Recurring concern

Failure to communicate safety-critical care information effectively between care providers and families

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 7 Jan 2014•Latest report 1 Jun 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures in provider-to-family or family-to-provider communication where the information concerns patient safety, clinical risks, care plans, deterioration, leave arrangements, incidents, complaints or other matters directly relevant to safe care.

Not included

  • Excludes communication failures solely between professionals, services or departments when families are not a relevant party.
  • Excludes generic failures of documentation, staffing, training or policy compliance unless they directly constitute or prevent communication of safety-critical information to or from families.
  • Excludes routine information provision or dissatisfaction that is not tied to a meaningful public-safety concern.
  • Excludes communication with patients, students, prisoners or other beneficiaries where families are not materially involved.
Reports
70

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
74

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
94

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care12
NHS England8
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust4
Care Quality Commission3
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3
Association of Ambulance Chief Executives2
Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust2
Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust2
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust2
Recipient name withheld2
Somerset NHS Foundation Trust2
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust2
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust2
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust2
the Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust2

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. North Wales (East and Central)

    AI-generated summary

    Anthony Gwyn Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    On 9 February 2014, Anthony Gwyn Williams, whose mental health was declining, went to Pentwmpath Woods and took his own life with a ligature while his balance of mind was disturbed. Concerns included insufficient guidance on when staff could deviate from the recognised psychiatric assessment pathway, lack of continuous access to patients’ medical records, and the need for greater engagement with families and carers about care and treatment plans.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient engagement with family and carers about patients' Care and Treatment Plans

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There should be greater engagement with family and carers of patients (with patient consent) to ensure that they are aware of the contents of patient's Care and Treatment Plan especially with regard to the options which may exist in times of crisis. ”

    Source location

    Anthony Gwyn Williams · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Family and carer involvement in care planning is legally limited where patients with capacity do not consent, unless overriding public interest justifies disclosure.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “general principal if a patient has capacity to make decisions about whether family members or carers are involved in a patient’s care planning and care, then services are obliged to respect that decision unless there is an overriding public interest, which merits disclosure of information. Where the involvement of family and carer’s is accepted by the patient, the sharing of the Care and Treatment Plan would be appropriate. I am assured that all patients are provided with a copy of their Care and Treatment Plans. If a patient lacks capacity to make decisions about the involvement of family or carers there should follow a best interest decision. I would suspect in the majority of cases the involvement of family and carers would be in a person’s best interest.”

    Source location

    2014-0523-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 2 December 2014

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Fenton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Fenton was admitted to Tameside Hospital on 26 April 2014 needing an urgent heart pacemaker and died on 30 April 2014 after delays and missed opportunities. Concerns included limited cardiology cover and facilities, shortages of Isoprenaline, failures relating to capacity and consent, delays in inserting pacing wires, inadequate facilities to manage complications, and poor communication.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of communication between staff, patients and families

    Wider context from the report

    “10. There was very poor communication between staff and other staff, and between staff and the family of the deceased and the patient herself (e.g. in relation to DNAR notice, “consent” forms etc.) (Tameside Hospital). ”

    Source location

    Mary Fenton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create and provide a bedside patient-safety booklet for patients and relatives.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust is striving to improve communication between clinicians, patients and family members. The Trust has created a bedside booklet, available for patients and relatives – “Patient Safety – Keeping you safe during your stay in hospital”. This empowers patients and their families to ask questions.”

    Source location

    2014-0443-Response-by-Tameside-Hospital
    Page 4 · response
    Published 13 October 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and update the DNACPR policy to require discussion, clear communication and checking of understanding.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In May 2014 the DNACPR policy was reviewed in line with R (on the application of David Tracey) v Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2014] to involve discussion with patients/their families. A DVD was created and is available on the Trust's intranet. The review of the policy was promoted through screensavers, to inform staff of the new policy.”

    Source location

    2014-0443-Response-by-Tameside-Hospital
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 October 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Roll out refresher training on mental-capacity, consent and communication policies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As to the actions of the particular staff involved in the care of Mrs Fenton, and with particular reference to the assessment and documentation of mental capacity, consent and communication, we have reminded the clinicians of the relevant policies and advised them that we will be rolling out refresher training. All Cardiology staff have also been informed by the Lead Consultant Cardiologist that no usage of Isoprenaline should be permitted in the CCU / Ward 31 without the consent of a Consultant Cardiologist / the on-call Cardiologist for pacing out of hours.”

    Source location

    2014-0443-Response-by-Tameside-Hospital
    Page 5 · response
    Published 13 October 2014

    Open published response
  3. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Mark Darren Bartholomew · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mark Darren Bartholomew, who had a longstanding diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia and was detained in hospital after transfer from prison, died by hanging on 25 July 2013 during a routine observation check. Concerns included an inadequate response to emergency services, the absence of the ligature cutter needed to release him promptly, and insufficient detail in observation records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of communication in coordinating family notification of death

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Notwithstanding the Trust’s policy entitled ’2999 Procedure’ the purpose of which is to advise staff of process during a psychiatric emergency, it was clear that the response to external emergency services was inadequate. More particularly:- • The informant was unable to provide the emergency controller with either the name or age of the patient; whether he was still breathing; and whether a defibrillator was available. • Essential documentation (the observation record for the relevant 24 hour period) was mislaid and not available for the Inquest. • Originally, a joint visit by both Police and Trust staff was arranged for the purpose of relaying news of the deceased’s death to the family. By reason of a lack of communication, the family were notified following an attendance by uniformed officers whereupon the deceased’s Mother telephoned the Trust. ”

    Source location

    Mark Darren Bartholomew · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Inner West London

    AI-generated summary

    Keiran Michael John Toman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Keiran Michael John Toman had fixed delusions, withdrew from social and psychiatric support, and subsequently starved himself to death due to paranoia before being found deceased in a hotel. The report raised concerns that psychiatric services did not maintain contact with his family despite his lack of insight and capacity, potentially leaving him isolated and increasing the risk of deterioration and death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient review of patient decisions about permission to contact next of kin or family

    Wider context from the report

    “(5) That permission to contact next of kin/ family decisions taken by patients may not be reviewed often enough by those providing psychiatric care, such that information in relation to changes in treatment, mental state, discharge, provider of care etc may not be being appropriately communicated to the detriment of patients. ”

    Source location

    Keiran Michael John Toman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  5. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Miss Abiola Dosunmu · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Abiola Dosunmu developed abnormal blood tests, proteinuria and symptoms that were treated as cellulitis, before rapidly deteriorating and being found dead at home on 24 August 2012. The report identified concerns about failures to communicate the proteinuria and abnormal results, inadequate follow-up and monitoring, and a missed opportunity to diagnose and treat SLE earlier.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate the significance of persistently raised ESR and CK to the patient and family

    Wider context from the report

    “(2) The Trust failed to communicate the significance of the persistently raised ESR and CK to the patient and family. ”

    Source location

    Miss Abiola Dosunmu · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Trust states that it communicated the illness’s significance and appropriately warned the patient and her mother about self-discharge risks.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The medical records (in particular the clinical noted dated 09.03.12 at 13.25 hours) suggest that the Trust communicated the significance of Abiola’s illness as it was understood at the time and did its best to dissuade her from leaving hospital. The Trust is satisfied that it acted appropriately by warning Abiola and her mother of the serious consequences of self-discharging. Nonetheless, with immediate effect consultants will be notified within 12 hours that their patient has discharged themselves from hospital to minimise the potential risk to the patient or others (see also paragraph 5 below).”

    Source location

    2014-0209-Response-by-Kings-College-Hospital
    Page 1 · response
    Published 5 May 2014

    Open published response
  6. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Phyllis Barnes · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Phyllis Barnes underwent elective laparoscopic anterior resection and was discharged home, but developed persistent vomiting and became increasingly unwell. She was later readmitted with an anastomotic leak and died from complications. Concerns included delayed recognition of the seriousness of her symptoms, a superficial nurse-led telephone consultation with uncertain follow-up, and a lack of formal communication with her daughter.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of formal communication opportunities for patients’ relatives to report patients’ conditions to primary care clinicians

    Wider context from the report

    “3. There was no formal communication or opportunity for Mrs Barnes’s daughter to relate her mother’s condition to the GP or the Nurse Practitioner ”

    Source location

    Phyllis Barnes · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Natasha Raghoo · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Natasha Raghoo was admitted to The Dene Hospital in April 2012 for treatment related to bipolar disorder and was later detained under section 2 of the Mental Health Act. She was found unresponsive in bed on 5 May 2012 and died from anaphylactic shock caused by an unknown allergen. Concerns included inconsistent physical observations, lack of ECG assessment, staff training in resuscitation and defibrillator use, and communication and handover problems.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Haphazard communication between staff and family

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Communications between staff and family were haphazard the policy of involving family in care planning was not clear. ”

    Source location

    Natasha Raghoo · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review family and carer communication and discuss communication issues at multidisciplinary meetings to support consultation when patients consent.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Lessons Learned and changes made”

    Source location

    2014-0100-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 March 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Short admissions and patient confidentiality constrained significant liaison and family input, although involvement was attempted where possible.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The service is an acute service that provides overspill for South London & Maudsley (“SLAM”) patients and patients from other Trusts. Many of these patients only stay in the service for a matter of days. The very short periods of time spent by the majority of patients does not allow for significant liaison and input from families and carers. However, the service does attempt to involve families and carers wherever possible and within the constraints of patient confidentiality.”

    Source location

    2014-0100-Response-by-Partnership-in-Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 6 March 2014

    Open published response
  8. West Sussex

    AI-generated summary

    Ryan Chapman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ryan Chapman was admitted to a mental health ward and, while being accompanied to an activity, left the hospital and ran into the path of an articulated lorry. He died from his injuries on 22 May 2013. Concerns included staff misunderstanding and inconsistent application of the Trust’s leave policy, uncertainty about the role of peer support workers as escorts, delays in completing his risk assessment and care plan, limited information for his family, and inconsistent ward visitor security.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide families with copies of patients’ care plans

    Wider context from the report

    “5. There was lack of written information provided to families by the Hospital on admission to the patient. In addition the family were not provided with a copy of the Ryan’s care plan. ”

    Source location

    Ryan Chapman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Staffordshire South

    AI-generated summary

    Pauline Meredith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Pauline Meredith, aged 42, was found dead in her flat on 30 August 2013. Her death was attributed to mixed drug toxicity, including a fatal level of morphine, excessive levels of tramadol and propranolol, and alcohol. Concerns included the amount and review of prescribed medication, the addition of morphine alongside existing medication and alcohol dependence, the response to family concerns, the absence of team meetings, and delays in involving community mental health services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to listen to family concerns about changed patient behaviour

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) The family’s perceived reluctance by the GP to listen to the concerns expressed by them with regards to the changed behaviour of the patient following the addition of morphine. ”

    Source location

    Pauline Meredith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop structured criteria and a protocol for identifying complex patients who would benefit from discussion at clinical meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2) The practice will endeavour in the future to identify complex patients who might benefit from discussion at clinical meetings. The practice is currently considering how to select patients for these”

    Source location

    2014-0011-Response-by-Browning-Street-Surgery
    Page 8 · response
    Published 10 January 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The paranoid thoughts were considered unrelated to morphine and more likely associated with stress and previous similar episodes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regard to ████████ concern about the paranoia being related to the morphine, I did not consider this to be likely. Miss Meredith’s thoughts seem to be a localised paranoia as otherwise her mental state seemed appropriate, according to the information that I had from Miss Meredith and her family. My impression was that it would be very unusual for Morphine to trigger paranoia and her paranoid thoughts were more likely to be a response to stressful situations. Morphine is not usually associated with paranoia or delusions, although can be associated with hallucinations, confusion and agitation. I additionally considered that Miss Meredith’s paranoid thoughts were similar to her previous episodes when she reported paranoid feelings between 2003 and 2006. At that time she had thought that she was being followed by special branch or inspectors from the benefits agency.”

    Source location

    2014-0011-Response-by-Browning-Street-Surgery
    Page 5 · response
    Published 10 January 2014

    Open published response
  10. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    James Hadfield Withers · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    James Hadfield Withers died on 27 January 2013 after surgery for invasive colonic adenocarcinoma, with the inquest recording congestive cardiac failure associated with diseased heart and the stress of the operation. Concerns included a five-day delay in cardiology review, missing medical and nursing notes, incorrect recording of DNAR status, and poor communication among staff and with the family.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to involve or update the family about DNAR decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The patient’s DNAR status was fixed without any reference to/discussion with his family. Whilst it is appreciated that this decision is for the doctor alone, good practice would require that the family be kept up to date with all such decisions ”

    Source location

    James Hadfield Withers · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Poor communication between clinical staff and with the patient’s family

    Wider context from the report

    “5. There was generally poor communication between nursing and medical staff (inter se) and between medical/nursing staff and the family of the patient. ”

    Source location

    James Hadfield Withers · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026