Recurring concern

Failure to provide indicated psychological interventions in mental health care

First to latest report 22 Apr 2014 — 6 Mar 2025

Reports that mention this concern
19
Times this concern has been raised
20
Stated actions linked to this concern
22

What this concern includes

Includes failures of dedicated psychological or psychosocial intervention provision in mental health care, including absent or inconsistent availability, insufficient clinical psychology capacity and failure to offer interventions when clinically indicated.

What is not included
  • Excludes generic mental-health treatment, staffing or service-capacity deficiencies where psychological or psychosocial intervention provision is not specifically identified.
  • Excludes failures limited to diagnosis, assessment, medication, care planning or risk management unless they directly concern access to or provision of a psychological or psychosocial intervention.
  • Excludes educational, pastoral or general social support that is not a dedicated psychological or psychosocial intervention.
  • Excludes the underlying mental-health condition, self-harm risk or other outcome without an identified failure in psychological-intervention provision.

Reports and published responses 19 reports

See individual reports that have raised this concern, and the actions taken in response

  1. West Yorkshire Eastern

    AI-generated summary

    Scott Patrick Carton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Scott Patrick Carton was released from prison on 5 January 2017 to the Westgate Project Hostel in Wakefield and was found dead there on 10 January 2017. His death involved the synergistic combination of prescribed methadone, pregabalin and tramadol. Concerns included the suitability of his hostel placement, the lack of anticipated psychological support and a clear management plan, and wider gaps in support for prisoners with mental health and drug dependence issues before and after release.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of appropriate psychological interventions in prison

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Having been diagnosed with an emotionally unstable personality disorder in 2013 Mr Carton needed to be allocated to a prison establishment which did provide appropriate psychological interventions. In the event he was placed in HMP Wealstun which did not provide such services. This diminished any prospect of him succeeding in the community when released. ”

    Source location

    Scott Patrick Carton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient psychological resource for prisoners released on licence

    Wider context from the report

    “5. Evidence taken at the inquest emphasised the paucity of psychological resource available to prisoners released on licence with emotionally unstable personality disorder and drug dependence issues. In consequence, individuals such as Mr Carton are released into the community when they are ill prepared. Unless adequate resources are available the result is likely to be that individuals will consume police and hospital resources as their condition deteriorates to the point where they are recalled to prison or their life ends in tragedy. ”

    Source location

    Scott Patrick Carton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    John Paul Derwent · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Paul Derwent was referred for cognitive behavioural therapy while the waiting time was 12 months against a six-week target. He expressed suicidal ideation, was admitted and later discharged into the community; on 13 November 2017 he was found suspended from a ligature at home. The report raised concerns about insufficient CBT capacity, the substantial waiting list and escalation mechanisms that did not allow early action.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient capacity for people referred for CBT

    Wider context from the report

    “The Inquest heard that the target time for an appointment for CBT should be 6 weeks. At the time Mr Derwent was referred, the waiting time was 12 months. There was a waiting list review in October 2017 when it was established that 500 people were on the waiting list for CBT. The waiting list time at the date of the Inquest remained 12 months. The Inquest heard that there was insufficient capacity for the number of people referred for CBT which is why the waiting list had become so significant. It was unclear why the list had been allowed to increase to this level. The mechanisms for escalation between the commissioning body and the service provider did not appear to allow for early action to address the issue. ”

    Source location

    John Paul Derwent · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

  3. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    John Haines · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    John Haines was admitted to a mental health ward in March 2017 after his anxiety and depression deteriorated, and was discharged on 14 June 2017 with planned follow-up. He was found deceased at home on 17 June 2017 after failing to respond to contact. The report raised concerns about in-patients and Home Treatment Team patients being unable to access qualified psychological therapy, including delays in accessing Healthy Minds.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of access to qualified psychological therapy for mental health in-patients

    Wider context from the report

    “1. During the course of the evidence it became apparent that mental health in-patients still do not have access to therapy from a qualified Psychologist, despite the fact that this has been raised in previous Regulation 28 PFD Forms. Notably, all clinicians were of the professional view that psychological therapy was critical to treatment, alongside psychiatric care. ”

    Source location

    John Haines · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Recruit qualified psychologists to deliver therapy on inpatient wards in Bury.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Bury has some Psychological therapy provision on the inpatient wards and HMR have recruited a qualified Psychologists to deliver therapy in the inpatient setting.”

    Source location

    2017-0402-Response-by-Heywood-Middleton-and-Rochdale-CCG
    Page 1 · response
    Published 15 February 2018

    Open published response

  4. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Linsay Bushell · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Linsay Bushell, aged 37, died on 13 October 2014 after being found having self-ligatured under her bed while detained in a psychiatric ward; the medical cause was asphyxia due to compression of the neck due to ligature strangulation. The report identified concerns including inadequate access to psychological therapies, limited understanding and documentation of self-harm, poor handover and observation records, fragmented care, delays in finding suitable placement, and insufficient staff training and support.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide psychologically driven care and consistently available psychology interventions

    Wider context from the report

    “The Court heard evidence that 40% to 50% of mentally disordered female patients suffered from EUPD rather than mental illness and yet there was no provision or priority for therapeutic psychological services to be commissioned in the NHS England Area. The Jury found: Para 3 1. Linsay Bushell was certified as having died on the evening of 13th October, 2014. at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital. 2. Linsay Bushell came by the fatal event that caused her death at 20.20 at room 2 on the Brunswick Ward at the Broad Oak Unit on 13th October 2014. 3. The medical cause of Linsay's death was Asphyxia due to Compression of the Neck due to Ligature Strangulation. 4. Linsay put herself in the position in which she was found however her intention was unclear. 5. At the time of her death and for most of her adult life, Linsay had suffered from a form of mental disorder namely an unstable borderline personality disorder. 6. The real and imminent risk of self-harm or suicide was recognised during Linsay's care at the Broad Oak Unit in the time leading up to her death. 7. The risk was managed adequately and effectively during Linsay's period as an in-patient. 8. The jury accept the admissions of Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust and adopt the findings that the Trust has made. a. In the Trust Position Statement Mersey Care considers the death of any service user with the utmost seriousness and care. As an organisation it is committed to providing a high standard of care to service users generally. If, in connection with any patient under its care, mistakes have been made whether in the form of individual errors or as a result of system or structural defects, then the Mersey Care Trust Board is committed to uncovering those errors, correcting them and learning lessons from them. 2. Following the death of Linsay Bushell on 13th October 2014, Mersey Care instigated an investigation into her death, including the wider circumstances of her death, to find out whether there were shortcomings in the care provided to Linsay and, if so, devise ways of improving practice. That investigation was an internal review and root cause analysis by a multi-disciplinary panel which included an external medical reviewer. Its Terms of Reference were agreed by the Trust Board and were deliberately wide so as to pick up deficits in care or indeed examples of good practice throughout Linsay's involvement with the Trust and so enable as deep a learning exercise as possible in what was acknowledged to be a complex clinical picture. The review panel considered relevant documents and interviewed members of staff and the investigator's report was provided to Mersey Care Trust Board in December 2015. 3. Following the internal investigation, the Trust Board instructed ████████ the Chief Operating Officer of the Local Services Division to consider the report of the internal investigation and undertake her own review and appraisal of the circumstances of the death. She was also instructed to devise a workable and practical strategy to address the issues which were raised by the internal review and her own consideration of the material. 4. The Trust is committed to transparency and accountability. The purpose of this Position Statement is to advise the Court and Linsay's family of the Trust's response to the work which has been undertaken internally by the Trust and of the approach which will be taken to the forthcoming inquest into Linsay's death. It is hoped that, by doing so, the Court's case management task in respect of the forthcoming inquest will be facilitated; also importantly that Linsay's family will be reassured by their understanding that an approach which is consistent with the conclusions of the internal review of the death is to be adopted at the inquest. 5. The conclusions of the internal review include some examples of good or notable practice and many areas where the service or care provided to Linsay fell short of the desired standards. Following concerns raised by a member of staff, the Review Team considered the contents, including the conclusions, of the internal review undertaken. Having done so, the Review Team adheres to the conclusions which were expressed in the report. The Trust Board fully acknowledges that mistakes had been made in Linsay's care when she was a resident on Broad Oak Unit and that these mistakes afforded Linsay the opportunity to ligature on 13th October 2014. The Trust accepts responsibility for Linsay's death. Whilst understanding that no apology will fully assuage the feelings of Linsay's family and those who were close to her, the Trust nonetheless offers that apology. It is made with sincerity. 6. The review panel considered that Linsay's psychiatric condition was complex. Her condition fluctuated in response to stressors such as bereavement and illicit drug use. However, a main theme to emerge from the internal review panel report was the failure of the Trust to provide Linsay with a service that was psychologically driven at all levels of care. The Trust accepts this criticism. It is accepted that psychology interventions were not available on a consistent basis throughout Linsay's residence on the Unit and that ward staff were inadequately supported in their provision of such care and treatment. a. Whilst an attempt to understand the motivation for self-harming behaviour is apparent from the Acute Care Plans (which were not available to the panel) the Trust accepts that this was inadequate. The Trust also accepts that the record keeping and standard of documentation was inadequate so that a more detailed picture of Linsay's self-harming behaviour and its triggers was not available. As a result, staff were hampered in considering the best ways of limiting and controlling Linsay's self-harming behaviour. b. Whilst understanding that patients suffering from Personality Disorders may present a complex management problem, a focused and co-ordinated approach to finding the most appropriate establishment to meet Linsay's needs was not adopted. It was recognised that Brunswick Ward did not meet Linsay's short or long-term needs. Although efforts were made by the Care Co-ordinator to locate the most appropriate placement for Linsay, funding was not immediately available. This had the effect of causing Linsay distress and disappointment. The Trust accepts this criticism. c. Staff were not sufficiently trained and supported in their understanding of Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorders and the high suicide rate associated with this condition particularly during long term hospital stays. Again, the Trust accepts this criticism. 7. Further themes to emerge from the internal review included: the lack of implementing a co-ordinated approach to checking patients after handover; that handover documentation was scant; that documentation of observation levels was insufficiently clear; that there were limited interventions regarding substance misuse and its effect on Linsay's self-harming behaviour and that ward management needed greater support. All of these observations and criticisms are accepted by the Trust. 8. ████████ has been tasked with reviewing Linsay's care during her residence on Brunswick Ward and reviewing the conclusions of the internal report. She is involved in the wider Trust initiatives which include reducing the risk of suicide by patients and enhancing the understanding and treatment of those patients who suffer from Personality Disorders. She has set out the steps which have been taken in her statement. The key points are as follows: a. Given the wide understanding that those suffering from Personality Disorders are best managed in the community, a Personality Disorder Hub has been established in the community. This is now led by ████████ a Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy, and is intended to co-ordinate and manage the care of patients with Personality Disorders within the community. The objective is that, where possible, admissions to hospital are kept short, or avoided altogether. This involves close and collaborative working by all of those involved in the patient's care. This is facilitated by the PD Hub. b. Case managers have been recruited and assigned to service users who attend the emergency services regularly (as a consequence of self-harming behaviour). These case managers work closely with the PD Hub and focus care on the individual. The care given is psychologically based. It is targeted at helping the patient to devise strategies to limit self-harming behaviour. c. Borderline Personality Disorder Guidelines have been devised which stipulate that meetings of professionals should take place in complex cases and a specific Extended Care Plan should anticipate and considers care both in the community and in inpatient units. The objective is to provide a coherent and co-ordinated plan of care which is tailored to the particular needs and challenges posed by the particular patient. d. Nursing staff have received training in Personality Disorders. Complex Case discussions take place on all wards. This is intended to enable multi-disciplinary team discussion between professionals in particularly challenging cases. e. A daily Bed Management system has been introduced which, amongst other objectives, is intended to ensure that patients with Personality Disorders are discharged back into the community with minimum delay and with an appropriate support package. 9. Although ████████ describes in her statement the various responses which have been made by the Trust to improve the management of patients with Personality Disorders, the individual elements are intended to work as only part of an integrated model. The strength of the structure lies in its overarching objective of transforming the approach generally to meeting the needs of those with Personality Disorders, recognised as presenting a particular set of challenges to any healthcare organisation. 10. ████████ also addressed in her statement the further steps which have been taken to support staff in complying with Trust policies, including the Care Programme Approach, observation levels, suicide prevention and training, record keeping and shift handover documentation. Regular audits for compliance and ongoing support is undertaken. There has been a review of leadership roles within the Unit generally including Brunswick Ward and support and guidance for those occupying a leadership role is regularly provided. 11. As ████████ has stated, although much has changed since Linsay's death, there is no room for complacency. She and others within the Trust will continue their work and undertake a regular evaluation of service levels. 12. It is hoped that Linsay's family are encouraged in their understanding that the Trust have taken Linsay's death very seriously indeed. Lessons have been learned. Her death has been a catalyst for change for the better. b. In the implementation of Lessons learnt the Trust further accepts 1. The review team identified this as "a very complex case" and noted that "it is unclear whether or not LB harmed herself with a view to achieving death or in an effort to gain help from staff which had happened on many occasions before during her in-patient stay". a. The review team reached a number of critical conclusions relating to the care which Linsay received during the course of her involvement with the Trust. The principal conclusions were as follows:- b. Limited understanding and analysis of self-harming behaviour. The review team noted that Linsay was described as undertaking self-harming behaviour on many occasions and that her 'ligaturing' was used in the notes in a generic sense with no specific details given on many occasions. The review team concluded that despite repeated attempts at self-harm with the same behaviour, insufficient effort was made to look at this particular risk. They also concluded that the notes did not pick up exploration of the reasons behind many self-harm attempts. Instead, they thought it was generally assumed that Linsay's self-harming behaviour was as a result of either drugs or some form of stress or 'loss' and that a more detailed exploration of her episodes of self-harm might have proved useful in terms of developing preventative strategies. Linsay did not have a "safety plan" as this was not Trust policy at the time. However, she did have a Care Plan. c. Failure to implement a co-ordinated approach towards checking the safety of patients following handover. Staff told the reviewers there was no co-ordinated approach to allocating tasks on the night in question. On that night there was no formal "walk around" undertaken by a qualified member of staff as required by policy. The review team concluded that it was essential that generic safety systems such as the handover check are implemented very robustly as they are the alternative to individual observations being used which in this case were thought to have a negative effect on Linsay. d. Poor quality of handover information. The handover notes were frequently scant in content. There was no standard template as to what should be included in handover. The review team was unclear how the nursing handover was quality controlled. On just one occasion it was mentioned in handover that Linsay had ligatured during the day but despite the frequency of this behaviour the handover notes did not capture this at all. e. Confusion about observation levels. There were occasions when it was unclear what level of observation Linsay was on. On the day of the incident staff told the reviewers they were informed that Linsay had been on leave with a member of staff and that it had gone very well, that she was settled and had just had a take-away meal. There was no discussion as regards any risk that Linsay may have been at, taking into account previous behaviour after leave. Recording of changes in observation levels were frequently unclear. f. No process to monitor the completion of CPA documentation. The review team could not identify the processes that were in place to ensure that all patients had an up to date risk management plan and care plan hence they found that the plans in place for Linsay were not current although Linsay did in fact have a current care plan. g. Limited content and poor quality of documentation. Documentation of observation levels was not as clear as it should have been and given her very high risk it was important to document any observation changes and the reasoning behind this. This might help build up a picture of the best way of mitigating any potential risk from any form of self-harm, particularly with that associated with ligaturing. It would also help staff adopt a more 'psychological' approach to care rather than using physical intervention like high observation levels or PRN medication if 'agitated', the latter of which was similar in a way to her 'substance misuse. The review team noted that staff did spend a lot of time talking to Linsay but the notes did not capture any questioning as to why she had tried to self-harm at a particular time. h. Limited interventions regarding substance misuse as an inpatient. Linsay's highest risk of suicide seemed to be in the aftermath of substance misuse. Whilst this was commented on, specialist measures to try and mitigate it were not put in place. The addiction case worker did not attend multi-disciplinary team meetings whilst on the ward, though they did see Linsay whilst she was an inpatient in Childwall Brook Nursing Home. The reviewers noted that the care appeared to be fragmented in that different parts of the services did not plan or deliver the care that was needed together. i. Poor coordination of referral to a specialist provider. The team pursued a variety of specialist placements in an attempt to meet Linsay's care needs going forwards. One of them, Cambrian Care, undertook an assessment and accepted Linsay as they felt that they had the ability to provide her with the appropriate care required. When the funding was requested it was rejected by the Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG). It was at this time that the funding of Out of Area Placements was being changed with the Trust being given the delegated responsibility for allocating resources on behalf of the CCG. Consequently Linsay's future needs were re-assessed and internal placements were considered in the Trust's own services. The review was completed a short time before Linsay's death, and recommended that an Out of Area specialist placement should be supported. The review team felt that the whole process of having Linsay assessed externally and then the process being stopped would have raised her expectations inappropriately. The significant delay in undertaking a review process was felt by the review team to have kept Linsay in an area that was recognised as not being able to meet all her short and long term needs. j. Ward Management. Brunswick ward was a very busy admission ward. The Ward Manager did not have a background in leading such a ward nor did the Modern Matron who came from a community background. This meant that senior challenge and specific clinical guidance for staff was not available. During interviews it was suggested that there had been some friction between nurse management on the ward that may have contributed to a background of poor team working. The review team advised that it was important staff were led by experienced managers who understand both the management processes and the clinical area they are responsible for. k. Transfer of Patients from one organisation to another. The review team identified and amongst staff that patients could not be transferred from one organisation to another until they were "stable". This was impracticable for cases like Linsay's as she was rarely, if ever, stable. She lived in an area inaccessible to her treating psychiatry service when she lived in Kensington whilst remaining under 5 Boroughs Partnership NHS Foundation Trust's care. The review team concluded that regular engagement with local Mersey Care services might have avoided Linsay's final admission. l. Lack of implementing a clear care pathway. Linsay had a diagnosis of Emotional Unstable Personality Disorder which is associated with a high suicide rate long-term. This is particularly increased during extended in-patient stays. Staff stated during interview that they had not had training related to self-harming behaviour or in the care of people with an Emotionally Unstable Personality Disorder. The reviewers could not identify a clear pathway that was being followed to care for Linsay which took into account her complex needs. Whilst staff appeared to have worked hard at building a relationship up with Linsay the review team concluded that it was generally at a superficial level. The review team noted that the Trust had a Borderline Personality Disorder strategy and guidance but could not find that it was implemented or understood by staff. The review team recognised the national view is that admissions for people with a Borderline Personality Disorder are often counterproductive to improving the mental state of a patient and at worst contribute to difficulties and worsening of the condition. How and when clinicians feel able to take managed and considered “positive” risks is important. How these issues are factored into an extended care plan and the support that clinicians can receive on these cases needs to be clear and thought through by the Trust. The review team are aware that this work was on going within the organisation. m. Lack of specialist psychological work/guidance to staff. The review team found that specialist interventions were not available on a consistent basis. The review team found that there was inconsistent availability of psychology on the ward environment during the last period of Linsay's admission. The review team were told that Linsay was not amenable to psychological interventions and had tried different modalities in the past. It was a concern that whilst Linsay may not have wanted or been able to avail herself of therapy the overall strategy of care should have been directed and guided from a more psycho-therapeutic perspective. 2. The review team could not identify one specific root cause but felt that the contributory factors interacted together to create a situation whereby Linsay remained distressed on the ward, with limited up take of psychological therapy to help reduce the distress seemingly enhanced by her recent losses. The staff clearly tried hard to work with her but with limited knowledge. There was a sense of fragmented care in that specialist services such as those offered by the addiction team were not engaged in the ward discussions despite Linsay engaging with them during her short stay at Childwall Brook Nursing Home. The period to identify a suitable placement for Linsay seemed overly protracted and seemed to focus thoughts on an external answer to the escalating situation. Discontinuity of Care/Management of Care 3. The Trust has done a lot of work looking at how to develop the service it offers to service users with a diagnosis of personality disorder. It has developed Guidelines for the management of these individuals and established a Personality Disorder Hub (PD Hub) headed by ████████ a Consultant Psychologist, in November 2014. These Guidelines are produced at pages 311 - 355 of the Inquest Bundle B. 4. The Trust's Borderline Personality Disorder Guidelines advise that in complex cases there should be a meeting of professionals followed by the development of a specific Extended Care Plan (ECP). The ECP starts with a formulation/summary of the history and care provided, and then describes the type of care that should be provided in different settings including inpatient units. 5. Evidence suggests that prolonged or repeated hospital admissions are not helpful for service users with a diagnosis of personality disorder. The PD Hub aims to keep admissions to hospital as short as possible and to avoid them altogether where appropriate. The Trust has recruited individual psychologists and nurses trained and qualified in managing patients with a personality disorder diagnosis to work as case managers for this group of service users. They are responsible for managing the care of the most complex service users regardless of where the service user goes and thus are able to provide continuity of care and work with other care teams to provide consistency of approach. 6. The team initially identified 40 service users who attended A&E on a regular basis and allocated these to the 4 case managers then in post so that each case manager was responsible for 10 service users. Given the success of this work more case managers have been recruited so that the most complex service users who have increased need now have a specialist case manager. 7. The case managers are focussed care for the individual. The approach to care is psychologically based and will include the case manager working with the service user to look at their risk taking and what triggers it. They will then work with the service user to develop strategies to enable the service user to cope with these triggers. Triggers may include memories of past abuse. 8. The Trust is working towards extending the recently introduced day service available for people with personality disorder as part of our evidenced based PD pathway. 9. The aim is to help the service user to manage their condition differently and thus avoid hospital admission if possible. Risk Assessment/Care Planning 10. Linsay's mental state, level of distress, reported symptomology and self-harming or suicidal behaviour fluctuated quite markedly during her admission. I accept that there was an unstructured approach to reviewing and planning interventions with Linsay which meant there was no collaboratively developed understanding of her risk. 11. Staff are expected to reassess the risks following each ligature incident and episode of self-harm and document the fact that an assessment had taken place and the conclusions reached. Such reviews ought to have included a detailed exploration of Linsay's mental state, her thoughts and feelings and the level of observation she required. ”

    Source location

    Linsay Bushell · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NHS England is responsible for overseeing commissioning and delivering related improvements to mental health services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You issued your Report to NHS England, alongside the Secretary of State for Health, and I understand Professor Sir Bruce Keogh replied to you on 21 July.”

    Source location

    2017-0137-Response-by-Department-of-Health
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 September 2017

    Open published response

  5. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Philip Anthony Denning · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Philip Anthony Denning, who had a history of substance misuse and mental health problems, died from diamorphine intoxication on 23 July 2015 after using heroin. The report raised concerns about fragmented services, limited psychology provision, poor information-sharing between organisations, and a lack of clarity in primary care about accessing appropriate support for people with both substance misuse and mental health needs.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of CRI to provide or arrange additional psychological support for patients with co-occurring substance misuse and mental health problems

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Since the introduction of the CRI in October 2014, patients with both categories of problem, have, in the county, been managed by CRI. They are not equipped or commissioned to deal with the additional psychology needs of their patients. We were told that the only way that they can try to arrange this for their patients is via their GPs. It appears that, on the facts of this tragic case, even an employee of CRI itself may have mistaken their remit. ”

    Source location

    Philip Anthony Denning · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

  6. Manchester North

    AI-generated summary

    Guy Jeffrey Robinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Guy Jeffrey Robinson, a 31-year-old man with mental and physical health problems, left a mental health ward on leave on 10 July 2014 and did not return. He was found deceased outdoors on 15 July 2014; the inquest found the cause of death to be multiple drug toxicity and exposure. Concerns included delay and inadequate familiarity with the AWOL protocol, and a lack of direct inpatient access to Clinical Psychology services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of direct inpatient access to Clinical Psychology Service

    Wider context from the report

    “2. Clinical Psychology Service - the only access afforded to a Clinical Psychologist depends upon three pre-requisites being met - i) discharge ii) to a fixed abode iii) onward referral by the Community Mental Health Team. There is no inpatient Clinical Psychology facility and no ability for hospital clinicians to refer a patient directly. This is a significant service gap and potentially prejudices/puts at risk some of the most vulnerable people e.g. those who are of no fixed abode. ”

    Source location

    Guy Jeffrey Robinson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    In-patient Psychological Therapies are available through appropriate referrals, and a home address is not required during admission.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “- There is access to Psychological Therapies on the ward, which takes the form of consultation, assessment and formulation and supervision for staff who are providing psychologically informed support to patients.”

    Source location

    2015-0432-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 12 November 2015

    Open published response

  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Rowena Kathryn Golton · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Rowena Kathryn Golton had a history of recurring depression, suicidal thinking and deteriorating mental illness. On 6 April 2014, after being assessed as low risk of suicide and discharged from A&E with a plan for later crisis-team review, she jumped from a fire escape and died from multiple traumatic injuries. Concerns included limited access to psychologists within crisis teams and significant waiting times for psychological therapy.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of availability of psychological services within crisis teams

    Wider context from the report

    “- Evidence was given as to the lack of availability of psychological services within the crisis teams. Following her admission as an inpatient she was then under the care of the crisis team. Not all crisis teams have access to a psychologist and the internal admissions recognised that there needed to be a review of the availability of psychological services to ensure adequate provision and access. - In addition there was recognition that the waiting times for access to psychological therapy are significant and there is a greater need for the service to prioritise cases. ”

    Source location

    Rowena Kathryn Golton · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review psychological therapy service provision across services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have not, as yet, received any information from Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust in relation to the lack of availability of psychological therapies in crisis teams. ████████, Head of Mental Health Improvement Programme, is working closely with Trust colleagues to review service provision across all services and to develop care pathways for service users.”

    Source location

    2014-0486-Response-by-North-Central-South-Manchester-Clinical-Commissioning-Groups
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop care pathways for service users requiring psychological therapies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have not, as yet, received any information from Manchester Mental Health and Social Care Trust in relation to the lack of availability of psychological therapies in crisis teams. ████████, Head of Mental Health Improvement Programme, is working closely with Trust colleagues to review service provision across all services and to develop care pathways for service users.”

    Source location

    2014-0486-Response-by-North-Central-South-Manchester-Clinical-Commissioning-Groups
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Request information on psychological therapy provision across inpatient and community services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust have indicated areas of significant pressure and that complex cases service are exceeding the available commissioned resource’. Within the block contract in place there is no specific allocation for this service or any other Psychological Therapies, with the exception of IAPT, and so I am unsure what the Trust considers ‘the available commissioned resource’. We have received a request to ████████ (Director of Finance) at the Contracts Meeting with the Trust for information regarding the level of Psychological Therapy input into inpatient and community services to understand which services have input and which do not.”

    Source location

    2014-0486-Response-by-North-Central-South-Manchester-Clinical-Commissioning-Groups
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 November 2014

    Open published response

  8. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Roseanne Cooke · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Roseanne Cooke experienced a marked deterioration in her mental health, including suicidal thoughts, and was found having taken her own life at her mother’s home on 1 May 2014. The report identified concerns about unavailable inpatient psychological input, confusion and delays regarding psychological-service referrals, the absence of the Recovery Team from a discharge-planning meeting, and inadequate communication of the family’s concerns about her safety.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Unavailability of inpatient psychological input due to uncovered staff absence

    Wider context from the report

    “It was clear from the evidence that the deceased required psychological input. The Inquest heard evidence that whilst she was an inpatient on the Grasmere Unit there was no inpatient psychological input available due to maternity leave which had not been covered. ”

    Source location

    Roseanne Cooke · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review psychology provision across the Trust and advise on available cross-cover arrangements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust operates a process for services to plan for extended leave such as maternity leave, however I recognise, in this instance, this did not work as well as it should. I would like to assure you that additional steps will be added to the process to ensure actions and those responsible are more formally identified. These steps are detailed within the attached action plan, along with action owners and dates for completion, and include:”

    Source location

    2014-0485-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 November 2014

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Produce extended-leave plans with clear deadlines and alternative psychology arrangements identified at least four weeks before planned leave.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust operates a process for services to plan for extended leave such as maternity leave, however I recognise, in this instance, this did not work as well as it should. I would like to assure you that additional steps will be added to the process to ensure actions and those responsible are more formally identified. These steps are detailed within the attached action plan, along with action owners and dates for completion, and include:”

    Source location

    2014-0485-Response-by-5-Borough-Partnership-NHS
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 November 2014

    Open published response

  9. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Harry WORRALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Harry Worrall had longstanding mental health issues and was admitted to secure forensic units before being discharged to community services in July 2013. He died after falling from a bridge in October 2013. The principal concern was the limited availability of psychological therapy at Avesbury House and the possible adverse consequences of discontinuing psychological input before discharge into the community; the report states there was no evidence that this lack of treatment contributed to his death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Limited availability of psychological therapy for transferred patients

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) The limited availability of psychological therapy at Avesbury House could be significant for patients who, prior to transfer there, were receiving such input. The concern was raised by Mr Worrall’s family, which I share, that this period of discontinuation of psychological input might have adverse consequences on subsequent discharge into the community. ”

    Source location

    Michael Harry WORRALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

Actions and positions describe what organisations say in published responses. Implementation is not independently verified.

Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026