Recurring concern
Unreliable staff access to and understanding of safety-critical guidance
First reported 3 Dec 2013•Latest report 11 Jan 2023
What this concern includes
Includes failures of staff-facing arrangements to provide access to safety-critical guidance or learning material and to verify that relevant staff have accessed, considered and understood it, including computer-based material and associated acknowledgement or comprehension checks.
Not included
- Excludes substantive deficiencies in the guidance itself where access or staff understanding is not the reported unsafe condition.
- Excludes generic staff training, staffing or communication deficiencies that are not specifically tied to access to or understanding of safety-critical guidance.
- Excludes failures to implement a safety change after staff have reliably accessed and understood the relevant guidance.
- Excludes named systems, pathways or hazard-specific guidance where that narrower concern provides the more specific supported boundary.
- Reports
- 13
- Individual concerns
- 13
- Date range
- 2013–2023
- Stated actions
- 10
Distinct published reports
A report can raise multiple concerns
First to latest report issue date
Described in published responses
Reports over time
Reports over time
Reports about this concern issued each year.
* 2026 is projected from reports observed to 7 Sep 2026.
Most frequent recipients
Most frequent recipients
Reports about this concern sent to each recipient.
Concerns and responses across reports
Only concerns grouped under this recurring concern are included. Select any concern, action or position to view the source wording.
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to disseminate Trust Policy and NPSA Guidance to all staff
This report raised 3 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Actions described in response An action is something a respondent says it has done, is doing, or plans to do in response to the concern raised.3
-
Action
Appoint a Risk and Document Control Manager to oversee patient-safety alerts and corporate and clinical policy document control.
Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Standardise dissemination of clinical guidelines so practice changes are identified centrally and cascaded to all clinical divisions.
Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust -
Action
Develop a system recording divisional action on patient-safety alerts and enabling prompt escalation of non-compliance.
Stated by Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to provide the medication administration and holding policy in a protocol or policy statement to relevant staff
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
Respondent positions A position is what a respondent says about the concern when they do not describe a specific action.1
-
Position
Responsibility for safeguarding clients regarding prescribed medication lies with GPs, not the organisation.
Stated by 700 Club
-
Concerns raised1
Failure to share root cause analysis learning with relevant staff
This report raised 2 other concerns. They are not shown here because they do not form part of this recurring concern.
Responses linked to these concernsEach statement is shown once, even when linked to more than one concern.
No linked response statementsNo respondent-stated action or position is linked to these concerns in the published data.
Data last updated 7 September 2026