Recurring concern

Inadequate safety-netting advice for patients and carers

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 6 May 2016•Latest report 10 Nov 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of safety-netting advice provided to patients, parents, carers or receiving care providers after assessment, treatment, discharge or reported deterioration, including advice that is absent, delayed, undocumented, unclear or not tailored to a material suspected condition.

Not included

  • Excludes failures of clinical assessment, monitoring, diagnosis or treatment where no safety-netting advice deficiency is identified.
  • Excludes generic communication or documentation failures that are not specifically part of safety-netting.
  • Excludes staffing, workload or workforce wellbeing concerns unless the report directly identifies their effect on safety-netting provision.
  • Excludes emergency call-system or escalation-process deficiencies that do not concern advice given to patients, carers or receiving care providers.
Reports
29

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
30

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2016–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
24

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

NHS England6
Department of Health and Social Care5
Barts Health NHS Trust2
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1
Bristol NHS Foundation Trust1
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital1
Denton Medical Practice1
East Riding of Yorkshire Council1
Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust1
Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Essex

    AI-generated summary

    Johanne Blackwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Johanne Blackwood, known as Jo, died by suicide on 12 June 2021 after placing herself in the path of a train. The report identified concerns about unclear Care Coordinator handovers and responsibility for oversight after discharge, the absence of an allocated Care Coordinator for several weeks, failure to update her risk assessment, care plan and security plan, and inappropriate over-reliance on family members to keep her safe.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure safety-netting when a Care Coordinator is absent

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Evidence confirmed a conspicuous lack of clarity as to who, amongst EPUT clinicians/staff, has the responsibility for oversight of patient care following discharge, including responsibility for ensuring adequate and appropriate safety-netting is in place in the event of relapse, where a Care Coordinator is no longer in place/has not been replaced. Please note that this 3ʳᵈ concern was previously raised by me with ████████ CEO of EPUT (and in very similar terms) in a PFDR dated 25.02.2022 following the death of Stephanie Moyce. ”

    Source location

    Johanne Blackwood · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement and use a Trust-wide electronic Care Coordinator to Care Coordinator Transfer of Care Document for structured handovers and continuity oversight.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of the Inquest hearing, it was recommended by yourself, as the presiding Coroner, that the operational management at Essex Partnership University Foundation Trust (EPUT) consider establishing a mechanism and process for a formal structured handover between care coordinators. The service manager took this recommendation on board and has been working with colleagues and departments to produce a purposeful template that will form part of the Patient Electronic Record specific to the care coordinators’ handover. This document has been approved, for implementation Trust wide, following a process of consultation and with comments gathered from all community services.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Fondation Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide direct clinician contact and prioritised MDT support, including safe-hours overtime, for patients awaiting an allocated care coordinator.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In the event that a new care coordinator is not available, the team ensure that those patients without an allocated care coordinator have direct contact from clinicians within the team. This is done through a clinical MDT approach; patients are prioritised according to their presenting need and contact is through the use of creating from the Duty Person and Buddy worker System. In addition the staff have opportunities to work additional safe hours, by way of overtime which includes weekends and evenings so that all patients have a timely review by a practitioner avoiding any extended gaps in care whilst a care coordinator is appointed.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Fondation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing caseload oversight, risk prioritisation and clinician contact arrangements satisfactorily address gaps when patients lack an allocated care coordinator.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Community Mental Health Team (CMHT) based at Grays Hall, as well as CMHT teams across the Trust have access to the Team caseloads via the Trust Intranet system “Client Information Website” which provides a breakdown of all patients open to the team. The feature provides further information on the full team case list which denotes allocated care coordinators and those who have not assigned a care coordinator yet. The team manager and team leads, are able to utilise this tool to have an oversight of team caseloads alongside the Management and Supervision Tool (MaST). This system allows for Trust wide access and scrutiny on case load requirements.”

    Source location

    Response from Essex Partnership University NHS Fondation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Elliott James Harratt · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elliott James Harratt was born at the family home following his mother's early labour, transferred to Tameside General Hospital, and died there on 29 January 2023 from extreme prematurity. The inquest identified concerns that expectant mothers were not given clear, readily accessible information about sensitising events requiring Anti-D treatment or when to contact maternity triage; this matter did not contribute to Elliott's death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to clearly communicate sensitising events and the required Anti-D action

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard evidence that the rhesus status of Elliott’s mum meant that after a sensitising event Anti D needed to be given to prevent Rhesus disease in a newborn baby. The evidence before the inquest was that the type of events that would constitute a sensitising event and what action was then required were not made clear to Elliott’s mum. In addition, the type of events where a call to maternity triage for advice were not made clear to his mum. This was, the evidence suggested, because there was no readily accessible or consistent list given to expectant mothers at booking in appointments or at follow up signposting them. Such a document in the form of a handout laminate or as a list in the handheld notes would increase awareness of events where a call to maternity triage would be advisable for health of both the mother and baby enabling health professionals to intervene at the earliest possible stage. ”

    Source location

    Elliott James Harratt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Highlight the importance of giving RhD-positive mothers appropriate guidance, written information and advice on when to contact services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will use this event as an opportunity to highlight the importance of ensuring that mothers who do have a D blood type, have the appropriate guidance, written information and understand when to contact services.”

    Source location

    Response from Greater Manchester Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2023

    Open published response
  3. Milton Keynes

    AI-generated summary

    David WOOD · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    David Wood had recently undergone open heart surgery and was suffering from depression and difficulty sleeping after discharge from hospital. On 22 June 2022, he was found suspended by the neck at his home. A review identified concerns about communication of possible delirium to his GP and wife, discharge planning, and the protocols for discharge following heart surgery.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide advice on when to seek further medical assistance

    Wider context from the report

    “Following the death of Mr. Wood a review was conducted by the trust and the review recognised that it would have been helpful if the symptoms of delirium had been highlighted to the GP and that it would have been useful if there had been a discussion with Mrs Wood to educate her as to the possibility of delirium, and to help plan his discharge from hospital and inform her when she should seek further medical assistance. The protocols for discharge following heart surgery should be reviewed in order to prevent similar deaths. ”

    Source location

    David WOOD · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide a full-time heart-centre discharge coordinator using a multidisciplinary approach for discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. If post-operative delirium occurs, considering involving an appropriate family member in discharge discussions (with the patient’s consent), to alert them as to what to expect in the process of recovery and when to seek further medical assistance after discharge.”

    Source location

    Response from Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 June 2023

    Open published response
  4. East London

    AI-generated summary

    Juliet Saunders · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Juliet Saunders, a 25-year-old woman with Cornelia De Lange Syndrome and a profound learning disability, attended hospital on 7 March 2020 with abdominal pain and vomiting and died at home the following day. The report identified concerns including misinterpretation of abdominal x-rays, failure to diagnose intestinal obstruction, inadequate escalation and supervision, departures from transfer and discharge procedures, lack of safety-netting advice, and insufficient support for patients with learning disabilities at weekends.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Absence of safety-netting advice for patients leaving the hospital

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The absence of safety-netting advice to patients leaving the hospital. ”

    Source location

    Juliet Saunders · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch a patient-designed discharge safety-netting leaflet after final approval and printing.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A discharge leaflet has been designed in partnership with patients which provides information on discharge. This will be launched shortly once the final approval has been signed off and the leaflet has returned from the printers. In addition to the leaflet, the Emergency Department are trialling a Discharge Helpline this is planning to launch from Monday 12th July and will provide a number to call if they have any queries after discharge. There is a draft SOP for the 2 month pilot period.”

    Source location

    2021-0157-Response-from-Queens-Hospital_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Launch and weekly-audit a two-month Emergency Department discharge helpline pilot.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A discharge leaflet has been designed in partnership with patients which provides information on discharge. This will be launched shortly once the final approval has been signed off and the leaflet has returned from the printers. In addition to the leaflet, the Emergency Department are trialling a Discharge Helpline this is planning to launch from Monday 12th July and will provide a number to call if they have any queries after discharge. There is a draft SOP for the 2 month pilot period.”

    Source location

    2021-0157-Response-from-Queens-Hospital_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 18 May 2021

    Open published response
  5. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Elsie Yvonne Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Elsie Yvonne Taylor, aged 68, fell at home on 15 September 2020, sustained rib fractures and a pneumothorax, and died later the same day after deteriorating in hospital. Concerns included incomplete recording of her reported decision to decline hospital admission and the advice given, lack of information about the consultation and deterioration symptoms, and no attempt to contact her GP or family despite her living alone.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide information about symptoms indicating deterioration

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) There was no information left by the attending paramedic crew to reflect the decision of the deceased to decline admission or the advice given by paramedics. The family of the deceased were not present during the consultation and as a consequence they did not know what symptoms to look out for which might suggestion a deterioration in the condition of the deceased; ”

    Source location

    Elsie Yvonne Taylor · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    A discharge sheet provided safety-netting information, so it was not correct that no relevant information or consultation outcome was left.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Response A discharge sheet was left with the patient, which detailed that the patient was to contact the GP or in the case of an emergency to call 999/111. The paramedic has confirmed that there was no family present but there was neighbour in attendance throughout the whole consultation. The neighbour was shown the bruise on the patient ribs and she informed the crew that she would stay with the patient for some time to keep an eye on her.”

    Source location

    2020-0281-Response-from-West-Midlands-Ambulance-Service-REDACTED
    Page 2 · response
    Published 6 January 2021

    Open published response
  6. North East Kent

    AI-generated summary

    Martin Thomas BARRETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Martin Thomas Barrett took part in a telephone assessment for anxiety on the morning of his death and disclosed suicidal thoughts and planning. A same-day referral for further psychiatric assessment was declined, and this decision was not communicated to him; he was later found hanging at home. The principal concern was that higher-risk patients may not be directly informed when an internal referral is declined, potentially leaving them without timely alternative treatment or safety-netting advice.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to directly inform higher-risk patients when internal referrals are declined, including providing interim safety-netting advice

    Wider context from the report

    “During oral evidence, I was advised that when an onwards internal referral is made to another clinician within the Priory Group which is then declined this is not communicated directly to the patient if the treatment is funded by way of insurance cover. In those cases a notification would be provided to the insurers or the policyholder and then the Priory Group would not have any further contact with the patient. As such, patients that are considered to be higher risk by the clinician at initial assessment may not therefore have the opportunity to imminently consider alternative sources of treatment or receive any advice as to safety netting in the interim as this information is not being provided by clinicians to the patient. From the evidence that I heard it would be reliant on their insurers or corporate policy holders (who may well not be clinicians) to make contact with the patients to inform them of this during which time their health may have further declined or their risk increased. ”

    Source location

    Martin Thomas BARRETT · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide therapists with guidance on advising newly referred higher-risk clients, including the timing limitations of consultant psychiatrist assessments.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Therapists have also been given guidance – similar to that outlined above – on the advice that they should give to any newly referred clients who they feel are higher risk. They have also been reminded that it is not always possible for an assessment by a consultant psychiatrist to take place on the same day as the initial therapy assessment and this needs to be taken into account when providing advice and guidance to a higher risk client.”

    Source location

    2020-0222-Response-from-Priory-Group-REDACTED.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require CCT staff and therapists to document interventions and communicate promptly with each other and newly referred clients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CCT and the therapists have been reminded that they should document their interventions and must communicate with each other and the newly referred client promptly – they should not expect this to be the responsibility of the insurer or corporate policyholder. Audits of client contacts will be carried out by the CCT from time to time in order to ensure this aim is achieved.”

    Source location

    2020-0222-Response-from-Priory-Group-REDACTED.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Carry out periodic CCT audits of client contacts to check that documentation and communication requirements are achieved.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The CCT and the therapists have been reminded that they should document their interventions and must communicate with each other and the newly referred client promptly – they should not expect this to be the responsibility of the insurer or corporate policyholder. Audits of client contacts will be carried out by the CCT from time to time in order to ensure this aim is achieved.”

    Source location

    2020-0222-Response-from-Priory-Group-REDACTED.pdf
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 December 2020

    Open published response
  7. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Gladys Margaret Borgogno · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gladys Margaret Borgogno underwent an ERCP procedure for bile duct stones on 24 April 2018 and was discharged after four hours of observation despite vomiting bile. She was found lifeless the following morning and was confirmed dead on 25 April 2018; concerns related to the length of post-procedure observation after vomiting and the clarity of written advice and documentation about seeking further medical attention.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate pre- and post-procedure written documentation of advice to seek further medical attention after vomiting

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The pre and post procedure written documentation in respect of the advice to seek further medical attention if vomiting developed post procedure upon discharge from hospital. In evidence at inquest, the treating Consultant Pancreatico-biliary Surgeon advised that he understood the family’s confusion surrounding the symptom of vomiting given the fact that Mrs Borgogno had vomited after the procedure but had been discharged from hospital. He advised that he would recommend that the hospital review its pre and post procedure ERCP documentation provided to patients. ”

    Source location

    Gladys Margaret Borgogno · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Strengthen post-ERCP discharge information to emphasise returning to hospital if vomiting or other symptoms develop at home, subject to governance ratification.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The Trust has strengthened the information given to patients on discharge following ERCP. I have attached the draft document for you with the amended information in red. This is currently being ratified through the Trust’s governance processes but it now highlights the importance of returning to hospital if vomiting, and other symptoms, start at home. This is to cover those uncommon situations where symptoms develop post 4 hours following the ERCP procedure.”

    Source location

    2019-0286-Response-by-University-Hospitals-of-North-Midlands
    Page 2 · response
    Published 18 October 2019

    Open published response
  8. London (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Sophie Holman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sophie Holman, a 10-year-old girl with chronic asthma, died on 13 December 2017 after collapsing during a severe asthma attack while being taken to hospital. The report identifies concerns about inadequate long-term management, fragmented records, failure to recognise the cumulative severity and risks of her asthma, lack of a coordinated asthma action plan and safety-netting, and missed opportunities for specialist referral.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate asthma safety-netting advice and reliance on unlicensed high-dose salbutamol weaning plans

    Wider context from the report

    “In the primary care practice there was: a) No clear agreed practice protocol for managing asthma b) The medical records did not contain an up to date summary of current and past problems; in particular correspondence from hospitals following treatment for asthma attacks was not Read Coded. As a result clinicians consulted could not readily see the evidence of this girls chronic poorly controlled asthma c) A failure to recognise the risks of future poor outcome such as: i. Excess salbutamol prescriptions after the publication of the NRAD in May 2014. The child was prescribed 28, 22, 30 and 16 of these inhalers in 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 by her general practice ii. Failure to recognise the only 5 of the required preventer inhalers were collected in Sophie’s final year of life d) No clear supervision of junior doctors and nurses delegated to provide asthma care e) Failure to objectively assess severity and progress when treating acute asthma attacks as per the UK BTS/SIGN asthma guidelines f) Failure to recognise that absence of symptoms and distress does not exclude the presence of a severe attack, as highlighted in the UK BTS/SIGN asthma guidelines g) Failure to follow up after attacks as detailed in the NICE Quality Statement of 25, 2013 h) No clear evidence of detailed specific safety netting advice and over-reliance on prescription of unlicensed, non-specific based high dose salbutamol ‘weaning plans’ which may have masked recognition of deteriorating signs due to a requirement for excess reliever medication in Sophie’s final fatal attack – which may have led the parents to seek help earlier than 24 hours after leaving the surgery i) Potentially dangerous advice on occasions: in particular when a nurse sent the child home and advised mother to administer reliever treatment with a nebuliser at home for an asthma attack j) No evidence of provision of a written Personalised Asthma Action Plan for recognition of uncontrolled asthma and attacks and any action to be taken by the family and how and when to obtain medical assistance k) There was only one example where one of the 16 general practitioners who treated this child arranged a post-attack follow-up review soon after attacks l) No attempt to increase the medication dose for three and a half years despite at least 14 recurring asthma attacks ”

    Source location

    Sophie Holman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    Karl Qolf Jamil Englemak Cassimjee · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Karl Qolf Jamil Englemak Cassimjee, who had a history of presumed paranoid schizophrenia and psychosis, was found dead on 5 February 2018 after becoming missing and being last seen behaving irrationally and bizarrely. The medical cause of death was hypothermia, and the inquest concluded accidental death. Concerns included an inadequate Mental Health Act assessment, insufficient risk assessment and safety planning, failures to obtain relevant collateral information, and mental health operational systems identified for revision not having been implemented.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to record interim deterioration advice and action information

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Brief circumstances of matter of concern a. A Mental Health Act assessment had been completed without a collateral history being obtained (including Clatterbridge Hospital); b. The assessment completed by the Specialist Registrar was entered on the form ‘Amongst systems’ in the incorrect format with no South Practitioner; c. The assessment, as recorded by the Registrar was accepted to be sub-optimal; d. The risk assessment has no clear formulation of risk and no evidence of collaborative safety planning with the deceased (that is to say, clear evidence that the advice was to means to take in the event of a deterioration in his condition from discharge to being seen by the Mental Health Home Treatment Team. e. It is unclear from patient records as to what information the deceased and/or the British Transport Police (who were tasked with the responsibility of considering the feedback to the response about contact with the MHTT or what action to be taken in the event of a deterioration in the interim). f. A Mental Health Nurse recorded a substantial and detailed history given to her by the deceased setting out the full extent of his florid delusions and paranoid thoughts that to have been fully and adequately properly evaluated by the Specialty Registrar, to the extent that the nurse expressed extreme surprise that the Registrar had not shown the required concern, and Mental Health Act detention where being no means within the operational procedures in place for the nurses concerns to be taken into account. ”

    Source location

    Karl Qolf Jamil Englemak Cassimjee · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. London (East)

    AI-generated summary

    William George BARTRAM · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Bartram was born with a chordee and hydrocele and was reported to have an inadequate urine stream from shortly after birth. Raised creatinine results and concerns about his urine output were not acted upon, and he died from septic shock on 12 March 2017 after deteriorating in hospital. The principal concerns were unclear processes for repeat blood samples, failure to highlight or act on abnormal results, and inadequate advice to his parents about what constituted a healthy urine stream.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of clear discharge advice to parents about a healthy urine stream in babies

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Mr and ████████ did not receive clear advice as to what to look out for, in terms of a healthy urine stream. Advice to parents on the discharge of babies from hospital, would be helpful. Mr and ████████ accepted reassurance from staff, as they were unclear as to what was “normal”. ”

    Source location

    William George BARTRAM · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026