Recurring concern

Failure to reliably identify and communicate individual patient risk factors

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 20 Nov 2013•Latest report 13 Jan 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes failures to identify, assess, document or communicate individual patient risk factors to the clinicians responsible for the patient’s care, including failures to raise known risk factors with consultants and failures of mechanisms intended to ensure relevant clinicians are aware of them.

Not included

  • Excludes generic clinical communication, handover or record-keeping deficiencies where individual patient risk factors are not the material unsafe object.
  • Excludes risk-assessment failures confined to a separately named hazard or pathway, such as VTE, self-harm, mental-health or pregnancy risk, when that named concern provides the more specific supported boundary.
  • Excludes failures to act on risk factors after they have been reliably identified and communicated, unless the identification or communication process is also deficient.
  • Excludes generic organisational risk-assessment criteria or staff competence concerns that are not specifically about identifying or communicating individual patient risk factors.
Reports
11

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
12

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2013–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
18

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care2
Abbey Dale House1
Ashford and St Peter'S Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Barts Health NHS Trust1
Birmingham Women'S and Children'S NHS Foundation Trust1
Circle Health Group Limited1
Greater Manchester1
Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust1
Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
NHS England1
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust1
Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust1
Pentree Lodge1
Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust1
Royal London Hospital1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Birmingham and Solihull

    AI-generated summary

    Aarav Pal CHOPRA · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Aarav Pal CHOPRA died on 22 November 2023 after an intercostal artery was damaged during a liver biopsy, causing a haemothorax, cardiac arrest and hypoxic brain injury. The report identified concerns about inadequate planning and communication, delayed recognition and treatment of the haemothorax, unclear decision-making, trainee competence, consent, patient risk factors, prophylactic antibiotics, learning from deaths and access to complete electronic records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of a mechanism to identify and communicate individual patient risk factors

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Individual patient risk factors: Aarav had a complex medical background and several risk factors for any procedure. My concern is that there is currently no mechanism to identify individual patient’s risk factors so that all clinicians involved in their care are aware. ”

    Source location

    Aarav Pal CHOPRA · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement an electronic patient record providing staff with accessible medication details and individual patient risk factors.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The importance of effective communication between colleagues will be reiterated across the workforce. In addition to this, the roll out of the Electronic Patient Record (EPR), which is due to go live in May 2025 will provide the ability to see at a glance individual patient risk factors.”

    Source location

    Response from Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Carl Garry Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Carl Garry Thompson died from a drug overdose while on leave from Arden Ward, Stepping Hill Hospital, and was likely to have died on the night of 9 March 2022. Concerns included inadequate risk assessments and planning for his leave, insufficient response and escalation after family concerns about increased risk, and failure to provide a face-to-face Community Mental Health Team assessment or allocate a care coordinator before leave.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to use direct contact to understand identified risk factors

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I am concerned that the Trust’s own internal review found that whilst Carl was on leave from the 7th March, the clinical team were made aware of an increase in Carl’s risk factors when contacted by his mother who outlined her concerns. 3. The review concluded that this represented a missed opportunity for the clinical team to understand how several factors may be combining to increase the risk for Carl, including his use of non-prescription medication and illicit substance misuse. 4. The Trust’s own review concluded that the clinical team could have sought to understand these risk factors through direct contact with Carl. 5. The Trusts own review concluded that following such direct contact, consultation could have been sought with others within a legal framework to ask Carl to return to the ward with support from services or family. The review concluded that the nursing team could have escalated this information via the on-call system for further medical support. ”

    Source location

    Carl Garry Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to assess how multiple risk factors combine to increase risk

    Wider context from the report

    “2. I am concerned that the Trust’s own internal review found that whilst Carl was on leave from the 7th March, the clinical team were made aware of an increase in Carl’s risk factors when contacted by his mother who outlined her concerns. 3. The review concluded that this represented a missed opportunity for the clinical team to understand how several factors may be combining to increase the risk for Carl, including his use of non-prescription medication and illicit substance misuse. 4. The Trust’s own review concluded that the clinical team could have sought to understand these risk factors through direct contact with Carl. 5. The Trusts own review concluded that following such direct contact, consultation could have been sought with others within a legal framework to ask Carl to return to the ward with support from services or family. The review concluded that the nursing team could have escalated this information via the on-call system for further medical support. ”

    Source location

    Carl Garry Thompson · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Raise awareness of contacting patients on leave when concerns arise through supervision and an inpatient learning forum.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “This was identified as an action within the Investigation detailed ‘Where there are concerns expressed whilst a patient is on leave – consider making attempts to contact the patient to assess the situation.’”

    Source location

    Response from Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 17 May 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue booking staff onto Clinical Risk Formulation and STORM training, while monitoring uptake and compliance with essential-to-role training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To address this point, the steps the service has taken so far are: - Shared learning for the staff team, this has been shared via supervision and the Care Hub Quality Learning forum. - ████████ consultant team, this has been shared via the lead ████████ patient meeting to support the importance of well-documented risk assessments. - ████████ trust, this has been shared as trust wide learning for ████████ within the footprint to be aware of and learn from. - Continued commitment to booking staff on the Clinical Risk Formulation ████████ STORM (suicide prevention skills) training; ward manager and service manager will monitor uptake and compliance with essential to role training.”

    Source location

    Response from Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 May 2023

    Open published response
  3. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    William DOLEMAN and 3 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Four patients died following ERCP-related complications within a six-month period. The concerns included inadequate pre-procedure assessment and patient pathways, insufficient recording of procedure vetting, non-personalised consent, and unclear accountability between professionals for vetting and consent.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to identify all patient factors relevant to the clinical indication for and safety of ERCP before the procedure

    Wider context from the report

    “1. A lack of robust patient pathway to ensure that all patient factors relevant to the clinical indication for, and safety of, ERCP are identified in advance of the procedure and discussed with the patient. ”

    Source location

    William DOLEMAN and 3 others · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement the redesigned Medway-based ERCP referral pathway with expanded clinical-risk and consent information fields.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The following actions have been taken to address this concern:”

    Source location

    2021-0432-Response-from-City-Hospital-Campus_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 December 2021

    Open published response
  4. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly

    AI-generated summary

    Dylan Jay Henty · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dylan Jay Henty had a complex medical history including schizophrenia, a cerebral tumour, communication difficulties and seizures. He went missing after declining prescribed medication on 17 February 2018, and his body was found at Fistral beach on 21 February 2018; the cause of death was recorded as multiple injuries, with no evidence explaining the apparent fall or how he entered the sea. Concerns included an unsupervised seizure in a bath, inadequate awareness of hoarding, medication compliance, inconsistent reporting of absconding incidents, and arrangements for monitoring residents at risk of absconding.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate previous hoarding incidents to the GP

    Wider context from the report

    “ii. Dylan’s GP was unaware of previous incidents of hoarding. He felt this was something that should have been brought to his attention. You may wish to reflect on the need for clear guidance and training to all staff in such matters. Similarly, you may wish to reflect on the need for those in management positions to ensure rigorous compliance with the relevant standards. ”

    Source location

    Dylan Jay Henty · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review care-note wording for medication non-adherence and hoarding incidents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “4. The home also reviewed the wording used when undertaking care notes, such as hoarding. It could be argued in opinion whether two tablets found could be deemed hoarding, also if not taking three tablets is deemed medically as non compliant. Of”

    Source location

    2019-0334-Response-by-Pentree-Lodge-Care-Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish direct liaison and incident-notification arrangements with GPs, mental health services, care teams, and police for relevant health and absconding events.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “5. The home recognised that there were communication errors between MDT and can only apologise. Firstly we now liaise with the GP and mental health team regarding relevant issues we face. Notifying all concerned via telephone or email and documenting where appropriate. All incidents of absconding are reported to the relevant bodies ranging from the Care Team to the Police. Measures are then taken to prevent further incidents occuring, such as observations following the relevant laws and legislations such as DOL’s , Capacity Assessment, Mental Health Assessment that need to take place before the home has the power to prevent someone leaving the building as the home is an open facility. Lawfully this documentation needs to be put in place and legislation followed.”

    Source location

    2019-0334-Response-by-Pentree-Lodge-Care-Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 10 November 2019

    Open published response
  5. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Mrs Alice Doris Dixon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Alice Doris Dixon attended St Peter’s Hospital for investigation of anaemia and shortness of breath and suffered an anaphylactic shock during a CT scan involving injected contrast dye. She was admitted to intensive care, later treated palliatively, and died from the consequences of the shock. Concerns included inadequate support and communication during consent, incomplete and unclear consent documentation, lack of clinical assessment immediately before the scan, missing information about vulnerabilities, and difficulty observing or hearing her breathing difficulties during the scan.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to document patient vulnerabilities for radiographer use

    Wider context from the report

    “10. There was no note to assist the radiographer with any vulnerabilities Mrs Dixon had (including cranial hearing and understanding difficulties and issues that she was not able to lie flat) ”

    Source location

    Mrs Alice Doris Dixon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  6. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Dawn Patricia GILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Dawn Patricia Gill, a long-term drug user, died from a methadone overdose after taking illicit drugs while in the Royal London Hospital alongside prescribed medication. Concerns included the absence of a nursing care plan addressing her drug use, the loss of her drug chart, failures to detect her in her room during searches, and confusion about when to alert hospital security after she was thought to be missing.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate suspected illicit drug use and associated ward-leaving risk to nursing staff

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Ms Gill was a long term drug user and, based on her history, was likely to take illicit drugs whether she was in or out of hospital. However, while she was in hospital, no nursing care plan was made to take this into account, for example by acknowledging the higher risk that it brought. One nursing sister was not even aware that staff suspected Ms Gill of going off the ward to take drugs. ”

    Source location

    Dawn Patricia GILL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Remind nursing teams to document suspected illicit drug use in care plans and include it in nursing handovers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “During her stay in hospital the wider nursing team and medical staff were aware of the suspicion of Ms Gill taking illicit drugs. She had been spoken to by the consultant and charge nurse and the senior nurse to advise this was not acceptable. However the nursing care plan could and should have been more explicit about this, and if it had been nursing staff would have been more aware of her behaviour and the attendant risks. All nursing teams in the hospital are being reminded of the importance of documenting the use of suspected use of illicit drugs in care plans, and of ensuring this information is part of the nursing handover.”

    Source location

    2018-0354-Response-by-Barts-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 25 April 2019

    Open published response
  7. Manchester West

    AI-generated summary

    William Myers · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    William Myers, aged 79, was unlawfully killed; the medical cause of death was multiple stab wounds. The principal concerns related to inconsistent and inappropriate community care of his attacker, including failures to coordinate treatment, recognise warning signs, share relevant information, act on recommendations for Mental Health Act assessment, and maintain adequate records.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to circulate important clinical risk information to treating clinicians

    Wider context from the report

    “(3) Valuable background information was not circulated to those involved in his treatment with the result that they were deprived of the crucially important medical history of the potential risks (particularly the attacker was no longer taking the medication which controlled his behaviour and was once again resorted to using illicit drugs). An example of this concerns a 20 page discharge report prepared by a Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist at the time the attacker was being prepared to leave Ashworth High Security Hospital. This report not seem to have been material to the Care Coordinator, the GP nor the Consultant Psychiatrist who undertook treatment on two different psychiatric wards and in the community. ”

    Source location

    William Myers · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require formal discharge care plans, risk assessments and consultant oversight for high-risk discharges.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The trust is reviewing all care-planning procedures in the light of the lessons learned from this case to ensure that there is continuity of care and a consistent management plan with particular emphasis on high-risk individuals. Discharge procedures have also been reviewed and high-risk patients should not be discharged without a completed formal discharge care plan and risk assessment with consultant oversight. The discharge care plans will include consideration of the risk of disengagement and non-compliance and the response to these.”

    Source location

    2018-0022-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 14 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Identify patients with significant forensic histories in AMIGOS special notes to inform care and discharge planning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Patients with a significant forensic history are now being identified on the newly developed special notes system within AMIGOS the current Electronic Patient Record used in our Manchester services so that individuals presenting will have care plans and discharge plans, which are informed by these risks.”

    Source location

    2018-0022-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 March 2018

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce the approved PARIS electronic clinical record system across Manchester services.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “GMMH has developed a business case to introduce the PARIS electronic clinical record system bring our Manchester services in line with the wider Trust. This has now been approved by the GMMH Trust Board and will be introduced over the next 12-15 months. This will further enhance accessibility of these assessments to the treating teams.”

    Source location

    2018-0022-Response-by-Greater-Manchester-Mental-Health-NHS-Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 14 March 2018

    Open published response
  8. Wiltshire and Swindon

    AI-generated summary

    Joyce Violet Rumming · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joyce Violet Rumming attended the Accident and Emergency Department on 11 December 2016 and was given Amoxicillin and Clarithromycin at 01.45 on 12 December 2016; she died just over half an hour later. The stated cause of death was respiratory failure, and the report says this did not appear to be related to an allergic reaction to Amoxicillin. The principal concern was that information about her recorded Amoxicillin allergy was not effectively communicated between systems and staff, resulting in the antibiotic being administered shortly before her death.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of software systems to communicate allergy markers to prescribing clinicians

    Wider context from the report

    “The Route Cause Analysis in relation to items (bullet points) under contributory factors documents a number of areas that give rise for concern. It essentially amounts to right hand not communicating with the left hand in that for example unless a Doctor looks in a specific location due to issues as regards the communication between various software packages that the existence of an allergic marker could be missed as was the situation in relation to Joyce's case. ”

    Source location

    Joyce Violet Rumming · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce a new electronic clinical note that includes patient allergies.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Two – Review of documentation of allergies The majority of documentation in the Emergency Department is electronic. On the electronic patient record system there is an alert section where drug allergies are to be noted. The alert notification tab is then flagged red on the patient’s home page.”

    Source location

    2017-0182-Response-by-Great-Western-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Explore the IT infrastructure interface between the electronic medication and patient record systems.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Action Three – Explore the interface between IT systems The IT infrastructure did not and still does not support sharing of information between the electronic patient medication system and the electronic patient record system. Actions two and four are to bridge this gap and ensure patient safety.”

    Source location

    2017-0182-Response-by-Great-Western-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Migrate the Emergency Department onto the Trust-wide server to improve access to electronic medication records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to this, the Emergency Department are being migrated onto the same server which the rest of the Trust uses. This will make it easier for Emergency Department staff to have access to the electronic patient medication record to look up any allergies and with the potential to prescribe medication using this system.”

    Source location

    2017-0182-Response-by-Great-Western-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The electronic handover system cannot be tailored to place key information, such as allergies, at the top for individual organisations.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Clinical Risk team had liaised with the local ambulance trust to see whether any changes can be made to the electronic system so that key information, such as allergies, is at the top of the handover document. Our local ambulance trust works with many acute hospitals in the South West region. We have been advised that it is not possible to make”

    Source location

    2017-0182-Response-by-Great-Western-Hospital-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2017

    Open published response
  9. Preston and West Lancashire

    AI-generated summary

    Sally Ann Tooze Froggatt · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sally Ann Tooze Froggatt died on 6 April 2015 at Royal Lancaster Infirmary following multiple missed opportunities to treat her high risk of venous thromboembolism. Concerns included failures in the Duty of Candour, inadequate staff training, potentially contradictory pharmacy guidance, and failure to raise known risk factors with consultants.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of nursing staff to raise known risk factors with consultants

    Wider context from the report

    “4. failure of BMI nursing staff to raise known risk factors with consultants ”

    Source location

    Sally Ann Tooze Froggatt · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report
  10. Exeter and Greater Devon

    AI-generated summary

    Robert Alan JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Robert Alan JONES suffered multiple falls following a stroke and later deteriorated, dying at South Molton Community Hospital on 1 April 2014. The inquest recorded accidental death, with acute on chronic subdural haematoma and multiple falls due to cerebrovascular accidents. Concerns included inadequate communication about the total number of falls, use of an out-of-date post-falls checklist, and incomplete or incorrectly recorded neurological observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to communicate the patient's total number of falls to all visiting staff

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) There was no evidence of communication to ensure that all staff including the different GPs visiting, were aware of the total number of falls the patient has sustained. An out of date post falls checklist was used which does not include specific details of the frequency in duration of neurological observations as recommended by NICE, where head injury has occurred and can or cannot be ruled out and the patient did not always have his neurological observations recorded as per the minimum recommended. They were not always recorded correctly on the observation charts. ”

    Source location

    Robert Alan JONES · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Revise and publish the falls policy and post-falls checklist to specify NICE-based neurological observation frequency and duration after suspected or confirmed head injury.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “(1) Revise the Trust’s falls policy to include the recommended frequency and duration of neurological observations based on NICE guidance for patients where head injury has occurred or cannot be ruled out, and inclusion of relevant history of falls in handovers of care.”

    Source location

    2015-0018-Response-by-Northern-Devon-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require falls risk and falls information in bedside handovers and safety briefings, with observational audits, feedback, and re-audit of information-sharing gaps.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust’s falls policy (enclosed) has been revised to include information relating to the frequency and duration of neurological observations (in line with the relevant NICE guidelines) and published on the Trust’s policy website. The Trust’s policy includes a post falls checklist (enclosed) which details how often and for how long neurological observations should be recorded. The Trust’s bedside handover and safety briefing standard operating procedure clearly identifies information relating to patient falls (including their risk of falls) is a key component in shift to shift communication, and must be included in handover. Bedside handovers are audited via observation and reports and actions provided to wards and teams where there are gaps in information being shared. Improvement is measured by re-audit.”

    Source location

    2015-0018-Response-by-Northern-Devon-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement filing of post-falls checklists with physiological and neurological observation charts for daily multidisciplinary team review of patients’ multiple falls.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As per (1), this information is included in safety briefings, which are multi-disciplinary events. Additionally, the Trust’s post falls checklist allows staff to record multiple falls on the same document, ensuring that information relating to falls is held in a central place. The trust is implementing a system that requires the post falls checklist to be filed with the patient’s physiological observations / neurological observations chart, which is reviewed by the Multi Disciplinary Team on a daily basis.”

    Source location

    2015-0018-Response-by-Northern-Devon-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Issue and disseminate a Trust-wide Patient Safety Alert covering neurological observations, post-falls checklist completion and filing, and inclusion of falls information in briefings and handovers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To support the actions detailed above, the Trust will issue a Patient Safety Alert, which will communicate the need for neurological observations when a head injury has occurred or cannot be ruled out, completion of the post falls checklist, to include the frequency and duration of observations, to ensure the post falls checklist is filed with the patient’s observation chart for ease of access for all Multi-Disciplinary Team members, and to ensure that information relating to falls risk or actual falls is included in safety briefings and bedside handover. Patient Safety Alerts are disseminated across the whole Trust to clinical and managerial leads.”

    Source location

    2015-0018-Response-by-Northern-Devon-Healthcare-NHS-Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The recommended safety actions are primarily the responsibility of the hospital trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The recommended actions are primarily the responsibility of the hospital trust: I enclose a copy of their Action Plan which I have just received from ████████, Matron of South Molton Community Hospital and which I believe satisfactorily addresses all your concerns and recommended actions.”

    Source location

    2015-0068-Response-by-The-Health-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The hospital trust’s action plan is considered to satisfactorily address all concerns and recommended actions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The recommended actions are primarily the responsibility of the hospital trust: I enclose a copy of their Action Plan which I have just received from ████████, Matron of South Molton Community Hospital and which I believe satisfactorily addresses all your concerns and recommended actions.”

    Source location

    2015-0068-Response-by-The-Health-Centre
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 January 2015

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026