Recurring concern

Unreliable emergency response arrangements in care homes

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 15 Feb 2016•Latest report 31 Oct 2025

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes care-home arrangements for recognising emergencies, seeking medical or emergency assistance, activating emergency calls, allocating responsibilities, using emergency procedures and coordinating the immediate response, including the anchor's inadequate training of non-clinical staff and failures to provide defined emergency procedures.

Not included

  • Excludes generic care-home staffing, training or communication deficiencies unless they directly impair the care home's emergency-response arrangement.
  • Excludes failures limited to ambulance dispatch, attendance, hospital handover or treatment after the emergency response has been appropriately initiated.
  • Excludes routine clinical care, welfare checks or resident supervision where no care-home emergency-response deficiency is identified.
  • Excludes generic first-aid or resuscitation competence concerns unless they are part of the wider care-home emergency-response arrangement.
  • Excludes the narrower concern concerning care staff's ability to initiate an appropriate 999 or 111 call when that is the only supported failure.
Reports
17

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
19

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2016–2025

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
26

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Care Quality Commission3
Wolverhampton City Council2
Avery Healthcare Group1
Barchester Healthcare Limited1
Broadland View Care Home1
Castlehill Specialist Care Centre1
Community Disability Nurse1
Dairy Lane Care Centre1
Hampshire County Council1
Health and Safety Executive1
Healthcare Management Solutions Ltd1
Hibiscus House Domiciliary Care Agency1
Hibiscus Housing Association Limited1
Hill Care Group1
Independent Futures1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. Liverpool and the Wirral

    AI-generated summary

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Gloria Simon moved into a care home for respite care and died there from natural causes on 20 September 2025 after her health deteriorated. Concerns included missed opportunities for timely clinical assistance, a GP misunderstanding the care home setting and oxygen saturation reading, and possible insufficient training of non-clinical staff in seeking help and taking and responding to basic observations.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to obtain timely alternative clinical input when the registered GP is unavailable

    Wider context from the report

    “2. On 17 September 2025 the staff at the care home were sufficiently concerned about the Gloria Simon’s health that they sought assistance from her registered GP, who declined to visit because she was no longer within their area. Whilst efforts were made to register her with a practice local to the care home, staff did not make any alternative arrangements for obtaining clinical input in the meantime. The court heard that staff should have called 111. Depending upon the seriousness of their concerns, another possibility would have been to call 999. In fact, no further attempt was made to seek help until 14:52 on 19 September 2025. The court is concerned that the training of non-clinical staff was insufficient to equip them with knowledge about how to manage a situation such as this effectively and would like to know what measures are being taken to address this. ”

    Source location

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Insufficient training of non-clinical staff in responding to urgent health concerns

    Wider context from the report

    “2. On 17 September 2025 the staff at the care home were sufficiently concerned about the Gloria Simon’s health that they sought assistance from her registered GP, who declined to visit because she was no longer within their area. Whilst efforts were made to register her with a practice local to the care home, staff did not make any alternative arrangements for obtaining clinical input in the meantime. The court heard that staff should have called 111. Depending upon the seriousness of their concerns, another possibility would have been to call 999. In fact, no further attempt was made to seek help until 14:52 on 19 September 2025. The court is concerned that the training of non-clinical staff was insufficient to equip them with knowledge about how to manage a situation such as this effectively and would like to know what measures are being taken to address this. ”

    Source location

    Gloria SIMON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Supervise senior care assistants on obtaining clinical support, including contacting 111 or 999 when residents are unwell and a GP is unavailable.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Supervision of all senior care assistants has been completed by the Registered Manager which includes instruction that when a resident is unwell and a GP cannot be accessed every attempt to obtain clinical support will be made. This would include contacting 111 or in fact 999 following observations.”

    Source location

    Response from Riversdale Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Arrange local GP registration within 24 hours for new out-of-district residents and obtain 111 advice if they become unwell before registration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Companies’ policy has been revised and all new residents who are out of district with their own GP will have arrangements made within the first 24 hours to be registered with a local GP. This process is in place for both respite and permanent placement. Due to registration taking 48 hours, if a resident becomes unwell then team are to source advice from 111.”

    Source location

    Response from Riversdale Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 5 November 2025

    Open published response
  2. Northumberland

    AI-generated summary

    Joan WHITWORTH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joan Whitworth, a resident of Oaks Care Home with advanced dementia and a DNACPR order, died there on 3 March 2023 after choking caused by massive aspiration. Concerns included the adequacy of the speech and language assessment, staff training and induction, delayed intervention when she showed signs of choking, and food being prepared contrary to her diet plan.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in care assistant intervention when a resident shows signs of choking

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Agency staff - induction I am concerned that an agency member of staff remained in the dining room and was last seen standing next to the alarm bell cord. The care assistant did not intervene immediately when the deceased showed signs of choking and instead sought help. I am further concerned that it could not be confirmed if the agency staff had undergone an induction. ”

    Source location

    Joan WHITWORTH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reissue Basic Life Support and IDDSI/Dysphagia training electronically with defined completion timeframes.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1d. We have reissued Basic Life Support and IDDSI/Dysphagia training to all staff on the electronic system and have allocated a specific timeframe in which this training is to be completed. All staff will have completed face to face emergency first aid training by 14th October 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver face-to-face emergency first aid training to all staff by 14 October 2025.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1d. We have reissued Basic Life Support and IDDSI/Dysphagia training to all staff on the electronic system and have allocated a specific timeframe in which this training is to be completed. All staff will have completed face to face emergency first aid training by 14th October 2025.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The measures described are considered sufficient to satisfy the concerns, so no further safety work is proposed.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We trust that these measures are sufficient to satisfy your concerns.”

    Source location

    Response from Hill Care Group
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 July 2025

    Open published response
  3. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Ian George Stanton SIMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ian Simpson fell in August 2024, sustained a traumatic spinal injury, and later required a long-term catheter. He was found unresponsive at Magnolia Court Care Home on 16 December 2024, was taken to hospital after a delay in calling an ambulance, and died that evening from sepsis secondary to a urine infection. The principal concerns were the delay in calling an ambulance and inadequate and inaccurate care-home record-keeping, including retrospective or misleading entries.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in calling an emergency ambulance for very unwell residents

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Mr Simpson was found unresponsive by care home staff at about 09:30 on 16 December 2024, and an emergency ambulance was not called until 10:19. On the evidence in this particular case, that delay did not more than minimally contribute to death; however, it would or should have been obvious to staff that the resident was very unwell and required an ambulance as soon as possible. This raises the concern that such a delay, if repeated, places others at serious risk. My concern was compounded by the evidence from the manager (which I did not wholly accept) that it would be reasonable to take this period of time for a nurse to be alerted, assess the resident, and decide whether an ambulance was required. ”

    Source location

    Ian George Stanton SIMPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Present learning from the matter to home managers, including escalation expectations and immediate 999 calls for newly unresponsive residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• I presented learning from this matter to all our home managers during our ‘Leading the way’ internal communication webinar on 19th May 2025. This session covered responsibility to escalate any concerns in relation to residents’ health and welfare and utilise the guidance provided in our Deteriorating Resident’s Policy and that 999 must be immediately called for an unresponsive resident where this represents a new presentation.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete themed supervisions covering RESTORE2 clinical judgement and managing resident deterioration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Themed supervisions have been completed with the support of Divisional Clinical Lead Nurse, the Clinical Development Nurse and both the Regional Director and General Manager of the Home. These themed supervisions cover two main areas:”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 3 · response
    Published 21 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide staff with Clinical Shots guidance for assessing residents and responding to deterioration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Staff in the Home have also been provided with Barchester ‘Clinical Shots’ guidance, to inform their assessment of residents and the steps to be taken in response.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 4 · response
    Published 21 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The reported 09:30 incident time is unsupported; staff identified no concerns about the resident’s health or wellbeing then.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• it is not clear where the time of 09:30am as the time of the incident originates. Whilst this is recorded in the Accident and Incident Form, no member of staff suggested that there were any concerns at this time in respect of Mr Simpson’s health and wellbeing.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 1 · response
    Published 21 May 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Staff did not consider a 49-minute escalation period appropriate for an unresponsive resident and recalled no significant delay in this case.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Despite the evidence given, no other member of the Nursing team considered that 49 minutes is an appropriate length of time to escalate concerns to 999 if a resident is found unresponsive and staff did not recall there being any significant delay in doing so in Mr Simpson’s case.”

    Source location

    Response from Barchester Healthcare Ltd
    Page 2 · response
    Published 21 May 2025

    Open published response
  4. Inner North London

    AI-generated summary

    Ivy May DIXON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ivy Dixon choked on food while being fed by staff at Acorn Lodge Care Home on 6 October 2024, causing cardiac arrest. Staff did not perform CPR, and concerns were raised about inaccurate communication to paramedics, staff integrity, and possible training or clinical skills gaps in emergency care.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of healthcare assistant and nursing staff training and clinical skills or knowledge for emergency care

    Wider context from the report

    “2. While the patient was breathing and conscious at the time of the 999 call, when LAS staff attended six minutes later, the patient was not conscious, not breathing, had no palpable pulse, and was critically unwell in confirmed cardiac arrest. However, despite this, staff from the Care Home were not undertaking CPR. The DNACPR would not have applied in this case, because choking is a potentially reversible cause of cardiac arrest, which the Care Home’s manager confirmed in her evidence. This raises the concern that staff (healthcare assistants and nursing staff) at the Care Home may have previously unidentified training needs and/or lacked the clinical skills/knowledge to provide emergency care. ”

    Source location

    Ivy May DIXON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue providing nursing and care staff with up-to-date CPR and emergency-situation training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “With regards to the training, skills and competence of our staff, our nurses undertake CPR training every 12 months and the staff on duty on that day were up to date with their training. However, given the tight time line of events, there had only been 6 minutes between the 999 call being made and the attendance of the LAS. As previously mentioned, our staff are of the belief that at the time of arrival of LAS, Mrs Dixon was still alive but deteriorating and care was taken over by the LAS at 18.21 hrs, only 6 minutes after the 999 call being made.”

    Source location

    Response from Lukka Care Homes Limited
    Page 5 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Purchase Lifevac devices and train relevant staff in their use, alongside providing choking-response sessions.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “improving training with our staff and providing the tools to do so.”

    Source location

    Response from Lukka Care Homes Limited
    Page 6 · response
    Published 17 April 2025

    Open published response
  5. Buckinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Sheila Ann Nicholls · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sheila Ann Nicholls died after choking on food during respite care at Mandeville Grange Nursing Home on 19 November 2023. Her family had warned the nursing home about her swallowing difficulties, but important information was not recorded or shared, and she was given food that was unsuitable or insufficiently prepared. The report raised concerns about policy management, emergency response training, and the investigation and learning from adverse incidents.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to maintain emergency-response training through drills and expiry awareness

    Wider context from the report

    “2. At the time of Sheila’s death, of the several staff members that responded to her choking emergency, only one staff member (nurse GC) had currently valid training in life support, but still undertook CPR ineffectively without being corrected by other staff. Evidence was also given that no simulated emergency drills were ever performed, and some staff were never aware their training had expired. Whilst nurse GC still works for Grange Mandeville Nursing Home, it is unclear how that nurse will be supported in their ability to provide an adequate emergency response, bearing in mind their existing training appears to have been insufficient. The deficiency in training and embedding that training, both generally for all staff, and for that specific nurse, creates a risk of death to residents should future emergencies arise. ”

    Source location

    Sheila Ann Nicholls · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver emergency-response training through eLearning, recorded face-to-face sessions, expiry reminders, a maintained training matrix and weekly compliance review.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Effective from 14 October 2024, we transitioned the majority of our training to an eLearning format provided by The Access Group (Access Learning for Care). This platform automatically generates a training matrix for Mandeville Grange and also records any face-to-face sessions, ensuring the matrix remains accurate and up to date.”

    Source location

    Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Finalise the process document governing emergency CPR drills.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have not carried out any emergency CPR drills to date as we have been trying to work through a process document to ensure that what we put in place is fit for purpose. The document is now finalised however the starting of drills is awaiting assessment of staff competency who will deliver the training. This will happen within 1 month.”

    Source location

    Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Assess the competency of staff who will deliver emergency CPR training within one month.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have not carried out any emergency CPR drills to date as we have been trying to work through a process document to ensure that what we put in place is fit for purpose. The document is now finalised however the starting of drills is awaiting assessment of staff competency who will deliver the training. This will happen within 1 month.”

    Source location

    Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Obtain a PractiMan adult/child CPR training manikin for the home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have ordered a PractiMan Advanced CPR Adult/Child Manikin, 2-in-1 Life-like CPR Training Manikin for Adult/Child CPR Training for the home.”

    Source location

    Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Emergency CPR drills have not started because trainer competency assessment is pending; drills are expected to begin within one month.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We have not carried out any emergency CPR drills to date as we have been trying to work through a process document to ensure that what we put in place is fit for purpose. The document is now finalised however the starting of drills is awaiting assessment of staff competency who will deliver the training. This will happen within 1 month.”

    Source location

    Response from Mandeville Grange Nursing Home
    Page 3 · response
    Published 13 January 2025

    Open published response
  6. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Sylvia Prichard · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sylvia Prichard, a resident of Moorlands Lodge Care Home, had an unwitnessed fall on 28 March 2024 after a delayed response to her call bell and later died in hospital from a traumatic acute subdural haemorrhage. The concerns included the absence of a falls minimisation plan, outdated and conflicting care-plan information, persistent delays in responding to call bells, and inadequate oversight and auditing of these issues.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide wearable emergency alert devices to residents not assessed as high risk of falls

    Wider context from the report

    “- Since Mrs Prichard’s death Moorlands Lodge Care Home has introduced watches which can be worn on the wrist and used to attract immediate attention in the event of a fall or other medical emergency. However, the watches have only been provided to residents who have been assessed as high risk of falls, meaning that others who have a fall, or another type of medical emergency, are still reliant on the pendant call button to gain assistance. ”

    Source location

    Sylvia Prichard · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Reconfigure the call-bell system to escalate unanswered calls after three minutes to an emergency tone.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Furthermore, there has now been a full review and reconfiguration of the call bell system. This work will ensure that any call bell activated from any source, i.e. pendant or call point will ring for 3 minutes on the ordinary tone. If the call bell is not answered within 3 minutes, the call bell will be automatically escalated and change to an emergency call bell which has a different tone. The team are aware that emergency bells must be answered immediately, and this response is a whole home approach. This new system has made the use of the wrist-worn emergency watches unnecessary.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The reconfigured call bell system makes wrist-worn emergency watches unnecessary for high-risk residents.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• As of November 2024, wrist-worn emergency watches for high-risk residents have been discontinued.”

    Source location

    Response from Avery Healthcare Group
    Page 4 · response
    Published 31 October 2024

    Open published response
  7. Coventry

    AI-generated summary

    Ronald James JEPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ronald James Jepson, who resided at a mental healthcare facility and had a known risk of choking, suffered an unwitnessed choking episode after being provided with supper and died in hospital on 15 March 2023. Concerns included delayed and suboptimal CPR, staff calling 111 rather than 999, and infrequent and ineffectual emergency training for care home staff.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide sufficiently frequent and effective emergency response training for care home staff

    Wider context from the report

    “i. Timely and commensurate interventions of care staff can have a significant positive bearing upon the outcome of a choking episode. Training on how to deal with emergency situations is not ingrained in care home staff. ii. The circumstances of this inquest touching upon the death of Ronald JEPSON accentuated this point. The evidence was that Mr Jepson 'gargling' and becoming unresponsive was an emergency. 111 (a non-emergency number) was called by care home staff and not 999. iii. A call handler recognising it was an emergency escalated matters and guidance was given to care staff as to CPR. First attempts as resuscitation by care staff were following an appreciable period of time (ascribed to inexperience and panic) and the cardiopulmonary resuscitation was sub optimal. iv. The removal of the food occluding the airway of Mr Jepson and effective CPR was provided by paramedics immediately lead a reduced cyanosis. v. A choking episode, of itself, is a time critical event. vi. Such training at the time of the incident was ineffectual and infrequent (online) with the consequence being that when an emergency arose the actions of staff to aid a resident were cumulatively sub optimal. vii. Following the incident there has been no significant increase in training frequency such as would better enable commensurate training to be ingrained in staff which may make significant difference in averting an adverse outcome for a resident in need of emergency care/ assistance. ”

    Source location

    Ronald James JEPSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide face-to-face basic life-support and Level 1 first-aid training covering choking recognition, immediate response and escalation; training has reached 82% of staff.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “ii) At the time of Mr. Ronald James Jepson, staff at Meadow House had all completed e-learning 1st aid training. To ensure staff team are further prepared to deal with medical emergencies that might arise during support and care delivery, Provider sourced Face-to-Face Basic Life Support Training for staff, for which 82% of the staff attended. Since the incident, the Provider has sourced and supplied Level 1 1st Aid. The training encompassed a practical session for various emergencies that might arise in the service including recognizing when a resident is choking, immediate actions to take and escalation.”

    Source location

    Response from Meadow House
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Give the two staff members without face-to-face training choking-response guidance and e-learning training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iii) Remedial measures have been implemented for when the 2 members of staff are on duty that haven’t had their face-to-face training; they have received step by step guide for dealing with a choking service user from the registered manager as well as having completed their e-learning.”

    Source location

    Response from Meadow House
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver a face-to-face three-day Level 3 first-aid qualification to all service shift leaders.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iv) Advanced Life Support Training for all Senior Care and Support Workers in the Services. To ensure a high level of skill set in dealing with medical emergencies in the service, the Provider has taken further steps by sourcing face to face 3-day course, Level 3 Award in First Aid at Work (RQF). The training is aimed at all Shift Leaders in the Service and is due to be delivered from the 15th May 2024 to the 18th May 2024”

    Source location

    Response from Meadow House
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Introduce tabletop emergency exercises alongside face-to-face training and continuing e-learning.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “iii) From the face-to-face training provided and the desk top exercises now in place, the provider is assured that should a similar incident occur staff will act accordingly without panic and in a timely manner.”

    Source location

    Response from Meadow House
    Page 2 · response
    Published 29 April 2024

    Open published response
  8. Norfolk

    AI-generated summary

    Eileen Marguerite WALSH · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eileen Marguerite WALSH, who had dementia and general frailty, fell unwitnessed at Broadland View Care Home, sustained a fractured neck of femur, and died on 3 March 2020. The inquest found that required hourly checks were not completed, her bed was not lowered, and the PIR sensor and pressure mat alarms did not sound; her death was contributed to by neglect. Concerns included incomplete night-working and monitoring arrangements, unreliable or editable care records, unclear policies on sleeping during night shifts, alarms that could not be heard everywhere, and failures to identify and learn from care and safeguarding concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of warning alarms to support immediate response throughout the care home

    Wider context from the report

    “6. The warning alarms requiring immediate response cannot be heard in all places at the Care Home. It is understood walkie-talkies have been introduced for use by all staff but this adds in another step to be taken by staff before the alarm is responded to. ”

    Source location

    Eileen Marguerite WALSH · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Use walkie-talkies to coordinate night staff movements and communication throughout the building.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “- Daily notes audit: to monitor and audit night observations - Walkie Talkies: to enhance communication between staff and work in every area of the building Further actions taken: - additions made to ensure that staff limit the time in laundry/medication room - Daily audit of handover, this includes call mats. - 2nd line sampling of daily notes audit by the Care Manager - If there is a discrepancy in the night checks, staff are required to explain why and complete an incident form around this. - Interim monitor system put into Laundry and Meds room so that alarms can be heard. - Alarms tested to ensure that they can be heard from all rooms.”

    Source location

    Response from Broadland View Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install and operate a monitoring system linking room-entry records, sensor mats, audible alarms and response-time reporting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “V. New monitoring system: This is part of our continuous improvement plans. The Medication system means that accurate recording of room checks, and response times will all be documented, and a detailed report can be obtained. There are sounders in all locations within the home ensuring that all staff can always hear the emergency alarms during their shift.”

    Source location

    Response from Broadland View Care Home
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 August 2023

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Add sounders near Rooms 1 and 2 and test alarms to ensure emergency signals can be heard across the home.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “XII. The new alarm system has been installed, and the Night Working Policy has been updated to include this.”

    Source location

    Response from Broadland View Care Home
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 August 2023

    Open published response
  9. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Charles Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Charles Evans, a resident at Hibiscus House, choked on food in the communal dining room on 29 May 2022, suffered cardiac arrest and severe hypoxic brain injury, and died in hospital the following day. The concerns included inadequate CPR and first-aid provision, absence of a defibrillator and emergency communication arrangements, insufficient staffing and emergency procedures in the dining room, and weaknesses in risk assessment and reporting processes.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of an emergency response procedure

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest I heard evidence from Faye Cadogan Registered Manager Hibiscus House and Norma Chambers Catering Assistant at Hibiscus House. 1. None of the Carers employed at Hibiscus House had any training in CPR. The carer on duty was qualified to Level 2 Diploma in Health & Social care which does not include any training in first aid; 2. At the time of the incident there were no staff members trained in CPR (Coroner was told this had been rectified post Mr Evans death); 3. There was no Registered First Aider at the premises; 4. There was no defibrillator on site; 5. There was no requirement for any staff to be on duty in the communal dining room during mealtimes despite the fact the Hibiscus House could cater for residents with special dietary requirements; 6. There was no emergency bell/alarm or telephone in the residents’ dining room. Staff were expected to use their mobile phone to call for help; 7. There was no procedure for what should happen in an emergency situation (in this instance the catering staff member who found Mr Evans located a carer instead of calling 999 themselves; 8. Staff did not know who else was on duty at any given time; 9. There was no proper procedure in place for staff to report concerns about residents; 10. No further risk assessments were being conducted if a resident returned to Hibiscus House after a hospital admission to ensure the facility could still meet the needs of the resident (Coroner was told staff relied on a discharge summary and/or the GP); 11. Post inquest, the Coroner noted the CQC Inspection report for Hibiscus House Domiciliary Care Agency dated July 2019 which rated the facility as ‘requiring improvement’. The Coroner is concerned to establish whether the service provider put forward an action plan following the CQC Inspection setting out what they would do to improve the standards of quality and safety and whether the CQC monitored any progress towards said plan. ”

    Source location

    Charles Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of reliable emergency communication facilities in the residents’ dining room

    Wider context from the report

    “During the course of the inquest I heard evidence from Faye Cadogan Registered Manager Hibiscus House and Norma Chambers Catering Assistant at Hibiscus House. 1. None of the Carers employed at Hibiscus House had any training in CPR. The carer on duty was qualified to Level 2 Diploma in Health & Social care which does not include any training in first aid; 2. At the time of the incident there were no staff members trained in CPR (Coroner was told this had been rectified post Mr Evans death); 3. There was no Registered First Aider at the premises; 4. There was no defibrillator on site; 5. There was no requirement for any staff to be on duty in the communal dining room during mealtimes despite the fact the Hibiscus House could cater for residents with special dietary requirements; 6. There was no emergency bell/alarm or telephone in the residents’ dining room. Staff were expected to use their mobile phone to call for help; 7. There was no procedure for what should happen in an emergency situation (in this instance the catering staff member who found Mr Evans located a carer instead of calling 999 themselves; 8. Staff did not know who else was on duty at any given time; 9. There was no proper procedure in place for staff to report concerns about residents; 10. No further risk assessments were being conducted if a resident returned to Hibiscus House after a hospital admission to ensure the facility could still meet the needs of the resident (Coroner was told staff relied on a discharge summary and/or the GP); 11. Post inquest, the Coroner noted the CQC Inspection report for Hibiscus House Domiciliary Care Agency dated July 2019 which rated the facility as ‘requiring improvement’. The Coroner is concerned to establish whether the service provider put forward an action plan following the CQC Inspection setting out what they would do to improve the standards of quality and safety and whether the CQC monitored any progress towards said plan. ”

    Source location

    Charles Evans · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a written emergency procedure, embed it in risk assessments and the improvement plan, and train staff on it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Since this tragic incident Hibiscus have, with the assistance of their consultants, Delphi, and in conjunction with the CQC, implemented a formal procedure and provided training to its staff on the steps to take in an emergency situation. This procedure is now in written form reflected in risk assessments and forms part of Hibiscus’ new improvement plan. This is attached.”

    Source location

    Response from Hibiscus House
    Page 4 · response
    Published 4 November 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The CQC is not responsible for regulating the quality of Hibiscus House’s accommodation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “1. Hibiscus House is registered with CQC as a Domiciliary Care Agency (“DCA”) under the location name Hibiscus Domiciliary Care Agency and is operated by Hibiscus Housing Association Ltd to provide the regulated activity of ‘personal care’. Hibiscus DCA provides personal care and support to people who have learning disabilities, physical and mental health needs living in their own homes. Not everyone who uses DCA services receive the regulated activity of personal care. The CQC is not responsible for regulating the quality of the accommodation.”

    Source location

    Response from Care Quality Commission
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 November 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The concern that no emergency alarm was available in the dining room is disputed because a functioning Care Link pull cord was installed there.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “6. There was no emergency bell/alarm or telephone in the residents dining room. Staff were expected to use their mobile phone to call for help.”

    Source location

    Response from Hibiscus House
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 November 2022

    Open published response
  10. Black Country

    AI-generated summary

    Eric Harold Bird · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Eric Harold Bird, a 91-year-old man with dementia and assessed as being at high risk of falls, suffered seven falls during a four-week period in a specialist care centre. After a fall on 21/11/20, he sustained a subdural haematoma and died in hospital on 30/11/20. The principal concerns included failures to follow procedures after head injuries, delays in contacting emergency services and gaining ambulance access, and inadequate updating and review of his falls risk documentation and care plan.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to provide timely out-of-hours access to the care home for ambulances

    Wider context from the report

    “5. On arrival the ambulance was unable to gain access to the care home until 22.11 as there was no answer at the door. I heard evidence at the inquest that arrangements had now been made for a staff member to wait in the reception area when an ambulance is now called out of hours to facilitate entry; ”

    Source location

    Eric Harold Bird · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Install corridor monitoring screens linked to the external doorbell with audible alerts to improve timely building access.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In order to aid timely access to the building we have fitted several new monitoring screens throughout the corridors linked to the external door bell with an audible alert.”

    Source location

    2021-0122-Response-from-Castlehill-Specialist-Care-Centre-Redacted
    Page 1 · response
    Published 4 May 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    CQC will not progress a criminal investigation because the evidence does not meet the required threshold of proving avoidability beyond reasonable doubt.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• As a result of these findings, CQC held a management review meeting on 18 March 2021 to discuss the findings under our specific incident guidance. In order to open a formal criminal investigation, we have to be able to evidence a Registered Person (either a Registered Provider or Registered Manager) failed to provide safe care and treatment to Mr Bird in relation to this incident and can prove beyond reasonable doubt this incident was avoidable. We did not feel that this threshold was met and therefore will not progress the case.”

    Source location

    2021-0122-Response-from-Care-Quality-Commission-Redacted
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 May 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026