Recurring concern

Failure to provide continuity of patient care

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 4 Sep 2013•Latest report 15 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the end-to-end patient-care continuity process, including unclear or unassigned responsibility, changing or excessive personnel, inadequate continuity between clinicians or services, and insufficient coordination that leaves care fragmented or without consistent oversight.

Not included

  • Excludes failures limited to a specific handover, record, referral or discharge control when continuity of patient care is not itself the shared unsafe condition.
  • Excludes generic staffing shortages, workload or turnover concerns unless they directly result in failure to maintain continuity of patient care.
  • Excludes continuity failures in non-patient processes, such as equipment, premises or administrative workflows.
  • Excludes failures belonging to a more specific named safety system or pathway where that system is the supported parent boundary.
Reports
88

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
92

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
151

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care27
NHS England16
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust6
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust5
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence4
Care Quality Commission3
Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust3
North East London NHS Foundation Trust3
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust3
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust2
King'S College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust2
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board2
North London NHS Foundation Trust2
North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust2
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Martha Poppy MILLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martha sustained a handlebar injury while cycling on a family holiday in Wales, was transferred to King’s College Hospital London, and died approximately one month later from refractory shock, sepsis, pancreatic transection and abdominal trauma. At King’s, she was not referred promptly to paediatric intensivists; concerns also included the paper-based paediatric early warning score system and stalled plans to improve coordination between paediatric hepatology and intensive care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain an effective formal relationship between paediatric hepatology and paediatric intensive care

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The King’s serious incident investigation identified that Martha’s care fell down between the paediatric hepatologists and the paediatric intensivists. I heard evidence that it is the intention of King’s to improve the formal relationship between the hepatology and the paediatric intensive care departments, and to ensure that there is pro-active paediatric intensive care outreach. However, the intended programme has stalled, I think partly because of the pandemic. It seems that there needs to be an impetus for this to be re-started and to gain sufficient momentum to operate smoothly in the future. ”

    Source location

    Martha Poppy MILLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a bespoke organisational-development package to improve collaboration, communication and conflict management between hepatology and paediatric intensive care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• An organisational development expert has been identified to work alongside the Children’s Health Senior Leadership team to develop a bespoke package that will help to enhance effective clinical relationships between hepatology and the paediatric intensive care departments. The package consists of three stages which will help the teams to explore and build better relationships in relation to collaboration, communications and conflict.”

    Source location

    2022-0063-Response-from-Kings-College-Hospital_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 March 2022

    Open published response
  2. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Stephanie Moyce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephanie Moyce, who had a history of mental health issues and repeated suicide attempts, took her own life on 30 July 2021 and was discovered by her partner. The report identified concerns about unclear responsibility for care and oversight after psychotherapy discharge, inadequate discharge planning and safety-netting, the lack of routine multidisciplinary discussion, and insufficient involvement of her carer in Section 117 after-care reviews.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity about responsibility for oversight of patient care following discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Evidence confirmed a conspicuous lack of clarity as to who, amongst EPUT clinicians/staff has the responsibility for oversight of patient care following discharge, including responsibility for ensuring adequate and appropriate safety-netting is in place in the event of relapse, where a Care Coordinator is no longer in place/has not been replaced; ”

    Source location

    Stephanie Moyce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Nichola Jane Lomax · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nichola Jane Lomax had a long history of an eating disorder and attended hospital several times in 2020 with severe malnutrition and electrolyte imbalance. She died on 3 August 2020 after delays and failings involving hospital treatment, specialist referral, communication, monitoring, nutritional care and access to appropriate services. The report identified concerns about inadequate eating-dis disorder training, access to specialist advice, referral criteria, critical services, community monitoring, nursing care and investigation of deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear responsibility for monitoring and co-ordinating community eating disorder care

    Wider context from the report

    “3) Referral Criteria for the Priory and Community Eating Disorder Service For GMMH, PRIORY, BURY CLINICAL COMMISSIONING, ICB In Greater Manchester the Community Eating Disorder Service (CEDS) do not accept patients who have a BMI of less than 14. The court heard this is in part due to the structure and commissioning of the service. Adherence to this criteria had the following implications for Nichola’s care: • As the only service who can refer to the Priory, CEDS became aware of Nichola. CEDS involvement created the impression that they were providing care to her. This created a confused picture as to who was co-ordinating her care. • This meant that monitoring of Nichola was undertaken by the GP practice who were not specialists and had limited knowledge of eating disorders. It would have been more clinically appropriate for CEDS to have taken on this role and the court heard that in many other areas of the country the CEDS accept patients with BMIs lower than 14 and have responsibility for the monitoring and co-ordination of patients. The Court heard evidence from a number of practitioners as to their understanding of the referral criteria for Nichola to be admitted to The Priory. The clear impression given by The Priory was that Nichola would not be accepted until 1) a bed became available but also 2) her BMI increased to somewhere around 12/13. The Court was told that the rationale for this is that a patient with a BMI below 13 is at high risk of refeeding according to MARSIPAN and more likely to require an acute hospital admission. This impression meant that hospital clinicians and the GP understood that Nichola would not be accepted by the Priory until her weight had increased. However the court heard that the Priory can take someone with a BMI of less than 13 if medically stable and the benefits of specialist care outweigh the risks of refeeding. Given the impression created by the Priory no attempt was made to obtain an emergency bed for Nichola who was medically stable for some time after the 11th June. ”

    Source location

    Nichola Jane Lomax · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a community eating disorder medical-monitoring pathway and accept medically stable patients based on clinical assessment rather than BMI alone.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GMMH) welcomes the recent investment by Bury Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) in the new GMMH clinical model for adult eating disorders which is compliant with national commissioning guidance. This funding commitment will enable the provision of more comprehensive care and treatment to adults with eating disorders under GMMH. This will enable GMMH Community Eating Disorder Services (CEDS) to build on previous advice provided regarding MARSIPAN and dietetic advice for Fairfield General Hospital (FGH) and other acute hospitals across Greater Manchester and to work closely with partner organisations to develop robust pathways to ensure access to specialist advice.”

    Source location

    2021-0433 - Response regarding Nichola Lomax
    Page 24 · response
    Published 31 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a shared operating procedure and training for communication between acute, community and specialist inpatient services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A meeting, attended by Consultant Psychiatrist ████████ and I was held with Northern Care Alliance and the Community Eating Disorders Service on Thursday 10 February 2022. During the meeting there was agreement that efforts would be made to enhance communication and understanding by virtue of developing a shared standard operating procedure and training. The standard operating procedure is under development and will in effect be a shared document which is owned by the relevant stakeholders. The standard operating procedure will also be shared with the provider collaborative and a request made for this to be an agenda item at the next liaison meeting.”

    Source location

    2021-0433 - Response regarding Nichola Lomax
    Page 28 · response
    Published 31 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Approve and implement an expanded adult community eating disorder service with psychiatric, physical-health, psychological and dietetic capacity.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A business case to expand the service in line with national standards and Greater Manchester and local priorities has been agreed between the CCG and GMMH, and was formally approved by the CCG board on 22 December 2021. I understand that the court was provided with a copy of this business case by GMMH during the course of the inquest; a further copy can be provided if needed. The new model as agreed includes the addition of psychiatry/ medical input to the service (a Consultant Psychiatrist and a Physical Health Practitioner) which will allow patients with a BMI of less than 14 to be accepted by the service and monitored medically by a clinician who has experience and knowledge of eating disorders. In addition it will include:”

    Source location

    2021-0433 - Response regarding Nichola Lomax
    Page 33 · response
    Published 31 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the expanded adult eating disorder service to provide medical monitoring, specialist treatment, consultation and coordinated pathways.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “GMHSCP also acknowledges that the commissioned adult eating disorders service in Bury (like many areas of the country) was insufficient to meet local need. Since then, funding has now also been confirmed between Bury CCG and GMHSCP to implement the GMMH Adult Eating Disorders Business Case.”

    Source location

    2021-0433 - Response regarding Nichola Lomax
    Page 39 · response
    Published 31 December 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Priory Hospital Cheadle Royal is not commissioned to provide community interventions, apart from assessments that may lead to admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Accessing Specialist Advice For clarification please note that Priory Hospital Cheadle Royal is commissioned to provide inpatient care and treatment to patients with an eating disorder. The service is not commissioned to provide interventions in the community other than to undertake patient assessments that may or may not result in patient admission.”

    Source location

    2021-0433 - Response regarding Nichola Lomax
    Page 28 · response
    Published 31 December 2021

    Open published response
  4. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Neil Peter Bastock · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Neil Peter Bastock, who had a history of paranoid schizophrenia and previous suicide attempts and self-harm, died by suicide on 20 September 2021. The report raises concerns about rescinding his detention without family involvement or a formal capacity assessment, inadequate care planning and continuity, failures to respond to warning signs after he became a voluntary patient, and failure to notify police when he left the ward.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of continuity in treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Mr Bastock’s treatment in the Newsam Centre lacked continuity. The responsible clinician was a locum who had recently taken over from another locum psychiatrist. There was no ward manager on the ward to provide leadership for the care being provided. There was no psychologist on the ward to contribute to care planning. The nursing records were incomplete, possibly due to teething problems associated with the recently introduced electronic recording system. ”

    Source location

    Neil Peter Bastock · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the induction package to formalise explicit, proportionate support and supervision for locum medics.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The core professional standards require that any new Responsible Clinician has sufficient familiarity with a patient’s past and current history to support robust decision making. To ensure the Trust learns from the sad death of Mr Bastock, the Professional Medical Lead will formalise the support and supervision arrangements that are in place for locum medics by reviewing the current induction package to ensure support and supervision arrangements are explicit and proportionate.”

    Source location

    2021-0365-Response-from-Leeds-and-York-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 November 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the clinical handover process for locum medics to support robust clinical decision-making.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust will also review their clinical handover process to ensure it supports robust clinical decision making when locum medics commence in post.”

    Source location

    2021-0365-Response-from-Leeds-and-York-Partnership-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 November 2021

    Open published response
  5. Leicester City and South Leicestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Jane Lesley Bruce · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jane Bruce sustained a right tibia and fibula fracture after a fall, underwent surgery, and was receiving community wound care when her condition deteriorated. She presented to hospital with features consistent with sepsis and died the following day. The principal concern was that fragmented community nursing care, lack of wound photographs, and inability to access electronic records contributed to her deterioration not being fully appreciated and delayed escalation for medical review.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of continuity in community nursing staff assessing wounds

    Wider context from the report

    “Ms Bruce was care for in the community by several different District Nurses. This meant that it was not the same nurse who was always seeing the wound. No photographs were taken for continuity / reference to and the electronic records could not be accessed by the District Nurses while they were in Ms Bruce’s home. This meant that all information that could have been available was not. This meant that Ms Bruce’s change in condition was not fully appreciated. Leicestershire Partnership Trust have learned from this and District Nurse now have work mobile phones so that they can take photographic evidence of wounds as well as IT technology that means they can access the electronic records while they are with the patient. In addition, they also have a ‘sepsis’ bag containing equipment to record the blood pressure, oxygen saturation levels and temperature. Although this lesson has been learned and changes made to prevent future deaths locally, the concern is that the practice that was in place at the time of Ms Bruce’s death may be practice elsewhere. ”

    Source location

    Jane Lesley Bruce · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. East London

    AI-generated summary

    David Ayontunde Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Ayontunde Walker died on 27 November 2020 after his mental health deteriorated following discharge from hospital. The report identified concerns about repeated changes of care co-ordinator and the failure to obtain and share important risk information between the mental health trusts, resulting in an incomplete discharge risk assessment.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide continuity of care coordination

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Between end of May 2020 to November 2020, Mr Walker was allocated four different care co-ordinators. There was evidence that only one of these care co-ordinators established a therapeutic relationship with Mr Walker. Many of the care co-ordinators were locum staff. ”

    Source location

    David Ayontunde Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deploy semi-permanent agency staff to support community recovery teams during recruitment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “High turnover of care coordinators and only one formed a therapeutic relationship To act on the concerns immediately, agency staff have been sourced to support the Waltham Forest Community Recovery Teams. These staff have been recruited on a semi-permanent basis, whilst staff recruitment is taking place.”

    Source location

    Response from North East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit additional staff above establishment to reduce care-coordinator caseloads and support relationship building.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “High turnover of care coordinators and only one formed a therapeutic relationship To act on the concerns immediately, agency staff have been sourced to support the Waltham Forest Community Recovery Teams. These staff have been recruited on a semi-permanent basis, whilst staff recruitment is taking place.”

    Source location

    Response from North East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 22 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide induction training and clinical supervision for permanent and temporary staff managing risks and patient relationships.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All staff, including temporary staff will be supported with training during induction and will be provided clinical supervision, to ensure that they are appropriately managing patients’ identified risks and are building relationship with patients they work with.”

    Source location

    Response from North East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 October 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide clinical supervisors with a care-coordination prompt covering relationship building, risk management and caseload management.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All clinical supervisors will be provided with a template / prompt that highlights the key elements of care coordination such as relationship building, risk management and caseload management, so staff are supported in their work with patients.”

    Source location

    Response from North East London NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 October 2021

    Open published response
  7. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Darren John Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Darren John Lawrence had a history of suicidal thoughts, plans, previous attempts, mental ill health, disengagement from services and medication noncompliance. He was found dead at his home on 29 August 2020, and the inquest conclusion was suicide. Principal concerns included inadequate communication and follow-up between mental health services and the GP practice, failure to ensure that prescribed venlafaxine was issued and collected, insufficient escalation when direct contact with him was unsuccessful, and inadequate systems for managing correspondence and medication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of planned CMHT/HBTT involvement with the GP in overall management and treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “g. There was no CMHT/HBTT planned involvement with the GP in the overall management and treatment of the deceased apart from simply requesting that they issue repeat prescriptions. This meant that opportunities to develop other lines of communication and information sharing as well as support were lost. ”

    Source location

    Darren John Lawrence · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Audit CMHT care plans and CPA reviews to verify GP contact and contribution to reviews, sharing findings and any action plan with divisional leadership.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Team Manager for this CMHT will carry out an audit of a selection of the teams care plans and CPA reviews to provide assurance that the Trust CPA process is being followed and that the GP’s are being contacted and requested to contribute as part of the review. This audit will take place by 31st January 2022 and the audit, and any resulting action plan will be shared at the Divisional Senior Leadership Group.”

    Source location

    2021-0349-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 21 October 2021

    Open published response
  8. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Sheldon Marshall · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sheldon Marshall became seriously ill during a trek to Mount Everest Base Camp after sustaining a fractured left rib, later developing high-altitude pulmonary oedema, bronchopneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome and pneumothoraces. He died in intensive care on 17 December 2017 after cardiac arrests and a pleural injury associated with a right chest drain. The concerns identified were insufficient senior clinical input at Mayday Assistance Limited and unclear responsibility between Mayday Assistance Limited and air ambulance providers for patients’ overall medical management, presenting risks of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity about relative responsibility for patients’ overall medical management between Mayday Assistance Limited and air ambulance providers

    Wider context from the report

    “The medical management of patients once Mayday Assistance Limited has instructed an Air Ambulance provider During the course of the inquest the court heard evidence that on 24 November 2017 Mayday Assistance Limited instructed Tyrol Air Ambulance (TAA) to repatriate Mr Marshall from Nepal to the UK. The court heard that the repatriation to the UK did not ultimately go ahead as Mr Marshall was not considered fit enough to undergo the flight on the dates that TAA had an available aircraft. The court found that during the period from 24 November to 4 December 2017 there was a lack of clarity as between Mayday Assistance Limited and TAA with regards to who was responsible for Mr Marshall’s overall medical management, and as a result neither Mayday Assistance Limited nor TAA were monitoring Mr Marshall’s ongoing condition with a view to reviewing and advising on (i) whether the UK was the appropriate destination for Mr Marshall and identifying potential regional alternatives and (ii) the overall risk/benefits of him remaining in Nepal versus being transferred to another country in the region. Whilst the court was not persuaded that this omission caused or contributed to the particular facts of Mr Marshall’s death, the Coroner is concerned that this lack of clarity remains today, not only as between Mayday Assistance Limited and TAA but potentially as between Mayday Assistance Limited and other air ambulance providers, which presents a risk of future death. ”

    Source location

    Sheldon Marshall · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish Air Ambulance Support Agreements with providers to clarify responsibilities and promote close working relationships on all cases.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “An Air Ambulance Support Agreement is now in place with Mayday's Air Ambulance providers, as attached, to ensure that both parties are clear regarding their responsibilities and to ensure that there is a close working relationship on all cases. If a company declines to sign our agreement and cannot provide one with similar protocols they will be removed from Mayday's provider list.”

    Source location

    2021-0276-Response-from-Mayday-Group-Ltd_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 26 August 2021

    Open published response
  9. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Elena WELLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elena Wells, who had a history of mental health issues, died after placing a ligature around her neck while alone at home awaiting an urgent mental health admission. The report identified unclear responsibility and communication between the Local Authority and Mental Health Trust, and insufficient out-of-hours support and supervision while she waited for a bed.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear allocation of overall responsibility for care

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Both the Local Authority and the Trust were involved in the care of Miss Wells for the last 24 hours of her life. Evidence showed that there was a grey area in respect of responsibility for her care, at this time. There was no clear guidance as to who held overall responsibility for her care and there was no clear policy of how the two organisations should work together in these kinds of situations. It is requested that the Local Authority and the Trust consider how to improve communication and clearly define responsibility between the two organisations which could improve the safety of patients with serious mental health difficulties who were waiting for urgent admission to a mental health unit. ”

    Source location

    Elena WELLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a clear inter-organisational working policy

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Both the Local Authority and the Trust were involved in the care of Miss Wells for the last 24 hours of her life. Evidence showed that there was a grey area in respect of responsibility for her care, at this time. There was no clear guidance as to who held overall responsibility for her care and there was no clear policy of how the two organisations should work together in these kinds of situations. It is requested that the Local Authority and the Trust consider how to improve communication and clearly define responsibility between the two organisations which could improve the safety of patients with serious mental health difficulties who were waiting for urgent admission to a mental health unit. ”

    Source location

    Elena WELLS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise the Trust-wide CRHT operational policy, including referral pathways and defined responsibilities for services supporting patients awaiting admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response, the Trust is in the process of developing a new Crisis Resolution Home Treatment Team (CRHT) Operational Policy. An interim policy was presented to the Operational Management Board in December 2020 and it was agreed the CRHT teams would work to this whilst the policy is further developed by the newly appointed Trust wide Urgent Care Pathway Lead.”

    Source location

    2020-0248-Responses-from-Sussex-Partnership-Foundation-NHS-Trust-and-Brighton-Hove-City-Council-Redacted..pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run a daily Urgent Demand Oversight meeting to review admission demand, available resources and support packages for patients awaiting hospital care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Locally, the Care Delivery Services [CDS] in Brighton has established an Urgent Demand Oversight meeting that enables the CDS Leads to have daily oversight of our patients requiring admission to hospital. This meeting is informed by the various Operational meetings that take place daily in our Community, Urgent and Acute Care Services and is described in the enclosed Terms of Reference (appendix 1).”

    Source location

    2020-0248-Responses-from-Sussex-Partnership-Foundation-NHS-Trust-and-Brighton-Hove-City-Council-Redacted..pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise a Brighton and Hove flowchart and local protocol clarifying how AMHPs secure care or treatment while patients await admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Productive discussions have taken place between the local authority and SPFT staff to identify what policies, practice guidance and communications need to be produced or amended to clarify professional roles within the mental health legal framework. It is agreed that a simple Brighton and Hove flowchart describing how an AMHP can ensure a patient post-assessment receives necessary care or treatment without delay regardless of bed availability is essential. A draft flowchart has already been produced. There is also a need for AMHPs to be accepted as Trusted Assessors which would enable more efficient and faster referrals into SPFT services.”

    Source location

    2020-0248-Responses-from-Sussex-Partnership-Foundation-NHS-Trust-and-Brighton-Hove-City-Council-Redacted..pdf
    Page 10 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing urgent demand meetings, Haven availability and agreed AMHP operational arrangements are considered sufficient to prevent the identified confusion recurring meanwhile.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Based on the positive working relationship that exists between the local authority and the SPFT, I am confident that we can achieve the clarity needed for our respective staff to be able to operate in an appropriate manner to ensure patient safety. This task is being prioritised within the local authority and we have agreed with the SPFT that the flowchart should be finalised by the end of March 2021 confirming a local protocol between our organisations. In the interim the measures that have been put in place already by SPFT eg. the introduction of a daily Urgent Demand and Capacity meeting conducted by the Care Delivery Service, the availability of the local Haven@Millview hospital and the agreement of operational management of the role of an AMHP, assure me that this confusion that was evident with some professionals involved in Miss Wells care in March 2020 should not arise again.”

    Source location

    2020-0248-Responses-from-Sussex-Partnership-Foundation-NHS-Trust-and-Brighton-Hove-City-Council-Redacted..pdf
    Page 10 · response
    Published 29 December 2020

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Barry Wayne Preston · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barry Wayne Preston, who lacked capacity and lived in supported accommodation, suffered a series of falls and traumatic brain injuries before developing urosepsis associated with a catheter that was not replaced within the guidance period, followed by bronchopneumonia. The report identified concerns about inaccurate documentation, unsuitable placement and wards, inadequate coordination and ownership of care, failures to hold best interests meetings, and insufficient understanding of his lack of capacity.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unclear responsibility for care decisions and placement suitability assessment

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The inquest heard that whilst he was being treated in acute settings there was no coordination or ownership of his care. It was unclear as to who was making decisions and assessing suitability of placement. ”

    Source location

    Barry Wayne Preston · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of coordination and ownership of care in acute settings

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The inquest heard that whilst he was being treated in acute settings there was no coordination or ownership of his care. It was unclear as to who was making decisions and assessing suitability of placement. ”

    Source location

    Barry Wayne Preston · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a competency framework for identifying and assessing patients with complex health, social and onward care needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a combined service it has been identified that there are a number of skills and competencies which all members of the team will need to have in order to identify those patients with complex onward needs. The development is underway but has not been finalised due to the COVID-19 response. Additional training of existing staff is being undertaken and will be completed by the end of August 2020.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen and ratify the Mental Capacity Act policy to clarify assessment responsibilities, decision makers and Independent Mental Capacity Advocate referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In response to the concern raised of poor appreciation of the gentleman’s lack of capacity to make decisions about his care, BFT has completed a review of the ‘Mental Capacity Act 2005’ policy. The narrative in the policy has been strengthened in respect of defining roles and responsibilities in the application of mental capacity assessments and there is clarity as to whom should be ‘The Decision Maker’ and the legal requirement for referral and involvement of Independent Mental Capacity Advocates in the absence of a relevant representative. The revised policy has been ratified by the Safeguarding Committee on 16th June 2020.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a Home First competency framework for recommending appropriate intermediate-care placements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Home First team are a therapy based team which aims to support those patients in the ED and assessment wards to return home without a longer period of hospital admission. It has been identified that there is a skills gap within this team and a competency framework has been developed to support staff in making the appropriate recommendation for placement at intermediate care units. In order to ensure all transfers are safe these will be reviewed on a daily basis by a member of the nursing team within the IDT.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require ward managers to escalate patients with complex needs to the Integrated Discharge Team for a full multidisciplinary meeting before transfer of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Ward Managers have been instructed that any patient with complex needs should be escalated to the IDT for a full MDT meeting where any transfer of care is being considered.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Communicate expectations to staff that significant changes require consideration and recording of capacity assessments and Best Interest meetings, with care-plan liaison monitored through supervision.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Team Managers have discussed the expectations with all staff, that every time there is a significant change in an individual's circumstance, that capacity assessments & Best Interest Meetings are considered and clearly recorded, and that care coordinators ensure they proactively liaise with other care providers to ensure any changes to the care plan can be reviewed and updated appropriately, and this is being monitored via supervision.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Have Team Managers proactively review cases involving admission to other care settings during supervision to check care coordination and consideration of capacity and Best Interest meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Through supervision and team meetings, all staff have been informed of the expectations of a care coordinator when patients are admitted to alternative care settings, such as acute trusts, and informed that they must consider support from advocacy / IMCA. Team Managers will proactively review cases where individuals have been admitted to other care settings in supervision to ensure that care coordinator are proactively coordinating the individuals care, and consideration has been given to Capacity and Best Interest meetings, where appropriate.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a single care-coordinator point of contact, with care coordinators providing hospital in-reach for involved service users.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A review of the mental health practitioner role within the IDT had commenced prior to the death of Mr Preston, however following a subsequent review with the Local Authority and BNFT, taking into consideration the concerns noted within the inquest, the decision has been taken to end the secondment of the mental health social worker and return the postholder to Greater Manchester Mental Health. There is now one point of contact, which is the care coordinator, who will in-reach into the hospital when any service user they are involved with is admitted.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-Council_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide the Integrated Discharge Team across all assessment wards and the Emergency Department, assigning a lead care coordinator from admission through discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the time of this incident the IDT did not provide a comprehensive service to inpatient assessment areas such as ward D2, operating an in-reach model which was reliant on other professionals identify those patients who had existing social care needs prior to admission to hospital. The team has been reconfigured to ensure that patients with complex health and social needs are identified through the same multi-disciplinary team process that has been in place on base ward areas. Since May 2020, all assessment wards as well as the Emergency Department are provided a full service and a lead care coordinator is assigned to oversee the coordination of the discharge planning process from admission to discharge.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-Council_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require wards to escalate patients with complex needs to the Integrated Discharge Team for a full multidisciplinary meeting before considering transfer of care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Actions taken by Bolton Council and BNFT”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-Council_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bring the Home First Team, inpatient therapy services and Integrated Discharge Team under a single management structure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During the period of time that Mr Preston was an inpatient he was seen by multiple teams including the Home First Team, inpatient therapy services and the Integrated Discharge Team (IDT). Since this incident it has been recognised that there were multiple handovers between teams and these teams have now been brought together under a single management structure in order to provide improved communication between staff groups and lead to better patient experience.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide assessment wards and the Emergency Department with a full Integrated Discharge Team service and assign a lead care coordinator for each patient's discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the time of this incident the IDT did not provide a comprehensive service to inpatient assessment areas such as ward D2, operating an in-reach model which was reliant on other professionals to identify those patients who had existing social care needs prior to admission to hospital. The team has been reconfigured to ensure that patients with complex health and social needs are identified through the same multi-disciplinary team process that has been in place on base ward areas. Since May 2020, all assessment wards, as well as the Emergency Department are provided a full service and a lead care coordinator is assigned to oversee the coordination of the discharge planning process from admission to discharge.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide a single hospital-based care coordinator for each patient and record coordination input in electronic and social services records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The IDT has identified that the role of a seconded mental health post within the team was a key omission in the management of Mr Preston’s journey. The use of different organisation’s case recording systems also resulted in the failure to identify that the patient already had a care coordinator in the community and the needs to identify an IMCA to represent the patient’s best interest. Since this incident the IDT has in conjunction with GMMHFT, removed this role from the service in order to provide a single care coordinator (this will either be a social worker or discharge nurse) for each patient who is hospital based and will liaise with other organisations where needed. All input will be recorded in the patient’s electronic patient record and social services case recording systems.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the care coordinator as the single mental health contact for hospital admissions and require re-entry into hospital care to maintain communication and consistency.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A review of the mental health practitioner role within the Integrated Discharge Team had commenced prior to the death of Mr Preston, however following a subsequent review with the Local Authority and Bolton Foundation Trust, taking into consideration the concerns noted within the inquest, the decision has been taken to end the secondment of the mental health social worker and return the practitioner to their substantive post within Greater Manchester Mental Health. Going forward there is now one point of contact with mental health services, the care coordinator, who will on re-arch into the hospital when any service user they are involved with is admitted, to provide consistency and ensure hospital staff are aware of any input from mental health services.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Advise care coordinators to proactively contact acute trusts and coordinate care when service users move between wards, hospitals or care settings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Care coordinators have been advised that as part of their role, they are expected to proactively in-reach into acute trusts, to ensure effective communication is facilitated, to mitigate risks of individuals being moved between wards / hospitals / other care settings without the care coordinator being informed; this will enable to care coordinator to appropriately coordinate care, taking into account an individual's holistic needs. (This is outlined with the Older Adult Service Operational Procedure and the Policy for the Transfer of Service Users to Acute Care).”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bring the Home First Team, inpatient therapy services and Integrated Discharge Team under a single management structure to improve communication.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During the period of time that Mr Preston was an inpatient he was seen by multiple teams including the Home First Team, inpatient therapy services and the IDT. Since this incident it has been recognised that there were multiple handovers between teams and these teams have now been brought together under a single management structure in order to provide improved communication between staff groups and lead to better patient experience.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-Council_Redacted-1.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bolton Council will provide a further detailed response on aspects of care coordination, ownership and decision-making.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I am advised that Bolton Council Local Authority will also be providing you with a detailed response to Section 5 (4).”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Local authorities, service providers and the Care Quality Commission are responsible for acting on allegations of poor care, neglect or abuse.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Government is committed to preventing and reducing the risk of harm to adults in vulnerable situations. Under the Care Act 2014, we expect local authorities to ensure that the services they commission are safe, effective and of high quality. We also expect those providing the service, local authorities and the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to take swift action where anyone alleges poor care, neglect or abuse.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bolton Council and GMMHFT will provide the full response to concerns about community care coordination and agency roles.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Section 5 (3) The inquest heard that he had a care coordinator in the community. However, the care coordinator did not take a lead in ensuring he was being supported in the acute settings or that best interest meetings were taking place. There was a lack of understanding between agencies of role and responsibilities under the integrated care model.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Bolton-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and Bolton Council are responsible for responding to the report’s specific concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I expect the Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, the Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust and Bolton Council to carefully consider and respond to the specific concerns highlighted by your report. I am advised that Bolton NHS Foundation Trust and Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust have apologised for the lack of co-ordination in Mr Preston’s care while he was in hospital and the failure to conduct a formal assessment of Mr Preston’s mental capacity. You will know from the responses of the NHS trusts and Bolton Council to your report that they have worked together to resolve the matters of concern highlighted, with several actions taken to improve the co-ordination and quality of care for people with physical and mental health problems. I am pleased to see that learnings are being taken from the circumstances around Mr Preston’s care.”

    Source location

    2020-0110-Response-from-Department-of-Health-and-Social-Care.pdf
    Page 1 · response
    Published 9 June 2020

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026