Recurring concern

Failure to reliably identify and respond to clinically significant weight change

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 17 Nov 2014•Latest report 23 Jun 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to identify, review, discuss, monitor or respond to clinically significant weight gain or loss, including failure to use current weight information in multidisciplinary or other care reviews, set appropriate weight-related goals, refer for relevant support or initiate a clinical response.

Not included

  • Excludes general nutrition and hydration deficiencies where no clinically significant weight change is the material unsafe condition.
  • Excludes routine weight recording failures where the weight information is otherwise reviewed and acted upon appropriately.
  • Excludes failures concerning unrelated clinical measurements or body-composition concerns without a material patient-safety issue involving significant weight gain or loss.
  • Excludes generic multidisciplinary meeting, care-planning or documentation deficiencies where weight change is not the safety-relevant object.
Reports
8

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
9

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
14

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

49 Marine Avenue Surgery1
Brunswick Ward at Lindridge1
Department of Health and Social Care1
Hellesdon Hospital1
Jeesal Akman Care Corporation Limited1
Jeesal Holdings Limited1
Jeesal Residential Care Services Limited1
Leeds City Council1
Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust1
Moorbridge1
Moorfield House Surgery1
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence1
New Park Residential Home1
NHS North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board1
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Northumberland

    AI-generated summary

    REDACTED Deceased · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    The deceased was a 17-year-old girl with autism, anxiety, significant weight loss and extreme malnutrition who died in hospital on 5 May 2024 after cardiac output was lost following vomiting during preparation for insertion of a central venous line. The principal concerns included inadequate monitoring of her weight, lack of face-to-face assessments, failure to refer or escalate care appropriately, discharge from CAMHS without direct assessment, poor communication and unclear oversight of outpatient care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to share clinically significant eating and weight information with an appropriate body

    Wider context from the report

    “5.The Passage of information/communication Communication: I heard about the importance of the passage of information. During the course of the inquest a witness was taken to the SEN chronology and an entry dated 1 March 2024 which refers to a conversation with the deceased’s mother on 29 February 2024 where she described the deceased having significant problems with her eating habits, losing weight and refusing to eat foods that would be good for her and put weight on her. I am concerned that this information was not shared to an appropriate body. ”

    Source location

    REDACTED Deceased · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review information-sharing, safeguarding policies, and related procedures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Regarding your concerns outlined in section 5 of your report about the passage of information and communication, I wish to confirm that Moorbridge School takes safeguarding and information sharing with the utmost seriousness. In light of the issues raised, we have conducted a thorough review of our practices related to information sharing, safeguarding policies, and procedures.”

    Source location

    2025-0314 - Response from Moorbridge School
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce all staff understanding of safeguarding and timely information-sharing requirements through annual and ongoing training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of our annual safeguarding refresher and other relevant training throughout the academic year, all staff have and will revisit and reinforce their understanding of these policies, with particular emphasis on timely and appropriate communication with relevant bodies and agencies. This training ensures that all members of our staff remain vigilant and proactive in sharing pertinent information to safeguard the welfare of all pupils.”

    Source location

    2025-0314 - Response from Moorbridge School
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue monitoring and enhancing procedures to prevent future communication lapses.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Moorbridge prides itself on fostering a culture of openness and collaboration with partner agencies, parents, and professionals to ensure the safety and wellbeing of every pupil. We are committed to”

    Source location

    2025-0314 - Response from Moorbridge School
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop improved information-sharing strategies across primary care, secondary care, schools, mental health services and social care, including exploring monthly multidisciplinary meetings.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Communication and Information Sharing: The report highlights concerns regarding the flow of information from other agencies, including the school and mental health services. We concur that a more robust system for sharing relevant clinical and safeguarding information is essential. We are committed to improving multidisciplinary communication, including liaising more proactively with schools, mental health services, and social care teams involved with patients at risk.”

    Source location

    2025-0314 - Response from 49 Marine Avenue Surgery
    Page 1 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Execute a programme to improve interoperability and sharing of patient records, including medical history, investigations, height, weight and other vital measurements.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is recognised by NHS England that the joining up of records to achieve easy access to all the information by clinicians and 'patients/their guardians' remains a challenge and NHS England with the Department of Health and Social Care is currently executing a substantial programme of work to increase the interoperability and sharing of all patient records, including medical history, investigations and vital patient measurements (Blood pressure, Height and Weight etc) and would include centile charts in paediatric services. This has been outlined in the Governments 10 Year Plan and the ambition to develop a ‘Single Patient Record’.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver a Single Patient Record bringing patients’ medical records together in one comprehensive digital record, targeted to begin processing information by 2028.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Government’s 10 Year Health Plan commits to the delivery of a SPR. This will provide a comprehensive patient record, bringing together all of a patient’s medical records into one place which will help prevent unfortunate incidents where fragmented and disjointed information prevents treatment from being provided on time.”

    Source location

    Response from Department for Health and Social Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement SystmOne electronic records for Nutrition and Dietetics outpatient consultations, including visibility, communication, measurement tracking and auditable triage.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “3. Introduction of SystmOne as a clinical electronic records system for Nutrition and Dietetics outpatient consultations (Go Live of the Nutrition and Dietetics SystmOne unit was August 2024) provides:”

    Source location

    2025-0314 - Response from Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discuss and implement improved information sharing between primary and secondary healthcare pathways through the NENC GP/provider interface group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “38. We are fully committed in working with our CCG colleagues to ensure that any information that is shared between primary and secondary healthcare pathways and communication is implemented as part of the learning and actions from this case. This will be discussed, for action, at the NE NC GPP Provider interface group by October 2025.”

    Source location

    2025-0314 - Response from Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 7 · response
    Published 14 July 2025

    Open published response
  2. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Terence Robert TUTTLE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Terence Robert Tuttle, who lived in a care home, was admitted to hospital after testing positive for Covid-19 and was treated for acute kidney injury, pneumonia and a bleeding duodenal ulcer. His recorded poor oral intake was not acted on promptly, and he lost significant weight before being transferred to another nursing home, where he died three days later. The concerns included delayed dietetic and mental health assessments, inadequate action on weight loss, difficulties applying the Mental Capacity Act, insufficient care for a mentally unwell patient refusing food, exclusion of family from involvement in his care, and lack of recognition of serious harm.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to act on recorded weight loss

    Wider context from the report

    “2.Inaction when Mr Tuttle was losing weight even though his intake was recorded no-one acted upon this. ”

    Source location

    Terence Robert TUTTLE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The Queen Elizabeth Hospital should respond to the concerns outside the second part of the first concern.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Out of the concerns listed below I would advise that NSFT are able to respond to the second part, in italics, of the first point only. The other points would be for the QEH to respond to:”

    Source location

    2021-0265-Response-from-Hellesdon-Hospital_Published-1
    Page 1 · response
    Published 12 August 2021

    Open published response
  3. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Ben Buster KING · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ben Buster KING was detained under the Mental Health Act at Jeesal Cawston Park and died in hospital on 29 July 2020 after becoming unwell following respiratory problems and receiving sedative medication. The inquest identified concerns including failure to diagnose obesity hypoventilation syndrome, inadequate consideration of promethazine, failure to recognise the seriousness of a life-threatening situation, and wider care, observation, record-keeping and hospital communication issues.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to address weight gain and set weight-loss goals in multidisciplinary reviews

    Wider context from the report

    “7. Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) Meetings were not held every 4 to 6 weeks as required. At MDT meetings which did take place, out of date weight measurements were recorded and relied upon for Ben. His increasing weight gain was not discussed at these meetings and weight loss was not set as a desirable or essential goal ”

    Source location

    Ben Buster KING · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and improve the Pandora information system through a staff user group.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. The MD and members of the GAT have access to every resident’s care file, we also have access to a whole range of information on each resident, all of which we can access remotely. The GAT carries out regular service reviews and unannounced inspections. Where there are deficiencies, the GAT will work with the Registered Manager to correct these deficiencies which may include report writing, care planning, risk assessments and healthy living plans. As an example, the GAT recently found inconsistencies in recording of information on Pandora, with some confusion as to record entries. This led to the establishment of a Pandora User Group, to work with homes to improve consistency of recording and content.”

    Source location

    2021-0250-Response-from-Jeesal-Residential-Care-Services_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 July 2021

    Open published response
  4. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Linda Doherty · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Linda Doherty died in hospital on 7 August 2017 after developing Crohn’s Disease, intestinal failure, malnutrition, sepsis and acute kidney injury. The report identified failures to follow up CT scan findings, recognise and adequately address her nutritional deterioration, and concerns about inaccurate or incomplete nutrition monitoring and the process for placing her on end-of-life care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delay in recognising significant patient weight loss

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The MUST charts recorded that Mrs Doherty’s weight was 65kg in early June 2017 and had reduced to 57kg by 11 July 2017, yet the multi-disciplinary team caring for her did not recognize that she had lost a significant amount of weight until 1 August 2017. Consideration should be given as to whether any additional measures or training are required to prevent similar delays in the future. ”

    Source location

    Linda Doherty · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 4 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Record nutrition assessments, care plans, MUST scores, BMI, weight loss, fluid intake and food intake in the Patient Bedside Safety Booklet.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “At the time of the patient’s admission in 2017, the recording of food charts took place on loose sheets of paper. In August 2018 the ‘Patient Bedside Safety Booklet: Risk assessments and care plans’ was introduced and is now used for all in-patients. This booklet includes all the documentation for nursing assessments, for example falls management, skin integrity and cannula care.”

    Source location

    2020-0224-Response-from-East-Surrey-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
    Page 9 · response
    Published 21 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver annual MaST training on MUST scoring, nutrition screening and assessment, supported by online learning and ward-based refresher training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Dietitians had identified deficiencies in ward based nutrition screening and in early 2018 reviewed the knowledge and understanding of ward based staff. Following this review, a new training package was developed based on its findings, which has now become a clinical core topic of the Mandatory and Statutory training (MaST) at SASH which staff complete annually. Compliance is monitored via the on-line Electronic Staff Record (e-ESR) and reminders are sent to staff 3 months in advance of expiry.”

    Source location

    2020-0224-Response-from-East-Surrey-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
    Page 9 · response
    Published 21 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include MUST checks in daily ward huddles and escalate nutrition concerns to the nurse in charge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All the wards now have ‘daily huddles’, where the ward team come together to discuss nursing issues and MUST is part of the daily checks. Any problems or concerns are escalated to the nurse in charge.”

    Source location

    2020-0224-Response-from-East-Surrey-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
    Page 10 · response
    Published 21 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct twice-weekly nutritional ward rounds led by a Consultant Gastroenterologist.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “A need for a specialist multi professional Nutrition Support team was identified for the oversight of the provision of nutrition for patients with complex artificial feeding needs. This group is a national recommendation and aims to optimise the metabolic care of the sickest patients in hospital, by performing regular nutrition ward rounds with supporting members e.g. surgeons and feeding into the proposed complex nutrition MDT meeting. The team consists of a gastroenterology consultant, nutrition nurse specialist, senior nutrition support dietitian and a pharmacist. In October 2020, the Trust appointed a Consultant Gastroenterologist with a special interest in nutrition who has reviewed the current nutrition policies, procedures and service at SASH.”

    Source location

    2020-0224-Response-from-East-Surrey-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
    Page 10 · response
    Published 21 December 2020

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a formal complex nutrition MDT meeting with active surgeon membership.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Twice weekly nutritional ward rounds are now taking place, led by this Consultant Gastroenterologist, and a monthly complex nutrition MDT meeting will be operational by April 2021. This will be a forum for surgeons and dietitians to meet monthly to review nutritional needs of specific patients, any refusal of treatment and the use of parental nutrition.”

    Source location

    2020-0224-Response-from-East-Surrey-Hospital-Redacted.pdf
    Page 10 · response
    Published 21 December 2020

    Open published response
  5. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Derek LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Derek LEE died on 5 June 2016 following an admission to Brunswick Ward. The report identified numerous concerns about his care, including medication management, incomplete assessments and documentation, falls and pressure-sore prevention, delayed referrals and treatment, nutrition, mobility, and the absence of a care co-ordinator. The inquest concluded that the death was from natural causes, and the report stated that the identified failings did not change the outcome.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to respond to substantial weight loss

    Wider context from the report

    “(8) The MUST score was properly calculated on admission but not reviewed when it was clear he was not eating. There was no evidence of any reaction to Mr Lee’s substantial weight loss. There was no referral to dieticians. They just happened to attend a multi-disciplinary meeting on the 9th May (he was admitted on the 27th April and by the 9th May had lost 10 and ¾ pounds – 4.80 kilos). Re-weighing was requested by the dieticians. It did not take place. ”

    Source location

    Derek LEE · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Brighton and Hove

    AI-generated summary

    Jack MOLYNEUX · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jack MOLYNEUX was awaiting discharge to a nursing home after admission to a ward for elderly male patients, where he had dementia but no acute physical illness. The report describes concerns about inadequate care, including failures relating to mobility, hydration, nutrition, mouth care, personal hygiene, psychological wellbeing, stimulation and medication, and states that these omissions and failings contributed to his death. His death was unexpected after transfer to the nursing home, where his condition and engagement reportedly improved.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to monitor nutritional status and refer for dietary support

    Wider context from the report

    “Mr Jack MOLYNEUX was awaiting discharge to an appropriate Nursing Home. He was on a 19 bedded ward for elderly male patients and during that time he was not suffering from any acute physical illness, but he did however have moderately advanced mixed alzheimer’s and vascular dementia and he needed to be mobilised, he needed to be appropriately hydrated and have his nutrition maintained. He needed mouth care, he had dentures but the top plate was lost. He needed personal hygiene, he needed to have his psychological wellbeing maintained and he needed stimulation and he also needed to have his medications given to him appropriately. It was clear that he did not have mental capacity, it was clear that he could not consider the consequences of his decisions not to accept care or hydration and nutrition or his medications and yet no consideration was given of placing him on a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding Order. He needed, but he didn’t receive full care in respect of all the matters mentioned above. Mobility He was never helped to mobilise or to maintain the good mobility which he had when he came into hospital. He was never offered to have his out door clothes and perhaps to be assisted to go down to the hospital shop to buy a newspaper which was something he used to do every day before he came into hospital. He lost 20% of his bodyweight in the one calendar month when he was in hospital and absolutely no note was taken of this and he wasn’t referred to the dieticians until he had been in hospital for almost that full calendar month. His mouth was in such an appalling state when he moved to his nursing home that the nursing home immediately raised a safeguarding alert on the grounds of neglect. His dentures were lost and his mouth was in such a poor state that the staff, on Vallance Ward, were unaware that he even had a lower plate in his mouth. His personal hygiene was such that whilst it was noted he was washed there was no evidence whatsoever that he was ever offered a bath or shower in the four weeks of his admission. There was no evidence whatsoever that any form of stimulation was provided. There was a television by his bed but no evidence that anybody ever discussed with him whether he might like to watch anything on it. With regard to his psychological wellbeing this appeared from the evidence before me to have been completely disregarded. Finally with regard to his medications he refused all his medications on an inconsistent basis but he did take his Memantine for pretty well every day of his hospital admission apart from on a couple of occasions just before he was discharged. At the Inquest I found that whilst he had been neglected during his admission, the circumstances did not reach the required standards for a conclusion of neglect contributing his death. I believe this to be one of the most disturbing cases of sub optimal care that I have come across recently and I am not at all satisfied that this Inquest will result in any effective action being taken which is why I am concerned to follow up this matter and to ensure that all those who should know about this situation are informed. Certainly I found that the above omissions and failings contributed to Mr Molyneux’s death. When he arrived at the nursing home he came on the evening of the 25th January and on the 26th the staff at Partridge House achieved an almost miraculous transformation. He was dressed, although he needed the help of two members of staff, he was on his feet and assisted to mobilise to the toilet, he was sitting out in a bucket chair with other residents and was entertained with a film, his mouth was cleaned, the GP provided mouth wash and mouth gel which was applied. His halitosis which had been so strong that it could be smelt outside his room at Partridge House was resolved, he was smiling and reasonably responsive and was eating and drinking again and also engaged with his son, waving goodbye to him when he had visited on the 26th or 27th. His death was unexpected. Partridge House staff had hoped that whilst he would not have been able to go home he could at least have a reasonable standard of life and be enabled to be content. Finally, it is of note that an urgent DOLS was put in place on the morning of the 27th January 2016. ”

    Source location

    Jack MOLYNEUX · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Stoke-on-Trent and North Staffordshire

    AI-generated summary

    Janine Eugenie Pierrette KAISER · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Janine Eugenie Pierrette KAISER died at a nursing home on 21 October 2014 from lobar pneumonia, with suppurative cystitis, a sacral pressure ulcer, aortic stenosis, multiple myeloma and stroke also recorded. The principal concerns included missed turns, inaccurate or falsified records, inadequate pressure-mattress checks, poor recording of food and fluid intake, inadequate staff training and continuity, delayed referral to tissue viability nurses, and insufficient response to weight loss and safeguarding concerns. The inquest concluded that she died from significant natural disease, with a contributing sacral ulcer whose progress had been compromised by gaps in nursing care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to refer for dietetic assessment after considerable weight loss

    Wider context from the report

    “7. The deceased had lost a considerable amount of weight but there was no referral to a dietician (although the GP had been consulted regarding her weight loss and had prescribed supplements) The importance of the supplements was not fully appreciated by all of the staff. The deceased’s weight was maintained during a hospital stay but deteriorated on her return to New Park Nursing Home ”

    Source location

    Janine Eugenie Pierrette KAISER · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issues arising after the hospital return were not notified to the City Council, so they were not investigated by it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. Twice daily pressure mattress checks were fully completed indicating an appropriately functioning mattress. However when a mattress check was made by Tissue Viability Nurses the mattress was not alternating and the fault alarm on the mattress had been turned off. The attention of the staff was drawn to this but it was not subsequently recorded in the deceased’s records. The staff were inadequately trained in pressure mattress management. They apparently checked that the mattress had a power source but did not check that the mattress was functioning correctly.”

    Source location

    2015-0272-Response-by-Stoke-on-Trent-Council_Redacted
    Page 4 · response
    Published 14 July 2015

    Open published response
  8. West Yorkshire (East)

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Gladys Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Gladys Smith died while resident at a care home; the supplied text does not provide further circumstances of her death. The concerns included failures in repositioning, bruise and wound monitoring, falls assessment, weight and nutrition monitoring, dementia care, and delays or gaps in district nursing wound documentation and referral. The report also identified a lack of comprehensive national guidance on wounds and ulcers caused by impact injuries.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to implement nutrition charts for residents with significant weight loss

    Wider context from the report

    “(f) Despite the aforesaid weight loss experienced by Mrs Smith, at no time was a nutrition chart implemented in order to monitor Mrs Smith's nutritional intake. Moreover, medical advice in relation to Mrs Smith's weight loss was only sought a number of weeks after the commencement of the said weight loss. In the circumstances, Care Home staff should ensure nutrition charts are completed in respect of any resident whose weight falls significantly and should ensure appropriate medical advice is sought at the first available opportunity following such a fall in weight; ”

    Source location

    Mrs Gladys Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in seeking medical advice after significant resident weight loss

    Wider context from the report

    “(f) Despite the aforesaid weight loss experienced by Mrs Smith, at no time was a nutrition chart implemented in order to monitor Mrs Smith's nutritional intake. Moreover, medical advice in relation to Mrs Smith's weight loss was only sought a number of weeks after the commencement of the said weight loss. In the circumstances, Care Home staff should ensure nutrition charts are completed in respect of any resident whose weight falls significantly and should ensure appropriate medical advice is sought at the first available opportunity following such a fall in weight; ”

    Source location

    Mrs Gladys Smith · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026