Recurring concern

Unreliable social care referral pathways

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 16 Jan 2015•Latest report 30 Jan 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes dedicated failures in social care referral pathways, including referral identification, initiation, form or information requirements, allocation, prioritisation and response, where the failure risks a needed social care referral being delayed, misdirected or omitted.

Not included

  • Excludes generic workforce training deficiencies unless the training is specifically required for operating or safeguarding the social care referral pathway.
  • Excludes general social care capacity, placement or discharge-provision shortages that are not failures of the referral pathway.
  • Excludes referrals to unrelated services, including healthcare or mental health services, unless the assertion concerns a social care referral pathway.
Reports
15

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
19

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2015–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
35

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Bury Borough Council1
Cafcass1
Cann House Care Home1
Cardiff Council1
Care Quality Commission1
Department for Education1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Essex County Council1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Great Places Housing Association1
London Borough of Ealing1
London Borough of Islington1
Long Lartin Prison1
Manchester City Council1
Milton Keynes City Council1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Devon, Plymouth and Torbay

    AI-generated summary

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pamela George, aged 70, died at Derriford Hospital on 30 June 2023 after being urgently admitted with suspected sepsis. The report identified missed opportunities to carry out required blood tests, manage a breast infection, document and escalate a fall and medical concerns, assess and record capacity, and maintain relevant care-home policies and records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to appropriately escalate concerns to Adult Social Care

    Wider context from the report

    “3. It is likely that Miss George’s needs were too great for the care home and that the withdrawal of 1 to 1 supervision had an effect on the home’s ability to care for her. I do think it likely that she was unkempt because of the inability of staff to meet her needs as well as the sepsis This does not however remove the need for close monitoring of medical conditions and appropriate escalation policies to be followed and to happen. The home has been unable to provide me with evidence that they appropriately escalated concerns to Adult Social Care which may have resulted in additional care or Miss George being removed to another provider. ”

    Source location

    Pamela George · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind staff to document and communicate concerns to Social Workers and Adult Social Care throughout residency.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All staff have been reminded of the importance of documenting and communicating concerns to Social Workers and Adult Social Care, both at admission and throughout residency.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use a documented escalation procedure to notify placing authorities when needs may exceed home capability.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A documented escalation procedure now mandates notification to the placing authority where needs may exceed home capability.”

    Source location

    Response from Cann House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 February 2026

    Open published response
  2. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Barry Christopher Spooner · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Barry Christopher Spooner engaged with police after concerns that a woman was financially exploiting him to buy drugs. He was financially exploited until his death and was found at home having been murdered by the woman. The principal concern was insufficient information sharing from Nottinghamshire Police to the Local Authority, including that one Public Protection Notice was not referred to Adult Social Care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide previous PPNs to Adult Social Care when a current PPN is referred immediately

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Insufficient information sharing from Nottinghamshire Police to the Local Authority in the event of a public protection concern. I heard evidence about the new Vulnerability Policy followed by the police in order to try to improve information sharing between organisations. I was told that when a PPN is completed and sent to the MASH it is considered by an experienced officer who decides whether or not to refer it on to Adult Social Care for their consideration. If they decide not to refer onwards then the officer will consider all PPNs from the previous 12 months. If this review causes them to change their opinion then the current PPN and the previous PPNs will be referred onwards. This ensures Adult Social Care has all relevant information to help them decide upon the best course of action. In accordance with the Vulnerability Policy, it was explained to me that when a PPN is considered suitable for referral to Adult Social Care straight away then previous PPNs are not reviewed and sent on to Adult Social Care if they have not already had them. This means that in a scenario where there have been previous PPNs that have not been provided to Adult Social Care, then that team will not be aware of all of the relevant information when considering the referral from the MASH and the most appropriate course of action. This may impact upon Adult Social Care’s ability to make a proper decision in such cases and may put vulnerable people at more of a risk depending upon whether previous PPNs have been provided to Adult Social Care, or not. ”

    Source location

    Barry Christopher Spooner · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Amend information-sharing processes so referred PPNs include relevant previously unshared PPNs from the preceding 12 months, commencing 1 October 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will be amending our information sharing processes to address the concerns raised so that in the event that a PPN is considered suitable for referral to adult social care, these will be accompanied by any PPN’s from the previous 12 months which had not previously been deemed suitable for sharing.”

    Source location

    Response from Nottinghamshire Police
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response
  3. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Jake Brian BAKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jake Baker, who had learning disability and type 1 diabetes, developed diabetic ketoacidosis while staying with his family and died at home on 31 December 2019. The report identified concerns about inadequate pathway planning, risk assessment, information-sharing, diabetes support and advice to his family, as well as failures to assess his capacity and ensure appropriate care-leaver support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Confusing and delayed access to adult social care assessments for care leavers

    Wider context from the report

    “c.) The issue of how the numerous adult social care teams are accessed to obtain adult social care assessments for care leavers leads to confusion and delays. Vulnerable care leavers are at risk of being denied necessary support. ”

    Source location

    Jake Brian BAKER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out the formal local-authority assessment programme, including assessing Surrey County Council and using reported concerns to inform that assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Between May and November 2023, CQC completed 5 pilot local authority assessments, to test the associated assessment framework, methods and processes. In December 2023, CQC commenced a rollout of its formal local authority assessment programme.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    At the time of Mr Baker’s death, CQC lacked statutory powers to assess Surrey County Council or other local authorities.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the time of Mr. Baker’s death, CQC did not have any statutory powers in relation to the assessment of Surrey County Council or any other local authority.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing locality, specialist and contact-centre arrangements provide clear pathways for eligible care leavers seeking adult social care support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Our Adults, Wellbeing and Health Partnerships Directorate (AWHP) is made up of both locality and specialist teams. There is a locality team covering each specific geographic area across Surrey. The specialist teams are the Transition Team, Learning Disability and Autism Team and the Mental Health Teams. Both the locality teams and specialist teams offer a clear pathway into adult social care for those individuals meeting the eligibility criteria under the Care Act 2014.”

    Source location

    Response from Surrey County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2024

    Open published response
  4. Cumbria

    AI-generated summary

    Gerald Goodwin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gerald Goodwin, who had Alzheimer’s dementia and had consumed a significant amount of alcohol, was struck by a train while walking along a railway track on 10 November 2022; his death was confirmed at 00:17 on 11 November 2022. The principal concerns were that safeguarding and care-assessment referrals were rejected, closed, or not actioned, with multiple teams and systems failing to communicate effectively and potentially exposing other vulnerable adults to risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to generate required referrals before acknowledging notifications

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Fortunately, the Closure Team noticed that the Reablement Team were seeking to close a case in which another social worker had recommended a Care Assessment. They sent the case to the 'Short Term Allocation Tray'. This should have resulted in a referral but that did not happen. I am concerned that in a future case a referral might not be generated and a person's needs overlooked. The witness statement prepared by the Service Manager indicated 'we are looking at a way of ensuring that notifications requiring an action are only acknowledged once the task is complete'. This indicates that such work has not yet borne fruit and the risk still exists. ”

    Source location

    Gerald Goodwin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce decision-making guidance for Single Point of Access and practitioner teams, including timely collaborative decisions, multidisciplinary input and streamlined referral allocation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In respect of making improvements to the triaging process new guidance on ‘Decision Making for Single Point of Access and Practitioner Teams’ has also been introduced under the direction of the Principal Social Worker. This guidance was introduced in September 2023.”

    Source location

    Response from Adult Social Services
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish twice-daily multidisciplinary discussions to resolve concerns about incoming referrals and agree appropriate action promptly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• All duty officers for the day must prioritise participation in the twice daily SPA Multidisciplinary calls unless they are out on a duty visit.”

    Source location

    Response from Adult Social Services
    Page 2 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct a quality assurance and process-mapping review of reablement referrals to identify required improvements, including triage and delay reduction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Adult Social Care and Cumbria Care Services (who operate the reablement service) have set up a task and finish group to undertake a quality assurance review and to identify required process changes.”

    Source location

    Response from Adult Social Services
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require staff to acknowledge action-requiring case notes only after completing the requested task.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following completion of the witness statement a process was put in place in place and a directive was shared with Adult Social Care staff on 10th October 2023. This instructs staff that when they receive a case note asking for an action to be completed, the case note is only acknowledged once the task has been carried out. This will ensure that when there are competing demands for practitioners the case note notification will serve as a prompt and a task is not overlooked.”

    Source location

    Response from Adult Social Services
    Page 4 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct regular case-file audits of chronology and completed actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regular case file audits are already in place which do look at the case chronology to ensure that appropriate actions have been taken.”

    Source location

    Response from Adult Social Services
    Page 4 · response
    Published 22 November 2023

    Open published response
  5. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Stella Ann JAMES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stella Ann James, aged 40, died at the Royal Glamorgan Hospital on 20 January 2021 after being admitted with severe pneumonia and sepsis following severe food restriction, malnutrition and very low body weight. The principal concerns were that she appeared to meet the criteria for an adult at risk of neglect, without an apparent mechanism for Social Services to be aware of her status, and whether a register or anonymous referral mechanism could support unannounced social-work visits.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a mechanism for Social Services to become aware of adults at risk of neglect

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Stella appeared to meet the criteria as an ‘adult at risk of neglect’ due to her food avoidance and very low body weight, yet there was no apparent mechanism for Social Services to be aware of Stella’s status. Stella was very secretive and formally had capacity when assessed months before her death, although it is noted that this can fluctuate. (2) Could there be a register to include a person in Stella’s position, whereby unannounced house visits from a social worker can be an option? Perhaps involving a mechanism for anonymous referral? ”

    Source location

    Stella Ann JAMES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review current multi-agency referral and monitoring arrangements for vulnerable adults.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In this case the decision not to refer for social worker involvement was the correct one and, having reviewed current arrangements, all partners are confident that should such a referral be assessed as needed in a future case then the process is clear and unambiguous. There is also the potential that the creation of a much wider vulnerable adults list would give the misguided impression to someone referring an individual onto the register, that the individual would be safeguarded.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The decision not to refer for social work involvement was considered correct because existing referral processes were clear and appropriate.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In this case the decision not to refer for social worker involvement was the correct one and, having reviewed current arrangements, all partners are confident that should such a referral be assessed as needed in a future case then the process is clear and unambiguous. There is also the potential that the creation of a much wider vulnerable adults list would give the misguided impression to someone referring an individual onto the register, that the individual would be safeguarded.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A separate vulnerable-adults register was considered unnecessary because existing multi-agency monitoring and referral arrangements were sufficient and clearer.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In terms of holding a register of vulnerable adults more generally, we think that this could potentially negatively impact on the existing arrangements in place for appropriate multi agency involvement in future complex cases.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff Council
    Page 3 · response
    Published 2 July 2026

    Open published response
  6. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Molly Ann Sergeant · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Molly Ann Sergeant, aged 17, was found deceased on 16 October 2020 after hanging, having left a note. The report identifies concerns about delayed autism diagnosis, insufficient assessment and discharge planning, failures in social-care assessments and coordination, and a lack of understanding of her aftercare rights and chronic suicide risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to act on appropriate social care referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) Essex County Council did not: a. act on appropriate referrals to social care by Essex Partnership NHS Trust b. conduct required assessments of Molly during her detention c. did not appoint a social worker until after Molly was discharged There was a lack of understanding of the impact of Molly’s detention on her right to assessment as a child in need and how this changed during her detention under the Mental Health Act. ”

    Source location

    Molly Ann Sergeant · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver Section 117, Section 85, mental health and autism awareness training and awareness-raising for Children and Families staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In relation to training and awareness-raising sessions across Children and Families in respect of Section 117, Section 85 and autism awareness, there has been extensive mental health training that has taken place throughout 2021 and 2022 and the dates of this training were previously submitted to the Coroner. Further Section 117 training sessions took place in January 2023 and further courses are due to take place in May and July 2023. The Essex Social Care Academy is currently working on additional commissioning options in relation to further mental health training and autism awareness”

    Source location

    Response from Essex County Council
    Page 4 · response
    Published 10 March 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The acknowledged shortcomings were not causation or contributory factors in Molly’s death.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is not our view that these shortcomings, which we have fully acknowledged and have taken significant steps to ensure do not happen again, were causation factors or contributory factors which led to Molly’s very sad death.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex County Council
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 March 2023

    Open published response
  7. West London

    AI-generated summary

    Lance Scott Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Lance Scott Walker, an 18-year-old looked-after child, was placed in unregulated accommodation in 2016, where another 18-year-old resident was later placed. Eleven days after they were placed together, the other resident fatally stabbed Lance in the afternoon of 15 August 2016. Concerns included the use and oversight of unregulated accommodation, inadequate assessment and communication of the other resident’s risks and needs, shortcomings in placement and provider due diligence, and failures in information-sharing and management.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a standard referral form for supported housing service users aged 16-25

    Wider context from the report

    “2 Response requested from London Borough of Ealing, London Borough of Islington and the West London Alliance There is currently no standard referral form for service users aged 16-25 to be referred into supported housing. This means that best practise is not universally followed and it is more difficult for stakeholders to have to deal with a number of different forms. Vital information can potentially be missed and issues not highlighted when a variety of forms are used for the same referral procedure. Consideration should be given to adopting a standard form across the West London Alliance, or even a national standard using “best practise” as the benchmark, for clarity and ease of reference. ”

    Source location

    Lance Scott Walker · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Geoffrey Harrison HUTTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Geoffrey Harrison Hutton died by suicide in his cell at HMP Long Lartin on 8 February 2019 after hanging himself with a ligature made from a laundry-bag drawstring. He had significant hearing impairment, longstanding mental health and substance misuse issues, and was subject to an ACCT document. The substantive concerns included failures relating to social-care referral and support for his hearing and communication needs, ineffective ACCT case-manager oversight, and insufficient ACCT training for some staff carrying out observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the social care referral system to make referrals to the relevant Local Authority

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) No social care referral had been made for Mr. Hutton, despite the need for one having been identified soon after his arrival at HMP Long Lartin. This was because no effective system for making such referrals to the relevant Local Authority appeared to be in place at the prison at the time of these events. The Safer Custody team were responsible for making such referrals, but members of that team suggested in evidence that they had insufficient time to deal with such issues. The Safer Custody lead at the time of these events gave evidence as follows: (a) a social care referral, on the correct form as per the prison’s Adult Safeguarding Policy, was never made; (b) such a referral should have been made within days of Mr. Hutton’s arrival at the prison; (c) he was unable to explain why the system had broken down, but agreed that officers within his team had then, and continue to have insufficient time to devote to Equality & Disability issues; (d) there is still no training in place to ensure that officers are able to identify the need for a social care referral, and know how to make such a referral. ”

    Source location

    Geoffrey Harrison HUTTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of training for identifying and making social care referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) No social care referral had been made for Mr. Hutton, despite the need for one having been identified soon after his arrival at HMP Long Lartin. This was because no effective system for making such referrals to the relevant Local Authority appeared to be in place at the prison at the time of these events. The Safer Custody team were responsible for making such referrals, but members of that team suggested in evidence that they had insufficient time to deal with such issues. The Safer Custody lead at the time of these events gave evidence as follows: (a) a social care referral, on the correct form as per the prison’s Adult Safeguarding Policy, was never made; (b) such a referral should have been made within days of Mr. Hutton’s arrival at the prison; (c) he was unable to explain why the system had broken down, but agreed that officers within his team had then, and continue to have insufficient time to devote to Equality & Disability issues; (d) there is still no training in place to ensure that officers are able to identify the need for a social care referral, and know how to make such a referral. ”

    Source location

    Geoffrey Harrison HUTTON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the prison’s adult safeguarding policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the inquest, a review of the prison’s adult safeguarding policy was undertaken, and the prison is now working on a memorandum of understanding with Worcestershire County Council which will be completed by September 2021. The agreement sets out the strategic intent and joint commitment to improving the social care provision and procedures for those in custody.”

    Source location

    2021-0191-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete a memorandum of understanding with Worcestershire County Council to improve social care provision and procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the inquest, a review of the prison’s adult safeguarding policy was undertaken, and the prison is now working on a memorandum of understanding with Worcestershire County Council which will be completed by September 2021. The agreement sets out the strategic intent and joint commitment to improving the social care provision and procedures for those in custody.”

    Source location

    2021-0191-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and publish a directory of available social care interventions, including sensory impairment services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The prison is also developing a directory to be used by staff in order to identify the most appropriate interventions for those in custody. This is due to be published later this month and will feature all interventions available through Worcestershire Social Care and will include information about the sensory impairment team within the local authority. A new template for referrals is more user friendly and takes less time to complete. Posters have been displayed around the prison to promote the new template and policy, and when the memorandum of understanding has been completed a notice to staff will be issued to inform all staff of the new processes.”

    Source location

    2021-0191-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a more user-friendly social care referral template.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The prison is also developing a directory to be used by staff in order to identify the most appropriate interventions for those in custody. This is due to be published later this month and will feature all interventions available through Worcestershire Social Care and will include information about the sensory impairment team within the local authority. A new template for referrals is more user friendly and takes less time to complete. Posters have been displayed around the prison to promote the new template and policy, and when the memorandum of understanding has been completed a notice to staff will be issued to inform all staff of the new processes.”

    Source location

    2021-0191-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Display posters promoting the new referral template and safeguarding policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The prison is also developing a directory to be used by staff in order to identify the most appropriate interventions for those in custody. This is due to be published later this month and will feature all interventions available through Worcestershire Social Care and will include information about the sensory impairment team within the local authority. A new template for referrals is more user friendly and takes less time to complete. Posters have been displayed around the prison to promote the new template and policy, and when the memorandum of understanding has been completed a notice to staff will be issued to inform all staff of the new processes.”

    Source location

    2021-0191-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue a staff notice explaining the new social care processes after completing the memorandum of understanding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The prison is also developing a directory to be used by staff in order to identify the most appropriate interventions for those in custody. This is due to be published later this month and will feature all interventions available through Worcestershire Social Care and will include information about the sensory impairment team within the local authority. A new template for referrals is more user friendly and takes less time to complete. Posters have been displayed around the prison to promote the new template and policy, and when the memorandum of understanding has been completed a notice to staff will be issued to inform all staff of the new processes.”

    Source location

    2021-0191-Response-from-HMPPS_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 June 2021

    Open published response
  9. Milton Keynes

    AI-generated summary

    Roy Adrian CURTIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roy Adrian CURTIS, who had an autistic spectrum condition, was admitted after declaring an intention to take his own life and was later discharged without a formal multidisciplinary discharge plan. He died by suicide by hanging on or about 18 November 2018, and his body was discovered on 21 August 2019. The report raises concerns about the failure to complete an adult social care assessment and the overly bureaucratic procedure for urgent referrals, which did not give such referrals sufficient priority.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to give urgent adult social care assessment referrals sufficient priority within social services

    Wider context from the report

    “That the procedure for allocating and responding to a referral for an urgent adult social care assessment is overly bureaucratic and they are not afforded the priority within social services that they so obviously require. ”

    Source location

    Roy Adrian CURTIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Overly bureaucratic procedure for allocating and responding to urgent adult social care assessment referrals

    Wider context from the report

    “That the procedure for allocating and responding to a referral for an urgent adult social care assessment is overly bureaucratic and they are not afforded the priority within social services that they so obviously require. ”

    Source location

    Roy Adrian CURTIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed identification of inpatients needing social care support in discharge planning to enable timely assessment before discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mr Curtis should have been seen and offered an assessment whilst still an inpatient at the Campbell Centre, an approach that is now well embedded across health and social care. Identifying people who are in patients who need support are in discharge planning meetings and is now straightforward and should not be subject to any delays or unnecessary bureaucracy.”

    Source location

    2020-0272-Response-from-Milton-Keynes-Council-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Employ a link social worker for the acute mental health ward to coordinate required social care assessments before discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We recognise that we did not get our response right for Mr Curtis. We have learnt from his untimely death and have reviewed and improved our practice. There is now a link social worker employed to work with the acute mental health hospital ward who is responsible for coordinating social care assessments before discharge when needed.”

    Source location

    2020-0272-Response-from-Milton-Keynes-Council-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor team practice and monthly performance, including assessment timelines and casework reviews, through the Adult Leadership Team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will continue to monitor the practice of our teams, with a focus on learning and improving outcomes for vulnerable people. We formally review our performance each month via our Adult Leadership Team meeting, with Heads of Service responsible for the performance in their area. This monitoring includes the timelines for assessments and case work review.”

    Source location

    2020-0272-Response-from-Milton-Keynes-Council-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 5 January 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The out-of-hours team does not complete adult social care assessments; required assessments are referred to the Access Team.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Outside of office hours the Milton Keynes Council’s Out of hours Social Care responds to urgent requests for assistance. The team operates between 1700 and 0900 and at all hours over the weekends and bank holidays. The Out of Hours team do not complete ASC assessment but will deal with urgent matters e.g. a missing person, requests for additional care and Mental Health Act assessments. The Out of Hours Team will complete a referral into the Access Team should an adult social care assessment be required.”

    Source location

    2020-0272-Response-from-Milton-Keynes-Council-Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 January 2021

    Open published response
  10. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    June Mavis Winterbottom · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    June Mavis Winterbottom, aged 90, lived alone in sheltered accommodation and was found semi-conscious in her own faeces and vomit, covered in pressure sores, after an urgent Adult Social Care referral received no contact. She was taken to hospital and treated for urosepsis, but died later that day. The report identified ineffective urgent-referral handling, unclear accountability, and no safety net for calling an ambulance when Adult Social Care could not respond promptly.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of urgent referrals to receive a timely response

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The system for handling urgent referrals within Adult Social Care in Wakefield on 02/06/20 was ineffective. Despite being graded as ‘urgent’, no contact was made with an elderly, isolated, vulnerable lady, who was evidently in dire need of assistance (2) In consequence, Mrs Winterbottom was left alone without the medical assistance which would probably have been called in, had she been seen. It is, however, not possible to say whether her life would have been saved, had she been admitted to hospital on 02/06/20. (3) Even the following day, 03/06/20, no visit took place, despite the urgency of the situation. The urgent referral system was exposed as deficient. (4) Evidence taken at the Inquest indicated that the team in Adult Social Care were not aware of the need to watch out for such cases which had drifted outside of normal hours. Such a generalised instruction serves to diffuse responsibility, rather than establish accountability on the part of an identified manager. (5) There was no safety net in place, whereby an ambulance would have been called in the event the Adult Social Care team were unable to respond in a timely manner for any reason. ”

    Source location

    June Mavis Winterbottom · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a dedicated out-of-hours workforce system for handling referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At this time, WMDC Adult Social Care had realigned its workforce in order to support the Covid response as directed by the Department for Health and Social Care. In particular, the national guidance required Adult Social Care to facilitate urgent hospital discharges between 8am and 8pm, to ease the mounting pressure on overburdened hospitals. WMDC Adult Social Care had implemented a new system of workers covering referrals outside of usual working hours in the weeks prior to this referral being received. There were also further changes to usual working practices in that significant numbers of staff were working remotely from home due to the Covid situation. Nevertheless, action should have resulted from the referral during the evening of 2nd June 2020 and I offer my sincere apologies to Mrs Winterbottom’s family.”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Give Social Care Direct access to extended-hours rotas, staff mobile numbers and a manager escalation contact for urgent referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On the 3rd June 2020, senior managers worked immediately to improve the system.”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Embed a referral-transfer process requiring dashboard entry and direct confirmation with the worker on shift.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further work was then undertaken over the next four weeks to ensure that the referral transfer process was robust, with the following specific actions being implemented:”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and simplify the rota, adding contact numbers for workers, managers and teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The rota format was revised and simplified so that it is clearer to identify who is working.”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish an on-call rota identifying a manager responsible for out-of-hours periods.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A Team Managers on call rota was set up, to ensure that there was always a clearly identified manager responsible for out of hours, whether evenings or weekends.”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Distribute weekly rota emails with working arrangements and out-of-hours shift guidance, including instructions to check both Urgent Response Dashboards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A weekly email is distributed across the Adult Social Care service, containing the rota which in turn contains clear working arrangement guidance. It makes it clear who is working and when, and in what role.”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Enable all Adult Triage workers to view both East and West Urgent Response Dashboards and monitor submitted referrals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• We have ensured that all Adult Triage workers in Social Care Direct can view the Urgent Response Dashboards for both East and West to check the progress of any referrals they sent through.”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Instruct out-of-hours Approved Mental Health Professionals to check the Urgent Response Dashboard when starting evening duty.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Additionally, the Social Care Direct Manager has instructed the Out of Hours Approved Mental Health Professionals (“AMHP”) to check the Urgent Response dashboard when they come on duty in the evening (although it is recognised that they will always have to prioritise Mental Health Act assessments over other work).”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require core-hours Urgent Response workers to communicate follow-up requirements directly to extended-hours workers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The Urgent Response workers covering core hours will directly communicate with the extended hours workers regarding anything which needs following up from the day.”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 3 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Adult Social Care considers its reviewed and strengthened systems sufficiently robust, so no additional actions are required following the report.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I trust that the above information addresses the matters of concern you raise, and provides sufficient reassurance that Adult Social Care in Wakefield have already appropriately reviewed our systems following the death of Mrs Winterbottom, and taken action to ensure the robustness of our systems. As a consequence, Adult Social Care do not feel that there are any additional actions which need to be taken resulting from your issuance of the Regulation 28 Report.”

    Source location

    2020-0183-Response-from-Wakefield-Council_Redacted.pdf
    Page 4 · response
    Published 19 November 2020

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026