Recurring concern

Unreliable healthcare patient transfer processes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Sep 2013•Latest report 24 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in healthcare transfer procedures, coordination, responsibility, transfer documentation and provision of complete clinical information to the transporting or receiving team.

Not included

  • Ordinary shift handover with no transfer of the patient or care responsibility
  • Clinical treatment failures after a safe and complete transfer
  • Discharge to the community where no healthcare transfer process is involved
Reports
103

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
131

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
151

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England14
Department of Health and Social Care10
University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust5
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB4
HM Prison and Probation Service4
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust4
Swansea Bay University Local Health Board4
University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust4
Welsh Government4
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust3
Healthcare Inspectorate Wales3
Stockport NHS Foundation Trust3
Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust2
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust2
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Marina May Raisbeck · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Marina May Raisbeck died on 7 November 2023 at Doncaster Royal Infirmary from sepsis secondary to a perianal abscess. The report identifies concerns about the lack of systems to prioritise urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer and to monitor their clinical parameters at Bassetlaw District General Hospital.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a system for prioritisation of urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer

    Wider context from the report

    “1. The lack of a system for prioritisation of urgent surgical patients awaiting transfer to DRI from the Emergency Department at Bassetlaw District General Hospital ”

    Source location

    Mrs Marina May Raisbeck · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct daily face-to-face clinical assessments of surgical patients awaiting transfer to prioritise transfers and monitor blood tests.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To enhance this standard, the Trust has immediately implemented a new initiative in Bassetlaw Hospital whereby every morning a Surgical Advanced Clinical Practitioner will undertake a face to face assessment of all surgical patients awaiting transfer to Doncaster Royal Infirmary in order to prioritise transfer. This assessment will include a full clinical review including monitoring blood tests.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and roll out a digital tracking system monitoring referred patients’ physiology, sepsis parameters and observations for clinical-team oversight and prioritisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has successfully developed a tracking system which provides oversight to the host and receiving clinical teams and monitors the patient’s physiology parameters (including sepsis) and observations. It also enables clinical teams to prioritise patient care. This digital programme of work has already been rolled out in Acute Medicine and Paediatrics on both Bassetlaw and Doncaster Hospital sites to allow them to easily view all patients in the ED that have been referred to them.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Tailor the tracking system to orthopaedic standards and complete its implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Discussions are nearing completion with our orthopaedic team to tailor the tracking system to reflect their standards of care and implementation is expected to be complete within 3-6 months.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss implementation of the tracking system with wider specialties for surgical patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Meanwhile, further discussions with our wider specialties are commencing to implement the tracker for our surgical patients.”

    Source location

    Response from Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 May 2025

    Open published response
  2. Worcestershire

    AI-generated summary

    Katrina Veronica Francesca Insley · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Katrina Insley died on 1 January 2024 at Alexandra Hospital, Redditch, from sepsis due to an infected pressure sore and pneumonia. The report identified concerns about the absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and the Neighbourhood Team, limited access to hospital records, and the resulting risk of delayed recognition and treatment of pressure sores, infection and sepsis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and Neighbourhood Team

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The absence of a formal, documented handover system between hospital and Neighbourhood Team and the fact that the NT cannot simply check hospital records of patients with pressure sores to verify their condition without specifically requesting records creates the potential for the NT to fail to appreciate the true condition of a patient’s pressure sores when they are discharged from hospital and follow up to be delayed. This increases the risk of wound infection and consequent sepsis. (2) I am informed (letter received from HWHT on 31.1.25) that there are established handover procedures and that a statement of practice is being drafted to “formalise” the referral requirements between hospital and NT. I am informed also that an App is being developed which can be used to record and check the condition of pressure sores and that it has the potential to be used across acute and community services. I do not consider that these proposals are sufficiently detailed, precise and concluded to address the concerns that I have expressed. ”

    Source location

    Katrina Veronica Francesca Insley · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop a handover form containing wound-care advice drawn from electronic patient-record and Tissue Viability records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Acute Trust have developed a handover form (copy attached), which will detail wound care advice taken from the information on ‘Sunrise’ within the nursing and Tissue Viability records. This will be sent home with the patient and therefore will be available for them to share with professionals who attend their home, as an additional source of information alongside the Electronic Patient Record system.”

    Source location

    Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Send the wound-care handover form home with discharged patients for sharing with professionals providing care at home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, the Acute Trust have developed a handover form (copy attached), which will detail wound care advice taken from the information on ‘Sunrise’ within the nursing and Tissue Viability records. This will be sent home with the patient and therefore will be available for them to share with professionals who attend their home, as an additional source of information alongside the Electronic Patient Record system.”

    Source location

    Response from Herefordshire and Worcestershire Health and Care NHS Trust and Worcestershire Acute Hospitals Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 February 2025

    Open published response
  3. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    William Charles Hare (Bill) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Charles Hare (Bill) presented with abdominal and left loin pain in November 2022 and was subsequently diagnosed with metastatic urothelial cancer. He died in a hospice on 23 January 2024 after delays in diagnosis and treatment, including delays in biopsy, specialist review, MDT consideration, hospital transfer and scan results. The report identified systemic and procedural errors and ineffective coordination between Basildon and Southend Hospitals as substantive concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failures to organise and coordinate inter-hospital transport

    Wider context from the report

    “vi. In his last admission to Basildon Hospital between November 2023 and January 2024 there were delays in progressing his treatment due to the disjointed nature of the inter-relationship between Basildon and Southend Hospitals as well as delays in transporting him to Southend Hospital which included failures to organise transport and properly coordinate his transfer. ”

    Source location

    William Charles Hare (Bill) · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The transfer delay did not affect the clinical outcome because appropriate care was provided at Basildon Hospital.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge that there were issues with inter hospital transfers and delays, however in this case transferring from Basildon to Southend had no bearing on the clinical outcome as Mr Hare was receiving appropriate care in Basildon HDU. However, we appreciate there should have been better communication at this time with the patient and his family. Should a patient require urgent transfer for specific treatment this is prioritised by the Trust and the East of England ambulance service.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Urgent transfers are prioritised by the Trust and East of England ambulance service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge that there were issues with inter hospital transfers and delays, however in this case transferring from Basildon to Southend had no bearing on the clinical outcome as Mr Hare was receiving appropriate care in Basildon HDU. However, we appreciate there should have been better communication at this time with the patient and his family. Should a patient require urgent transfer for specific treatment this is prioritised by the Trust and the East of England ambulance service.”

    Source location

    Response from Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 6 January 2025

    Open published response
  4. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Norma Ann Patricia Tellam · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Norma Ann Patricia Tellam suffered a fall causing a proximal femoral fracture and underwent surgery, followed by rehabilitation and further surgery after problems developed with the metalwork. She later suffered an upper gastrointestinal bleed and died on 16 April 2023. Concerns included transfers between hospitals that did not give sufficient weight to continuity of clinical care and did not return her to the hospital responsible for her orthopaedic follow-up.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to give sufficient weight to continuity of clinical care in transfer decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Although Mrs Tellam was under the care of Royal Cornwall Hospital and awaiting a post operation follow up, when clinical staff at Liskeard Community Hospital had concerns about a possible infection at the site of the surgery Mrs Tellam was taken to Derriford Hospital rather than to the orthopaedic team at the Royal Cornwall Hospital who had recently operated on her. 2. When Mrs Tellam had recovered from a chest infection she was transferred from Derriford to Liskeard Community Hospital for further rehabilitation rather than to the Royal Cornwall Hospital for follow up on the developing problems with the fixing metalwork at the site of the hip surgery. 3. Decisions relating to the transfer of Mrs Tellam between Liskeard Community Hospital and Derriford Hospital did not give sufficient weight to continuity of clinical care. ”

    Source location

    Norma Ann Patricia Tellam · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Transfer to Derriford Hospital was correct because urgent assessment was required and it provided the closest prompt access to acute care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Liskeard Community Hospital ‘faces’ the University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust (UHP). This means that when a patient in south east Cornwall requires urgent transfer to an emergency acute setting, the hospital commissioned to provide care and treatment to patients, is Derriford Hospital. This hospital is the closest in mileage in comparison to the emergency facility at Royal Cornwall Hospital in Truro (RCHT).”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust and Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The assessing ambulance crew has paramount responsibility for the clinical decision about a patient's conveyance destination.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “On occasion, if it is considered by community hospital staff that a particular hospital would be a more appropriate transfer destination to ensure continuity of care, this can be shared when the 999 call is made. However, clinical decision-making by the assessing ambulance crew is paramount when considering where to convey a patient.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust and Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Community-based care and transfer to Liskeard were appropriate because there was no urgent need for orthopaedic revision surgery.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Mrs Tellam’s care was discussed by CFT and UHP, and it was noted that, during the acute admission, she did not have an urgent need for orthopaedic revision surgery. She had been unwell due to a chest infection and then unfortunately caught covid during her admission. The UHP management plan was for her to have a period of recuperation after her chest infection and prior to consideration of any revision/further surgery on her hip. During that time the aim was for Mrs Tellam to be”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust and Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 December 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Transfers between Liskeard Community Hospital and Derriford Hospital were appropriate and reasonable based on the patient's clinical presentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “When considering the clinical information from the period of care being reviewed, the transfers between Liskeard Community Hospital and UHP were appropriate based on Mrs Tellam’s clinical presentation. Whilst Liskeard Community Hospital was further away from Mrs Tellam’s home, this was unfortunately the only available setting for Mrs Tellam at the time when a community hospital was considered appropriate for her clinical needs.”

    Source location

    Response from Royal Cornwall Hospital NHS Trust and Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust and University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust
    Page 5 · response
    Published 3 December 2024

    Open published response
  5. Coventry and Warwickshire

    AI-generated summary

    John Frederick Doyle · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Frederick Doyle, a kidney transplant recipient, was admitted with rectal bleeding and a persistent cough and was later diagnosed with a severe cytomegalovirus infection after delays in testing, diagnosis and transfer to specialist care. He deteriorated to multiple organ failure and died on 30 December 2023. Concerns included unclear arrangements for contacting specialist centres, sharing information, accessing renal guidance, initiating transfers and coordinating care between specialist and non-specialist hospitals.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of consistent understanding of responsibility for initiating patient transfers

    Wider context from the report

    “Concern 4: Transfer Responsibility There may be some inconsistency across non-specialist hospitals and renal hospitals in understanding who is responsible for initiating patient transfers. ”

    Source location

    John Frederick Doyle · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Collaborate to produce recommendations addressing specialist contact, information sharing, renal care access, responsibility and care-location concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following your email request received on 12th November 2024, the UK Kidney Association (UKKA; formerly the Renal Association) and the British Transplantation Society (BTS) have collaborated and produced the following recommendations in response to your concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from UKKA and BTS
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Make UHCW the primary specialist transfer centre and accept all renal patients admitted to GEH, regardless of their parent hospital.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SLA which provides that a renal specialist will attend GEH on request should help identify those patients requiring urgent transfer. UHCW will be responsible to accept all renal patients admitted to GEH, regardless of their parent hospital. In addition, the internal processes to highlight which patients need urgent transfer have been changed (we now have a daily huddle at 11.30am with the UHCW Medicine Operational team where a renal doctor is present, so that interhospital transfers can be highlighted and appropriately prioritised).”

    Source location

    Response 1 from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate a daily 11:30am huddle with the Medicine Operational team, including a renal doctor, to identify and prioritise interhospital transfers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The SLA which provides that a renal specialist will attend GEH on request should help identify those patients requiring urgent transfer. UHCW will be responsible to accept all renal patients admitted to GEH, regardless of their parent hospital. In addition, the internal processes to highlight which patients need urgent transfer have been changed (we now have a daily huddle at 11.30am with the UHCW Medicine Operational team where a renal doctor is present, so that interhospital transfers can be highlighted and appropriately prioritised).”

    Source location

    Response 1 from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree referral indications and referral routes with George Eliot Hospital for specialist renal input.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We confirm that staff at UHCW are aware of internal escalation routes. The escalation of concerns is via the renal registrar and renal consultant. We confirm that UHCW has shared and agreed with George Eliot Hospitals the indications for referral to us as a specialist unit, and the routes for referral.”

    Source location

    Response 2 from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide onsite renal consultant inpatient review at George Eliot Hospital and South Warwickshire Foundation Trust under service-level agreements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is an established and effective process for referring patients who are receiving dialysis to their parent unit. UHCW has Service Level Agreements with George Eliot Hospital and with South Warwickshire Foundation Trust that UHCW will provide onsite Renal Consultant Specialist inpatient review at GEH and SWFT upon request up to twice a week. Additionally, UHCW has worked with UK Kidney Association and agreed to be the primary specialist transfer centre for all renal transplant patients admitted from referring hospitals regardless of their parent specialist unit.”

    Source location

    Response 2 from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Act as the primary specialist transfer centre for renal patients admitted to peripheral hospitals, regardless of their parent specialist unit.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is an established and effective process for referring patients who are receiving dialysis to their parent unit. UHCW has Service Level Agreements with George Eliot Hospital and with South Warwickshire Foundation Trust that UHCW will provide onsite Renal Consultant Specialist inpatient review at GEH and SWFT upon request up to twice a week. Additionally, UHCW has worked with UK Kidney Association and agreed to be the primary specialist transfer centre for all renal transplant patients admitted from referring hospitals regardless of their parent specialist unit.”

    Source location

    Response 2 from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Accept responsibility for recommending the best care location for patients referred to Renal Services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We accept the responsibility for recommending best location for all patients referred to Renal Services. Based on the clinical requirements patients could be transferred to UHCW or reviewed by the UHCW renal consultant at the local hospital and transferred over later if necessary.”

    Source location

    Response 2 from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain the consultant-to-consultant referral process for renal specialist advice and patient transfers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Making staff aware of the referral process asking UHCW renal staff to visit a patient on the ward | This is in the guidelines and is a consultant to consultant referral process. The process has been shared as per above.”

    Source location

    Response 1 from George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Oversight of delegated renal medicine services rests with individual Integrated Care Boards, including Coventry and Warwickshire ICB.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Renal medicine is a specialist service that is delegated to individual Integrated Care Boards. My regional colleagues in the Midlands have been sighted on your Report, and have shared it with Coventry and Warwickshire ICB, for the appropriate oversight.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Providers involved in the care should respond to concerns about local arrangements and processes, rather than NHS England.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “I note that your Report has also been sent to University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust (UHCW) and George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust (GEH). It is appropriate that the providers involved in John’s care respond to the Coroner regarding the concerns raised which relate to local arrangements and process. NHS England has asked to be sighted on their responses once these are in due course and whether any further actions are required from our Specialised Commissioning Teams.”

    Source location

    Response from NHS England
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The agreed guidelines, service-level agreement and related processes are considered sufficient to address the six concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you are aware from the evidence of the medical witnesses at the inquest on 8 November 2024, the renal team at UHCW have been developing guidelines to assist George Eliot Hospital (GEH), a non-renal specialist hospital, in the management of acutely unwell kidney transplant renal inpatients. We are pleased to report that these guidelines have been finalised and agreed between the Trusts and we enclose a copy.”

    Source location

    Response 1 from Coventry and Warwickshire Partnership Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing consultant-to-consultant transfer arrangements and the renal specialist service-level agreement are considered sufficient for transferring patients when required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. Transfer Responsibility Consultant to consultant clinical conversations will take place if there is a requirement to transfer the patient to the renal centre. There is a Service Level Agreement (SLA) in place for a renal specialist from UHCW to visit renal patients being cared for at a GEH, twice a week. This patient familiarisation will assist in the timely transfer process should the patient need to be relocated to the specialist centre.”

    Source location

    Response 1 from George Eliot Hospital NHS Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2024

    Open published response
  6. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Margaret Horgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Margaret Horgan fell at home and sustained a traumatic cervical spinal injury with fracture dislocation and severe spinal cord compression. After delays and communication difficulties surrounding MRI interpretation and the Patient Pass referral system, she was transferred to hospital and placed on end-of-life care, dying on 5 June 2023. The principal concern was uncertainty and confusion between medical teams about how Patient Pass operated, which could put patients’ lives at risk.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of shared understanding and expectations between medical teams about how Patient Pass operates

    Wider context from the report

    “Whist the inquest found, on the evidence, that the transfer of Mrs Horgan between hospitals without an Aspen collar and spinal precautions as advised did not significantly contribute to her death, the obvious disparity revealed by the evidence between the two medical teams of their respective understanding and expectations of the way in which Patient Pass operates serves to create uncertainty and confusion and could easily give rise to a situation where the lives of patients may be put at risk. ”

    Source location

    Mary Margaret Horgan · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Convene a cross-Trust working group, review the incident, and agree actions to improve understanding and operation of Patient Pass.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has convened a working group, including ████████, Consultant Vascular Radiologist and lead for Quality and Patient Safety from MFT to discuss how we can improve and strengthen communication between the Trusts, and to gain input and perspective from MFT as an external referrer. This group has reviewed this incident, and agreed a number of actions to both improve understanding of the Patient Pass system and improve the system itself to reduce the likelihood of recurrence of such an incident.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise and circulate a communications guide clarifying Patient Pass purposes and referrer and receiver responsibilities across Greater Manchester hospitals.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As a result, we have prepared a communications guide, which outlines the purpose of Patient Pass and clarifies the responsibilities of referrers and receivers. This document is due to be finalised shortly and will be circulated across Greater Manchester hospitals via their Medical Directors.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add a new-user Patient Pass screen explaining user responsibilities and requiring acceptance before system access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to assist with improving the operation of Patient Pass, the Trust is collaborating with the Patient Pass developers to make changes to the system as follows:”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create, consult on, and circulate a seven-minute Greater Manchester briefing sharing learning on applying transfer policies and using Patient Pass.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In line with a request from the Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board, the Trusts are creating a seven-minute briefing document to share learning across Greater Manchester regarding the need to fully apply our transfer policies and to highlight the learning around the use of the Patient Pass system. We will consult with Dr Dare Seriki to prepare and circulate this in October 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Northern Care Alliance
    Page 3 · response
    Published 12 August 2024

    Open published response
  7. Dorset

    AI-generated summary

    Frazer Charlie Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Frazer Charlie Williams was found deceased on 7 March 2022 in his cell at HMP Guys Marsh, suspended by a ligature. The report identifies concerns about delays transferring prisoners requiring mental health hospital care, inadequate arrangements for managing self-neglect and healthcare handovers, shortcomings in ACCT monitoring and reviews, and other prison care and safety processes. The inquest concluded that he died by suicide in circumstances where there was inadequate assessment and monitoring of his risks of self-harm and suicide prior to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of national guidance for healthcare handover to receiving prisons

    Wider context from the report

    “iv. There is a lack of national guidance for healthcare teams working in prisons around the handover of healthcare of a prisoner to the receiving prison when they are transferred to another prison. ”

    Source location

    Frazer Charlie Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 6 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Other report recipients are responsible for addressing prison healthcare guidance, ACCT operations and family engagement because these concern day-to-day prison operations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regard to the other concerns you have raised around a lack of national guidance relating to a range of healthcare issues in prison settings; operational issues regarding the ACCT process and engagement with prisoners’ family members, I would expect the other recipients of your report to address these in their responses, as they are responsible for matters relating to day to day operations within prison settings. I look forward to seeing their responses and working with them where appropriate, to avoid a repetition of the horrific events of this case.”

    Source location

    Response from DHSC
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 June 2024

    Open published response
  8. South Yorkshire (Western)

    AI-generated summary

    Craig John BURFIELD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Craig Burfield was admitted for surgery for bladder stones on 20 February 2023 and underwent surgery on 23 February 2023. He did not regain consciousness from the anaesthetic and died on 24 February 2023 at Northern General Hospital, Sheffield, following clots in his hydrocephalus shunt and cerebral sinus that caused brain swelling. The report raised concerns that shunt care did not continue into adulthood and that there were no effective transition, transfer, or review pathways for adults with such needs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a transfer protocol or pathway for transition from childhood to adulthood

    Wider context from the report

    “During evidence from the family and ████████, author of the internal investigation, it became clear that although Craig had received care for the shunts implanted as a consequence of his hydrocephalus as a young person, this did not continue as an adult. Also, there was no process for review of patients such as Craig. ████████ gave evidence that there remained no transfer protocol or pathway in place as children move into adulthood as at the current date nor an effective review process for adults at the present time. In evidence she stated that it was important that a clear pathway, including for transitions between childhood and adulthood, was in place and a failure to have such clear pathways and protocols such that people who needed care could easily access it could potentially be fatal. ”

    Source location

    Craig John BURFIELD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Operate an agreed cross-trust transition pathway covering records, individual plans, transfer information and attendance at the first adult appointment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We acknowledge that the arrangements for transition have not been as robust as they could have been, and we have been working hard to address this. The current transition process is reflected in the SCFT and STHFT Transition Policy and the Cross Trust Transition pathway which have been agreed between the two organisations (enclosed). The Cross Trust Transition pathway details the process followed by both organisations and includes:”

    Source location

    Response from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide specialist transition-team support, including multidisciplinary discussions and assistance with initial adult appointments or inpatient ward visits for young people with complex needs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support the transition process there are specialist transition teams at SCFT and STHFT; these teams work closely together to support young people with complex healthcare needs who are transitioning from child to adult healthcare. For patients with complex needs the Transition Teams facilitate a multi-disciplinary team discussion with the receiving specialities to ensure appropriate arrangements are in place. Where appropriate the STH Transition Team would also support with the initial appointment(s) in adult services and where there are likely to be inpatient admissions, arrange visits to the relevant wards.”

    Source location

    Response from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run a monthly transition clinic for hydrocephalus patients aged 14 and over, with extended appointments covering clinical review and transition preparation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For young people with shunts SCFT runs a monthly transition clinic where all hydrocephalus patients 14 years old and over are seen by clinical nurse specialists. The more complex hydrocephalus patients or those with other neurological conditions are followed up in a Consultant Neurosurgeon’s clinic and they will start to discuss transition with them from around 14 years old as per the SCFT and STHFT Transition Policy. These visits require longer appointment times as they cover a hydrocephalus check and discuss preparation for transition. At the last appointment before transition the patient is provided with contact details for the Neurosurgical secretaries so that they know who to contact if they have any concerns about their symptoms between appointments in the adult service.”

    Source location

    Response from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formalise the transition process in a written pathway clarifying how young people with shunts move from children’s to adult services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the concern raised by Craig’s inquest, we will formalise the process with a written pathway so that it is clear to both SCFT and STHFT what process these young people will follow when transitioning to adult services. This will be complete by September 2024.”

    Source location

    Response from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Participate in the regional innovator project to standardise developmentally appropriate transition care, including defined roles, staff training, personalised plans and patient tracking.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Early in 2023 the South Yorkshire & Bassetlaw Acute Federation Trust Paediatric Innovator Programme was established, which includes a project on standardising developmentally appropriate healthcare for young people with chronic or complex conditions transitioning from paediatric to adult secondary care. This is a provider collaboration between STHFT, SCFT, Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and The Rotherham NHS Foundation Trust. It is one of nine national provider collaborative innovators.”

    Source location

    Response from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Routine shunt reviews are not clinically required after transition; patients remain able to seek advice about symptoms or concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “There is no clinical requirement for the routine review of shunts, however during appointments both before and after transfer, patients and/or their families are made aware of the signs and symptoms of a blocked shunt and what action they should take. If, following transition, a decision is made that further routine follow-up is not required, the patient will stay active on the neurosurgery pathway. Patients will be provided with contact details, so that the patient and family are aware of who to contact, including the Consultant’s secretary, for non-urgent enquiries or the on-call Neurosurgeon for urgent enquiries.”

    Source location

    Response from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals
    Page 2 · response
    Published 15 April 2024

    Open published response
  9. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Alan Richard Miles Davies · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alan Richard Miles Davies was transferred to HMP Cardiff after 16 days of refusing food and was found collapsed in his cell 10 days later; he later died in hospital. The reported concerns included inadequate communication and handover of information, insufficient care planning and observation, the absence of a food and fluid refusal policy, inadequate staffing, and missed opportunities to escalate his care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate relevant clinical information before transfer

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was limited communication between the Caswell clinic and HMP Cardiff following the s 117 meeting until Mr Davies’ discharge. In particular, information that Mr Davies had commenced food refusal following the s 117 meeting and that it had not been possible to assess him physically prior to transfer was not clearly communicated to HMP Cardiff before the transfer occurred ”

    Source location

    Alan Richard Miles Davies · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and establish a standard operating procedure for communicating health information and determining appropriate placement before transfers to HMP Cardiff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding communication pathways, collaborative efforts with relevant parties have led to the development of a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for transferring individuals with mental/physical health needs into our care. This SOP delineates the necessary information required by HMP Cardiff to assess the individual's health needs and outlines a reliable route for sharing information across organisations to mitigate information-related risks. The protocol also identifies”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 March 2024

    Open published response
  10. Suffolk

    AI-generated summary

    Dennis John William KING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dennis John William KING suffered a myocardial infarction after experiencing chest pain on 9 December 2022 and died on 13 December 2022 following recognised complications of emergency treatment. The report raised concerns about delays in ambulance responses and inter-hospital transfers, confusion over transfer categorisation, and the adequacy of arrangements for urgent care at regional specialist centres.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clarity in the categorisation process for urgent inter-hospital transfers

    Wider context from the report

    “a. Availability of ambulances to carry out transfers in a timely manner, in urgent cases, between NHS Hospitals and in responding to 999 and 111 calls in the community. b. Confusion as between ambulance and hospital staff and a lack of clarity in the purpose of and process for the categorisation of transfers (particularly in urgent situations) between NHS hospitals. c. The suitability of the NHS approach to centralising exigent care in regional centres (such as the Royal Papworth Hospital for cardiac conditions) if the means to deliver such an approach are inadequate. d. Adequacy of the action plan provided to the court in addressing the concern at (a) above and that of ambulance attendances to 999 and 111 calls; the plan is generalised, lacking detail and any means of measurement of progress. Evidence received at Inquest identified waits for ambulance attendance of between 5-6 hours on the evening of 9th/10th December 2022. This, in circumstances where there call relating to Mr. KING had been categorised as a category 2 response. In Mr. KING’s case he was exhibiting symptoms of having suffered/was suffering a heart attack. In Mr. KING’s case he had arrived at hospital been triaged, assessed and arrangements for urgent lifesaving care made by competent emergency clinicians in conjunction with experts from the regional cardiac unit. This included the requirement for an urgent transfer to the regional cardiac centre. A request for an emergency transfer from West Suffolk Hospital to The Royal Papworth Hospital was subject to further computer algorithm-based triage by the ambulance service. This resulted in a several hour delay to Mr. KING’s transfer, notwithstanding the protests from competent clinical staff in the Accident and Emergency Department at West Suffolk Hospital. The circumstances of this case raise concerns about the NHS approach to centralising exigent care in regional centres (such as the Royal Papworth Hospital for cardiac conditions) if the means to deliver the approach are inadequate. East of England Ambulance Service provided evidence to the Inquest, including a Report concerning its response. This plan is generalised, lacking detail and any means of measurement of progress and is inadequate in addressing the concerns raised at the Inquest. ”

    Source location

    Dennis John William KING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain and update the national framework for inter-facility ambulance transfers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The National framework for inter-facility transfers was published by NHS England in July 2019 and updated in March 2021. The framework is intended for patients who require transfer by ambulance between facilities due to an increase in either their medical or nursing care need. The framework states that patients going directly to theatre for primary percutaneous coronary intervention should receive an IFT Level 2 (IFT2) Category 2 response and that the clinical staff responsible for the patient”

    Source location

    Response from NHS Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review the National Framework for Inter-Facility Transfers with NHS England in light of the death.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The National Framework for Inter-Facility Transfers is produced by NHS England and we will endeavour to review this framework with NHS England in light of Mr King’s death.”

    Source location

    Response from East of England Ambulance Service
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 January 2024

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026