harm attempts. The fact that she was now saying that she had attempted to make a ligature was a change in her presentation (her previous suicidal ideation had centred around requesting assistance to overdose), it was also of significance that she was saying one thing to her family and something different to a clinician. BSMHT accepted that the information was significant and therefore there ought to have been consideration of it by her treating team with a review of her risk and observation levels. However, no record at all was made of the family's concerns and the account given by Azra. Her risk screen was not updated, an incident report was not raised, and the information was not included in handover to the next shift or at the next MDT on the 6th May 2020. Due to the COVID19 pandemic Azra's family could not attend that meeting and raise their concerns directly. Microsoft Teams was used by some clinicians to attend the MDT on the 6th May but was not made available to Azra's family nor was a telephone number to dial into the meeting. BSMHT has put in a system for a form to be completed in advance of an MDT which requires the family's input to be sought, placed on the form and considered in the MDT. It is my concern that this is equivalent to the family being included in the meeting (prior to COVID families were invited to attend MDTs): there is the potential that information will not be recorded accurately or will not be understood in written form, it also doesn't afford family the opportunity to hear the plan arising from the meeting and provide their views. There is no reason why attendance by a remote platform or telephone line at the meeting itself cannot be offered to family for all MDTs. ”

    Source location

    Azra Parveen HUSSAIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    June Patricia Margaret PARLOUR · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Parlour was an inpatient with disseminated terminal cancer when she received morphine doses exceeding national and hospital guidelines. Her condition deteriorated, and she later died of opiate toxicity; the overdose significantly hastened her death. Concerns included staff awareness of morphine guidance, inaccurate hospital guidance and incident reporting, education and auditing for doctors, unclear prescribing instructions, and communication and escalation failures between staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incorrect quotation of hospital IV morphine dose guidelines in Serious Incident reports

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) It was concerning that even the hospital’s own Serious Incident report had incorrectly quoted the hospital’s guidelines as to the safe dose of IV morphine and that neither the investigatory team or any of the clinical staff who subsequently read that report had picked up on this. ”

    Source location

    June Patricia Margaret PARLOUR · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish trained investigating officers and a team-based process for patient safety incident investigations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has been selected as one of the early adopters for the new NHS Patient Safety Incident Response Framework, which commenced on the 2 November 2020. In establishing the new framework ESNEFT has put in place a number of highly trained investigating officers to lead the patient safety incident investigations, utilising relevant clinical experts within the process. Through a team approach to investigations, greater scrutiny of the information and evidence provided will be undertaken and will support a timely response to incidents and the identification of improvements required. The framework aims to ensure investigations are undertaken in a timely manner and with a greater involvement of patients, families and carers.”

    Source location

    2020-0186-Response-from-East-Suffolk-and-North-Essex_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 November 2020

    Open published response
  7. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Simon Paul Barber · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Simon Paul Barber, who was wheelchair bound due to multiple sclerosis, died on 18 July 2018 from hypoxia due to smoke inhalation after a fire caused by a naked flame contacting his clothing. The principal concerns were inadequate care-provider risk assessments, insufficient consideration of emergency exit and fire risks, and staff failing to report an incident involving a lit cigarette.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure staff awareness of reporting all incidents endangering service users

    Wider context from the report

    “Evidence was given before the Court that the risk assessment carried out First Class Care was inadequate. In my opinion there is a risk that future deaths may occur unless adequate risk assessments are carried out by First Class Care and staff are made aware of the importance of reporting all incidents that endanger the safety of service users ”

    Source location

    Simon Paul Barber · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Natasha Learline CHIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Natasha Learline Chin died in her cell at HMP Bronzefield on 19 July 2016 after profuse vomiting associated with undertreated opiate and alcohol withdrawal. The report identified concerns about delayed medication, inadequate monitoring and escalation, failures in record-keeping and governance, and insufficient auditing and training.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make datix referrals for missed medications

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The prison officer with responsibility for the wing on which Miss Chin was resident was not privy to what medication she was prescribed nor when it should be administered. There is no system in place for consent to be obtained from prisoners for this information to be shared with discipline staff. 2. The Sodexo Justice Service Protocols in respect of opiate and alcohol withdrawal did not adequately mirror the National Protocols and were, in parts, unclear and difficult to comprehend. 3. Nurses failed to make any datix referrals in respect of missed medications. 4. The following matters have to date not been formally audited by Sodexo Justice Services: i.) Whether prisoners who do not attend for prescribed medications are followed up and the reason for non-attendance is properly recorded. ii.) Whether critical medication is administered on time. iii.) Whether proper observations are undertaken in line with national or local protocols in respect of opiate and alcohol withdrawal. iv.) Whether medical records on System 1 are accurately recorded. v.) Whether the Patient Guidance Directions in respect of prescribing by nurses are adhered to, and whether medical records are checked before any prescriptions are made by nurses pursuant to the directive. 5. As a consequence it is not possible for Sodexo Justice Services to know whether the matters raised in 4.(i) to (v) have been adequately addressed. 6. The response by Sodexo Justice Services to the issues identified in the report dated the 13th April 2016 of Her Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Prisons in respect of non-administration of prescribed medication was inadequate. It does not appear that there was a clear line of governance in respect of this matter. 7. Whether there is adequate training: i.) of discipline and clinical staff, including agency staff, to make them aware of the signs and dangers of opiate and alcohol withdrawal. ii.) of clinical staff in respect of the completion of opiate and alcohol withdrawal scales. ”

    Source location

    Natasha Learline CHIN · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs. Joan Catherine BLABER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    The report concerns the death of Mrs. Joan Catherine BLABER, with the circumstances referred to in the Record of Inquest. The principal concerns included failures to comply with COSHH requirements, inadequate training and supervision, confusion over staff roles, poor communication of practices, and failures to report and learn from dangerous or near-miss events.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to encourage reporting of suboptimal and dangerous practices

    Wider context from the report

    “(7) Failure to encourage reporting of suboptimal and dangerous practices within the hospital. ”

    Source location

    Mrs. Joan Catherine BLABER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify near-miss events

    Wider context from the report

    “(8) Failure to identify "near miss" events, to disseminate these and to learn from previous mistakes. ”

    Source location

    Mrs. Joan Catherine BLABER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver and disseminate an inquest-learning presentation that explains system failures and instructs staff to report COSHH and patient-safety concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ also designed a presentation using the learning from Mrs Blaber’s inquest which she has delivered to her teams and a wider audience, being open and frank about what happened, the system failures and our organisational learning. This presentation encourages staff to report any concerns about patient safety / COSHH management immediately to their line manager and to report it as an incident on Datix.”

    Source location

    Response from Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Appraise the Trust incident-reporting system and develop preliminary recommendations for improving incident data capture and analysis.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the inquest, ████████, our Deputy Chief of Safety has commenced a wide ranging appraisal of the Trust’s Incident Reporting system. This piece of work is still in progress, the preliminary recommendations include:”

    Source location

    Response from Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 February 2024

    Open published response
  10. Isle of Wight

    AI-generated summary

    Cuthbert Anthony Stanley Hingert · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Cuthbert Anthony Stanley Hingert was admitted to hospital with shortness of breath and possible acute coronary syndrome, during which duplicate doses of antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications were given. He later became confused, fell and sustained a subdural haematoma, skull fracture and subarachnoid haemorrhage, dying in hospital on 5 March 2017. Concerns included failures to check the medicines database, inappropriate or potentially inappropriate prescribing, delayed documentation, inadequate staff training and failure to report a medication incident according to protocol.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to make immediate DATIX incident reports in accordance with hospital protocol

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Upon discovering the errors with the medications which are documented above, a nurse did not follow hospital protocol and make a DATIX incident report despite acknowledging that she should have done so immediately. ”

    Source location

    Cuthbert Anthony Stanley Hingert · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026