Recurring concern

Failure to provide timely and adequate follow-up after discharge

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 30 Jan 2013•Latest report 23 Oct 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures of the post-discharge process, including absent or delayed follow-up care, appointments, referrals, contact, treatment plans, monitoring, or community support where these are needed after discharge.

Not included

  • Excludes failures confined to pre-discharge assessment or the discharge decision unless they directly concern arranging continuing post-discharge care.
  • Excludes missed-appointment follow-up where no discharge or post-discharge care process is involved.
  • Excludes generic staffing, communication, documentation or community-care deficiencies unless they directly cause or form part of inadequate follow-up after discharge.
  • Excludes unrelated care transitions that do not concern follow-up after discharge.
Reports
55

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
66

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
56

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care8
NHS England5
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust4
Care Quality Commission3
Midlands Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust3
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board3
Black Country Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust2
East London NHS Foundation Trust2
Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership2
Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust2
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust2
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust2
Aneurin Bevan University LHB1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Betsi Cadwaladr University LHB1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Antonis Tofali Hannides · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Antonis Tofali Hannides died on 29 March 2019 from liver and heart disease after undergoing hernia repair and subsequently reattending hospital with confusion. Concerns included the lack of a formal system for managing unexpected reattendance after discharge, inadequate documentation, and failure to inform his consultant immediately.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a formal system for seeing patients who reattend unexpectedly after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “No formal system at Spire Bristol for 1) Seeing patients who reattend unexpectedly after discharge; 2) Ensuring full and comprehensive record keeping in accordance with GMC and NMC guidance; 3) Ensuring that consultants are informed immediately of any patient who reattends unexpectedly after discharge. ”

    Source location

    Antonis Tofali Hannides · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update the Admission and Discharge policy to require assessment, consultant notification, documented follow-up and incident tracking for unexpected post-discharge re-attendances.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In light of the concerns raised at the Inquest, Spire Healthcare has updated its National Clinical Admission and Discharge policy (copy enclosed at Appendix A) to ensure that the existing triage process applies equally to patients who unexpectedly re-attend the hospital (as happened in Mr Hannides’ case). In such circumstances, the policy provides that the patient must be reviewed by an RMO. The patients’ consultant must be informed of their attendance post-discharge and the RMO or nurse reviewing the patient must document that the consultant has been notified (and when), and whether advice has been sought from the consultant. Where advice was not specifically sought before providing care, for example as a result of minor concerns, the reasons for not doing so should also be documented.”

    Source location

    2019-0382-Response-from-Spire-Bristol-Hospital_Redacted
    Page 2 · response
    Published 27 December 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing admission and discharge procedures provided a formal process for managing patients who contacted or re-attended after discharge.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “It is anticipated that some patients who have undergone treatment at a Spire Hospital may contact the Hospital with enquiries about their care after discharge. As such, Spire Healthcare has an Admission and Discharge policy (in place at the time of Mr Hannides’ admission) which outlines a number of key steps that must take place as part of any patients’ discharge planning process, to ensure that patients are supported after they leave hospital and are aware of how to seek advice if they have concerns.”

    Source location

    2019-0382-Response-from-Spire-Bristol-Hospital_Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 27 December 2019

    Open published response
  2. Cheshire

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Jane Chapman · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Jane Chapman underwent elective knee replacement surgery and was discharged with a low platelet count, but a required follow-up blood test was not arranged. She was later admitted with a dangerously low platelet count and died on 4 March 2018 from a large myocardial infarction caused by coronary artery thrombosis associated with catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. The principal concerns related to unclear discharge responsibilities and procedures, inadequate communication and documentation of critical follow-up investigations, and insufficient evidence that subsequent changes had improved these processes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of guidance for arranging and communicating critical post-discharge investigations

    Wider context from the report

    “2) There is no clear local or Nuffield-wide guidance document or policy on how the need for critical post-discharge investigations should be arranged or communicated, or by whom or when; ”

    Source location

    Mary Jane Chapman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure clear and unambiguous procedures for implementing post-discharge investigation decisions

    Wider context from the report

    “6) The fact that Nuffield is a private hospital means that the doctors working there are likely to come from a variety of different hospitals and will be used to a variety of different working practices. Whilst the decision about what post-discharge investigations are required is clearly a matter of clinical judgment, the responsibility for ensuring that clear and unambiguous procedures exist to implement those clinical decisions lies with the Nuffield. ”

    Source location

    Mary Jane Chapman · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Rewrite the national discharge policy to clarify multidisciplinary roles, responsibilities, discharge scenarios and arrangements for critical post-discharge investigations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1) The revised Nuffield Health Policy (Appendix B) is rewritten paying particular attention to clarity of role and responsibilities associated with different professionals within the multidisciplinary team, with regard to the patient discharge process. The process itself has greater clarity and considers all scenarios that may present for patients using Nuffield Health services.”

    Source location

    2019-0360-Response-by-Nuffield-Health
    Page 3 · response
    Published 22 November 2019

    Open published response
  3. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Mr Peter Lawrence (PL) · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mr Peter Lawrence, a 48-year-old man with paranoid schizophrenia and a history of disengagement from mental health services, was found outside his flat on 8 February 2019 after falling from the balcony and died from traumatic injuries. Concerns included the lack of a joint multi-disciplinary/agency care plan, inconsistent care coordination, and the absence of a coordinated mental health assessment and possible admission when concerns about self-care and disengagement arose.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate follow-up engagement and monitoring after discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “5. When PL was successful at the mental health tribunal and was discharged from Section 3 following his last admission to hospital in October 2017 against the view of the multidisciplinary team. The agencies involved placed too much reliance on this decision and follow up engagement and monitoring with PL reduced becoming inadequate. ”

    Source location

    Mr Peter Lawrence (PL) · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mellin Beard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mellin Beard, who had complex health problems including spinal cord compression and reduced mobility, developed pressure sores that later deteriorated despite care. He died on 16 October 2018 from left ventricular failure due to ischaemic and hypertensive heart disease, with infected pressure sores among the contributing health problems. Concerns included delays in referrals for community nursing after hospital discharge and significant reliance on agency nurses.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide timely referrals for discharged patients requiring community nursing services

    Wider context from the report

    “1. A member of the Trust’s community nursing team gave evidence to the effect that it was ‘common’ not to receive timely referrals in respect of patients who were discharged from hospital and required community nursing services. Whilst it was apparent from the evidence before the court as a whole that this concern does not relate solely to patients who have been receiving in-patient care at Tameside General Hospital, and that some improvements have been made with the introduction of an e-discharge system, it is a matter of particular concern that this problem continues to subsist at the Trust in particular due to the integrated care model as between acute and community services the organisation purports to espouse; ”

    Source location

    Mellin Beard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Move all Trust referrals to District Nurses onto an electronic portal.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As part of our investigation into your concern, discussions have been held with the Head of Nursing, Community Adults, the Service Director and Lead Nurses of the Trust's Intermediate Tier Services, and the Team Lead for SPOC in relation to ongoing improvements in the District Nursing referral process. I am happy to inform you that we will be moving onto an electronic portal for all referrals to District Nurses made within the Trust. Once this has been running for a while, we will investigate the potential for non-Trust agencies to also use this portal for referrals, as we receive a high number of referrals from care homes.”

    Source location

    2019-0157-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Tighten referral processes while migrating from fax machines to electronic communication systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Given we are still working towards moving onto the electronic system, we have taken steps to tighten our processes in the meantime and are currently working through our strategy for the removal of all fax machines and the migration to electronic communication systems.”

    Source location

    2019-0157-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reinforce clinical incident reporting for missed referrals to support investigation, learning and training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Further, whenever a missed referral is identified by any member of staff, they have a responsibility to raise a clinical incident report so that the matter can be investigated. District Nurses have continuously reinforced the importance of a robust incident-reporting culture so as to ensure further incidents can be prevented and appropriate learning and training can take place to keep patients safe.”

    Source location

    2019-0157-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Track missed-referral incidents and escalate identified trends or themes through divisional meetings for timely action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to reviewing individual incidents, which are raised when a missed referral is identified, these incidents are tracked by relevant services and any trends or themes are looked for to ensure these are quickly identified and addressed. Any trends or themes that are identified are highlighted to the relevant divisions in their regular divisional meetings so that appropriate steps can be taken to address them in a timely manner.”

    Source location

    2019-0157-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Missed referrals are not considered common, based on team experience, incident review and evidence from the referral service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As mentioned above, we have made enquiries to assist you in understanding more fully if missed referrals are ‘common’. A meeting took place at the beginning of June with the Trust's entire group of District Nursing Team Leads and their Matron at which a discussion was had regarding the regularity of missed referrals. The consensus was very much that this was not a ‘common’ or regular occurrence from their professional experience. A review of all incidents detailing a missed referral from March 2018 to March 2019 was completed. This review found that a total of eight missed referrals were identified in this twelve month period. A rate 0.67 missed referrals per month is not considered to be ‘common’ by the Trust. Enquiries were also made with the Trust's Single Point of Contact [SPOC], which is a Trust service that receives and triages all referrals to District Nurses trust-wide.”

    Source location

    2019-0157-Response-by-Tameside-and-Glossop-Integrated-Care-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 28 July 2019

    Open published response
  5. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Ruth Ellen Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mrs Ruth Ellen Edwards died at home on 31 August 2018 after hanging herself from an attic ladder, following a long history of mental health problems and previous suicide attempts. Concerns included her discharge after a drug overdose without psychiatric liaison assessment, inadequate risk assessment and inaccurate communication about the overdose, and potentially insufficient medication reviews despite access to many medications at home.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange psychiatric liaison assessment and professional follow-up after overdose

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Mrs Edwards’ discharge from hospital following overdose on 23rd August to see GP was surprising. It was expected in these circumstances that Mrs Edwards would have been transferred to Llandough Hospital for a psychiatric liaison assessment. Instead, responsibility for any further assessment and treatment of Mrs Edwards was passed entirely to Mrs Edwards and her family. A less capable family/individual may not have pursued help and fallen through the cracks. Furthermore, had Mrs Edwards been hospitalised, her treatment may have been different. ”

    Source location

    Mrs Ruth Ellen Edwards · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use the Bristol Matrix to identify patients requiring psychiatric assessment, supported by established staff training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The identification of patients who require immediate psychiatric assessments and review by specialist teams.”

    Source location

    2018-0395-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing Bristol Matrix procedures and established training are considered sufficient to identify patients requiring immediate psychiatric assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The identification of patients who require immediate psychiatric assessments and review by specialist teams.”

    Source location

    2018-0395-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 May 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Home treatment with frequent specialist input was considered appropriate, balancing admission risks and the patient's unwillingness to be admitted.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The UHB would absolutely concur that some families may not have been in a position to provide ongoing support, but the judgement that Mrs Edwards might remain at home with regular and frequent input from the REACT team was made with the conscious participation and agreement of all, including the team, the patient and the family.”

    Source location

    2018-0395-Response-by-University-Health-Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 May 2019

    Open published response
  6. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Stephen Peter Jackson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Stephen Peter Jackson was found deceased at home on 11 August 2018 after sending his mother a text message saying “sorry”; drugs paraphernalia and a suicide note were present, and the provisional cause of death was a diamorphine overdose. The report raised concerns that he was not seen by mental health clinicians after his GP requested an urgent appointment, despite reported low mood and negative thoughts, and that delays and possible under-funding of mental health services posed a risk of future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide timely mental health follow-up after hospital discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “1. On the 1st August 2018 Mr. Jackson attended his GP and expressed frustration that following his discharge from hospital on the 23rd July 2018. He had not been contacted by the home treatment team and his GP wrote to the Kingstanding and Erdington Home Treatment Team that same day asking them to expedite his appointment, reporting that Mr. Jackson continued to have low mood and negative thoughts and merited an urgent appointment. 2. Mr. Jackson was not seen by mental health clinicians following the GP request. ”

    Source location

    Stephen Peter Jackson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  7. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Mary Barbara Ryder · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mary Barbara Ryder underwent surgery for bladder cancer and was discharged after receiving Clexane, with reduced mobility and no further clinical review regarding Clexane. She later deteriorated, was diagnosed with a pulmonary embolism and died on 21 August 2017. The inquest raised concerns that guidance did not address whether some patients with ongoing reduced mobility might require longer treatment or emphasise review after discharge.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to emphasise review of post-operative prophylaxis after discharge home

    Wider context from the report

    “The inquest heard that: The guidance nationally is to prescribe clexane for 28 days after an operation. However, the guidance does not suggest that some cases may require longer where a patients mobility remains reduced. There does not appear to be an emphasis on the need to review the situation throughout the post-operative period after a discharge home. ”

    Source location

    Mary Barbara Ryder · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    NICE concluded that its VTE guidelines are appropriate and require no amendment at this time.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “My officials have made enquiries with the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on the matter of concern you have raised.”

    Source location

    2018-0323-Response-by-Department-of-Health-Social-Care
    Page 1 · response
    Published 24 February 2019

    Open published response
  8. Southampton and New Forest

    AI-generated summary

    Nigel Malloy · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Nigel Malloy fell from a second-floor window on 29 October 2017 while intoxicated with alcohol, suffered severe head injuries, and died in hospital two days later. He was alcohol dependent and had depressive symptoms, with previous similar falls and multiple hospital admissions, but concerns were raised that there was no information sharing or coordinated treatment plan between the relevant alcohol-support services.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide follow-up after emergency department admissions for alcohol-related presentations

    Wider context from the report

    “The Deceased was alcohol dependant and suffered depressive symptoms. On 22 May 2017 he fell from a window in circumstances very similar to those on 29 October 2017 and on that occasion suffered head injuries and was taken to Southampton General Hospital. After this fall he was regularly drinking excess alcohol leading to multiple admissions to the Emergency Department at Royal Hampshire County Hospital Winchester operated by Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (HHFT), but was then discharged once sober without any follow up. On 22 September 2017 he referred himself to the Inclusion Service provided by South Staffordshire & Shropshire NHS Foundation Trust (SSSFT) and started to receive some assistance. On 16 October 2017 the deceased sustained a fall in the street and was taken to Winchester hospital for treatment of his head wound but discharged the same day. There was no sharing of information between the Alcohol Liaison service provided by HHFT and the Inclusion Service provided by SSSFT or coordinated plan to treat his alcohol dependence. ”

    Source location

    Nigel Malloy · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain a 24-hour referral service and dedicated pathway with the Inclusion Service.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A 24 hour referral service and dedicated pathway with Inclusion”

    Source location

    2018-0232-Response-by-Hampshire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide alcohol-service inpatient access through weekly and arranged ad hoc Inclusion inreach.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• At the time of Mr Malloy’s admissions to the Trust, Inclusion were running a weekly inreach service on a Sunday.”

    Source location

    2018-0232-Response-by-Hampshire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Maintain telephone and onsite liaison with Inclusion regarding referrals and referred patients receiving inpatient care.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Regular telephone liaison between Inclusion and the Trust when one of their users is an inpatient or in relation to referrals”

    Source location

    2018-0232-Response-by-Hampshire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Participate in a monthly multi-provider High Intensity User Group to identify further support for frequent attenders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Monthly High Intensity User Group involving multiple providers to discuss whether there is any further support which can be provided to high intensity users such as Mr Malloy”

    Source location

    2018-0232-Response-by-Hampshire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 23 September 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Existing referral, liaison, follow-up and high-intensity-user arrangements are considered sufficient to address the reported concerns.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As per our response to point 2 above, the Trust made the initial referral to Inclusion on 21.09.17 and subsequently liaised with them to arrange Mr Malloy’s first attendance and ensure that Mr Malloy had attended as planned.”

    Source location

    2018-0232-Response-by-Hampshire-Hospitals-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 23 September 2018

    Open published response
  9. Inner South London

    AI-generated summary

    Michael Vukovic · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Michael Vukovic, who was suffering psychosis, jumped from a second- or third-floor balcony on 8 July 2017 and sustained an L1 vertebral fracture. He suffered a cardiac arrest and hypoxic brain damage after admission to hospital, and died on 11 July 2017. The principal concerns were that he was not seen by the Home Treatment Team, that follow-up with a drug and alcohol service was not checked, and that he was discharged without follow-up.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discharge from hospital without follow-up

    Wider context from the report

    “My specific concerns are as follows: (1) ████████ evidence that Mr Vukovic was referred to the Home Treatment Team but was never in fact seen by that team. (2) The referral to Lifeline required Mr Vukovic to make the initial contact himself. He did not do so, and Oxleas did not check whether or not he had done so. The evidence was that if he had been under the care of the HTT he would have been encouraged to engage with Lifeline. (3) The result was that Mr Vukovic was discharged from hospital without follow up. ”

    Source location

    Michael Vukovic · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Discharge without follow-up was considered sufficient because the family knew how to access crisis support if required.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(3) Mr Vukovic was discharged from hospital without follow up.”

    Source location

    Michael-Vukovic-Response
    Page 2 · response
    Published 8 June 2018

    Open published response
  10. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Francis Robert Beech · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Francis Robert Beech had a conservatively treated right ankle fracture and was discharged to a nursing home, where monitoring and care planning for his plaster cast were not arranged. Infection signs were present by 1 July 2017 but were not investigated promptly, and he later developed a severely infected compound fracture and pressure sores before dying from bronchopneumonia contributed to by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and the infected fracture site.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange an outpatient appointment within 3 weeks of discharge

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Failing to arrange an outpatient appointment within 3 weeks of discharge. ”

    Source location

    Francis Robert Beech · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to arrange weekly post-discharge x-rays to monitor fracture alignment

    Wider context from the report

    “3. Failing to arrange weekly x-rays after discharge to check for fracture alignment and to monitor the fracture. ”

    Source location

    Francis Robert Beech · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Formulate and implement guidelines for conservatively managed potentially unstable fractures, including follow-up and X-ray review timescales.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Following the findings from this report, guidelines will be formulated for clinicians to follow for these patients. These will include recommended timescales for follow-up and x-ray reviews to be used in conjunction with clinical judgement. The new guidelines will be called ‘Conservative Management of Unstable Fractures’ and will be implemented by the Trust by 31 March 2018. Once the guideline has been implemented, the Directorate will audit compliance. If you would like to see the guidelines, please let me know.”

    Source location

    2017-0367-Responses
    Page 1 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Create three daily hot-clinic slots to provide capacity for expedited post-discharge Trauma and Orthopaedic follow-up.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has taken steps to reduce the time that a patient will now experience when awaiting an outpatient appointment for a consultant in Trauma & Orthopaedics. To support patients being seen in outpatient appointments expeditiously the Trust has created 3 daily “hot clinic” slots for post discharge follow-up. This will ensure that there is capacity to facilitate these reviews.”

    Source location

    2017-0367-Responses
    Page 3 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add the date of X-ray performance and review to consultant handover documentation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The consultant on-call rota is run on a weekly basis with changeover on Friday. Currently, the exiting consultant completes a handover sheet for every patient, during his/her ward round, which includes appropriate discharge planning. This is filed within the patient’s notes. It provides helpful information for the receiving consultant, such as original diagnosis, management plan and any salient changes to the patients’ condition during his on call week. Following this incident, a further point will be added on the handover asking for the date when an X-Ray was performed and reviewed. This will emphasize the need for regular X-Ray reviews as will be outlined in the new guidelines. Furthermore, there is a formal handover which takes place every Friday between the exiting and incoming consultants. The current process will be maintained but will be strengthened by the new guidelines.”

    Source location

    2017-0367-Responses
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Highlight to Trauma and Orthopaedic consultants the responsibility to arrange clear management plans and weekly X-rays for conservatively managed fractures.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “████████ has highlighted this case with all Trauma & Orthopaedic Consultants at the Trust to highlight the importance of ensuring that a clear management plan and weekly x-rays are arranged for patients not suitable for surgical stabilisation. It has been strongly emphasised to all that this will be the responsibility of the consultant who made the initial decision to treat the patient conservatively. The new guidelines will also be made available for all clinicians to refer to.”

    Source location

    2017-0367-Responses
    Page 2 · response
    Published 11 February 2018

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026