Recurring concern

Failure to reliably recognise and respond promptly to sepsis

Pin Get email alerts Request correction

First reported 29 Apr 2014•Latest report 27 Feb 2026

Definition

What this concern includes

Includes deficiencies in sepsis-related recognition and response across the care process, including dedicated training, awareness, screening tools, clinical assessment, escalation, diagnosis, treatment and monitoring where the report explicitly links the failure to sepsis.

Not included

  • Excludes generic training, staffing, documentation, communication or governance deficiencies not explicitly tied to sepsis recognition or response.
  • Excludes concerns about other named hazards or conditions, such as head injury, falls, pressure ulcers or medication safety, unless the report explicitly identifies sepsis recognition or response as the unsafe issue.
  • Excludes factual statements about sepsis risk that do not identify an unsafe deficiency or unreliable control.
Reports
52

Distinct published reports

Individual concerns
75

A report can raise multiple concerns

Date range
2014–2026

First to latest report issue date

Stated actions
103

Described in published responses

Reports over time

Reports over time

Reports about this concern issued each year.

* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.

Most frequent recipients

Most frequent recipients

Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.

Department of Health and Social Care14
NHS England8
Care Quality Commission7
Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust3
Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust3
Cardiff & Vale University LHB2
Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust2
Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency2
NHS Greater Manchester Integrated Care Board2
Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust2
Abbott Laboratories Limited1
Atrumed Ltd1
Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1
Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services1
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust1

Concerns and responses across reports

Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.

  1. South Wales Central

    AI-generated summary

    Yvonne Rankin · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Yvonne Rankin, aged 68, died at the University Hospital of Wales on 14 January 2021 after an infection at her PEG site returned and she quickly developed sepsis, despite extensive medical treatment. The concerns were that Yvonne and her family did not understand the specific signs of sepsis, which may have delayed calling 999, and whether sepsis information cards could be provided to patients and carers with PEGs or those at known risk of infection in the community.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to ensure that patients and carers understand the specific signs of sepsis

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) although family and Yvonne were told that they could refer any concerns to various professionals including the Abbott nurse, they did not understand the specific signs of sepsis to watch out for; (2) had family understood the signs of sepsis, it is likely that they would have rung 999 much sooner; and (3) It may be that patient/carer information cards setting out the common signs of sepsis already exists. Would it be possible to give out such information cards to patients/carers with PEGs and/or those who are at known risk of infection who are in the community? ”

    Source location

    Yvonne Rankin · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 1 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Ensure new patients seen by the ANA team receive updated sepsis-sign information, supplying the literature when patients do not have it.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For clarity, the Abbott Nurse Advisor team is employed by CHASE and, on behalf of Abbott Laboratories Limited (Abbott), their role is to fulfil an enteral feeding nursing service, as part of an NHS Contract Specification. Abbott currently holds an enteral feeding contract with Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (Cardiff and Vale UHB).”

    Source location

    Response from Abbott Nutrition
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Carry and share Adult and Paediatric Symptom Cards with patients showing infection signs and their relevant family members or carers.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For clarity, the Abbott Nurse Advisor team is employed by CHASE and, on behalf of Abbott Laboratories Limited (Abbott), their role is to fulfil an enteral feeding nursing service, as part of an NHS Contract Specification. Abbott currently holds an enteral feeding contract with Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (Cardiff and Vale UHB).”

    Source location

    Response from Abbott Nutrition
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update PEG patient and family information to include sepsis signs and symptoms, and provide it to new patients.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The eCORFLO booklet (Information for patients, relatives and carers, Gastrostomy feeding tube, Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) the patient is given at time of the procedure has been updated to reference to sepsis (attached as Appendix One).”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Consider suitable generic sepsis information for use at the procedure and later in the community, including a credit-card-sized symptom card.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition, we are considering suitable generic information to be given both at time of procedure and later in the community we are considering the SEPSIS awareness credit card size information. This will then be able to be used across wider areas, it gives simple clear information and is a highly visible card. We care for approximately 450 enterally fed patients within the UHB (not all with gastrostomies) so dietetics would purchase these so they could be issued at initial discharge as well as in the community when needed.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide sepsis symptom cards to children and their parents to promote awareness of childhood sepsis signs and symptoms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “We will in addition ensure a sepsis card is also given to children and their parents. We will use the Paediatric Symptom Cards | The UK Sepsis Trust to promote awareness of the signs and symptoms of children who are developing sepsis. We will commence use of the cards as soon as possible.”

    Source location

    Response from Cardiff and Vale University Health Board
    Page 2 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Patient information may only be issued when authorised by Cardiff and Vale UHB under the existing contract specification.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “For clarity, the Abbott Nurse Advisor team is employed by CHASE and, on behalf of Abbott Laboratories Limited (Abbott), their role is to fulfil an enteral feeding nursing service, as part of an NHS Contract Specification. Abbott currently holds an enteral feeding contract with Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (Cardiff and Vale UHB).”

    Source location

    Response from Abbott Nutrition
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Cardiff and Vale UHB is responsible for updating patient information and purchasing symptom cards addressing sepsis signs.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Abbott and Cardiff and Vale UHB have reviewed how the requirements of the Regulation 28 Report can be met and the following has been agreed between the parties on 3 February 2023:”

    Source location

    Response from Abbott Nutrition
    Page 1 · response
    Published 19 December 2022

    Open published response
  2. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Philip Geoffrey Day · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Philip Geoffrey Day was treated with methotrexate for psoriatic arthritis and developed neutropenic sepsis after blood tests showed neutropenia and a raised CRP. He died in hospital on 15 April 2022 after developing ileitis and colitis, followed by cardiac arrest and multi-organ failure. Concerns included delays in triage, medical review and treatment; inadequate communication of information from community clinicians to hospital staff; and insufficient recognition of neutropenic sepsis risk factors and red flags.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of awareness of neutropenic sepsis guidance and red flags

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The Inquest heard that Mr Day’s first EWS score in ED was 2. He did not trigger on EWS for sepsis. However the blood tests in the community had shown a very low neutrophil level and a rising CRP. Had those factors been recognised along with his immunosuppression then he would have been treated under the neutropenic sepsis pathway earlier. The evidence suggested that there is a lack of awareness of the guidance and red flags for neutropenic sepsis which delays treatment. Greater awareness and triage questions that prompt for neutropenic sepsis would reduce the risk of neutropenic sepsis symptoms being missed at triage. ”

    Source location

    Philip Geoffrey Day · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of triage to prompt for neutropenic sepsis

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The Inquest heard that Mr Day’s first EWS score in ED was 2. He did not trigger on EWS for sepsis. However the blood tests in the community had shown a very low neutrophil level and a rising CRP. Had those factors been recognised along with his immunosuppression then he would have been treated under the neutropenic sepsis pathway earlier. The evidence suggested that there is a lack of awareness of the guidance and red flags for neutropenic sepsis which delays treatment. Greater awareness and triage questions that prompt for neutropenic sepsis would reduce the risk of neutropenic sepsis symptoms being missed at triage. ”

    Source location

    Philip Geoffrey Day · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report
  3. Manchester City

    AI-generated summary

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    A 78-year-old woman developed severe sepsis and necrotising fasciitis following dental treatment. She was not triaged or assessed promptly at hospital, suffered a cardiac arrest, underwent emergency surgery, and died on 6 July 2019. The concerns included the currency and implementation of sepsis protocols, staff training and awareness, and timely recognition and treatment of sepsis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to appropriately recognise sepsis

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Periodic audits are undertaken to ensure appropriate recognition of sepsis has been made and appropriate treatment commenced in a timely manner. ”

    Source location

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of new, locum and agency staff to act in accordance with sepsis protocols and policies

    Wider context from the report

    “3. That new or locum clinicians as well as agency nursing staff are made aware of the sepsis policies and protocols and act in accordance with them. ”

    Source location

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Delays in commencing appropriate sepsis treatment

    Wider context from the report

    “4. Periodic audits are undertaken to ensure appropriate recognition of sepsis has been made and appropriate treatment commenced in a timely manner. ”

    Source location

    Name not published · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement HIVE with sepsis screening alerts, escalation prompts, Sepsis Six guidance and treatment timing support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In September 2022, MFT implemented a Trust wide electronic patient record (HIVE). The Trust’s Policy has been amended to reflect changes to existing practice and particularly documentation associated with recognising, escalating, and treating patients with sepsis. Sepsis screening flags have also been built into the software to alert staff to patients who ‘trigger’ for sepsis based on their clinical observations.”

    Source location

    Response form Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish an eight-member Acute Care team to deliver sepsis education, quality improvement and monthly compliance review across the Trust.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “MFT has established the Acute Care team which is made up of eight Clinical Acute Care Educators (covering adults, maternity, and paediatrics) whose role is to provide sepsis education, drive sepsis quality improvement work and review the monthly sepsis compliance figures across the Trust. This refers to compliance with sepsis screening as well as the ‘Sepsis Six’ treatment bundle, a set of six key tests and interventions that need to be applied to a patient with red flag sepsis features within 60 minutes of sepsis being suspected. If a specific area/ward is under-performing the team will offer specific targeted sepsis education and review where improvements can be made.”

    Source location

    Response form Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Publish acute-care education guidelines and require relevant clinical, nursing and medical staff to complete sepsis-related induction, mandatory and role-specific training.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All clinical members of staff are required to complete Sepsis Mandatory training. Sepsis training falls within the ‘Acute Care Management’ module. It is mandatory that staff complete this module yearly; medical staff are expected to include confirmation of their mandatory training compliance within their annual appraisal that supports medical revalidation.”

    Source location

    Response form Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 2 · response
    Published 4 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish inpatient sepsis audits and present findings to the Clinical Effectiveness Committee to monitor recognition and timely treatment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2022 an inpatient sepsis audit was established in line with the MFT Acute Care team audits. It has run for two cycles and the findings have been presented to the Clinical Effectiveness Committee. One outcome of the audit was to establish a Sepsis Task and Finish Group to improve sepsis education and awareness across MFT and harness HIVE to access real time meaningful data on sepsis screening compliance.”

    Source location

    Response form Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 4 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Establish a Sepsis Task and Finish Group to improve sepsis education and awareness and use HIVE data to monitor screening compliance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In 2022 an inpatient sepsis audit was established in line with the MFT Acute Care team audits. It has run for two cycles and the findings have been presented to the Clinical Effectiveness Committee. One outcome of the audit was to establish a Sepsis Task and Finish Group to improve sepsis education and awareness across MFT and harness HIVE to access real time meaningful data on sepsis screening compliance.”

    Source location

    Response form Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 4 · response
    Published 4 October 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Provide NHS Professionals, locum and agency staff with induction or local orientation covering HIVE, sepsis policies, procedures and relevant mandatory training before or during shifts.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “All NHS Professionals staff and long-term locum doctors will have a full induction programme and will be required to complete any relevant mandatory training prior to commencing shifts.”

    Source location

    Response form Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
    Page 3 · response
    Published 4 October 2022

    Open published response
  4. Manchester South

    AI-generated summary

    Ernest Bacon · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Ernest Thomas Bacon suffered an accidental fall at home, sustained a fractured neck of femur, and was admitted to Tameside General Hospital, where he subsequently had an ischaemic stroke. After triggering for sepsis on 16 January 2022, he was not reviewed face to face, the sepsis pathway was not followed, intravenous antibiotics were delayed, and the failure to escalate was not recognised. He died from sepsis at the hospital on 17 January 2022.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to flag sepsis concerns in patient notes

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The nursing team recognised that he was triggering for Sepsis but the notes were not flagged and the failure to follow the Sepsis policy was not escalated in accordance with Trust Policy. The reason for non-escalation was unclear. ”

    Source location

    Ernest Bacon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to escalate non-compliance with the sepsis policy

    Wider context from the report

    “4. The nursing team recognised that he was triggering for Sepsis but the notes were not flagged and the failure to follow the Sepsis policy was not escalated in accordance with Trust Policy. The reason for non-escalation was unclear. ”

    Source location

    Ernest Bacon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to place sepsis-triggering patients on the sepsis pathway

    Wider context from the report

    “3. The Trust Policy required he be treated for Sepsis. However he was not placed on the Sepsis pathway and a further review did not take place until a further doctor was asked to examine him at about 22.30 despite his NEWS2 score continuing to trigger for Sepsis; ”

    Source location

    Ernest Bacon · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Conduct monthly internal spot-check audits of sepsis pathway compliance and report non-compliance through incident forms.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “To provide internal assurance spot check audits have been implemented to specifically look at compliance with the sepsis pathway. The audits have commenced and include a review of 10 patients each month. Where compliance with the pathway has not been present, an incident form will be completed contemporaneously.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run a Trust-wide incident-reporting programme addressing incident and near-miss identification, reporting, learning and action.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “In addition to this, there has been a Trust wide focus on incident reporting throughout the month of September 2022. This work has been underway across the organisation and is being led by the Assistant Director of Integrated Governance throughout, culminating in the Trust’s Patient Safety Conference on October 6th 2022. This programme of events and activities seeks to engage staff at all levels and focusses on identification of incidents or near misses, incident reporting, acting on and learning from incidents.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 4 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with AoMRC and NICE to consider how healthcare professionals will be educated and informed about updated national sepsis guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has launched a consultation on updating the NG51 guideline for sepsis, based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ statement. The consultation will run from 7 to 21 December and can be reached on NICE’s website. As updated national sepsis guidance is implemented, the Department along with NHS England will continue to work closely with AoMRC and NICE to consider how healthcare professionals, including nurses and community health workers, will be educated and informed on its use. The Department will also continue to work closely with colleagues in the National Institute for Health and Care Research to understand, where appropriate, evidence and evaluation that can be commissioned to support best practice implementation of new guidance that is complemented by useful educational tools and awareness interventions.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue working with the National Institute for Health and Care Research to understand evidence and evaluation that may support implementation of new sepsis guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Additionally, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has launched a consultation on updating the NG51 guideline for sepsis, based on the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges’ statement. The consultation will run from 7 to 21 December and can be reached on NICE’s website. As updated national sepsis guidance is implemented, the Department along with NHS England will continue to work closely with AoMRC and NICE to consider how healthcare professionals, including nurses and community health workers, will be educated and informed on its use. The Department will also continue to work closely with colleagues in the National Institute for Health and Care Research to understand, where appropriate, evidence and evaluation that can be commissioned to support best practice implementation of new guidance that is complemented by useful educational tools and awareness interventions.”

    Source location

    Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Implement a Trust-wide sepsis improvement programme covering recognition, Sepsis Care Bundle use, antibiotics, blood cultures and deteriorating-patient assessment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Immediately following the inquest touching the death of Mr. Bacon the Trust completed a retrospective root cause analysis investigation into the clinical care of Mr Bacon, and in particular the response to his raised National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and recognition of sepsis. This was also retrospectively reported on the Trust’s incident reporting electronic system. A number of learning points were identified as a result of the investigation and the findings have been used to support a Trust wide sepsis improvement plan.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver sepsis awareness, training and dissemination activities through briefings, scenario sessions, toolbox talks and sharing learning with clinical teams.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Trust has had a Trust wide a focus on World Sepsis Day which was held on the 13th September 2022. The Trust’s Safer Care team have held a focus on sepsis week which took place over the week of 12th -18th September 2022. The objective of the week was to raise the profile of sepsis throughout the organisation and to reiterate recognition and management of suspected sepsis. During the week results of the sepsis audit and a detailed action plan on the sepsis improvement work was shared at the Trust’s Grand Round and the Managing Deteriorating Patient Group. In addition to this, 7-minute briefings on recent sepsis incidents have been developed and are being shared across the Trust. The Safer Care team have also created sepsis related scenarios to engage teams in identifying red flags for sepsis and encourage adherence to the use of sepsis care bundles.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Agree additional nursing posts to support sepsis identification, training and compliance across the organisation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The sepsis improvement work has also been reported to the Trust’s Quality and Governance Committee, which is chaired by a Non-Executive Director. As a direct action following this meeting additional nursing posts were agreed which will specifically support clinical teams in sepsis identification, training and compliance across the organisation.”

    Source location

    Response from Tameside and Glossop Integrated Care
    Page 3 · response
    Published 30 September 2022

    Open published response
  5. Blackpool and the Fylde

    AI-generated summary

    Sarah Louise Dunn · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Sarah Louise Dunn developed Group A Streptococcus sepsis following an early medical abortion and died in hospital on 11 April 2020 after progressing to toxic shock. The report identified failures to recognise and treat sepsis across primary and secondary care, including delays in assessment, use of sepsis pathways and antibiotics. The principal concern was inadequate awareness and training regarding the risk of sepsis following early medical abortion, creating a risk of avoidable future deaths.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to consider and initiate sepsis protocols following Early Medical Abortion

    Wider context from the report

    “(1) Inadequate training of doctors and other medical professionals re the risk of sepsis following Early Medical Terminations. Evidence from a wide range of clinicians who had cared for Sarah in March and April 2020 echoed each other. The clinician evidence revealed a common theme of lack of training, knowledge or experience on the part of physicians and medical staff (including GPs, pharmacist and acute hospital doctors) regarding the rare risk of sepsis following Early Medical Termination. The hospital trust accepted that at the time of Sarah’s death, there was confirmation bias in their thinking due to the Covid 19 pandemic and that other differential diagnosis were not considered in this case. Whilst the witness evidence was that Sepsis protocols were in place at both the GP surgery and the hospital trust, what is of particular concern is that none of the professionals who saw or spoke to Sarah were considering Sepsis in this case. Sarah was spoken to and seen by numerous medical professionals in both primary and secondary care but no sepsis protocols were initiated and I found that the compounding delays in screening, diagnosis and treatment more than minimally contributed to a poor outcome in Sarah’s case. I heard evidence that Sepsis remains a diagnostic challenge despite all the guidelines available because the same infection does not always present in the same way in different individuals, symptoms may be non-specific and the Emergency Department may not have an obvious specific source of infection that physicians can identify. In addition, in younger patients such as Sarah, their physiological reserve and ability to cope with the infection can mean that their circulatory collapse and deterioration of the NEWS score occurs later in the disease process. Having said that, I am concerned that there remains a lack of awareness of sepsis in particular following Early Medical Abortion given how many opportunities there were to think sepsis in this case. Whilst those giving evidence to me in court are now aware of sepsis and the risks post abortion having reflected on Sarah’s death, I am concerned that there is a lack of awareness of the risk of sepsis following Early Medical Abortions. This lack of awareness in my view risks avoidable future deaths. ”

    Source location

    Sarah Louise Dunn · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Work closely with NHS England to ensure adherence to national guidance for detecting and managing sepsis-related deterioration.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “The Department is working closely with NHS England to ensure adherence to national guidance that supports the detection and management of deterioration from sepsis. In addition, in April 2022, NHS England launched a Commissioning for Quality and Innovation scheme for ‘Recording of NEWS2 score, escalation and response time for unplanned critical care admissions’. This measure will incentivise providers of acute care to use NEWS2, ensuring adherence to evidence-based steps in the identification and recording of deterioration, and enabling swifter response in acute settings.”

    Source location

    2022-0144 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 May 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Relevant medical Royal Colleges set postgraduate trainee doctors’ curricula, subject to standards set by the General Medical Council.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “You may also wish to know that the training curricula for postgraduate trainee doctors is set by the relevant medical Royal College and has to meet the standards set by the GMC. Whilst curricula do not necessarily highlight specific conditions for doctors to be aware of, they instead emphasise the skills and approaches that a doctor must develop to ensure accurate and timely diagnoses and treatment plans for their patients. This is essential in promoting effective learning and preventing future deaths or serious harm occurring again.”

    Source location

    2022-0144 - Response from Department of Health and Social Care
    Page 2 · response
    Published 17 May 2022

    Open published response
  6. Bedfordshire and Luton

    AI-generated summary

    Mandy Jane DICKERSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Mandy Jane Dickerson attended the Urgent GP Care Centre on 26 April 2020 after several days of diarrhoea and vomiting, but was discharged without assessment by the medical team. She died at home on 30 April 2020 from sepsis. The principal concerns included a non-mandatory and unreliable sepsis template, inadequate recording and communication of key observations, and confusion about referral responsibilities when specialist assessment was requested.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure of the sepsis template to operate reliably and mandatorily

    Wider context from the report

    “2. The computer system in use at the Urgent GP Care Centre was prone at the time (April 2020) to glitches which rendered the use of the "Sepsis template" to be "advised" rather than mandatory. Sometimes it would display and other times not. ”

    Source location

    Mandy Jane DICKERSON · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 3 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Upgrade the software module and add a Sepsis Screening tool that flags abnormal observations indicating sepsis risk.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The sepsis template and how it operates is part of the System One software. System One is a nationally used software and the function of its templates is outside the control of Atrumed Ltd. However, Atrumed Ltd has recently (1) changed the software module to an Urgent Care Module and (2) added a Sepsis Screening tool as a bolt on. This means that if a patient’s observations are abnormal such that there is a risk of sepsis, this will be flagged up on the system. It is Atrumed’s local policy (attached) that this tool is to be used by its clinical practitioners.”

    Source location

    2022-0100 - Response from Atrumed Healthcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Require clinical practitioners to use the Sepsis Screening tool under Atrumed’s local policy.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The sepsis template and how it operates is part of the System One software. System One is a nationally used software and the function of its templates is outside the control of Atrumed Ltd. However, Atrumed Ltd has recently (1) changed the software module to an Urgent Care Module and (2) added a Sepsis Screening tool as a bolt on. This means that if a patient’s observations are abnormal such that there is a risk of sepsis, this will be flagged up on the system. It is Atrumed’s local policy (attached) that this tool is to be used by its clinical practitioners.”

    Source location

    2022-0100 - Response from Atrumed Healthcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    The underlying System One sepsis-template function is outside Atrumed’s control, limiting its ability to alter that software directly.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “2. The sepsis template and how it operates is part of the System One software. System One is a nationally used software and the function of its templates is outside the control of Atrumed Ltd. However, Atrumed Ltd has recently (1) changed the software module to an Urgent Care Module and (2) added a Sepsis Screening tool as a bolt on. This means that if a patient’s observations are abnormal such that there is a risk of sepsis, this will be flagged up on the system. It is Atrumed’s local policy (attached) that this tool is to be used by its clinical practitioners.”

    Source location

    2022-0100 - Response from Atrumed Healthcare
    Page 4 · response
    Published 26 April 2022

    Open published response
  7. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    ARTHUR FREDERICK HALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Arthur Frederick Hall developed a perforation following an elective colonoscopy with polypectomy on 31 January 2018. He was discharged from A&E after presenting with abdominal symptoms, later returned with sepsis and underwent emergency surgery, but died on 2 March 2018 from overwhelming sepsis and multiple organ failure. The principal concerns included inadequate investigation and assessment of possible bowel perforation, unclear discharge advice, failure to obtain surgical input, and missed signs of sepsis.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Failure to recognise signs of sepsis

    Wider context from the report

    “8. Signs of sepsis were missed. ”

    Source location

    ARTHUR FREDERICK HALL · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 5 · concerns

    Open source report
  8. Surrey

    AI-generated summary

    Joyce May DENNIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Joyce May Dennis, a resident of Roseacre Care Home, became unwell on 9 September 2019 and deteriorated over the following days before being admitted to hospital with sepsis and the onset of a heart attack. She died at 15.30 on 13 September 2019. The principal concerns were inadequate monitoring and record-keeping, failure to investigate or escalate worsening symptoms, insufficient staff training about illness and sepsis in older people, poor liaison, and failure to record family concerns.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Inadequate training and understanding about sepsis in elderly people

    Wider context from the report

    “6. The understanding and training about sepsis in elderly people was not adequate. ”

    Source location

    Joyce May DENNIS · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 7 · concerns

    Open source report
  9. Nottinghamshire

    AI-generated summary

    Jacob · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Jacob died at eleven months from acute pyelonephritis, following earlier urinary tract sepsis and severe obstruction of both ureters. Investigations identifying the obstruction were not reviewed during his life, and the seriousness of a later infection was not recognised. The report identified concerns including low compliance with paediatric sepsis screening, lack of consultant review before discharge, and inadequate systems for reviewing investigation results.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Low compliance with the paediatric sepsis screening tool

    Wider context from the report

    “1. Continuing low compliance with the Paediatric sepsis screening tool ”

    Source location

    Jacob · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Monitor paediatric sepsis-screening compliance through quarterly audits and report results to clinical governance and quality committees.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Compliance with the Paediatric sepsis screening tool is being monitored proactively by the Paediatric Sepsis lead, Clinical Governance Lead for Paediatrics, and the Divisional Director of Nursing for Children & Neonates with the support of the clinical audit team. Results are collated at the end of each quarter and presented in a separate part of the clinical audit and effectiveness report. The current audit tool which reflects the report shared at the inquest, reviews the clinical records of all children admitted with a clinical coding of sepsis during the relevant time period. This includes children referred via the Emergency Department (ED), General Practitioner (GP) and Community Midwife (CMW).”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Disseminate sepsis-learning and screening-tool messages through staff memoranda, the monthly Matron Newsletter and Clinical Governance meeting records.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A memo was issued by the Children’s Services Matron on 21 April 2021 to all members of the paediatric medical and nursing teams outlining actions following the SI investigation, including reference to the sepsis audit results and the need to improve compliance.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and pilot a multidisciplinary sepsis audit tool covering the pathway from Emergency Department arrival.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A sepsis audit tool Task and Finish group with MDT input from both Paediatric and ED teams has been set up to review the audit tool for sepsis management, which will audit the pathway from the point of arrival in the Emergency Department. Due to the complexity of the different referral pathways this is a complex audit tool to develop, it is currently in the final stages of development, the aim is to pilot this in Q3. For Q2 the current audit tool will be used.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Review and approve the sepsis screening and action tool standard operating procedure through the specialty Clinical Governance meeting.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• The sepsis screening and action tool Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) has been reviewed in line with review date of September 2021, this is currently shared for comments and will be approved at the specialty Clinical Governance meeting in October.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Complete weekly assurance audits of clinical records across acute areas, covering sepsis assessment and related discharge and communication safeguards.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• In addition to the audit process, the Divisional Director of Nursing for Children & Neonates and the Matron for Children’s Services have developed an assurance tool, which is being completed weekly for a period of 12 weeks, auditing approximately 5 sets of clinical records every week from each acute area. Unlike the sepsis audit the assurance tool is not exclusive to patients with a clinical diagnosis of sepsis. The tool is designed to monitor the following which were areas of concern noted at the inquest:”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 3 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Develop and implement electronic paediatric observations, incorporating sepsis screening into Nervecentre after deployment.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• A working group has been developed to evolve from ‘paper-based’ physiological observation charts to electronic observations at both Doncaster and Bassetlaw. The current Paediatric Advanced Warning Score (PAWS) charts have been shared with Nervecentre for development on the platform and the paediatric team is working closely with Nervecentre. Due to a major incident at Doncaster Royal Infirmary which has resulted in the temporary relocation of children’s inpatient services the implementation date is December 2021 which is in line with services moving into modular wards. As advised by the implementation team once the e-observations are embedded in practice, sepsis screening will then be incorporated into Nervecentre. The paper version of the sepsis screening and action tool will remain in use until that time.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Continue mandatory induction and multidisciplinary staff-development training on paediatric sepsis recognition, management and use of the screening tool.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Sepsis awareness training will remain on the mandatory induction programme for newly appointed staff; this specifically includes reference to the paediatric sepsis tool. Ongoing training is provided to staff within Paediatrics by way of MDT staff development days, which will continue to be delivered and include sessions provided by the Paediatric Consultant Lead for sepsis. This training which commenced in 2017, references the paediatric sepsis tool within clinical scenarios. Whilst this training was stepped down during the Covid-19 pandemic it re-commenced in April 2021 via MS Teams with monthly sessions being held since then.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 4 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Include recognition and management of the sick child, including sepsis screening, in Emergency Department junior-doctor induction.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Inclusion of “Recognition & management of the sick child” which includes sepsis in junior doctors’ induction with reference to the sepsis screening and action tool. This training is aligned with the European Paediatric Advanced Life Support (EPALS) course and is delivered by the Paediatric Emergency Medicine Consultant.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Deliver recurring Emergency Department teaching sessions on sepsis recognition, management and use of the sepsis screening tool.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Teaching sessions are delivered to junior and middle grade doctors twice in a 4 month period (junior doctors rotate every 4 months) with topics involving sepsis. This teaching session includes recognition and management of sepsis by using the sepsis screening and action tool. All junior doctors, nursing staff, advanced care practitioners (ACP), trainee ACPs and consultants can access these sessions through Microsoft Teams.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Run weekly multidisciplinary paediatric simulation sessions across both sites, including paediatric sepsis topics.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Simulation sessions are run on both Doncaster and Bassetlaw sites weekly with one paediatric topic monthly, the last session on paediatric sepsis was in August. These are open for all members of the MDT they are not mandatory at present, however, ED are planning to make this a core competency for all the junior doctors during their training in ED.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Employ a Paediatric Clinical Educator for Emergency Department staff induction and sepsis-screening support.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• Recruitment of a Paediatric Clinical Educator specifically for ED who works closely with the Paediatric Clinical Educators who support children’s services. The Clinical Educators support new staff on induction, which includes sepsis screening and management with reference to the sepsis screening and action tool.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Incorporate sepsis screening into the Emergency Department Symphony system and train staff before implementation.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “• ED is currently undertaking work to incorporate the sepsis screening into the Symphony system used in ED, once this is completed further monitoring of compliance can be undertaken specifically for patients that present via ED. Staff training will be delivered to the MDT once this is completed prior to ‘go live’ date which is not confirmed.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 5 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response

    Source evidence

    How this respondent position was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Immediate sepsis treatment with clear documentation makes retrospective completion of the sepsis screening tool unnecessary.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “Comment for the patient with no sepsis screening and action tool completed for May-21: Patient brought to ED resus ASHICE cardiac arrest alert, treated immediately as sepsis, therefore sepsis screening and action tool not completed, but very clear documentation.”

    Source location

    2021-0259-Response-from-Doncaster-and-Bassetlaw-Teaching-Hospitals-NHS-Foundation-Trust_Published
    Page 2 · response
    Published 3 August 2021

    Open published response
  10. Avon

    AI-generated summary

    Anastasia Ekaterina UGLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report

    This summary was generated using AI from the published report. Please read the original report for the complete account.

    Report summary

    Anastasia Ekaterina Uglow became increasingly unwell during a school trip to New York after having been unwell beforehand. She developed septic shock, collapsed in cardiac arrest and died at Mount Sinai Hospital on 19 December 2019. The principal concern was the need to raise awareness of sepsis in schools, including among staff supervising school trips.

    Read the report on judiciary.uk

    Source evidence

    How this individual concern was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the report wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Lack of sepsis awareness in schools

    Wider context from the report

    “In this case it became clear that Ana’s school is already taking the step to include within their first aid training for staff – sepsis awareness. This case clearly demonstrates how awful this condition is and how tragic the consequences are if it left untreated. My report is therefore written to consider raising sepsis awareness within all schools. ”

    Source location

    Anastasia Ekaterina UGLOW · Prevention of Future Deaths report
    Page 2 · concerns

    Open source report

    Source evidence

    How this respondent action was interpreted

    PFD Monitor created a concise, searchable interpretation from the published response wording shown below.

    PFD Monitor interpretation

    Update departmental health and safety guidance for schools to reference the OEAP’s sepsis-awareness guidance.

    Verbatim wording from the response

    “As you know the Outdoor Education Advisers’ Panel (OEAP) is working with the school and the UK Sepsis Trust to update its national guidance in relation to sepsis awareness. My department intends to update its Health and safety: responsibilities and duties for schools to reference the work of the OEAP.”

    Source location

    2021-0216-Response-from-Department-for-Education_Published
    Page 1 · response
    Published 28 June 2021

    Open published response
Back to top

Data last updated 7 September 2026